home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!mole-end!mat
- From: mat@mole-end
- Subject: Re: Committee Members -> What do you think?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul20.175104.17794@mole-end>
- Summary: Off-line discussion, anyone?
- Organization: :
- References: <1992Jul11.044129.24382@mv.mv.com> <1992Jul17.194202.14981@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1992 17:51:04 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- On operator.() :
-
- > On the contrary "almost everybody" will have no say in this matter, as
- > history has already shown. On the contrary, a couple people on the
- > extensions committee will either support the idea, or talk it down, and
- > that will be sufficient to get it on, or keep it off, the floor of the
- > committee whole for a vote.
-
- How many people would be interested in an off-line discussion by e-mail?
- E-mail to me, please. If there is interest, I will see what I have to
- do to get a working mailing list up here. ``Interest'' means some kind
- of commitment of three to six people to think, argue, come to consensus,
- write some text, criticize some text, rewrite some text ....
-
- I warn you--I will play out my agenda, which is to see a particular version
- of this operator.() proposal put into shape such that it has a chance of
- being seriously examined by the Extensions WG. This will be a lot of work,
- both brain work and scut work. If you feel it's worth your time, your
- inspiration, and your perspiration, please let me know.
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- uunet!mole-end!mat, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-