home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!ubc-cs!mala.bc.ca!epp
- From: epp@mala.bc.ca (Lorne Epp)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: words that peeve me
- Message-ID: <1992Jul26.210407.602@mala.bc.ca>
- Date: 26 Jul 92 21:04:07 -0700
- References: <gate.BmwFoB1w164w@buscard.fidonet.org> <9541@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <1992Jul26.225248.27492@athena.mit.edu>
- Organization: Malaspina College
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Jul26.225248.27492@athena.mit.edu>, dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
- > In article <9541@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> michaeln@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
- >>
- >>In article BmwFoB1w164w@buscard.fidonet.org, dand@buscard.fidonet.org (Dan Davidson) writes:
- >>> Then, what do you think of *verbs* such as "finalize", "destruct",
- >>>"conference"... ?
- >>
- >>The other two I can live with, but "destruct"?
- >
- > Yeah, "destruct."
- >
- > Synonym: destrue
- > Antonym: constroy
- >
- > Get with the program!
- >
-
- In the C++ programming language "destructor" is the opposite of "constructor".
- I think it's a shame that they missed the chance to have a programming
- concept with the name "destroyer" - that would have been cool!
-
- Lorne Epp
- epp@mala.bc.ca
-