home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!hardy.u.washington.edu!barr
- From: barr@hardy.u.washington.edu (David Barr)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Installing from 0.96c root disk(success)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.153554.13291@u.washington.edu>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 15:35:54 GMT
- References: <1992Jul25.233826.2624@athena.mit.edu> <1992Jul27.204146.35137@uservx.plk.af.mil> <HAZEN.92Jul28093857@budoe.bu.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Washington
- Lines: 15
-
- hazen@budoe.bu.edu (Eric Hazen) writes:
-
- >I found that fs.h was in the kernel header files, in
- >/usr/src/linux/include/linux. I symlinked to /usr/include/linux
- >[ ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux /usr/include/linux ]
- >and it worked fine.
-
- >Could someone more knowledgeable please comment if this is a good idea?
- >Is the directory /usr/include/linux supposed to point to kernel headers?
- >--
-
- Sounds like it would be better to add -I/usr/src/linux/include/linux
- to the include flags in the Makefile (maybe).
-
- David
-