home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!tjc
- From: tjc@acsu.buffalo.edu (Thomas J. Corsalini)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: MSD under OS/2 (Was Re: Couple of OS/2 problems...)
- Message-ID: <Bs7szn.KA6@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 30 Jul 92 18:35:47 GMT
- References: <55314@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <GHENNIGA.92Jul29111724@ampere.ampere> <92Jul30.053631.25074@acs.ucalgary.ca>
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: UB Law School
- Lines: 29
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lictor.acsu.buffalo.edu
-
- In article <92Jul30.053631.25074@acs.ucalgary.ca> bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens) writes:
- >In article <GHENNIGA.92Jul29111724@ampere.ampere> ghenniga@NMSU.Edu writes:
- >>
- >>In an article jclei@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jason Lei) writes:
- >>
- >>This means that OS/2 DOS emulation is to report to MSD.EXE that it is running
- >>under DOS 4.01 and that OS/2 is to tell it this up to 255 times. Now click on
- >>the "Save" button in the bottom left and close the notebook. Start your
- >>DOS full screen session and see if MSD will run now. It has for me everytime!
- >
- >There are (at least) two versions of MSD, 1.10 and 2.00. The first one
- >reports the OS as DOS 5. The other correctly identifies it as OS/2 2.0.
- >The first one seems to choke for quite a while on my 360 k 5.25in B drive;
- >the other doesn't. (BTW, PCtools 7.1's SI does the same thing; and
- >reports the OS as DOS 20.0).
- >
- I have noticed that MSD reports a 16550 UART on COM1 under OS/2 but
- an 8250 under DOS! Has anyone else noticed this? My I/O board has a 16450
- chip.
-
- --Tom
-
-
-
- --
- + T.J.Corsalini, Director - Computing Services @ UB Law School +
- + State University of New York at Buffalo +
- + Internet: mictom@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu +
- + Voice: (716)636-5959 Fax: (716)636-2064 +
-