home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / alt / wolves / 31 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-30  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.wolves:31 rec.pets.dogs:9162
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu!markh
  3. From: markh@sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu (Mark Hurwitz)
  4. Newsgroups: alt.wolves,rec.pets.dogs
  5. Subject: Re: Dogs & Renting (was: response to rec.pets.dogs FAQ)
  6. Message-ID: <159c3kINN99p@agate.berkeley.edu>
  7. Date: 30 Jul 92 18:23:48 GMT
  8. References: <1992Jul29.215657.6960@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <HUNTER.92Jul30090049@work.nlm.nih.gov> <Bs7oz5.4rx@well.sf.ca.us>
  9. Organization: Space Science Labs
  10. Lines: 17
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu
  12.  
  13. In article <Bs7oz5.4rx@well.sf.ca.us> casey@well.sf.ca.us (Kathleen Creighton) writes:
  14. >I found in San Francisco
  15. >that it's easier to rent with pets at either the *low end* or the *high
  16. >end* of the market.  There's very, very little pet-friendly housing
  17. >available in the "middle".
  18. >
  19.     I found that potential renters object more to a dog in principle
  20. than in practice.
  21.  
  22.     Tell them over the phone that you have a large dog; they'll
  23. tell you not to bother to apply.
  24.  
  25.     Go visit the house, meet the renter, impress him or her with
  26. your responsibility, THEN mention the large, clean, well-behaved
  27. dog.  Much better response.
  28.  
  29. Mark
  30.