home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!telly!druid!darcy
- From: darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
- Subject: Re: Hungarian notation
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.142554.9167@druid.uucp>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 14:25:54 GMT
- References: <1992Jul20.084316.15691@druid.uucp> <1992Jul20.220701.1095@trl.oz.au>
- Organization: D'Arcy Cain Consulting
- Lines: 26
-
- [Apologies if you see this twice - I think it failed the first time]
-
- aduncan@rhea.trl.OZ.AU (Allan Duncan) writes:
- >From article <1992Jul20.084316.15691@druid.uucp>, by darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain):
- >> On the other hand, a properly prototyped program using a modern compiler
- >> will tell you when you are using a variable incorrectly and in the above
- >> example will simply do the promotion silently. This means that you don't
- >> even have to know what filepos is other than that it is a variable holding
- >> the position in a file. You can deal with the abstract concept without
- >> getting involved in the details of the bits that are used to implement it.
- >
- >This reliance on a compiler is no better than a journalist relying on a
- >spelling and grammar checker. It is getting very common now to see
-
- There is nothing wrong with relying on your tools to help you. Of course
- you can't rely *solely* on your tools but where is that not true? If a
- journalist or other writer were to put their work through a checker before
- or after manually checking that would be better than manually checking
- alone. One may as well say that reliance on your own ability as a sole
- means of catching coding errors is irresponsible. Use the tools.
-
- --
- D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@druid.com) |
- D'Arcy Cain Consulting | There's no government
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada | like no government!
- +1 416 424 2871 DoD#0082 |
-