home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 20488 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-28  |  967 b   |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!morrow.stanford.edu!decwrl!pa.dec.com!emunix.emich.edu!teera
  3. From: teera@emunix.emich.edu (Teerawat Pawittranon)
  4. Message-ID: <9207281645.AA07545@emunix.emich.edu>
  5. Subject: 386SX 8MHz ?! What is POPAD bug?
  6. Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 12:45:06 EDT
  7. X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA13561; Tue, 28 Jul 92 09:44:36 -0700
  8. X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA00292; Tue, 28 Jul 92 09:44:30 -0700
  9. X-Received: by emunix.emich.edu (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)id AA07545; Tue, 28 Jul 92 12:45:07 -0400
  10. X-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.usenet (ibm.usenet)
  11. X-Cc: teera@emunix.emich.edu (Teerawat Pawittranon)
  12. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL8]
  13. Lines: 11
  14.  
  15. Hi All,
  16.  
  17. Is there such a thing as 386SX 8MHz chip?  The norton "si" reported that the
  18. chip is 386SX 8MHz but infoplus did not.  The chip label says 386SX-16.
  19.  
  20. What is "POPAD" bug?  Infoplus reported this, and claimed it is normal for
  21. 386 chips.
  22.  
  23. Please comment.  Thank you.
  24.  
  25. Tee
  26.