home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / std / cplus / 930 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-23  |  751 b   |  18 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad
  3. From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
  4. Subject: Re: abstraction (was: Re: Give me a break)
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul23.180535.9525@microsoft.com>
  6. Date: 23 Jul 92 18:05:35 GMT
  7. Organization: Microsoft Corporation
  8. References: <1992Jul17.215414.15202@cmcl2.nyu.edu> <1992Jul20.232555.27851@microsoft.com> <1992Jul23.020241.11513@cmcl2.nyu.edu>
  9. Lines: 7
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Jul23.020241.11513@cmcl2.nyu.edu> checker@acf3.nyu.edu (Christopher Hecker) writes:
  12. |Hmm, I'm not sure you want to make this argument.  Carried to its
  13. |extreme, we could say, why are so many people using OWL?
  14.  
  15. How many people ARE using it?  If many people are using it, why aren't the
  16. other compiler vendors licensing it?
  17.  
  18.