home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!rdg.dec.com!adserv.enet.dec.com!winalski
- From: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
- Subject: Re: ?Effect of large number of logical definitions?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul23.143600.3476@rdg.dec.com>
- Date: 23 Jul 92 14:36:00 GMT
- References: <1992Jul23.094517.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
- Sender: news@rdg.dec.com (Mr News)
- Reply-To: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski)
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Nashua NH
- Lines: 14
-
-
- In article <1992Jul23.094517.1@woods.ulowell.edu>,
- welchb@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
- |>
- |>What measurable or noticeable effect upon users is caused by having
- |>a large number of logicals defined in the system tables? I ask this
- |>because we just installed GKS; it has created close to 100 logical names,
- |>which will seldom get used.
- |>Will this slow down the average non-GKS user? Should the designers
- |>of GKS have used a different method?
-
- Little or no effect whatsoever. Don't worry about it.
-
- --PSW
-