home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / bit / listserv / edtech / 1476 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-26  |  1.0 KB  |  25 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU!LL23
  3. Approved-By:  "EDTECH Moderator" <21765EDT@MSU.BITNET>
  4. Message-ID: <EDTECH%92072610025074@OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
  5. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edtech
  6. Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  7. Date:         Sun, 26 Jul 1992 10:00:30 EDT
  8. Sender:       "EDTECH - Educational Technology" <EDTECH@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
  9. From:         Karen Kay <LL23%NEMOMUS.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
  10. Subject:      Re: Convincing Faculty
  11. Lines: 12
  12.  
  13. > If software could become a line on faculty vita it would be an incentive.  As
  14.  
  15. This kind of statement gives me the willies.  There are a lot of faculty
  16. who are involved in the application of educational technology that don't
  17. write programs and won't write programs. I am one of them.  The produc-
  18. tion of software should not be the only way to give faculty 'credit' for
  19. using technology in their work.
  20.  
  21. If I did write software, btw, I would certainly include it in my vita.
  22.  
  23. Karen Kay
  24. ll23@nemomus
  25.