home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!mimsy!ra!tantalus!eric
- From: eric@tantalus.dell.com (Eric Youngdale)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: GNU Hurd (was Re: BSD Unix)
- Message-ID: <3082@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Date: 21 Jul 92 18:24:58 GMT
- References: <23992@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Jul21.112705.6276@cs.cornell.edu> <1992Jul21.131526.8920@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
- Distribution: comp
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1992Jul21.131526.8920@ncsu.edu> jlnance@eos.ncsu.edu (JAMES LEWIS NANCE) writes:
- >
- >In article <1992Jul21.112705.6276@cs.cornell.edu>, murthy@cs.cornell.edu (Chet Murthy) writes:
- >|> free unix is perhaps 2 years away - in 2 years, linux will be stable.
- >|> In two years, the GNU Hurd will be stable. And AT&T can
- >
- >I have been wondering this for some time but have refrained from asking it
- >because it sounds like a flame, but it is not.
- >
- >GNU has been working on Hurd for as long as I have know about them. This has
- >been at least 3 years, and I have seen nothing from them. Linus has been
- >working on linux for about a year and a half, and has produced a very good
- >operating system. Does anyone know what is taking GNU so long? Prehaps they
- >have released beta versions that I am unaware of, or prehaps they do not
- >want to release anything before they get it finished? Anyone know?
-
- The one important difference is that hurd is supposed to be able to run
- on any type of machine (sparc, vax, 386, etc). This makes the problem far more
- complicated. Device drivers need to be written and optimized for each machine.
- I would also guess (based on experience with some of the other gnu utilities)
- that it may be suffering from feeping creaturism. This is, of course, purely
- conjecture.
-
- I have seen alpha versions (or perhaps pre-alpha) on some of the GNU
- machines at mit, but I have never tried to download it, and I have never
- seen an announcement.
-
- --
- Eric Youngdale
- eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil
-