home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!uchinews!ellis!sip1
- From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
- Subject: Re: os/2 & 80387
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.021711.2652@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
- References: <1992Jul27.1480.23147@dosgate>
- Distribution: comp
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 02:17:11 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <1992Jul27.1480.23147@dosgate> "stephen dawson" <stephen.dawson@canrem.com> writes:
- >Is OS/2 itself any faster with a 80387 installed? Why or why not.
-
- No, simply because no portion of the base operating system that I know
- of makes use of a math coprocessor (it would not benefit).
-
- --
- Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
- from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
- directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
- LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton. Yay.
-