home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!olivea!hal.com!gorn.hal.com!not-for-mail
- From: savel@hal.COM (Bharat P. Savel)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.verilog
- Subject: Re: Getting round verilog hierarchical structure
- Message-ID: <153vrlINNkjt@gorn.hal.com>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 17:24:05 GMT
- References: <Bs23x4.330@brunel.ac.uk> <dank.712282499@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Organization: HaL Computer Systems Inc.
- Lines: 11
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gorn.hal.com
-
- with that kind of instantiations, a performance problem may arise. for
- instance, we do not know the size of A, B or C. true, it is a great way to
- go structural, but when the 3 units become very big, speed drops.
-
- an alternate way be to have 3 tasks or 3 @always statements. but is this
- what you want?
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bharat P. Savel /tmp/Design_Engineer
- Ext. 1307
- Motto: If we can't fix it, it ain't broke
-