World of Ham Radio 1997/WOHR97_AmSoft_(1997-02-01).iso/usenets/1996_03/_equipme.txt

Text File | 1997-02-01 | 1MB | 31,075 lines

The World of Ham Radio CD-ROM



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Newton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: REQ: Any MOD's for IC25A ?
Date: 1 Mar 1996 19:14:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4h7i9v$[e-mail]>




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:08 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB; 6 MTR ALL MODE
Date: 5 Mar 1996 05:08:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgi85$[e-mail]>

I'm looking to purchas an ICOM-551D 6m all mode, you can E-mail me or call (50
4)593-2105 and ask for Kevin.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay B)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Want 2 meter Transever
Date: 6 Mar 1996 13:21:45 -0500
Message-ID: <4hkl3p$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk8uk$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay B)

i have a yaesu ft207r for $50.  works good.  Jay


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Parke Rhoads)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: unsubscribe
Date: 2 Mar 96 01:09:39 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

cancel all subscriptions



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Art Alto)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 8250 UART chip
Date: 5 Mar 1996 22:43:50 -0500
Message-ID: <4hj1lm$[e-mail]>

Does anyone know who makes the 8250 UART?  I've been trying to download
data sheets for it but cannot find it anywhere on the web.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (JCHol)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best 1.5KW HF AMP?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 18:40:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4hijdo$[e-mail]>
References: <4hbdhj$esa$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JCHol)

Try the QRO HF-2000.  It is a lot of amp for the money and the quietest I
have ever seen.  I really like mine.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:12 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: fs:hm-10
Date: 2 Mar 1996 05:09:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8l5o$[e-mail]>

i have for sale a heil hm-10 mic with #4 element and desk stand.
price $70 shipped.....73 kr4wr ron



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (RICHARD DOHERTY)
Subject: WTB: DUAL BAND W/SCAN
Date: 2 Mar 96 04:28:09 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

IM LOOKING FOR A DUAL BAND HT WITH EXTENDED SCANNING CAPABILITY AT A
FAIR PRICE. ICOM W 21AT, FT 530, STANDARD 508 OR?
REGARDS, DICK


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Roger Ashton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: CBs
Date: 2 Mar 1996 17:18:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>

I'm lookin around for some low cost cb with a range of a couple of
miles. Anybody got any suggestions ?



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Lewis Bullard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trade 5ht for 2ht
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 21:29:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4haedm$[e-mail]>

I have three standard hx 400U ht's, 1 standard hx340 ht,
and 1 erricson/ge ht. I would like to trade for two
motorola ht's. Interested?


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:15 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HM-10 FOR SALE
Date: 2 Mar 1996 05:02:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8kor$[e-mail]>
To: All

    I have for sale a Heil HM10 mic with stand and #4 element.
This is wired ffor Kenwood. Price $70......73 ,Ron



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola HF gear?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:06:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4hetck$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Motorola did manufacture HF equipment, for the Military.
Examples are the old R-390 / R-392 series of receivers.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mitch Hopper)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Zenith Transoceanic
Date: 5 Mar 1996 16:07:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhosc$[e-mail]>

WTB: Zenith Transoceanic.  Make offer please.
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jack)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-W31A Opinions Sought
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 16:37:21 EST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Would appreciate any comments on the ICOM W31A, pro or con.  Any info on
RX sensitivity at about 500MHz would also be helpful  Thanks, Jack KA3OTU.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Snyder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: fs johnson desk kilowatt
Date: 7 Mar 96 02:40:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have for sale a Johnson Desk Kilowatt transmitter.  Serial No. 19
good operating condition.  Ranger I and II also available. Contact
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (RH)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Uniden HR2600 mods?
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 23:16:34
Message-ID: <4hlrfv$[e-mail]>

Looking for mod for Uniden HR2600 to open up 11m band.
                Thanks Ron



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:20 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Shure Crystal Microphone Value?
Date: 6 Mar 1996 01:48:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4hiqss$[e-mail]>

        Have a 40's - 50's Shure "Super Level" Microphone thats in excellent conditio
n. Model 70ST.
Missing small "S" insignia button from base (anyone have one?) Perfect chrome
/ perfect gray painted
base. Works fine. Value? Offers? Please e-mail. Thanks, Dick Doremus


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HOW DO I ERASE A LISTING?
Date: 3 Mar 1996 00:51:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4haqe8$[e-mail]>
References: <4h90ku$[e-mail]>

It shud be "DELETED" automaticly in 8-10 days.

[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:22 1996
From: Gregg Fine <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help with KWM-2A
Date: 2 Mar 1996 23:20:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4hal4g$6q2$[e-mail]>

need tuning procedure for Collins KWM-2A and wiring diagram for
mic.

Gregg - KF4AUY/AAT4AD


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:22 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Looking for Wilson WE 800
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 09:22:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4hh207$[e-mail]>

   I am looking for a Wilson WE 800 working or not
                             Email me if you can help
                                                           N7QFQ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony J. Monteiro X-6315)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need suggestion on 2 meter all mode mobile
Date: 5 Mar 96 21:09:10 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Yaesu currently makes the FT-290R-II which comes with a "snap-on" 25 Watt
amplifier for mobile or fixed station use (when not using the battery pack)
This unit is still in production and is probably the cheapest all-mode
2m rig available.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:24 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Cooper Abrams)
To: All
Subject: How can I modify a FT201 to work on 74meter(MARS)
Summary: Modify FT201 to work 74meters
Keywords: Modify Yaesu FT201
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 02:25:44 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have a Yaesu FT201 (1975) tube and crytsals.  Can
I modify it to work in 40.29 & 40.20khz.  Thanks for
any help.
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:26 1996
From: PHIL DIAZ <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HOW DO I ERASE A LISTING?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 01:25:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4h90ku$[e-mail]>

CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO ERASE A POSTED NOTICE? MY UNIT SOLD AND I WANT
TO REMOVE IT FROM THE LISTINGS.
                  WOULD APPRECIATE IT,
                      PHIL  KC7AFB



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:27 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham Stores in NYC
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 06:04:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4h63or$[e-mail]>

I've been hearing about another store other then Barry's in NYC. Can
anyone give me  Name and Address ( maybe even a telephone number too.)
????
 Thanks.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:28 1996
From: "Gregory J. Buhyoff" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT 900 - turning off spontaneously?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:24:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4heuek$[e-mail]>
References: <4henil$[e-mail]>

I meant to say --- turning OFF spontaneously ------






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:28 1996
From: mike guest <[e-mail]@pop.clandjop.com>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom-25H Info
Date: 5 Mar 1996 21:04:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4hia8o$[e-mail]>
References: <4hcgj5$[e-mail]>
To: kmcgrat@goodguy

expanded rf
1. set offset to 0.0





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (DeNoid95X)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS FT-900/AT with ant.'s
Date: 6 Mar 1996 14:11:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4hko12$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (DeNoid95X)

I am selling my HF rig after only four months.  The Yaesu FT-900/AT comes
with the YSK-900 seperation kit and two antenna's 20 and 40 meter sticks.
Call me a 315-487-9185 or email me.  I am asking $1000 if you have an
offer none the less make it.
N9RLR/2


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Parke Rhoads)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham-Equip Digest unsubscribe
Date: 6 Mar 96 19:02:53 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

unsubscribe
[e-mail]

now!



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:31 1996
From: tomching <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 23:53:17 +0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

You can not enter RX frequency greater than 470 MHz on ADMS-1 Software
so you can't load RX frequencies greater than 470MHz into the FT-51R by
ADMS-1.
If you want to do this, you can try EZ Clone.

http://www.acsys.com


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ANYONE SELLING BENDIZ/KING
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:03:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4het82$[e-mail]>
References: <4h3re6$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4h83ro$[e-mail]>

03-02-96

Try radio.swap...seen one fer $350 ?

[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robyn Lyn Lempicki)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Late model FT-530 mods?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 03:17:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgboh$[e-mail]>

Hi!  I just got a new FT-530.  According to the mod that I found while
searching the net, there is one solder pad (#13) to open up.  My radio looks a
bit different inside...I had a green wire that was just begging to be cut, so
I did it!  It looks like that enabled airband rx.  Does anyone know how to get
800-950mhz rx?  How abt extended tx? -Gerry



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (ve1alq)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu G500/KemproKR500
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 17:44:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkit9$[e-mail]>

I am looking for a replacement G500 or KR500 EL rotor, I really do not require

the control box but will consider.

Please state price including shippping.    I USA shipto address is available.

Thanks  Darrell,  Ve1ALQ        [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Wallace)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need repeater listing for Cincinnati, OH
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 06:52:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlmad$[e-mail]>

I just bought an FT-530 today and forgot to get a repeater directory.
Could somebody please e-mail me the in/out frequencies of a few
repeaters in Cincinnati??? Thank you very much in advance...

KB8IFZ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:35 1996
From: Steven Smith <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2.4 Ghz Power Amp
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 16:11:46 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Does anyone have info on a reasonably priced 2.4Ghz Bilateral Power Amp
like the Hyper Amp 2410 (10watt for $3600). That price is way beyond my
hobby budget!

Thanks.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:36 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,alt.radio.swap
Subject: Can I boost the output power of a KW TM-741A?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 06:40:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8jrj$[e-mail]>

I have a modified (extended band range) Kenwood TM-741A.  I have the 28MHz,
144MHz, & 440MHz band units installed. The output power is 50W for the 28 & 14
4,
and 35W for the 440.   I would like to boost the output power to around 100W f
or
each... (although I could live with less on the 440.).  Please ignore my lack
of
knowledge in this area.  Also, please post replies here as I am going to chang
e
my ISP soon.   tia.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (ZaaX)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RFI Proof Paint Available?
Date: 1 Mar 1996 23:54:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4h8k9g$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ZaaX)

Does anyone out there know of any company that produces a paint that
reduces
RFI? If you know of one please route me their address or phone number. Any
help with this will be greatly appreciated!

73 Zack Schindler
N8FNR


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (Pieter Ibelings)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HP8505 Network Analyzer 4 sale in Atlanta Area.
Date: 4 Mar 1996 02:37:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4hdl1e$[e-mail]>

I have an HP8505A network analyzer with HP8502B test set and 8750A normalizer.

All in good working condx, but some cables missing. I would like to sell in th
e
Atlanta Area. $1600. Send me e-mail for more info.

Pieter
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christer Lindholm)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Manual for Sommerkamp FTDX505
Date: 5 Mar 1996 19:03:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi36a$[e-mail]>

HELP!
Iwould like to get a copy of the operateurs manual or the service manual for
the old Sommerkamp FTDX505.
Copy and mail costs cherfully coverd.

73 de Chris SM4JFG



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (MIKEHAACK)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: 5 Mar 1996 21:07:07 -0500
Message-ID: <4his0b$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (MIKEHAACK)

If your want good headphones .....

 The "HEIL" Headset...

Accept no substitutes...

73, MIKE WB9B


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:40 1996
From: Bill Kirk <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB:  HF VFO
Date: 6 Mar 1996 00:18:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4hilkj$[e-mail]>

I am interested in buying an external HF VFO with at least 2 watt output
to replace the xtal in a Lettine 240 xmtr.  If you have one to sell,
please contact me directly via my E-Mail address.  Thanx!

73,
Bill  W6RQQ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:41 1996
From: Bob Dashoff <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Bird watt meter (need part)
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 19:25:08 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have a Bird wattmeter that needs a logo plate for the top of it's
case.  Bird won't sell me one unless they install it.  If you have an old
case sitting around or the logo plate that is screwed to the top of the
case and you don't need it, I'd like to buy it from you.  Any help would
be appriciated....

                               Bob.....


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Drew Nichols)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Does this go to Usenet?
Date: 2 Mar 96 22:25:14 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Does this mailing list gateway to usenet?
[e-mail]
Drew Nichols- Department 56 List Manager

**http://www.forthrt.com/~drewcom/dept56/**





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (XoR)
Subject: WTB: Kenwood TH21-AT accessories
Message-ID: <3137137c.179042168@198.190.226.3>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 15:12:35 GMT

Wanted to buy: Any Kenwood TH-21 AT accessories that you might want to
sell. Especially interested in the vinyl case and the HMC-1 headset.
Let me know what you have, the condition and price you want.

Thanks

Dave  KN3ZAN



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kevin Muenzler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 4 Mar 96 15:23:23 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

When *properly tuned* a good tuner will produce about .5db of
insertion loss.  So, the amount of RF power that a tuner
consumes depends on how much power you put into it.

Kevin, WB5RUE
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: CBs
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:07:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4heteu$[e-mail]>
References: <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>

Roger,
I have a couple of nice clean used 40-channel mobile CBs
for sale, one Cobra and one Realistic (Radio Shack) for
$25 each postpaid.  E-mail if interested.

Thanks and 73!        Dean Hemphill, KC5NG
                      [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christer Lindholm)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Manual for Sommerkamp FTDX505
Date: 5 Mar 1996 19:26:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi4h4$[e-mail]>

HELP!
Iwould like to get a copy of the operateurs manual or the service manual for
the old Sommerkamp FTDX505.
Copy and mail costs cherfully coverd.

73 de Chris SM4JFG




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:47 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Kelly Leavitt)
Subject: Icom IC-736 Informat/mods?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Summary: Request for mods to 736
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:12:57 GMT

Anyone have any mods, hits, tips and/or fixes available for the IC-736?
I just purchased one, and would like to learn more about it.

Reply here, or via mail to [e-mail]

Thanks,
73 de Kelly
KB2SYD


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (Fire Fighter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FS 2 Meter Mobile
Date: 6 Mar 1996 18:14:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkkn2$[e-mail]>
References: <4hkkju$[e-mail]>

By the way, I hope I have posted this to the right newsgroup.  If not,
please advise where I can post this!

Thanks,

Dwain
N0MKB



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:48 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 14:52:01 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>  <4hg97g$[e-mail]>


> I believe your final statement is too broad.  You may "preclude others
> from practicing your invention" is closer to the correct formulation.
>
Correct you Charles.

Gerhardt G. Herbst



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:49 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Stephen Lui)
Subject: 800 MHz RX Mod for IC-Z1A
Message-ID: <lui-0403961721170001@192.0.2.1>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 01:21:11 GMT

I downloaded the GIF file with the ICOM mod sheet for the IC-W31A, which
includes mods for 800 MHz RX and out of band TX. Can the IC-Z1A also be
modified to receive 800 MHz? The IC-Z1A and IC-W31A seem pretty similar. I
do have the mod info for out of band TX on the IC-Z1A, but I'd also like
the mod for 800 MHz RX.

Stephen
KF6BTE


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:50 1996
From: "Gregory J. Buhyoff" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT 900 - turning off spontaneously?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 12:27:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4henil$[e-mail]>

Has anyone had a problem with a FT 900 turning spontaneously in an irregular w
ay?
Is there a fix?  Does anyone know which serial numbers (month and year of make
 or
lot numbers) are indicative of this problem if it is, indeed, pervasive?  Than
k you
very much for any repsonses.

Greg Buhyoff
KN4FR




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Swickard)
Subject: RE: Wanted: Tandy Modem
Date: 6 Mar 96 09:17:50 -0800
References: <4hb5kr$[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

I have a Tandy Direct Connection Modem Pack.  It is a 300 baud modem.
 The Radio Shack Catalog Number is 26-2228. This modem has never been
used and is still in the original plastic bag and includes the
manual.  Reply here if interested or email to [e-mail]



                                   73
                                 de KD6FJS


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Douglas R Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco DJ-160
Date: 6 Mar 96 11:20:57 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Can somebody tell me the function of the "Call" button on this HT? Is it for c
alling out
or for someone to call in? I have a few page manual that came with the radio b
ut it
does not adequately explain the function.
Also I need a recommendation as to a book to purchase that explains this stuff
 to
new Hams. Would the "ARRL Operating Manual" explain  all these functions?

Thanks,
Doug
KC8CGX


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (James C. H. Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: HELP: AM & FM signals
Date: 5 Mar 1996 04:23:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgfkc$[e-mail]>

I'm trying to receive an out-of-state but strong signal AM radio station
(WSM-AM in TN to be exact) but have a hard time getting it.  I can do OK
from my car (with a fair amount of fuzz but at least recognizable,
especially at night), but can hardly get it in the house.  I currently
have a loop antenna that came with the stereo attached for AM signals and
a fancy-looking FM antenna that I bought (which helps improve FM signals)
for the FM.  Please, in your E-MAIL, tell me how to improve my reception
in detail but not too technical.  Also, how would I do the same for
distant FM stations?  Thanx to all who helps in advance!


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:54 1996
From: Bill Kirk <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Yaesu Hand Mike for HT
Date: 6 Mar 1996 22:42:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4hl4dc$[e-mail]>

I am looking for a Yaesu hand mike, to work with a Yaesu HT.  Please
advise me direct via E-Mail of price, condx, etc..

Thanx!

73,

Bill  W6RQQ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:56 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 15:00:58 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hg97g$[e-mail]>  <[e-mail]>


> Correct you Charles.
>
> Gerhardt G. Herbst
>
Whoops...I mean correct you are Charles...

Gerhardt



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:57 1996
From: Montbach/Bartlett <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-40 mod info here
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 00:18:32 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h8kjf$[e-mail]>

I found the tx mod for the ft40, it consists of removing a 0 ohm resistor
from the radio. In my attempts to find additional mods, I found another set
of programming parameters. By holding down the lamp, ptt and top-notch
buttons, you bring up some sort of diagnostic mode. It allows you to set the
L1, L2, L3, and high power levels (will tx 7.5 Watts with 13.8v, don't do
this too much, it gets hot) and s1 and s9 levels (don't try to set these
without an accurate signal generator). there are 3 other parameters I haven't
figured out; hssq, thsq, tisq. If anyone finds any other hidden keypad or
jumper mods, let me know. BTW, I also figured out which jumper makes the cpu
think it's a 2mtr radio. 73, Will


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mister Truthful)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Check out the action at http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 03:25:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4hb3em$[e-mail]>

Check out the action at http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/Check out the action at
http://www.txdirect.net/~mrt53/



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:12:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Wallace)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: New HT question...
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 04:05:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4hdf6j$[e-mail]>

I have never bought a new HT, just used ones, and was wondering if
they (such as Yaesu FT530) come with a battery pack (and charger).
This probably sounds dumb, but nowhere in Yaseu's catalog does it
actually say that a lower-voltage pack comes with it...

Please e-mail, and thanks if you answer me...


KB8IFZ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott Poest)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap
Subject: WTB 6 meter rig
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:44:52 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I am interested in buying a 6 meter rig, something inexpensive, just
to start out with.  I've never used 6 meters and am interested in
trying.  Thanks for any info.


- Scott Poest
  KB8KGU  Irving, TX
  Email : [e-mail]
  Web Page : http://www.anet-dfw.com/~spoest



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:01 1996
From: [e-mail]  (Corry Thibault)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Ameritron AL-80B Amplifier
Date: 4 Mar 1996 21:17:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4hfmm4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Corry Thibault)

Hello All,

I have an Ameritron AL-80B Amp for sale, I am asking $700.  The unit is in
mint condition, less than 5 hours use on the tube.  Have manuals and
orginal packaging.

Thanks
Corry - KE1AK
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:02 1996
From: Dave Donkers <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,sci.electronics,equipment,sci.electronics.repair
Subject: WTD: Schematic - SM150 Heath Freq. Ctr.
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 15:06:31 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Greetings --

I am looking for a copy of the schematic or manual for a
Heath/Schlumberger Model SM-150A Frequency Counter,
vintage mid-1970's (from datecodes on chips).

Please reply with possible source or, if you have one, I will pay
copy/postage/fax costs. I am also able to recieve scanned images.

Dave N9FLA


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:03 1996
From: "Thomas C. J. Sefranek" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,alt.radio.swap
Subject: Re: Can I boost the output power of a KW TM-741A?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 11:03:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4h99v9$[e-mail]>
References: <4h8jrj$[e-mail]>

I too have a 741 in my truck.

Why bother?  a 3 db increase is a marginal improvement.
Why did you pick those values?
If I "did" an amplifier it would have to be for 6db or more.
You do realize you will need 3 different amplifiers right?

Tom
WA1RHP




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dave Fortenberry)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info on GE Exec 2 icoms
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 17:14:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4hf8jr$[e-mail]>

Need info on GE Exec 2 icoms. I've heard that other band icoms will
work as well. I've got the 42-50 models of radio and need icoms that
will function properly in them.  Any info you can provide will be
greatly appreciated! I also want to buy at least 4 rx and 4 tx icoms
for these radios, so let me know.

                                       Thanks!

                                     Dave Fortenberry, N6MAI




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:04 1996
From: "Jeffery A. Purtle" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT 900 - turning off spontaneously?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 00:05:15 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4henil$[e-mail]> <4hf9q6$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I had the same problem and know of at least 3 others with that.  My
rig was fixed by having Yaesu do an update on the microprocessor and
a couple other things.  Send it in and insist they fix it.  Mine was
still under warranty.  But, I would be mad if they did not fix that
for free.

73,
AC6IW
--
Jeff Purtle
http://www.smartlink.net/~jpurtle


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Leslie L. Roblin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT411 mods **need help please!!**
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 15:29:33 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hhu92$[e-mail]>

Have a FT411 that I would like to modify for use in the CAP.  Can anyone help
please.

Please e-mail responses.

Thank you.  73's K7PTZ








From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:06 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christer Lindholm)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Manual for Sommerkamp FTDX505
Date: 5 Mar 1996 19:40:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi5as$[e-mail]>

HELP!
Iwould like to get a copy of the operateurs manual or the service manual for
the old Sommerkamp FTDX505.
Copy and mail costs cherfully coverd.
This is the third article I send on the same subject, becauce the two others
have wrong E-mail address (Sorry)

73 de Chris SM4JFG

 [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dave Fortenberry)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Radius P-200 on 6meters? Help!
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 16:51:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkfve$[e-mail]>

Anyone know if the P-200 42-50 mhz model will program up on six
meters?? I have software and RIB, but have not tried it yet. Any
experience with this out there??

                                              Thanks in advance,

                                               Dave






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:07 1996
From: Dave Dredge <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 17:30:30 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hj9vc$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

How could they possibly tell how I programmed the radio.
I have the Yeasu software and every time I have used it
the radio has started doing strange things.

In one case, it would no longer switch to low power.
In another case, even though the freq showed correct in the
display it was 5khz high in memory mode but not in vfo.

I have stopped using the ADMS-1 stuff.

Dave Dredge


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Dixon)
Subject: IC-706
Date: 1 Mar 96 23:31:49 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

I've taken a liking to the idea of getting an IC-706 (and even got
the blessing of the xyl - only the cash to find now!).

I'm getting some info on the machine at present and comments from
those who know the rig.   Today I was told by one person to forget
it, it was deaf on vhf and owners were now encountering faults.
Another person told me he loved the machine but to wait until the
initial bugs had been corrected!

I'd appreciate anyone's thoughts on the IC-706.

73's de Bob GM3ZDH +


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Pasi Tuomi)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Needed: service manual & schema for IC-R100
Date: 1 Mar 1996 10:15:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4h6iou$[e-mail]>

Does anyone have schema and servicemanual for IC-R100 ?
I would like to borrow them and take some copies.

If you have them, please take contact to me !

        Pasi OH3NPS OH5NPS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 Phone:    953 - 4127 400         Addr. Pasi Tuomi, OH5NPS        Finnsonic Oy
 Cellular: 940 - 5041 833               Liesharjunkatu 2 E 37
 Email:    [e-mail]                 53850 Lappeenranta        (Finger for
 WWW:      http://www.lut.fi/~tuomi     Finland                    more info.)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:10 1996
From: "Eric E. Palmer" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: How does a Hammarlund HQ - 180 work?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 14:48:16 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4gt29s$[e-mail]> <4h5n3l$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I am just getting into HAM and a friend just loaned me a
Hammarlund HQ - 180.  It's old, but it seems to work.  I don't know
how to use much of it.  I did find an AM station, but there are
sure a lot of dails and stuff.

Is there anyone out there who has one that could
let me know a little about using it.

Thanks
Eric
http://www.eastnc2.coastalnet.com/~n2b8c6fv/
mailto:[e-mail]"


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:11 1996
From: kmcgrat@goodguy (Kevin McGrath)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom-25H Info
Date: 3 Mar 1996 16:15:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4hcgj5$[e-mail]>



I have recently acquired an Icom-25H mobile transceiver.  This is
an older 2 meter radio and I was wondering if there is anyone out
there that has had some experience in operating it.  I looked
around on the net but could not find any mods for it...such
as extended recieve etc. Anyone have any info?

thanx and 73
kevin
KC7NVR



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (andy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 18:38:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]>

Has anyone found one of those little mini screw-on connectors/adapters
for the C508A antenna jack? Might be nice to try an external antenna
sometime, but I've never seen a connector quite like this one.

BTW...are you as impressed with this unit as I am? The aircraft receive
is the best I've ever heard; it even beats the reception on Standard's
own C288A. Batteries seem to last forever, and it's just not that hard to
get into a repeater with 280 mw. Would have just preferred a normal BNC
antenna connector, though...

-andy, k4adl



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Harrison Cooper)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MT1000 programming
Date: 5 Mar 1996 12:11:53 -0700
Message-ID: <4hi3lp$[e-mail]>
Summary: need info
Keywords: programming,MT1000

Anyone ever built the programming interface for
a Motorola MT1000 ?  The owner has the software
for this, but I am not sure what it really takes
to reprogram this unit.

Please email to [e-mail]

--
| Harrison Cooper                    | email : [e-mail]             |
| Hardware Design                    | Phone : [phone]               |
| Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.  | Radio : N7KST  147.04 R,           |
| Salt Lake City, Utah  84158        | 1G617   Davis County ARES 147.42 S |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jeremy Boot)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WWW Pages Update
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 19:18:14 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Updated and improved for March:

        http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/

Still going strong. SWL Pages included. Lots of visitors worldwide to
date. Keep 'em coming. Support your pages!

73 de
Jeremy G4NJH
[e-mail]
[Home, Am Radio, SWL pages: http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/ ]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (K1EL)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Drake TR4 Audio Problem
Date: 5 Mar 1996 21:18:27 -0500
Message-ID: <4hislj$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (K1EL)

Hi All, I have a problem with my Drake TR4 that I have been fighting for
some time now and can't seem to figure it out. The receiver has good
sensitivity and good quality audio when receiving weak signals. On strong
signals the receiver acts as if it is overloading, distorting badly. I
first thought that the AGC circuit might not be working properly. But in
checking the AGC voltage it looks OK, directly coresponding to signal
strength. Another clue is that the S-meter is deflecting properly which
again tells me the AGC is working OK. I have checked tubes and other
components and can't seem to find anything amiss. Any ideas would be
greatly appreciated

Thanks es 73s de Steve K1EL


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Raymond A. Brown)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: New RS rig?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 21:39:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4haf6e$[e-mail]>
References: <4gucu6$[e-mail]>

JRW ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Anybody heard anything about the new HTX-242? I's been assuming it was a
: dual-band mobile, but a RS store manager told me today that it's simply the
: HTX-212 with a new model designation & catalog number! Anyone know the facts
?

  No, I don't. YET. :-)

  I've heard the same rumor, but I've also heard that RS was supposedly
putting out a dual-band PORTABLE as well. Now, THAT would be interesting! :-)

                                                _Ray_   KB0STN




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:16 1996
From: KF5KF (Robert Redoutey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom IC 736 Question
Date: 1 Mar 1996 18:49:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4h7gr3$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have a IC 736. When the volume is down all the way, I still get a hiss
from the speaker. Is this normal? I have not had chance to hear anybody's
736 to see if it does the same thing or not.

Is this normal for this rig, before I send it back?

Thanks,

Bob Redoutey
KF5KF
Round Rock, TX
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:17 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 22:00:41 GMT

No problem with mic gain here. I get excellent reports and I don't have a
loud voice. I use the little mobile mike that came with it. You must talk
real close to it to get much of a meter kick but thats to be expected
with a mobile mic. 73



: 73
: Scott  KD6CQ
: [e-mail]

--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anton HOLLAUS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC 706
Date: 2 Mar 1996 14:07:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4h9kn3$[e-mail]>
References: <4f9col$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Re: IC 706  TX on VHF

every litle Handy from Standard send from 110 to 170 MHz !
In europe can every without liz buy it !!!
Why is ICOM with the 706 so poor ??
politicle ?
I think a relais or a transistor bring the same, but who knows ?

best reg.


dd 0 yq (i have also Air and Sea liz)



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:19 1996
From: Stan Witherspoon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB Manual for Atlas 210X
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 10:39:59 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am looking for a copy of an Atlas 210X operating & Service manual or
pointers on where I could get one. I remember a company called HI
manuals, but I have no other info.

73
stan

--
---  Stan Witherspoon  N6SCE     -----          Disclaimer           ---
-    Systems Technology Div.       -   These are my personal opinions  -
-    Hewlett Packard Company       -   and do not represent the views  -
-    8000 Foothills Blvd. MS 5596  -   of anyone or anything else.     -
---  Roseville,Ca.95747-5596     -----    [e-mail]  ---


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed Gallup)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola HF gear?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 18:48:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi2og$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hetck$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hgn34$[e-mail]>


>>> Motorola did manufacture HF equipment, for the Military.
>>> Examples are the old R-390 / R-392 series of receivers.
>
>>They also manufactured later models called Micom stations/mobiles.
>
>>Very similar to the mocom series radios.

      Just to make it perfectly clear, Motorola STILL manufactures a very
modern channelized, synthesized, high power HF SSB radio under the Micom name.

 Model number begins with T80,  but I can't remember the rest at the moment.

   Ed  WB6SAT  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:21 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Stephen Lui)
Subject: Re: IC-W31A: Mods?
Message-ID: <lui-0403961309540001@192.0.2.1>
References: <[e-mail]> <4h4qvs$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 21:09:51 GMT

In article <4h4qvs$[e-mail]>, climber@tetons (John Smith) wrote:

> Attached is a gif file containing enough information to mod a w31a
> for extended receive and transmit. As it includes cell and public
> bands this mod should only be done to ht's being used to test
> other equipment. The quality of the scanned picture is low, but
> the mods can be done with the info supplied.
>
> begin 644 ICOM.GIF

Does this apply to the IC-Z1A too?

Stephen


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 13:37:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4hmp0u$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <1996Mar5.000656.1@ssrl01> <4hhc6u$[e-mail]>

   "Thomas C. J. Sefranek" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Clearly a case of opportunism.  Ah well Bill Gates can do it, why not
>this turkey?

Bill Gates' success year after year is NOT the result of taking undue
advantage of some helpless victim.

Perhaps opportunism is just another catch-all phrase coined so the
have-nots could better antagonize the haves?

73,
Jack WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:23 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Feustel)
Subject: Re: Icom IC 736 Question
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h7gr3$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 12:39:36 GMT

Robert Redoutey (KF5KF) wrote:
: I have a IC 736. When the volume is down all the way, I still get a hiss
: from the speaker. Is this normal? I have not had chance to hear anybody's
: 736 to see if it does the same thing or not.

: Is this normal for this rig, before I send it back?

I think this may be normal for digital receivers. Even my portable
am/fm radio does that.
--
[e-mail]
Dave Feustel N9MYI      For PGP Public Key, finger [e-mail]
Fort Wayne, IN          Or else access http://www.mixi.net/~feustel/
219-483-1857


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:24 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: IC-706
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 15:18:18 GMT

I've got one and love it. When they say deaf on VHF they are talking
about spectrum outside of the ham bands for which the radio was not
designed to receive. It's very hot on 2 meters! I don't think you have
much to worry about.


: I'm getting some info on the machine at present and comments from
: those who know the rig.   Today I was told by one person to forget
: it, it was deaf on vhf and owners were now encountering faults.
: Another person told me he loved the machine but to wait until the
: initial bugs had been corrected!

--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:24 1996
From: lcarpent@freenet (Lennard Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: C.P.I. Radios
Date: 2 Mar 1996 05:05:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8ku4$[e-mail]>

  Looking for info on Communicatiosn Power Inc CB radios.


--

         //               Amiga Corporation!
        //              The Buttheads Blew IT!
    \\ //                    Len Carpenter
     \X/            ( [e-mail] )
                 A Believer in Welland, Ontario Canada






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay Kesterson K0GU)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Date: 4 Mar 1996 16:05:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4hf4cf$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

On a somewhat related subject. My 706 has rated output on HF and VHF
in the CW mode. However on SSB it only puts out about 30/40 watts on
HF and ~4 watts on 2m. If I whistle in the mike I get near CW output
but speech, no matter what the volume, produces the lower output.
The mike seems OK, turning the mike gain up doesn't make much difference
after level 2 or 3 and the processor only helps a little. ALC levels
seem normal and the 706 output meter indicates power out. I have tried
it on two good power supplies. Don't think it is pilot error. Any ideas
out there? ICOM tech support says send it back.

Does the 706 have a internal SSB power adjustment like some radios (my
old TS-930 had one)? How much does your unit put out on SSB?

73, Jay  K0GU                  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rval58)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu Relay - Will this work??
Date: 4 Mar 1996 16:39:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4hfnui$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rval58)

I plan to setup a relay on my FT-1000 -- Does this sound like it'll work
OK?? :

 Get multi contact 12VDC Relay.
 Connect one leg of coil to center pin +13.5VDC output  jack on back of
radio.
 Connect other leg to center pin of TX GND jack on radio.

When PTT activates, relay should activate, and I can make various
connections, eg , 117VAC on air light, rcvr muting to boatanchors, etc..

This will work, won't it?  I assume TX/GND is a relay contact to GND. Just
looking for a confirmation from anyone, don't want to fry things.
 - Thanks!   N1SQJ


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:27 1996
From: mike guest <[e-mail]@pop.clandjop.com>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom-25H Info
Date: 5 Mar 1996 21:14:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4hias6$[e-mail]>
References: <4hcgj5$[e-mail]>
To: kmcgrat@goodguy

expanded rf
1. set offset to 0.0
2. select vfo (a)
3. press and hold [sim/dup] and [nor/rev]
4. dial in desired frequency
5. release [simp/dup]button
6. select the other vfo (b)
7. repeat steps 3,4 and 5
   if vfo (b) can not be set, transfer vfo (a)to vfo (b) usinf
   the [wtite] button as described on page 7, item 6, of the
   owners manual.
8. If the tuning knob is turned again, the radio will revert
   back within the normal band range.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:29 1996
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail]
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 08:44:20 PDT
References: <[e-mail]>

Paul,

That's a very blatent claim you make. This patent went through with only
one need for clarification from the PTO. Obviously know one else sought
such a patent which is evidence by the PTO issuing me patent # 5457342.

Those companies you mention have devices that are similar with respect to
cooling only if you care to follow the patents mentioned on my abstract.
However, NONE have developed the device I have NOR do they have a patent
on such a device. As such, I am the sole owner to pursue development of
this product or companies under infringement.

Gaerhardt G. Herbst



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (bill furneaux)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-706 vhf mods
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 13:52:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4hc4mh$[e-mail]>

I have just got a ic706 and have performed the hf and vhf rx mods but
does anyone have the mods to open the tx outside the 2 metre band i
see the tx led lights but no output. anyother mods or un documented
info on the ic706 would be great!!

thanks in advance

bill        [e-mail]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bye
        Bill
                       E-Mail [e-mail]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert J. Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Esoteric Wind-Up Radio
Date: 2 Mar 96 23:38:00 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960302183122.21983A-100000@DGS>


I know that it isn't REALLY ham radio, but I can across a review of a
really exotic wind-up AM-FM-SW radio in the February 1996 issue of Short
Wave Magazine (UK).  Coverage is 520-1600 AM, 88-108 FM, and 3 -12 MHz SW
(AM).  The radio, the BayGen Freeplay, was designed in the UK and is made
in South Africa for use in very poor countries where even batteries are
too expensive or hard to get.  It can be bought in the UK with proceeds
being used to give away radios in poor parts of Africa.  After 60 turns of
the crank, the radio plays for 30 or 40 minutes!

This is NOT a joke.

  73 de Bob w3otc



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (James C. H. Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.broadcasting
Subject: HELP: AM & FM signals
Date: 6 Mar 1996 01:27:29 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hipm1$[e-mail]>



A question for all you radio experts out there.  I am trying to receive
an out-of-state but fairly strong AM signal (WSM-AM in Nashville to be
exact) and do okay at night (though fuzzy) if I'm driving but have hard
time getting it in the house.  My stereo currently has a loop antenna
that came from with it (which I attached for AM) and a FM stereo antenna
that I brought which helps with FM reception.  I want to know how can I
improve my AM reception 24 hours (other than attaching an antenna onto my
roof).  How would I do the same for distant FM signals?  Please in your
e-mail,  be detailed but not too technical.  Thanx to all who help in
advance!




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (jmleveron)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mods for Kenwood TH-79A(D)
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 09:21:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4h98so$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2802960856470001@192.0.2.1>

Hi,
   [e-mail] (Stephen Lui) wrote:
>I've read the modification files for the Kenwood TH-79A(D) on
>oak.oakland.edu and wanted to know if anyone knew of any more mods,
namely
>keyboard mods which don't require the unit to be opened up. Also, if
>anyone has any comments on this unit, they would be appreciated. I'll
>probably place an order from one in the next few days from AES.
>
>Stephen

I've never been able to find any mods other than those either;
if anyone has the keypad mods, -please- share them with us!

John.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Icom W21AT Wide RX problem..
Date: 5 Mar 1996 05:08:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgi8o$[e-mail]>

I have done the keypad mod for extended RX, but it doesn't recieve much.
I read on an FTP site that this it the way to do it. However, at a local
repair shop, I was able to view a mod book for Icom radios. It cites the
addition of D-23 (MA132WK) as the RF expansion mod. Has anyone tried
this? Is it possible that Icom has stopped including this in the W21AT
radios? I know the keypad mod works on the earlier models..... Perhaps
they no longer include this diode. In the book, it said to do the keypad
mod only AFTER inserting the diode/ So, maybe mine TUNES out of band, but
requires a diode to actually RECIEVE out of band.. Any experience with this?


Nate, KB9LSX

Thanks alot!



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike James)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706 Mods for sale? (Packet fwd)
Date: 2 Mar 1996 21:40:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4haf8s$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4h28q7$[e-mail]> <4h2i37$[e-mail]>

I am also interested in your eval of the 706.
Thanks!

Mike James
KE0CH

> Sorry - I have the location of the IC-706 mods (I performed a
>couple last night) and my evaluation of the rig's performance with the
>mods...
>
>Regards,
>
>Michael/KG7M
>



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:37 1996
From: Jeff Clark <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ft-530: Safe to use "AA" nicads with batt. case?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 01:16:30 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I recently bought the "AA" battery case as a cheap backup battery for my
Yaesu ft-530 with the idea that I would fill it with Ni-cad "AA"s.
Unfortunately the manual indicates that the case "lacks the necessary
thermal & over-current protection circuits..." & "must not be used with
rechargable cells".

I'm assuming that it is safe to use "AA" nicads for Rx/Tx but that Yaesu
would rather I didn't charge the cells while attached to the radio (via
the external DC jack on top of the case) because the case lacks a current
limiting circuit.

Does anyone have any experience with Ni-cads & the FBA-12 battery case?

73
Jeff - KF6BKG, listening


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:38 1996
From: "Thomas C. J. Sefranek" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: 5 Mar 1996 12:31:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhc6u$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <1996Mar5.000656.1@ssrl01>

Westinghouse Semiconductor DOES indeed have a patent on TE coolers.
(I don't know if they even exist anymore...)
I have a large (4"-4" plate) made by them and it has a patent number on
it.  It has a nice fan on the back for moving the heat and embedded
thermocouples for reading the two sides of the junction.

I have used these devices at MIT for over 20 years now, and I'm curious
as to the patent system that is being used by this guy who obviously had
NO interest in the origional development of the device.  Clearly a case
of opportunism.  Ah well Bill Gates can do it, why not this turkey?

Tom
WA1RHP




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:39 1996
From: Jeff Clark <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Late model FT-530 mods?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:06:29 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hgboh$[e-mail]>

Robyn Lyn Lempicki (aka Gerry) wrote:
>
> Hi!  I just got a new FT-530.  According to the mod that I found while
> searching the net, there is one solder pad (#13) to open up.  My radio looks
 a
> bit different inside...I had a green wire that was just begging to be cut, s
o
> I did it!  It looks like that enabled airband rx.  Does anyone know how to g
et
> 800-950mhz rx?  How abt extended tx? -Gerry

Will knowlegable parties please post this info to the group or my email addres
s.
 I just bought one of the late model ft-530s as well and am interested in the
extended tx mod.  It sure is different in there...

thanks & 73
jeff, kf6bkg
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Zack Widup)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 8250 UART chip
Date: 7 Mar 1996 05:11:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlr5s$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk4mq$[e-mail]> <4hj1lm$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Zack Widup)


In a previous article, [e-mail] (DykstraR) says:

>It's made by National Semiconductor, part number INS5820.  Also B and C
>versions.                                           ^^^^
>
>Western Digital made a WD8250, which might be the same part
>
>Rick  KD8CP
>

I think you meant INS8250. Yes, it is the same as the WD8250 UART.

Zack W9SZ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-W31A/IC-Z1A CTSS Decode and Tone Squelch Standard?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 00:39:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4h85cc$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1> <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Richard Helton) writes:
>Stephen Lui ([e-mail]) wrote:
>:The HRO ad says that the IC-W31A and IC-Z1A both come standard withe 2.5
>:watts of power and CTSS decode standard, with the BP-180 battery. Does
>:this mean that they include the UT-94/UT-93 modules and also come withe
>:tone squelch, pocket beep, and tone scan? Is tone squelch controlled by a
>:CTSS tone or is like the DTMF paging feature of the FT-51R?
>:Stephen
>The tone option is included in the US model.  I don't have my manuel here
>but I beleive it does all the above.. I just bought mine about a month
>ago and haven't tried out everything yet.
>[e-mail]

And ICOM has announced a $100 direct rebate on the Z1A.

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 445.3MHz When in Los Angeles UPDATE
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:39:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi1sn$[e-mail]>

Thanks, Bill!

That should read:

Guests are welcome on  445.3MHz (down 5 MHz) with a 100Hz P.L.

My System is located on the very top of Palos Verdes.  The System 'sees'
San Diego (I've used it in Ensenada) to Riverside, up to Santa Barbara and
beyond!

I would like to hear from licensed  rec.radio.amature.equipment
subscribers; check in!

Tony Cardenas
WA6IGJ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]> <4hht71$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 20:19:58 GMT

In article <4hht71$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Manny Tau, Psy.D.
) writes:
>I believe that Comet makes an aftermarket antenna for the 508a
>utilizing this SMA connector.  It's a little bigger than the stock,
>and I saw it at HRO.

It's a *lot* bigger than stock (15 inches), but it works *great*,
especially out of the ham bands where the stock antenna really
falls on its face.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Silverwood)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
Subject: Good set of headphones
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 21:38:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4hicb4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have been using a pair of Archer (Radio Shack) lightweight mono
headphones for SWL and ham work, but they are getting a little worn.  I
would like to get a better set of headphones -- mono, general purpose for
both SWL and ham use -- but would like to find out what others are using
and get their recommendations.  Any comments, feedback etc. will be greatly
appreciated.  Thanks in advance.


-- //Steve//

Computer Associates    CompuServe: 76703,3035
Fax: [phone]      Internet: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]    America Online: KB6OJS
Homepage: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/KB6OJS
Personal homepage: http://www.earthlink.net/~kb6ojs



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tony S.)
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 04:41:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8j97$[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>

This set is most likely the SX-16 or SX-17 Super Skyrider, circa 1939.
I'm working on a SX-17 now - it's a super radio, just like it says! A
cabinet was made for the set, as I have one with mine, but a cabinet
for most of the Hallicrafters models of that year will fit.

I would value this radio, with cabinet, at $125 to $175, depending
upon condition and the desire of the buyer.

Enjoy the Super Skyrider.

73 de N8SNC, Tony







From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:46 1996
From: bobby kennon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: ICOM-740 HF RIG.
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 16:01:51 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

FS 1 EA ICOM IC-740  SSB/CW  100 WATTS
IT HAS THE FOLLOWING INSTALLED:
1.  PS-35 INTERNAL POWER SUPPLY
2.  EX-241 MARKER UNIT
3.  EX-242 FM UNIT.
4.  EX-243 KEYER UNIT.
5.  FL-44/FL-45 FILTERS.
6.  OPERATES ON AC/DC, A NICE CLEAN RIG READY TO OPERATE.

ASKING $550.00 AND I WILL SHIP WITH IN THE US....

BOB KD6MN/318-949-4047
E-MAIL [e-mail]
--
MZÉ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:47 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (M. Davies)
Subject: How do I program an ICOM U400 mobile?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (M. Davies)
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 15:39:47 GMT


I'm sure it's with the keys and not a RIB box, but that's all I know!
Any ideas?




                                                 MD




--
"The State has a superfluity of testicles" | "In her first passion woman
                                           | loves her lover, in all the
                                           | others all she loves is love."



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:48 1996
From: "C. J. Hawley" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: info-B.T.I. 3-1000 linear amp
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 14:06:28 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Looking for info on B.T.I 3-1000 linear(s). A friend W9OTN has one with a 3-10
00 chimney,
air variables, model # LK-2000, and serial #1844. He is wondering how one tell
s if you
have the hvy dty power supply, and what other variations there were of these a
mps from
the Brad Thompson Industries. He heard that there was a variation with vacuum
variables
in it. He would like to hear of anything anyone knows and would like to obtain
 a manual
or a copy of one for this amplifier.
73, Thankyou.
--


Charles Jack Hawley Jr.
Amateur Radio KE9UW (A.K.A. 'Chuck' in Ham Radio)
BMW K100RS, BMWMOA #224 (A.K.A. 'Jack' in Motorcycles)
[e-mail]
Sr. Research Engineer Emeritus
Univ of Ill, Urbana-Champaign



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael T. Hodgson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola HF gear?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 03:02:43 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hetck$[e-mail]>

In article <4hetck$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (D W
Hemphill KC5NG) wrote:

> Motorola did manufacture HF equipment, for the Military.
> Examples are the old R-390 / R-392 series of receivers.

They also manufactured later models called Micom stations/mobiles.

Very similar to the mocom series radios.

Mike

--
Mike - Raleigh, NC USA

Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not in any way
represent those of my employer.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Roger W Sellers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-W31A/IC-Z1A CTSS Decode and Tone Squelch Standard?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 06:36:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgncn$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1>


In article <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1>, [e-mail]₧ says...
>
>The HRO ad says that the IC-W31A and IC-Z1A both come standard withe 2.5
>watts of power and CTSS decode standard, with the BP-180 battery. Does
>this mean that they include the UT-94/UT-93 modules and also come withe
>tone squelch, pocket beep, and tone scan? Is tone squelch controlled by a
>CTSS tone or is like the DTMF paging feature of the FT-51R?
>
>Stephen

No there is an optional tone board (the UT-93) I believe that is required for
that. Dealer was selling for 75-90 I thought.

Roger
KB9LBU



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:51 1996
From: Leila Henderson <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: When does the Foothill College Swap in Los Altos, CA, start?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 04:27:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8inj$[e-mail]>
References: <4gd2lf$[e-mail]> <4h5ulh$[e-mail]> <4h63tj$[e-mail]>

: Title says it all. . . .

: I think it starts back up on March 9th, but I want to confirm (I live 5
: hours away so I don't want to find an empty parking lot when I get
: there!

: Thanks!!!

: John
: KE6TGN

   The Foothill Electronic Flea Market is held the second Saturday of
each month from March thru September. The first one is March 9th

   "Le" KB6MXH




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Fred Allen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom/kenwood
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 20:57:25 -0100

For sale:
Icom IC-R700 receiver.        25mhz-999.999mhz, 1.025ghz-1.999.999ghz.
 Box and manual.  Good condition $825.00
****
Icom TV-R7000 tv adapter for above.  New in box.  $200.00
****
Icom IC-CK70 DC cable kit for IC-R7000.  New in box $25.00
****
Kenwood R-600 shortwave receiver.  No manual.  Good condition.
$275.00
****
Kenwood R-1000 shortwave receiver.  No manual.        Good condition.
$295.00
****
Call Fred KA0YAE, 612-588-6898.  Better off to call, as I don't log on
too often.




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Sorsby)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: HELP! with TS-520S cw receive
Date: 1 Mar 1996 19:26:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4h7j09$[e-mail]>
References: <4h5046$[e-mail]>

In article <4h5046$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>...  When receiving in the CW mode, I can hear a station, and if I
>tune up the band, I hear the same station 2 KHz up frequency, from
>center to center.


Jeff, it sounds to me like your rig has both the upper and lower sideband
carrier oscillators turned on simultaneously.  That's the only thing that
comes to mind which could cause the sort of problem you've described.

I don't have any Kenwood gear so I can't provide any hardware troubleshooting
tips.  Hpoefully someone else will step forward with more details.  Good
luck.


Regards,
Bill Sorsby, N5BU



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RFI Proof Paint Available?
Date: 4 Mar 96 03:25:33 -0800
Message-ID: <1996Mar4.032533.1@ssrl01>
References: <4h8k9g$[e-mail]>

Zack Schindler, N8FNR ([e-mail]) asked:

   > Does anyone out there know of any company that produces a
   > paint that reduces RFI?

How about emulsified copper head gasket spray paint?  You get it
from auto parts stores.

I've never tried it for RFI shielding, but it may be a quick
solution to your problem -- spray it on and ground it.  Easy to
check with an ohmmeter to see whether or not the binder prevents
adjacent particles from conducting.

If you try it, let us know if it works!

--
-Craig Haggart, KC6VHO
 [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Henry van Cleef)
Subject: Re: Hallicrafters Super Skyrider - Follow-up
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hf7od$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 15:52:23 GMT

In article <4hf7od$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (D. R
agsdale) writes:
>Many, many thanks to all those who replied to my attempt to ID this
>radio.  It is a SX-17 - crystal filter, noise limiter, 13 tubes - but
>the tube line-up does not match exactly with the references given.  The
>"Moore" book apparently lists 2 - 6J5 tubes, mine only has one but has
>a 6H6 that isn't listed.  I'm sure the correct tubes are in it, since
>the tubes nos. are stamped into the tube sockets.  Would a 6H6 be a
>logical substitution to do the same thing a 6J5 might do?
>
The 6H6 is the logical tube for either a series or parallel noise
limiter.  I suspect that the listing in Moore is incorrect.

--
===================================================================
Hank van Cleef                                The Union Institute
        E-mail [e-mail] or [e-mail]
===================================================================



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed Velez)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 04:38:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4h8jdf$[e-mail]>
References: <4h63or$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] wrote:

>I've been hearing about another store other then Barry's in NYC. Can
>anyone give me  Name and Address ( maybe even a telephone number too.)
>????
> Thanks.

For those interested in getting a better deal then Barry Electronics
head over to:

KJI Electronics in Cedar Grove NJ
K2KJI Gene
[phone]
Mon-Fri 7pm to 10pm
Sar noon to 5pm
Sun 1pm to 5pm

Call first.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Kolb)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What ever happened to...RDF
Date: 3 Mar 1996 19:04:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4hcqgl$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4grdhc$[e-mail]>

Richard Dowling ([e-mail]) wrote:
: [e-mail] (Roger N. Hoffeditz) wrote:
: >Marine RDF's seem to have gone by the window of time. Everytime I go to
: >a boat show, I always ask for them. The answer seems to be "If you had

I picked up the loop section of a Lear Ferro-Dynamic loop at
the swap meet yesterday. Model 2320-C. Schematic # 701003,
Assembly # 700939-03.

Can anyone help me out with a schematic so that I can try to control
it remotely.

Has a beautiful ferrite bar in it. 2" x 6" x 1/4". Should make
a heck of an antenna for some freq range.

Thanks for any help.





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (James A. Nitzberg)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: CBs
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:33:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4heuvt$[e-mail]>
References: <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>

In article <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>I'm lookin around for some low cost cb with a range of a couple of
>miles. Anybody got any suggestions ?
>

Roger:

I've had good luck with both Radio Shack and Midland equipment.  Cost:  betwee
n
$50 and $300 depending upon features, etc.  Your basic $50 radio gives you 40
channels.  Add between $20 and $50 for a basic antenna and you have reliable
communication for between 5 and 50 miles, depending up terrain, band
conditions, elevation, etc.

Good Luck.

[Jim Nitzberg      WX3B]
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:58 1996
From: Mike Willis <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 10:16:08 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hf4cf$[e-mail]>

Jay Kesterson K0GU wrote:
>
> On a somewhat related subject. My 706 has rated output on HF and VHF
> in the CW mode. However on SSB it only puts out about 30/40 watts on
> HF and ~4 watts on 2m. If I whistle in the mike I get near CW output
> but speech, no matter what the volume, produces the lower output.
> The mike seems OK, turning the mike gain up doesn't make much difference
> after level 2 or 3 and the processor only helps a little. ALC levels
> seem normal and the 706 output meter indicates power out. I have tried
> it on two good power supplies. Don't think it is pilot error. Any ideas

What do you expect! In SSB mode, the peak power is indeed 100W. With
speech, the average duty cycle is something like 25%. With a processor
or by shouting you can get this up to maybe 40%. Whistles are tones at
the peak power, hence you see 100W. Unless you use a peak reading power
meter, you will not see the actual peak power on SSB, but some average
determined by the dynamics of the power meter.

Mike


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:13:59 1996
From: Charles Bolland <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.noncomm,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: Stand Alone Broadcast Radio Station Database - LW,MW,SW
Date: 2 Mar 1996 21:35:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4haeue$[e-mail]>
References: <4gttsh$[e-mail]> <4gvda8$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Friends,

I'm still sending out the Stand Alone Broadcast Radio Station Database to
whomever wants it.  I would like your mailing address and Email address
for registration and possibly a future letter describing a more
comprehensive database program for radio.  All information will be kept
confidential..

Just answer this posting to "[e-mail]".

The database has more than 4,000 records already and can be edited and
updated.

Hope to hear from you.

Chuck
KA4PRF




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ATTN: JOHN ENGLISH
Date: 5 Mar 1996 18:48:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi2ap$[e-mail]>


this is to [e-mail]:

You asked me to email my phone # in reference to the TH-77, and I have
emailed you many times. However, you did mention that you had problems
with your internet server, so if you see this, either call me at:

(414)-486-1516, or email me...

Thanks,


Nate, KB9LSX

([e-mail])
(http://www.uwm.edu/~herb)





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:02 1996
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
From: [e-mail] (James D. Cronin)
Subject: Cold fusion superconducting antennas (was: Announsing...)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hfqtn$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 17:27:42 GMT

In article <[e-mail]>,
Wes Stewart <[e-mail]> wrote:
>...
>"Announsing", "blatent" and "know one else" indeed. I don't know what his
>device is,  because searching for the number didn't work for me. Sounds like
a
>Peltier device, but I guess it could be cold fusion.
>
>73, Wes -- N7WS

Isn't it obvious:

Homebrew superconducting cold fusion ham radio astronomy antenna
equipment with investment potential for insider stock trader Canadians.
(Apoligies in advance to our friends in VE land...)

Ten points to the first person who cross-posts all this stuff to the
alt.sex hierarchy.  April 1 is closer than you think.

73...Jim  N2VNO


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:03 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Sam Lightbourne)
Subject: Re: IC-W31A/IC-Z1A CTSS Decode and Tone Squelch Standard?
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 21:41:51 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1>

Stephen Lui ([e-mail]) wrote:
: The HRO ad says that the IC-W31A and IC-Z1A both come standard withe 2.5
: watts of power and CTSS decode standard, with the BP-180 battery. Does
: this mean that they include the UT-94/UT-93 modules and also come withe
: tone squelch, pocket beep, and tone scan? Is tone squelch controlled by a
: CTSS tone or is like the DTMF paging feature of the FT-51R?

: Stephen


According to the manual, the UT-94 module is already installed
in the USA version. It controls the tone squelch
operation, the pocket beep and the tone scan functions.

The code squelch function is controlled by DTMF.

--
[e-mail]
Sam (ki4jj)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Matt C. Brinkhoff)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu MD-1 Question
Date: 2 Mar 1996 20:19:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4haafp$[e-mail]>

I recently purchased a used Yaesu MD-1 at a hamfest.  It seems the audio is
a bit low on the mic - unless I talk about 1/2-1" away from the mic it
barely moves the power out meter.

I have previously used the HM-1 hand mic and a preamplified (turner) mic
with the rig, both of which produced quite a bit of movement on the meter
when I was speaking (SSB, of course.)

The rig is a FT767GX.

Is this normal for a MD-1, or is there something wrong?  (Before you ask,
the switch is in the 600 ohm position.)

Thanks.

--
Matt C. Brinkhoff, KB0RXC
[e-mail]
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/mbrinkho
Lincoln, Nebraska [EN10]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:05 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202 birdie fix, HELP!, RS claims no fixes...
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Fred McKenzie)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 13:32:22 -0500
References: <4h4jqj$[e-mail]>

In article <4h4jqj$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jim Smith) wrote:
> Just got off the phone with a Radio Shack technician. He said he was unaware
> of any fixes for the birdie problem this radio has.

Jim-

The HTX-202 CPU clock crystal is 3.579545 MHz, which is the standard TV
colorburst frequency.  It was chosen so it could be used both as the CPU
clock, and for the Touchtone generator.  The 41st harmonic falls close to
the output of a 146.76 MHz repeater.  Is that the birdie you refer to?  I
doubt anything can be done to eliminate it, other than to move its
frequency away from 146.76.

I recall that someone claimed to have had their radio replaced with one
that didn't have the birdie. Perhaps there is a newer version of the
HTX-202, that uses a different scheme, or has better internal shielding.
You might get a Radio Shack clerk to let you check a new one from a recent
shipment.

73, Fred, K4DII


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:06 1996
From: PHIL DIAZ <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FOR SALE ICOM IC211 2 METER ALL MODE
Date: 4 Mar 1996 02:16:00 -0700
Message-ID: <4heccg$[e-mail]>
To: all

HI EVERYONE,
 I COULDN'T FIND MY LISTING,SO I'M POSTING IT AGAIN. IF THIS IS POSTED
MORE THAN ONCE, WOULD YOU PLEASE REPLY TO LET ME KNOW?

ANYWAY I POSTED AN ICOM IC211 2 METER ALL MODE TRANCEIVER, IT HAS THE
FOLLOWING:
- THE UNIT IS AC AND DC
- IT HAS THE VARIABLE COMSPEC TE-32 PL TONE ENCODER
- AN ICRM2 REMOTE CONTROLLER KEYPAD FOR PUNCHING IN THE FREQUENCY
- AN ICOM DESK MICROPHONE
- OWNERS MANUAL AND SCHEMATICS FOR BOTH THE RADIO AND THE REMOTE KEYPAD

 IT IS IN EXCELENT CONDITION FUNCTIONALLY AND COSMETICALLY.
 I AM POSTING THIS FOR KC7KZT A FELLOW HAM THAT DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO
THE NET AS WE DO. HE IS ASKING $400 FOR IT , HIS PHONE #[phone].
OR YOU CAN E-MAIL ME AT [e-mail]. AND I WILL RELAY ANY MESSAGES TO
HIM VIA THE RADIO.
                     THANK YOU, I HOPE THIS ONE POSTS!
                            PHIL



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Wes Stewart)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:06:25 LOCAL
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hdlvj$[e-mail]>

In article <4hdlvj$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Paul Laughton) write
s:
>From: [e-mail] (Paul Laughton)
>Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
>Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 02:54:14 GMT

>[e-mail] wrote:


[blah,blah... deleted]

>I wonder how Mr Herbst slipped this one past the prior art
>investigation? This technology has been around since the early 70's -
>at least. For example, IBM and Amdahl main frames made extensive use
>of it.

Simple. He reinvented it first!






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gordon Fuller)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need suggestion on 2 meter all mode mobile
Date: 5 Mar 96 18:19:15 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9603051011.A8692-0100000@netcom18>
References: <[e-mail]>

I have been using a Yaesu FT-290 R for years.  It is no longer in
production but if you can find a used one around, it should be pretty
cheap. Only bad point is it is very low power. I drive a B108 amp and they
put out about 10 watts.  It has been enough power to work AO-13 with my CX14
KLM 2 mtr. beam.  I also work packet (FM) with MIR etc.  Hope this helps.
73 Gordy [e-mail]

                                             [e-mail]

On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Kevin Muenzler wrote:

> Does anyone have any suggestions for a 2 meter all mode
> portable/mobile rig?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin, WB5RUE
> [e-mail]
> [e-mail]
>
>


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:09 1996
From: Shelley Dianne Shay <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Yaesu FT-5100
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 06:23:26 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am selling my Yaesu Mobile Dual Band Radio.
I have used it 3 times.  I bought it new and it is still in brand new
condition.  I have the original box & owner's manual.
I paid $628 for it, will sell for $500 o.b.o. and will throw in a
dual-band mag-mount antenna.

If you'd like to see a picture of it, and/or read some of the features,
check out my web page at:

http://www.unt.edu/~shelley/goodies/electronics.html

If interested, please email me at:

[e-mail]

73
-Shelley Shay
KC5DAZ




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Fire Fighter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FS 2 Meter Mobile
Date: 7 Mar 1996 03:48:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlman$[e-mail]>
References: <4hkkju$[e-mail]>

The radio has been sold...Thanks to all who responded!





Fire Fighter ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Hello...If anyone is interested, I have a 2 meter mobiel radio for sale.
: It is the Radio Shack HTX-212.  I know it is not the best radio on the
: market, but it is a great starter radio.  It works great and was not used
: much over a year.  I have the mounting hardware and the owners manual to
: go with it.  I am asking $150.00, or best offer.

: It is in great condition.  Please let me know if anyone is interested.
: You can send email to [e-mail]

: Thanks,

: Dwain



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:11 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Front end on DJ580 blown, ideas?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 17:57:48 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Wal
ter R Francis) writes:
>
>I forgot to disconnect/turn off my HT hooked up to a mobile antenna, and
>transmitted 50 watts out of another mobile antenna 1 1/2 feet away.  Now the
>receive is severely attenuated on 2M, works fine on transmitting both bands
>and receives fine on 440 (had it on single band mode, if that mattered)..
>
>Anyone have suggestions, besides sending it to Alinco?  I assume it's most
>likely a pretty complicated problem, transister or so chewed apart.
>
>Any and all help appreciated.  *sigh*

Sounds like you fried the front end all right. If you consider replacing
a transistor a complicated problem, you'd better send it to Alinco.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:12 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Intermod Probs
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:11:53 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>I have a Kenwood 733A and get serious intermod problems on 2 meters.
>Is this characteristic of most dual band rigs?  Is there anything I
>can do with the antenna to reject some of the intermod?  Thanks.

It's characteristic of the Kenwood (and to be fair of some others
as well). There are two solutions. There are bandpass filters
sold by Tucker and Alabama Radio that will limit the out of band
crud from reaching  your radio. Of course you can only receive
2m signals then, but at least the howling monster is tamed. There
is also a notch filter available that will kill just the pager
segment of VHF. If it's pagers driving you mad, this may give you
some relief. I don't recall the manufacturer, but they advertise
in QST. In any case, these filters go in the transmission line
between the radio and the antenna.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:13 1996
From: [e-mail](Kevin Karamanos )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: 6 Mar 1996 06:05:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4hj9vc$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

WARNING......

If you use EZ Clone or another external software other than the
recommended ADMS-1 software, you may find that your warranty is void on
your FT-51R.

Why take the risk?????



In <[e-mail]> tomching <[e-mail]> writes:

>
>You can not enter RX frequency greater than 470 MHz on ADMS-1 Software

>so you can't load RX frequencies greater than 470MHz into the FT-51R
by
>ADMS-1.
>If you want to do this, you can try EZ Clone.
>
>http://www.acsys.com



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Doug Cole)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need suggestion on 2 meter all mode mobile
Date: 6 Mar 96 02:41:45 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Kevin Muenzler wrote:

> Does anyone have any suggestions for a 2 meter all mode
> portable/mobile rig?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin, WB5RUE
> [e-mail]
> [e-mail]
>
>
well it seems to me that yaesu still makes a portable/mobile 2 meter all mode
check in the catalogs as I recall it has ability for battery or external
dc operation, don't know anything about performance but there you go......
      ___________________________________
      l                                 l
      l  Doug Cole         N7BFS        l
      l  amsat member    # 26182        l
      l  [e-mail]           l
      l  spokane,wa                     l
      l_________________________________l



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:16 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: New RS rig?
Date: 6 Mar 1996 18:45:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkmga$[e-mail]>
References: <4gucu6$[e-mail]> <4haf6e$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Raymond A. Brown) wrote:
>JRW ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: Anybody heard anything about the new HTX-242? I's been assuming it was a
>: dual-band mobile, but a RS store manager told me today that it's simply the

>: HTX-212 with a new model designation & catalog number! Anyone know the fact
s?
>
>  No, I don't. YET. :-)
>

Me, neither, but I've heard that RS will be releasing a "new, improved
212" that might be the 242 you're referring to.  This rumor comes to me
via some higher-ups in CAP, who are unhappy that the phrase "MARS/CAP
modifiable" is included in the advertisements for the 212, but the radio
is still worhtless for 90% of CAP usage after the mod.  Rumor has it that
more memories will be available and that the MARS/CAP mod will really
work this time.

73 de Will KB9JTT   [e-mail]
Milwaukee Emergency Services Squadron
Civil Air Patrol




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert J. Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Super Skyrider
Date: 2 Mar 96 10:59:53 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960302053717.8218B-100000@DGS>


  D. Ragsdale at calpoly.edy describes and asks about a Hallicrafters
"Super Skyrider" receiver.  Also asks why it tunes as high as 61 MHz.

  It sounds like a real collectors item.  The metal-dial Hallicrafters
were pre-WW II.  My 1938 ARRL Handbook carries an ad for such a
Hallicrafters receiver, though it tuned as high as "62 MC".  This was
their premium receiver at the time and must have cost a bundle, maybe $175
- equivalent to perhaps $1500 in today's money.  According to the ad, this
model had adjustable IF bandwidth which went from 7.5 to 25.5 kHz wide at
40 dB down (if I translate the ad's terminology correctly).  There was
also a [single-]crystal filter to reduce IF bandwidth to less than 1 kHz.

  The reason for tuning to 61 or 62 MHz was, of course, the 5-meter band
56 to 60 MHz.  The band was moved to 6-m (50-54 MHz) after WW II, and
54-60 became TV ch 2.  Five meters was as near as pre-War ham radio got to
present-day 2-m FM.  Many, many, many hams had simple 5-m AM equipment for
local contacts, even mobile.  5-m DX was just begining to be discovered at
the time, as equipment got better.  There was no ham FM (unless you count
Armstrong).

  An interesting find...
        73 de Bob  w3otc


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Cecil A. Moore~)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 17:04:18 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4h9v2i$[e-mail]>
References: <4g2j6u$[e-mail]> <4h40nl$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4h73q9$[e-mail]>

In article <4h73q9$[e-mail]>,
Glenn Sparks <[e-mail]> wrote:

>The problem isn't the tuner, the problem is the placement of the tuner,
>and the loss of the feedline.  Place the tuner at the antenna, so the
>coax is loaded and fed as 50 ohms and the loss of the tuner will be
>minimal.

That's how I feed my mobile antenna - with an SGC230 mounted at
the base of the antenna. It works great.

However, for fixed installations, I think you will find the
matched-line loss for reasonably priced coax is greater than
the total loss in the less expensive open-wire line even with
their sometimes "high" SWRs. The losses in the cheapest TV
twin-lead are approximately the same as RG-8.

Moving the tuner to the antenna may lessen or increase the
losses in the tuner. Varying the length of the transmission
line to reduce losses in the tuner is an option not available
directly at the antenna.

73, Cecil, KG7BK, OOTC  (not speaking for my employer)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:20 1996
From: Peter Shintani <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-706 Rx sensitivity is ?
Date: 1 Mar 1996 08:18:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4h6bt8$[e-mail]>

Hi
                I own an IC-706. I used it for a couple of months and find that the rx is ba
d
atleast on HF.(6m seems ok if the preamp is turned on, I have yet to use 2m)
Or atleast I think it is bad. For example, unless the preamp is turned on,
it doesnt' receive much on HF. Furthermore when the pre-amp is turned on, the
NF of the receiver seems to degrade considerably. When a low level signal
ie under 10 uV (50 term) is applied to the receiver, it seems to become noiser
instead of quietening down. I didn't think that this is normal. Does anyone ha
ve
any comments concerning on how to measure the NF  and sensitivity of an HF rx.

 (I used an HP8640B as the signal source, being analog it's suppose to be
pretty low noise, both am and phase wise)
        The service man commented that it was with in spec. I rebutted  that when com
pared to
other ICOM radio with the similar spec's, it doesn't hear as well. The service
 man then
commented that the margin between actual performance and the spec's is much le
ss
with the IC-706 since the circuitry has been simplified to fit in the smaller
box.

        I would appreciate any comments from people who have taken in their 706's
in for repair for bad rx and how the complaint was handled.

VE7-CQA from JA land





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 08:11:34 -0500
Message-ID: <4hhei6$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfvas$[e-mail]>

In article <4hfvas$[e-mail]>, Gary Davidson
<[e-mail]> writes:

>*BINGO!* A winner! The FIRST person to offer an estimate of power loss
>thru a tuner, rather than a bunch of irrelevant, financially impractical,

>and VASTLY intricate contortions to determine same...
>
>My hats off to you!
>
>

Yeah, it's just too bad it's a meaningless number that came out of thin
air!

The actual number can vary from a small fraction of a dB to a perhaps a
couple of dB, depending on the operating Q and the components unloaded Q,
and that all depends on how the operater sets the knobs and what the load
impedance is.

A more correct simple answer is "it's probably less than a couple dB".

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:22 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Richard Helton)
Subject: Re: IC-W31A/IC-Z1A CTSS Decode and Tone Squelch Standard?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1> <4hgncn$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 01:10:03 GMT

Roger W Sellers ([e-mail]) wrote:

: In article <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1>, [e-mail]₧ says...
: >
: >The HRO ad says that the IC-W31A and IC-Z1A both come standard withe 2.5
: >watts of power and CTSS decode standard, with the BP-180 battery. Does
: >this mean that they include the UT-94/UT-93 modules and also come withe
: >tone squelch, pocket beep, and tone scan? Is tone squelch controlled by a
: >CTSS tone or is like the DTMF paging feature of the FT-51R?
: >
: >Stephen

: No there is an optional tone board (the UT-93) I believe that is required fo
r
: that. Dealer was selling for 75-90 I thought.

  Although the manuel makes it seem that the UT-93 is optional, it is
  included in the us version.

: Roger
: KB9LBU

--
                                             [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (kimitsuka_glen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Identify Military Staight Key
Date: 6 Mar 1996 02:14:08 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hisdg$[e-mail]>



Hi, I found this key at a local swap and would like to know
  the background behind it.

  The key sits in an slanted openface enclosure about 4" X 4".
  On one side of the enclosure there is a 1/4" phonojack labeled
  "Phone" and the opposite side has one labeled, "Mic.".  There
  are two large four pin jacks with screw terminals labeled
  "M R R M".

  The key seems to be made of a very sturdy black reinforced
  phenolic material.  There are three contacts.  A common, normally
  open (like a normal key) and one that is normally closed.  The
  key handle more like a rounded drawer handle than flat like a
  disk.  It'a small, and very sturdy key, which is what I bought
  the entire assembly for but I may just keep the entire assembly
  intact.

Any information would be appreciated!

Tnx, Glen KM6WR



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:24 1996
From: "Gregory J. Buhyoff" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Answer for FT 900 - spontaneous shut down
Date: 4 Mar 1996 17:47:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4hfac3$[e-mail]>

Well, I just called Yaesu and here is what I found out.  There was a CPU probl
em on
some early versions of the FT 900 that would cause a spontaneous shut down.  I
t was
not indigenous to all radios even if they were part of the same manufacturing
lot
which contained some radios which suffered the problem.  You can check to see
if
your radio is affected.  Hold the A/B button and the V/M button while turning
the
power on.  First, the display will light up with LCD segments displayed.  Afte
r a
slight delay the display will show a batch of numbers.  The first three number
s (and
the largest ones on the display) indicate the version of the CPU.  If the numb
er is
151 you have the newest version of the CPU with the fix for the problem.  If t
he
number is less than 151 then your unit may be display this problem, at some ti
me and
in random fashion.  The reason I asked is that I bought a brand new FT 900 fro
m AES
last week and I noticed that, oddly, the serial number started with 4J06...  T
hus, I
knew it was manufactured in October of 1994!!  I knew that t this problem
existed in some of the earlier units.  My unit, however, has the new CPU unit
in it.
It displays a 151.  So if you have a serial number later than 4J06... you are
probably OK.  I don't know why AES has brand new units that were made in 1994
unless
Yaesu manufactured large batches early or if these were part of a very large s
tock.
 No matter.  The mystery is solved as to the determination of which FT 900's m
ay be
affected by the spontaneous shut-down problem.  I just wanted to share this
information in case any of you are in the process of buying a used FT 900 (or
a
brand new one, for that matter!).

73, Greg KN4FR



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paul Laughton)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 07:42:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgr8o$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>  <4hdlvj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] wrote:

>Paul,

>That's a very blatent claim you make. This patent went through with only
>one need for clarification from the PTO. Obviously know one else sought
>such a patent which is evidence by the PTO issuing me patent # 5457342.

>Those companies you mention have devices that are similar with respect to
>cooling only if you care to follow the patents mentioned on my abstract.
>However, NONE have developed the device I have NOR do they have a patent
>on such a device. As such, I am the sole owner to pursue development of
>this product or companies under infringement.

>Gaerhardt G. Herbst

Having too much time on my hands, I went and looked at your patent.
The first part of the patent describes the exact CCD cooling method
used for years by Santa Barbara Instruments (and others) for cooling
CCDs. Your novel claim seems to be an IC cooler that is retrofitted to
an existing, uncooled IC.

<Yawn>



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Len Revelle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola HF gear?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 06:25:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgn34$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hetck$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Motorola still manufactures HF gear, or did so recently. I have a
Triton 20 SSB transciever (xtal control) and two 1.5 KW amps (made for
Big M by Intermarine). I did have the base version of this Triton and
have seen a synthesized version that should still be in production.

[e-mail] (Michael T. Hodgson) wrote:

>In article <4hetck$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (D W
>Hemphill KC5NG) wrote:

>> Motorola did manufacture HF equipment, for the Military.
>> Examples are the old R-390 / R-392 series of receivers.

>They also manufactured later models called Micom stations/mobiles.

>Very similar to the mocom series radios.

>Mike

>--
>Mike - Raleigh, NC USA

>Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not in any way
>represent those of my employer.




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (Barry Hinkle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Icom W21AT Wide RX problem..
Date: 5 Mar 1996 16:16:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhpcj$[e-mail]>
References: <4hgi8o$[e-mail]>

In article <4hgi8o$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>I have done the keypad mod for extended RX, but it doesn't recieve much.
>I read on an FTP site that this it the way to do it. However, at a local
>repair shop, I was able to view a mod book for Icom radios. It cites the
>addition of D-23 (MA132WK) as the RF expansion mod. Has anyone tried
>this? Is it possible that Icom has stopped including this in the W21AT
>radios? I know the keypad mod works on the earlier models..... Perhaps
>they no longer include this diode. In the book, it said to do the keypad
>mod only AFTER inserting the diode/ So, maybe mine TUNES out of band,
but
>requires a diode to actually RECIEVE out of band.. Any experience with
this?
>
>
>Nate, KB9LSX
>
>Thanks alot!
>
Nate,
The diode is for extended tx. If you are trying to receive 800 Mhz forget
it. Its blocked in the cpu.

73
Barry KT4DQ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Doug Dunn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: QRO design with 4-1000
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 03:10:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgbjd$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Svein Henriksen <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Are there anyone out there with a good design for an amplifier using the
>4-1000. I have one but have little practical experience in
>amplifier desing work although I am an electronics engineer.

>Any help would be apreciated.

>73 de Svein
>E-mail : [e-mail]

Hi there Svein...I've built several RF Decks using the venerable
4-1000 and have had good success with them.  They CAN be
a brute to tame if you dont watch out for parasitic resonances,
but it's all workable.  So, if you're interested, I've got sort of a
"Standard" design I use and I'd be willing to copy it off and send
it to you.  The latest one is class B, GG service using B&W plate
tank unit and running about 4400v on the plate.  It's capable of
about 2200 watts out, but that's fearsome power for things like
antenna tuners and baluns.  E'mail me if you want.

73

Doug, K7YD





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:30 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Fuses for Knwd TL-922A amplifier
Message-ID: <313b26d0.9804979@198.190.226.3>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 17:43:53 GMT

My Kenwood TL-922A blew the 15 amp fuses. I corrected the problem and
the spare (original) set  of fuses were installed. Everything is now
working properly. I called Kenwood Parts Distributors (East Coast
Transistor Parts 800-637-0388) to find out what the fuses cost, since
I wanted some spares, and the gentleman told me that they were $7.50
each plus a shipping charge of $6.50 per order. That is $10.75 each
for fuses, delivered!! This person told me they were time delay fuses.
I started looking for replacements elsewhere. I came up with the
following:

Littlefuse:  FLM-15 time delay 250VAC.

The specs say to use these to protect control circuit transformers,
solenoids, and other circuits with high inrush currents.

They are 13/32"  X 1 1/2". At the local electrical parts outlet, they
sell for a little over $2 each. I purchased several fuses as spares.
These are not glass fuses but the cardboard sleeve type and the same
dimensions as the originals only alot cheaper.

Does anyone know of a list available to Kenwood owners as to
non-Kenwood  "replacement parts" such as panel lamps etc. Kenwoods'
replacement prices are just too high!

Thanks,

Dave


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Front end on DJ580 blown, ideas?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:42:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4hi21l$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Too bad Wally,

I had a detailed e-mail message I sent you but apparently, the Server Gods
think your address is bad.

Tony
WA6IGJ





[e-mail] (Walter R Francis) wrote:


>I forgot to disconnect/turn off my HT hooked up to a mobile antenna, and
>transmitted 50 watts out of another mobile antenna 1 1/2 feet away.  Now the
>receive is severely attenuated on 2M, works fine on transmitting both bands
>and receives fine on 440 (had it on single band mode, if that mattered)..

>Anyone have suggestions, besides sending it to Alinco?  I assume it's most
>likely a pretty complicated problem, transister or so chewed apart.

>Any and all help appreciated.  *sigh*





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (William R Davidson KA9SWW)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mod for FT-726R
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:19:25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4gu525$[e-mail]>

In article <4gu525$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Car
l Hodder) writes:
>From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
>Subject: Mod for FT-726R
>Date: 27 Feb 1996 05:32:53 GMT

>Wanted a frequency mod for the yaesu ft-726r all mode tribander.
>Anyone else have this radio and can give me any opinions on using
>it. I was told of a frequency mod for the 430 MHz band module
>to operate on 440 MHz. Looked at the WWW mod sites and could not find
>it. Anyone else hear of this mod? Also looking for the 50 MHz and
>440 MHz band modules. Will the band modules from a FT-736R work
>in the FT-726R?

>If you know of the mod to use the FT-726R on 440 MHz using
>the 430 MHz band module please post what site it's at or E-mail
>me the details.

>How would anyone compare the Ft-726R against the FT-736R besides
>it having CAT and 1200 MHz band option?

Here in Chicago i find the 726 with its narower front end  modules to be a
better bet than the 736. The 736 gets blown away with intermod and overload
while the older 726 works quite well.
If you are looking for a "wide band reciever" you will be better off with a
scanner the 726 does not go out of band well at all. the 430 to 440 conversion
should not be real difficult  but be prepared to change a bunch of parts in
the reciever . I am told the "sat." board is no longer available.  Good luck
Bill ka9sww


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RFI Proof Paint Available?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 4 Mar 96 12:54:03 EST
References: <4h8k9g$[e-mail]> <1996Mar4.032533.1@ssrl01>
Distribution: world

In article <1996Mar4.032533.1@ssrl01>, [e-mail] (Craig
 Haggart, Accelerator Ops) writes:
> Zack Schindler, N8FNR ([e-mail]) asked:
>
>    > Does anyone out there know of any company that produces a
>    > paint that reduces RFI?
>
> How about emulsified copper head gasket spray paint?  You get it
> from auto parts stores.
>
> I've never tried it for RFI shielding, but it may be a quick
> solution to your problem -- spray it on and ground it.  Easy to
> check with an ohmmeter to see whether or not the binder prevents
> adjacent particles from conducting.
>
> If you try it, let us know if it works!
> -Craig Haggart, KC6VHO
>  [e-mail]

Hi Craig, that's a great idea - and worth a try - but I'd sure want to try a
little on an non-critical part of the box. The carrier/binder may attack
the material that your'e shielding. Also, I'm not sure if this stuff actually
hardens. It may remain a sticky mess for quite a while.

73,
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Manny Tau, Psy.D.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:07:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4hht71$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]>

I believe that Comet makes an aftermarket antenna for the 508a
utilizing this SMA connector.  It's a little bigger than the stock,
and I saw it at HRO.

Manny

[e-mail] (andy) wrote:

>Has anyone found one of those little mini screw-on connectors/adapters
>for the C508A antenna jack? Might be nice to try an external antenna
>sometime, but I've never seen a connector quite like this one.

>BTW...are you as impressed with this unit as I am? The aircraft receive
>is the best I've ever heard; it even beats the reception on Standard's
>own C288A. Batteries seem to last forever, and it's just not that hard to
>get into a repeater with 280 mw. Would have just preferred a normal BNC
>antenna connector, though...

>-andy, k4adl



  ************************************
   Manny Tau WH6OQ
   [e-mail]
   CI$: 73617,1731
  ************************************



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 6 Mar 1996 15:53:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4hku01$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jari Jokiniemi)
writes:

>How can SB-220 produce so little output as 600 W in CW? I have a
>SB-200 which seems to produce just about the same, around 500-600 W
>out in CW depending on the band in question. SB-200 has two 572B's and
>SB-220 has two 3-500Z's, so the SB-220 should definetely do better
>than 600 W in CW.
>--
>Jari Jokiniemi, jar

Hi Jari,

The answer is in the SB-220 manual and Heathkit's specifications. The
specified operating **plate input** power of the SB-220 is 1 kw dc on CW.
That was the maximum power allowed at the time the SB-220 was designed, so
the engineers never planned for more power.

There is no specified RF output power, but the nominal anode efficiency of
that amplifier ranges from 50 to 65 %. The SB-220, operated at it's full
rating, produces a CW output of 500 to 650 watts.

If the amplifier is abused, and operated beyond design values, it will
produce more output power. But the cooling system, power supply, and tank
components were all designed with 1 kw dc plate input power maximum as a
goal.

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:37 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
From: [e-mail] (James Casey)
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 21:57:29 GMT

Some of the older and low-end rigs have no volume control for the cw
monitor. I have found it helpful to have volume controls on each ear
piece of the headphones to compensate for this. Set the side-tone for
comfortable volume through the speaker then plug in your headphones, set
their controls for 3/4 volume and adjust the rigs and headphones volume
until the sidetone is at a comfortable level.



Steve Silverwood ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I have been using a pair of Archer (Radio Shack) lightweight mono
: headphones for SWL and ham work, but they are getting a little worn.  I
: would like to get a better set of headphones -- mono, general purpose for
: both SWL and ham use -- but would like to find out what others are using
: and get their recommendations.  Any comments, feedback etc. will be greatly
: appreciated.  Thanks in advance.


: -- //Steve//

: Computer Associates    CompuServe: 76703,3035
: Fax: [phone]      Internet: [e-mail]
: Phone: [phone]    America Online: KB6OJS
: Homepage: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/KB6OJS
: Personal homepage: http://www.earthlink.net/~kb6ojs


--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gary Hosler - KN0Z)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Fuses for Knwd TL-922A amplifier
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 15:33:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkbva$[e-mail]>
References: <313b26d0.9804979@198.190.226.3>

[e-mail] wrote:

>My Kenwood TL-922A blew the 15 amp fuses. I corrected the problem and
>the spare (original) set  of fuses were installed. Everything is now
>working properly. I called Kenwood Parts Distributors (East Coast
>Transistor Parts 800-637-0388) to find out what the fuses cost, since
>I wanted some spares, and the gentleman told me that they were $7.50
>each plus a shipping charge of $6.50 per order. That is $10.75 each
>for fuses, delivered!! This person told me they were time delay fuses.
>I started looking for replacements elsewhere. I came up with the
>following:

---------SNIP--------
>Thanks,

>Dave


I had a similiar problem Dave.  The difference is that I called East
Coast Transistor Parts and told them that I had spent the weekend
looking for replacements with no luck.  I gave them my CC number and
told them to send me 5 PAIRS's!  Stupid me,...didn't ask the price!
After all, they are just fuses,...right?  Darn near went into cardiac
arrest when I got the bill.  I called them back to verify the price,
just couldn't believe the goudge job.  If anyone else out there is in
need of a spare set of fuses I've got a few to sell.  How bout $13 a
PAIR shipped CONUS!

                        73's de KN0Z  Gary in Wyoming, MN

Opinions expressed herein are my own and may not represent those of 3M.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bryan Cowan)
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Date: 2 Mar 1996 08:51:01 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>

In article <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(D. Ragsdale) wrote:

-> I've had this old Hallicrafters receiver for about 20 years; I've used
-> it a lot for shortwave listening - it's still a great receiver - I'm
-> just wondering when it was made and if it has any collector value or if
-> it's just a neat old radio.  Description:
->
-> Very large, rack mount, facepiece is 9 inches high by 19 inches wide.
->
-> No cabinet, don't know if it ever had one.
->
-> No model number I can find, but says "Super Skyrider" on the tuning
-> dial.  The tuning dial is a 5 inch diameter metal (aluminum?) disk
-> sitting out in front of the facepiece, with freqs. etched in it -
->
-> Radio tunes from 550 KHz to 61 MHz in 6 bands (61 MHZ?  why?)
->
-> Has standard meter and controls, including crystal phasing, pitch
-> control, bfo, etc.
->
-> Knobs appear to be black bakelite.
->
-> Any info. would be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

One of my books lists the *Super Skyrider* as being the model SX-9, made
in 1936. Hallicrafters ham gear usually came in metal cabinets, somewhere
along the line yours has had its cabinet removed for whatever reason. This
was intended to be a ham communications reciever, so it goes up to
unusually high frequencies. As for collector value, not much in the way of
monetary value. But Hallicrafters radios were very well made and are still
great for DXing-my first shortwave reciever was a 1946 S-40 given to me
when I was a kid by an old ham who didn't need it anymore, and I still use
it.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Terry LaBrier)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: for sale 220  fm icom mobile
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 14:53:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4h7562$[e-mail]>
References: <4h444p$[e-mail]>

PHIL DIAZ <[e-mail]> wrote:

>to anyone interested in a 220 fm mobile,
>
>i have an icom ic38a in prestine condition, box and owners manual. have
>no need for it in my area. looking to maybe trade or sell it. if anyone
>has a uhf repeater setup i'd be real interested in doing some trading.
>i'm presently in the early plans of setting up a uhf repeater in my home
>for the enjoyment of doing it. i have already got the cavities but i
>still need the controller and the rest of the hardware. if it works out
>well, it will later be moved to a nearby mountain site that a friend of
>mine owns. but that will be in the future. uhf repeaters are scarce in
>these parts. and my dream is to have an open repeater for everyone to
>use.
>so if anyone has such a unit and doesn't know what to do with it, please
>reply.
>thanks a lot for taking the time to read this.
>                       phil   kc7afb
>                       prescott valley, az

Hi Phil:
I don't have a repeater, but may be interested in buying the 220.
Call me at 1-800-727-3999 and we can talk.  This is my work number.  I
work from 12 noon until 9:00 PM (CST).  Ask for Terry LaBrier.  If I'm
away or on the telephone, leave your name and number on my voice mail
and I'll call you back.
73,
Terry

***************************
* Terry LaBrier, N0AHY    *
* [e-mail] *
***************************



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Mallick)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Date: 4 Mar 1996 21:47:29 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hfodh$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hf4cf$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

In article <4hf4cf$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jay Kesterson K0GU)
writes:
|> On a somewhat related subject. My 706 has rated output on HF and VHF
|> in the CW mode. However on SSB it only puts out about 30/40 watts on
|> HF and ~4 watts on 2m. If I whistle in the mike I get near CW output
|> but speech, no matter what the volume, produces the lower output.
|> The mike seems OK, turning the mike gain up doesn't make much difference
|> after level 2 or 3 and the processor only helps a little. ALC levels
|> seem normal and the 706 output meter indicates power out. I have tried
|> it on two good power supplies. Don't think it is pilot error. Any ideas
|> out there? ICOM tech support says send it back.
|>
|> Does the 706 have a internal SSB power adjustment like some radios (my
|> old TS-930 had one)? How much does your unit put out on SSB?
|>
|> 73, Jay  K0GU                  [e-mail]

--
If you whistle into the mike and get CW output levels, then it is probably
OK.  Remember that speech is a complex waveform, so its average power level
is quite a bit lower than single tone signals (like your whistle) or CW.

If you get to near-CW power level with speech signals, then you are either
splattering pretty badly or just heavily compressed.

BTW, my old Icom 745 behaves the same way.
73, John WA1HNL

.... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..
John A. Mallick WA1HNL                    E-mail: [e-mail]
GE Corporate Research and Development     Phone: [phone] (W)
Schenectady, NY 12301                     FAX:   [phone] (W)
.... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..     .... ..

"Work like hell.  Tell everyone everything you know.  Close a deal
 with a handshake.  And have fun." --- "Doc" Edgerton


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (COUGER GORDON)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info req'd on TEN TEC 1208 6M TRANSVERTER
Date: 4 Mar 1996 14:38:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4hev8p$[e-mail]>
References: <4h8g8t$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: Gordon Couger <[e-mail]>

In article <4h8g8t$[e-mail]>,
Adam Maurer VK3ALM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Just new to Oz is the Ten Tec 1208 6M transverter kit.
>
>Has anyone built one of these kits up?

My son built one for his first project. After fixing the cold solder joints
it worked great. The alignment with at VOM was as good as a tech could do
with all the signal generators etc.

>How do they perform.
They preform very well. The reciver could stand some more preamp. But it is
plenty for or 10 watts out. I never had any problem hearing any one that
came back to me. If I was going to add a power amplifier I would also add
a preamp.

>Are they broad enough to cover the full 4MHz?
Not with out retuning. They are designed for the SSB end of the band.

>Is the standard I.F. 14MHz?
yes.

>PWR O/P is quoted as 8W.  Whats the PA consist of?
I don't remember

>Is the kit reasonable quality or crap?
It is very good quality.

Gordon AB5DG
   Gordon Couger
   Biosystems & Agricultural Engineering. 114 AG Hall Stillwater, OK 74075
   [e-mail] 405 744 8392 day 625-2855 evenings



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 16:28:15 GMT

In article <4hfdc0$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (andy) writes:
>Has anyone found one of those little mini screw-on connectors/adapters
>for the C508A antenna jack? Might be nice to try an external antenna
>sometime, but I've never seen a connector quite like this one.

You can get a SMA->BNC adapter from Radio Shack. However, there is a
potential problem. These adapters don't have the rubber "shoulder" built
into the C508A antenna that mates down against the case. This "shoulder"
takes a good deal of the flex load off the connector. So if you use
an adapter and a regular BNC antenna, you could break the SMA in the
radio if you flex it hard.

>BTW...are you as impressed with this unit as I am? The aircraft receive
>is the best I've ever heard; it even beats the reception on Standard's
>own C288A. Batteries seem to last forever, and it's just not that hard to
>get into a repeater with 280 mw. Would have just preferred a normal BNC
>antenna connector, though...

Yes, its a marvel. Comet makes a "gain" duck for this radio. It does
have the "shoulder" so it strain relieves the connector. It works much
better than the factory duck, especially for out of band receive. It
is 15 inches long, however, which looks real funny on the tiny radio.

The SMA is really a better connector than a BNC, and with the size of
this radio, it is the practical choice for an antenna connector. Many
cellphones use this connector, so they're really pretty common. You
*will* wear it out quickly if you connect and disconnect antennas a
lot. The female center pin will spread and become intermittant. Of
course you can have the same problem with BNC connectors.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:46 1996
From: Gene Shablygin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-775DSP vs. FT-1000MP?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 21:30:54 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>


In article <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]> writes:
> Path:
alterdial.uu.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!news.mr.net!
n
ews.protocom.com!usenet
> From: [e-mail]
> With some of the recent radios in DSP technology, the time is right for
> me to buy a new HF rig that also includes dual receive.  Both the Icom
> IC-775DSP and Yaesu FT-1000MP appear to have the features I like, but I
> don't have good information on each.  For example, I understand the Icom
> has had a problem with tranmitting on both frequencies when operating
> "split", and I don't know if they've got this fixed... also, the recent
> QST review was fairly mediocre support for this unit, in my view.  On
> the other hand, I don't know much about the FT-1000MP, how it differs
> from the FT-1000D and whether anyone has experience to offer regarding
> the pros and cons of either the Icom or Yaesu selections.  Any help out
> there?
>

It looks like 1000MP is superior to 775DSP in many aspects. It is quiter,
more user-friendly, and... MUCH cheaper (almost 1000 bucks less). The
biggest drawback of 1000MP is its "low" power (100 W), which is not enough
for driving 2x3-500Z amplifier for full output. The only other advantage
of 775DSP I found is much better manual notch filter.

After long thoughts, I bought 1000MP -- and do not regret. Now I am waiting,
until Fox-Tango will design IF filters for it...

Still, none of new digital radios can outperform old good Drake R4C with
proper alignment and good filters! But to have all in one box, I think
that today 1000MP is the best ham transceiver money can buy.

73

Gene AB5GY / RA3AA



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (John LeMoine)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex Inc-still around?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 16:53:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4h9ugu$[e-mail]>
References: <4fm3db$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4h755f$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] () wrote:

>Barry Kutner ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: > >I have been referred to a company called Periphex Inc of Oxford, Connect
icut
>: > >as a supplier of very good ni-cad battery packs for handhelds. Unfortuna
tely: > >the address and fax number I was given appear to be out of date, or t
he
>: > >company
>: > >has gone bust.
>: > >Thank you,
>: > >Al Bolton
>: > >OK8VSQ/OM/G4VSQ
>: > >Caversham, UK
>: >
>:
>: I once had some batteries from Periphex that wouldn't hold their charge.
>: They refused to honor the warranty and exchange them. Let the buyer
>: beware!

>Myself and 3 friends all ordered batteries from Periphex for IC-W2A Icom
>handhelds. All 3 cases broke around the mount within 2 months. Periphex
>refused to honor their "1 year warranty" and all 3 had to be tossed.

>DO NOT BUY FROM PERIPHEX! You will regret it!
>-----
Wow! I bought the same battery for the same radio and had the same
thing happen within a month or two!!!! I'm glad I read this post as I
was about to order another battery from those rip-offs!!! They told me
mine was the only case they had heard of with this problem and I must
have banged the case causing the damage, I knew that wasn't the case.
        I was sliding the battery off the radio and the track on the battery
just fell off, I assumed it was a defect in the housing case and now I
know I was right. I'll look eleswhere for now on for replacement
batteries. Periphex is off my recommended list.

                                                John/KC1TV





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Doug McFadden)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Looking for attenuator
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:52:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4hesnf$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] wrote:


>Greetings,
>I am looking for an active attenuator to be used on two
>meters. When I am foxhunting, I get swamped whenever I
>get close to the fox. I am using a KAY unit, and that
>works ok until I get close, then I get swamped. I have
>been told that I need the active attenuator so that I can
>hook it up to the beam and then adjust it so I can get
>closer before I get out with the ground gear. I have tried
>using a talkie with no duck, but not much luck.

>I am looking for something already made up as I have had
>no luck with kits.

>Any help would be appreciated.

>Replies to:

>[e-mail] or [e-mail]

>Thanks

>73

>Rich - KA9MAB

Have you tried tuning slightly off frequency.  One of the old-timers
here uses that trick.



Doug
========================================================================
Live from Eugene Oregon:   Doug McFadden,   KC7IMR,   [e-mail]
========================================================================
Stand behind everything you sell, except the manure spreader, of course.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Fellhauer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What ever happened to...RDF
Date: 1 Mar 1996 09:24:02 -0700
Message-ID: <4h78b2$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Roger N. Hoffeditz) wrote:

>Marine RDF's seem to have gone by the window of time. Everytime I go to
>a boat show, I always ask for them. The answer seems to be "If you had
>one today, you could sell it for a lot of money". 'Seems all the old
>ones were scarfed up by commercial fisherman. I understand someone
>produces one for a very large price, but not for me.
>I was thinking that someone could design a signal analyser independent
>of the radio, and display the info on an LCD screen; sell a couple
>hundred and make out really good!

I saw one just a few months ago (in working condition) at a Ham Fest.

Unfortunately, the owner wanted $60, and I was unwilling to part with
that type of $$ for an amusing piece of antiquated technology.  Also
it could RDF on FM, up to, BUT NOT INCLUDING the 2 meter HAM band.
If it had, I probably woulda bought it.  But of course, if it did RDF
on two meters it would have:

a) already been sold

b) priced much higher

c) not been for sale

d) all of the above

The cost of Doppler RDF units is dropping, though.  I believe a
company called Agrelo Engineering is starting production of a DSP
doppler system for hams, with a base cost in the $250 to $300 range.
They are on the WEB, but their URL escapes me at this moment.

73,

Mark Fellhauer - KC7BXS
[e-mail]
ThunderBird ARC Packet Coordinator





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (jeff wright)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mods/Comments for Yaesu FT-51R
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 07:12:09 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2802962016480001@192.0.2.1>

Stephen:

I was curious, so I called both Yaesu tech support and RT Systems (the
makers of the programming software).

Yaesu said it wasn't a "recommended mod", but that the software freq
change using the programmer shouldn't hurt the radio.

When I called RT Systems, the gentleman I spoke with said the radio was
only capable of receiving from 100-180 and 375-525 MHZ.  Anything out of
those freqs would not be heard at all...

Does this help you any?

The actual software mod to the RT System program:

Go to win.ini and look for a section that contains ALLOWANYFREQUENCY = 0.
Change the 0 to a 1.  RESTART WINDOWS.  You can then program in just about
any frequency FROM YOUR PC...THIS DOESN'T CHANGE THE KEYPAD ENTRY, but
only freqs in the range above will be heard.

Regards,

jeff wright
kc5nez


In article <lui-2802962016480001@192.0.2.1>, [e-mail] (Stephen Lui) wrot
e:

> Does anyone who owns a FT-51R have any comments on the unit or the
> programming software? Does the unit truly only receive to 470MHz? The
> magic number for me is 471.1375MHz, the frequency of our local police,
> which I like to monitor.
>
> Does anyone know of any mods for the FT-51R (preferably keyboard) to
> extend the RX range? The unit is so small that I would think any hardware
> mods would be difficult.
>
> Stephen
> (Iching to buy an HT, as soon as I can decide which one!)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Manny Tau, Psy.D.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:04:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4hht13$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hb2di$[e-mail]>

FYI,
I've mod'ed the 51 for expanded tx/rx, and found that even when the
WIN.INI  FT51 section has "allowany frequency" set to 0, the software
still allows me to enter all the tx and rx freqs that are out of band.
It's nice that the software can recognize a mod'ed HT and will allow
the out of band freqs to be entered and used.

Manny

Rod Thompson <[e-mail]> wrote:

>tomching <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>You can not enter RX frequency greater than 470 MHz on ADMS-1 Software
>>so you can't load RX frequencies greater than 470MHz into the FT-51R by
>>ADMS-1.

>The ADMS-1 software in default configuration is like that of the default FT-5
1.  You
>can only enter in frequencies that the radio (based on hardware jumpers) is d
esigned
>to receive.  However, by opening the file WIN.INI (useing NOTEPAD) and under
>the FT 51 Programmer section change the the ALLOWANYFREQUENCY from 0 to 1 you
 can
>enter ANY frequency. However the US version of the radio will only receive fr
om 100
>to 180 MHz and 375 to 525MHz (approximately).

>The software mod is only is the US version and WILL NOT be available is the J
APAN
>version (which is due out shortly).


>>If you want to do this, you can try EZ Clone.
>>
>>http://www.acsys.com




  ************************************
   Manny Tau WH6OQ
   [e-mail]
   CI$: 73617,1731
  ************************************



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 16:57:49 GMT

In article <4hicb4$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>I have been using a pair of Archer (Radio Shack) lightweight mono
>headphones for SWL and ham work, but they are getting a little worn.  I
>would like to get a better set of headphones -- mono, general purpose for
>both SWL and ham use -- but would like to find out what others are using
>and get their recommendations.  Any comments, feedback etc. will be greatly

I suspect several people will consider this heresy, but I recomend using
the best high fidelity headphones you can find, and a stereo-mono adapter
if your radio needs it (some radios today will already work properly
with stereo headphones). I think the best lightweight headphone is the
Koss PortaPro.

The reason some may consider this heresy is that this type of headphone
has a very wide bandwidth, and they will urge you to get headphones with
restricted bandwidth to reduce the high frequency noise you will hear.
This is, IMHO, a mistake. You should do any necessary filtering electronically
before the signal is fed to the transducers. The reason for this is that
restricted bandwidth electromagnetic transducers have high THD (5% to 10%
is not uncommon), and excessive phase distortion, and that leads to listener
fatigue. It is far better to get the necessary filtering done electronically
where THD can easily be held to a fraction of 1%, and then feed that filtered
signal to a transducer which will have low THD in the restricted bandpass.
(This is similar to a crystal filter, which has large non-linearity near
its passband edges, but can be quite linear in the center of its range.)

The Koss PortaPro is also quite sensitive, so you can run reduced receiver
volume. This is also good, because typical receivers start to have large
THD numbers when driven toward higher signal levels. So running at reduced
volume settings can also reduce listener fatigue.

If your receiver's audio stage generates excessive hiss and hum, its
design is broken, and needs to be fixed, not just masked by limited
response headphones.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: 6 Mar 1996 14:08:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4hk68o$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hj9vc$[e-mail]>

[e-mail](Kevin Karamanos ) writes:
>WARNING......
>If you use EZ Clone or another external software other than the
>recommended ADMS-1 software, you may find that your warranty is void on
>your FT-51R.
>Why take the risk?????
>tomching <[e-mail]> writes:
>>ADMS-1.
>>If you want to do this, you can try EZ Clone.
>>http://www.acsys.com

I don't get it. Yaesu DID NOT develop ADMS-1, they bought it from a small
company that developed it and had been selling it themselves for a
while. So are all the radios that were programmed using ADMS-1 before
Yaesu bought the software tainted in some manner? And what of all those
fancy HF radios on the market that can be computer controlled by various
makers software packages? Are all those radios under suspicion?

Amateur radios are not the same as other forms of consumer electronics. There
are no labels declaring "No User Serviceable Parts Inside". Amateurs are
SUPPOSED to be fiddling about with their toys, and the manufacturers expect
it. Were Yaesu to go about invalidating warranties every time an amateur
programmed a radio, they'd pretty quickly be out of business.

Why buy EZ-Clone over ADMS-1? It's quite simple for me. ADMS-1 is a Windows
application, requiring the large $$$ platform of a Windows based machine. I
need to reprogram my FT-51R on the go and in remote locales from a cheap old
8088 based laptop with onle two 720K floppy drives. My understanding is that
EZ-Clone will readily run off of one 720K floppy. What I'm doing is using the
toy for SAR operations, which can occur in many different regions. Should I
buy a laptop that will support Windows so that I can run ADMS-1? Now that
would be absurdedly expensive!

If Yaesu wanted to support this part of the market they've had plenty of time
to do so. Both Yaesu and the original maker (I've lost the prior company's
info) heard from me on this. I've ordered EZ-Clone as a Beta Tester, it
should come in this week.

That is all.

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:58 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,alt.radio.swap
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Can I boost the output power of a KW TM-741A?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4h8jrj$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 16:39:44 GMT

In article <4h8jrj$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>I have a modified (extended band range) Kenwood TM-741A.  I have the 28MHz,
>144MHz, & 440MHz band units installed. The output power is 50W for the 28 & 1
44,
>and 35W for the 440.   I would like to boost the output power to around 100W
for
>each... (although I could live with less on the 440.).  Please ignore my lack
 of
>knowledge in this area.  Also, please post replies here as I am going to chan
ge
>my ISP soon.   tia.


Well, of course, you need 3 external amplifiers. You'll have to build
the 10 meter one since there aren't any legally available for commercial
sale. For 2 meters and 70 cm you can buy commercial 100 watt amps. You
can get one that goes from 30 watts to 100 watts, though amps that go
from 10 watts to 100 watts are much more common, but I haven't seen
any that go from 50 watts to 100 watts (since most people don't consider
a 3 db power boost worthwhile). So you'll need to make sure you always
run your radio on its low power setting when driving the amps to avoid
overdriving and damaging the amps.

Most of the amps available in the 100 watt class are $250-$350 each,
so you may have to spend  $900 to get a 3 db boost in signal strength
on all three bands. Frankly, I can't imagine it being worthwhile. 3 db
of gain is so easy to get with a suitable mobile antenna, and so much
cheaper, that it really doesn't make any sense to do this.

The only reason it might make sense is that the Kenwood can overheat
when operated at 50 watts, and it might make sense to run it more
conservatively and drive the amps to make the power. But it seems to
me a better course would be to dump the Kenmore and get a real radio
that can stand operating at its rated power for extended periods instead.

Don't even *think* about hotrodding the Kenwood, it *will* go into
terminal meltdown because it is inadequately thermally designed to
handle even its "rated" power. If you doubt this, just look at the
heatsink on a commercial 100 watt amp, then look at the heatsink
on your Kenwood. It is to laugh.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:14:59 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (SARUMAN)
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 01:15:17 GMT

>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC

>J>And tell the rest of us in NYC, who are dying for an alternative.

>The problem with NYC is this:  THERE IS NO PARKING AVAILABLE!  Why, oh
>why would anyone want to put a Ham Radio store where there is no
>parking???

>On top of that, the rents that merchants pay is ASTRONOMICAL in NY, so
>why not put the store in a low rent area?
>---
>   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

> * Origin: CyberNet BBS   Lyndhurst, NJ (1:2604/151)


>              .....oooooOOOOOo         http://www.intac.com/~cono

>      __,-----. ---+_________#_     The Roy Hobbs BBS [e-mail]

>     |________| |__|___________}          Node 1: 201-641-7307

>      ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\         Node 2: 201-641-3126


 Howdy from another New Yorker. I am fairly clueless tho, just getting into th
e
hobby.


<tsb>
                               Midgard Graphics
           3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer
                          Email: [e-mail]

--
          Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime

--

<tsb>

                     A man of many hobby's master of none.




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex Inc-still ar
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 6 Mar 96 21:02:44 EST
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world

In article <[e-mail]>, Alan Raskind <[e-mail]> writes
:
[snip]
> I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
> other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
> with W&W Associates.
>
> How are their batteries?
> Case quality and fit?
> Life expectancy?
> Nicad memory?
> What about their Master Charger I that uses "delta negative voltage
> detection" with the custom charging "cups"?
> Does it work OK?
> Does this charging method help improve the life of the battery?
> What about the quality of the cups and chargers themselves?
> Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC

Alan,
I have a couple of packs from W&W. I bought them for my Yaesu FT470. I bought
the 7.2V 600mah and 12V 600mah packs. I also bought the Mastercharger II
specifically to charge the 12V pack. They both seem to outlast the factory
(7.2V 600mah) pack. I have (mis) treated all of them about the same,
occasionally leaving them fully discharge, and perhaps leaving them in a hot
car now and then. I also occasionally forget and leave them charge - maybe
even for a few days.

I always run a nicad pack at least to the knee, where the voltage starts to
drop, before recharging. I have not noticed any evidence of memory.

I usually use the original Yaesu NC28b 60ma charger to charge both of the 7.2V
packs, and use the 3hr "mastercharger II" to charge the 12V pack. I get long
life out of the 12V pack, even when I use it to push the radio to 5W to reach
our UHF repeater from inside the house.

The fit seems ok in this application, although the finish is a little differen
t
than the factory. Slightly "glossy" or "waxy" comes to mind.

I have also bought loose C cells from W&W for a portable multimode. Have never
had any problems there either.

Overall I'm pretty happy with W&W and will go back when I need to.
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Key jack placement...
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 16:14:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4hcgj8$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

>...
>No, it is just that in a home setting, the key is connected all the time
>and thus does not need to be in the front.  The mic and headphones are
>always being connected and disconnected and therefore need to be in the
>front.

>Nice try on justifying the demise of the CW requirement but...

>                              NO DICE!

>                              CW STAYS!

'Oh, Plezzze!

CW sucks, Elmer.   Even the US Coast Guard no longer requires it!  And for
good reason...  CW is a dead, useless, outdated, archaic mode of
communications.  Face it, CW is dead ~ finished.  I'd sooner use a jungle
drum.

Can you imagine how many  talented persons have been locked out of our ham
radio fraternity because they couldn't learn the code?  Otherwise, these
are very gifted engineers, technicians, programmers, non~technicals,  just
plain folks from across the whole US;  citizens all.  All denied the ham
radio privilege because they could not learn/retain the stupid code!  Even
the feds finally woke-up to that.  ARRL did too, think of all the
memberships they were missing out on?

As a ham for twenty five years plus, I've used CW only once, really,  to
upgrade to General because I was interested in 10 meters.  A important
point is that I have never USED CW on ten or any other band with exception
of 1 year as a Novice in high school!  I hated code then, I hate it now.
The guys on two meters tested me over the air a few months back and I
passed... That and a cup of coffee, I'd take the coffee.

If there must be a requirement for code, it should be for those who WISH to
qualify for the code spectrum(s) set aside within our ham bands now.  So
how about a ham license with code endorsement?  What's wrong with that?
Those purest cuckoo's who live for the  dah-de-dah's  can pound till the
cows come home!

We left our caves and spark-gaps behind, now it's time to burry CW.
Hurumph!

Tony Cardenas
WA6IGJ,  WV6ZJE (1963~Novice)



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Wes Stewart)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.funds,misc.invest.canada
Subject: Re: Announsing: Technology Patent Available For Purchase
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 20:50:45 LOCAL
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>   <4hdlvj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hfqtn$[e-mail]>

In article <4hfqtn$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Fell
ows) writes:

>In article <[e-mail]>,
>[e-mail] writes:
>|> Paul,
>|>
>|> That's a very blatent claim you make. This patent went through with only
>|> one need for clarification from the PTO. Obviously know one else sought
>|> such a patent which is evidence by the PTO issuing me patent # 5457342.
>|>
>|> Those companies you mention have devices that are similar with respect to
>|> cooling only if you care to follow the patents mentioned on my abstract.
>|> However, NONE have developed the device I have NOR do they have a patent
>|> on such a device. As such, I am the sole owner to pursue development of
>|> this product or companies under infringement.
>|>
>|> Gaerhardt G. Herbst
>|>


>What I am wondering is what this has anything to do with amateur radio antenn
as,
>homebrew, space, etc.?  The point is that this, and the preceding posts were
>made to the amateur radio news groups.

>Cooling of microprocessors, and your grandstanding of being awarded a patent
are
>of no interest to me or in any way pertinent to my interest in amateur radio.

>And that is why the newsgroup(s) have those titles.

>If you are looking for invetors, get a clue and do it somewhere else.

>If you are simply so proud of yourself for being awarded a patent for what
>appears to be anothers work, then HIP HIP HOORAY for you!  Now grow up and go
>away.

>Jim



Amen, Jim.  If this thing works like this guy spells, he's got a tough sell.

"Announsing", "blatent" and "know one else" indeed. I don't know what his
device is,  because searching for the number didn't work for me. Sounds like a

Peltier device, but I guess it could be cold fusion.

73, Wes -- N7WS



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Stan Huntting)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 15:27:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhmhs$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfvas$[e-mail]> <4hhei6$[e-mail]>

In article <4hhei6$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...

>The actual number can vary from a small fraction of a dB to a perhaps a
>couple of dB, depending on the operating Q and the components unloaded Q,
>and that all depends on how the operater sets the knobs and what the load
>impedance is.

Even Tom's reasoned response is conservative when he suggests that the correct

figure could reach "a couple of dB". Let me relate a non-quantitative
experience that illustrates how serious this loss can be.

I was using a commercial tuner from a large company whose last initial is
reputed to stand for "Junk". The tuner was rated to handle "3 KW", and has the

attractive feature of only TWO tuning controls. I was operating rtty into a
Hygain rotatable dipole at 80' above ground, on a frequency that was about 100

kHz below resonance The antenna is very narrow due to its linear loading so I
was using the tuner. Less than two minutes into a transmission there was a arc

from the tuner and I was off the air. Examination showed that the polymer form

that supports the roller inductor had deformed from heat and the roller
inductor now looked like the sway back of an old nag. Needless to say, it no
longer rolled.

This is a long way from approximating a laboratory calorimeter, but the fact
remains that what destroyed that tuner was heat, and that heat came from losse
s
in the tuner circuit. Now the shocker: at the time, I was operating barefoot a
t
150 watts! To melt that form during a two minute operation at 150 watts
suggests that the wonderful two-control design had yielded an operating point
at which the circulating currents were outrageous! The circuit is nothing more

than the common series-capacitance/shunt-inductance Tee-match with the additio
n
of capacitors that are ganged differentially. Exactly the same operating point

could be achieved with any other three control, Tee-match tuner.

An article published in QST a while back provides some real insite into just
how high the losses in antenna tuners can reach. It should be required reading

for those interested in this thread. 73,

Stan
--
Stan Huntting,    KF0IA
email:            [e-mail]
fax:              303 444 2314
KaWin home page:  http://www.mutadv.com/kawin/
KaWin FTP site:   ftp://ftp.csn.net/kawin
postal address:   4655 Pleasant Ridge Rd.,
                  Boulder, CO 80301-1731, USA



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:07 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 16:15:49 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> Scott Gray <[e-mail].
com> writes:
>Have a nice new IC-706. Love it, but the Mic Gain is poor at best.
>Suggested fixes by ICOM (changing R236 to 100K) increases the mic gain
>ONLY... SSB /ALC levels remain unaffected and low for my preferences.
>The ICOM mod gives you a TON of increased audio (you can hear the little
>fan blowing in the background with the mic gain set at about 4-5), but
>you get mic gain ONLY. I mean independent of output power on SSB. Yeah,
>on my local receiver (R8) and on a IFR 1200 service monitor the result is
>loud. But the power level (SSB) acts as if I set the mic gain way down to
>a 1. ALC action doesn't exist until I crank it up to 7 to 8 level. By
>that time the mic is sooo hot that it picks up a flea's fart! But still
>weak on SSB output power (FM Fine). Using a Heil HC-5 or a Shure 444
>(with a dc block cap of course) produces unuseable audio for SSB work.
>ICOM can you help? Anybody else experience this?
>HELP.

Sounds like you have more than adequate mike gain. Lets review a few things.

The voice waveform is complex, and has a peak to average ratio of about
8. This means that with a 100 watt PA, to remain linear the radio must
output an average power of only 12.5 watts while showing a peak power of
100 watts. This is *correct* operation for a linearly operating radio.

The purpose of ALC is to *keep* the radio operating linearly in the face
of an overdriven input. It does this by sensing the voice *peak*, and
lowering gain until that peak is at 100 watts (in this case). To maintain
linearity, the ALC needs to have a fast attack and slow release, so if
the ALC operates properly, average SSB power out will be maintained at
12.5 watts for typical speech regardless of drive level (after some
threshold value is passed).

To get more than 12.5 watts output, the radio must become *non-linear*,
IE it must reduce the peak to average ratio of the speech waveform. The
circuit that does that is called a *compressor*. The IC-706 has one.
If you crank up compression, you can get more than 12.5 watts average
power out of the radio, but of course the speech waveform is now distorted
from its true shape.

You may be used to a radio with an ALC circuit that doesn't have a
slow release time, and thus acts as a crude compressor. The ALC in
the IC-706 doesn't work that way. If you want compression, you have
to turn the compressor on.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 07 10:15:08 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: IC-706 Rx sensitivity is ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4h6bt8$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 15:56:44 GMT

In article <4h6bt8$[e-mail]> Peter Shintani <[e-mail].
co.jp> writes:
>Hi
>I own an IC-706. I used it for a couple of months and find that the rx is bad
>atleast on HF.(6m seems ok if the preamp is turned on, I have yet to use 2m)
>Or atleast I think it is bad. For example, unless the preamp is turned on,
>it doesnt' receive much on HF. Furthermore when the pre-amp is turned on, the
>NF of the receiver seems to degrade considerably. When a low level signal
>ie under 10 uV (50 term) is applied to the receiver, it seems to become noise
r
>instead of quietening down. I didn't think that this is normal.

The simple test to determine if a receiver has adequate gain is to
find a quiet spot on the band (just outside the ham bands is usually
best) and compare the hiss with the antenna connected and disconnected.
If the noise increases when the antenna is connected, the receiver has
enough sensitivity. If the noise doesn't increase, it doesn't. My IC706
showed a noise increase with the antenna connected at 4.005 MHz when I
tried this a few minutes ago *without* the preamp turned on. I couldn't
hear a difference with the attenuator switched on, and the noise level
was excessively high with the preamp on. This "no equipment" test says
the receiver gain is about right for HF.

>Does anyone have
>any comments concerning on how to measure the NF  and sensitivity of an HF rx
.
> (I used an HP8640B as the signal source, being analog it's suppose to be
>pretty low noise, both am and phase wise)

Sure, just do a SINAD measurement. Modulate the source and adjust its
insertion level until the SINAD reads 12 db. You should see that at less
than 0.5 uV for this radio. (Ok, you need a SINADDER to do this easily.)
There is another way that will yield the 3 db sensitivity of the receiver.
Monitor the radio output with an audio voltmeter, and increase injected
signal strength until the audio output increases 3 db. Do this in CW or
SSB mode, no modulation on the signal. This point should also be less
than 0.5 uV for this radio, in fact less than 0.2 uV with the CW narrow
filter (preamp and attenuator OFF).

>The service man commented that it was with in spec. I rebutted  that when com
pared to
>other ICOM radio with the similar spec's, it doesn't hear as well. The servic
e man then
>commented that the margin between actual performance and the spec's is much l
ess
>with the IC-706 since the circuitry has been simplified to fit in the smaller
 box.
>
>I would appreciate any comments from people who have taken in their 706's
>in for repair for bad rx and how the complaint was handled.

I've had my IC-706 side by side with my IC-735. A/B tests show essentially
no difference in either radio's ability to hear weak signals on lower HF.
Both have adequate gain.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: (none)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 21:14:19 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> /PN=Scott.C.Werling/O=w
allace/PRMD=iadps/ADMD=attmail/C=us/@safe.ia.GOV writes:
>Hello all, I have an Alinco DJ 160 HT rugged unit, until lately.  I think it
>either got a power surge or something similar thru the mic connection.
>I had it wired up for use as the shack 2m radio.
>
>When I turn the HT on it is in VFO, at the default frq of 145.000 and xmit is
 stuck on.  No matter what I do it won't NOT xmit.  Also I can't change frqs a
t all.  I hate to Deep 6 the thing it has been vry dependable till this episod
e.  Any help appreciated.

Have you tried a full microprocessor reset?

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Reed)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ** FS : WINDOWS'95 CD UPGRADE  $50 **
Date: 10 Mar 1996 16:45:53 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hv101$[e-mail]>


SUBJECT: ** FS : WINDOWS'95 CD UPGRADE $50 **

I have still available a few Windows '95 CD-ROM Upgrade kits.

These are new, sealed, Microsoft Windows '95 CD-ROM Upgrade
Kits received with a computer order that I don not intend to use
with the computers they were received for.

These kits include the manual, CD-ROM disk, software registration
card, and Microsoft holographic Certificate of Authenticity.

The price is $ 50.00 each shipped by 2nd Day Priority Mail.

Send a check to  :

     Robert Reed WB2DIN
     538 Brewers Bridge Road
     Jackson, New Jersey 08527

     TEL : [phone]



73, Bob, WB2DIN


-
  ROBERT REED, WB2DIN           [e-mail]
  538 Brewers Bridge Road
  Jackson, New Jersey 08527      PACKET  WB2DIN@WT3V





From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB7ASR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec,radio.amateur.misc
Subject: 4-Sale, 1200 baud PSK moden
Date: 6 Mar 1996 16:38:59 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hkf33$[e-mail]>
References: <4hkenf$[e-mail]>


I have the TAPR 1200 baud PSK modem for the PK-232. Excellent condition,
fully functional. Complete with manual and I will ship

$50 US/Canada, west of the Mississippi river
$55 US/Canada, east of the Mississippi river
$50 plus shipping cost international

WB7ASR...
[e-mail]





From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (DykstraR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 8250 UART chip
Date: 6 Mar 1996 08:41:46 -0500
Message-ID: <4hk4mq$[e-mail]>
References: <4hj1lm$[e-mail]>

It's made by National Semiconductor, part number INS5820.  Also B and C
versions.

Western Digital made a WD8250, which might be the same part

Rick  KD8CP


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:51 1996
From: Rod Thompson <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: 7 Mar 1996 05:52:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlti4$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hj9vc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Dave Dredge <[e-mail]> wrote:
>How could they possibly tell how I programmed the radio.
>I have the Yeasu software and every time I have used it
>the radio has started doing strange things.
>
>In one case, it would no longer switch to low power.
>In another case, even though the freq showed correct in the
>display it was 5khz high in memory mode but not in vfo.
>
>I have stopped using the ADMS-1 stuff.
>
>Dave Dredge

Sorry for the problems you are having with the ADMS-1 software.  From the disc
ription
of the problems that you have stated I am assuming you have an FT-51.  An earl
y
version of the software did have a problem with the way the power output toggl
e and
the splinter channel toggle was backward.  If you will call (205-880-3093) or
e-mail
([e-mail]) with your address, I will send you an update program.  The update

program is a patch to the version you have and it must be installed for the up
date to
work.  We try to catch these things before they get sent out but sometimes thi
ngs get
overlooked.

1-205-880-3093

If I am not there just tell the person answering the phone that you need the u
pdate
program for the FT-51.  If you have a Compuserve account you can download it i
n the
HAMNET forum.

Let me know if you have any more problems.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:53 1996
From: Clark Fishman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best 1.5KW HF AMP?
Date: 3 Mar 1996 06:17:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4hbdhj$esa$[e-mail]>
References: <4h4pcn$[e-mail]>

I have Ten-Tec Titan and I'm very happy with it. Compact, runs
cool, puts out full power, stable, well built.

--
Jack Althouse K6NY


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: CBs
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 21:36:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnkuj$[e-mail]>
References: <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>

In article <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (Roger Ashton) wrote:
>I'm lookin around for some low cost cb with a range of a couple of
>miles. Anybody got any suggestions ?
>

  Better to ask on rec.radio.cb

Tom



   Tom Randall            Amateur Radio - KB2SMS
   [e-mail]       Mt. Beacon Amateur Radio Club / ARRL
                          Member: AAVSO Solar Division

   Opinions herein are mine and they are not that of MHV.NET!


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Don Payne <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: CBs
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
References: <4h9vsj$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 04:19:47 GMT

Yep! Try Copper Electronics in Louisville, KY. 47 page catalog loaded
with stuff. They got 40 channel radios as low as 29 dollars! I think some
radios are refurbished but are like new with warrantee, etc. They have a
very nice web site with on-line catalog. The URL is
http://www.iglou.com/copper/   The telephone number is 1-800-626-6343.
You didn't mention what the primary use for the radios will be, hunting,
boating, car to car, neighborhood crime watch, etc. Sometimes walkee
talkees suit the need better than a mobile radio. Radio Schlack has some
OK walkee talkees but I don't care for their overpriced consumer grade
mobile units. Good-Luck!!

Kindest Ragards,

Don Payne
Chief Engineer, WZPL-FM /Indianapolis, IN



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:56 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Drake TR4 Audio Problem
Date: 7 Mar 1996 16:43:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4hnla8$[e-mail]>

In article <4hislj$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (K1EL) writes:
>Hi All, I have a problem with my Drake TR4 that I have been fighting for
>some time now and can't seem to figure it out. The receiver has good
>sensitivity and good quality audio when receiving weak signals. On strong
>signals the receiver acts as if it is overloading, distorting badly. I
>first thought that the AGC circuit might not be working properly. But in
>checking the AGC voltage it looks OK, directly coresponding to signal
>strength. Another clue is that the S-meter is deflecting properly which
>again tells me the AGC is working OK. I have checked tubes and other
>components and can't seem to find anything amiss. Any ideas would be
>greatly appreciated
>
>Thanks es 73s de Steve K1EL
>
Check the IF stage that is not in the bridge circuit for the AGC.

A give away may be distortion in the SSB function since the rig shares much
circuitry between transmit and receiver function.

73's  Dick K8WHA


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:57 1996
From: Adriano Sgarbi <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ELECTRONIC TESTING EQUIPMENTS
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 10:48:01 +0100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

ELECTRONIC TESTING EQUIPMENTS at

http://www.datas.it/~aea/


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:58 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (SARUMAN)
Subject: Re: FS 2 Meter Mobile
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hkkju$[e-mail]> <4hkkn2$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 23:22:11 GMT

>By the way, I hope I have posted this to the right newsgroup.  If not,
>please advise where I can post this!

>Thanks,

>Dwain
>N0MKB

 There's a swap group too tho I doubt many would complain on yer posting here.


<tsb>
                               Midgard Graphics
           3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer
                          Email: [e-mail]

--
          Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime

--

<tsb>

                     A man of many hobby's master of none.




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Fire Fighter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS 2 Meter Mobile
Date: 6 Mar 1996 18:13:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkkju$[e-mail]>

Hello...If anyone is interested, I have a 2 meter mobiel radio for sale.
It is the Radio Shack HTX-212.  I know it is not the best radio on the
market, but it is a great starter radio.  It works great and was not used
much over a year.  I have the mounting hardware and the owners manual to
go with it.  I am asking $150.00, or best offer.

It is in great condition.  Please let me know if anyone is interested.
You can send email to [e-mail]

Thanks,

Dwain



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:20:59 1996
From: douglas marx <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FS 2 Meter Mobile
Date: 7 Mar 1996 00:49:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlbqv$[e-mail]>
References: <4hkkju$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

am interested in your radio
HAS ANY MODS BEEN ATEMPTED AND DOES IT WORK
IS IT BEAT UP
IF THE ANSWER IS NO
PLEASE CALL 1-610-588-4545
DOUG




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:00 1996
From: Mike <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner
Subject: FS Motorola Radios
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 16:19:52 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

The Following Motorola Portables are For Sale
All Radios Come with Battery and Antenna

GP-300 UHF 403-430 5-Tone w/KP/Full Display....$275.00
MT-1000 UHF 16Ch...............................$425.00
MT-1000 UHF 99Ch. w/MDC-1200 Front.............$500.00
SABER III UHF 120Ch............................$550.00
SABER II UHF 120Ch.............................$525.00
HT-1000 UHF 450-520 16Ch.......................$500.00
HT-1000 VHF 136-174 16Ch.......................$500.00
MTX-LS 900-LTR TRK & CONV......................$500.00
VISAR 800-TRK TYPE II/IIi......................$575.00
Maxtrac 800 Mobile 6/6/2.......................$350.00

PLEASE CALL 1-800-773-3465 AND LEAVE A MESSAGE


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Borzelleri)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS-Lots of Motorola Equipment
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 01:10:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4htalr$[e-mail]>

JUST ARRIVED 3/9/96 !


Lots of Motorola,Uniden & misc brands & accessories.

List to big to fit,please leave a fax number & list will be faxed to
you.


Thanks,



Steve Borzelleri
Sutter Buttes 2-Way
P.O. Box 3419.
Yuba City, CA 95992
916.674.7532
Fax [phone]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:02 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: FRG-100
Date: 7 Mar 1996 18:44:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnaph$[e-mail]>

For Sale Yaesu FRG-100 Communications Receiver
SSB CW AM AM narrow
10hz resolution in SSB and CW
100hz resolution in AM
50 memories
manua,l box and power supply included
$375 plus shipping from SEATTLE
stephen eastman
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:03 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: RF signal generator
Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:12:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsl7c$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

For sale:       1.  Tektronix 191 RF signal generator
                     0.35 - 100 MHz operation with attenuator
                     and manual.
                     $75

                I can be reached at [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Richmann)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Tubes
Date: 3 Mar 1996 19:42:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4hde94$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Richmann)

The following tubes were aquired from the estate of an old-time Ham
operator in the Cincinnati area.  All are untested.  I have no use for
them and offer them for sale as a lot, or trade for collectable table
radio(s).

Expand to full screen for easy viewing.


Type (used)

       Price each, New, from AES catalog

CWL 803, Westinghouse                           24.00
VT225/307A, Sylvania (2)                                ?
RK837/CRP837, Raytheon                          6.40
837, ?  (no top cap)                            6.40
CKR837/VT101, Kenrad                            6.40
1625/VT136, RCA                                 4.00
955, ? (3)                                      4.00
826, RCA (2)                                    34.40
1626/VT137, RCA                                 3.20
0D3/VR150/VT139, (1) Hytron (1) RCA                           3.60
GL-6146, GE (2)                                 unlisted
VT-51, ? (2)                                    unlisted
HV114B, Hytron                                  2.70
VT131, RCA                                      unlisted
HY75A, Hytron (2)                                       unlisted
13AP1, RCA                                      unlisted


The following are new:
JAN-809, RCA (2)                                        34.50
837, RCA (3)                                    6.40

E-mail to: [e-mail]

Regards,

Rich




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:05 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: VSWR and Dummy load
Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:10:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsl2n$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

For sale:       1.  Jones Micromatch 4W VSWR meter, N-conn
                     on each end.  $100

                2.  Jones Micromatch 120W VSWR meter, N-conn
                     on each end.  New case and meter movement.
                     $75

                3.  Electro Impulse Lab ME-11A/U 60W dummy load
                    and wattmeter.  Good through 500Mhz.  $75

                4.  Bird 8713 1KW water cooled dummy load.  Type LC
                    connector, I think.  $50

                I can be reached at [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:06 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tom Nicolaides)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Wilson 77 foot Self-supporting tower
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 96 16:14:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsalr$[e-mail]>

Wilson ST77 Tubular crankup tower:

- motorized winch for hoisting
- built in gin pole with hand winch for tilt-over
- Ham 4 rotor
- Cushcraft A3S three element tri band beam
- Cushcraft Rotatable dipole for 30, 17 and 12 meters
- Hi-gain 40 meter rotatable dipole
- Ringo Ranger 2 for two meters
- tower rated for 17 sq ft wind area

$1700 takes all, shipping to be negotiated

call Tom Nicolaides, WA5ZCC
504.649-3847
email [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dean Denter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ft-530: Safe to use "AA" nicads with batt. case?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 14:44:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhk1b$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
        Jeff Clark <[e-mail]> writes:
>I recently bought the "AA" battery case as a cheap backup battery for my
>Yaesu ft-530 with the idea that I would fill it with Ni-cad "AA"s.
>Unfortunately the manual indicates that the case "lacks the necessary
>thermal & over-current protection circuits..." & "must not be used with
>rechargable cells".
>
>I'm assuming that it is safe to use "AA" nicads for Rx/Tx but that Yaesu
>would rather I didn't charge the cells while attached to the radio (via
>the external DC jack on top of the case) because the case lacks a current
>limiting circuit.
>
>Does anyone have any experience with Ni-cads & the FBA-12 battery case?
>

They work fine for me.  The warning is there so that if they do happen
to cause a problem, Yaesu doesn't get held responsible.  There is no
difference between using nicads in the fba-12 vs. using alkalines,
as long as you are not charging the cells.

I charge mine using a standard nicad charger, with the cells removed from
the case.  They may get charged once in a while in the battery case if
I happen to forget to remove the battery case when I hook the radio up to
the cig-lighter adapter in the car, but this hasn't caused a problem so
far.

Using the fba-12 has several advantages too:
        - The batteries are cheaper (got my last set of 20 cells for
                $17 from tower hobbies).
        - In an emergency, AA cells are easier to get your hands on than
                a Yaesu battery pack.
        - Its easier to squeeze in 6 extra loose cells into a full hiking
                pack than a similar 7.2V battery pack (you haven't seen me
                pack -- when I've finished packing, nothing else fits in
                the pack :).

regards,
Dean.
--
Dean Denter                work -> [e-mail]
VA3CDD                     play -> [e-mail]
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[I speak only for myself]]]]]]]]]]]]]]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (TeaForOne)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-736GX Info Needed.....!
Date: 6 Mar 1996 22:07:44 -0500
Message-ID: <4hlju0$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TeaForOne)

Hi and thanks for reading this.
Name here is Rich, in NY.
Have an opportunity to buy this radio w/ 6M 2M and 70cm FM modules
installed.
Could some owners of this rig give me the lowdown on the radio?
What is the going rate on the used market?

Thanks very much for the help!

73 de KB2TMA

Richard Florio -- [e-mail]
Generated  10:07:29 p on 3.6.96



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tom Griffin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT707 / FT77 / TS120S  ?
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:21:59 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h6pa5$[e-mail]>

In rec.radio.amateur.equipment on 1 Mar 1996 12:07:33 GMT,
[e-mail] (MAILLET D.) wrote:

>
>FT707 or FT77 or TS120S ?
>ps help me for make a choise for 2░ rig.
>use in 12V; portable; CW (filter 500 hz ?)
>tnx DOMY.
>[e-mail]
>
>
I had a FT 707 but sold it in '86. Wished I'd kept it. Hauled it to
Germany then shipped it to Korea. Sturdy.

Tom Griffin
ex: WH6IIJ      DA2MR           HL9/WB4YXA


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 17:32:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn6q3$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:

>The reason for this is that restricted bandwidth electromagnetic
>transducers have high THD (5% to 10% is not uncommon), and excessive
>phase distortion, and that leads to listener fatigue.

Hi Gary,

My concern with stereo 'phones is that their lighter-weight voice
coils don't seem to hold up well in communications use.  Single tones
stress the elements much more than music, even rock, and I've blown
every pair I've ever owned working CW.  Generally, the symptom is one
of voice coil overheating, which causes the elements to buzz due to
distortion of the coil form.

Incidentally, there's no reason why a restricted bandwidth or higher
power handling transducer should automatically incur increased THD.
In fact, some of the differences that provide these characteristics
(like increased stiffness of the mechanical components) should improve
linearity and reduce THD.  This is readily apparent if one compares
the specifications of a midrange speaker driver to a full-range,
single-cone design.

Regarding phase shift, I would question whether this is detectable
over the communications bandwidth without test equipment, regardless
of the type of headphone.  I think phase shift over that range is
really insignificant, particularly in a small, single-diaphragm
transducer.

Another thing about stereo 'phones is that the drivers themselves are
necessarily heavier than limited-bandwidth versions for a given SPL
and power handling capability.  It's the pressure of the headband and
weight of the drivers (and sometimes uncomfortable cushions) that
usually wears me out, not distortion or phase shift.  Compared to most
cone speakers, even cheap headphones usually sound superb.

Anyway, I'm looking for a set of 'phones myself and a friend recently
recommended the Yaesu YH55.  They're available for less than $40.00,
and according to him, they are true 8 ohm communications headphones.
I'd appreciate comments if anyone here has ever used this model.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 17:51:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn7sl$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hkrvb$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG) wrote:

>I agree with Gary.  I use a nice set of Realistic stereo
>headphones, full size with full coverage leather earcups
>and padded, leather covered headband.  Been using them
>for years.

Anyone buying on this recommendation should be careful.  Newer models
are not the same and I suspect (emphasis on "suspect") that even those
marked Taiwan are being manufactured in China.  The quality is not
nearly as good as the older Japanese products, and I'm speaking from
experience here.  A pair that I bought just after Christmas fell apart
in three places in less than a month.

The best advice is to take your time, shop around, and make the
decision carefully.  There's a lot of junk on the market and it's
easier than ever to throw your money away.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:12 1996
From: Joe Fitter  BV/N0IAT <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: 6 Mar 1996 11:31:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4hjt1v$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Steve,

I have had good luck using some Sony headphones from a
"Sony Sport Walkman".  These are yellow colored, and
actually fit into the ear canal instead of the traditional
'phones that cover the ear.

I find the fidelity super, and they are very lightweight.
Also, the cord is kinda "tangle proof" and easy to spot since
it is bright yellow colored.

Only catch is that these are stereo.   A stereo to mono
adapter should solve this problem.  Most newer HF rigs use
the stereo phones jack anyway.

Price for replacement is well under 20 bucks too....

Joe in Taiwan



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:13 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hn6q3$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 20:58:07 GMT

In article <4hn6q3$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (WB
3U) writes:
>   [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>
>>The reason for this is that restricted bandwidth electromagnetic
>>transducers have high THD (5% to 10% is not uncommon), and excessive
>>phase distortion, and that leads to listener fatigue.
>
>Hi Gary,
>
>My concern with stereo 'phones is that their lighter-weight voice
>coils don't seem to hold up well in communications use.  Single tones
>stress the elements much more than music, even rock, and I've blown
>every pair I've ever owned working CW.  Generally, the symptom is one
>of voice coil overheating, which causes the elements to buzz due to
>distortion of the coil form.

Try a pair of Koss PortaPros. If you can blow them before you blow
your eardrums, I'll be very surprised. They'll handle the output
of a 100 watt audio amp for longer than you can stand the noise
*from across the room*. They're also the lightest and most comfortable
headphones I've ever used. I often wear them for 8 hours at a stretch,
and then walk away from the console forgetting I still have them on.

>Incidentally, there's no reason why a restricted bandwidth or higher
>power handling transducer should automatically incur increased THD.
>In fact, some of the differences that provide these characteristics
>(like increased stiffness of the mechanical components) should improve
>linearity and reduce THD.  This is readily apparent if one compares
>the specifications of a midrange speaker driver to a full-range,
>single-cone design.

That's not the problem. Any *good* stereophone transducer will be
far more rigid than any speaker cone. And that translates into
super high frequency response. To get rid of that high frequency
response, you have to damp the diaphram, and that automatically
introduces distortion.

>Regarding phase shift, I would question whether this is detectable
>over the communications bandwidth without test equipment, regardless
>of the type of headphone.  I think phase shift over that range is
>really insignificant, particularly in a small, single-diaphragm
>transducer.

Certainly it is less than in a loudspeaker, but I can still hear
it, and it is fatiguing.

>Another thing about stereo 'phones is that the drivers themselves are
>necessarily heavier than limited-bandwidth versions for a given SPL
>and power handling capability.  It's the pressure of the headband and
>weight of the drivers (and sometimes uncomfortable cushions) that
>usually wears me out, not distortion or phase shift.  Compared to most
>cone speakers, even cheap headphones usually sound superb.

You obviously haven't tried a *good* pair of stereophones. Quit buying
junk and buy a pair of PortaPros. You'll never use anything else. The
difference between these phones and the typical "communications" headset
is like the difference between a pair of Martin Logan speakers ($3500 *each*)
and a Radio Shack boombox. And the PortaPro is well under $100. (Note,
accept no substitute, Koss makes more expensive headsets, but they don't
sound or feel as good.)

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.shortwave
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:18:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkrvb$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

I agree with Gary.  I use a nice set of Realistic stereo
headphones, full size with full coverage leather earcups
and padded, leather covered headband.  Been using them
for years.  Their sound quality is great.  I've tried the
"communications" types, and the "walkman" types, and have
found that they just don't cut it.  A good quality hi-fi
stereo headset is the way to go.

YMMV, as always.     73 de KC5NG



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Sean McCarthy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Heath SA2060(a) differences, question
Date: 7 Mar 1996 00:04:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4hl969$[e-mail]>


Hi,

Can anyone tell me the differences between the Heath SA-2060 and
the SA-2060A?

Thanks,
Sean


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:17 1996
From: Jarmo Raisanen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help ! ADI sender 145 Broken
Date: 5 Mar 1996 14:28:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhj39$[e-mail]>

Does anyone know how to reset ADI Sender 145 2m handheld.
Dispalay is blinking when power is turned on.
There is no other function. At least ICOMs have some kind
of reset function, how about ADI ?

If you have any information, please email:

[e-mail]

73 de Jami OH7JR


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:17 1996
From: James Weber <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Yeasu
Date: 8 Mar 1996 19:44:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4hq2na$[e-mail]>

My son is a new ham and I would like to buy him a radio. I can get a
Yeasu FT-101EX or a new Yeasu FT840. Which is the better radio, and why?



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael T. Hodgson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help!  ICOM IC751
Date: 10 Mar 1996 01:54:19 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

if this is like my 71a's and 7000's you must send it back to ICOM
to fix the problem...figure about $180.00 if i remember right.


Mike



In article <[e-mail]>, Joshy M George
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> Could anybody help me to fix a rig (ICOM IC751).
> It seems the small RAM (it looks like that) has lost its contents.
> The battery on board is drained off.
> Thanks

--
Mike - Raleigh, NC USA

Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not in any way
represent those of my employer.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:20 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 20:29:06 GMT

In article <4hk62p$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Robert Selman) writes:
>I've been suffering a loud noise when I start the car.  It is not
>ignition noise, but the altenator is making the "hash"...  Does anyone
>have a possible fix?  I've placed a ground on the back of the tail pipe
>which is killing the ignition noise, but need to find a fix for the
>"hash" sound when the car is running.

Well first of all, are you *sure* that the noise is coming from
the alternator? Alternator noise usually has a musical "whine"
sound to it, not a harsh hashy sound. You don't say what make
and model car you have, but the problem could be an electric
fuel pump, or a sensor, or the fuel injector drivers. A sure
way to confirm it's the alternator is to take off the alternator
drive belt temporarily and start the engine. If the noise is gone,
it was the alternator. If the noise is still there, it's something
else.

If it is the alternator, it would be a good idea to check the
alternator brushes. If they are badly worn, you can get arcing
there. Another possibility is that one of the alternator diodes
is bad. And of course, the condenser on the alternator output
that's supposed to suppress residual noise could be bad. Or it
could be a bad ground somewhere in the charging circuit allowing
alternator ripple to modulate the power to your radio, IE a classic
ground loop.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Selman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 6 Mar 1996 14:05:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4hk62p$[e-mail]>

I've been suffering a loud noise when I start the car.  It is not
ignition noise, but the altenator is making the "hash"...  Does anyone
have a possible fix?  I've placed a ground on the back of the tail pipe
which is killing the ignition noise, but need to find a fix for the
"hash" sound when the car is running.

By the way I'm using an IC-706, 600 watt amp and DK3 and find all work
excellent.  Would like to now get rid of this hash.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Doc  WE6A


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:21 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How do I program an ICOM U400 mobile?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 17:51:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn7n7$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

In <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (M. Davies) writes:
>
>I'm sure it's with the keys and not a RIB box, but that's all I know!
>Any ideas?

You need the ICOM programming unit that plugs into the front of the radio
or a U16 Icom HT (which CAN be keypad programmed) and a cloning cable.




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How do I program an ICOM U400 mobile?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 22:22:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnnio$[e-mail]>
References: <4hn7n7$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] writes:
>In <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (M. Davies) writes:
>>I'm sure it's with the keys and not a RIB box, but that's all I know!
>>Any ideas?
>You need the ICOM programming unit that plugs into the front of the radio
>or a U16 Icom HT (which CAN be keypad programmed) and a cloning cable.

Yes, the Icom U-400 programs using the ICOM FREQUENCY PROGRAMMER EX-494. Or
you can use a ICOM CLONING CABLE OPC-138 to transfer memory contents in
a IC-U16 UHF Portable to the U-400. Suggest contacting an Icom dealer. This
radio should not cost more than about $15 to do. If you provide all the
transmit, receive and PL info they can do it inside of 15 minutes.

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christopher A. King)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: How does a Hammarlund HQ - 180 work?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 17:17:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn5mf$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4gt29s$[e-mail]> <4h5n3l$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]

says...
>
>I am just getting into HAM and a friend just loaned me a
>Hammarlund HQ - 180.  It's old, but it seems to work.  I don't know
>how to use much of it.  I did find an AM station, but there are
>sure a lot of dails and stuff.
>
>Is there anyone out there who has one that could
>let me know a little about using it.

Tuning stations in on an HQ-180 is a bit more work than on the
average receiver.

The controls that you will use most often are the band selector
switch (the six-position rotary in the center of the front panel,
near the bottom), the main tuning knob (large knob on the left),
and the antenna trimmer (small knob at the lower left corner).

The band selector and main tuning knobs are intuitive... but pay
close attention to the antenna trimmer, as this can have a marked
effect on received signal strength, especially if you switch to
different bands using the selector.  Probably the best approach
is to tune to the general area that you wish to receive stations,
peak the trimmer for the strongest signal -- or the most background
noise if no station is present at that point on the dial -- and
then go for your stations from there.  When you bring one in, you
can go back and fine-tune the antenna trimmer for maximum signal
strength on the meter.

Also note that the notch filter needs to be off to either side of
the center frequency, preferably maximum (I leave mine full coun-
terclockwise).  If you have this at zero, you're notching out
whatever you are trying to tune in... :^)

Other adjustments beyond this are ancillary, such as bandspread
(unless you do a lot of ham listening, then it gets used more
often), selectivity (again, unless you do a lot of ham listening;
I leave mine at 3Kcs 99.9% of the time).  Vernier tuning does
not seem to accomplish much more than the main tuning if the
receiver is properly aligned.  Medium AVC response seems to work
best for general listening... noise limiter off for best sound...
crystal calibrator is useful to see how poorly the dial tracks
:^) ...

Hope this helps...

C.K.




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Benkoski)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: How does a Hammarlund HQ - 180 work?
Date: 6 Mar 1996 04:18:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4hj3mm$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4gt29s$[e-mail]> <4h5n3l$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hct8e$[e-mail]>

John Kolb ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Eric E. Palmer ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : I am just getting into HAM and a friend just loaned me a
: : Hammarlund HQ - 180.  It's old, but it seems to work.  I don't know
: : how to use much of it.  I did find an AM station, but there are
: : sure a lot of dails and stuff.

: Yes, there are very few radios that have as many knobs as the HQ-180.
: Not an ideal radio to start with, perhaps. Band switch, main tuning
: and bandspread tuning are used to select the desired station. For the
: ham bands, if the main tuning is set to the correct postion, then
: the bandspread dial freqs can be read directly as the correct freq.
: On other freqs, the bandspread knob is used for fine tune only.

: Most of the controls are used as part of the IF section for avoiding
: interference. There is a notch filter, called Slot Frequency control
: which is tuned to null out a carrier near the desired freq. Leave
: turned all the way to one side or the other when not required.
: The Vernier tuning control is used for very fine tuning. This controls
: the conversion from the second IF, 455 kHz to the 3rd IF, 60 kHz,
: so tuning this does not affect the setting of the notch filter.
: Bandwidth and sideband selector controls are used to select the
: bandwidth you receive with and vary depending on the mode of the
: received station, AM or sideband, as well as how much noise and
: interference is on the station.

: I can provide a 3rd generation copy of the manual for $6.00 -
: rather poor pictures, which will have much greater detail.

: John Kolb
: 540 S. Kalbaugh St.
: Ramona, CA 92065

How does my HQ-180 work? .......... just fine thank you!


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:26 1996
From: Gene Shablygin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: how much is a Collins KWM2 worth?
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 96 01:54:54 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hjd5d$[e-mail]>  <4hrb88$[e-mail]>


> i'm a collector of antique technology and have an opportunity
> to buy a beautiful old radio from the original owner.  This
> thing is called a KWM2 transceiver made by Collins Radio.
> He wants a couple of hundred for it because he says it still
> works well and i'm trying to decide if it's worth that.  any
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> --
> Steve Davis .................. telephone: [phone] .........
> Nikodyne Technologies .............. fax: [phone] .........
> 1524 Adobe Trail ................. email: [e-mail] .......
> Canton, Georgia  30314 ............ http://tiberius.auc.edu/~sld .
>

If it is in good shape, it should worth more than $200! Today the
average proce for KWM2 is about $300-400 (depending on options, age
and condition).

You will hardly find one cheaper, so go for it!

Gene



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:27 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: how much is a Collins KWM2 worth?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hjd5d$[e-mail]> <4hrb88$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 17:42:44 GMT

In article <4hrb88$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Steve Davis) writes:
>i'm a collector of antique technology and have an opportunity
>to buy a beautiful old radio from the original owner.  This
>thing is called a KWM2 transceiver made by Collins Radio.
>He wants a couple of hundred for it because he says it still
>works well and i'm trying to decide if it's worth that.  any
>help would be greatly appreciated.

<snicker> A working KWM-2 for $200? Naw, you don't want it, but could
you send me the fellow's telephone number? :-)

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:29 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: how much is a Collins KWM2 worth?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: Bill <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Mar 96 11:11:46 CST
References: <4hjd5d$[e-mail]> <4hrb88$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Holy ROUND EMBLEM batman...a "working" KWM2 for $200.
Yes Robin, but careful now..this looks like the work of the Joker!

But seriously folks...

I'll take it right now for the parts. I might even pay shipping!

Remember...if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!

73s

Bill Worthington
AA4FM/0
Eudora, Kansas, USA
Collector:  Collins & Drake



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert J. Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much power does an antenna tuner use?
Date: 6 Mar 96 23:45:54 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960306184253.15075B-100000@DGS>
References: <[e-mail]>

  Regarding a simple answer to the question, I think it was Einstein who
said:  "For every problem there is an answer which is quick, simple, and
wrong."

73 de Bob  w3otc


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 15:25:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4hmvbm$[e-mail]>
References: <4hhmhs$[e-mail]> <4hi65f$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:

>Tuners have yet to catch up with the times.

Sure they have.  This is the era of disposable junk.  Most
manufacturers have already adapted.  :)

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 15:31:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4hmvnf$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hku01$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:

>If the amplifier is abused, and operated beyond design values, it
>will produce more output power. But the cooling system, power supply,
>and tank components were all designed with 1 kw dc plate input power
>maximum as a goal.

Hi Tom,

I know the SB-220 has its limitations, but isn't the duty cucle of SSB
pretty similar to CW?  If so, 1500W input on CW would be acceptable,
as long as short key down times were observed.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:33 1996
From: "John D. Farr" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 01:25:46 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hfvas$[e-mail]> <4hhei6$[e-mail]> <4hhmhs$[e-mail]>

Stan Huntting wrote:
>
> In article <4hhei6$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
> >The actual number can vary from a small fraction of a dB to a perhaps a
> >couple of dB, depending on the operating Q and the components unloaded Q,
> >and that all depends on how the operater sets the knobs and what the load
> >impedance is.
>
> Even Tom's reasoned response is conservative when he suggests that the corre
ct
> figure could reach "a couple of dB". Let me relate a non-quantitative
> experience that illustrates how serious this loss can be.
>
> I was using a commercial tuner from a large company whose last initial is
> reputed to stand for "Junk". The tuner was rated to handle "3 KW", and has t
he
> attractive feature of only TWO tuning controls. I was operating rtty into a
> Hygain rotatable dipole at 80' above ground, on a frequency that was about 1
00
> kHz below resonance The antenna is very narrow due to its linear loading so
I
> was using the tuner. Less than two minutes into a transmission there was a a
rc
> from the tuner and I was off the air. Examination showed that the polymer fo
rm
> that supports the roller inductor had deformed from heat and the roller
> inductor now looked like the sway back of an old nag. Needless to say, it no
> longer rolled.
>
> This is a long way from approximating a laboratory calorimeter, but the fact
> remains that what destroyed that tuner was heat, and that heat came from los
ses
> in the tuner circuit. Now the shocker: at the time, I was operating barefoot
 at
> 150 watts! To melt that form during a two minute operation at 150 watts
> suggests that the wonderful two-control design had yielded an operating poin
t
> at which the circulating currents were outrageous! The circuit is nothing mo
re
> than the common series-capacitance/shunt-inductance Tee-match with the addit
ion
> of capacitors that are ganged differentially. Exactly the same operating poi
nt
> could be achieved with any other three control, Tee-match tuner.
>
> An article published in QST a while back provides some real insite into just
> how high the losses in antenna tuners can reach. It should be required readi
ng
> for those interested in this thread. 73,
>
> Stan
> --
> Stan Huntting,    KF0IA
> email:            [e-mail]
> fax:              303 444 2314
> KaWin home page:  http://www.mutadv.com/kawin/
> KaWin FTP site:   ftp://ftp.csn.net/kawin
> postal address:   4655 Pleasant Ridge Rd.,
>                   Boulder, CO 80301-1731, USA


Sounds like an arc, not an ohmic heating.

John KC4ZXX


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jari Jokiniemi)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 06 Mar 1996 06:11:21 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hhmhs$[e-mail]> <4hi65f$[e-mail]>

How can SB-220 produce so little output as 600 W in CW? I have a
SB-200 which seems to produce just about the same, around 500-600 W
out in CW depending on the band in question. SB-200 has two 572B's and
SB-220 has two 3-500Z's, so the SB-220 should definetely do better
than 600 W in CW.
--
Jari Jokiniemi, [e-mail], OH2MPO, OH3BU
Tekla Oy, Koronakatu 1, 02210 Espoo, 90-8879 474


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:35 1996
From: Cecil Moore <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 8 Mar 1996 23:43:14 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hqgmi$[e-mail]>
References: <4hhmhs$[e-mail]> <4hi65f$[e-mail]> <4hmvbm$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (WB3U) wrote:
>   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:
>
>>Tuners have yet to catch up with the times.
>
>Sure they have.  This is the era of disposable junk.  Most
>manufacturers have already adapted.  :) 73, Jack  WB3U

Hi guys, I've acquired two rotary inductors, two hi-voltage caps, and
a 10p-5t hi-voltage ceramic switch. Two configurations are obvious for
a balanced tuner - coils in series and caps in parallel and visa versa.
That leaves me 3 more positions - any suggestions?

73, Cecil, KG7BK, OOTC  (not speaking for my employer)




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (robbin decker)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 22:43:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4hvlr4$[e-mail]>
References: <4hmvnf$[e-mail]> <4hu43u$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:
! The waveshape would also stink, the HV would sag
>like an 80 year old Dolly Parton at the current required to make 1500
>watts out. And the transformer and rectifiers would soon be history.

>Other than that, the amp would be fine <snicker>.

>73 Tom
Just a thought, Dolly will probably be buried in a specially formed
coffin (with obvious allocation for certain dimensions) due to the
fact that synthetics with roughly the half life of plutonium will most
certainly not sag in our great grandchildrens' lives, much less ours!
:):) :)

Bill



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (M.F.P.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HOW TO REPROGRAM 2WAY RADIO-MOTOROLLA
Date: 3 Mar 1996 16:47:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4hcies$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article
<[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] says...
>
>----- Message Text -----
>
>I  have a motorola 2-way radio that has 2 channels on it (model radius
>p200), and would like to change the frequency. I opened it up, and
>there
>is just one big metal box inside of it. Please e-mail me if you have any
>ideas. Or, if you are familiar with use of this particular radio. Please
>e-mail me as well.
>
>Thanks alot.
>
><[e-mail]>
>
You need to buy the RIB BOX and software.......(It's cheaper to go have your
dealer do it)



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gregory K Doerschler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT Battery Suppliers - Who the Best?
Date: 10 Mar 1996 08:01:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4hu28j$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, Alan Raskind  <[e-mail]> wrote
:
>
>I guess my real question is that if Periphex doesn't want to support the
>amateur community, who should we go to for batteries other than the OEM
>HT suppliers?  I personally have never bought any W&W Associates
>batteries because I had "heard" that their cases were NOT well made and
>fit was poor.  Don't have any first hand knowledge on the quality of the
>NiCads they use or how they hold up.  I am tempted to go to them instead.

My experience with W&W has been mixed.  I recently ordered some AAA NiCd
cells with solder tabs from them, and had been told on the phone that W&W
manufactured the cells and they were rated at 220 mAH (a figure also
listed in their catalog).  It took W&W about a week to process the order,
and the cells which arrived were manufactured by Sanyo, not by W&W.  I
decided to use them anyway since I've had reasonably good luck with Sanyo
cells (although I do think there are better products on the market), but
after I got them soldered together I noticed they were only rated at 200 mAH
rather than 250 mAH; which is the rating of Sanyo's current AAA cells.

This got me wondering just how old the cells were, so I wrote to W&W and
asked them to explain the discrepancies.  A representative wrote back
saying that W&W does not manufacture cells, but uses Sanyo cells.  She
said the ones I was sold were one year old, and that they did not have any
of the newer 250 mAH cells; which I could have obtained elsewhere for the
same price.  Since I'd already installed the cells I decided that
returning them and re-ordering from another vendor wasn't worth the
hassle, but I don't think I'd order from W&W again. (One of the cells also
arrived with a broken solder tab, but I was still able to use it.)

The W&W battery packs which we've used in years past with our Motorola HTs
at work seemed to have a high incidence of premature failure.  When I
opened up one of the dead ones I noticed that the Sanyo cells inside were
specified for a 14-16 hr. standard charge or a 4-6 hr. rapid charge.
However, the Motorola rapid charger charges batteries at a 1 hr rate,
which the Sanyo cells apparently were not designed to handle.  Physically,
I don't recall noticing any difference in durability between the W&W packs
and the Motorola packs.

I'd say the company I've had the best luck with is E. H. Yost & Co. (MR.
NiCd); good products, prices, and service.  I've also used batteries from
TNR Technical Inc. on several occasions, but their prices have increased
to the point where I no longer consider them to be competitive with other
mail order establishments.  The current issue of "Radio Resource" has a
survey of aftermarket battery manufacturer products, but I don't know
how many of these companies manufacture packs for the amateur market.


                                                Greg




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:41 1996
From: Alan Raskind <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HT Battery Suppliers - Who the Best?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 10:48:54 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I read Mike Morris' posting (and the rest of the thread) on Periphex
with great interest.  My experience fortunately has not been nearly that
bad, but Ithink that's because I bought their batteries just after they
started selling them.  My batteries seemed to hold relatively well.  The
cases were well made, but one fit very snug and one was somewhat loose.

I guess my real question is that if Periphex doesn't want to support the
amateur community, who should we go to for batteries other than the OEM
HT suppliers?  I personally have never bought any W&W Associates
batteries because I had "heard" that their cases were NOT well made and
fit was poor.  Don't have any first hand knowledge on the quality of the
NiCads they use or how they hold up.  I am tempted to go to them instead.

So, if we hams stick together, companies that don't want to support us on
righteous issues, such as factory reversed batteries, etc., we should go
elsewhere.

I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
with W&W Associates.

How are their batteries?
Case quality and fit?
Life expectancy?
Nicad memory?
What about their Master Charger I that uses "delta negative voltage
detection" with the custom charging "cups"?
Does it work OK?
Does this charging method help improve the life of the battery?
What about the quality of the cups and chargers themselves?

Info on any other suppliers?

I'm sure that most of us will be very interested in these postings.

Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:42 1996
From: Bryan or Melissa Mierau <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: htx-212
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 17:24:08 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am looking for information on the htx-212. I have repaired a few units, that
 have had the pin diode on the receive
circuit, gone bad. Also have had a unit where the foil trace on one of the out
put coils has been shorted to the
ground plane of the unit. Has anyone else seen anything of these units.

Bryan


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (JRW)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-242?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 18:29:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4ha3ve$[e-mail]>

Anybody know anything about the HTX-242?

-JRW4


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:43 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC 275H Modifications
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 06:56:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4hjd5d$[e-mail]>

I need any modification to extend coverage for the IC275H 2 meter base
radio. Please post answers or e-mail  to above address.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:44 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mark Boyer)
Subject: IC-706
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mark Boyer)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 18:40:13 GMT

I bought one for use primarily as a base unit and for taking on the road
for Red Cross Emergency Services work.

I found that for VHF repeater work, unless I missed something in the
manual, I had to program all of the local repeaters.  There isn't a
standard band plan set up in memory for the correct offsets.  You need to
go in and manually set up the offset.  I did all the - offset repeaters
and then the + ones.

You have to step through all the channels to get to the memory channel
that you want.  This is one place where a multi function keypad mic would
come in handy if the the software  and hardware was set up this way.

Hopefully when the weather turns a little warmer in a few weeks I will be
able to get some antennas set up outside instead of the mag mounts on the
cold air return for the furnace and the dryer for the HF.

Other than these 2 faults I love the radio and it appears to do what I
want it to.


--
Mark Boyer VE3MJB   [e-mail]

HELP, HELP we're twapped in a Dash 8 going wound and wound.  A day in the
life at uAmps R us.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:46 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: IC-706
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 20:39:23 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark Bo
yer) writes:
>
>I found that for VHF repeater work, unless I missed something in the
>manual, I had to program all of the local repeaters.  There isn't a
>standard band plan set up in memory for the correct offsets.  You need to
>go in and manually set up the offset.  I did all the - offset repeaters
>and then the + ones.

This is probably because most countries don't have both + and - offsets
on 2m, in fact most countries only have 2 MHz at 2m. The radio seems to
have been rushed to the US market without all the changes that would make
it work the way we've become used to having a 2m radio work. I have a feeling
that Icom just slapped a 100 watt amp behind a Japanese market radio in this
case and didn't really think through all the changes that they normally
would make for a US market radio. Either that or the 2m coverage was an
afterthought on an otherwise HF+6m radio done for competitive advantage.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:47 1996
From: Paul Christensen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-775DSP vs. FT-1000MP?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 19:58:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnf61$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

>It looks like 1000MP is superior to 775DSP in many aspects. It is >quiter, mo
re user-friendly, and... MUCH cheaper (almost 1000 bucks >less).

It is.

>The biggest drawback of 1000MP is its "low" power (100 W), which is not >enou
gh for driving 2x3-500Z amplifier for full output.

Perhaps.  But in my case, my Alpha 77DX only requires 35 watts of drive
for 1500 watts output.  My FT-1000D with its 200-watt capability was
actually a drawback due to potential overdrive.

>The only other advantage of 775DSP I found is much better manual notch >filte
r.

In my opinion, the only drawback.  Actually, the "MP" is capable of 60+
dB of manual I.F. notching.  It just won't stay there long.  In fact,
there is a hole beneath the bottom cabinet cover (lower left-front) to
make the deep notch adjustment.  I placed a call to Yaesu this afternoon,
and I believe they have a warranty service bulettin upgrade for it.  Call
[phone], ext. 242 and ask for Norma.

-Paul, N9AZ









From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:48 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: IC-775DSP vs. FT-1000MP?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hsljl$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 20:18:31 GMT

Reading QST's review of the IC-775, I was disapointed at the keying
waveform. Seems that we have yet another dot chopper here. Being a cw
man, I couldn't live with that. I haven't seen the review for the MP yet
but reports show it has clean keying. The 870 has great keying and would
probably be my choice of the 3. Too, you don't need to buy the extra
filters for the 870. DSP does it all.


: Ought to live with a Kenwood 870 for a while before saying that, imho.
: I like the R4C, too, by the way.
: Glad you like your Yaesu, but I wouldn't trade an 870 to get one.  The
: 870 is the state of the art in receiver design, as of now.

: vy 73

: John


--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-775DSP vs. FT-1000MP?
Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:19:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsljl$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
says...
>

>Still, none of new digital radios can outperform old good Drake R4C with
>proper alignment and good filters! But to have all in one box, I think
>that today 1000MP is the best ham transceiver money can buy.

Ought to live with a Kenwood 870 for a while before saying that, imho.
I like the R4C, too, by the way.
Glad you like your Yaesu, but I wouldn't trade an 870 to get one.  The
870 is the state of the art in receiver design, as of now.

vy 73

John



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:50 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Stephen Lui)
Subject: Re: IC-W31A/IC-Z1A CTSS Decode and Tone Squelch Standard?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2902961138500001@192.0.2.1> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 15:13:27 GMT

In article <[e-mail]>,
Sam Lightbourne <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Stephen Lui ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: The HRO ad says that the IC-W31A and IC-Z1A both come standard withe 2.5
>: watts of power and CTSS decode standard, with the BP-180 battery. Does
>: this mean that they include the UT-94/UT-93 modules and also come withe
>: tone squelch, pocket beep, and tone scan? Is tone squelch controlled by a
>: CTSS tone or is like the DTMF paging feature of the FT-51R?
>
>: Stephen
>
>
>According to the manual, the UT-94 module is already installed
>in the USA version. It controls the tone squelch
>operation, the pocket beep and the tone scan functions.
>
>The code squelch function is controlled by DTMF.
>
>--
>[e-mail]
>Sam (ki4jj)

I just got my IC-Z1A last Friday, and the UT-93 comes in a little box. I still
have to open up the radio and install it. The $100 rebate brought the cost
down to $339, which I though was a really good deal.

Stephen
KF6BTE


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay Kesterson K0GU)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM  IC-706 Poor Mic Gain
Date: 6 Mar 1996 14:56:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4hk930$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hf4cf$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Mike Willis ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Jay Kesterson K0GU wrote:
: >
: > On a somewhat related subject. My 706 has rated output on HF and VHF
: > in the CW mode. However on SSB it only puts out about 30/40 watts on
: > HF and ~4 watts on 2m. If I whistle in the mike I get near CW output
: > but speech, no matter what the volume, produces the lower output.

: What do you expect! In SSB mode, the peak power is indeed 100W. With
: speech, the average duty cycle is something like 25%. With a processor
: or by shouting you can get this up to maybe 40%. Whistles are tones at
: the peak power, hence you see 100W. Unless you use a peak reading power
: meter, you will not see the actual peak power on SSB, but some average
: determined by the dynamics of the power meter.

I expected the meter reading to act like my other radios. As you (and
others) pointed out what I am seeing is a function of an average reading
meter. I'll explain how I made this mistake.

Both my FT-1000 and TS-930 easily put out 75+% of their CW value on SSB
using a average reading meter. A little testing at home last night
reminded me why. The IC-706 has AF processing, my other two rigs have
RF processing. The 706 puts out 100W on CW and I see about 30W on the
average meter on SSB. If I turn on the processing it adds three or four
more watts. My TS-930 puts out 110W on CW and about 40W average on SSB.
When I turn on the processor in the 930 the average power goes to 80W.
Its been about 20 years since I owned a rig without RF processing. I
forgot how much difference it make on the average. So it was indeed
pilot error on my part.

On a peak reading meter I do see a fair amount of power on the 706.
However on the other rigs, with RF processing, there is very little
difference between peak and average (as you would expect).

Thanks for the responses.

73, Jay  K0GU                  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:52 1996
From: [e-mail](Robert Miller )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM 271H 4 Sale
Date: 9 Mar 1996 00:38:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4hqjuq$[e-mail]>
References: <4hg4lh$[e-mail]>

In <4hg4lh$[e-mail]> [e-mail](Robert Miller
) writes:THIS RADIO HAS BEEN SOLD. THANKS TO ALL THAT ENQUIRED. BOB DE
AA5FL
>
>    Icom IC-271H for sale. 100 watt all mode 2 meter transceiver with
>built in Icom IC-PS35 switching type power supply.
>I am the second owner, the first owner lives in town. Radio is in
>excellent shape, works like new and I have the original box and owners
>manual. First $500 takes it, delivered to your door by UPS
>E-mail Robert Miller at 70007,2305 Compuserve
>or call evenings at 817 292 9565
>Thanks
>Bob Miller AA5FL



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:53 1996
From: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom Delta 1A Information Sought
Date: 11 Mar 1996 09:48:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0stp$[e-mail]>
References: <@í>

I'm wondering if anyone who has a Delta 1A could e-mail me their impressions o
f the rig? I'm thinking about picking one up now that the price has come down
and am interested in this rig's performance and features. I'm especially inter
ested in intermod rejection, frequency coverage (early vs. later, post ECPA, m
odels), it's relative size and battery life. I'd be interested in anything els
e anyone might consider useful, too.
I'd prefer responses via e-mail, but I do read the news occasionally, so that'
d be OK, too.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Manthe, N9AAT
E-mail: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:54 1996
From: Bill Schaff <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM IC-706
Date: 8 Mar 1996 17:00:48 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hpp40$[e-mail]>
References: <4hpndb$[e-mail]>

In article <4hpndb$[e-mail]> David Whitehurst,
[e-mail] writes:
>Subject: ICOM IC-706
>as anyone tried the IC706's 2M ssb & 6M ssb capabilites??

I used the 706 in the recent VHF contest on 2 and 6.  As a first
experience on these bands, I had a lot of fun.  Using indoor antennas, I
made a few dozen contacts, mostly within about one hundred miles.  A
couple of stations were more than 250 miles away (on 2 meters).  Everyone
that has heard the radio said that it sounded good.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Icom IC-736 Informat/mods?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]> <4hptrm$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 21:12:44 GMT

In article <4hptrm$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>
>Hows the noise from the speaker, even with the volume turned all the way
>down? Does it cover up weak signals? Does it drive you nuts with
>headphones on?
>
>Mine sure does.
>
>If you find a "fix" for that, there are plenty of others who would like
>to know. ICOM "Refuses" to do anything about it!!
>
>Bob Redoutey
>KF5KF
>Round Rock, TX
>[e-mail]

Well mine is quiet as the tomb with the volume turned down (in headphones),
the blankety blank *fan* makes enough noise to wake the dead though.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:57 1996
From: "Thomas W. Castle" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM memory systems - Info???
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 04:21:27 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Hi Tom here...      Having read several postings about brain dead -
Icoms: I wonder if anyone has worked with any of the after-market
suppliers of Icom memory..? This is not conventional memory. Icom
used a lithium battery to hold a programmed chip that could be up-
graded or changed as the bands were changed in the Hf rigs... Once
the battery died, the radio went brain <freq> dead...

I have seen several ads which listed a enhanced memory system with
expanded memory channels as well <200 I think>. Another ad went on
about a ROM moduel for the "Bands" an a eeprom for the mem channels.

Has anyone used or revived a dead Icom with one of these units???
If so I would like to hear from them. I understand that with one
company, they sell a generic unit that "must" be configured for the
perticular Icom you have... Would appreciate anyones personal experience
in dealing with this system.

Also could the "CAT" interface be used in conjunction with a new battery
an a "program" to reload the chip... Lets face it, thats all that
Icom is doing, they are reloading the volatile memory an supplying
a new battery. Has anyone used or have such a program, even if it
uses a chip programmer instead of a "CAT" interface..?

I also would like to know what other radio manufactures use a similar
system an the rigs in which they are used... Lets face it the batteries
in the rigs we see for SALE probably have never been changed an it
would be a real bummer to acquire one about a month before the battery
croaks....

A whole lot of questions with very interesting answers...

Tnx for your input on this...

DE Tom  a.k.a.  KD4QHH







From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:58 1996
From: dick furbush <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM MODS
Date: 5 Mar 1996 17:57:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4hhv9q$[e-mail]>

looking for mods for an Icom 02AT 2 mtr......expanded Rx & Tx???
help.......thanks....73s



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:21:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (ERIC MARLAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: info
Date: 8 Mar 1996 00:12:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnu1t$[e-mail]>




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:00 1996
From: David Mclean <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info about Alinco 610 mods!
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 02:34:15 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello all:

        I was wandering about two things about thw mods for the alinco 610.
First will they Void the Warenty. Second Will the Alinco 610 recive 800mhz.
If so how would I change the band to 800mhz. Thanks for the help!
--
                                                    David Mclean
                                              From The World of Hamradio
                                                   KC5NNV is Clear!

                                                      [Dfw-Hams]
                                              Http://www.dfw.net/~dmclean
_________________________________________________________________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info on Rat Shack Comp 100 Scanner
Date: 8 Mar 1996 04:06:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4hoboh$[e-mail]>
References: <4hlepb$[e-mail]>

Posted it on rec.radio.swap for ya.

Lennard Carpenter (lcarpent@freenet) wrote:
:   Need programming info or manual for the above scanner
: Thanks



: --

:          //               Amiga Corporation!
:         //              The Buttheads Blew IT!
:     \\ //                    Len Carpenter
:      \X/            ( [e-mail] )
:                  A Believer in Welland, Ontario Canada






From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (TLifland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info re: IC-706
Date: 2 Mar 1996 23:08:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4hb60m$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TLifland)

Hey you IC-706 users.  How's about a critique?  What do you like? What do
you hate? What do you recommend?  Any info about Icom mods to correct
audio and IMD short comings.  73 de W2RFU


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tom Guyer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Interface
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 21:33:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4hq931$[e-mail]>

        I would like to home brew an RS232 to TTL interface
for my Kenwood TS850sat.  Could someone help me out with a
circuit?  Thank you        Tom WB2ENV



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Intermod Probs
Date: 6 Mar 1996 09:09:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4hk6b3$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)

Scott: Get the notch filter that Gary just recommended,,,that wiould be my
suggestion. I think the company is called PAR electronics (?) they always
have a classified ad in QST..nice thing abt it is you won't lose ur 440
band since it is only notching out the pager freqs...I use one with my
Yaesu HT and it just abt eliminated all intermod around here in
Jacksonville (intermod capital of the Universe).
73's Mike KS4DA


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:04 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 21:43:00 -0600
Subject: Kenwood lamps for TM-x21a

Can anyone inform me of the voltage of the light bulbs used in Kenwood
TM-x21a radios?  (Mine is a TM-421a UHF.)

     Regards, TOM BLACKWELL, N5GAR, PO Box 25403, Dallas, Texas 75225
              [e-mail]           ARRL SGL-North Texas
                      The NTPCUG's TI PRO BBS lives at [phone]

---
 ■ SLMR 2.1a ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (J. Miner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TH79A vs. Yeasu FT-51R
Date: 8 Mar 1996 02:52:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4ho7dt$[e-mail]>

Hello,

I am interested in a New Dual Band HT.  I was wounder if anyone owning or
expermenting with the TH-79a or the FT-51R, can give me there views of
the radio.  One on the main things I am worried about is intermod.

Thanks and 73,
Jon N2XFZ


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Key jack placement...
Date: 3 Mar 1996 18:24:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4hco52$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hcgj8$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ) writes:
>>Nice try on justifying the demise of the CW requirement but...
>'Oh, Plezzze!
>CW sucks, Elmer.   Even the US Coast Guard no longer requires it!  And for
>good reason...  CW is a dead, useless, outdated, archaic mode of
>communications.  Face it, CW is dead ~ finished.  I'd sooner use a jungle
>drum.
>Can you imagine how many  talented persons have been locked out of our ham
>radio fraternity because they couldn't learn the code?  Otherwise, these
>are very gifted engineers, technicians, programmers, non~technicals,  just
>plain folks from across the whole US;  citizens all.  All denied the ham
>radio privilege because they could not learn/retain the stupid code!  Even
>the feds finally woke-up to that.  ARRL did too, think of all the
>memberships they were missing out on?
>As a ham for twenty five years plus, I've used CW only once, really,  to
>upgrade to General because I was interested in 10 meters.  A important
>point is that I have never USED CW on ten or any other band with exception
>of 1 year as a Novice in high school!  I hated code then, I hate it now.
>The guys on two meters tested me over the air a few months back and I
>passed... That and a cup of coffee, I'd take the coffee.
>If there must be a requirement for code, it should be for those who WISH to
>qualify for the code spectrum(s) set aside within our ham bands now.  So
>how about a ham license with code endorsement?  What's wrong with that?
>Those purest cuckoo's who live for the  dah-de-dah's  can pound till the
>cows come home!
>We left our caves and spark-gaps behind, now it's time to burry CW.
>Hurumph!
>Tony Cardenas
>WA6IGJ,  WV6ZJE (1963~Novice)

Starts out just a touch rudely, but you do have some good points. I would
not share the opinion that code should vanish from the universe. My concern
had always been that it was a false measure of ability and seriousness. For
that matter, present testing does no better. I've taken all the writtens
just for the heck of it and passed. But no way could I learn the code or
ever even desire to do so. Some people do poorly with languages, and I
speak with experience having withstood the assualt of french and spanish
and CW classes unaffected!

There's a place in the hobby for all modes and sorts of operation. You seem
to be saying this as well. I'd like to see the code be an option for those
with an interest. I'd like that just as much as I'd like to see testing
reflect greater technical knowledge and proper operating practices. Now that'd
be an accomplishment!

Chris - N7RME
A "No-Code Thank You very Much" Technician, GROL+Radar sort, NARTE Cert'd,
Sr. Electronics Technician and repeater maintainer-fixer-upper occassional
Control Operator sort of guy.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:08 1996
From: Jeff Clark <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Late model FT-530 mods?
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 00:29:15 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hgboh$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Jeff Clark wrote:
>
> Robyn Lyn Lempicki (aka Gerry) wrote:
> >
> > Hi!  I just got a new FT-530.  According to the mod that I found while
> > searching the net, there is one solder pad (#13) to open up.  My radio loo
ks a
> > bit different inside...I had a green wire that was just begging to be cut,
 so
> > I did it!  It looks like that enabled airband rx.  Does anyone know how to
 get
> > 800-950mhz rx?  How abt extended tx? -Gerry
>
> Will knowlegable parties please post this info to the group or my email addr
ess.
>  I just bought one of the late model ft-530s as well and am interested in th
e
> extended tx mod.  It sure is different in there...

OK, I checked the boston amateur radio archives a second time & found the mod.
 for the late
model ft-530 at the bottom of the list.  I tried the mod & it worked great.  T
he site can be
found at:

http://ftp.barc.org:8080/pub/hamradio/mods/yaesu/

73
jeff, kf6bkg


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Barry Kabello)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Learn C/C++ programming on Win95
Date: 11 Mar 1996 02:40:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4i03qt$[e-mail]>

        Interested in learning C/C++ programming on Windows 95/NT, and extended DOS?
 Send an email to '[e-mail]', include line 'SEND PROG'


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mods/Comments for Yaesu FT-51R
Date: 3 Mar 1996 04:59:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4hb8vf$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2802962016480001@192.0.2.1> <4hb3r8$[e-mail]>

Rod Thompson <[e-mail]> writes:
>[e-mail] (Stephen Lui) wrote:
>>Does anyone who owns a FT-51R have any comments on the unit or the
>>programming software? Does the unit truly only receive to 470MHz? The
>>magic number for me is 471.1375MHz, the frequency of our local police,
>>which I like to monitor.
>The FT-51 can receive this frequency (471.1375MHz) but it requires a
>hardware mod or
>useing the ADMS-1 software.  The default setting for the software is
>the same as the
>radio.  That is, to program frequency outside of the normal operating
>range you have
>to change a setting in the WIN.ini under the section FT-51 Programmer.
>This will
>allow you to program ANY frequency from 60 to 999MHz.  The radio will
>only receive
>from 100-180 and 375-525 MHz.  Transmit frequency range is not controllable
>by
>software, it does require a hardware mod.
>>Does anyone know of any mods for the FT-51R (preferably keyboard) to
>>extend the RX range? The unit is so small that I would think any hardware
>>mods would be difficult.
>>Stephen
>>(Iching to buy an HT, as soon as I can decide which one!)
>If you have any questions you can call me at 1-205-880-3093 10am to 6pm CST

Hi: I also own and like very much the FT-51R. Bought mine over a year ago
and use it daily. There is now an alternative to Yaesu's ADMS-1 package
called EZ-Clone. I just ordered it so I can't give you a review yet. However,
I did receice the following message from the company on this very question.
Also, I'm not connected to this company in any way, just passing along what
I've been told so far.

Chris - N7RME

-----begin attached message-----
From [e-mail] Sat Mar  2 18:26 MST 1996
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 18:25:38 -0700
From: dave sims <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R

Hi again Chris, yes, EZ Clone will program the FT-51R with frequencies
from 000.000 to 999.999 MHz, including 471.1375.  The radio will
display that frequency on its display, and we've even got the radio to
receive signals at 471.1375.  Of course, I doubt this would work at
800 MHz :^)

cheers,
dave
--
dave sims
[e-mail]
kc5jkn
http://www.acsys.com -- software for programming amateur radios
-----end attached message-----


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Monninger)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola HF gear?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 18:29:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hetck$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]> Dave Dredge <[e-mail]> writes:

>It seems to me the R-390 was made by Collins.

The 390 was made by several companies, Collins and Motorola among them...I
don't remember the others but there were two or three others.

Mark   AA7TA


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Borzelleri)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MT1000 programming
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 01:13:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4htaqa$[e-mail]>
References: <4hi3lp$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Harrison Cooper) wrote:

>Anyone ever built the programming interface for
>a Motorola MT1000 ?  The owner has the software
>for this, but I am not sure what it really takes
>to reprogram this unit.

>Please email to [e-mail]

>--
>| Harrison Cooper                    | email : [e-mail]             |
>| Hardware Design                    | Phone : [phone]               |
>| Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.  | Radio : N7KST  147.04 R,           |
>| Salt Lake City, Utah  84158        | 1G617   Davis County ARES 147.42 S |
        You  need the RIB box & programming cable. Call AIR Comm @
602-275-4505 they can help you.
Steve Borzelleri
Sutter Buttes 2-Way
P.O. Box 3419.
Yuba City, CA 95992
916.674.7532
Fax [phone]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:13 1996
From: Jim Daneke <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Mods for IC2000H
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 13:09:00 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hilkj$[e-mail]>

Anyone know of any?


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need suggestion on 2 meter all mode mobile
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 6 Mar 96 11:19:25 EST
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Anthony J. M
onteiro X-6315) writes:
> Yaesu currently makes the FT-290R-II which comes with a "snap-on" 25 Watt
> amplifier for mobile or fixed station use (when not using the battery pack)
> This unit is still in production and is probably the cheapest all-mode
> 2m rig available.

This is a pretty neat little radio. I own one. I've taken it hiking on
the Appalachian Trail with me, and use it for Packet/FM/SSB at home.
It does it all pretty well, but not great.
It's strong signal handling is not the greatest. It's tough using it in a
contest, at least here in EPA. I would think the phase noise is up there too.
I did work 20 grids in the Jan VHF SS with it, an old 13el F9FT yagi,
and occasionally a 160W mirage amp.

73,
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (destiny admin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Subject: New Radio Program
Date: 7 Mar 1996 00:38:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlb5c$[e-mail]>

Destiny Software is a developer of video games like JAM! (shareware),
Darkseed II and Blood Bowl.  You can check out our WEB site at:

http://www.destiny-software.com/destiny

Now we're experimenting with RADIO!

We have just successfully broadcast good quality music and speech over
the internet (receiving with a 28 800 modem).  (Our compression
algorithm is much faster and better quality than others we've tried.)
We plan to allow non-commercial users to broadcast for free,
encouraging a wide variety of viewpoints in this new medium.
Commercial users are welcome to participate in BETA testing.

The compression is in real time on a 486, so we will support live
broadcasts as soon as we finish the initial testing.

So here's the scoop - we're looking for BETA testers.  If you would
like to become a broadcaster, you need:

1. A permanent IP address.
2. A dedicated machine (or permission to run background tasks)
3. You are either linked to the MBONE or you have a fast connection
4. If you are using a non-windows server, we may need access to your
account to compile for your particular machine.

Basically, you fill your hard drive with samples and a script file to
organize playback.  (The player will repeat the script when it
finishes).  Later we will upgrade so that broadcasters can go live by
plugging a signal into a PC sound card.

Listeners will enter your address into the radio program and voila,
your broadcast will begin playing.  The radio feature will be built
into our soon to be released freeware browser.

If you're interested, send email.

Thanks!








From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (William Berris)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: opinions requested on Icom IC-Z1A and Yaesu FT-51R
Date: 8 Mar 1996 04:41:18 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4hodpe$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

>>I would recomend either the IC-W31A or the Yaesu FT-51R, as I have
experience with >>both. I am presently using the IC-W31A and thinking of
another FT-51R/HP for a
>>second Dual Band HT.

PMFJI, but if you were to make a choice, which would you prefer?  I am
considering a dual-band HT, and those are two of the models I am
considering, along with units like the TH-79A(D)-HP

I actually haven't gotten my ticket yet (test next week), but am doing
some shopping early.

Thanks,
Bill

(____{@}_________]]]]
    [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:17 1996
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 15:19:00 -0500
From: [e-mail] (David Edger)
Subject: Re: opinions requested on Icom IC-Z1A and^C
Message-ID: <NOMSGID_1=3A109=[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

     Everyone has an opinion, but for my two cents worth, the best dual
band HT I've ever used is the FT51R.  I bought Icoms for twenty years,
really liked them, but was so impressed with the FT51R that I switched.
It has great battery pack options, a built in voltage meter so you're
never surprised by a dead battery, a scope to check activity on nearby
freqs, and will receive out of band without a modification.
     I won't part with mine, but am planning to sell my Kenwood TH79a
which lacks the sensitivity and wideband receive of the Yaesu.
      73 , Dave AA5NU


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Packet Radio DX/CLUSTER
Date: 8 Mar 1996 09:52:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4hphj7$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)

Hello,
  I know this has nothing to do with equipment but, I thought people out
there
  would like know that there is a DX/CLUSTER node on 145.750 located in
IL.
  So, if you are interested in DXING and would like to get on
then..connect to     N9MXT on 145.750 and enjoy chasing all the DX/SPOTS
you hear and send to   help others!

                                     Hope to see you there...   N9MXT -
Jeffrey



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex , W&W Assoc.
Date: 8 Mar 1996 22:22:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>,<[e-mail]>,<[e-mail]> <4hnsq1$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Steve Dworkin <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>> I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
>> other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
>> with W&W Associates.
>>
>> How are their batteries?
>> Case quality and fit?
>> Life expectancy?
>> Nicad memory?
>> What about their Master Charger I that uses "delta negative voltage
>> detection" with the custom charging "cups"?
>> Does it work OK?
>> Does this charging method help improve the life of the battery?
>> What about the quality of the cups and chargers themselves?
>>
>> Info on any other suppliers?
>>
>> I'm sure that most of us will be very interested in these postings.
>>
>> Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC
>
>Alan:
>
>I'm starting to think they are all the same.  I have a W&W battery
>that I dropped off with them last week with the request that the
>tech look at it and tell me what I was doing wrong that caused the
>premature death of the battery pack.  They never called.  A week
>later I called and was told that they left a message (first problem)
>and that the answer was "Its over 2 years old and not under warranty."
>I proceeded to explain that I wasn't looking for anything for free,
>but rather some info so that I could buy another and not do the
>same thing.  Answer: "Its not under warranty."
>
>I followed up with a request that they split the case (so that
>I could replace the bad cells).  They said "We can't do that."
>
>Needless to say... My expereince is no better than the gent that
>spoke about Periphex.  So be it.
>
>Steve Dworkin, N2MDQ
>[e-mail]



Steve & Alan,
I have used both Periphex and W&W batteries. I prefer W&W because of
their better selection of high quality packs, also higher capacity.
You get good and bad with ALL vendors. I personally have had no
problems with either of the above.
Another battery vendor worth checking is Alexander Batteries. You will
see their adds in CQ and QST.

73
Bill (N0EVG)


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:21 1996
From: Steve Dworkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex , W&W Assoc.
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 23:51:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4hnsq1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>,<[e-mail]>,<[e-mail]>


> I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
> other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
> with W&W Associates.
>
> How are their batteries?
> Case quality and fit?
> Life expectancy?
> Nicad memory?
> What about their Master Charger I that uses "delta negative voltage
> detection" with the custom charging "cups"?
> Does it work OK?
> Does this charging method help improve the life of the battery?
> What about the quality of the cups and chargers themselves?
>
> Info on any other suppliers?
>
> I'm sure that most of us will be very interested in these postings.
>
> Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC

Alan:

I'm starting to think they are all the same.  I have a W&W battery
that I dropped off with them last week with the request that the
tech look at it and tell me what I was doing wrong that caused the
premature death of the battery pack.  They never called.  A week
later I called and was told that they left a message (first problem)
and that the answer was "Its over 2 years old and not under warranty."
I proceeded to explain that I wasn't looking for anything for free,
but rather some info so that I could buy another and not do the
same thing.  Answer: "Its not under warranty."

I followed up with a request that they split the case (so that
I could replace the bad cells).  They said "We can't do that."

Needless to say... My expereince is no better than the gent that
spoke about Periphex.  So be it.

Steve Dworkin, N2MDQ
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (L0phT POCSAG Project)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: POCSAG Decoder
Date: 6 Mar 1996 05:04:25 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>



L0pht Heavy Industries has designed and may produce a pager 'interceptor' /
POCSAG decoder. The device is powered off the serial port and fits inside a
DB25 hood (it is 1.1" sq.)  It is possible to monitor pager data transmissions
at 512/1200/2400bps and will decode both numeric and alphanumeric messages. Th
e
device is used with a radio scanner (not included) and PC software.

We are trying to determine the current market interest for such a device. If
you would possibly be interested in purchasing this item, please send us an
e-mail ([e-mail]) letting us know if you would want it available in
schematic/kit form or as a fully-assembled unit, and the approximate market
value of this product.

Thanks.

L0pht Heavy Industries POCSAG Project
[e-mail]

----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.l0pht.com                            [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:23 1996
From: Svein Henriksen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: QRO design with 4-1000
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 19:02:14 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Are there anyone out there with a good design for an amplifier using the
4-1000. I have one but have little practical experience in
amplifier desing work although I am an electronics engineer.

Any help would be apreciated.

73 de Svein
E-mail : [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Myers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack TRC-512 to 6M?
Date: 8 Mar 1996 07:32:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4honr2$[e-mail]>
References: <4hn6eq$[e-mail]>

In article <4hn6eq$[e-mail]>,
Rob Neff <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Hello all.
>I just picked up a RS TRC-512 49Mhz 5 Channel radio. I wanted to see
>if I could get it to  go up on 6 M. Well, I was impressed with what I
>was inside the rig. Dual conversion 10.7/455Khz, and PLL controlled.
>I have played around with the BCD setting of the PLL but can only get
>it to go to 49.970.
>Someone mentioned to me about force feeding another osc into the PLL
>to move it up to 52.525 but he didn't elaborate much on it.
>
>The PLL is an MC145166P, 10.24 ref .

The 145166 is a dual PLL intended for cordless telephone operation.
The 4 bit input is only valid for values 1..10; other values select
channel 10.  This is the table of channels from the data sheet:

Channel Frequency
1       49.67
2       49.845
3       49.860
4       49.77
5       49.875
6       49.83
7       49.89
8       49.93
9       49.99
10      49.97

I suspect the RS design ties the LSB low, resulting in a selection
of only the odd # channels (which explains why you see 49.97 and
not 49.99).

If I'm correct, the 10.24MHz reference is also used as injection to
the second mixer, the first IF is actually 10.695MHz (confirmed by
the MC145166 data sheet).  If you try shifting the radio by changing
the reference rock, you'll move the first IF outside the passband
of the ceramic filter, though it may still seem to work OK for strong
signals.

>If anyone has any sugguestions or ideas, I would greatly appreciate
>your responce.

You *might* be able to build external offset oscillators to move the
PLL from 49.xx to 52.5, but the frequency difference would be small,
and I suspect you'd have a real problem adequate suppression of the
offset "image", which would either cause the PLL to unlock or
somtimes jump to a frequency something like 47.5MHz (ugh!).

The only really practical choice is to replace the MC145166 with the
more general MC145162, which isn't pin-pin identical but is
functionally the same, with the exception that frequency selection
is done via a serial bit stream, and you'd also need a little
CPU (like a PIC) and maybe a keypad and display.

>There is no real reason for moving the rig to 6M, except that the
>package is small, and would be a great remote for a link (not for
>control of course). Plus, would be great for fests and field days.
>FM QRP? (GRIN)

The rockbound radios are more practical - they need new rocks and
a re-tune as far as I can tell.

--
 * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are      *
 * [phone]               | mine and do not necessarily   *
 * [e-mail]      | reflect those of my employer  *


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:25 1996
From: Bill Crocker <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack TRC-512 to 6M?
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 01:07:15 -0300
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hn6eq$[e-mail]>

Rob Neff wrote:
>
> Hello all.
> I just picked up a RS TRC-512 49Mhz 5 Channel radio. I wanted to see
> if I could get it to  go up on 6 M. Well, I was impressed with what I
> was inside the rig. Dual conversion 10.7/455Khz, and PLL controlled.
> I have played around with the BCD setting of the PLL but can only get
> it to go to 49.970.

Rob:

I remember reading an article about doing just that with an earlier model of
the single channel unit.  It was in one of the shortwave/HAM magazines...about
ten years ago.

I realize this isn't much help, except maybe to keep you motivated!  :)
Possibly someone else will recall the article, or has done it themselves.

Good luck, Bill Crocker


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (James Woodard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Sale - HF Tribander Beam
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 03:58:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4hg776$[e-mail]>

I have a Hy-Gain Model TH3JR-S Tribander (10-15-20 meters) beam for
sale.  It is currently up (somewhat easy to take down) and in great
shape, but I just do not use it.  I have been very inactive and I
think someone else could use it.

It's just 21 lbs and the longest element is 27'3", but it has a
forward gain of up to 8 dbi.  Great medium duty antenna, and I want
just $150 for it, and you come get it.

I am in Arlington, Texas.  Email address is [e-mail]
Email me if interested, and I will return with my phone number and we
can talk.

Price is cheap...and firm!   Thanks.   Jim Woodard   -  WG5S



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:27 1996
From: Roland S Geter PhD <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Sale - HF Tribander Beam
Date: 6 Mar 1996 22:24:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4hl3b7$[e-mail]>
References: <4hg776$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

How long is the boom?  I hope this antenna is not larger than the
TA-33JR.
Roland



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (TLifland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SELL ALL MODE 430-45-MHZ 500 WATT RF AMPLIFIER
Date: 9 Mar 1996 18:11:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4ht36c$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TLifland)

SELL:  ALL MODE (AM/FM/SSB) 430-450MHZ TABLE TOP (OR RACK MOUNT) HIGH
POWER (500 WATT) R.F. AMPLIFIER USES TWO 4CX250K'S IN FINAL. BUILT IN
115/230 AC POWER SUPPLY.  WEIGHS APPX. 95 LBS. PICK-UP OR YOU ARRANGE AND
PAY FOR SHIPPING.  $390.

TOM - W2RFU


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:29 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 01:51:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4hj5la$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]>

In article <4hfdc0$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (andy) wrote:
>Has anyone found one of those little mini screw-on connectors/adapters
>for the C508A antenna jack? Might be nice to try an external antenna
>sometime, but I've never seen a connector quite like this one.
>
>BTW...are you as impressed with this unit as I am? The aircraft receive
>is the best I've ever heard; it even beats the reception on Standard's
>own C288A. Batteries seem to last forever, and it's just not that hard to
>get into a repeater with 280 mw. Would have just preferred a normal BNC
>antenna connector, though...
>
>-andy, k4adl
>

The connector on the Standard C508A is an SMA connector.  Any good electronic
parts house should have an SMA to BNC adapter.

Also, The antenna supplied with the 508A is fairly narrow around 2 meters
(good for IMD rejection). I carry an antenna from a C108 and use this whenever

I want to listen to aircraft or weather (162.559 MHz). Reception is much
better.

Enjoy,
Robert Wright,
KG7YE in Beaverton, Oregon


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robyn Lyn Lempicki)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: STANDARD C508A: External Antenna?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 00:05:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4hl997$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfdc0$[e-mail]> <4hht71$[e-mail]>

Manny Tau, Psy.D. ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I believe that Comet makes an aftermarket antenna for the 508a
: utilizing this SMA connector.  It's a little bigger than the stock,
: and I saw it at HRO.

The Comet SMA3 antenna is a MUST for the 508A!!!  Buy one, you will not be
disappointed.  I love my 508, and the antenna is a major bonus.  The only time
I use the original is for work within 1/4-1/2 mile.  There are times I will
not even hear a station with the stock ant, the Comet will be receive almost
s9!!!    -Gerry


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert J. Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Super Skyrider Toobs
Date: 5 Mar 96 10:42:26 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960305054022.23716A-100000@DGS>
References: <[e-mail]>


Dave Ragsdale asks if the H6 tube in his Super Skyrider could be
performing a task similar to a 6J5.  No No No.  The 6J5 is a single
triode, the 6H6 is a twin diode.

73 de Bob  w3otc



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (James W Beckett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Swap Drakes?  1824-R8A
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 04:46:47 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Have Drake 1824 TVRO system- Orbitron SX10, C and Ku, nifty 5.5'
ground mount. No VCII.  Want Drake R8A.  Antenna must be picked up.
All manuals, remotes, original "box".
Jim

KD2KU
Corning, NY




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:32 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: test-ignore
Date: 6 Mar 1996 03:21:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4hj0bc$[e-mail]>




From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trade wide band receiver for dualband handheld.
Date: 9 Mar 1996 15:30:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4hs86l$[e-mail]>

Trade a ICOM IC-R1 wide-band multimode transceiver for a Dual
band handheld transceiver. The ICOM R1 covers 100 kHz to 1300 MHz,
selectable tuning steps from 500 Hz to 50 kHz, AM/FM/Wide-FM modes,
and built in 24 hour clock all in a palm size receiver. Smallest
wide-band receiver made and comes with lots of bells and wistles.
Uses some of the same technology/features as in the ICOM R7000
like auto memory write on search, five scanning types, and
frequency skip functions.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Trade wide band receiver for dualband handheld.
Date: 9 Mar 1996 15:57:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4hs9q3$[e-mail]>
References: <4hs86l$[e-mail]>


The ICOM IC-R1 is a Receiver not a Transceiver.

Carl Hodder ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Trade a ICOM IC-R1 wide-band multimode transceiver for a Dual
: band handheld transceiver. The ICOM R1 covers 100 kHz to 1300 MHz,
: selectable tuning steps from 500 Hz to 50 kHz, AM/FM/Wide-FM modes,
: and built in 24 hour clock all in a palm size receiver. Smallest
: wide-band receiver made and comes with lots of bells and wistles.
: Uses some of the same technology/features as in the ICOM R7000
: like auto memory write on search, five scanning types, and
: frequency skip functions.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Matt C. Brinkhoff)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TT 6M Xverter Question
Date: 7 Mar 1996 01:40:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4hleqi$[e-mail]>

Has anyone built/purchased the Tentec 6M transverter kit?  I'm curious how
much power in the model with the 2M IF will take in...  The ads say
something like 5 watts in, but I'd like to use it with the 2M module on my
767gx - it puts out something around 10 watts.

Thanks.

--
Matt C. Brinkhoff, KB0RXC
[e-mail]
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/mbrinkho
Lincoln, Nebraska [EN10]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:35 1996
From: Michael J Wooding <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: VHF Communications Magazine
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 18:46:13 +0000
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi Folks,

For subscribers and interested parties:

Issue 1/1996 of VHF Communications is now at the printers and should be
shipped by March 30th.

For more information on the contents of this issue and on subscribing to
the magazine take a look at our Web site:

http://www.eolas.co.uk/ag/vhfcomm.htm

Thanks and 73 ... Mike

Michael J Wooding   [e-mail] - CompuServe: 100441,377
Web Pages: http://www.eolas.co.uk/ag/vhfcomm.htm (hambits.htm & hamclip.htm)
Tel: [phone]   Fax: [phone]
KM Publications, 5 Ware Orchard, Barby, Nr.Rugby, CV23 8UF, UK
VHF Communications Magazine - Especially Covering VHF, UHF and Microwaves


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:36 1996
From: JA Glasscock <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Want 2 meter Transever
Date: 6 Mar 1996 14:54:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4hk8uk$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Does Any body want to sell their 2 meter Transever? Just email me at <a
Href="mailto:[e-mail]">[e-mail], With "Vance Transever"
in the subject line.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:38 1996
From: Clive Maby <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted : Windows Logging Software info
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:23:14 +0000
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi, I am looking for some Windows based logging software to replace my
current DOS based setup.  I have looked through CQ magazine but am
unable to find much.  I am using a Kantronics KAM & a TS870 both of
which I need to control.

Can anyone recommend any packages to me?

--
Clive Maby - G4NAQ
Principal Software Engineer
Sun Life Assurance, Bristol, UK


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:39 1996
From: Stephen Farlow <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Iambic Paddle - Used - Good Condition
Date: 6 Mar 1996 13:10:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4hk2s9$[e-mail]>

I am looking for an iambic paddle in good condition such as a Bencher. I don't
want to pay the $80 or $90 for a new one. After getting my Advanced license 2
years
ago, I pretty much gave up on getting my CW speed and proficiency up and the h
ope
of EVER getting to 20 wpm to get Extra. Well, my flame has been relit to get m
y
code speed up and become proficient so I can get Extra. I purchased the Code Q
uick
program to relearn the code and it is helping TREMENDOUSLY!!!
Problem is, I have no way to enagage in a CW QSO. I have a nice IC-738 with a
built-in keyer and no key (I once had one but dols it). I can't use a straight
 key
due to having had Carpal Tunnel surgery on both hands and a fear of aggravatin
g
my wrists again. I have used and LOVE to use an iambic paddle.
Can anyone help me out here?
Please email reply to:  [e-mail] and/or [e-mail]

73, de KJ5YN



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:40 1996
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: What happened to Patcom?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 11:47:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4hmicb$[e-mail]>

Hello,

On behalf of a friend I am asking about the Patcom transceiver. He
had his  PC1610 sent back to the manufacturer to have it upgraded to a
PC16000. However, there was no response and they seem to have stopped
advertizing.

73, Moritz DL5UH



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 07:22:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Terry Burge)
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 22:17:09 -0800
Message-ID: <4hgm95$[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>

In article <4h7j7n$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (D. R
agsdale) writes:
>I've had this old Hallicrafters receiver for about 20 years; I've used
>it a lot for shortwave listening - it's still a great receiver - I'm
>just wondering when it was made and if it has any collector value or if
>it's just a neat old radio.  Description:
>Very large, rack mount, facepiece is 9 inches high by 19 inches wide.
>No cabinet, don't know if it ever had one.
>No model number I can find, but says "Super Skyrider" on the tuning
>dial.  The tuning dial is a 5 inch diameter metal (aluminum?) disk
>sitting out in front of the facepiece, with freqs. etched in it -
>Radio tunes from 550 KHz to 61 MHz in 6 bands (61 MHZ?  why?)
????
>Has standard meter and controls, including crystal phasing, pitch
>control, bfo, etc.
>Knobs appear to be black bakelite.

On the SX-28 the tuning knobs appear like spoked wheels. Looks like
there are 12 knobs, 3 on left, 3 on right side, 3 across the middle
with the switch in the middle bottom, and the two tuning knobs.


This is what I find in the book by Raymond Moore, Communications
Receivers.

Model: SX-28 Super Skyrider YRS: 1940-43, price $159.50, Bands:6,
.54-43 Mhz, IF 455 KC, Filter: Crystal, Tubes: 15, 6AB7, RF1, 6SK7,
IF2, 6SA7 mix, 6SA7 hfo, 6L7 IF1/NL, 6SK7 IF2, 6B8 det/meter amp,
6B8 avc amp, 6AB7 noise amp, 6H6 noise rect, 6J5 bfo, 6SC7 af1,
2 6V6 push pull af out, 5Z3 rect. Over 50,000 built, includes A model.

Model SX-28A, Super Skyrider YRS; 1944-46, price $223. Same as SX-28
except added permeability tuned, higher Q inductors in front end.
Inductors and trimmers for each band were mounted on small, indiv
chassies for easy removal.

Model SX-28FCC special, manf for FCC, differences no know.

Terry



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:54:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paul)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: (none)
Date: 11 Mar 96 10:05:04 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

subscribe



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:54:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-242?
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:50:02 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ha3ve$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (JRW) wrote:

>Anybody know anything about the HTX-242?
>
>-JRW4
There is an HTX-202 but no HTX-242.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:54:57 1996
From: lcarpent@freenet (Lennard Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info on Rat Shack Comp 100 Scanner
Date: 7 Mar 1996 01:39:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlepb$[e-mail]>

  Need programming info or manual for the above scanner
Thanks



--

         //               Amiga Corporation!
        //              The Buttheads Blew IT!
    \\ //                    Len Carpenter
     \X/            ( [e-mail] )
                 A Believer in Welland, Ontario Canada






From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:54:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Parf)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Intermod Probs
Date: 6 Mar 1996 22:24:41 -0500
Message-ID: <4hlktp$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Parf)

Hi Scott,
Our company, Par Electronics designs, mfg, and markets a patent pending
notch filter for 2M and 70cM. Unlike all other designs, ours can be left
in line on dual band rigs. Insertion loss in the 2M band is .24-.50 dB w/
an atendant VSWR of 1.2:1 or less. Loss @70cM is 0.25dB. The filters were
reviewed in JAN95 CQ Magazine. Also appeared under New Products in Sept 95
QST. Gordon West will be reviewing them in an upcoming issue of the new CQ
VHF.  The filters are small (2"X2.5"X1") and come standard w/ UHF
connectors but BNC or N can be ordered.  I would guess that 2-5% of the
600+ we have in the field went on Kenwood 733's- a nice feature rich radio
but probably the worst front end of any recent rig. E-Mail me your
snail-mail and I will send you our brochure along w/ HP network analyzer
curves of the filters.  73,  Dale WA2YPY


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:54:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (N3RQT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood SW-100 SWR meter instructions
Date: 7 Mar 1996 03:51:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlmgo$[e-mail]>

I have a Kenwood SW-100 SWR/Power Meter but don't know how to use it.
Any help is appreciated.

There are only two controls.  A slide switch to select POWER, SWR, or VOLT
and apot with an off switch labeled "CALIB".

Thanks.


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: opinions requested on Icom IC-Z1A and Yaesu FT-51R
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:45:02 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

art timmers <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I am narrowing down my list of 2M handheld radios that I want to buy -- I wou
ldn't mind having some opinions
>on either one of the two radios in the subject of the posting.  Pros or cons
on either one of them.  I kind
>of like the removable control panel on the Icom, but other than that, am prob
ably just going to flip a coin,
>if I don't get any negative comments on either one.
>
>Thanks for any information given.
>
>John Timmers VE7 JBT (just got that ID today, BTW; I wrote and [quite obvious
ly] passed my basic
>qualification two weeks ago :-) [gotta' reward myself with a new radio ;-)

John,
Try the Icom W31A instead of the Z1A. It's easier toe program and has
very much better RX audio than the Z1A. I would recomend either the
IC-W31A or the Yaesu FT-51R, as I have experience with both. I am
presently using the IC-W31A and thinking of another FT-51R/HP for a
second Dual Band HT. I don't think you would go wrong with either one.
73's
Bill (N0EVG)


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:01 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Q: A Good "starter" 2M Rig....
Date: 11 Mar 1996 02:24:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4i02t5$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Can anyone recommend a good 2 meter rig for a new Tech?

I would like to set up a rig in a college dorm room to hit the local
repeaters around the area but I really do not know where to start.

Radio? (Sml, suitable) antenna?

Any help would be greatly appreciated...

Thanks.

- Bill
  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Q: A Good "starter" 2M Rig....
Date: 11 Mar 1996 15:00:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1f5i$[e-mail]>
References: <4i02t5$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] wrote:
: Can anyone recommend a good 2 meter rig for a new Tech?
:
: I would like to set up a rig in a college dorm room to hit the local
: repeaters around the area but I really do not know where to start.
:
: Radio? (Sml, suitable) antenna?
:
: Any help would be greatly appreciated...
:
: Thanks.
:
: - Bill
:   [e-mail]
I once had a Radio Shack HTX-202 with a Twin-Lead "J pole" antenna in my
apartment. It worked quite well. The antenna is easy to make, and the ht
it tough, and inexpensive.

Nate.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: So.Cal. Hams Use 445.3MHz Repeater...
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:32:03 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h34ho$[e-mail]> <4hf4s9$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Bill Soon) wrote:

>Tony:
>
>OK -- which is it??? 445.5 or 445.3 ???
>(I know but others reading your post may not !!!)
>
>Bill -- KF6ZO
>
>[e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas) wrote:
>
>>Fellow Hams:
>
>>When in Los Angeles, licensed Hams are invited to use:
>
>>445.5MHz  (down 5 MHz) with a PL of 100Hz.
>
>>The Repeater is located on top of Palos Verdes and 'see's 98% of the LA
>>Basin and has a range of about 120 miles.  The System is listed as
>>"Private", however, I wish to extend a welcome to 'Guests'.  There are no
>>dues or fees.
>
>>Guests are requested to obey FCC rules and observe the Golden Rule.  It's
>>that simple.
>
>>Enjoy the Repeater!
>
>>Tony Cardenas
>>WA6IGJ
>
>
>[e-mail]     http://www.primenet.com/~wsoon/
>

Tony,
It's nice to see that some repeaters still try to abide by FCC rules
and the Golden rule. I'm from western Colorado where most hams abide
by the same, but while I've been in Phoenix the last month, I've heard
so many conversations on the 146.940 repeater that I would not even
discuss over a cordless phone, let alone an OPEN repeater, that I am
very disapointed with some of our ham brotheren. They sounded as bad
as CB'ers. I have been a ham for along time, testing for novice, then
Tech at the FCC because there were no VE's then. I'm on my third
license and my second call, and it seems that common courtesy on 2m
and UHF repeaters has gone down hill greatly. Hang in there.
73's
Bill (N0EVG)


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Thief-proofing
Date: 11 Mar 1996 14:25:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1d5m$[e-mail]>
References: <4h1cen$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Mark Pettigrew <[e-mail]> writes:
>Two questions -
>(a) does anyone know of any good theft-proofing methods for radio
>equipment (apart from the obvious things like buckets of sulphuric acid
>(b) why don't the manufacturers put a loop for a padlock mount onto the
>chassis of new transceivers? This is done for some laptop computers, and
>I know that nothing is going to deter a dedicate burglar with plenty of
>time, but since many burglaries are in-out operations taking only a few
>minutes, anything that slows the thieves down would, IMHO, reduce the
>chance of my losing a transceiver.
>Cheers
>Mark
>G0WLR

Hi: I worked briefly at a government facility that was a high security
establishment with armed guards wandering the halls constantly, randomly
stopping people to check ID cards. Even with that, there was a team that
did nothing but go around and secure computers and printers to desks, walls
and floors. There's quite an array of kits and gadgets for this purpose.
Picking up some computer mail-order catalogs might work in spotting
a lock-down kit that would work on your radio(s).

ICOM, quite unintentionally I imagine, supplied the heat-sink on the
IC-228H with a cross-bar on one end. After mine was stolen and replaced on
insurance, I made up a shackle which dropped between the heat sink fins
and was attached by pad lock and chain to the steering column.

It'd be down-right nifty if manufacturers would equip radios with a means
of locking them down. Some computer makers design in a place in the frame
where a shackle can be installed from insdie the radio, thru the frame
and the case. There are also kits for some computers which involve
putting a heavy metal frame around it in two halves, the lock securing
the halves. Perhaps this approach would work for some amateur radios?

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:05 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,uk.radio.amateur
From: [e-mail] (David Stockton)
Subject: Re: Thief-proofing
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:17:25 GMT
References: <[e-mail]>

Mark Pettigrew ([e-mail]) wrote:

: (a) does anyone know of any good theft-proofing methods for radio
: equipment (apart from the obvious things like buckets of sulphuric acid
: which are both dangerous and illegal)? Are there any good ways to
: camouflage kit so that burglars walk past it in their search for sellable
: goods like VCRs? And how do you fix a plastic-pad-and-cable type security
: device on a tranceiver where every panel can be removed or has loads of
: sockets or switches all over the surface?


    I understand that the majority of burglaries are committed by people
with no idea what anything is, and even if you disguised your DSP HF
flagship rig as a beaten-up CB, many would nick it as a CB. The computer
thieves seem to be specialists with some knowledge, though.


: (b) why don't the manufacturers put a loop for a padlock mount onto the
: chassis of new transceivers? This is done for some laptop computers, and
: would make it a bit easier to secure the kit to something solid.


   You'd still have the rig, but they'd have pulled so hard that the back
panel would be pulled out in a tent around the loop, with the spot welds
on the internal chassis deck broken, then the whole thing dropped on the
floor (probably landed on front panel)   OK, satisfaction that they didn't
get it, but still very distressing.


: I know that nothing is going to deter a dedicate burglar with plenty of
: time, but since many burglaries are in-out operations taking only a few
: minutes, anything that slows the thieves down would, IMHO, reduce the
: chance of my losing a transceiver.

   In-out merchants with little time, but also no worry about damaging
things, and no knowledge about what anything is...

   Sorry,
          David GM4ZNX




   Hey, how about car radio type code protection of VCRs, hifi gear etc
operated by tilt-switch ?  If you move it, you have to put code in before
it'll work again.   Might just bring down the net profitability of the
theft trade if enough units had it....


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:06 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Trade 5ht for 2ht
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:53:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4haedm$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Lewis Bullard) wrote:

>I have three standard hx 400U ht's, 1 standard hx340 ht,
>and 1 erricson/ge ht. I would like to trade for two
>motorola ht's. Interested?

What kind of shape is the HX-340 in and is it a VHF unit with
touch-tone pad and LCD channel readout?
Bill e-mail add is: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Parf)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TT 6M Xverter Question
Date: 6 Mar 1996 22:31:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4hll9s$[e-mail]>
References: <4hleqi$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Parf)

The TT can use built in T pads to absorb more power if the rig runs 10 or
so. I've heard a number on the air and they sound fabulous. They do
however use a 20M IF which is unusual but avoids more complex output
filtering to get rid of spurs.
73,  Dale WA2YPY


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Weir)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted - Kenwood 221/231
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 04:33:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlos0$[e-mail]>


I'm looking for a used 221/231 that is in good condition, normal wear
and tear considered on a rig this old.  No brain dead or "there's just
a broken wire" rigs please.

Jim


Jim Weir VP Engineering | You bet your sweet patootie I speak for the
RST Engineering         | company.  I OWN the cotton-pickin' company.
Grass Valley CA 95945   |
http://www.rst-engr.com | AR Adv WB6BHI--FCC 1/C phone--Cessna 182A N73CQ
[e-mail]        | Commercial/CFI-Airplane/Glider-----A&P Mechanic



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay B)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Wanted! Dual band HT
Date: 9 Mar 1996 20:50:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4htch0$[e-mail]>
References: <4ht9ro$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay B)

beats a battery in the mic


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:10 1996
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Henry van Cleef)
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 01:28:37 GMT

In article <4h7j7n$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (D. R
agsdale) writes:
>I've had this old Hallicrafters receiver for about 20 years; I've used
>it a lot for shortwave listening - it's still a great receiver - I'm
>just wondering when it was made and if it has any collector value or if
>it's just a neat old radio.  Description:
>
>No model number I can find, but says "Super Skyrider" on the tuning
>dial.  The tuning dial is a 5 inch diameter metal (aluminum?) disk
>sitting out in front of the facepiece, with freqs. etched in it -
>
>Radio tunes from 550 KHz to 61 MHz in 6 bands (61 MHZ?  why?)
>
The set you are describing matches the descriptions of the SX-16 and
SX-17 in Moore "Communications Receivers."  They were built 1937-39 and
were replaced in 1940 by the SX-28A.

According to Moore, the SX-16 and 17 are identical except that the 17
has two RF amplifiers (2 6K7's) and a noise limiter (6J5 used), with a
noise limiter switch on the front panel.  They were built without the
crystal filter as well, as S-16 and S-17.  Moore also lists an SX17F
"probably built for the FAA."  SX-16 has 11 tubes, SX-17 has 13, SX-17F
has 12.



--
===================================================================
Hank van Cleef                                The Union Institute
        E-mail [e-mail] or [e-mail]
===================================================================



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (Padgett 0sirius)
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:22:42
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]> <4hgm95$[e-mail]>

>Radio tunes from 550 KHz to 61 MHz in 6 bands (61 MHZ?  why?)

Would suspect that this would make it 1935-36 since 45-50 Mc was allocated
to experimental FM by 1938-39. Do not know why but it seemed that all the
radio manufacturers went nuts about ranges that year with 60 Mc being "
required".

Zenith Strat. & Philco "Majestic" (or was it "Philharmonic" ? 30 tubes
anyway) also went through the roof in tuning. Fact that little or nothing
was up there at the moment did not seem to bother anyone like a speedometer
on a 6 cyl that goes to 160 (won't mention the problem of getting anything
to work that high either).

Soon thereafter, all dropped the all-wave requirement to c.a. 40 Mhz so put
it down to the marketeers.

                        A. Padgett Peterson, P.E.
                        Cybernetic Psychophysicist
                   Totally Obsessed with TransOceanics
                      My other car is a Pontiac too
                           We also walk dogs
                       PGP 2.7 Public Key Available


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:13 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: [e-mail] (Richard Crisp)
Subject: Re: When does the Foothill College Swap in Los Altos, CA, start?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4gd2lf$[e-mail]> <4h5ulh$[e-mail]> <4h63tj$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 17:19:48 GMT

what is the talk-in freq?

--
Richard Crisp                 Cupertino, Ca.                [e-mail]
[phone] wk                                         [phone] fax
"When I make a joke, no one gets hurt; when Congress makes a joke, it becomes
law"                           -Will Rogers
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6

mQCNAi8PXwQAAAEEANg7hVToVEnjYl+YnhmQfewdRQL3csaJONnbaFnJKutyUgPO
4sRyYuEDVfthnQVKX+0ZDtSk/EbbDHMsVxbQHkIjDlJHWUBWyCa6VUF9lt/bQXX4
SD17HgwW+A/vJbb5dEq8aFb14E4a3YCtAELb+u5uog974Zbx+pn/f3DxmL4ZAAUR
tCBSaWNoYXJkIENyaXNwIDxjcmlzcEBuZXRjb20uY29tPg==
=vQHk
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: When does the Foothill College Swap in Los Altos, CA, start?
Date: 9 Mar 1996 22:01:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsv4k$[e-mail]>
References: <4gd2lf$[e-mail]> <4h5ulh$[e-mail]> <4h63tj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>what is the talk-in freq?
>
>--
>Richard Crisp                 Cupertino, Ca.                [e-mail]
>[phone] wk                                         [phone] fax
>"When I make a joke, no one gets hurt; when Congress makes a joke, it becomes
>law"                           -Will Rogers

Talk-in freq is 145.27 (-) SPECS repeater. I believe PL tone 100 is
recommended. I *used* to be a specs member but now live 800 miles north of
that swap meet.

73, Ed, KF7VY
-----
personal email to [e-mail]
Visit Ham Radio Online, it's free, at
http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Where Did Antennas Go To?
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 04:52:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0bq1$[e-mail]>
References: <4hvmmn$[e-mail]>

In article <4hvmmn$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] wrote:
>I haven't looked at news groups for sime time. My provider does not
>list rec.radio.amateur.antennas or rec.radio.shortwave. Did this go
>away or has my provider dropped them? Thanks for the help.
>Kevin AA1OR

I haven't looked for Shortwave, but Rec.Radio.Amateur.Antenna is sure
active.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:15 1996
From: Bert Burland <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Where to buy keyers?
Date: 7 Mar 1996 01:53:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4hlfja$[e-mail]>

I just aquired a Bencher BY-2 iambic paddle and am now looking for a
keyer to go with it.  About all found so far is the MFJ keyer which sits
atop the BY-2.  Was hoping for something a little more sophisticated.

Didn't AEA use to make a memory keyer, logging onto the AEA homepage
turns up nothing?  Maybe there's a kit or construction plans for a keyer?

By the way, could someone give me the definition of "iambic"?  I suspect
it has something to do with the two paddles seperate functions
(dot/dash)?  Can't find the word in any of my dictionaries, etc.

Thanks. 73's



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dave Cogan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WHO STOCKS ICOM GEAR IN THE US?
Date: 5 Mar 1996 04:19:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4hgfd7$[e-mail]>

Hi,

I am a ham in New Zealand and interested in buying one
of the latest modelIcom HF transcievers and a old model
Icom HF transceiver.

Very expensive in NZ.

Would like some details of retailers in U.S. so I can
ring them to find out prices.

Cheers
Dave
E Mail [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB Manual for Atlas 210X
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 15:37:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn01b$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

   Stan Witherspoon <[e-mail]> wrote:
>I am looking for a copy of an Atlas 210X operating & Service manual
>or pointers on where I could get one. I remember a company called HI
>manuals, but I have no other info.

You could try:

Brock Publications
P.O. Box 5004
Oceanside, CA 92052
[phone]

They sell bound copies of owners/service manuals for Cubic and Swan,
maybe also for Atlas.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:18 1996
From: asterix <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB reasonable VHF 16 Channel + Scan
Date: 6 Mar 1996 19:45:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4hkq0m$[e-mail]>

Looking to buy a sixteen channel scanning HT in the 160 MHz range
like the Motorola HT-1000 or similar

or need adress for Dealers with second hand units in good condition

Looking for a Reasonable price not New book value !!

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:19 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB Standard C-508A Dualbander
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 20:21:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4hn5tb$[e-mail]>




                I'm interested in buying a 508A used.   E-Mail
                me if you have one to sell.  TIA,       KB2KUZ, Alex



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:19 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: DSP.......
Date: 10 Mar 1996 05:27:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4htp8p$[e-mail]>

.....like Timewave DS-P-9 or 9+ JSP, even RS or MFJ.
What have you...how much?   Jim Dillon   WL7CMQ   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB: DUAL BAND W/SCAN
Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:48:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (RICHARD DOHERTY) wrote:

>IM LOOKING FOR A DUAL BAND HT WITH EXTENDED SCANNING CAPABILITY AT A
>FAIR PRICE. ICOM W 21AT, FT 530, STANDARD 508 OR?
>REGARDS, DICK


Richard,
H.R.O. has a special on the FT-530 right now for $299.00 (nib).
You would not like the W21AT as it has very poor RX audio.
73
Bill (N0EVG)


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (David L. Thompson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB: Heil BM-10 Boom/mic set for Yaesu
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 04:58:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4hr2le$[e-mail]>
References: <4hb4rp$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (David L. Thompson) wrote:


>WTB:  A BM-10 Boom/mic set, prefer wired for Yaesu with HC-4 DX
>Element.  Must be in working condition.  Send your reply only by
>E-Mail to me at [e-mail] with price.

>73, Dave K4JRB

I have one I bought from KR4DA.  Thanks.



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (dave)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Kenwood 440/450 hf
Date: 10 Mar 1996 05:42:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4htq3j$[e-mail]>

Looking for clean TS440 or 450 HF rig...please send info & price.

Thanks
David
KB5VQT
[e-mail]
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:22 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Yaesu FRG-7000/7700.......
Date: 10 Mar 1996 06:21:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4htsdv$[e-mail]>

.....or similar digital (o.k.maybe a -7 if good price) SState
receiver...maybe even Drake SPR-4...also looking for old tube
Magic Eye tuning radios   Jim Dillon   WL7CMQ  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rval58)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FRB-757 ?
Date: 3 Mar 1996 05:28:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4hbs96$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rval58)

Can someone decribe the relay box FRB 757 and it's hook-up?
Thanks much


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (R.M. (Dick) Kriss)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 vs FT-51R
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 09:23:07 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hrvgb$18a$[e-mail]>

Hi Barry,

I used to own a 530 and now have a FT-51R. Both great radios. The FT-51R
blows away the 530 for AM Rx. I do monitor some A/C freq and the 530 was
almost as worthless as my Kenwood 733A for AM. The FT-51R is the BEST I
have ever heard.

The batteries are better on the 530 and cheaper too. The audio quality
is better on the 51R.

Play with both and listen to to them. Both are good. I still prefer the
FT-51R over the 530. It is worth the extra bucks but be sure you get the
high powered unit.

Dick, kd5vu
[e-mail]
or
[e-mail]
Austin, Texas

In article <4hrvgb$18a$[e-mail]>, Barry
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> I am interested in purchasing either the Yaesu Ft-530 or FT-51R.
>
> Thanks,
> Barry -- KB2KK

--
Dick Kriss
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT411E
Date: 6 Mar 1996 06:42:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h75e3$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] wrote:

>I need the out-of-band mod for the Yaesu FT411E 2-meter HT. I got the mod fro
m the Oakland FTP site but they have two
>different mods for the same radio. I need to know which one is right or even
better. someone who has actually did the mod.
>Thanks Steve KF4FIO


Steve,
The jumper pad #3 should be the only pad that is soldered for the mod.
Unsolder all other pads. If you have a newer unit, remove jumper #2
and solder pad #3, then follow the rest of the instructions for
resetting and reprogramming the upper and lower limits.
Bill


From [e-mail] Mon Mar 11 13:55:26 1996
From: Lester Kemble <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu Relay - Will this work??
Date: 7 Mar 1996 01:32:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4hleak$[e-mail]>
References: <4hfnui$[e-mail]>

Yaesu makes a relay just for this. It Yaesu FRB-757 and it only costs about
$15.00. It as connections for PTT, gotund on RX or Ground on TX. It is
designed to plug into the radio and use its 12v power supply.
 73 de Les KG1D



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:25 1996
From: "Michael E. Pinault" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: (no subject)
Date: 13 Mar 1996 06:25:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5ppc$[e-mail]>
To: Help,identify,microwave,gear


I have 2 Motorola power amps for 1.8-2.3 GHZ -24 volt operation and am
looking for schematics/info: Numbers are MU594-12 and MLG1003A. Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
--
Mike Pinault --- N3CEV/7           | Anything under 50 MHZ must be DC!!!
Near Spokane "Spo-can" Washington  |
Locator DN17fl                     |




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:26 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4i5stc$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 18:56:35 GMT

In article <4i5stc$[e-mail]> Barry Brazier <[e-mail]
.au > writes:
>Is it possible to buy a HF/SSB radio that can be used for Marine and ham
>frequencies 2000 to 30000 . How much would a suitable secondhand radio
>cost. How does that compare to buying to separate marine and Ham radios

SGC has one, expensive and a bit clunky by amateur standards, but it'll
do what you want. They have a nice matching autotuner (also expensive).
I've heard, but haven't seen, that they have a new control head for their
radio that's much better for amateur use (has a tuning *knob* instead of
buttons).

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Albert)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 6 ch CB Walkie-Talkie...$10
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 14:15:02 LOCAL
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Working Realistic TR-215 crystal controlled CB
Walkie-Talkie with crystals for ch 9, 19, 14 installed
Good for parts or conversion to 10m.

$10.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:28 1996
From: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: A USA QSL BURO
Date: 12 Mar 1996 00:53:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4i2hte$[e-mail]>
Keywords: usburo usbureau usa buro usa bureau


* * * * * * * A T T E N T I O N   A L L   H A M S * * * * * * *

NOW SEND "QSL VIA USBURO" ON THE AIR!
USA QSL BUREAU FOR ALL YOUR DOMESTIC QSL CARDS, ALL 10
DISTRICTS, TERRITORIES AND TRUSTEESHIPS OF THE U.S.A.

SAVE $$$ ON POSTAGE-SAVE $$$ ON CALLBOOKS-SAVE $$$ ON CD-ROMS
FAST..PROMPT..PROFESSIONAL..SERVICE..FOR HAMS BY HAMS

RATES FOR YOUR OUTGOING CARDS;
2 - 10 CARDS $.10 EA. - 10 FOR $1.00 - 50 FOR $4.50
100 FOR $8.00 - OVER 100, $7.00 PER HUNDRED CARDS
PLEASE PUT CALLSIGN OF STATION YOU ARE SENDING CARD TO IN THE
ADDRESS SECTION (BACK OF CARD) IN 3/4 TO 1 INCH LETTERS!

NO CHARGE FOR CARDS SENT TO YOU BY THE BUREAU - BUT YOU MUST
HAVE AT LEAST ONE SASE ON FILE - ALL HAMS ENCOURAGED TO KEEP
AT LEAST ONE #6 SASE ON FILE AT THE BUREAU!!

SPECIAL SERVICES AVAILABLE FOR; CONTESTERS, CLUBS & SPECIAL
EVENT STATIONS, QSL MANAGER SERVICES ALSO AVAILABLE,
CONTACT US FOR MORE INFRMATION.

START ENJOYING THE SAVINGS AND BENEFITS TODAY!!
SEND US UP TO -4- #6(3-5/8 X 6-1/2) SASE's (W/1-STAMP-EA)
PLEASE PUT YOUR CALLSIGN IN TOP LEFT CORNER!!!  OR
YOU MAY SEND $5.00, YOUR CORRECT RETURN ADDRESS & WE SUPPLY
10 ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPES FOR YOU.

SEND YOUR CHECK/OUTGOING CARDS ALONG WITH YOUR SASE'S TO;
USA QSL BUREAU Dept-E
P.O. BOX 814
BREWER, ME 04412-0814

DON'T DELAY! DO IT TODAY! ENJOY SAVINGS & BENEFITS TOMORROW!

THE QSL CARD - THE FINAL COURTEOUSITY OF A QSO!!!
NOW, THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO QSL!!!
OPERATED BY AA1MF & CREW
E-MAIL [e-mail]
-EOF-


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (dave sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: 11 Mar 1996 16:04:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1iu6$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk68o$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4ho3ec$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Chris Weddle) writes:

>Les makes a good point, and I would be surprised if he were wrong. But my
>problem remains that a Windows application just won't do for me. And I've
>received email from other folks asking about programming SW to run on
>other platforms (NON-DOS/WINDOWS BASED). Having just received EZ-Clone in
>the mail, it lists Solaris, Linux and of course DOS as supported operating
>systems. And I'm told they decided against offering a Windows product. So
>perhaps this is a product filling a small niche in the market?

Just to clear up a small misconception, EZ Clone does in fact have a
product for Windows.  Currently, the Windows version of EZ Clone is
written to the Win32 spec, which means it'll run on Windows 95 and
Windows NT.  The menu driven and command line versions are currently
working in Win32, and the GUI version is in development.  A version
for Win16 (Windows 3.11) will follow the Win32 versions.

cheers,
dave sims
--
dave sims
[e-mail]
kc5jkn
http://www.acsys.com -- software for programming amateur radios


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:30 1996
From: Les Butler <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ADMS-1 Software for FT-51R
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 18:03:09 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hj9vc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Dave Dredge wrote:
>
> How could they possibly tell how I programmed the radio.
> I have the Yeasu software and every time I have used it
> the radio has started doing strange things.
>
> In one case, it would no longer switch to low power.
> In another case, even though the freq showed correct in the
> display it was 5khz high in memory mode but not in vfo.
>
> I have stopped using the ADMS-1 stuff.
>
> Dave DredgeI guess I would have sent a message to RT Systems or called. I've
 used
it since it was introduced at Dayton last year and it works very well.
There have been a few updates since then and if you need the latest
patch you can get it from my homepage.

http://www.cris.com/~lsbutler and go to the ham page and download the
patch.


The VFO and memory step sizes can be set independtly of one another.

Les


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:31 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: AIR Mosaic Feedback Mail
Date: 13 Mar 96 13:16:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Mail sent from AIR Mosaic (16-bit) version 3.07.04.02




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:32 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re:am&FM signals
Date: 11 Mar 1996 18:31:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1rhb$[e-mail]>

Hi all-

For the AM, get a 5 gallon plastic salad dressing/paint/sheetrock mud
bucket and wrap 40 turns of any old wire around it trying to get about
1/8" spacing.  Attach wires in place of AM black plastic thing that came with.

For FM-  put 'T'  antenna high as possible or go to stereo store and
buy a Terk, Parsec, or Recoton amplified antenna, but *not* over $30!
Then start positioning both of these for best reception. FM thingee
up high.
The bucket is known here as a North Sloper. It will amaze you. Turn off
all dimmers, electric heat thermostats, dimmed Halogen, lamps, and the
Interplaq toothbrush charger.(To get rid of noise).
Jim Dillon   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:33 1996
From: "Philip Singley, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Antique amateur radio equipment
Date: 16 Mar 1996 12:46:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4ied6p$[e-mail]>

Looking for a source for antique amateur equipment.  Any help
appreciated.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Don Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Any info on FT-50?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 01:18:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4iag87$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have talked to a few folks who tell me Yaesu will soon introduce a
new HT, the dual band version of the FT-10/40 (probably at Dayton).
Does anyone have any "advance info"? I'd be particularly interested in
size. Thanks in advance.  Don (KE4KYO)



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:34 1996
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 12:45:14 EST
From: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: calling all htx-100 users..calling all.....

Hello there I just picked up a HTX -100 and I had a couple of questions.

1. Are the leds supposed to light up on transmit as well as recieve?


2. How do you measure the SWR with this radio, the meter I have wants to
measure AM signal strength, and when I select CW from the mode button, and
depress the ppt or the trans switch, nothing moves on the scale...?
How do I measure the SWR?

Thanks for all the help in advance,
Jason  N1RWY   FN54VF


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (David, Michaela & Benjamin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Dentron Linear
Date: 13 Mar 96 12:38:10 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail].198.186.186.2>

Date: 6 Mar 1996 20:06:36 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Kris Cordova)
Subject: Looking for Information about Dentron Linear

>>> Which One?  David AA1FA

Kris Cordova
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:36 1996
From: Carl Estey <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Diplexor for 80-10 and 6 meters
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 07:40:35 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Some time ago I scanned a message that mentioned a device (diplexor or
duplexor?) that lets you connect seperate 80/10 and 6-meter antennas to
one input/output of a radio.  Such devices are common for VHF/UHF but
uncommon for 6 and 80-10 meters.  Can anyone tell me who makes  this
device?  Cost and model would be helpful too.

The specific application is the ICOM IC-706 which has on SO-239
connection that services 80 - 10 meters AND 6 meters.  I would like to
divide this for use with one antenna on 80-10 and another for 6-meters.
Fortunately, Icom did provide a seperate connector for 2-meters!

Carl
--
Carl Estey, Amateur Radio Station WA0CQG
Honeywell Inc., Homes and Building Control, MN10-2518, 1885 Douglas Dr.,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 [phone]
E-Mail:  [e-mail] or [e-mail]
(TCP/IP)


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:37 1996
From: ANDRE CORDEIRO ROMAO BORGES BRANDAO <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Dipole antennas
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:47:48 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I've been a SWL station since 1992 and soonly I'll be an amateur
station.
Inicially I'll use a dipole antenna:
I would like to know if you have any suggestion or you think you can
help me in anything, if so, send me An E-mail to
[e-mail]  or [e-mail].
Thank you very much, 73! CT01191, Andre Brandao.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:38 1996
From: Hank <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,
Subject: Does anybody still use NRD59 rig control program?
Date: 8 Mar 1996 15:29:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4hpjof$[e-mail]>

Does anybody still use the NRD59 rig controle program for the Japan Radio Co N
RD-525/535?  And if
so, do you want to exchange ASCII databases?  I'm just getting started with th
is program and would
appriciate any info/help received.  Thanks & 73 Hank [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Alfred Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: DTSS and Repeat on Kenwood TM-742A
Date: 13 Mar 1996 22:40:38 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, Mark Feit <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hey all...
>
> Had anyone had any luck using DTSS and cross-band repeat at the same
> time on a TM-742A?  I have a channel set up on one band in DTSS mode,
> and it works just fine in both directions when not linked to another
> band.  Once I put the radio into repeat mode, the DTSS tones are heard
> over the speaker when the transmitter keys up, but they don't go out
> over the air.
>
> This wouldn't normally be a big deal since I only want to code-
> protect inbound signals, but the HTs I want to use remotely can't be
> set up to transmit the DTSS code on transmit and open the squelch
> in the presence of only a carrier.
>
> For now I'll solve the problem by using a dual-band HT and listening
> for the other station there.  If anybody's got any other suggestions,
> they'd be welcomed.
>
> TNX ES 73
>                                            - Mark, KR4FH    ___._.

I have a 742 and use the repeat mode rather often.  I would be glad
to exchange notes.

My understanding is that the main use of DTSS in repeat mode is
to enable facilitate control.  There are two types of repeat mode
available: non-remote repeat and remote controled repeat.  In
addition, each of these modes can operate two way repeat or one
way repeat.

If you describe the exact circumstance of your repeat operation, i.e.
what are the signals (far end other party, 742 repeater, near end
remote HT,) and which links you want to protect, I will see what I
would do for the situation and get back to you.

73,

---
Alfred Lee                                                       [e-mail]
m
KE6KGV           'The answer is (e^iπ + 1) ? "No" : "Yes"'


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:41 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Bud Kuenzli)
Subject: DUAL BAND MOBILE - opinions wanted
Message-ID: <bud-1103960925580001@198.104.162.34>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:24:57 GMT

  I am looking to get a dual band mobile that I can use as a "repeater"
(cross band) for my 2 meter radio so I can get out more power.
   It must have a backlit dtmf pad mike and cross over both ways (2m to
70cm and visa versa)...at least I think some do this and some don't.
Currently I only own a 2meter and my main desire for this is so I can use
it when I am away from my car to get further out than my ht will allow.
   Here in Alaska we are in darkness a great deal so the backlit pad is
critical. Intermod problems are few in Fairbanks, so although that is a
consideration, it is not the overriding consideration.
   Any opinions?

--
Bud Kuenzli, North Pole Alaska
[e-mail]
XLTRMK
WL7CIK
ICUUCME



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:42 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: DUAL BAND MOBILE - opinions wanted
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <bud-1103960925580001@198.104.162.34>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:47:35 GMT

In article <bud-1103960925580001@198.104.162.34> [e-mail] (Bud
Kuenzli) writes:
>  I am looking to get a dual band mobile that I can use as a "repeater"
>(cross band) for my 2 meter radio so I can get out more power.
>   It must have a backlit dtmf pad mike and cross over both ways (2m to
>70cm and visa versa)...at least I think some do this and some don't.
>Currently I only own a 2meter and my main desire for this is so I can use
>it when I am away from my car to get further out than my ht will allow.
>   Here in Alaska we are in darkness a great deal so the backlit pad is
>critical. Intermod problems are few in Fairbanks, so although that is a
>consideration, it is not the overriding consideration.
>   Any opinions?

My old Alinco 570T works great in this manner, and you can probably
find one cheap. It doesn't have a backlit DTMF mike, though, but you
can change that by using another mike. It's real easy to operate
strictly by feel, however, so that really isn't necessary. That's
probably a good idea with any radio you may have to operate in the
dark. If you can't operate it easily by feel, its controls are laid
out poorly. The 570T has a switch on the top that puts it in and out
of crossband repeat, no secret codes you have to remember, or odd
combinations of keypresses and power cycles.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Dubner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Final Tubes: 6146 vs. S2001
Date: 12 Mar 1996 20:27:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4i4mmt$[e-mail]>

My Kenwood TS-820S came with a pair of S2001 tubes in the final.  They
look suspiciously like 6146s.  What's the difference -- anyone know?

Thanks and 73,
Joe, K7JD


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Dubner   K7JD  |  Hewlett-Packard Company  |  [e-mail]
                   |  24001 E. Mission Avenue  |
                   |  Liberty Lake, WA  99019  |  [phone]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:46 1996
From: "dave . n7da" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: For Sale: Keyer for ICOM 735
Date: 12 Mar 1996 01:43:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4i2krk$[e-mail]>

Like new $50.00 I ship



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:47 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS TS-140S
Date: 13 Mar 1996 13:33:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6ire$[e-mail]>

FS KENWOOD TS-140S  Mint, bought as back up rig. Very very little air time. ha
ve manual, mic and box.
Asking $700 and i will pay shipping.
Email victorj.@fast .net



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (James W Beckett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS-Swap Drake 1824
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 22:23:14 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

FS- or Swap:

Drake 1824 TVRO system- C and Ku
Orbitron SX-10 and special low 5.5' mount.
(Bolts to ground mount plate). The 1824 was
purchased from Bill Frost at Drake. (Used to
be a Drake dealer). I wanted one that was
right up to snuff.

I live at Corning in Western NY. It would
be impractical for me to ship the dish- so
it would have to be picked up. Although
disasembling it is easy and it retains the
proper settings- boxing it for UPS would be
a real pain.

I am interested in a Drake R8-A receiver and
controlling it with a computer.

Obviously that's a stretch because I doubt
there are many R8-A owners who are close and
might want to swap. One never knows,

I will entertain offers.

Why let it go?  In winter it works fine but in
summer some trees block out the very Sats
I want.

Jim
KD2KU





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:49 1996
From: Bob Kennon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:  ICOM-751
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 21:42:47 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I HAVE FOR SALE A ICOM-751. ALL BAND ALL MODE TRANSIEVER WITH GENERAL
COVERAGE REC.  200 WATTS PEP INPUT.

WITH THE FOLLOWING INSTALLED:
CW/SSB FILTERS.  FB BOARD.  VOICE SYNT. UNIT
I WILL SHIP WITHIN CONUS.

I AM ASKING $780.00
BOB KENNON E-MAIL [e-mail]     318-949-4074/ANY TIME.  TNX



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jospav)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: HT-600 VHF
Date: 14 Mar 1996 02:31:00 -0800
Message-ID: <4i8sh4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jospav)

I have a Motorola Ht-600 VHF 6 channel for sale. It has two batteries and
a charger included and is in excellent condition. Asking $300/offer.
Please call me at [phone]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Batura)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: ICOM 220MHz Handheld
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 03:37:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5g1m$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

For Sale:

ICOM 220 MHz Handheld w/DTMF and Battery

Excellent for Autopatch

New condition.

Best Reasonable Offer plus Shipping.

Thanks,
-John




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (GARY BARNES)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Motorola pp1000x
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:46:07 MST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have 10 Motorola Privacy Plus 1000x's for sale if interested please email me
.
Thanks,
Gary
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robyn Lyn Lempicki)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Yaesu FT-411E + stuff
Date: 13 Mar 1996 02:48:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5d1m$[e-mail]>

Hi!  I must part with my trusty 411 since I bought a Standard 508 and my wife
bought a Yeasu FT-530.  We have accumulated quite a few accessories too.
Here's the list:  Ft-411E...mint...recent factory alignment...looks like new
                  FNB-11 nicad
                  FNB-14 nicad
                  FNB-10 nicad
                  PA-6 mobile DC adapter
                  NC-29 desk quick charger

After totalling my receipts I see that I paid over $635 for all this when
new...not including the factory alignment and replacement of speaker/mike
jacks (looks like they put on a new case and knobs too!).  All mods have been
performed, and it works great!  The quick charger also has a mod to allow you
to select the charge time.  I am asking $375 for the lot, but will consider
reasonable offers.  Thanks! -Gerry KA1STZ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Charles R. Van Buskirk)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: galaxy500 power
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 07:01:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0j4n$[e-mail]>

I need a power supply for a galaxy 500 or a drake tr-3. well not me but my
father.. please let me know if you have one for sale or know where
I can get one

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Vince Fiscus,  KB7ADL)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GAP Voyager DX vertical antenna.
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 00:40:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4i2h8i$[e-mail]>


Is the GAP Voyager DX a good vertical ?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 20:51:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7coh$[e-mail]>
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

   Bill <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I picked up a set of KOSS PRO/4AA headphones at a garage sale, and
>would like a few opinions on how these would work for ham use.

If I remember correctly, those were low impedance (8 ohms?) phones
with fairly large driver assemblies.  The latter is exactly what's
needed to withstand the rigors of ham radio.  Unfortunately, I think
they were also about the same weight as an '89 Hyundai.

Try wearing them for an hour, then measure your height.  If you
haven't lost half an inch, I'm thinking of a different model.  ;)

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (James Moore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 12 Mar 1996 16:47:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>


        GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

        GrandMother wants rid of it.

        If interested call 1 800 996-2971

        Thank You



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:57 1996
From: Bill Funk <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 16 Mar 1996 02:38:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4id9ib$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <4i6l9j$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Clair Robinson) wrote:
>James Moore ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>:      GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
>
>:      GrandMother wants rid of it.
>
>:      If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>
>:      Thank You
>
>
>Could you at least tell us what state its in?
=====================
What do you wanna bet this is an ongoing commercial deal?
No descriptions, an 800 number...

--
        Bill Funk - [e-mail]
        ASCIi User Group - http://www.starlink.com:80/~ascii
                User groups: More info than you can shake a CD at!
                             Try one near you!




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:56:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 07:03:00 -0500
Distribution: world
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)


To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC

M> Howdy from another New Yorker. I am fairly clueless tho, just getting into
t >hobby.

Then take this advice, stay away from Barry Electronics!

---
   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

 * Origin: CyberNet BBS   Lyndhurst, NJ (1:2604/151)

              .....oooooOOOOOo         http://www.intac.com/~cono
      __,-----. ---+_________#_     The Roy Hobbs BBS [e-mail]
     |________| |__|___________}          Node 1: 201-641-7307
      ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\         Node 2: 201-641-3126



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Gianotti)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham-Equip Digest V96 #163
Date: 9 Mar 96 13:52:55 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

There is no choice, buy the Yaesu.  Had both, kept the Yaesu.  The
Kenwood failed 5 minutes after taking it out of the box.  Computer
programming of the Yaesu is the way to go.
--
     ____.      .__
    |    | ____ |  |__   ____
    |    |/  _ \|  |  \ /    \
/\__|    (  <_> )   Y  \   |  \
\________|\____/|___|  /___|  /
                     \/     \/
 __________________________________________________________
| John L. Gianotti KF9GW   [e-mail]|
| Dir Computer Services     VOICE:     [phone]  x260|
| Lake Central School Corp.   FAX:     [phone]      |
|__________________________________________________________|


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Silverwood)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Headphones -- thanks!
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:44:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4i49nn$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Thanks to all who provided comments regarding my headphones inquiry.  I
have a lot of information to digest now! ;-)


-- //Steve//

Computer Associates    CompuServe: 76703,3035
Fax: [phone]      Internet: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]    America Online: KB6OJS
Homepage: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/KB6OJS
Personal homepage: http://www.earthlink.net/~kb6ojs



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Heck)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Heath DX-20 Manual/Schematic
Date: 12 Mar 1996 13:57:34 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i3vse$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I'm looking for any documentation for the Heathkit DX-20 xmtr. Including schem
atic,
construction manual, etc. Copies would be just fine. If you have any of these
I
would appreciate hearing from you. Thanks.

John Heck
Dayton, Ohio



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christer Lindholm)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help ! Sommerkamp FTDX505
Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:07:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsktv$[e-mail]>

HELP!
Iwould like to get a copy of the operateurs manual or the service manual for
the old Sommerkamp FTDX505.
Copy and mail costs cherfully coverd.

73 de Chris SM4JFG

 [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help!  ICOM IC751
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 07:03:00 -0500
Distribution: world
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)


To: [e-mail]
Subject: Help!  ICOM IC751

JMG>Could anybody help me to fix a rig (ICOM IC751).
   >It seems the small RAM (it looks like that) has lost its contents.
   >The battery on board is drained off.
   >Thanks

I believe that once the memory is gone on the IC-751, the board has to
be sent back to the factory for re programming.

---
   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

 * Origin: CyberNet BBS   Lyndhurst, NJ (1:2604/151)

              .....oooooOOOOOo         http://www.intac.com/~cono
      __,-----. ---+_________#_     The Roy Hobbs BBS [e-mail]
     |________| |__|___________}          Node 1: 201-641-7307
      ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\         Node 2: 201-641-3126



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:04 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Joshy M George <[e-mail]>
Subject: Help!  ICOM IC751
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 04:32:43 GMT

Could anybody help me to fix a rig (ICOM IC751).
It seems the small RAM (it looks like that) has lost its contents.
The battery on board is drained off.
Thanks



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:05 1996
From: [e-mail](Wanda M Desmond)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.swap
Subject: HELP!! NEED service manual for TAC TEC transceiver
Date: 13 Mar 1996 06:30:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5q21$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <4i5btf$[e-mail]>

I need a service manual for a TacTec (RCA) #MJAW2-EC21G.

Thanks!

John
KE6TGN


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:06 1996
From: Don C Hamiel <hamiel>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: HELP!! NEED service manual for TAC TEC transceiver
Date: 14 Mar 1996 11:09:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4i8upi$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <4i5btf$[e-mail]> <4i5q21$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

What model tac-tec is it?

There is a company called RAB parts. I think they are in PA.
If not, look up Kyodo West. They made some of the Tac-Tec stuff. They made the
310sx line. I have some info on the 310 line and some new scanning control
heads too. They are good little radios (310sx).

Good Luck. 73 de Don N6NLX.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:07 1996
From: Cecil Moore <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 11 Mar 1996 16:32:12 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i1kic$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>If it is the alternator, it would be a good idea to check the
>alternator brushes.

Hi Gary, I was under the impression that DC generators had brushes
but AC alternators didn't. I'm chasing a noise problem in my S10.
Are there really brushes in there?

73, Cecil, KG7BK, OOTC  (not speaking for my employer)




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:08 1996
From: LeRoy <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 12 Mar 1996 05:09:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4i30tv$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1kic$[e-mail]>

Might not be the altenator. Altenator may have shorted or open diodes.
Could be fuel pump or fuel injectors.





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:09 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1kic$[e-mail]> <4i7skd$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 17:10:28 GMT

In article <4i7skd$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Ross Alexa
nder) writes:
>Cecil Moore <[e-mail]> writes:
>>[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>>>If it is the alternator, it would be a good idea to check the
>>>alternator brushes.
>
>>Hi Gary, I was under the impression that DC generators had brushes
>>but AC alternators didn't. I'm chasing a noise problem in my S10.
>>Are there really brushes in there?
>
>I torn the alternator in my Ford F100 down and rebuilt it a few years
>ago. (What I'm trying to say is that my experience is not broad, but
>deep :).  There are certainly a pair of brushes in there, carrying
>current for the exciter winding (the winding on the rotor).  But
>that's a DC winding so I wouldn't expect it to contribute a whine,
>rather a hiss *if* that was the problem.  Bypassing the brushes with
>small value disc ceramics should quiet the noise.

Sometimes, Ross, but usually they, or the slip rings, are chewed
up, and they arc like mad. Of course then you have a spark transmitter,
and it will produce the hash the poster was reporting. This is *not*
the source of alternator "whine", but the poster didn't report whine.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:10 1996
From: "C. J. Hawley" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 12:11:02 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1kic$[e-mail]> <4i7skd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Gary Coffman wrote:

> and it will produce the hash the poster was reporting. This is *not*
> the source of alternator "whine", but the poster didn't report whine.
>
> Gary

OK. How do you get rid of whine?

Chuck, KE9UW



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:11 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 06:28:38 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1kic$[e-mail]> <4i7skd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

C. J. Hawley wrote:
>
> > and it will produce the hash the poster was reporting. This is *not*
> > the source of alternator "whine", but the poster didn't report whine.
> >
> > Gary
>
> OK. How do you get rid of whine?
>
> Chuck, KE9UWUsually alternator whine can be cleared up by installing an inli
ne choke
in the power lead to the radio.  However I think the original poster
reported he had a 700 watt transmitter which means the choke would have
to be able to carry 50 or more amps without excessive voltage drop.
Maybe in this case the receiver DC input can be seperated from the
PA and can be filtered with a hotline filter.

The power cable must be of sufficient size and run directly to the
battery posts.
Sometimes alternator whine increases as the vehicles battery ages and
can be eliminated by replacment of the battery.
--
    Gene Kennedy, Mobile AL
    [e-mail]
    [e-mail]
    [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB7ASR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: 12 Mar 1996 16:43:20 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i49j8$[e-mail]>
References: <4hmvnf$[e-mail]> <4hu43u$[e-mail]>

So which would be more power efficient, torroid or cap/coil
type antenna tuner or tank circuit?



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT Battery Suppliers - Who the Best?
Date: 8 Mar 1996 13:43:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4hpdiu$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

I am very happy with the battery packs I've bought from both Periphex
and W&W Associates.  Never had any trouble with any of them.  As for
the W&W packs being physically inferior to the original, I have not seen
this.  The pack I bought for my Alinco DJ-F1Th is every bit as sturdy as
the original Alinco pack, which is saying something (modern Alinco HTs
are built astonishingly well).  I've used W&W and Periphex packs on my
older Kenwood HTs in the past and had no complaints what-so-ever.

FWIW ... YMMV ...                 73 de KC5NG



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT w/ RX to 475 MHz
Date: 10 Mar 1996 20:48:02 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Stephen Lui) wrote:

>I'm looking for a HT which can receive up to 475 MHz; the local police
>frequency is 474.1375. The HT's I've looked at only recieve up to 470 MHz.
>Can any of these be modified to recieve up to 475 MHz?
>
>Any suggestions for a dual-band HT in general?
>
>Stephen


Stephen,
The Icom IC-T21A will wide band RX on UHF although it only TX's on
VHF. It will go above where you want to RX.
Bill


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Glenn Johnson (KB5VQI))
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202 birdie fix, HELP!, RS claims no fixes...
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 17:40:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsfrq$[e-mail]>
References: <4h4jqj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>


>AFAIK the problem with the RS HTs is due to a harmonic of the Touchtone
>pad tone generator oscillator. A harmonic falls on 146.76 MHz. If that's
>your problem, you can try improving the shielding and bypassing of the
>TT pad oscillator. Some RS HTs are worse than others, but this is a generic
>problem, and not just limited to RS HTs.

Never thought about bypassing (removing power to) the oscillator.

A true mod to the 202 that inproves RX sensitivity!
A small switch to turn on/off the power to the DTMF circutry
should do the trick, you think?


****************************************************
Raki - Glenn Johnson - KB5VQI - Fort Worth Texas USA
HM - [e-mail] WK - [e-mail]
WWW - http://www.metronet.com/~raki/raki.html



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:16 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-242?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Fred McKenzie)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:05:58 -0500
References: <4ha3ve$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hojfo$[e-mail]>

In article <4hojfo$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (JRW) wrote:
> >There is an HTX-202 but no HTX-242.
> There is now. Cat # 19-1126.

I checked the local Radio Shack, and found that the 19-1126 is indeed in
the system.  However, none of the local stores has received any.

The HTX-242 is not in the 96 catalog, but is in the computer.  (By
comparison, there is a computerized oscilloscope probe listed in the
catalog, that isn't in the computer yet.)  The clerk said that being in
the computer indicated it was in the warehouse, but hadn't been shipped.
I suspect it isn't really in the warehouse yet, but a real order has been
placed with the manufacturer.

73, Fred, K4DII


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (GARY BARNES)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: I buy used 2-way radios
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:56:51 MST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>



I will buy just about any kind of used commercial two way radios.

Email me with the make and model and quantity and I will shoot a quote back to


you.

If needed call me at 602-649-1540 ask for Gary.

Thanks,

Gary


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom 260A manual needed
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 15 Mar 96 14:13:36 EST
Distribution: phl,pa,nj,del,md,dc,world

Hi,
Does anyone have a manual for an Icom IC260A 2 meter multimode transciever
that they would be kind enough to copy and mail to me? I just bought one
without the manual. I'll pay copying and postal costs.

Thanks,
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of c


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clark Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom 706 question - tuning?
Date: 12 Mar 1996 00:55:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4i2i1f$[e-mail]>
Keywords: Icom-706 manual-tuning

A few months ago I purchased an Icom 706, but haven't had a lot of time
to use it.

One thing I haven't figured out yet:  is there a way to get it to "turn
on the carrier" so that I can adjust a manual tuner?  The "tune" button
seems to only work for auto-tuners (and only ones with "Icom" on the
nameplate :-( ).

Plugging in the key and switching to "CW" mode isn't all that convenient,
but it is the only way I've found so far.

                                                Clark

--
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are mine and not those of Schlumberge
r
because they are NOT covered by the patent agreement!

Phone: [phone]                   Internet: [e-mail]
Packet:(not currently available) RF: KI7TU   ICBM: 33 20' 44"N   111 53' 47"W
Snail: Clark Jones, Schlumberger Technologies, 7855 S. River Pkwy #116, Tempe,
       AZ  85284-1825


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:20 1996
From: "George J. Molnar" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706 question - tuning?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 07:47:13 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i2i1f$[e-mail]>
To: Clark Jones <[e-mail]>

Clark Jones wrote:
>
> A few months ago I purchased an Icom 706, but haven't had a lot of time
> to use it.
>
> One thing I haven't figured out yet:  is there a way to get it to "turn
> on the carrier" so that I can adjust a manual tuner?  The "tune" button
> seems to only work for auto-tuners (and only ones with "Icom" on the
> nameplate :-( ).
>
> Plugging in the key and switching to "CW" mode isn't all that convenient,
> but it is the only way I've found so far.

Have you tried switching to AM mode and keying the mic?
That generates a nice carrier at reduced output - useful while
tuning up.

73

--
George J. Molnar
Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Amateur Radio: KF2T@N0QCU.#NECO.CO.USA.NOAM
http://www.interealm.com/p/gmolnar/index.html


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (John C. Oppenheimer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom IC-736 Informat/mods?
Date: 11 Mar 1996 14:06:22 -0600
Message-ID: <4i213u$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hptrm$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
Kelly Leavitt <[e-mail]> wrote:
>[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) writes:
>
>>In article <4hptrm$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>>
>>>Hows the noise from the speaker, even with the volume turned all the way
>>>down? Does it cover up weak signals? Does it drive you nuts with
>>>headphones on?
>>>
>>>If you find a "fix" for that, there are plenty of others who would like
>>>to know. ICOM "Refuses" to do anything about it!!
>>>
>>Well mine is quiet as the tomb with the volume turned down (in headphones),
>>the blankety blank *fan* makes enough noise to wake the dead though.
>
>Speaker is dead quiet with the volume truned down.  Fan is completly inaudibl
e,
>but the case rattles with strong signals (think I nhave a screw loose :-).

I asked ICOM America about the problem, here are the two answers:

    From:  Gary <[e-mail]>

    The hiss is normal, we do not have any fix for this at this time.

    Gary ICOM America, Inc

Then I asked Gary for more specific info and got:

    Most of our radio have some sort of low level hiss.  It because of
    the digital switching going on these days.  I am sorry my answer
    disappointed you.  I can not give you a modification if I do not
    have one to give.  Quite frankly we get very little complaints
    about the hiss, as it s very low level, almost can not hear it.
    Your personnel hearing may be sharper then most.  I do not know
    what else you want me to sy.

The "quite frankly we get very little complaints..." comment from ICOM
does not agree with the "there are plenty of others who would..."
comment above.  Maybe everyone should write to ICOM about the problem.
Use Gary's email address above, it works, or [e-mail],
which is where I started.

We could make a comment in QST.

I have found the hiss to be above the level of the 500Hz bandpass
noise on 80M when the volume control is set for a nice CW copy with
headphones.  I also went to Tucker to sample some of the rigs there.
I found that of the two, one was like mine, the other was quiet.  I am
thinking about returning mine for a replacement.

I don't think that it is digital switching noise.  My opinion is that
the cause is a noisy audio PA IC.  There is plenty of power supply
bypassing and the like.  The noise sounds more like high gain audio
amplifier noise to me.

John KN5L


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:23 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Kelly Leavitt)
Subject: Re: Icom IC-736 Informat/mods?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hptrm$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:28:10 GMT

[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) writes:

>In article <4hptrm$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>
>>Hows the noise from the speaker, even with the volume turned all the way
>>down? Does it cover up weak signals? Does it drive you nuts with
>>headphones on?
>>
>>If you find a "fix" for that, there are plenty of others who would like
>>to know. ICOM "Refuses" to do anything about it!!
>>
>Well mine is quiet as the tomb with the volume turned down (in headphones),
>the blankety blank *fan* makes enough noise to wake the dead though.

Speaker is dead quiet with the volume truned down.  Fan is completly inaudible
,
but the case rattles with strong signals (think I nhave a screw loose :-).

Kelly
KB2SYD


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (clint sutherland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM IC2410H
Date: 13 Mar 1996 23:55:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7na2$[e-mail]>

Hi, I want to find out what modification has to be done to my rig to
enable it to do cross-band repeater work. All inputs welcome !



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Aust)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom-W31A vs TH79A vs FT51R HT's
Date: 10 Mar 96 17:54:34 GMT
Message-ID: <9603101754.AA13030@gollum>


 Of the three Dual banders, I would like to hear
from those that have compared all three, especially
the W31A.
 Which unit has the best performance on VHF, UHF or both
bands for receive?
 Which unit get the worst intermod on VHF, UHF or both
bands for receive?
 For Battery life, which has more talk/listen time compared
to the others(which draws most current/least current?
 For VCO performance. which unit has the broadest locked rx/tx
VCO?
 Which unit has had most returns/least returns?
 If you have a unit, are you happy, unhappy, or ?? about it.
As you can guess I am interested in actual performance, not so much as
that it have/not have a PC/computer port for computers/Windows,etc.

Any comments would be appreciated, I have seen mods in the QRZ directory
on the TH79A, FT51R, but none on the W31A, if anyone has any, can you foward
them. Is the any difference between the W31A and its earlier version the
W21A??
Comparing them in the ham store, it seemed by inspection below:
Looking closely at the W31A, it seems it has a more sensitive
UHF receiver than the FT51R for out of band listening.
Another observation was the TH79A has a more sensitive VHF receiver
than the W31A for out of band.
Is the W31A more intermod proof on VHF than the FT51R?

Tempted to get the W31A, is it the best choice between ham band and a
out of band type receiver for an HT rig??
It seemed the W31A had a great out of band UHF sensitivity, while the FT51R
was somewhat deaf, and the TH79A ok, but could only hear up to 470MHz.

If anyone has a mod to get the TH79A above 470Mhz, can you e-mail it to me.
Thanks

73
Mike  :-)

-.-. --.- -.. -..-
.-- -.... - .-. .--

Morse Code is not dead!




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:27 1996
From: "H. Mark Nadel" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood  TS 660 for sale
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 20:06:36 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Kenwood TS 660 rig for sale;  Covers 21, 24, 28, & 50 mhz,  cw, ssb, am &
fm. Excellent condition. Complete with optional vox 4 speech processor,
vox unit and mc 50 microphone. $ 450.00. If interested pse email or call.
You can reach me at 516-796-2366 between the hours of 7 - 10 pm EST.

Thank you
Mark
--

<<<>>>

 H. Mark Nadel  -  [e-mail]
"Always Available Through Technology"

Look for The Radio Amateurs Defense & Information
Organization's  home page ...  http://www.islandlink.com/radio/radio.htm


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:28 1996
From: Thomas Martin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood Mics
Date: 11 Mar 1996 23:51:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4i2eap$[e-mail]>

Has anyone ever figured out what causes the top row of buttons
on a Kenwood mic to quit working? I have been in it and checked
the connections and solder traces but found no problems. I have
tried another mic and it works fine on the same rig. The radio
is out of warranty and probably could buy a new mic for what it
would cost to repair this one.

Thanks in advance...
[e-mail]
Thomas Martin N5ZNO




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (SKCaldwell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH79A vs. Yeasu FT-51R
Date: 10 Mar 1996 09:17:03 -0500
Message-ID: <4huo8v$[e-mail]>
References: <4ho7dt$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (SKCaldwell)

Yeasu is better for intermod.

Bought both units with the intention of taking one of them back.  (I
really found people liked both models...though a slight preference for the
yeasu was detected).

After testing them around a high rf area, I found the Yeasu to be much
better.  In fact it seems to be better than my older Icom W2A which was
great at the time.

Also seem to like the way the Yeasu programs a bit better.  It's a great
radio...very happy with the purchase.  CHeck out the programming kit to
connect it to windows/computer.  Makes changing/backing up really easy.

Sean Caldwell
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:30 1996
From: Jose <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM 733A
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 01:35:22 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi,
Anyone knows how to expand the frequency range of this radio?,
I have info. of other radios available.
Thanks


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:31 1996
From: Mike James <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Learn C/C++ programming on Win95
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 11:44:06 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i03qt$[e-mail]>

What does this have to do with Amateur Radio Equipment?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Alain Baudier)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Looking for data on 5 tone codes on ICOM
Date: 15 Mar 1996 20:01:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4iciam$[e-mail]>


I'm looking for all data available on 5 tones code used
by ICOM on H16T and  V200T (ie encoding, decoding,
repeater activation and all others special codes ...)



Please answer by mail to [e-mail] ,
(and don't expect a quick answer)
Thanks.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Mail Fraud (Was: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT...)
Date: 9 Mar 1996 05:43:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4hr5qi$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail] <4gks9a$[e-mail]> <4gon7k$[e-mail]> <4hnu68$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]

Distribution:

Dwayne S. Byrd ([e-mail]) wrote:
: [e-mail] (Drew Commins) wrote:

: >[e-mail] (Jack Harper) wrote:

: >>Its called Mail Fraud -- a federal crime...
: >>

When I was taken by a ham on Long Island last year, I can tell you that
yes you can write and get the Post Office involved.  You get a nice form
letter from them and bottom line a few hundred lost via US Mail ain't
big enough to make their list and don't expect any action.  They won't
even call or write the guy.   73  Robert


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dwayne S. Byrd)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Mail Fraud (Was: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT...)
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 04:11:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4hr6v4$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail] <4gks9a$[e-mail]> <4gon7k$[e-mail]> <4hnu68$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Drew Commins) wrote:

>[e-mail] (Jack Harper) wrote:

>>Its called Mail Fraud -- a federal crime...
>>

>Ah but the USPS won't let you stipulate "cash only" or "certified
>funds" like UPS and can it still be considered Mail Fraud if the US
>Mail didn't even touch the package?

Yes.  On Sept. 13, 1994 the Mail Fraud Statute  was amended to include
"private or commercial interstate carriers".  Federal Express and
others lobbied heavily for the bill, as they did not want to be a
haven for fraudulent actors seeking to avoid mail fraud prosecution.
The full text of the relevant section is set forth below:

Dwayne

Your friendly neighborhood air cargo lawyer
and ham (KC4POI).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or
artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of
false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to
sell, dispose of, loan, exchange,alter, give away, distribute, supply,
or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious
coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented
to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious
article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or
attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized
depository for mailmatter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or
delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited
any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or
commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any
such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or
such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at
which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is
addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If the violation
affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more
than $ 1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

(18 USC 1341)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Mail Fraud (Was: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT...)
Date: 11 Mar 1996 08:41:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0ouv$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail] <4gks9a$[e-mail]> <4gon7k$[e-mail]> <4hnu68$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4hr6v4$[e-mail]> <4hrdvt$[e-mail]>

WB3U ([e-mail]) wrote:

: >>Ah but the USPS won't let you stipulate "cash only" or "certified
: >>funds" like UPS and can it still be considered Mail Fraud if the US
: >>Mail didn't even touch the package?

: I missed the first part of this thread, but wanted to mention that
: USPS certainly will let you stipulate Cash Only on C.O.D.'s.  I just
: sent a large package using that method, and the receiving party was
: required to purchase a Postal Money Order as payment when the package
: was picked up.  USPS then mailed the money order to me as payment for
: the C.O.D.

They will? I make all my purchases by COD, and all of the local postmasters
have stated that the sender could NOT specify cash. They were perfectly
willing to accept a personal check, made out to the sender.

: Incidentally, there does seem to be some confusion at the Post Office
: regarding this option.  In order to be certain they don't make a
: mistake, the package (not just the form) should be clearly marked
: "Cash Only".  I wrote "_Cash_Only_or_Return_To_Sender_" on the carton
: in letters large enough not to be overlooked.

There certainly is confusion. You would have to provide a cite of the
relevant statute - or my local postal people will not believe you.

Bill


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tony Angerame - Sun SSE)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Midland GDO Help
Date: 12 Mar 1996 19:28:04 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i4j84$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]


Hello folks, I recently acquired a Midland tr-grid dip meter at a flea market.
 It was
a great buy at 5.00 dollars but it has no coils. Shouldn't be hard to wind som
e coils
huh...not. The coil socket seems to use all 7 pins. Does anyone have any docs
on this
thing? What I need is info that will help me wind some coils to fire this thin
g up.
I suspect that certain coils for different bands use different connections fro
m the
socket to the pc board that is the oscillator.


                                                               TIA


                                                        Tony WA6LZH





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Midland GDO Help
Date: 13 Mar 1996 03:27:21 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i5fap$[e-mail]>
References: <4i4j84$[e-mail]>

 Try the tech help at 1-800-MIDLAND.

[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:38 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Military Radios wanted
Message-ID: <1996Mar11.151450.17054@wvnvms>
Date: 11 Mar 96 15:14:50 EST

Wanted::  Military radios and military radio equipment.
 Like PRC/  type radios. Send E-mail to
[e-mail]
Thankyou,
Chris



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:39 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for IC-P4AT
Date: 16 Mar 1996 01:10:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4id4e8$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Pretty self explanatory, I'm looking for extended coverage mods for the IC-P4A
T.
I'm interested in trying to make coverage from 430-450 if possible.

Thanks, Steve
   N2RWE


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:40 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Nd Advice-DSP filter
Date: 11 Mar 1996 20:52:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4i23pk$[e-mail]>

Hi All-
Any input on Timewave DSP-9 vs JSP-NiR-10 vs Datong SL-3, particularly

for AM, (yes, boatanchor) reception? Any for sale?
Thanks   Jim Dillon  WL7CMQ  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:41 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Tim Murray <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Need Mods for IC2000H
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
References: <4hilkj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 04:09:59 GMT

Remove D8 Chip diode on logic unit. This opens up TX. Factory
Rx is 118-174.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Randy Padawer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap
Subject: NEEDED "Dr. QSO" by AEA (C64 cartridge)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 08:53:53 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I'm looking to buy someone's no-longer-needed "Dr. QSO" cartridge for the
Commodore 64 computer.  It basically simulated QSOs for morse training.  I
have the other old AEA cartridge (Dr. DX) and would like the "Dr. QSO"
version so I have both.  If anyone can help out with this, an email to
"[e-mail]" would be very much appreciated.

Randy Padawer, WA4FJF
[e-mail]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Randy Padawer,  P.O. Box 1167,  Knoxville, TN  37901-1167   U.S.of A
Internet: [e-mail]    AOL: Ad Randy     Tel.: [phone]
Department of Psychology,  University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.
--------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (JT)
Subject: Re: NiCad vs. GelCell for 12V 4AH batt'y
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 23:51:49 GMT

David Feldman ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I want to build a rechargeable battery for a portable transceiver. My option
s
: are either NiCad (a string of "D" type cells) or some kind of Gel Cell arran
ge-
: ment. I'm most concerned about getting maximum energy/weight ratio (inclusiv
e
: of a charger) and maximum peak current (it will be for a 100W class rig); co
st
: is less important (I'm only building one unit).

: Suggestions?

: 73 Dave WB0GAZ [e-mail]

Well this may get some flames so I'll put on the ole asbestos suit :)

From what I gathered from "the handbook"  lead acids work best for
applications that have a "short" draw and don't cycle all the way
down.  For example, in your car the starter draws heavily for a short
period of time, but for the most part the battery is "floated" at
13.8v.  Nicads, if you believe in the memory effect, work best if
the application drains them almost completely and then they are
recharged completely.  One shouldn't float Nicads like you do with
lead acids.  If I remember correctly, the handbook indicates that
Nicads have 10 times the number of full discharge cycles vs. lead
acid.

FWIW.

James KB6NYG

Let the flames begin!  :)

--
                                             [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:44 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Feldman)
Subject: NiCad vs. GelCell for 12V 4AH batt'y
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 01:38:00 GMT

I want to build a rechargeable battery for a portable transceiver. My options
are either NiCad (a string of "D" type cells) or some kind of Gel Cell arrange
-
ment. I'm most concerned about getting maximum energy/weight ratio (inclusive
of a charger) and maximum peak current (it will be for a 100W class rig); cost
is less important (I'm only building one unit).

Suggestions?

73 Dave WB0GAZ [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (GARY BARNES)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: portables for sale
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:41:52 MST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have the following portables for sale:

UHF
10 Standard HX320 4 channel 5 watt       $60 each
  2 Motorola HT90 2 channel 5 watt          $100
 9  Uniden 10 channel Synthesized pl/dpl  $ 125 each
VHF
1 GE MPD 48 channel pl/dpl  5 watt         $150
1  Motorola 2 channel HT50  5 watt           $100


I have more if you need something let me know and I will find it .

Email me or call 602-649-1540 ask for Gary.

Thanks,

Gary


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (M.F.P.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: PROGMNG 4 HT1000,MT2000 and MT1000 and HT600's CHEAP!
Date: 11 Mar 1996 17:08:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1mmu$[e-mail]>

I'll program ANY number of freqs, ctcss and Signalling, either HAM or
Commercial on any of the following radios:


GE PHOENIX S and SX's EEPROM

MOTOROLA:                    ***** ALL PRICES INCLUDE RETURN UPS Charges*****

MT1000   either model   16 ch version $25    99 ch version $35

MT2000   either model   48 ch version $30    255ch version $40

HT1000   either model   16 ch version $25

HT600    any model       2 ch version $20    6 ch version  $25


email me for shipping address and turn around times....

[e-mail]





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rob Neff)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack TRC-512 to 6M?
Date: 11 Mar 1996 11:28:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4i1rbh$[e-mail]>
References: <4hn6eq$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Bill Crocker <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Rob Neff wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>> I just picked up a RS TRC-512 49Mhz 5 Channel radio. I wanted to see
>> if I could get it to  go up on 6 M. Well, I was impressed with what I
>> was inside the rig. Dual conversion 10.7/455Khz, and PLL controlled.
>> I have played around with the BCD setting of the PLL but can only get
>> it to go to 49.970.

>Rob:

>I remember reading an article about doing just that with an earlier model of
>the single channel unit.  It was in one of the shortwave/HAM magazines...abou
t
>ten years ago.

>I realize this isn't much help, except maybe to keep you motivated!  :)
>Possibly someone else will recall the article, or has done it themselves.

>Good luck, Bill Crocker

Well, I did get it to move up to 52.525, but was unstable due to the
tuning cans on either side, rx/tx.. I was told by a friend that I
could try to stabilize it by adding or removing a cap accross the
can(s).

With a simple rock change, I could get the rig to go to 51.120 solid
on tx, but not so on RX. I imagine that id someone had the time, they
could wind a couple of coild that would lock this thing right where
they want it.  I think I will just place it back on the shelf for now,
and dive back into it another day.

And I did see the info on the single channel unit. It didn't go into
much detail, but RS does still sell those units!

73
Rob



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:49 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack TRC-512 to 6M?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Fred McKenzie)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:09:55 -0500
References: <4hn6eq$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1rbh$[e-mail]>

In article <4i1rbh$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Rob
Neff) wrote:
> Well, I did get it to move up to 52.525, but was unstable due to the
> tuning cans on either side, rx/tx.

Rob-

What is your secret to getting it up to 52.525?  Some of us might be able
to solve the tune-up problem if we had help with the synthesizer.

73, Fred, K4DII


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (David, Michaela & Benjamin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Reply
Date: 12 Mar 96 15:32:57 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail].198.186.186.2>

Kevin:
   I appreciate your concern for bandwidth, though I am not sure I see =
the problem with this application.  Compressed digititized voice and =
occasional bursts of digitized control data don't seem to be that ugly, =
especially as they will be occasional rather than 24 hours.

   The ISDN lines you suggest would be obscenely expensive & would put =
the whole project way out of reach.  The Internet construct is intended =
to eliminate our having to pay for the golden parachutes of AT&Ts chief =
execs.

   Another Ham has suggested PPP connections at the Club and at each =
members' home, with the Club computer dialing and connecting =
occasionally & waiting 5 minutes to poll for connect requests to the =
Club.  This seems a more elegant option.

   Only one user would connect at a time, perhaps on a sked, with some =
first-come first-served time slots as well.  I know I'm "painting =
outside the lines", so what have I missed here?   73, David AA1FA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:51 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Samplex Power Supplies?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4i56t0$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 18:39:55 GMT

In article <4i56t0$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Chris
 Dorn) writes:
>  Looking around for a supply for my Icom 745, and have been considering
>the Astron 20A (16Acontinuous), or the Astron 35A. Is the Astron 20A
>sufficient for the 745? I know it would be nice to have the 35A supply,
>but money is a factor. Also, when I was in my local Ham shop they were
>offering Samplex supplies in addition to the Astrons. Anyone know
>anything about these supplies. I see that they are made in China, and are
>less expensive than the Astrons, but are they any good?
>Thanks,
>Chris VE6RDC

I've used a RS-20A with a IC745. It works, but it is marginal. The
peak current draw of the radio exceeds the peak rated output of the
supply by about 10%. This may cause slight distortion on voice peaks,
though I got away with doing it, probably thanks to Astron's ratings
being somewhat conservative. The RS-35A is better because of the
reserve peak current capacity it offers. The RS-20A isn't going to
overheat or fail due to slightly exceeding its rated peak current,
however, because the IC-745 draws much less *average* current (about
1/8th of peak without speech compression) than 16 amps.

I don't know anything about the Samplex supplies.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Dorn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Samplex Power Supplies?
Date: 13 Mar 1996 01:03:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4i56t0$[e-mail]>

Hi,
  Looking around for a supply for my Icom 745, and have been considering
the Astron 20A (16Acontinuous), or the Astron 35A. Is the Astron 20A
sufficient for the 745? I know it would be nice to have the 35A supply,
but money is a factor. Also, when I was in my local Ham shop they were
offering Samplex supplies in addition to the Astrons. Anyone know
anything about these supplies. I see that they are made in China, and are
less expensive than the Astrons, but are they any good?
Thanks,
Chris VE6RDC



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark McPherson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SGC HF Transceivers
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 16:10:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4i4i7u$[e-mail]>

I've been thinking about purchasing an SGC SG-2000 HF transceiver for maritime

mobile use.  I need ITU marine HF transceive capability, a general-coverage HF

receiver (for marine weatherfax transmissions) and would like HF ham coverage
as well; but I really don't want to carry two radios, and the SG-2000 seems to

be one of the few units that is type-accepted for marine HF and has ham-band
coverage as well.

I have an SGC tuner and am reasonably impressed with its design and
construction; but nobody stocks the SG-2000 locally and I'm reluctant to
commit myself without some better information.

Anybody got experiences, pros, cons, or alternatives to offer?

Mark McPherson
N7NEE


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:54 1996
From: [e-mail](Nanci E Donacki )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: simulator software
Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:33:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4hsmep$[e-mail]>

Looking for a ham cw simulator for ibm-Please E-mail with any
info-Thanks


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG)
Subject: someone wanted HV bandswitch ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.swap
Date: 11 Mar 96 19:41:18 GMT

Hello -

I had email contact with someone looking for a nice HV bandswitch
and lost the address in my morass of files.  If you are out there,
I found the bandswitch, and if you contact me I can tell you
about it.

Clark
WA3JPG


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Andrew OBrien)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Source of Collins Parts ????
Date: 14 Mar 1996 03:57:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4i85g7$[e-mail]>

I have a ham friend looking for a source for Collins parts, any ideas?


--
Andrew J. O'Brien

[e-mail]
PACKET = KB2EOQ@KB2EOQ.#WNY.NY.USA.NA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (wayne burdick)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Spanish-language manuals available for new QRP kits
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:53:46 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

...de Wilderness Radio,
P.O. Box 734
Los Altos, CA 94023-0734
U.S.A.

[phone]    Engles, por favor.    (English only, please.)

No hablemos Espanol en el telephono.   Por Favor, por preguntas en
Espanol, escribe.
(Sorry, we can't answer questions in Spanish on the telephone.  Please
write to the above address if you only speak Spanish.)


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (JA Glasscock)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: subscribe
Date: 10 Mar 96 07:11:38 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

subscribe




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paolo Costagliola I8USE)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Telereader CWR 670E
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 10:47:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4i3n1j$[e-mail]>

Hallo everybody!
I' m searching for informations and instruction manual of an old
telereader.
The only informations I have are: Telereader CWR 670E.
Please help me.
Send all you know about to [e-mail]
                                          73 73 73 73 de I8USE Paul



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:57:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dwain M. Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ten/tec omni d ?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 12:06:29 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4gvsmo$[e-mail]>

In article <4gvsmo$[e-mail]>, penny mueller <[e-mail]> wrot
e:

> need info on ten tec omni d hf rig 1979 .I have been offered
one
>
> for $ 300.00 .
>
>
I have an OMNI of about that vintage that I use almost every day. It works
well for me and I like it. Of course it doesn't have all of the latest
"bells and whistles" but it performs well for me.

WB8YQK - Dwain

--
Dwain M. Mitchell
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:00 1996
From: [e-mail],uk
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Test
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 04:18:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4i4m9p$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (-Unruh,J.D.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Thief-proofing
Date: 11 Mar 1996 14:55:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1esq$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
David Stockton <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Mark Pettigrew ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>: (a) does anyone know of any good theft-proofing methods for radio
>: equipment (apart from the obvious things like buckets of sulphuric acid
>: which are both dangerous and illegal)?

You could build heavy metal brackets that bolt around the radios and
lock or bolt to the desk.

John Unruh


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:03 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Thief-proofing
Date: 11 Mar 1996 19:16:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1u6v$[e-mail]>
References: <4i1d5m$[e-mail]>

Chris,

Your concepts for "theft-proofing" radios are sound,
BUT you're forgetting the vindictive nature of many
crooks.  When they can't get the radio out easily,
they'll rip/smash/destroy your dash and radio to re-
pay you for *YOUR* insolence!  It's a "no-win".  You
might as well "let them have it" and carry good in-
surance.

Bill Young
[e-mail]
KB0UZQ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Blood)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Thief-proofing
Date: 11 Mar 1996 23:25:01 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i2cod$[e-mail]>
References: <4h1cen$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1d5m$[e-mail]>


This reminds me of a rig I saw in Miami about 20 yrs ago. The owner had
a 1/4" by 2" slot cut through the middle of the rig (from top to bottom)
and a IRON T that passed through the slot then padlocked to a chain.
I wonder how many of todays rigs have enough room to locate such a
hole through the middle? HI.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed Juge )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Timewave DSP-500zx ????
Date: 11 Mar 1996 18:40:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1s30$[e-mail]>

Is anyone using one of these?  How does it compare to others?  Any info
would be appreciated.

Would appreciate email response to [e-mail].

Thanks... Ed, W5TOO


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:05 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: TM-732a  probablem and schematic needed
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Keywords: Kenwood TM-732
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4i09a9$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 18:53:57 GMT

In article <4i09a9$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (John McCarty
) writes:
>My Tm-732a drops down from 50 watts about 10amps to 20 watts
>about 5 amps after I have been keyed up for about 3 seconds.
>Then after 3 more seconds it drops down to about two watts and
>an amperage fluctuating around 2-3 amps.  It only does this on
>two meters not on 70cm.  I am am also in need of a schematic
>for this radio if anyone has one or knows where I can get one.
>Wesley McCarty
>KC5ACC

Oh, oh, sounds like the metalization in the PA module is opening
up. I had this happen with a TS-790A. Eventually it fails completely.
This is not a user servicable component. You have to replace the
PA module.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:06 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trade HF transceiver for R7000 or 2m allmode.
Date: 9 Mar 1996 15:20:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4hs7jr$[e-mail]>

Trade a Yaesu FT-757GX transceiver with general coverage receiver
(500 kHz to 30 MHz) and computer controlled compatable (CAT system).
Also has RF pre-amp, speach proc., and dual VFOs. Will trade for
a ICOM R7000, ICOM R7100 or 2m all-mode base.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (creal)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Used Kenwood Tk-930 - What is the going price?
Date: 11 Mar 1996 20:38:50 -0500
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <4i2kja$[e-mail]>

Subject line asks it all.  Any info is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Rich


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: wanted Rubber Duckies
Date: 12 Mar 1996 07:24:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hlql7$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Jeff Hall) wrote:

>  I have lost all my rubber duckies somewhere and now I must start all
>over again...I need a 2 meter and a 2meter\440 rubber duckies...Thanks..Jeff

You can find what you need at stores like Ham Radio Outlet and Amateur
Electronics Supply, or order from Centurion direct.
Bill
N0EVG


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted! Dual band HT
Date: 10 Mar 1996 01:04:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4ht9ro$[e-mail]>

I am looking for a dual band HT with 800mhz recieve, and dual freq
recieve.
I have an Icom W21AT that I bought a week or two ago, and it does
EVERYTHING but recieve 800mhz, and I don't have a scanner to do so..(I
had to sell it to get the HT.) The point being, I'd like to swap if I
could for an HT that will do this. The W21AT is brand new, and has the
cool whisper function, that allows telephone-style conversations, as it
has a mic in the battery. It comes with the leather case, and a speaker
mic.

Nate.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay B)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted, Yaesu FT-990 or similar hf rig
Date: 10 Mar 1996 20:48:48 -0500
Message-ID: <4i00q0$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay B)

wanted to buy - a yaesu (preferred) hf rig, newer vintage.  hopefully
works good, reasonably priced.  thanks.  Jay


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:11 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Martin)
Subject: WANTED: ICOM ICW31A Mods
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 16:12:20 GMT

all:

  Are there any mods available for the Icom IC-W31A
radio?

David



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:11 1996
From: desira <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: Kenwood TS520SE manual
Date: 12 Mar 1996 11:59:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4i3our$[e-mail]>

This manual is no longer in print. Does anyone have one that
can be copied. I am looking for the operating and tech manual.

        Thanks, Doc
                KF6CAD


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:12 1996
From: desira <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: Kenwood TS520SE manual
Date: 12 Mar 1996 11:59:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4i3oug$[e-mail]>

This manual is no longer in print. Does anyone have one that
can be copied. I am looking for the operating and tech manual.

        Thanks, Doc
                KF6CAD


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:13 1996
From: desira <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: Manual for Kenwood TS520SE
Date: 13 Mar 1996 03:24:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5f5i$[e-mail]>

I am looking for a copy of the operating and tech manual for a
Kenwood TS-520SE. They are no longer in print but would like to
have a photo copy of them.
        73's  Doc
        KF6CAD





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Hall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: SWR meter for HT..vf or vhf/440
Date: 11 Mar 1996 18:49:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1sj1$[e-mail]>

  I am looking for a SWR Meter for my HT..I would like a VHF or a
VHF/440..5 watts max. is all I need...thanks..Jeff


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:15 1996
From: Michael J Wooding <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 11:45:09 +0000
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <4idjm1$[e-mail]>, David Mark
<[e-mail]> writes
>What's happening is your radio is probably tuned to an FM station
>near the upper end of the band (around 107-108mhz) and you're
>probably under a flight path.  When a plane is nearby (there's
>that word again) and the pilot transmits on one of the lower
>airline frequencies, your radio's less than discriminating tuner
>picks it up.

Whilst that is very feasible, due to the low powers transmitted by
aircraft (RX levels of the order of less than -90dBm even with the sorts
of aerials and masts etc., that we use in the CAA !) then I would
imagaine that the aircraft must be relatively low when overflying his
property to cause these signals to be strong enough to swamp the radio.

Mike

Michael J Wooding   [e-mail] - CompuServe: 100441,377
WWW: http://www.eolas.co.uk/ag/vhfcomm.htm (hambits.htm & hamclip.htm)
WWW: http://www.clearlight.com/~vhfcomm
Tel: [phone]   Fax: [phone]
KM Publications, 5 Ware Orchard, Barby, Nr.Rugby, CV23 8UF, UK
VHF Communications Magazine - Especially Covering VHF, UHF and Microwaves


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:16 1996
From: Dexter Francis <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is this Hallicrafters?
Date: 11 Mar 1996 18:29:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4i1re5$[e-mail]>
References: <4h7j7n$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Hallicrafters made a number of receivers with the Skyrider name, the
S-28's being the most common.  There were other variants, but I don't
have my list handy at the moment.  There should be an ID plate on the
back of the radio, as well as the engraving on the front, which may have
more information on it.

If you can figure out a serial number or get a date off one of the
components inside it will help narrow the search.  Most of the
Super Skyriders came in a metal cabinet, but some were rack mounted
due to use by the military.

hope this helps.

-df (N0YLJ)




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:17 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB   --   SHURE  404C  MOBILE  MIC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: Bill <[e-mail]>
Date: 13 Mar 96 16:30:13 CST


Looking for a Shure 404C in excellent to mint condition.

73s

Bill
AA4FM/0
Eudora, Kansas, USA



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB reasonable VHF 16 Channel + Scan
Date: 12 Mar 1996 07:21:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hkq0m$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

asterix <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Looking to buy a sixteen channel scanning HT in the 160 MHz range
>like the Motorola HT-1000 or similar
>
>or need adress for Dealers with second hand units in good condition
>
>Looking for a Reasonable price not New book value !!
>
>[e-mail]


Due to the fact that the HT-1000 is a new  model, I doubt that you
will find one at a "reasonable price." This unit replaces the MT-1000
which you might find at better prices.
Good Luck,
Bill
N0EVG


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: CHEAP 2 Meter Radio
Date: 12 Mar 1996 00:52:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4i33e8$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)

Hello,
  I run a DX/CLUSTER node on 2Meters and looking for another rig to put
online     for a backup. For the past couple of weeks I have seem people
selling radio's   cheap around here.. and I personally have a budget of
$175  So, if you have a   cheap SYNTHESIZED radio please  email be back
with details.

  Thanks for your time... and hope to hear from someone soon!   N9MXT1 -
Jeffrey


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:20 1996
From: Gene Shablygin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Drake TR7/TR7A/R7
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 23:01:52 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Looking for good TR7A or TR7 loaded with Noize Blanker, Digital
Readout, filters, with power supply and other goodies; also
interested in R7A (or, again, loaded R7).

Please e-mail to [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:21 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: WRE00@email_address
Subject: WTB: National Receiver NC100XA
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: Radio National Receiver NC100XA
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 02:22:30 GMT

I have a friend who is look for a National Receiver.  He is looking
for a NC100XA or NC200xx.

If you have one or know of where he can find one, please send me Email
and I will pass it one to him.

                                Thanks, Rick, KD6VEG.


Email Address   : [e-mail]
Packet Address : kd6veg@n0ary
Web Page        : http://netservers.com/kd6veg/


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:22 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FRB-757 ?
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 04:36:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4ho6e9$[e-mail]>
References: <4hbs96$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Rval58) wrote:

>Can someone decribe the relay box FRB 757 and it's hook-up?
>Thanks much


The FRB has 2 cables coming out with RCA plug attached.  The red goes
to 12 (13.5) volts and the blue goes to ur PTT.  In addition, there is
a RCA jack on the side the 2 cables exit from and it is also PTT.  The
two RCA jacks on the other side are  Normally closed (on the left when
the top is facing you with the connectors aimed down) and normally
open on the right.

If u have other questions, send me e-mail.

         73/DX

cdn


           C. Dean Norris
      Amateur Radio Station K7NO
      e-mail to [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:23 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-11R ... anyone use this radio?
Date: 13 Mar 1996 00:38:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4i55f3$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Hello all,
      I was wondering if anyone has used or owned the Yaesu FT-11R HT?
Because of the great advice I received from other hams from this newsgroup,
I have decided to get an HT.    Had a few questions:
Any significant intermod problems?  Batt problems?  Can I use an external
mike, antenna, etc?

Thanks for any help!

73's...

- Bill
  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Byrnes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-11R ... anyone use this radio?
Date: 14 Mar 1996 18:15:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4i9nnu$[e-mail]>
References: <4i55f3$[e-mail]> <4i7pi3$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Carl H Nord ([e-mail]) wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:

> >      I was wondering if anyone has used or owned the Yaesu FT-11R HT?
> >Because of the great advice I received from other hams from this newsgroup,

> >I have decided to get an HT.    Had a few questions:
> >Any significant intermod problems?  Batt problems?  Can I use an external
> >mike, antenna, etc?

Intermod seems to be better than average, but can still get you.  Battery
problems?  Not any caused by the radio.  I have a hot rod, and I know
people who've used mag-mounts successfully with theirs.  I have yet to get
a external speaker/mike, but may do that soon.

> I love mine. It is probably the 6th or 7th HT I have owned and by far
> my favorite.
> It is a nice size, covers the entire Aircraft and commercial VHF
> bands, and just works well.

Yes, I like mine too.  However, before you buy make sure the *particular*
FT-11R you buy doesn't have excessive CTCSS modulation.  This is a problem
for some series of them, and not others (I am waiting for a service bulletin
from Yeasu).  Have someone transmit using the FT-11R with and without the
tone turned on.  If you hear a hum, it's too loud (it should be sub-audible
by definition).  If you buy the optional CTCSS decode board, you will be
able to adjust the modulation.


> It has a lot of functions and you will simplify your life greatly if
> you spring for the ADMS-1 computor inerface.

Don't do this unless you have a computer! :-)  Personally, having a computer
at home would cause more problems than programming my HT.

John
KB0UNC



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:26 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Jean-Marie Houle)
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 vs FT-51R
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hrvgb$18a$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 05:20:50 GMT

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(R.M. (Dick) Kriss) wrote:

> Hi Barry,
>
> I used to own a 530 and now have a FT-51R. Both great radios. The FT-51R
> blows away the 530 for AM Rx. I do monitor some A/C freq and the 530 was
> almost as worthless as my Kenwood 733A for AM. The FT-51R is the BEST I
> have ever heard.
>
> The batteries are better on the 530 and cheaper too. The audio quality
> is better on the 51R.
>
> Play with both and listen to to them. Both are good. I still prefer the
> FT-51R over the 530. It is worth the extra bucks but be sure you get the
> high powered unit.
>
> Dick, kd5vu
> [e-mail]
> or
> [e-mail]
> Austin, Texas
>
> In article <4hrvgb$18a$[e-mail]>, Barry
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> > I am interested in purchasing either the Yaesu Ft-530 or FT-51R.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Barry -- KB2KK
>
> --
> Dick Kriss
> [e-mail]

I have the  FT51R and my son has the FT530. I prefer the 51 because it is
simpler to operate, has an alphanumeric memory display and all the options
are easily setable. The 530 has many more options like a clock display and
programable power off and on, but you need the manual to change those
settings you do not use often.

As for the power, I have both the small and the large (5W) batteries. Most
of the time, I use the small battery. The diffrence in power is not so
apparent but the difference in weight and size is.

--
Jean-Marie VE2AEY


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:27 1996
From: "Bruce J. Howes" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-8500 MARS/CAP Mods
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 22:23:46 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

If anyone out there has the MARS/CAP mods for this radio I appreciate a
email to [e-mail].


73,
Bruce KB2VKJ

=======================================================================
 Bruce J. Howes KB2VKJ       "The governmentÆs view of the economy
 Grid FN03pa                  could be summed up in a few short phrases:
 East Amherst, NY             If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,
 AMSAT#30466 ARRL             regulate it. And if it stops moving,
 ARMY-MARS AAR2AJ/T           subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
=======================================================================


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:28 1996
From: Joe Fitter  BV/N0IAT <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu MD-1 Question
Date: 12 Mar 1996 07:05:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4i37ms$[e-mail]>
References: <4haafp$[e-mail]> <4hr2jp$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (David L. Thompson) wrote:

>The audio of the stock MD-1 is too base and mellow for voices outside
>JA.  But sounds like you have a bad element or bad wiring.

What does the country a person comes from  have to do with voice
fidelity?  Are you kidding Dave?

>Most of us get rid of the MD-1 (or at least the mic portion).  You
>might try putting in a Heil HC-4 or 5 element and perhaps wrapping the
>side holes in the barrell.   Good luck.

To the original poster:

I've heard the mic element is lousy in the MC-50, but not the MD-1.  I
suspectthe original owner found the same problem and sold the mic.  I've
had an MD-1 for about 4 years, and it has plenty of audio...in fact, the
audio is better than a kenwood mc-60 (according to on air reports).
I suspect a bad mic element...any replacement element would be better
than the current one.  With speech processing on, I can be 12 to 18
inches from the microphone and drive to ALC deflection.

>73, Dave K4JRB

Joe


----------------------------------------------------------
Amateur Radio:  BV/N0IAT   Taipei TAIWAN Republic of China

ex.  7J1AOF (Japan)  YU3/N0IAT (Slovenia)  KA0ZDH (Novice)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986.  Comments are mine only.
----------------------------------------------------------




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (jeff griffin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: YEASU 5100 S/W
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 16:16:58 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Does anyone know of any s/w available to program, back-up, and restore
memories on a 5100? It seems if a radio can be cloned it can  be programmed.
Jeff


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:30 1996
From: Jeff Joynt <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu FT 2500 mods
Date: 11 Mar 1996 05:17:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0d1k$[e-mail]>
To: all

What is the modification for this radio for extended transmit?
Please reply to [e-mail]    Thanks



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:31 1996
From: Jeff Goebel <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu FT-530 poor tx output??
Date: 13 Mar 1996 02:32:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5c4r$[e-mail]>

I have a Yeasu FT-530 which seems to have very low TX output.  With the
supplied battery (7.2v 600mah) it puts out 1w on UHF and 2W on VHF.  On
13.8v it runs 2 watts UHF and 3 watts VHF.

I wouldn't have noticed so much but I just bought a new TH-79 and it puts
out 2+ watts UHF with the supplied 6 volt battery.

Can anyone shed light on this?  Any adjustments that I can try?

Thanks,

Jeff Goebel N0VHB
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:32 1996
From: Jeff Joynt <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu FT2500M
Date: 11 Mar 1996 05:26:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4i0dib$[e-mail]>

I need some info to modify this radio for extended receive.
thanks !! [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 16 15:58:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (MICHAEL KILLIAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu VC-22 VOX headset
Date: 13 Mar 1996 18:32:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4i74cg$[e-mail]>


I have an FT-11R and a VC-22 VOX headset.  Does anyone know of
a way to get "some type" of audio feedback to the earpiece when
the VOX is keyed?  Sometimes I find that the gain is not high
enough and without looking at the LED I can't tell that I am
dropping out.

My kids have a set of Radio Shack VOX 49 Mhz headsets and that
design actually echos (at very low volume) your speech.

For me, just about anything will do, even a low tone or click
or something.

Thanks
Mike
KC7JGC


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:18 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: "Virtual Collins Radio Museum" web site
Date: 18 Mar 1996 03:11:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4iik9n$[e-mail]>

Just a note to let everyone know that the WA3KEY
"Virtual Collins Radio Museum" web site is up and
running.  There's still some construction goin on
so don't mind the sawdust.  Here's the URL

  http://www.users.fast.net/~wa3key/collins.html

Any comments or suggestions are welcome.  Enjoy

  73 de Norm - WA3KEY
  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:19 1996
From: "Philip Singley, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: (no subject)
Date: 16 Mar 1996 12:42:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4iecv5$[e-mail]>
To: Antique,Amateur,Radio,Equipment

I'm looking for a source of antique amateur radio equipment.  Any help
appreciated.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:20 1996
From: Barry Brazier <[e-mail] >
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: (no subject)
Date: 13 Mar 1996 07:19:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5stc$[e-mail]>

Is it possible to buy a HF/SSB radio that can be used for Marine and ham
frequencies 2000 to 30000 . How much would a suitable secondhand radio
cost. How does that compare to buying to separate marine and Ham radios




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:21 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mad Dave Bullock)
Subject: 2E22 and ANGRC-9  military radio
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:40:16 GMT

Many Thanks to all those who responded to my plea for info on the
angry9 transmitter and the output bottle 2E22. The response was
overwhelming true amateur spirit stuff.
I can now sift thru the data and hopefully get the TX working.
Thanks to all!   Dave....G6UWO


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Bennett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 40m Qrp, kit
Date: 12 Mar 1996 20:47:09 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>




There was a evaluation of qrp kits by i believe 73 this month. One of
the kits, a 40 meter xciver was available to their club members only.
I beleve the club  was the bay area DX club.
Does any one know where to get the kit? and /or join their club?
Bill
KC6YOX
(619) 4334626
[e-mail]






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Bennett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 40m Qrp, kit
Date: 13 Mar 1996 17:45:20 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

There was a evaluation of qrp kits by i believe 73 this month. One of
the kits, a 40 meter xciver was available to their club members only.
I beleve the club  was the bay area DX club.
Does any one know where to get the kit? and /or join their club?
Bill
KC6YOX
(619) 4334626
[e-mail]






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:23 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Russ Rinckey)
Subject: 706 INFO NEEDED
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 22:33:41 GMT

I am looking at a new 706 but have herd that the latter ones are better?
If so what serial number should i look for.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (timothy charles phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:19:53 -0500
Message-ID: <4ighv9$[e-mail]>




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (timothy charles phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:24:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4igi86$[e-mail]>

hello,I need mods to trans. in the 151 mhz. range for work.It would
prevent me from adding another radio and ant. to my truck.

                                  thanks Tim,KF4FCO


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Myers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: 17 Mar 1996 10:22:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4igp4b$[e-mail]>
References: <4igi86$[e-mail]>

In article <4igi86$[e-mail]>,
timothy charles phillips <[e-mail]> wrote:
>hello,I need mods to trans. in the 151 mhz. range for work.It would
>prevent me from adding another radio and ant. to my truck.

I don't know the mod for the IC-706, but keep in mind that the
IC-706 is not (and can not be) type accepted for use in the US
Part 90 Land Mobile Radio Service.  Though it seems it is very popular
to use amateur transceivers in Part 90 service, it isn't legal.

--
 * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are      *
 * [phone]               | mine and do not necessarily   *
 * [e-mail]      | reflect those of my employer  *


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anton HOLLAUS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: 18 Mar 1996 23:12:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4ikql8$[e-mail]>
References: <4igi86$[e-mail]> <4igp4b$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Re: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz

we have amateurs in 3. countrys and by mil. and by exped.
Why not ?
we have alle the liz.
and we know the rules ...

we are not children !!!


vy 73



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (tom wallace)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 8950 tube needed
Date: 17 Mar 1996 04:56:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4ig62r$[e-mail]>

I am looking for an 8950 transmitter tube for my siltronix
camanche. if anyone has a good one for sale, or knows where
I may find one, please e-mail me.
thanks in advance.
-tom kb0dsv.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:29 1996
From: David A Allen <davida>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Adding PL tones to old rig?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 16:35:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4imnou$[e-mail]>
References: <4iksh8$[e-mail]>

Hello Bob!

I saw your posting in rec.radio.amateur.equipment and couldn't resist
responding...

[e-mail] (Bob Boardman) wrote:
>
>    This weekend I adopted an old Icom IC-211 2 meter all mode that needed a
>  new home (The original owner having bought one of those fancy new Kenwood
>  144/220/440 tribanders).  It seems to be a very solid older reg, with
>  very good intermod rejection, but it would be nice to also be able to
>  use it on a few of the local repeaters that require tones.  Is there
>  any easy and/or relatively inexpensive way to add PL tones to this
>  rig?
>
>  -Bob  KC5SFW

You may want to contact Communications Specialists.  They make CTCSS encoder/
decoder boards and have several application notes on how to use their products
with older radios.  (Sorry, I don't have their phone number handy, but I
believe
they advertise in QST...)

Hope this helps!

'73

Dave Allen, N0IPQ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:30 1996
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Adding PL tones to old rig?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 03:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4iqiak$[e-mail]>
References: <4iksh8$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Bob Boardman) wrote:


>    This weekend I adopted an old Icom IC-211 2 meter all mode that needed a
>  new home (The original owner having bought one of those fancy new Kenwood
>  144/220/440 tribanders).  It seems to be a very solid older reg, with
>  very good intermod rejection, but it would be nice to also be able to
>  use it on a few of the local repeaters that require tones.  Is there
>  any easy and/or relatively inexpensive way to add PL tones to this
>  rig?

>  -Bob  KC5SFW

>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=
>|      Bob Boardman, UNM Cancer Research & Treatment Center, Albuquerque, NM
 |
>|                     internet: [e-mail]
 |
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=

I have a 211 and to solve the problem I added a Communication
Specialist TE-32 encoder. The front plate of the encoder has a rotary
dial with all tones listed, so no dip switches to set each time. It
works perfectly, five minutes to hook up, and I think about $50.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Douglas R Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco DJ-160
Date: 14 Mar 96 12:05:32 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I finally tried to use this radio for the first time last night and check in w
ith the local
ARES net. The net controller said I was not opening the repeater (15 miles). I
'm using
the EBP-10N which is 7.2 volts and gives me 0.2 watt out.

The manual says using the EBP-12N battery (12 volts) will give me 2 watts out
in
"Low" or 5 watts out in "High."

My question is: Can I use a 12 volt power supply and just connect that to the
DC "in"
jack. Wouldn't this allow my to transmit with the full 5 watts?

Also, I'm using a rubber duck antenna. The calculations I made for 147.585 (lo
cal
chat) for making a simply dipole is a piece of wire 38 inches long, fed 19" fr
om either
end. I have some #8 aluminum ground wire left over from grounding my Antron.
Would that be ok?

When feeding this wire does it make any difference how far the ground and cent
er
conductor are spaced apart? I mean where they are soldered to the aluminum wir
e?

Thanks,

Doug
KC8CGX


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:32 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Alinco DJ-160
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 17:44:41 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Douglas
 R Davis) writes:
>
>Also, I'm using a rubber duck antenna. The calculations I made for 147.585 (l
ocal
>chat) for making a simply dipole is a piece of wire 38 inches long, fed 19" f
rom either
>end. I have some #8 aluminum ground wire left over from grounding my Antron.
>Would that be ok?
>
>When feeding this wire does it make any difference how far the ground and cen
ter
>conductor are spaced apart? I mean where they are soldered to the aluminum wi
re?

Soldering aluminum is tricky, you need to tin it under oil first
before attempting to join it to the copper. This isn't too hard
with a chassis plate, but it is harder with a wire. Use clamps
instead, or try the antenna I'm going to describe below.

This antenna is called a coaxial sleeve dipole, and all you need
to make it is a length of coax. Take a length of coax and strip
off the outer jacket for about 19.5 inches from one end. Push back
on the braid to loosen it from the inner insulation (like Chinese
thumbcuffs). Now roll the braid back over the cable like a sock
so that you wind up with 19.5 inches of exposed inner conductor and
19 inches of braid extending back over the cable's outer jacket.
Strip about an inch of inner insulation off the end of the cable and
form the inner conductor into a loop. This is the antenna "mount",
hang it up using some string to any high point within convienent
reach. Put a connector on the other end of the cable and connect
it to your radio. You're done. It doesn't get much simpler than
this.

You may need to cut the outer insulation a bit further back than
19.5 inches in order to wind up with a "sleeve" 19 inches long
over the cable. This will vary a bit depending on the particular
cable you use. Feel free to experiment. Trim the exposed inner
for about 19 inches (or best VSWR if you care), if it winds up
too long. It will, the dielectric will electrically lengthen
it. One way to "shorten" the antenna for best VSWR is to just
start trimming off sections of inner insulation. This is better
than snipping the wire back because it maintains physical balance
of the antenna "elements".

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:34 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DX70 Experience
Date: 17 Mar 1996 05:35:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4ig8ae$[e-mail]>
References: <4idu72$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Raj Singh,, 403 275-8939,) wrote:
>Hi
>Raj here in Calgary, Alberta.  Anybody out ther have any experience with
>the Alinco DX70 mobile HF rig. Good, Bad or the Ugly - all experiences
>would be appreciated.
>Thanks
>Raj
>VE6RAJ
>

Good but not perfect IMHO.  I use mine for HF a lot more than 6m, so my commen
ts are
primarily about that part of the rig.  I like the receiver - it seems pretty s
ensitive,
pulling in signals from far away and making them sound very nice - even when h
ooked to
a base-loaded 54" whip (a mobile antenna) mounted at ground level in my living
 room.
The people I talk to report that my transmissions sound just fine, too.  I've
modified
mine for out-of-ham-band transmissions since I'm in Civil Air Patrol, and it w
orks well
on these frequencies, too.  YMMV, of course.

The thing I *don't* like about it is the PL encoder, which uses DIP switches o
n the
bottom of the rig (*ugh*).  My FM contacts report that the PL is audible, mean
ing that
the deviation is too high.  I don't have the service manual, so I'm not sure h
ow to
adjust it yet.  Of course, you only get 10W out on 6m, too - but that's what e
xternal
power amps are for.  I like mine very much, and consider it to be an excellent
 value.
73 de KB9JTT
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:35 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DX70 Experience
Date: 18 Mar 1996 04:18:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4iio6i$[e-mail]>
References: <4idu72$[e-mail]> <4ii211$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Martin Moerman) wrote, in reference to the Alinco DX-70
T:
>Well I bougth a new transeiver this weekend and it was the IC 706
>The diference between them was $300 so for that money i can't buy a 2m
>allmode rig..
>
>Good luck
>Martin.
>
>

Actually the difference is far more than $300.00.  I compared the IC 706 and t
he DX70T
and found the DX70T to fitm y needs far better.  The 2m side of the IC 706 is
incredibly
intermod-prone, making it virtually useless for me, since I live on a very hig
h hill in a
metro area, within four miles of literally dozens of repeaters.  In addition,
the IC 706's
2m side is not modifiable for MARS/CAP operation, which is very important to m
e, since I
am a Communications Officer in Civil Air Patrol.  For many, these drawbacks ar
en't
important, and for those people I'm sure the IC 706 is a fine rig - but it's n
ot for
everyone (what radio is?) and, alas, it's not for me.

73 de Will KB9JTT
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Raj Singh,, 403 275-8939,)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco DX70 Experience
Date: 16 Mar 1996 01:30:26 -0700
Message-ID: <4idu72$[e-mail]>

Hi
Raj here in Calgary, Alberta.  Anybody out ther have any experience with
the Alinco DX70 mobile HF rig. Good, Bad or the Ugly - all experiences
would be appreciated.
Thanks
Raj
VE6RAJ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:36 1996
From: "Philip Singley, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Antique amateur radio equipment
Date: 16 Mar 1996 13:17:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4ief17$[e-mail]>
To: news.netdoor.com

Looking for a source of antique amateur radio equipment - either Company
or individual.  Any help will be appreciated.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Dorn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Date: 18 Mar 1996 17:04:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4ik522$[e-mail]>

Hi,
  I am a relatively new Ham, and I still spend much of my time SWL as
well as Hamming. I am wondering from the broad array of rigs that offer
general coverage, if there are rigs that really pay attention to the
needs of the avid SWL. I am thinking particularly in the areas of
selection of AM bandwidth filters, and RX audio quality. If one had to
choose one rig to meet the needs of the SWL and Ham what would it be?
Interested in your opinions.
Thanks very much,
Chris VE6RDC



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (fallowsj)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 03:45:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4ilakf$[e-mail]>
References: <4ik522$[e-mail]>

In article <4ik522$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Chris
 Dorn) says:
>
>Hi,
>  I am a relatively new Ham, and I still spend much of my time SWL as
>well as Hamming. I am wondering from the broad array of rigs that offer
>general coverage, if there are rigs that really pay attention to the
>needs of the avid SWL. I am thinking particularly in the areas of
>selection of AM bandwidth filters, and RX audio quality. If one had to
>choose one rig to meet the needs of the SWL and Ham what would it be?
Hi Chris.  Darn good question.  I probably spend a lot more time SWLing
than Hamming (although I did not start out that way) and have the
same concerns.
Most of the ham/general coverage receivers have pathetic AM filters.
Often, it is just the roofing filter used
in the first (up conversion) IF.  If not, then it's usually too wide
(6Khz++ at -6db) and not deep enough (more than 15+Khz at -40 db, with
no deep skirt selectivity).  I am using an ICOM728 which, in addition to
the above AM selectivity specs, also sports poor audio (poorly designed
AM detector, poor audio output bandwidth which rolls off around 2kHz) etc.
Even the new Japan Radio JST-145 has a lousy AM filter.
I have looked at lots of specs and the better specs I have found are for
the Kenwood 850, which has an AM filter specified at 6/15Khz at -6/-60dB.
The more expensive Yaesu FT1000 runs 6/14Khz at -6/-60.  I have listened
to an FT1000 but was not overly impressed with the audio.  The new
Kenwood TS870S gives you DSP final IF at 11.3Khz with 9/12Khz AM
bandwidth -6/-60.  This looks good but I think the rig costs around
$5000 Canadian!

My suggestion is that if you can afford to, get a separate SWL receiver
optimized for AM.  Except for the TS870S, none of the newer ham rigs
seem to provide specs which compare with the Drake R8A (4/8 or 6/12 Khz
at -6/-60) or the Lowe HF250 4 and 7 Khz filters.  While I use the
ICOM 728 under computer control for monitoring, the tough work is done
by an old Racal RA-17 with a Timewave DSP-59+.  Cheers.  If you find
something that fits the bill for HAM/SWL, please let me know!   73


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT
Date: 13 Mar 1996 06:00:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5o9e$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail] <4gks9a$[e-mail]> <4gon7k$[e-mail]> <4hnu68$fd3@nnt <[e-mail]> <4i2i4e$[e-mail]>

Doug ([e-mail]) wrote:


: Nope, not mail fraud when using a common carrier, ie UPS/FEDEX.

: Recommend you contact them...last time I had a problem, UPS had an investiga
tor
: at the house the next day

: Doug
This beats the US Post Office - hands down.  All I got from the
US mail was a nice form letter.  Basically stating we don't have time
for little problems.  73  Robert


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (BOBBIJ EC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: BOATANCHOR NEWSGROUP?
Date: 17 Mar 1996 15:44:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BOBBIJ EC)

Is there a place on the net where boatanchors are offered for sale or
wanted to buy?
Thanx,

Bill


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Sorsby)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: BOATANCHOR NEWSGROUP?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 16:28:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4imnat$[e-mail]>
References: <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>

In article <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>Is there a place on the net where boatanchors are offered for sale or
>wanted to buy?
>Thanx,
>
>Bill


Yes,

There is the Boat Anchors e-mail list.  It is subscription only at a cost of
$12 per year.  Newcomers can get a free trial subscription for three weeks.

To subscribe send an e-mail message to [e-mail].  Leave the
subject blank and type the following in the first message line:

subscribe boatanchors your_name


Regards,
Bill Sorsby, N5BU



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Kilgore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: BOATANCHOR NEWSGROUP?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 22:05:59 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4inb47$[e-mail]>
References: <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>

In article <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (BOBBIJ EC) wr
ites:
|> Is there a place on the net where boatanchors are offered for sale or
|> wanted to buy?
|> Thanx,
|>
|> Bill

Bill,

There is a boatanchors mailing list, which includes not only postings of
boatanchors, but a lot of boatanchor expertise as well. If you are into
boatanchors at all, you should check it out. You can subscribe by sending
e-mail to [e-mail]. Leave the subject line blank and enter the
following in the body:

subscribe boatanchors <your_email_address>

There is a $12.00 annual charge, and IMHO it is a bargain. There is a free
three-week trial period to check it.

73,
Jeff, KC1MK


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael Van Meter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Cable Schematic for connecting MFJ 1270b to KW TR-2600A
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 05:00:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4io3g9$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Anyone have a schematic for connecting a MFJ-1270B TNC to a Kenwood
TR-2600A Handie-Talkie? It would be greatly appreciated - My first
attempt to get on packet!
        Live Life Lovingly!
        Michael Van Meter
        DE KE7YE
        Live Life Lovingly!
        Michael Van Meter



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:44 1996
From: Garth Wiscombe <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: calling all htx-100 users..calling all.....
Date: 13 Mar 1996 03:39:20 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i5g18$jsc@newsNewSnews>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]



--
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>Hello there I just picked up a HTX -100 and I had a couple of questions.

>
>1. Are the leds supposed to light up on transmit as well as recieve?
>
My owner manual says "Five LEDs function as an RF Power meter to indicate
the relative transmission output power in the transmission mode, and as a
signal meter to indicate the relative strength of the received signal in
the reception mode.
>
>2. How do you measure the SWR with this radio, the meter I have wants to
>measure AM signal strength, and when I select CW from the mode button, and
>depress the ppt or the trans switch, nothing moves on the scale...?
>How do I measure the SWR?
>
I set mine up in the cw mode and use the TX/RX switch set to TX to send a
carrier that the meter can read (external SWR Meter).

I hope this helps...
>Thanks for all the help in advance,
>Jason  N1RWY   FN54VF

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                              *   *    *   *   *
Garth Wiscombe, KA7MHN   /\  /\ *    *   /  /    /  Office   801 265-5057
Salt Lake City          /  \/  \ /\     ----/\---   Cellular 801 631-8675
Utah  84119-6032       /\   \   \  \   /  / || /    Home     801 967-3236
USA                   /  \   \   \  \       ||      FAX      [phone]
                     /    \   \   \  \      ||    E-mail  [e-mail]
                             73 de Garth KA7MHN

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Curt Phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Can 50W HF destroy a TV?
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 22:27:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4iq0c3$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>I live in an apartment and have a folded dipole running around the ceiling.
>My radio is a TS-820 capable of 100W.
>I've heard that running 50-100W in close proximity of TV's can
>damage them.
>Anybody have any facts/stories along these lines?

  Well, I have a sad story to relate, and I'm embarrassed about it
because I'm an Extra Class ham, have been licensed since 1968 and
am an engineer (albeit mechanical, so I'm not quite as embarrassed
as if I were an EE!).

  In my shack/office/computer room I had a 1984 vintage 13" Zenith
TV using rabbit ears (I'm at war with my incompetent cable company...
sorry, "incompetent" and "cable company" is redundant, but that's
another story).  I have a couple of outside antennas for 2 meters, but
during thunderstorms I don't want them connected (for obvious reasons).
Yet, I try to participate in Skywarn... so I built a 2-meter J-pole, and
put it in the corner of the room.  Ah, in this case, the "corner of the
room" was about 5 feet away from the TV rabbit ears.
  The J-pole did a good job on most of the local repeaters, so
ultimately laziness took its toll and I left my 25 watt Icom IC-25A
connected to it almost all the time.

  I noticed that when I transmitted the TV picture would "scramble",
but in a world-class case of brain-lock it didn't occur to me that it
was roasting the TV tuner.  Ultimately, the reception on the VHF got
progressively worse, even though I'm literally line-of-sight from the
two primary VHF stations in this area.  Investigation (confirmed by
a electronics tech friend) showed that the VHF tuner was shot.

  THEN it suddenly occurred to me that the proximity of the two
antennas might have been a bad idea!  So, wiser but poorer now,
I learned that 5 feet of horizontal separation is NOT enough for
a 25 watt transmitting antenna and a receiving antenna.

  So, even though your application is HF, you are also considering
2x-4x the power... be careful.

========= Opinions expressed are solely those of the author ==========
Curt Phillips, CEM KD4YU (ex-WB4LHI)|  "Computer users will need a
Chairman, Tar Heel Scanner/SWL Group|  mouse when they grow a
ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh ARS; NRA   |  third arm." -Pres of WordStar
Energy/Recycling BBS 704-547-3114   |                   circa 1983
== [e-mail] == [e-mail] ==




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:47 1996
From: "William M. Bickley" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Central New Jersey Hamfest!
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 22:29:47 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

HAMFEST! - New Jersey (Trenton) - Delaware Valley Radio Association.  Sunday,
March 24th - rain or shine.  Vendor setup 6:30am; public 7:30am to 2:00pm.
Trenton State College Student Recreation Center - Route 31 approx. 1 mile
south of I-95/Route 31 exit.  Admission $5.00; Tailgaters $10.00 (includes
space and admission);  Inside Vendors $20.00 (includes space and admission).
 Free parking; refreshments; handicapped accessible.  Talk-in 146.67 and
442.650.  For info, call DVRA hotline at [phone].


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Wbickle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Central NJ Hamfest - 3/24/95
Date: 18 Mar 1996 14:28:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4ikdgv$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Wbickle)

HAMFEST! - New Jersey (Trenton) - Delaware Valley Radio Association.
Sunday, March 24th - rain or shine.  Vendor setup 6:30am; public 7:30am to
2:00pm.  Trenton State College Student Recreation Center - Route 31
approx. 1 mile south of I-95/Route 31 exit.  Admission $5.00; Tailgaters
$10.00 (includes space and admission);  Inside Vendors $20.00 (includes
space and admission).  Free parking; refreshments; handicapped accessible.
 Talk-in 146.67 and 442.650.  For info, call DVRA hotline at (609)
882-2240.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Sipe)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Coax specs?
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 20:54:19 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>


>
>
> NEK Cable type RG 62 AWG 22 Flourofoam power limited cable class 2, 200
> degrees C Also Classified as to fire and smoke characteristics only NEC
> 725-2(b) *9*
>

RG-62 was used a lot for ARCNET LAN cabling. It's 93 ohm cable.

----
73  David   KD6QFZ
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Raymond Sarrio)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Compare Rig Prices TODAY-->http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html
Date: 13 Mar 1996 20:39:23 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

The Raymond Sarrio Company's Ham Radio WWW site is proud to announce a
FREE Ham Radio classified advertising page at
http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html.

This new classified section will allow Hams to search for equipement with
the help of a search engine--no need to scroll through 100's of listing
before you find that special piece of gear. Plus, when you find the gear
your interested in, each listing comes with point-and-click e-mail access,
direct to the Ham that listed the item.

For those Hams with gear to sell, take note! It is absolutely FREE to list
your equipment within Ham Classifieds, and there will be no posting time
delays.  Your posting will go on-line, in our classified search engine,
immediately. All you need do is fill out a simple forms page, and upon its
(point-and-click) submission, your "For Sale" advertisement is on-line
within 1 hour. I will be purging the classified listing initially about
once every month, but that timeline will shorten as our classified numbers
go up. Give it a try, and let me know how you like it. 73's Ray
--
The Raymond Sarrio Co. a full feature Ham Radio Storefront on tth WWW at http:
//www.csz.com/sarrio in association with Brillar Enterprises http://win-win.co
m/brillar an Extensive Discount CD-Rom Catalog!



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert J. Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Diplexor for HF and 6 Meters
Date: 18 Mar 96 10:35:57 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960318053306.24067B-100000@DGS>
References: <[e-mail]>


  In order to split the HF / 6-m signals from the common coax connector
on the IC-706, and many similar rigs, buy the CF-360 from Comet.  It has
essentially no loss, and claims to handle 500 W.  Costs about $70.  There
are two versions, which differ only in which ports have male or female
connectors.
        73 de Bob  [e-mail]





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:52 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Donations of 2-meter Rigs Needed.
Date: 17 Mar 1996 22:48:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4ii4rh$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Keywords: Donations, 2 - Meters

We need about twelve 2-meter transceivers for use on the Island County (Washin
gton State)
ARES/RACES emergency service packet network that is under construction. We can
 use 10 watt or better
rigs that are crystal controlled and do not have the sub-audible tone capabili
ty as well, of course, as the
newer xmtrs.  Donations of equipment for this purpose gladly accepted. I'll pe
rsonally pick up in the Pugent
Sound and surrounding communities.

Many Thanks and 73's

Ron Short
[e-mail]





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay B)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Donations of 2-meter Rigs Needed.
Date: 17 Mar 1996 18:14:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4ii6c4$[e-mail]>
References: <4ii4rh$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay B)

i have a similar sob story, donate some radios my way too.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Charles R. Van Buskirk)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: drake or galaxy
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 10:34:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4i68bn$[e-mail]>

need a power supply for one or both of these units if you have one or both or
know where I could aquire one please let me know..For my father. If you need a

call sign let me know and I will supply one


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:54 1996
From: Paul Christensen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Dust in the FT-1000
Date: 15 Mar 1996 13:52:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4ibsmf$[e-mail]>
References: <4i8qip$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

You might want to talk with Chip Margelli at Yaesu: [phone] ext.
243.  He's the man to get to the bottom line on this.

-Paul, N9AZ



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rval58)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Dust in the FT-1000
Date: 14 Mar 1996 04:57:45 -0500
Message-ID: <4i8qip$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rval58)

Has anyone ever had to remove dust buildup from behind the main display
window of the FT-1000?  I have alot of dust build up there which won't
sufficiently blow out w/forced air. Need to "get to it".  Looks tricky.
Wondering if anyone has done it, and how?


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:56 1996
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: experience with PatComm 16000?
Date: 20 Mar 1996 17:00:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4ipdiv$[e-mail]>

Hello all,

I should like to know if the PatComm 16000 transceiver, as advertized
in CQ has actually been delivered and what the radio is like.

thank you
73, Moritz DL5UH



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FCC-Out of Control??? Please Read
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 08:31:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4ij7at$[e-mail]>
References: <9603161949.AA21570@imlad>

   [e-mail] (Mike Aust) wrote:
>
>THis is an equipment forum , not a political forum
>but I will say this. When the FCC gives you a license,
>it is granting you a prelivege, not a right.

What's worse is that even the grant of privelage is illegitimate.
Congress can empower the F.C.C. and pass all the laws it wants, but
neither of them own the frequencies.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Aust)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FCC-Out of Control??? Please Read
Date: 16 Mar 96 19:49:09 GMT
Message-ID: <9603161949.AA21570@imlad>


THis is an equipment forum , not a political forum
but I will say this. When the FCC gives you a license,
it is granting you a prelivege, not a right. This twist
the language and say prelivege=right is a liberal
interpretation, usually not the original intent of the
law.
 73
mike



Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 09:13:05 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Rick Eutsler)
Subject: FCC-Out of Control??? Please Read

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: RICHARD D. EUTSLER, SR.
March 11, 1996
Liberty News Service - 802-485-4170


F.C.C. Refuses to License Low Power Broadcasters

Radio Police Raid Small Broadcaster Instead


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:50:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Final Tubes: 6146 vs. S2001
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 07:35:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5u3a$[e-mail]>
References: <4i4mmt$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Joe Dubner) wrote:

>My Kenwood TS-820S came with a pair of S2001 tubes in the final.
>They look suspiciously like 6146s.  What's the difference -- anyone
>know?

The only difference is that the S2001 was made in Japan.  BTW, I think
they're actually the equivalent of the 6146B.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Dubner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Final Tubes: 6146 vs. S2001
Date: 15 Mar 1996 20:25:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4icjog$[e-mail]>
References: <4i4mmt$[e-mail]>

Earlier I wrote:
: My Kenwood TS-820S came with a pair of S2001 tubes in the final.  They
: look suspiciously like 6146s.  What's the difference -- anyone know?

Thanks to all who replied.  The general opinion was that they were
more-or-less equivalent, depending on which 6146 (6146A, 6146B, or
6146W) one was comparing to.  Some pointed out minor differences in base
size and perhaps plate dissipation.

The definitive response came from Itaru Okada, JF2NXS / N7UVV,
[e-mail], who wrote me:

  The differences between 6146 and S2001, which I know, are the heater
  current and the maximum surface temprerature.  So you cannot use
  them together in the case of series  heater circuit.

  The permitted maximum surface temperature of 6146 is 260 degree C,
  and that of S2001 is 220 degree C ( data from the Yaesu musen
  journal, No.1).   S2001 is japanese copy of 6146, and was made by
  Matsushita (Panasonic).

Thanks again to one and all.

73,
Joe, K7JD

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Dubner   K7JD  |  Hewlett-Packard Company  |  [e-mail]
                   |  24001 E. Mission Avenue  |
                   |  Liberty Lake, WA  99019  |  [phone]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Claude Frantz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Final Tubes: 6146 vs. S2001
Date: 15 Mar 96 08:28:49 GMT
Message-ID: <claude.826878529@bauv111>
References: <4i4mmt$[e-mail]> <4i5u3a$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:

>   [e-mail] (Joe Dubner) wrote:

>>My Kenwood TS-820S came with a pair of S2001 tubes in the final.
>>They look suspiciously like 6146s.  What's the difference -- anyone
>>know?

>The only difference is that the S2001 was made in Japan.  BTW, I think
>they're actually the equivalent of the 6146B.

If I remember well, it is like the 6146A.
--
Claude
([e-mail])
The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer
and not necessarily those of her employer.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:02 1996
From: "dave . n7da" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.ham-radio.swap
Subject: For Sale: ICOM IF Filters for IC-735
Date: 19 Mar 1996 17:13:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4impvf$[e-mail]>

For Sale:

   FL-32A  500hz  $75.00

   FL-63A  250hz  $75.00


tnx, dave.n7da





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:03 1996
From: Douglas Rand <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: For sale: Kenwood 7930 and packet modem
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 15:02:11 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have a 7930 (2m, 25W) mobile rig for sale.  Everything
is clean,  the only problem is that it can be intermittent
on 25W.  Is is very reliable on 5W out.  Complete with
mobile mount.  Asking $120,  make a reasonable offer.

I also have a lowend packet modem for sale.  1200 baud.  I
also have the cables to connect the two together for a packet
station.  This worked fairly well.  Asking $50 for the modem.

Doug (KC1KJ)
--
Doug Rand <[e-mail]>       (508) 567 - 2217
Silicon Graphics                http://reality.sgi.com/employees/drand
Digital Media Systems           User Interface Technology
Disclaimer: These are my views,  SGI's views are in 3D


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:04 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: For Trade Pro-26 Scanner
Date: 13 Mar 1996 19:55:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4i796l$[e-mail]>

I have Pro-26 Hand Scanner that I'd like to trade. It cover 25-1300 Mz and has
 200 channels. It's like
new  with the manual and box. I'm looking to trade it for a used dual-band HT
or new 2-meter HT.
Kenwwod, Icom, Yaesu or Standard only. Thanks Steve KF4FIO



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:05 1996
From: Dave Bremer <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: FR-146 FM Receiver Kit
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 14:20:55 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

My partner and I are using the Ramsey FR-146 2-Meter FM receiver kit to
receive data broadcast at a frequency of 155.445 MHz.  The data is sent
with a 6 second delay between each new message.  We are having trouble
squelching out the noise during the 6 second delay period.  The squelch
seems to either cut out nothing or it cuts out everything including the
data being broadcast.  If anyone has any information regarding this kit
or where we could receive help, we would appreciate hearing about it.
Please e-mail any comments or suggestions.

Thanks.

Dave Bremer
St. Cloud State University
Electrical Engineering
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:07 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS   --   KOSS  PRO  4/AA  HEADPHONES
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: Bill <[e-mail]>
Date: 14 Mar 96 17:08:35 CST

          ::::::::::::::::::   KOSS  PRO 4/AA   ::::::::::::::::::
                                Stereophones


Rugged, professional quality featuring:


        *    1" voice coil
        *    Foam-filled Pneumalite earcushions
        *    Has screw-on mounting for adding boom mic
        *    230 Ohms


These headphones are in MINT condition.
No scratches, no dings, and no stains.
Earcushions have been replaced and are brand new.

Suggested retail price (new):                                   $99.95
Recent discount price (J&R Music World, 1-800-221-8180):        $89.95

My price:    $30 + I pay shipping


Bill Worthington
Lawrence, Kansas, USA



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:08 1996
From: Hank <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS FT-2500M
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:07:44 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Selling FT-2500M for a friend.  New last August.  All boxes,books etc.
$260.  73 Hank


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (TLifland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS Mint Yeasu FT-736R
Date: 13 Mar 1996 19:46:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4i7q8s$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TLifland)

Have a mint Yeasu FT-736R with FT-8 Tone Unit installed.  2Mtr and 450
modules.
$1,450.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:09 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: fs TS 140s
Date: 21 Mar 1996 03:02:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4iqgst$[e-mail]>

FS TS140s mint. Used as back up  . very little air time. have manual mic cable
s and box.
will pay shipping  700 or best offer.
email me at [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (TLifland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS-MINT YEASU FT-736R
Date: 16 Mar 1996 06:38:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4ie987$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TLifland)

SELL MINT YEASU FT-736R WITH FTS-8 TONE ENCODER/DECODER BOARD AND MH-1
MICROPHONE.  ORIGINAL WARRANTY (HAS NEVER BEEN REGISTERED) $1,450.

TOM - W2RFU


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (James W Beckett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS-Swap Drake 1824 TVRO
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:53:48 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

FS- or Swap:

Drake 1824 TVRO system- C and Ku- Corotor II+
Orbitron SX-10 and special low 5.5' mount.
(Bolts to ground mount plate).

I live at Corning in Western NY. It would
be impractical for me to ship the dish- so
it would have to be picked up. Although
disasembling it is easy and it retains the
proper settings- boxing it for UPS would be
a real pain.

In winter it works fine but in summer some
trees block out the very Sats I want.

I am interested in a Drake R8-A receiver or will
entertain cash offers.

Jim
KD2KU





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:  Bencher Iambic CW paddles
Date: 19 Mar 1996 17:52:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4ims8a$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have for sale a very nice set of
Bencher Iambic CW Paddles.  It is in
new condition with original box.
$45

email if interested
[e-mail]

michael




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Selman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: 800 Mhz Motorola Trasnceiver and accessories
Date: 15 Mar 1996 03:20:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4ianm8$[e-mail]>

I have several 800 Mhz Motorola radios with mics, antennas, base or
mobile configuration.   These are like new and are cleared and
program-able.

If interested please e-mail [e-mail]

WE6A


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Collins)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Autodialer, SONY
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:19:09 PST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have a very nice Sony PDS-110 Intelligent Autodialer. Originally paid $87
for it  3.5 years ago. I haven't used it for the last 2 years.
Features:
110 number memory
Memo function
Calculator
Edit functions (that work nicely, don't have to erase whole number)
6 quick-access memory keys
Special Service Code key for credit card calls (this is why I bought this one)
Password security
Redial
Local function
2.5" x 4.365" x 1/2 "

Best offer over $25


JC

   Jim Collins, Seattle, Washington
   e-mail: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:14 1996
From: Ron N8LMT
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Kenwood TS-780 All-Mode VHF/UHF 00
Date: 13 Mar 1996 20:44:26 -0800
Message-ID: <4i887a$[e-mail]>

mint condition, original box, mc-42s 8pin hand-mic, manual, ac & dc power
cables.. $600.
email [e-mail]   or   ph 810-679-3535
73, tnx


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:15 1996
From: Wendy <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap;,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Satillite equipment
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 10:06:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello All

i have an AEA st-1 satilitte tracker asking $300.00 which includes all
the cables which were not included when new.

Also i have a Yaesu G5400b azimuth & elevation rotor with the seperation
kit. Asking $450.00.

these items are in excellent condition.

If you are interested let me know.

73
John << N2OJY >>


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carlos Ramirez)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:10 meter AMP
Date: 15 Mar 1996 07:47:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4ib79m$[e-mail]>

Puts out 175 watts PEP, has a preamp build in. $100.
73's
Carlos


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:17 1996
From: Judhi Prasetyo <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-5200 Yaesu Modification
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:38:55 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i796l$[e-mail]>

>>From: "G4KFK@GB7WIR" <[e-mail]>
>>Date: 1996/01/30
>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] "Joe
>>Simpson" writes:

>> Just got my FT-5200 back from Yaesu repair, and receive is  now
>> limited to 144-148.  I used to have it opened up to get the weather
>> service freqs, but I don't remember how I did it.  Anybody know what
>> the key sequence is for this mod?[deleted]
>"Please make jumper on the INTERFACE unit as following which
> jumper are freeband for the FT-5200 and it should be need
> programming frequency.
>
> On the interface unit jumper position JP5001-JP5007 as
> following:
>
> JP5001, JP5002, JP5003, JP5006 and JP5007 ..... Short
> JP5004 and JP5005 ............................. Open
>
> Please note: Free band frequency range are approx following.
>
> For VHF:   RX 110 - 180 MHz  TX 130 - 180 MHz
> For UHF:   RX 330 - 480 MHz  TX 425 - 465 MHz

> Programming Frequency:
> ----------------------

> Please push and keep "D/MR", "F/W" and "REV" button while
> power switch on. Now programming frequency for VHF low edge
> of RX, high edge of RX, low edge of TX and high edge of TX,
> then UHF frequency programming same as low edge of RX, high
> edge of RX ... high edge of TX"

>So now you know!  :-)

>73
>Mike
>G4KFK

It's not work on my rig (5200 USA version).
Bad luck, after I entered the code then it's LOCKED !!
The POWER, BAND, and other buttons cant work anymore.
So, I even cant turn off my rig by pushing POWER button.
I have try to push RESET button, but still can't work.

I still can dial and transmit the main freq. but can't swap
between main (now UHF) and sub freq.

If somebody kbow how to solve this problem, I'll be very happy.

BTW: I only found JP4001 to 4005 inside the interface module.
They jumperred by diodes.

Thanks

- judhi



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Keeton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT530 Mod-Extended Tx didn't work
Date: 16 Mar 1996 18:07:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4if014$[e-mail]>
References: <4i9s83$[e-mail]>

I just bought my ft-530.. I did the green wire mod... I worked fine.. I got
extended UFH and it claimed 800-950.. But I put it next to a scanner and the
radio  didn't pick up the signals the scanner did. But...
That night the memory got erased and now I have 110-174 rx 144-148 tx and norm
al
UHF stuff.. I went back into it and chacked pad 13 and the resister (0 ohm) on

pad 15.. Both were fine..
I tried the up & down arrow thing again. (several times) and holding MR and VF
O
while turning it on..

Somebody said that this mod toggled.. Is this true? Did I un-toggle it?
If so can I turn it back on??
Thanks...

John Keeton
KB0VEH
[e-mail]
http://www.umr.edu/~keeton


Michael Parkin ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I made the jumperpad 13 mod on my FT530, originally purchased
: March 1993.  The extended Rx worked but the extended Tx was only
: to 450 not the 461 or 470MHz that was advertised.  Any help on this?

: Thanks, Mike (KN6AN)




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael Parkin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT530 Mod-Extended Tx didn't work
Date: 14 Mar 1996 19:32:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4i9s83$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Keywords: FT530

I made the jumperpad 13 mod on my FT530, originally purchased
March 1993.  The extended Rx worked but the extended Tx was only
to 450 not the 461 or 470MHz that was advertised.  Any help on this?

Thanks, Mike (KN6AN)




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Skjerve)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT530 Mod-Extended Tx didn't work
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 03:29:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4ianld$[e-mail]>
References: <4i9s83$[e-mail]>

Did you reset the CPU? Hold down the Mhz up and down button and turn
on power and then it should work, also, this will erase you memory's,
so write them down first!

[e-mail] (Michael Parkin) wrote:

>I made the jumperpad 13 mod on my FT530, originally purchased
>March 1993.  The extended Rx worked but the extended Tx was only
>to 450 not the 461 or 470MHz that was advertised.  Any help on this?

>Thanks, Mike (KN6AN)






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:23 1996
From: "Dennis R. Baumgarte" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GAP Voyager DX antenna
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 20:31:53 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: 34, Minisink, Ave, Port, Jervis, NY, 12771

I have been useing one for three years and have 180 countries worked.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:24 1996
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GAP Voyager DX vertical antenna.
Date: 15 Mar 1996 08:55:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4ibb9q$[e-mail]>
References: <4i2h8i$[e-mail]>

In article <4i2h8i$[e-mail]>,
Vince Fiscus,  KB7ADL <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>Is the GAP Voyager DX a good vertical ?

Well, it depends what you call a good vertical.

it is quite expensive and looks impressive, However, performance
is similar to a dummy load. It is easily beat by a dipole at the same
height.

A good vertical comes with a ground plane.

73, Moritz DL5UH



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:24 1996
From: Ken Smith <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Gauss meters
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:25:10 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Safe Technologies Corporation, which markets gauss
meters and Ultra-low radiation computer monitors, is
now on the World Wide Web at
http:/www.milligauss.com


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:25 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: Bill <[e-mail]>
Date: 12 Mar 96 16:48:18 CST
References: <4hicb4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

I picked up a set of KOSS PRO/4AA headphones at a garage sale, and would
like a few opinions on how these would work for ham use.

73s

Bill
AA4FM/0
Eudora, Kansas, USA



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed Burress)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Good set of headphones
Date: 15 Mar 1996 09:19:26 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i7coh$[e-mail]>

In article <4i7coh$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (WB
3U) writes:
>   Bill <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>I picked up a set of KOSS PRO/4AA headphones at a garage sale, and
>>would like a few opinions on how these would work for ham use.
>
>If I remember correctly, those were low impedance (8 ohms?) phones
>with fairly large driver assemblies.  The latter is exactly what's
>needed to withstand the rigors of ham radio.  Unfortunately, I think
>they were also about the same weight as an '89 Hyundai.
>
>Try wearing them for an hour, then measure your height.  If you
>haven't lost half an inch, I'm thinking of a different model.  ;)
>
>73,
>Jack  WB3U

They are heavy, but I use them for my setup, and prefer them to the lighter
weight headsets because the also function as a set of hearing protectors,
doing an excellent job of cutting down background noise.  I used to use them
for listening to the stereo, so I guess I got used to them.  What I would
like to know is if there is a matching microphone assembly that can be
purchased either new or used (anybody got one they would like to sell?)
There is a removeable aluminum finger nut on one of the earphone shells that
looks like it was designed for that purpose.

Thanks,
Ed Burress
KC7GFX




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott Saloway)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 13 Mar 1996 20:34:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7bhi$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

James Moore ([e-mail]) wrote:

:       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

:       GrandMother wants rid of it.

:       If interested call 1 800 996-2971

:       Thank You


        Well...what stuff?

                        --Scott--


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (PhilRut1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 12 Mar 1996 15:58:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4i4ogp$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>



  You've got to give a bit of a hint, I'm afraid....


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clair Robinson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 13 Mar 1996 08:15:15 -0600
Message-ID: <4i6l9j$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

James Moore ([e-mail]) wrote:

:       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

:       GrandMother wants rid of it.

:       If interested call 1 800 996-2971

:       Thank You


Could you at least tell us what state its in?


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dick Hughes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 01:24:37 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (James Moore) wrote:

>
>       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
>
>       GrandMother wants rid of it.
>
>       If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>
>       Thank You
>

I noticed this same post in rec.motorcycles.  Must have a lot of
stuff!  I think he is playing with us.

Dick Hughes


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Kehler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 13 Mar 1996 16:36:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6thl$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

James Moore ([e-mail]) wrote:

:       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

:       GrandMother wants rid of it.

:       If interested call 1 800 996-2971

:       Thank You

James,
     Sorry to hear about your Grand Dad.
Regards,
Jim KH2D




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:32 1996
From: Dave Heil <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 21:50:02 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Jack Harper wrote:
>
> In article <4i49qb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (James
> Moore) wrote:
>
> >         GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
> >
> >         GrandMother wants rid of it.
> >
> >         If interested call 1 800 996-2971
> >
> >         Thank You
>

Yep,  Give old Grandma a buzz on her handy toll-free number.  This is a
limited time offer so call today!

Dave OH2/K8MN


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jack Harper)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:35:15 +1100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

In article <4i49qb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (James
Moore) wrote:

>         GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
>
>         GrandMother wants rid of it.
>
>         If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>
>         Thank You

Could you be a little more specific for the edification and enlightenment
of us all...

A list, however general, would be useful...

Where is said garage located (Pittsburg?)?

Thank You...

Jack, KC0LR

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Harper                             Bank Systems 2000, Inc.
e-mail: [e-mail]              350 Indiana Street, Suite 350
voice:  303-277-1892 fax: [phone]  Golden, Colorado 80401 USA

                 "21st Century Banking Applications"
                Private Label Optical Bank Card Systems
            Visit our Web Page: http://www.bs2000.com/talos
---------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Sean McCarthy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 13 Mar 1996 02:29:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5btf$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

In article <4i49qb$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (James Moore) wrote:
>
>       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
>
>       GrandMother wants rid of it.
>
>       If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>
>       Thank You
>

Does this reek of spam or what!

Sean


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ken Hamer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 11:18:18 PST
Message-ID: <4iho7o$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

> In article <4i49qb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(James Moore) wrote:
>
> >         GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
> >
> >         GrandMother wants rid of it.
> >
> >         If interested call 1 800 996-2971
> >
> >         Thank You

Out of curiousity, to find out just what the scam was, I called the
number.  However, it is out of service.  Bizarre!




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:36 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 23:28:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4ii02u$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4iho7o$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Ken Hamer) wrote:

>> In article <4i49qb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
>(James Moore) wrote:
>>

>> >         If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>> >
>> >         Thank You

>Out of curiousity, to find out just what the scam was, I called the
>number.  However, it is out of service.  Bizarre!


The death of a loved one, particularly a member of the plant family
can really mess up one's mind.  BUT...he sure generated a bunch of
bandwidth.   {$->

cdn





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:36 1996
From: John Wilcox/NS1Z <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 18:31:42 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <4ig8r8$[e-mail]>

When I called this one today, Grandma had apparently had it disconnected.
So much for the bargains, guess they were all snapped up......
--
John Wilcox / NS1Z
INTERNET :204.117.6.48
          [e-mail]
Work     :[e-mail]
TCP/IP   :44.118.6.4
          [e-mail]
AX-25    :[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Minger)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 15 Mar 1996 05:51:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4ib0gh$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]> <4iabe2$[e-mail]>

In article <4iabe2$[e-mail]>,
Ted Culin <[e-mail]> wrote:
>[e-mail] (James Moore) wrote:


>> GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

>> GrandMother wants rid of it.

>> If interested call 1 800 996-2971

>> Thank You

>Well at least he could have put a good phone number on his posting.
>Number is not in service.

Doesn't work from S. Calif either.  It is possible that it works
locally someplace.  Not all 800 numbers are nation-wide.  Some of
them are re-used several times in different markets.

I haven't seen any follow-up posts from James Moore, either.
Is this some sort of sophomoric "humor"?
Good grief! look at all those newsgroups!

-John
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Minger <[e-mail]>  Interests: Genealogy, Amateur Radio
 KE6DTC@K6VE.#SOCA.CA.USA.NOAM, TCP/IP: 44.16.1.240 - ke6dtc.ampr.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 17 Mar 1996 23:27:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4iion4$[e-mail]>
References: <4ii02u$[e-mail]>

In article <4ii02u$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] writes:

>
>The death of a loved one, particularly a member of the plant family
>can really mess up one's mind.  BUT...he sure generated a bunch of
>bandwidth.   {$->

It's too late, I called and bought it all. 73 Tom


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 17 Mar 1996 23:33:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4iip2o$[e-mail]>
References: <4ii02u$[e-mail]>

In article <4ii02u$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] writes:

>
>The death of a loved one, particularly a member of the plant family
>can really mess up one's mind.  BUT...he sure generated a bunch of
>bandwidth.   {$->
>
>cdn

It's too late. I bought it all already.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:42 1996
From: Burt Fisher <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 06:07:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>

James Moore wrote:
>
>         GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.
>
>         GrandMother wants rid of it.
>
>         If interested call 1 800 996-2971
>
>         Thank You

Thanks for all the detail.

#================#=====================================================#
|  Burt Fisher   |  Teacher of video, broadcasting and electronics     |
| Amateur call   |         South Dennis, Ma. (Cape Cod)                |
|    K1OIK       |  If you sit on the fence, it is a pain in the butt  |
#================#=====================================================#
|                           [e-mail]                           |
#======================================================================#
You cannot build a reputation on what you are going to do.
Henry Ford


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ted Culin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:51:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4iabe2$[e-mail]>
References: <4i49qb$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (James Moore) wrote:


>       GrandFather passed and left 2 garages full of stuff.

>       GrandMother wants rid of it.

>       If interested call 1 800 996-2971

>       Thank You

Well at least he could have put a good phone number on his posting.
Number is not in service.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (PhilRut1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GrandFather left 2 Garages full of Stuff
Date: 14 Mar 1996 22:39:42 -0500
Message-ID: <4iaopu$[e-mail]>
References: <4iabe2$[e-mail]>

In article <4iabe2$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Ted
Culin) writes:

>Well at least he could have put a good phone number on his posting.
>Number is not in service.

 Sounds like a hoax, forget it!!


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay Maynard, K5ZC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.info,rec.answers,news.answers
Subject: Guide to the Personal Radio Newsgroups
Date: 16 Mar 1996 07:05:20 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <radio/[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay Maynard, K5ZC)
Summary: This article provides an overview of the newsgroups devoted
Keywords: faq radio amateur ham cb netiquette

Posted-By: auto-faq 3.1.1.2
Archive-name: radio/personal-intro
Revision: 2.1 1994/11/01 03:50:23
Posting-Frequency: posted on the 15th of each month

This message describes the rec.radio.amateur.*, rec.radio.cb,
rec.radio.info, and rec.radio.swap newsgroups, as well as their Internet
mailing list counterparts and complements. It is intended to serve as a
guide for the new reader on what to find where. Questions and comments may
be directed to the author, Jay Maynard, K5ZC, by Internet electronic mail at
[e-mail]. This message was last changed on 31 October
1994 to add the discussion of non-Usenet mailing lists and streamline most
of the history discussion, and to change the moderator information for
rec.radio.info.

History
=======

Way back when, before there was a Usenet, the Internet hosted a mailing list
for hams, called (appropriately enough) INFO-HAMS. Ham radio discussions
were held on the mailing list, and sent to the mailboxes of those who had
signed up for it. When the Usenet software was created, and net news as we
now know it was developed, a newsgroup was created for hams: net.ham-radio.
The mailing list and the newsgroup were gatewayed together, eventually.

Over the years, as the net grew, the volume of discussion became
progressively higher. First one by one, and then as part of two
reorganizations, what was once one group became many. In the process,
developments elsewhere on the net were reflected in the groups as they were
created, most notably the change to place all of the ham radio groups in one
hierarchy.

The collection of newsgroups continues to grow as more people join the net,
and as more topics of discussion gain volume, I expect to see more groups be
created as well. This follows what is happening on the rest of the net.

Nearly all of the radio newsgroups have corresponding mailing lists, the
notable exception being rec.radio.swap. There are also a few mailing lists
that don't have newsgroups.

The Current Groups
==================

It's important to post messages to the group that's appropriate for them,
and not to the groups that aren't. The whole idea of having different
newsgroups is so that folks who aren't interested in, say, homebrewing,
don't have to wade through messages about homebrewing on the way to read
about Field Day. Posting appropriately is just good etiquette.

The rec.radio.amateur.misc group is the catchall. It is what rec.ham-radio
was renamed to during the first major reorganization. Any message that's not
more appropriate in one of the other groups belongs here, from contesting to
DX to ragchewing on VHF to information on becoming a ham.

The group rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc is for discussions related to
(surprise!) digital amateur radio. This doesn't have to be the common
two-meter AX.25 variety of packet radio, either; some of the most
knowledgeable folks in radio digital communications can be found here, and
anything in the general area is welcome. The name was changed to emphasize
this, and to encourage discussion not only of other text-based digital
modes, such as AMTOR, RTTY, and Clover, but things like digital voice and
video as well. The former group, rec.radio.amateur.packet, was removed on
September 21st, 1993. It is obsolete, and you should use .digital.misc
instead (or the appropriate new mailing list, mentioned below).  The group
has .misc as part of the name to allow further specialization if the users
wish it, such as .digital.tcp-ip.

The swap group is rec.radio.swap. This recognizes a fact that became
evident shortly after the original group was formed: Hams don't just swap ham
radio gear, and other folks besides hams swap ham equipment. If you have radio
equipment, or test gear, or computer stuff that hams would be interested in,
here's the place. Equipment wanted postings belong here too. Discussions about
the equipment generally don't; if you wish to discuss a particular posting
with the buyer, email is a much better way to do it, and the other groups,
especially .equipment and .homebrew, are the place for public discussions.
There is now a regular posting with information on how to go about buying and
selling items in rec.radio.swap; please refer to it before you post there.
To answer a frequently asked question: No, there is no mailing list that
goes along with this group. If you can't read Usenet news directly, you're
out of luck.

The group rec.radio.amateur.policy was created as a place for all the
discussions that seem to drag on interminably about the many rules,
regulations, legalities, and policies that surround amateur radio, both
existing and proposed.  Recent changes to the Amateur Radio Rules (FCC Part
97) have finally laid to rest the Great Usenet Pizza Autopatch Debate - it's
now legal to order a pizza on the autopatch, if you're not in the pizza
business - as well as complaints about now-preempted local scanner laws
hostile to amateurs, but plenty of discussion about what a bunch of rotten
no-goodniks the local frequency coordinating body is, as well as the
neverending no-code debate, may still be found here.

The group rec.radio.cb is the place for all discussion about the Citizens'
Band radio service. Such discussions have been very inflammatory in
rec.ham-radio in the past; please do not cross-post to both rec.radio.cb and
rec.radio.amateur.* unless the topic is genuinely of interest to both hams
and CBers - and very few topics are.

The rec.radio.info group is just what its name implies: it's the place where
informational messages from across rec.radio.* may be found, regardless of
where else they're posted. As of this writing, information posted to the
group includes Cary Oler's daily solar progagation bulletins, ARRL
bulletins, the Frequently Asked Questions files for the various groups, and
radio modification instructions. This group is moderated, so you cannot post
to it directly; if you try, even if your message is crossposted to one of
the other groups, your message will be mailed to the moderator, who is
currently David Dodell, WB7TPY. The email address for submissions to the
group is [e-mail]. Inquires and other administrivia should be
directed to [e-mail]. For more information about
rec.radio.info, consult the introduction and posting guidelines that are
regularly posted to that newsgroup.

The groups rec.radio.amateur.antenna, .equipment, .homebrew, and .space are
for more specialized areas of ham radio: discussions about antennas,
commercially-made equipment, homebrewing, and amateur radio space operations.
The .equipment group is not the place for buying or selling equipment; that's
what rec.radio.swap is for. Similarly, the .space group is specifically about
amateur radio in space, such as the OSCAR program and SAREX, the Shuttle
Amateur Radio EXperiment; other groups cover other aspects of satellites and
space. Homebrewing isn't about making your own alcoholic beverages at home
(that's rec.crafts.brewing), but rather construction of radio and electronic
equipment by the amateur experimenter.

Except for rec.radio.swap and rec.radio.cb, all of these newsgroups are
available by Internet electronic mail in digest format; send a mail message
containing "help" on a line by itself to [e-mail] for instructions
on how to use the mail server.

All of the groups can be posted to by electronic mail, though, by using a
gateway at the University of Texas at Austin. To post a message this way,
change the name of the group you wish to post to by replacing all of the '.'s
with '-'s - for example, rec.radio.swap becomes rec-radio-swap - and send to
that [e-mail] ([e-mail], for example). You may
crosspost by including multiple addresses as Cc: entries (but see below). This
gateway's continued availability is at the pleasure of the admins at
UT-Austin, and is subject to going away at any time - and especially if
forgeries and other net.abuses become a problem. You have been warned.

Mailing Lists
=============

In addition to the mailing lists that mirror the Usenet newsgroups, there
also are a few that stand alone. These cover specific areas of ham radio,
and discussion is focused on just those areas.

The cq-contest mailing list is for discussions of contesting in ham radio.
To join, send email with the word "subscribe" on a line by itself to
[e-mail].

The DX mailing list covers the finer points of DXing. This one is also
joined by mailing "subscribe" on a line by itself, this time to
[e-mail].

There's also a VHF mailing list, for VHF operators of the weak signal
persuasion. You can join this one be sending "subscribe vhf" on a line by
itself to [e-mail].

All of the following mailing lists are sponsored to the Boston Amateur Radio
Club, as well as some others of local interest. Thanks to N1IST for the
information.

qrp-l:  This is the qrp mailing list, previously maintained by Bruce
        Walker at Think.com.  It is for discussions about the design,
        construction, and use of qrp (low power) radios and related
        equipment.
arrl-ve-list: This is a one-way list, run by Bart Jahnke of the ARRL
        VEC, for announcements to VEs and VE teams.
w1aw-list:     ARRL bulletins, news, and information
newsline-list: Redistribution of Amateur Radio Newsline
letter-list:   Redistribution of the ARRL Letter
fox-list:      Fox hunting and Radio Direction Finding
fieldorg-l:    ARRL field organization discussions
ham-tech:      Technical discussions and questions about Amateur Radio
arrl-exam-list: amateur radio license examinations scheduled in the US and
                in some foreign areas.

To sign up or inquire about these lists, send mail to [e-mail]
with the following in the body (subject is ignored) of the message.
<listname> is the name of the list to subscribe to.
  To subscribe:   subscribe <listname>
  To unsubscribe: unsubscribe <listname>
  For more information: help
  To post (to the two-way lists), send your message to <listname>@netcom.com

Please do NOT send subscription requests to the mailing lists themselves;
that doesn't work very often, and is very annoying to those on the list.
Also, please keep your electronic mail address current with any mailing
lists you subscribe to, as dealing with returned email is a nuisance for the
person maintaining the mailing list.

A Few Words on Crossposting
===========================

Please do not crosspost messages to two or more groups unless there is genuine
interest in both groups in the topic being discussed, and when you do, please
include a header line of the form "Followup-To: group.name" in your article's
headers (before the first blank line). This will cause followups to your
article to go to the group listed in the Followup-To: line. If you wish
to have replies to go to you by email, rather than be posted, use the word
"poster" instead of the name of a group. Such a line appears in the headers
of this article.

One of the few examples of productive cross-posting is with the rec.radio.info
newsgroup. To provide a filtered presentation of information articles, while
still maintaining visibility in their home newsgroups, the moderator strongly
encourages cross-posting. All information articles should be submitted to the
rec.radio.info moderator so that he may simultaneously cross-post your
information to the appropriate newsgroups. Most newsreaders will only present
the article once, and network bandwidth is conserved since only one article is
propagated. If you make regular informational postings, and have made
arrangements with the moderator to post directly to the group, please
cross-post as appropriate.

--
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
[e-mail]   | adequately be explained by stupidity.
      "All is strange and vague." "Are we dead?" "Or is this Ohio?"
                      -- Yakko and Dot Warner


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:49 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
From: [e-mail] (Walter Scott)
Subject: HAL Morse Keyboard ??
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 22:07:59 GMT


In 1973, HAL Communications Corp. sold an MKB-1 Morse Keyboard and a
KB-ID1 Keyboard Identifier.  Does anyone remember these devices?

After building them from kits, they worked well.  Recently I tried to
change the call sign in the Identifier without success.  There appears
to be a race problem in the design.

Does anyone remember these devices?  -The problem that makes the Identifier
pattern sensitive?  -A fix?

73,
  Scott
    KI6KW



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dale Kight)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Hallicrafters HA-5 VFO
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:34:36
Message-ID: <4ipmhp$[e-mail]>

Hallifcrafters HA-5 VFO ... Perfect condition !! ( as close to new
and out of the box as you can get )

FIRST $100.00 FIRM
******************************************************************************
******
Dale Kight   NH6VR    3231 NW 50th St. #232 Oklahoma City, Ok. 73112
E-mail:  [e-mail]     Phone  [phone]

Looking for:
     1.   Hallicrafters SX-140 Rcvr
     2.   Lafayette HE-30 Rcvr
******************************************************************************
******



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dale Kight)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Hallicrafters SX-140 WANTED
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 12:26:36
Message-ID: <4ik9qp$[e-mail]>

Wanted SX-140 in mint shape ..

State price ...


Dale     NH6VR
* * *  If you can dream it .... You  CAN GET IT   !!!   * * *



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:51 1996
From: <Unknown> (Raymond Hoopes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham Radio Equipment for Sale
Date: 14 Mar 1996 00:59:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7r1n$[e-mail]>

Yaesu FT-736R. Tranciever , 2 Meter + 70 CM ( 440 MHZ.)
Yeasu YS-500 SWR + Power meter
Yaesu Dynamic Mic.
Cushcraft A430-11 70 CM. FM YAGI Ant.
Cushcraft A144-11 2 Meter YAGI Ant.
Alliance Heavy Duty Rotator Dual Speed


$2000.00 or best offer.


E-Mail [e-mail] or [e-mail]
Phone Number 716-973-3431 ask for Ray Sr.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:52 1996
From: <Unknown> (Raymond Hoopes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham Radio Equipment For Sale
Date: 14 Mar 1996 01:01:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7r4c$[e-mail]>


Yaesu FT-736R. Tranciever , 2 Meter + 70 CM ( 440 MHZ.)
Yeasu YS-500 SWR + Power meter
Yaesu Dynamic Mic.
Cushcraft A430-11 70 CM. FM YAGI Ant.
Cushcraft A144-11 2 Meter YAGI Ant.
Alliance Heavy Duty Rotator Dual Speed


$2000.00 or best offer.


E-Mail [e-mail] or [e-mail]
Phone Number 716-973-3431 ask for Ray Sr.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (mike fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham repeater stuff wanted
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 16:41:45 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

The Tampa Bay Amateur Radio Society is looking for gear to replace our
440 repeater located in Tampa, Fl.  Looking for Micor or Mastr-II type
equipment.  Also looking for 440 link transmitters and receivers for a
sattellite rcvr system.  Our club provides emergency communisations
for the Bay area Red Cross chapter as well as ARES/RACES events.  If
you have equipment for sale or donation, please e-mail me with your
lists.  Thanks and 73s  Mike
Mike Fletcher  AD4HV     813-622-9102
President,Tampa Bay Amateur Radio Society 95-96
Florida Certified Fire Alarm Contractor # EF-0000028
E-Mail to  [e-mail]   Homepage  **coming soon**
If in the course of offering ideas or speaking my opinion, I
should offend anyone, I apologize.  However, my opinion is my
own and thus, it shall be...................................


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:54 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (SARUMAN)
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4i4diq$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 06:48:43 GMT

>Actually, go to Barry's to look at and feel the equipment, see what's out
>there in person, and then purchase from one of the vastly cheaper
>mail-order houses. If you insist on store-front, get a price quote from one
>of the above-mail-order houses and demand that Barry's meet the price.

>As well, for things with the prices printed on them (e.g. ARRL books),
>and for small (<$30) items, the NYC sales tax + subway token is cheaper
>than shipping from a mail-order house.

>>   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

>//jbaltz
>--
>jerry b. altzman   Entropy just isn't what it used to be      [phone]
>[e-mail]   [e-mail]                KE3ML

Thanx for the tip. Would you happen to know of an upcoming testing session?
I'm currently studying the Gordon West No Code Tech book and will be in need o
f
a test site soon to become licenced. Thanx

<tsb>
                               Midgard Graphics
           3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer
                          Email: [e-mail]

--
          Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime

--

<tsb>

                     A man of many hobby's master of none.




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jerry B. Altzman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Date: 12 Mar 1996 12:51:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4i4diq$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
ROLAND STINER <[e-mail]> wrote:
>To: [e-mail]
>M> Howdy from another New Yorker. I am fairly clueless tho, just getting into
>>hobby.

>Then take this advice, stay away from Barry Electronics!

Actually, go to Barry's to look at and feel the equipment, see what's out
there in person, and then purchase from one of the vastly cheaper
mail-order houses. If you insist on store-front, get a price quote from one
of the above-mail-order houses and demand that Barry's meet the price.

As well, for things with the prices printed on them (e.g. ARRL books),
and for small (<$30) items, the NYC sales tax + subway token is cheaper
than shipping from a mail-order house.

>   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman   Entropy just isn't what it used to be      [phone]
[e-mail]   [e-mail]                KE3ML


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 07:07:00 -0500
Distribution: world
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER)


To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC

M>Thanx for the tip. Would you happen to know of an upcoming testing session?
 >I'm currently studying the Gordon West No Code Tech book and will be in need
 >a test site soon to become licenced. Thanx

No, but you can get the information for a SASE from the ARRL in
Newington, CT.  They'll be glad to help.

---
   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------

 * Origin: CyberNet BBS   Lyndhurst, NJ (1:2604/151)

              .....oooooOOOOOo         http://www.intac.com/~cono
      __,-----. ---+_________#_     The Roy Hobbs BBS [e-mail]
     |________| |__|___________}          Node 1: 201-641-7307
      ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\         Node 2: 201-641-3126



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:57 1996
From: "Lorelei Lindenaux (SAR)" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Heathkit HP24
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 20:11:46 -0500
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960314200821.20197A-100000@virtu>


My dad is looking for: Heathkit HP AC Power Supply with or without the
                       HA 14 Amplifier.
You may call him at 1-813-842-4818  New Port Richey Florida or you may
e-mail me at: [e-mail]
I will have him (W4NHP) Maurice  call you.

                                    Thanks,  Lorelei


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (james weber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:56:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6uuf$[e-mail]>

I am looking to buy my son a radio. I have a friend who has a old
Yeasu FT101-ex, and I saw a ad for a FT-840. Could someone e-mail
me with info as to which is the better radio and why? Thanks :)



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:51:59 1996
From: "Michael E. Pinault" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Identify Microwave Amps
Date: 13 Mar 1996 06:30:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4i5q2l$[e-mail]>

I have 2 Motorola 1.8-2.3 GHZ -24 volt power amps numbers MU594-12 and
MLG1003A. Looking for schematics/info. Any help would be appreciated

--
Mike Pinault --- N3CEV/7           | Anything under 50 MHZ must be DC!!!
Near Spokane "Spo-can" Washington  |
Locator DN17fl                     |




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:01 1996
From: "C. Wheeler" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Identify Microwave Amps
Date: 13 Mar 1996 16:44:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6u0q$[e-mail]>
References: <4i5q2l$[e-mail]>

"Michael E. Pinault" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>I have 2 Motorola 1.8-2.3 GHZ -24 volt power amps numbers MU594-12 and
>MLG1003A. Looking for schematics/info. Any help would be appreciated
>

An MLG1003A is a UHF amp for the first stage of a Motorola microwave
radio such as the MR600 6 GHz terminal.  Is it a brown thing (just looks
like abig heat sink) about 10x6x1.5 inches (about?).  The MLG100x takes a
600 to 750 MHz input at about 450mw from an oscillator and amplifies it
to about 12 to 15 watts.

Then you have a MU594.  Which is not one I am familiar with, but hey, the
number is close to MU591.  The 591 is a 2 GHz multiplier.  It takes the
~700 MHz signal at 12 to 15 watts from the MLG1003 and triples it to the
2 GHz range.  The output of the 2 GHz tripler is about 6 watts.

On the 6 GHz system, another multiplier such as the MLN1002 will take the
6 watt, 2 GHz signal from the previous tripler and triple it again to the
6 GHz range at about 1 watt.  From there it goes to the waveguide.

Motorola made an MR-200 2 GHz terminal that just didn't use the second
tripler.  The output of the 2 GHz tripler was padded down to just a
couples of watts before it went to the antenna.  The MU594 may have come
from that radio.  I have never worked on an MR-200.

I have some documentation on the 1003 but I have to look for it.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:02 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
Date: 20 Mar 1996 17:20:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4ipeov$[e-mail]>
References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (William Rahl) wrote:
>Could someone direct me to a good book on repeater linking. I have
>heard of voters and linking remote receivers via radio or Telephone lines.
>
>I looked in the Handbook,but it really doesn't explain to much. What I
>want
>to know is a Remote receiver just that ,a RX radio or is it a another
>Repeater!

   I can't recommend a good book, unfortunately, but a remote receive site is
typically another repeater.  Most multi-site 2m repeaters I'm aware of, for
instance, link the remote receive sites to the main site by 440 MHz links, so
the remote receive sites are really cross-band 2m/440 repeaters.  They have
repeater controllers, auto-ID, etc. just like the main repeater; they listen o
n
the repeater's input frequency and transmit on the link frequency.  The link
receiver at the main site receives the link frequency and provides audio for
the voter, etc.
   Some repeaters link on bands other than 440, but this is the most popular
band for repeater linking, at least in my neck of the woods.  Linking by
telephone lines is an expensive option; in this case the remote receive sites
aren't repeaters, but rather receivers with their audio circuitry permanently
hooked up the the phone line.  In this case, the remote sites need not ID sinc
e
they are not tranmitting.

73 de Will KB9JTT




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Curt Phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help with Atlas 210X
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 22:44:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4iq1bo$[e-mail]>
References: <4ii0vs$[e-mail]>

In article <4ii0vs$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (David Wells) wrote:
>A friend gave me the above radio that was on a boat he bought. It turns on bu
t
>no RX or TX. I have an interconnect diagram but no schematic of the PCB's. Ar
e
>they available? Is anyone still servicing Atlas or have any parts? Would
>appreciate any info. Tnx.

  Some people don't realize it, but even though the Atlas is relatively
small, you can turn it into a "handheld" sized unit.  Indeed, it
can and *should* be done with any Atlas radio.
  The way you do it is to find the nearest industrial strength
trash compactor, insert the Atlas radio, switch the compactor on and
crush the Atlas into a small, neat, easily handled package.
Don't worry... it will work just as well crushed as it ever did before
and it's much easier to carry.
  You said he gave it to you... you STILL didn't get a good deal :-).
But, I'm not sure I'd call anyone who gave me an Atlas a "friend".

  That's the best help I can give you.  I guess this post really
tests that "I'd appreciate any info" line, doesn't it?  :-)

  A former Atlas 180 owner from 20 years ago who STILL hates them...
========== Opinions expressed are solely those of the author =========
Curt Phillips, CEM KD4YU (ex-WB4LHI)  |
Chairman, Tar Heel Scanner/SWL Group  |  DEATH to the
ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh ARS; NRA; AEE|       Tasters' Choice couple.
Energy/Recycling BBS 704-547-3114     |
== [e-mail] ===========================================


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (TeaForOne)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Yaesu SP-767P Speaker/phone patch!
Date: 13 Mar 1996 01:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4i5roq$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TeaForOne)

Hi, Rich here in NY.
Just picked up a 767 and it came with this speaker phone patch, but no
manual for it. anyone help me with how to use it ?

thank you and 73

KB2TMA


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael T. Hodgson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HELP! Alliance HD-73
Date: 17 Mar 1996 14:02:40 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Is there anyone out there that might have a schematic
for the Alliance HD-73 control box? The one that I have has been
butchered inside to work with some other motor unit...Also looking
for a correct motor drive unit for the control unit.

e-mail replies to: [e-mail]


Thanks!

Mike

--
Mike - Raleigh, NC USA

Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not in any way
represent those of my employer.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:06 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: David Drinnan <[e-mail]>
Subject: Help! FT900 prob
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 09:00:47 GMT

Hello all

I need some help with a problem on my FT-900.  The processor got
scrambled for some reason, giving me nonsensical screen info.  Then after
a few seconds the rig turned itself off.  Now, when I turn it on, the
display does not light and the power relay clicks in for only a couple of
seconds.

I!ve tried the reset buttons on the main body and on the detachable
screen head.  I!ve also checked the obvious switch positions.  Has anyone
seen this before?  I have a feeling there must be a soft reset somewhere
that I don!t know about.  Advice anyone?

Please email, as I have intermittent NEWS access.  Thanks for your help.
D.

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:06 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HELP....KPC-3 to HP 700/92
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 21:16:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7e30$[e-mail]>

Sorry to bother everyone here.  I am attempting (Please note the term
used) to connect my KPC-3 to an HP terminal.  They connect but don't
talk to each other.  Any ideas?  Email me at [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ross Alexander)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 14 Mar 1996 01:26:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7skd$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4i1kic$[e-mail]>

Cecil Moore <[e-mail]> writes:

>[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>>If it is the alternator, it would be a good idea to check the
>>alternator brushes.

>Hi Gary, I was under the impression that DC generators had brushes
>but AC alternators didn't. I'm chasing a noise problem in my S10.
>Are there really brushes in there?

I torn the alternator in my Ford F100 down and rebuilt it a few years
ago. (What I'm trying to say is that my experience is not broad, but
deep :).  There are certainly a pair of brushes in there, carrying
current for the exciter winding (the winding on the rotor).  But
that's a DC winding so I wouldn't expect it to contribute a whine,
rather a hiss *if* that was the problem.  Bypassing the brushes with
small value disc ceramics should quiet the noise.

regards,
Ross ve6pdq


--
Ross Alexander, ve6pdq  --  [phone]  --  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:09 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 14 Mar 1996 13:30:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4i9ok7$[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Gar
y
Coffman) writes:
>In article <4i7skd$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Ross Alex
an
der) writes:
>>Cecil Moore <[e-mail]> writes:
>>>[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>>>>If it is the alternator, it would be a good idea to check the
>>>>alternator brushes.
>>
>>>Hi Gary, I was under the impression that DC generators had brushes
>>>but AC alternators didn't. I'm chasing a noise problem in my S10.
>>>Are there really brushes in there?
>>
>>I torn the alternator in my Ford F100 down and rebuilt it a few years
>>ago. (What I'm trying to say is that my experience is not broad, but
>>deep :).  There are certainly a pair of brushes in there, carrying
>>current for the exciter winding (the winding on the rotor).  But
>>that's a DC winding so I wouldn't expect it to contribute a whine,
>>rather a hiss *if* that was the problem.  Bypassing the brushes with
>>small value disc ceramics should quiet the noise.
>
>Sometimes, Ross, but usually they, or the slip rings, are chewed
>up, and they arc like mad. Of course then you have a spark transmitter,
>and it will produce the hash the poster was reporting. This is *not*
>the source of alternator "whine", but the poster didn't report whine.
>
>Gary
>
>--
>Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
>Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp addres
se
s
>534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
>Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |
>
The Alternator and the Generator have Carbon Brushes
The fundamental differences are in the winding to brush interface. The DC
Generator has commutator segments (individual slip sections) while the
alternator has smooth continuous slip rings.  The alternator has
a diode configuration accross the output to provide DC vs the AC produced
by the alternator.

A word to the wise concerning brush replacement:  If you are running a
transmitter in your vehicle check the alternator for excessive brush wear on
an annual basis. Improper brush seating and high current load will cause brush
pitting, and with pitting will come arcing, and with arcing come electrical
noise.

73's Dick K8WHA


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ross Alexander)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 15 Mar 1996 19:48:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4ichi7$[e-mail]>
References: <4i9ok7$[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Gar
y
Coffman) writes:

>Sometimes, Ross, but usually they, or the slip rings, are chewed
>up, and they arc like mad.

Oh, heck, I'm not suggesting for a minute that bypassing the brushes
is a the proper repair for worn or pitted brushes and/or sliprings.
The fix for worn out parts is of course new parts.  And the first
course of action is to tear down and inspect.  I don't like bandaid
repairs (except to get back home, of course.)  I was speaking in an
assumed (and I should have made it explicit) context of a properly
maintained alternator being RF noisy, probably due to inherently poor
design.

regards,
Ross ve6pdq
--
Ross Alexander, ve6pdq  --  [phone]  --  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Myers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Altenator Noise in Mobile killing my RX
Date: 14 Mar 1996 21:21:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4ia2lh$[e-mail]>
References: <4hk62p$[e-mail]> <4i7skd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, C. J. Hawley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Gary Coffman wrote:
>
>> and it will produce the hash the poster was reporting. This is *not*
>> the source of alternator "whine", but the poster didn't report whine.
>>
>> Gary
>
>OK. How do you get rid of whine?

Hmmm... for a start, we could cut off AOL, Prodigy and Compuserve from
the Internet...

OHHHHH... you mean alternator whine.... never mind....


P.S. Yes, I know this is an off-topic post.

--
 * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are      *
 * [phone]               | mine and do not necessarily   *
 * [e-mail]      | reflect those of my employer  *


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Darren Hatcher)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Help: Ten Tec Argosy schematic/docs
Date: 14 Mar 1996 09:51:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4i8q6o$[e-mail]>

Hi All,

I've just become an owner of a Ten Tec Argosy and don't have much in the way
of documentation for it. I've had no joy net-searching so far, so ...
has anyone got a user manual, schematic or modification info to share???
Postage, etc, would be re-embursed.


Thanks in advance for any info,

Darren Hatcher
G0WCW
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Len Revelle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Help: Ten Tec Argosy schematic/docs
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 01:22:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4id5gl$[e-mail]>
References: <4i8q6o$[e-mail]>

Ten-Tec probably has manuals, if not they will send a photocopy, at a
reasonable cost. I think I only paid a few bucks for a good Argo 509
copy.
[e-mail] (Darren Hatcher) wrote:

>Hi All,

>I've just become an owner of a Ten Tec Argosy and don't have much in the way
>of documentation for it. I've had no joy net-searching so far, so ...
>has anyone got a user manual, schematic or modification info to share???
>Postage, etc, would be re-embursed.


>Thanks in advance for any info,

>Darren Hatcher
>G0WCW
>[e-mail]





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Kay)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: How do you like your Yaesu FT-3000M?
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:03:07 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

     Thanks, in advance.  I'm seriously considering one, and am trying to
find out the following:  (manuals aren't available for one to two months)

1.  Does the receiver has advanced track tuning is 110-180 MHz, like the 2500M
?
2.  How is intermod resistance?
3.  How easy/hard is the auto dial to use?
4.  Just how well does that Smart Scarch work?
5.  How much and what can you control the rig from the mike?
6.  Overall, how would you rate the rig?

                              TNX   de   AB7FV,  Dave


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How much RF pwr does an ant tuner consume?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 23:25:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4i51d7$[e-mail]>
References: <4hmvnf$[e-mail]> <4hu43u$[e-mail]> <4i49j8$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (WB7ASR) wrote:

>So which would be more power efficient, torroid or cap/coil
>type antenna tuner or tank circuit?

Neither is more or less efficient under all conditions.  It depends on
the feedpoint impedance and design of the components.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Tse)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT Battery Suppliers - Who the Best?
Date: 14 Mar 1996 04:16:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4i86is$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4hu28j$[e-mail]>

In article <4hu28j$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...

>My experience with W&W has been mixed.  I recently ordered some AAA NiCd
>cells with solder tabs from them, and had been told on the phone that W&W
>manufactured the cells and they were rated at 220 mAH (a figure also
>listed in their catalog).  It took W&W about a week to process the order,
>and the cells which arrived were manufactured by Sanyo, not by W&W.  I
>decided to use them anyway since I've had reasonably good luck with Sanyo
>cells (although I do think there are better products on the market), but
>after I got them soldered together I noticed they were only rated at 200 mAH
>rather than 250 mAH; which is the rating of Sanyo's current AAA cells.
[rest of story deleted]
>
>                                                Greg

When I ordered my pack for my Standard HT, I was told it's 12V 800mAH, and I
confirmed w/ the W&W sales staff again (by asking them how they can do it whil
e
their competition is only 600mAH).  It arrived as rated 600mAH on the case.  W
hen
I called them, they said they had no 800mAH version.  So what was that I was t
old?

Read the rest of the story in my other post 2 days ago.

So now this confirmed they lied to their customers, at least twice by now.
Strangely I really like their charger though :).

So, caveat emptor!

David



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Duane Whittingham)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX 212 ?
Date: 18 Mar 96 14:04:13 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

What is a HTX-212?

--
>>>> Duane Whittingham - N9SSN - Dedicated to TVRO & Radio Broadcasting!  <<<<

                    [e-mail]  (MHGC -- Damian Smith)

>>>> Tom & Darryl TVRO Show Now on E2/18 5.8 Audio Thursdays at 9pm ET!   <<<<


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:20 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX 212 ?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 18:32:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4imukh$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Duane Whittingham) wrote:
>What is a HTX-212?
>
Radio Shack's 2m mobile rig.

73 de Will KB9JTT




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:21 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202 birdie fix, HELP!, RS claims no fixes...
Date: 19 Mar 1996 06:39:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4ilkr9$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

On March 9, 1996,  Raki - Glenn Johnson - KB5VQI - Fort Worth Texas USA wrote:

>Never thought about bypassing (removing power to) the oscillator.
>
>A true mod to the 202 that inproves RX sensitivity!
>A small switch to turn on/off the power to the DTMF circutry
>should do the trick, you think?

  This would not be good.  The 3.597 crystal is the reference oscillator for t
he
CPU.  Disableing it will disable the radio.  By "bypassing", the original post
er
probably meant RF bypassing for VHF using amall value capacitors, along with
additional RF shielding around the CPU.

  I also spoke to RS tech about the problem,  and they were no help to me eith
er.
A possible solution that I can see would be to change the crystal to 3.61 MHz.
This would move the birdie to 148.01, outside of the bandwidth of the radio.
It's close enough that it _SHOULDN'T_ affect operation of the CPU adversly.  T
he
PLL section uses a seperate 12.8 MHz crystal, so this wouldn't affect the freq
uency
accuracy of the radio.  The only ill affect could be a shift in the frequencie
s of
the DTMF and CTCSS tones, but how much, I don't know....







From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:21 1996
From: Steven Meltz <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-202 Question
Date: 20 Mar 1996 20:04:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4ipobi$[e-mail]>

I have two 2 year old HTX-202s, one of which has developed the following
problem.  I use the rig mobile, and on a few (seemingly random)
frequencies (one of which is my favorite repeater naturally!) the unit
takes a few seconds to come up to full power when I press PTT. I measured
the output with an external meter, and I get the same indication; the
power goes up to 2 to 3 watts, than after 1 to 3 seconds will "jump" up
to full 7 watts.  The SWR is 1:1.  Again, this only happens on a few
frequencies.  I brought the unit into the house and it acts the same.

Any theories or solutions would be greatly apprectiated.

Thanks.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:22 1996
From: Brian Webb <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: de.comm.ham,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: HTX-212 & MFJ-1270C TNC
Date: 16 Mar 1996 21:40:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4ifch4$3s8$[e-mail]>

Several weeks ago I purchased a Radio Shack HTX-212 mobile
2-meter radio. I own an MFJ-1270C TNC. What I'd like to do is
hook these two units together so I can operate on packet.

Here are some questions:

1. Does anybody sell a pre-made HTX-212 to MFJ-1270C interface
cable?

2. If I have to make my own cable, does anybody have a schematic?

3. Where can I buy an extra modular mic plug of the type used on
the HTX-212?

4. Have any of you interfaced these rigs and gotten them to work?
If so, is there anything that I should know?

Regards,

Brian Webb, KD6NRP
Thousand Oaks, CA


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (Burch Akin)
Newsgroups: de.comm.ham,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: HTX-212 & MFJ-1270C TNC
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:44:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4in2vm$[e-mail]>
References: <4ifch4$3s8$[e-mail]>

Brian Webb <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Several weeks ago I purchased a Radio Shack HTX-212 mobile
>2-meter radio. I own an MFJ-1270C TNC. What I'd like to do is
>hook these two units together so I can operate on packet.

>Here are some questions:

>1. Does anybody sell a pre-made HTX-212 to MFJ-1270C interface
>cable?

>2. If I have to make my own cable, does anybody have a schematic?

>3. Where can I buy an extra modular mic plug of the type used on
>the HTX-212?

>4. Have any of you interfaced these rigs and gotten them to work?
>If so, is there anything that I should know?

>Regards,

>Brian Webb, KD6NRP
>Thousand Oaks, CA

I have the same radio and TNC.  I had to make my own cable.  If you
call MFJ they will mail you a schematic.  I think the parts costs
under $5.




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:25 1996
From: Carl Estey <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-706 repeater offset question
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 07:46:21 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have attempted to program in plus and minus offsets for repeaters in
the manner that the Icom IC-706 manual advises but either my radio is
broken, or the software is broken or I can't read!

The only way I have been able to program the offsets is to use VFO A and
B and the split mode.  Just setting -600 in the offset setup doesn't seem
to work.

Am I doing something wrong ... or did Icom start the offset programming
and not fully implement it?

Carl
--
Carl Estey, Amateur Radio Station WA0CQG
Honeywell Inc., Homes and Building Control, MN10-2518, 1885 Douglas Dr.,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 [phone]
E-Mail:  [e-mail] or [e-mail]
(TCP/IP)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Guy Teague)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706 repeater offset question
Date: 17 Mar 1996 18:34:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4ii7i1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Carl Estey ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I have attempted to program in plus and minus offsets for repeaters in
: the manner that the Icom IC-706 manual advises but either my radio is
: broken, or the software is broken or I can't read!

: The only way I have been able to program the offsets is to use VFO A and
: B and the split mode.  Just setting -600 in the offset setup doesn't seem
: to work.

: Am I doing something wrong ... or did Icom start the offset programming
: and not fully implement it?

: Carl
: --
: Carl Estey, Amateur Radio Station WA0CQG
: Honeywell Inc., Homes and Building Control, MN10-2518, 1885 Douglas Dr.,
: Golden Valley, MN 55422 [phone]
: E-Mail:  [e-mail] or [e-mail]
: (TCP/IP)
--------

I just got mine this weekend so I might be missing something but I just
bring up the 2m freq in the main VFO, go to menu M1 and _hold down_ the SPL
(F1) key until it beeps. You can check your TX freq by going to
menu G3 and reading the TX freq on that line. As you mention, you do have
to set the -600 offset in initial setup mode, although that is a default
on my radio. I found this on page 28 (Repeater operation) item 4 of the
owners manual.

Now I have a return question: Does your radio have a 15Khz TS rate? Mine
goes from 12.5 to 20Khz, skipping 15.

Hope that gets you fixed up.

--
Regards  73 de  [e-mail]  "They're out there"              K Kesey
Guy      KG5VT  [e-mail]  "Hey don't eat that yellow snow" F Zappa
-------  -----  <http://www.why.net/home/gteague/gtweb.html>      ------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:27 1996
From: Randall Rhea <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706 Rx sensitivity is ?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:00:30 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4h6bt8$[e-mail]> <4hd2s3$[e-mail]>
To: Martin Moerman <[e-mail]>

Martin Moerman wrote:
>
> I was at my local ham shop and cause i was interested in de alinco dx-70
> or the icom 706 he told me that they have a mod for rx on hf for the 706,
> But I saw a message on internet that a american expanded his receive from
> 0.15 to 35 and 45 to 60 Mhz..

The 706 receives HF just fine right out of the box.  VHF receive is not
good
outside of the ham bands unless you perform a modification that moves a
yellow wire
from the front of the unit to the back.  I have this mod if you are
interested.
The mod the ham store was talking about was probably a transmit mod for
HF, which
involves clipping a diode.  The unit will transmit continuously from 1.6
to 54 MHz
after this mod.  I know of no vhf transmit mod at this time.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randall Rhea                                        Systems Engineer
Informix Software                                   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (Stephan Rashkin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC706 VHF Mars/CAP transmit ??????
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 07:40:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4id9pl$[e-mail]>



Well it's been over a month or so and the service manuals
have been out...Has anyone undone Icom's blunder of
excluding VHF/CAP Mars operators????

Steve, WA2NHZ

*************************************

Stephan Rashkin, WA2NHZ
E-mail: [e-mail]

Looking for:

1. Johnson VF-122 VFO
2. BC696 / T-19 Command Xmtr



*************************************



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Donald M. Ross)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom 2AT Mods
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 03:06:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4iijdn$[e-mail]>

I seem to remember a way of modifying an Icom 2AT for
simplex in the 141-150 Mhz range.  I love my -2AT's and
would like to use them for CAP simplex.

Is my memory failing?

Thanks folks.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gary Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706 question - tuning?
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 13:24:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6iik$[e-mail]>
References: <4i2i1f$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Clark Jones) wrote:

>A few months ago I purchased an Icom 706, but haven't had a lot of time
>to use it.

>One thing I haven't figured out yet:  is there a way to get it to "turn
>on the carrier" so that I can adjust a manual tuner?  The "tune" button
>seems to only work for auto-tuners (and only ones with "Icom" on the
>nameplate :-( ).

>Plugging in the key and switching to "CW" mode isn't all that convenient,
>but it is the only way I've found so far.

Put the 706 into RTTY or FM or lastly AM mode. All key a dead carrier
when the Mic PTT is pressed.  I use FM mostly for tuner adjustments,
although RTTY works just fine.  The tuner button is for using ICOM
tuners only.

Gary






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:31 1996
From: Mark Monte <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM AG-25 LNA
Date: 16 Mar 1996 23:22:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4ifif0$[e-mail]>

Anyone using this LNA with the YAESU FT-736 for satellite work?  How do
you like it?  I need an LNA for AO-10 and AO-13 work.  Tnx --- Mark




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott A. Manthe)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom Delta 1A Information Sought
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:33:38 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I'm wondering if anyone who has a Delta 1A could e-mail me their
impressions of the rig? I'm thinking about picking one up now that the
price has come down and am interested in this rig's performance and
features. I'm especially interested in intermod rejection, frequency
coverage (early vs. later, post ECPA, models), it's relative size and
battery life. I'd be interested in anything else anyone might consider
useful, too.
I'd prefer responses via e-mail, but I do read the news occasionally, so
that'd be OK, too.
Thanks in advance,
Scott

Scott A. Manthe, N9AAT        "There is no reason for any individual
 E-MAIL: [e-mail]          to have a computer in their home."
 Protect your privacy,         Kenneth Olsen, President,
 use PGP.                      Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (Adam Maurer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom Delta100 Crossband repeat
Date: 20 Mar 1996 11:32:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4ioqbu$[e-mail]>

Howdy!

I'm looking for a mod to enable cross-band repeat
in my Delta 100.

Also, I've been trying to get a service manual for
the damn thing, but Icom (Australia) claim one was
never produced for the Delta 100.

All I really need is a copy of the schematic so I can
improve the transmit audio which is really restricted
and disgusting !!!

Any help much appreciated.


Please email me.

Cheers,
Adam VK3ALM



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:33 1996
From: [e-mail] (Phil West)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom IC-02AT for sale.
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 04:44:54 GMT
Message-ID: <4ig4dc$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Icom IC-02AT 2 meter handi talkie for sale .

- Perfect condition
- Comes with 2 battery packs
- Comes with a spare stubby duck antenna (great for hamfests)

I am asking $200.00 for it.

If interested please e-mail me at [e-mail].





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:34 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IF 10C for TS-140S;need Info(buy?)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail]
Date: 19 Mar 96 21:22:21 EST
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world

I just bought an IF-10B from R&L Electronics for my Kenwood. Seems that Kenwoo
d
ran a few more through the factory recently. You might try calling your local
ham supply house.
Mel KJ9C

In article <[e-mail]>, "Dan Hubert (VE9DAN)" <[e-mail].c
a> writes:
> Bill Hosking wrote:
>>
>> Kenwood has discontinued the IF 10C computer interface for the TS-140S. I a
m
>> looking for info/price/availability/schematic whatever you can provide.
>> Thanks
>> Bill W7JSW
>> [e-mail]  -or-
>> [e-mail]...I have a spare one here. I poked around inside of it
 when trying
> to reduce baud rate below 4800. It wouldn't take a lot of effort to get
> it working. All the cables appear to be still there as well.
>
> Zap me e-mail [e-mail]
>
> Dan VE9DAN


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:35 1996
From: "Rick, AA8VQ" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: In Band Repeat Mod for HT
Date: 13 Mar 1996 14:23:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6lp3$[e-mail]>

Anyone heard of a mod for in-band repeat operation of a dual band HT?  I don't
 remember which
radio, ICOM, I think.  Without doing rework to the duplexer cabvity system, ho
w could one do this
without desense or other problems?



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott A. Manthe)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: In Band Repeat Mod for HT
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 13:46:36 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i6lp3$[e-mail]>

In article <4i6lp3$[e-mail]>, "Rick, AA8VQ" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Anyone heard of a mod for in-band repeat operation of a dual band HT?  I
don't remember which
> radio, ICOM, I think.  Without doing rework to the duplexer cabvity
system, how could one do this
> without desense or other problems?

A few years ago, there was an unfounded rumor that the Kenwood TH78 could
do it, but there is no HT that can do "in- band repeat" operation. Given
the fact that it's often difficult to get sufficient isolation with a
multi-cavity duplexer, common sense would seem to indicate that with the
selectivity most HTs exhibit, in-band repeat operation would be a pipe
dream.
73,
Scott

Scott A. Manthe, N9AAT        "There is no reason for any individual
 E-MAIL: [e-mail]          to have a computer in their home."
 Protect your privacy,         Kenneth Olsen, President,
 use PGP.                      Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:38 1996
From: McCullough <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info on RCA Commercial two-way radios
Date: 19 Mar 1996 05:04:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4ilf9r$[e-mail]>

Can anyone direct me to a source for service manuals for old RCA
commercial FM two-way radio equipment. I have what I believe is called a
TAC-300 series radio, Model MFAW2-AC21B.  It's an 800 mhz non-trunked
unit, and I'd like to find a manual for it.  Any ideas?

                                    Thanks,

                                    Chuck McCullough



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info wanted on Kenwood TM-621A 2m/200 mobile
Date: 13 Mar 1996 03:40:45 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i5g3t$[e-mail]>

Hi:
Can anyone provide me with a list of accessories/optional extras
for the Kenwood TM-621A Dual Band 144/220MHz mobile? No Kenwood
dealer around here, and having the proper model numbers of
tone boards and such as that would help in locating pieces/parts.

Thanks,
Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Stan Huntting)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: KaWin - New Version!
Date: 15 Mar 1996 14:07:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4ibtij$[e-mail]>

KaWin 6.35 adds support for the Buckmaster Hamcall CDROM and
a dozen more new features and improvements. KaWin 6.35 is
available for immediate download from the KaWin Home Page. 73,

Stan.
--
Stan Huntting,    KF0IA
Email:            [e-mail]
Fax:              303 444 2314
KaWin home page:  http://www.mutadv.com/kawin/
Postal address:   4655 Pleasant Ridge Rd.,
                  Boulder, CO 80301-1731, USA



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ej Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood Mics
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 18:16:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world
References: <4idgs1$[e-mail]> <4i2eap$[e-mail]>


DM>From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)

DM>
DM>get the NEW Kenwood Back-lit mic...NICE!!!

Do you know how much they sell for?
        Thanks,

EJ Johnson  N6OID
San Diego, Ca.
Not Tonight Baby...., I have a Modem!
---
* CMPQwk #1.42* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:41 1996
From: Jeff Goebel <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TH-79a(d) New Owner Questions
Date: 12 Mar 1996 20:17:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4i4m41$[e-mail]>

I just purchased a Kenwood TH-79a(d) this weekend at a hamfest
and have a few questions.

1) Is there any way to scan both Vhf & Uhf at the same time on
one band?

2) I was disappointed to discover that the battery could only
be charged in the radio--does Kenwood or any one else make a
holder for charging.  (I don't want to buy a quick charger)

3) I did the expanded RX mod and am wanting to scan 300-400 mhz
 military air band.  How do I choose AM modulation for this
band?

4) Can the battery be charged-for how long- or be damaged by
having a battery in while running the radio on 13.8 vdc?

I realize that these are simple questions but they don't seem
to be answered by the manual.

Thanks for you replys,

Jeff Goebel N0VHB
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:42 1996
From: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH79A vs. Yeasu FT-51R
Date: 13 Mar 1996 00:52:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4i569b$9n6$[e-mail]>

Try the high end Alinco if you want good intermod rejection.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Ryan A. Perkins)
Subject: Kenwood TR-2500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Ryan A. Perkins)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 05:17:00 GMT



My dad has aquired a secondhand Kenwood TR-2500 handheld 2m FM Transeiver.
It came with a buch of stuff, car adapter, AC adapter, hand mike etc..

The problem is there is no manual. Both him and I have played with the
radio for a fair while, with very little success on making it do anything
more than the basics.

My dad claims to have attempted to contact Kenwood. If anyone has a
source for manuals, or is even willing to provide some very basic
operating instructions, let me know.

Also: a source for batteries would be nice. All of the rechargeables
that came with it would not hold a charge. A hack was made, using a battery
case, and a bunch of AA's, but the proper rechargables would be nice.

Please EMail, as I don't read this group often. If intrest is expressed
in what I found, I will summarize.

Thank you.
--
  Ryan Perkins - 1:340/44    | I feel that suicide jumpers see a glimpse of
[e-mail] | sanity as they throw themselves from the ledge.
Ask for PGP 2.6.2 public key | That's why they scream all the way down.
          8C5357 : 9F FF BA 93 54 D5 18 78 4B 1E DA GC E3 4E


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (Per-Tore Aasestrand)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TS-50S for commercial use?
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 10:27:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4i67up$[e-mail]>

Does anyone know how I can "open" my TS-50S so it will transmit on any
frequency (not just amateur bands)? Will this also still allow it to
be used in connection with the AT-50 automatic antenna tuner?

Please reply via e-mail: [e-mail]

Thanks & regards,

Per-Tore
LA7NO



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rusty Lotter)
Date: 18 Mar 96 14:54:59
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: KENWOOD TS503
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>




KENWOOD TS503 for Sale...............

Please make me an offer for this fine rig.


                     ZS1WB   Wally
                     ph 04455-31832




--
|FMLYNET:  Rusty Lotter 8:79/0
|Internet: [e-mail]
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
| FMLYNET SA <> INTERNET GATEWAY at Diakonos BBS


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:46 1996
From: Shelby Merrick <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: KENWOOD TS503
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 23:24:41 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Rusty Lotter wrote:
>
> KENWOOD TS503 for Sale...............
>
> Please make me an offer for this fine rig.
>
>                      ZS1WB   Wally
>                      ph 04455-31832
>

Well, to start out the bidding, I'll offer $400.  :)  (with fingers
crossed of course).

73's
KE4AKA
Shelby


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:47 1996
From: Isaac Kohn <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Looking for HF (maybe VHF too) scanner/receiver
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:25:51 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi all.  I'm looking for a receiver with as general coverage as
possible, pref. 80m-2m or more.  Obviously, would have to copy FM as
well as SSB and AM.  E-mail me at [e-mail] and
tell me what you have/how much.  Price is very important, as budget is
tight, so i'd prefer something that's used but working.  Thanks a lot.

73's
Isaac




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Looking For Map
Date: 16 Mar 1996 15:20:11 -0500
Message-ID: <4if7pr$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)

Hello,
  I was wondering what you can a map that displays beam headings??
Example: You look up JA1 and it would say something like 310 Degree's.  I
used to have one and forgot the name of what its called.  Anyways, I am
looking for this type of map and don't know where to find it.   If anyone
has one and willing to get rid of it or sell it please let me know....


                                     Thanks for your time N9MXT1 - Jeffrey


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael D Chodrick)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mailing list
Date: 13 Mar 96 05:38:59 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Please put me on your ham equipt. mailing list. Thank You
Michael Chodrick
KF6BBC
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Marine and ham HF/SSB
Date: 16 Mar 1996 08:52:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4ieh2l$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

>>
>> Is it possible to buy a HF/SSB radio that can be used for Marine and
ham
>> frequencies 2000 to 30000 . How much would a suitable secondhand radio
>> cost. How does that compare to buying to separate marine and Ham radios
>> I have on my boat a crystal tuned marine HF/SSB with 10 fequencies 2 to
>> 8 and would like to get somthing more versitle fo long range cruising
>>
>> VLV8987
>

I assume you have a ham license, and aren't like those idiots around the
Virgin Islands that buy or bootleg foreign licenses just to use Ham
frequencies for boat to boat or shore chatter?
Tom


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:52 1996
From: Barry Brazier <[e-mail] >
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Marine and ham HF/SSB
Date: 15 Mar 1996 07:42:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4ib71q$[e-mail]>


Is it possible to buy a HF/SSB radio that can be used for Marine and ham
frequencies 2000 to 30000 . How much would a suitable secondhand radio
cost. How does that compare to buying to separate marine and Ham radios
I have on my boat a crystal tuned marine HF/SSB with 10 fequencies 2 to
8 and would like to get somthing more versitle fo long range cruising

VLV8987





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:53 1996
From: USCG TELECOMMS <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Marine and ham HF/SSB
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:40:35 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ib71q$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

......the telcomms act authorizes the FCC to license recreational marine
radios by rule.  The FCC will probably act on this very soon.  What this
means is that recreational boaters will no longer need a license to
operate a radio in the HF and VHF marine bands.  You will still need a
license, though, to operate in the Ham bands.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:54 1996
From: "George J. Molnar" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Marine and ham HF/SSB
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 09:08:25 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ib71q$[e-mail]>
To: Barry Brazier <[e-mail]>

Barry Brazier wrote:
>
> Is it possible to buy a HF/SSB radio that can be used for Marine and ham
> frequencies 2000 to 30000 . How much would a suitable secondhand radio
> cost. How does that compare to buying to separate marine and Ham radios
> I have on my boat a crystal tuned marine HF/SSB with 10 fequencies 2 to
> 8 and would like to get somthing more versitle fo long range cruising
>
> VLV8987

You need to get a marine radio, since generally speaking their tech
specifications are somewhat more exacting than amateur gear. Various
international and national rules specify what marine rigs must do
in order to qualify for service. Those rules are always more stringent
than amateur radio rules.

If you have a valid amateur license (a MUST), you may then operate your
marine ssb rig on the ham bands without difficulty, provided such use
does not violate any watch-keeping regulations.

While most newer ham rigs WILL work on the marine bands (usually with a
simple modification), such a practice is not recommended, except in
cases of distress.

Look into radios from Skanti (SAIT) for marine ssb. They are very well
built and effective. Furuno also makes a good unit. You can expect
to pay in the neighborhood of 10,000 USD for one, substantially less
for used.

Happy sailing!

--
George J. Molnar
Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Amateur Radio: KF2T@N0QCU.#NECO.CO.USA.NOAM
http://www.interealm.com/p/gmolnar/index.html


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Chris Hinkle )
Subject: MARS/CAP for FT-840
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 02:46:14 GMT

 Would appreciate the having or knowing where to fing MARS/CAP mods for
Yeasu FT-840.

 TNX N7UJU Gilbert, AZ






From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:56 1996
From: "Irina N. Borisova" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: metal detecting
Date: 18 Mar 1996 23:43:47 +0300
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

     I look for contacts with metal detectors and other searching
technique creators for information exchange.
     M.B.
     [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:57 1996
From: yaesu FT40R <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: mod for yaesu ft-40r
Date: 19 Mar 1996 19:02:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4in0c8$7a0$[e-mail]>

     I recently purchased a Yaesu FT 40R 440 Mhz Ht.  I've been
told that there is a mod available to make the radio transmit
out of band.  I want to use this radio on my company's
commercial channels.  Does anyone have information about this
mod?  Thanks.

--
Peter Abraham
KA6ZNR
103077,[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Young)
Subject: MOD Wanted: FT-1000MP
Date: 20 Mar 96 03:31:32 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Wanted:

I'm looking for the all band TX/RX mod for the Yaesu
FT-1000MP. If anyone can help drop me a note.

73 de N9MSS  Bob


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:52:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ted Culin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Modifications for Yaesu FT-2500M
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:24:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7at5$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Does anyone know if the out of band mods for the FT-2400H are the same
as the FT-2500M?  If they are not does anyone have a source for the
2500 mods?  Thanks in advance.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:00 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for IC-P4AT
Date: 16 Mar 1996 01:10:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4id4e8$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Pretty self explanatory, I'm looking for extended coverage mods for the IC-P4A
T.
I'm interested in trying to make coverage from 430-450 if possible.

Thanks, Steve
   N2RWE


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Black)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,sbay.hams
Subject: Mods for Kenwood TH-59 or TH-89?
Date: 17 Mar 1996 19:43:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4ihq19$[e-mail]>
Keywords: TH-59 TH-89 Kenwood mods

Looking for info on mods to extend TX/RX coverage of Kenwood
TH-59 (23cm) and TH-89 (70cm/23cm) HTs. These radios, to the
best of my knowledge, are only available in Japan and haven't
been released on the US market.

Thanks,

Dave KE6AJC


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert F. Guba)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Standard C168A ?
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 03:09:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4il8jl$[e-mail]>

I am interested in a source for describing what type of mods can be
made on the Standard C168A handheld.



Bob Guba
Amateur Radio: W1QMN
19 T 296326 4706643 WGS84
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Home Page: http://www.ultranet.com/~rfguba/





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:02 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Yaesu FT-8500
Date: 14 Mar 1996 16:35:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4i9hsl$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have the service manual for the FT-8500 and it gives all sorts of neat info
on the
digital Alignment mode, but I've looked at it numerous times and can't find an
y
thing to suggest any other mods...  Please e-mail if you can find anything!

  Steve - N2RWE


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kevin Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods/ Hidden features for TM-742 wanted
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:48:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4id9as$[e-mail]>

Hi, I have just brought a Kenwood TM-742A Transceiver with the 1.2GHz
module fitted. I have been able to get the mod to extend the frequency
and the extra memories, but I would like to know if there is any other
mods and/or hidden features to this rig.

I saw in an artical with the TM-741 that there was a few hidden
features in that rig, but none of the commands that I have work with
the TM-742A.

If you can help I would be gratful.

Regards

Kevin  (ZL1UDD).




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael J Funaro)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Motorola P-100 UHF portable
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:47:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4i59dl$[e-mail]>

For sale Motorola P-100 UHF, two channel programmable,
450-470 Mhz, excellent condition with rapid charger.
$175 shipped.

Thanks, Mike WA0SWJ
[e-mail]
515-961-6140



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need help programming an IC-U200
Date: 15 Mar 1996 13:08:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4ibq41$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Michael Brown <[e-mail]> writes:
>I bought an Icom IC-U200 land mobile radio at the hamfest last weekend,
>and I need some help programming it. The owner said that the only way he
>knew to program it was with the radio's "brother" handheld. I guess you
>take some data signal out of the handheld and pipe it into the 5 pin mic
>plug on the mobile.
>Does anyone have a U200 and have programmed it? Icom will program it for
>me, but for $65!
>Please respond through email...
>Michael Brown
>Eli Lilly & Company                   Indianapolis, IN
>PP-ASEL-I - based at HFY, Greenwood, IN    Ham - KG9DW

I'll send an email reply as well but here's the info from a Programming
Manual for the IC-H16/IC-U16, IC-U2, IC-V100/IC-U400, IC-U200. The IC-U200
is shown as only being programmable by "cloning" from an IC-U16 via a
cloning cable (OPC-168) which connects to the radio's mic jack.

I can't imagine any dealer charging $65 for this procedure. Seems rather
steep. Suggest looking for another dealer. Also, if you can locate another
amateur near you with an IC-U16 portable, all you need is a OPC-168
Cloning Cable.

So the IC-U16 portable can program or clone to other U16 portables (OPC-129
cable), to the U2 portable (OPC-129 cable), to a U400 mobile (OPC-138 cable),
or to the U200 mobile as stated above. The V-100 and U-400 mobiles can also
be pregrammed using the EX-494 Frequency Programmin Unit. And a V-100 can
clone to another V-100 (OPC-133 cable), and a U-400 can clone to another
U-400 (OPC-133 cable).

These are great wide-band portables and mobiles in VHF and UHF - but as
with most commercial gear, programming can be annoying. At least the
portables are self-programmed using their own keypads (except the IC-U2).

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:06 1996
From: Michael Brown <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need help programming an IC-U200
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 16:02:45 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I bought an Icom IC-U200 land mobile radio at the hamfest last weekend,
and I need some help programming it. The owner said that the only way he
knew to program it was with the radio's "brother" handheld. I guess you
take some data signal out of the handheld and pipe it into the 5 pin mic
plug on the mobile.

Does anyone have a U200 and have programmed it? Icom will program it for
me, but for $65!

Please respond through email...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael Brown
Eli Lilly & Company                   Indianapolis, IN
PP-ASEL-I - based at HFY, Greenwood, IN    Ham - KG9DW


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl H Nord)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Manual Geave GTX-600
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 18:17:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4ihaa0$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Help,
I picked up a Genave GTX-600  6  mtr FM Rig, and it needs some
attention.
Anyone have, or know of a source for a manual with a schematic and
alignment procedure ?
Thanks,
Carl Nord
WA1KPD



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:08 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Tim Murray <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Need Mods for IC2000H
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
References: <4hilkj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 04:09:59 GMT

Remove D8 Chip diode on logic unit. This opens up TX. Factory
Rx is 118-174.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:09 1996
From: Pete Dziomba <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need serv. man. for Knwd TR-9130.
Date: 18 Mar 1996 04:08:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4iinkc$[e-mail]>

I need a copy of the service manual for a Kenwood TR-9130... I'll pay for
all copying and shipping costs... Thanks, Pete [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Donald M. Ross)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need serv. man. for Knwd TR-9130.
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 01:15:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4il18h$[e-mail]>
References: <4iinkc$[e-mail]>

In article <4iinkc$[e-mail]>, Pete Dziomba
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>I need a copy of the service manual for a Kenwood
TR-9130... I'll pay for
>all copying and shipping costs... Thanks, Pete
[e-mail]
>
Me too

73's  NL7CO  Don Ross

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:11 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: NiCad vs. GelCell for 12V 4AH batt'y
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 18:30:56 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (JT) writes:
>Well this may get some flames so I'll put on the ole asbestos suit :)
>
>From what I gathered from "the handbook"  lead acids work best for
>applications that have a "short" draw and don't cycle all the way
>down.  For example, in your car the starter draws heavily for a short
>period of time, but for the most part the battery is "floated" at
>13.8v.

That's true of automotive starting batteries, but there also exist
deep cycle marine and traction batteries which are much more tolerant
of deep discharge. And there's the Edison cell (lead-iron chemistry)
which the phone company has been using forever for plant power.

>Nicads, if you believe in the memory effect, work best if
>the application drains them almost completely and then they are
>recharged completely.

Memory effect is mostly myth. It can only occur under very special
conditions, conditions no amateur is ever likely to encounter. A
different effect, sometimes mistakenly called memory, but correctly
termed voltage depression, can result from *overcharging* NiCad
batteries. If you don't have a smart NiCad charger, that's easy
to do with a straight timed charger unless you know the state of
charge of the battery before commencing charging. One way to know
the state of charge is to fully discharge the cells first, but
you have to be very very careful about doing this to NiCad *packs*
since you can easily reverse a cell due to the weakest cell in
the pack becoming fully discharged first. Reversing a cell will
certainly damage the pack.

>One shouldn't float Nicads like you do with
>lead acids.  If I remember correctly, the handbook indicates that
>Nicads have 10 times the number of full discharge cycles vs. lead
>acid.

The typical number of full charge-discharge cycles for a NiCad cell
is around 500, more if only partial charge-discharge cycles are used.
Due to inefficiencies in the chemistry, some amount of ultimate
capacity is lost every time you cycle the chemicals. The total
number of amp-hrs you can get from a cell is roughly 500*A where
A is the cell's amp-hr rating. You can do that with a relatively
few full cycles, or a bunch of partial cycles.

Another chemistry with better capacity/mass is NimH, such as is
used in newer laptop computers and handheld cellular phones. These
cells too require fairly special charging and discharging to achieve
maximum life. They are more costly than NiCads at present, and NiCads
are in turn more costly than lead-acid batteries of equal capacity.
If you need bulk storage cheap, lead-acid or lead-iron remain the way
to go. If you must have minimum weight for a given capacity, regardless
of cost or complexity, then NimH is the way to go.

But if capacity/mass is the overriding concern, then you must turn
to primary cells such as the ordinary alkaline cells, the newer
lithium cells, or to zinc-air batteries.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (Face2fce)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Packet station for sale
Date: 17 Mar 1996 15:01:49 -0500
Message-ID: <4ihr3d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Face2fce)

         Hello,

                 I have for sale an AEA PK-88 tnc, with a PACE
Communicator II (older 2 meter radio, 15 watts high pwr, 5 low) both
powered by a Micronta rewgulated power suplly.  Excellent condition, ready
to go station just needs computer with serial port.  comes with comm
program also.  price = $100.00

                     If interested e-mail me:           [e-mail]

                      73's   -  Tim (KD6YIU)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bark)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Parts source for used mics??
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 23:37:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4iq53d$[e-mail]>

Trying to find used GE Portamobile speaker/mic
Ideas?

Thanks, Bark



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Fellhauer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: PC to FT-51R Interface Cable
Date: 13 Mar 1996 21:08:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

On Sun, 3 Mar 1996 07:57:20 GMT, [e-mail] (Stephen Lui) wrote:

>Can I construct a PC to FT-51R interface cable with just DB-9 connector, a
>1/8" stereo phone jack, and some cable? Does anyone have a wiring diagram?
>I plan to use the cable with EZ Clone, and the cost is the software is $15
>less w/o the cable.

It isn't that simple.  I pulled the hood off my ADMS-1 cable and there
are several discrete components inside, including a DIP chip.  It is
my assumption that this is a TTL converter.  Spend the 15 bucks, it
would probably cost you more in components and effort to try and make
your own cable.  I just made a custom interconnect for two
(supposedly) DDC compliant products, an STB Video card and an Iiyama
monitor--that wouldn't talk to each other.  Total cost was over ten
bucks for two high density 15 pin d-subs, a double-ended hood, solder,
and jumper wires.  Not to mention the two electronic component stores
I had to visit -- a round trip of over 50 miles, plus my time.  My
boss would of gladly paid 15 dollars for the same thing delivered to
our office door.

>
>The Yaesu newsletter said a clone cable can be made from two stereo 1/8"
>phone plugs and some cable.

Correct.  But the radio was designed to do this.


I hope this helps.

73 .

Mark Fellhauer  KC7BXS
[e-mail].



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex Inc-still ar
Date: 16 Mar 1996 23:21:02 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Alan Raskind <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Mike Morris wrote:
>>
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: Periphex Inc-still around?
>>
>> R>Myself and 3 friends all ordered batteries from Periphex for IC-W2A Icom
>>  >handhelds. All 3 cases broke around the mount within 2 months. Periphex
>>  >refused to honor their "1 year warranty" and all 3 had to be tossed.
>>
>> R>DO NOT BUY FROM PERIPHEX! You will regret it!
>>
>> I have a friend that purchased a Periphex replacement insert
>> booth at an ARRL convention.  He misplaced it, and 14 months later
>> foudn it and gave it to me.
>> Before opening the heat-sealed plastic bag that the factory
>> packages the inserts in I noticed that two of the cells
>> were reversed during manufacture.
>> I pointed this out to my friend and asked him if he still had the
>> receipt so I could exchange it. He was upset at himself that he
>> hadn't noticed it, and mailed the receipt to me the next day.
>>
>> I laid the battery pack on the xerox machine at the office, and made a
>> "picture" clearly showing the reversed cells, the label, and the
>> receipt, all of which I faxed to Periphex, with a letter requesting
>> an exchange insert. After all, I figured that a manufacturing defect
>> should be an exchange item (especially on a factory sealed batery).
>> In the same letter I also requested a quote on two additional inserts-
>> at that time I had 4 batteries, one of which was good, two pretty
>> good, and one dead.
>>
>> The response from Periphex was a fax stating, rather rudely:
>> a) it's not our problem, talk to your vendor, and
>> b) it's past warranty anyway (didn't matter that their
>> sealed plastic bag had never been opened and that was
>> visible in the fax and stated in the letter).
>>
>> I have one of their oversize batteries for my radio; it also
>> broke at the area right at the top where the battery attaches to
>> the radio. The fault is really the Yaesu design staff; they did not
>> leave enough thickness in that area for the type of plastic used.
>> Periphex could make a number of friends if they would sell replacement
>> case pieces. I can understand their reluctance - people could buy the
>> pieces and maye their own batteries. There is a way around that:
>> sell only to existing customers, and require the broken case be sent
>> back. The original message from Reed above references 3 lost customers,
>> All of them could have been salvaged as customers if they would
>> sell replacement shells. I was willing to send back the battery,
>> as I did, and pay to have the shells replaced.
>>
>> Additional personal past experience as been that their engineering
>> department has no interest in listening to outside people- I offered
>> a couple of ideas and was told "we're not interested in outside
>> ideas" (a direct quote!) - does this sound like the "Not Invented Here"
>> syndrome that's mentioned in business school?
>>
>> So they have lost me as a customer for good; one that was consistently
>> worth about $700-900 per year in referred and direct orders. For a
>> company of their size, that's not much in the corporate yearly bottom
>> line, but they can't afford to piss off too many customers and survive.
>> An old business school line is that it takes years to make a customer,
>> seconds to lose one. And one lost is really 10 lost because they
>> talk to each other.
>>
>> I was in Portland OR for several months last year, and went to a couple
>> of the local club meetings with a local friend. At one of the
>> after-meeting coffee shop get-togethers a new ham asked "Where can I
>> get a good battery pack for my handheld besides Icom?", before I
>> could open my mouth several other hams at the pizza party said "avoid
>> Periphex!" - and these were several of the prominent local hams.
>>
>> A friend who owned a hardware store years ago once told me that
>> as long as his only contact with a vendor was as one more order
>> form with a stapled check he'd never really get to know the vendor.
>> He said that it's when your order or request is a little out of the
>> ordinary and you start communicating with a decision-maker rather
>> than a order-taker that a vendors true colors show. He was right.
>> I am now exploring other vendors. All I am looking for is to
>> be treated the way I'd treat a customer at my business.
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Mike Morris                                [e-mail]
>
>Mike,
>
>I read your posting (and the rest of the thread) on Periphex with great
>interest.  My experience fortunately has not been nearly that bad, but I
>think that's because I bought their batteries just after they started
>selling them.  My batteries seemed to hold relatively well.  The cases
>were well made, but one fit very snug and one was somewhat loose.
>
>I guess my real question is that if Periphex doesn't want to support the
>amateur community, who should we go to for batteries other than the OEM
>HT suppliers?  I personally have never bought any W&W Associates
>batteries because I had "heard" that their cases were NOT well made and
>fit was poor.  Don't have any first hand knowledge on the quality of the
>NiCads they use or how they hold up.  I am tempted to go to them instead.
>
>So, if we hams stick together, companies that don't want to support us on
>righteous issues, such as factory reversed batteries, etc., we should go
>elsewhere.
>
>I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
>other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
>with W&W Associates.
>
>How are their batteries?
>Case quality and fit?
>Life expectancy?
>Nicad memory?
>What about their Master Charger I that uses "delta negative voltage
>detection" with the custom charging "cups"?
>Does it work OK?
>Does this charging method help improve the life of the battery?
>What about the quality of the cups and chargers themselves?
>
>Info on any other suppliers?
>
>I'm sure that most of us will be very interested in these postings.
>
>Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC
Alan,
I have been using W&W batteries for several models and brands of
radios for several years now and other than the case finish, I like
them and have had very good luck with them. I have also used their
Master Charger 1 for quite awhile and like it also. I use their
charger for HT's that a 12 volt rapid charger is not available for.
This is great when you are out working ARES or SARC as you don't
usually have the comfort of house current for most rapid chargers.
Good Luck with them
Bill
N0EVG


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:19 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Please identify this Halicrafter.
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:02:37 GMT
Reply-To: [e-mail]
References: <4ijm1r$[e-mail]>

In <4ijm1r$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Edward Soniat du Fo
ssat Jr) writes:
>Gentle Reader:
>
>What is this radio, how old is it and should I repair or replace.
>
>It is a Halicrafter.
>
>It has a large half moon dial labeled Tuning (with the h symbol in the middle
)
>It has a smaller half moon dial labeled Band Spread to the right of Tuning.
>It has Two large equal sized knobs one either side of the dials.
>In the lower left it has an AM/CW switch (vertical slider) and speaker/phone
>switch also a vertical slider.
>In the center is has a four position pointer knob for band selection.
>Too the right of the band select is a on/volume switch.
>On the lower right it has a standby/receive switch (vertical slider).
>The dials are covered with some sort of clear plastic.
>The bands are labeled from the inside out in Megacycles .55 -1.6,
>1.7 -5, 5 -14 , and 13.5 - 30.  Some regions are labeled amateur and
>some foreign.
>
>It has two glass tubes, two small dark opaque material tube like
>components in tube like sockets, and two metal encased tube like
>components. It uses 110v AC.  It was reportedly
>functioning but that was over 15 years ago.  There is not a number or
>sticker on it that I could find.  It has been painted so if there was
>anything etched on the cabinet it would be covered.  It doesn't seem to be
>rusty but the rubber bushing that separate the chasis from the housing
>are mostly gone.
>
>Rating on a scale of 0 is run over by a truck and 10 is new this could
>be a 3, in other words it ain't pretty.  My interests are somewhat
>sentimental but my funds are limited, if I could buy a similar radio
>with more modes for the same money I would seriously consider it but I
>would like to get this working again.
>
>Any thoughts.
>
>Ed
>--
> _|  | _ Edward C. Soniat  WE4TFT  Internet:[e-mail]
> _| -|_  Mass transfer:  1854 Bishop's Green Dr
>  |  |   Marietta GA 30062-6079    [phone]
>

SX-24 or 22 maybe??  Describe the connection on the back please.


Mike Stilz
[e-mail]

The thoughts, ideas, and opinions expressed herein are mine and
are not intended to reflect those of my employer.

This message was created and transmited solely via OS/2 applications



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:20 1996
From: Walt Novinger <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Please identify this Halicrafter.
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:35:39 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ijm1r$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

> In <4ijm1r$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Edward Soniat du
Fossat Jr) writes:
> >Gentle Reader:
> >
> >What is this radio, how old is it and should I repair or replace.
> >
> >It is a Halicrafter.
> >
> >It has a large half moon dial labeled Tuning (with the h symbol in the midd
le)
> >It has a smaller half moon dial labeled Band Spread to the right of Tuning.
> >It has Two large equal sized knobs one either side of the dials.
> >In the lower left it has an AM/CW switch (vertical slider) and speaker/phon
e
> >switch also a vertical slider.
> >In the center is has a four position pointer knob for band selection.
> >Too the right of the band select is a on/volume switch.
> >On the lower right it has a standby/receive switch (vertical slider).
> >The dials are covered with some sort of clear plastic.
> >The bands are labeled from the inside out in Megacycles .55 -1.6,
> >1.7 -5, 5 -14 , and 13.5 - 30.  Some regions are labeled amateur and
> >some foreign.
> >
> >It has two glass tubes, two small dark opaque material tube like
> >components in tube like sockets, and two metal encased tube like
> >components. It uses 110v AC.  It was reportedly
> >functioning but that was over 15 years ago.  There is not a number or
> >sticker on it that I could find.  It has been painted so if there was
> >anything etched on the cabinet it would be covered.  It doesn't seem to be
> >rusty but the rubber bushing that separate the chasis from the housing
> >are mostly gone.
> >This sounds like one of the many S-38 variants to me.

The real issue here, however, is the conditipon of the "rubber
bushings"...these are insolatore that keep the cabinet isolated from the
chassis which is HOT! This is an AC-DC set, having one side of the AC
line connected DIRECTLY to the chassis. If your plug or receptacle is
wired incorrectly, and you happen to touch the cabinet and a good ground
at the same time, you'll probably understand what toast feels like!
Forgive the shouting, but DO NOT OPERATE THIS SET WITHOUT AN ISOLATION
TRANSFORMER. At the least, replace the isolation bushings with rubber or
plastic to maintain the insolation. Really.

Walt
--
====================================================================
Walt Novinger                    Real Radios Keep You Warm At Night!
Collector of hollowstate communications receivers and test equipment
[e-mail]          [e-mail]          CI$: 73348,2015
http://www.hooked.net/users/waltn



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:22 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Harmon)
Subject: Re: Q: how to clear a memory in Yaseu FT-51R?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ii4bg$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 22:39:34 GMT

R.D. Miller <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>When you scan channels, it scans only the programmed ones,
>skipping unprogrammed channels. Here's the question: how
>do you change the state of a memory channel from "programmed"
>to "not programmed?"

You have two choices.  In the FT-51R manual see "Masking Memories" pg. 32
and "Memory Skip Scanning" pg. 35.

Skip Scanning: Recall the memory, press (FM), press (MR).  SKIP appears
in the display.  That memory will be omitted while scanning, but is still
active for manual use.

Masking: Recall the memory, press and hold (FM) for 1/2 second until [F]
blinks in the display, then press (MR).  This makes it as good as if it
were never programmed.

What could be simpler?  B-)




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ranson J. Pelt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: QRP
Date: 17 Mar 1996 16:00:13 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] wrote:

> Does anyone know of a QRP mail reflector or newsgroup?
>

Try [e-mail]

In body of message put:  subscribe qrp-l (your call) (your name)

--
Ranson Pelt
[e-mail]
nz4i


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:24 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: QRP
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 20:14:19 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Does anyone know of a QRP mail reflector or newsgroup?

Thanks,

Bill



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:25 1996
From: OLLI TUPPURAINEN <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RA1AOM PADDLE AND STRAIGHT KEYS
Date: 19 Mar 1996 14:34:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4imglg$[e-mail]>

IN BEHALF OF VALERY RA1AOM AND ESKO LESKINEN OH6CI

I,Olli (OH6CT) and Esko (OH6CI) are very good friends of Valery RA1AOM
and we were pleased to see the information about Val`s keys sent by Dave
K8MN.

Unfortunately there was a little misunderstanding and i would like to
inform all those who are interested in Val`s keys that first of all that
making these keys of very high quality is more or less a hobby for Val
and I am not a rep for these keys, just a friend of Val`s

Esko is working in Russia in other business and He knows Valery by this
Hamradio hobby. Esko realized very quickly that Valery makes one of the
best keys in the world. Esko invited him to Finland couple of months ago
to visit SRAL ham event in Kouvola.Esko was sure that there would be
Finnish hams who would be interested in these keys and Valery would be
able to sell few of those keys. Indeed there was lots of interest for
those keys and currently Valery has got atleast 40 keys ordered from him
to Finland,Germany,U.K,and USA.

In principle there are two different models of paddle keys, chromium
plated and marble based in different colours. Also straight key is
available. Val told that one paddle key includes about 50 components.All
of those components are handmade without any machines. To prepare one
paddle key about 4 to 7 days is needed which means that it is not
possible to make a big quantity in a year.

As told earlier making these keys is has been mainly hobby than full time
work for Val Esko has recommended Val to put up a small company by him
self to make these keys. If he is receiving enough of orders he might
take this key making business as a main job for him and by that way
maybe secure a better life for his family.

If you are interested in buying one of his keys you can send a letter to
Esko and Esko will take those letters to Val. Esko comes over every third
week from St Petersburg to Helsinki. Val is going to answer every single
one personally and send a photograph and other information about his keys

Send your  requests to

Esko Leskinen OH6CI  c/o RA1AOM
P.O.BOX 13
01661 VANTAA
FINLAND

p.s I have given already all e-mail requests sent to Dave K8MN to Esko
and Valery has got those reqests by today


Kind Regards

Olli Tuppurainen OH6CT / OH2KVH



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:26 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Martin)
Subject: RADIO REVIEWS
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:37:07 GMT

All:

  QST was said to have published a review of the
following radios (a comparison):

ICW31A ICOM
TH79A(D) KENWOOD
FT51R YAESU

Does anyone have this article? Is it available on the
WWW or Internet? Can someone supply a copy?

David



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Greene)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: radios and motorcycles
Date: 19 Mar 96 21:54:45 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Hi,

I'm thinking about buying a ham handy talkie and using
it on my motorcycle.  I know that Wingers and Harley touring types
use CBs on there bikes and I'm wondering if a special
type of microphone is necessary due to wind noise.  I could
go with either a headset mic/headphone combo or a earphone
and a handheld mic, so info on use of either type would be
appreciated.


My bike is not a touring machine and only has a windshield,
so there is probabaly going to be more wind noise on it.

Please reply via email to [e-mail]


Thanks,
Dave

--


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Luciano Ostrogovich)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RCI-2950
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 22:00:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4icp3m$[e-mail]>

I am looking for the calibration instructions of the RCI-2950. I hope
that somebody may help me. Thanking you in advance.

                                Luciano
--
****************************************




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Wagner)
Subject: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Date: 19 Mar 96 14:43:43 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Our club has an interesting problem with our 2 meter repeater's power
amp.  I was wondering of anyone else has had this problem, or may see
something we have overlooked.

Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.

After an amp has been on-line for a month or two, it's output begins
to fail and it begins to generate very hi power spurs and other
broad-band components.  When the amp is disassembled, we always have
found that the transistor tabs, solder, and any attached Z strips on
one of the finals has been nearly destroyed by what appears to be
arcing.  After the initial failure, any future failures always happen
on the same transistor.  Our repairs have even included reconstucting
the area with silver solder, but this only delays the failure an
extra week or so.

What we've tried (with no success):
-----------------------------------
We have viewed the output of our exiter on a spectrum analyser, and
found it to be totally clean (at least on the bench).  Just in case,
we have tried a second exciter, but got the same result.

We have replaced the original TE Systems power amp with a Mirage
(both rated for repeater service).  Same problem on the new amp.

Converted the system from a dual antenna/BP cavity arrangement to a
fully duplexed single antenna system with a TX/RX Systems duplexer.

Replaced the system power supply with a surplus Lambda lab grade supply.

Our (current) Equipment:
------------------------
-Maggiore ~3 watt repeater exciter.
-Mirage 4 watt in, 120 watt out power amp, typically run at 70 watts output.
-TX/RX Systems 4 cavity duplexer, 2 years old, factory tuned to our frequency.
-Approx. 200' 7/8" 50 ohm hardline
-Antenna Specialist 4 bay antenna SWR measured at the duplexer output
was 1.7:1 (this antenna was replaced last week with a Cushcraft
ARX-270 repeater antenna (new SWR od 1.4:1).  It is too early to tell
if this will solve our problem.


Any input is GREATLY appreciated!
John, N8CID    [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Date: 21 Mar 1996 08:00:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4irjt9$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

>> Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
>> because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.
>>
>> After an amp has been on-line for a month or two, it's output begins
>> to fail and it begins to generate very hi power spurs and other
>> broad-band components.  When the amp is disassembled, we always have
>> found that the transistor tabs, solder, and any attached Z strips on
>> one of the finals has been nearly destroyed by what appears to be
>> arcing.  After the initial failure, any future failures always happen
>> on the same transistor.  Our repairs have even included reconstucting
>> the area with silver solder, but this only delays the failure an
>> extra week or so.

Someone's been reading too much Rich Measures stuff, hi. :-)

Oscillations usually come AFTER the board starts falling apart, not
before. Lots of these little amps aren't cut out for repeater duty, the
components are just too small. Output strip lines and the other components
carrying high RF current deteriorate. These components all affect
stability. The next thing you know the amp is smoking and arcing, totally
detuned, and maybe even oscillating.

One case where the amp oscillates before the strip line and related
components fail is when the load is VERY hi Q, like the cavity on the
repeater. On occasion you can add enough loss between the amp and the
cavity to de-Q the load.  At other times you may need to add a circulator
to stabilize the amp.

Solid state amps, as a general rule, do not "like" high Q loads like
cavities! They don't like heat from repeater operation. Could be either
problem.

BTW, you're running WAY too much power on that Mirage for repeater duty.
Ham amps are just too cheap and designed wrong for CCS duty.

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Stephen F.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RFC/ HAL Communications P38
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 05:47:06 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am requesting comments regarding the Hal Communications Corporation's P38
H.F. DSP modem.  I am planning to use this with my Kenwood TS850S/AT.  Any
particulars to be aware of; such as ACC2 connections?

Thank you for your replies.

Steve in San Diego, CA




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:32 1996
From: Rolfe Tessem <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RFC/ HAL Communications P38
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 08:42:59 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: "Stephen F." <[e-mail]>

Stephen F. wrote:
>
> I am requesting comments regarding the Hal Communications Corporation's P38
> H.F. DSP modem.  I am planning to use this with my Kenwood TS850S/AT.  Any
> particulars to be aware of; such as ACC2 connections?

I've had one for several weeks, and am also using it with a TS850S/AT. I'm ver
y
pleased with it, and at the time I ordered it, HAL was including a copy of
Express 3.5, which is an impressive piece of software and much nicer than the
rather clunky software HAL produces itself. I've used it side-by-side with my
PK-232 and there is simply no comparison -- the HAL blows it away.

It is a pain to wire the 13-pin ACC2 plug, especially since the pins are so
closely spaced. I took the lazy way out and ordered a PK-232/TS850 cable from
AES
(which has the ACC2 plug on one end). I whacked it off about 8 inches from the

connector, wired up the leads to one side of a terminal block, wired the cable
s
from the P-38 to the other and was up and running in only a few minutes. (The
connectors on the P-38 end are just 3 phono plugs and one Sony mini-plug.)

The only thing you could do better by wiring the connector yourself is to use
the
standby pin that cuts out the front-panel microphone connector when in transmi
t
as opposed to the generic standby pin that is wired in the cable AES sells. Th
is
is not an issue when the radio is in FSK mode, since the front-panel microphon
e
connector isn't active in this mode anyway. It's only an issue if you run AFSK
,
which you must do for Clover. All the other modes may be run in straight FSK.
Of
course, you can also simply unplug the microphone :-).

Rolfe
W3VH

--
Rolfe Tessem      |    Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
[e-mail]     |    96 Morton Street
[phone]    |    New York, NY 10014


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:33 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mel)
Subject: Scouting Ham Radio Web...ScoutRadio
Message-ID: <myriadsn-1403961644550001@192.0.2.2>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:44:55 GMT

ScoutRadio at http://www.ecllc.com/bsa319/ham.htm

Put this one in your browser bookmark! For Scouts & Scouter interested in
ham radio. Check our unusual stations that have used the offical call of
Boy Scouts of America (hand lashed wooden hf tower).

Offically endorsed by their "Scout Salute to ScoutRadio". On the list
within the first 5 days online include: ARRL, Gordon West, Kenwood,
Alinco, QRZ, Rockwell Shuttle Support Crew and growing. We are planning on
linking the Scout Salute to ScoutRadio in the next few weeks. Our idea is
to to arrange Scout discounts on ham equiptment similiar to sporting good
stores.

We welcome your clubs or Companies "Scout Salute" after you've visited the
site via email.

73 YIS
Mel ASM


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:35 1996
From: Saul B. Yochelson <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: SGC HF Transceivers
Date: 15 Mar 1996 07:57:27 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4ib7t7$[e-mail]>
References: <4i4i7u$[e-mail]>

In article <4i4i7u$[e-mail]> Mark McPherson,
[e-mail] writes:
>I've been thinking about purchasing an SGC SG-2000 HF transceiver for maritim
e
>mobile use.  I need ITU marine HF transceive capability, a general-coverage H
F
>receiver (for marine weatherfax transmissions) and would like HF ham coverage

>as well; but I really don't want to carry two radios, and the SG-2000 seems t
o
>be one of the few units that is type-accepted for marine HF and has ham-band
>coverage as well.
>
>I have an SGC tuner and am reasonably impressed with its design and
>construction; but nobody stocks the SG-2000 locally and I'm reluctant to
>commit myself without some better information.
>
>Anybody got experiences, pros, cons, or alternatives to offer?
>
>Mark McPherson
>N7NEE

Mark:

We have an SGC-2000 aboard the SS Lane Victory (a WWII Victory ship that
has been turned over to the US Merchant Marine Veterans of WWII and is
now a fully operational ship/museum/memorial berthed in San Pedro, CA).

The radio is basically OK for commercial type communications, that is,
where you can select channels. Its interface is pretty awkward for ham
radio type operations, where you really need a knob that you can turn to
change frequenies. The general human interface is pretty bad, in the
sense that the main controls are through two buttons, one with an up
arrow and the other with a down arrow. Normally these control volumne,
but they also can be used to change frequencies, etc. There is no
indication of the mode of the these buttons; it is real easy to get
confused about what will happen if you push one.

If you intend to use the radio for CW, it is very awkward because you
have to manually calculate and enter the transmitting offset frequency.
Just about every ham radio I know of does this internally. If you connect
a key through the key connection in the back of the radio, no side tone
is generated; if you want to hear a side tone, you have to connect the
key in parallel with the PTT switch on the microphone.

Reliablility of the radio has been, in my opinion, pretty mediocre. We
had to replace the cpu soon after we got the radio and found several
intermittent solder bridges in one of the internal connectors. Right now
buttons 6 through 9 on the keypad sometimes work and sometimes don't
(they are all on one bus of a matrix). Also the internal battery is dead;
this is the second one and the radio is only 2 years old.

Also, be sure to get a good husky power supply. We are using an ASTRON 35
Amp supply and find that it is marginal when the radio is tuned to
frequencies around the 80-meter ham band (i.e. around 4 MHz)

On the otherhand, the SGC tuner seems to work fine.

Saul WA6VEN

Reply to:
        [e-mail] or [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carlos)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SSTV for WINDOWS
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:15:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4ii9ke$[e-mail]>

        Hi there. Does anybody knows where I can look for an SSTV soft for
windows? Please reply to [e-mail]

73 Carlos



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Aust)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Subject: IC-W31A Opinions Sought
Date: 13 Mar 96 15:41:58 GMT
Message-ID: <9603131541.AA04237@shelob>

Jack,
 I just got an Icom W31A and it a real great radio on UHF. It has
great sensitivity on UHF receive from 410-512Mhz with no image responses
like I found in the Kenwood TH78A.
 I got my TH79A(D) to receice above 470Mhz, but it has images like the TH78A
and gets real deaf above 500Mhz.
 Also I was really considering the FT51R, but signals fro 480- 512 Mhz were
much stronger, and I was impressed. It was more sensitive than my Commerical
Bendix-King handheld I use in the 512 region for Reserve and Search & Rescue
operations.
 Icom really did wonders on the out of band receive on the W31A!!
I can hear the National Weather Service UHF links at 410Mhz great
60 miles away, Forestry links 100miles away at 415Mhz, 486Mhz , 512Mhz
were just as sensitive as in band 440-450MHz.

 Comparing this to the FT51R, I had to put a 5/8 long whip to hear the
same signal about S1(with images), but with a mini-duck antenna on the W31A,
the signals were S9-S10 (no images).
 I suspect with the FT51R, that the image frequency causes the RF to IF
noise figure to be 3 db higher. The thermal noise from thehigh gain front
end causes USB and LSB noise floors to fold into the same IF. The sensitivity
is best in the 440-450Mhz band.
 With the Icom W31A, I note the same sensitivity across the 400-530Mhz range.
 Next I took a signal generator to both units and injected a sigal at the
image when listening to the Ft51R, in the case of the W31A, the level of the
generator has to be raised about 30dB before it was detected, whereas in the
FT51R, it was easy to detect.
 I guess you could say the RF to IF noise figure is much better on the
Icom W31A, compared to the Yaesu FT51R on UHF. I really like the scanning
PL-decode feature on the W31A.
 I hope this helps you Jack.
73
Mike
WB6DJI



 On the
common IF
are




Subject: IC-W31A Opinions Sought

Would appreciate any comments on the ICOM W31A, pro or con.  Any info on
RX sensitivity at about 500MHz would also be helpful  Thanks, Jack KA3OTU.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: SWR Field expediant
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 08:47:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4ij88r$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

>Can I use this meter to check SWR on a CB radio?

Yet another troll . . .


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:39 1996
From: Geoff Brown <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Tempo 2004
Date: 19 Mar 1996 08:35:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4ilrk4$[e-mail]>

For Sale:
Tempo 2004 432MHz amplifier, under 100 qso's
Unmarked as new.Lost interest in the band.
750 pounds

Also have 4 times 23 cm ants with stacking frame and
power splitter, offers?

...Regards Geoff



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Fellhauer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Tempo MPP-1 Printing TNC
Date: 15 Mar 1996 15:35:00 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I recently aquired a Tempo MPP-1 TNC and am interested in starting a
dialog with any other Tempo/AR1200 owners.

Specifically, I am looking for the 5-pin Mini-DIN-like TNC to radio
connector.  A call to Henry Radio was of little help as they no longer
distribute the unit, nor do they have any more cables.  I have been
able to find the female part of this connector locally. but no one has
ever seen a cable like this that I can find in the Phoenix area.  Does
anyone know of a supplier for these connectors?

Also, I only have the basic manual and would gladly pay a small fee
for a copy of the technical manual/schematic.  Even a complete
breakdown of the MPP-1's unique commands would be helpful.

I am aware of the birdie this unit causes on 145.01.  I'm aware there
is a cure, but what is it?

I understand the 80 mm paper rolls are difficult and expensive to
find.  Does anyone know of a good supplier for this paper?  I'm also
aware, as I used to work in a print shop, that it is quite possible to
buy wider thermal paper rolls and cut them down with a band saw.  Has
anyone done this?

Generally, I am interested in any tidbits, dirt, amusing anecdotes,
unusual uses, etc. of the Tempo MPP-1/AR1200.

Please respond via personal e-mail.

73,

Mark Fellhauer  KC7BXS
ThunderBird ARC packet coordinator
[e-mail]




Are there any interesting hacks/mods/Easter Eggs for this


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Harry)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ten Tec and equipment for sale
Date: 15 Mar 1996 02:44:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4ialj2$[e-mail]>
References: <4hr2s2$[e-mail]>

Thank you for the response.  The MFJ swr analyzer is sold.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Brannick)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:41:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4id9m4$[e-mail]>

Would like to get some opinions as to how this rig stacks up against
the other radios in its price class.. like the FT-990 or the TS-850. I
would kinda like to support an US made product, as long as to compares
favorably with the competition.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joseph Clarke)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TenTec Triten IV for Sale
Date: 13 Mar 1996 02:54:04 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4i5dcc$[e-mail]>

For Sale

TenTech Triten IV.  Mike and manual included.  Good shape.
$175 takes it.  Post replies here.

Joseph



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:44 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: TenTec Triten IV for Sale
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4i5dcc$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:18:43 GMT

I'll take it.


Joseph Clarke ([e-mail]) wrote:
: For Sale

: TenTech Triten IV.  Mike and manual included.  Good shape.
: $175 takes it.  Post replies here.

: Joseph


--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clark Savage Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TenTec Triten IV for Sale
Date: 19 Mar 1996 08:34:36 -0800
Message-ID: <4imnms$[e-mail]>
References: <4i5dcc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In <[e-mail]> Isaac Kohn <[e-mail]
cago.edu> writes:

>> TenTech Triten IV.  Mike and manual included.  Good shape.
>> $175 takes it.  Post replies here.

>> JosephFor those of us that are ignorant, please post a more detailed
>description... I've never heard of that radio, and I'd like to know
>whether it's a xcvr, rcvr or xmitter..... what band(s) does it cover....
>what mode(s).... etc. etc. (power output too maybe?)

For Isaac and others interested - The Ten Tec Triton IV is a
1979 vintage fully solid state (one of the very first) HF SSB/CW
transceiver.  It covers 80-10 meters not including WARC.  Has
full break in CW, and it works well.  There was an analog version
and a digital readout (actually a frequency counter, not a readout
on todays rigs) version.  It is not small, but is pretty darned
light.  Needs 12 volts at about 20 amps to run.  Very low current
drain on receive.  No microprocessors inside, except in the
frequency counter version.

I had a few of these and they are darned good basic radios.  Worth
every penny of $175 and more when in good shape with accessories.
I inquired about this radio but I believe it had sold in moments...

Clark
WA3JPG




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:46 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trans-O as Extra ?
Date: 15 Mar 1996 03:54:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4iapko$[e-mail]>

Hello Z folk-

A friend who had just seen "White Squall" inquired as to the
model number of the Zenith TO seen as setpiece in cabin
of the 4-master in this story set in early 50s. Anybody
see the flick...what is T-O, and was Jeff Bridges able to
figure out how to extend the antenna or open up the rig? White
Squall is playing at a theater near....
BTW...I have a theater speaker system composed of an 18" and
15" EV Electro-Voice drivers and hefty l/C xover. Any idea
of worth of such?
Thanks   Jim Dillon    [e-mail]
Seeking National NC-100X, other Tuning Eye Gear


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:46 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Chip Adams)
Subject: TS-450 BC band sensitivity mod?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:48:11 GMT

Is there a mod, similar to that available for the TS-850, to increase
broadcast band (.5 to 1.7 MHz) sensitivity in the 450?  Alternatively,
does anyone know how the sensitivity (in that freq. range) of the
Icom 706 compares to the Kenwoods (modified or otherwise)?

The goal here is decent NAVTEX reception (518 KHz).

Please reply by email, as posts take up to a week to arrive here.  Thanks...

Chip, K7LR
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:47 1996
From: Randall Rhea <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Uniden HR2600 mods?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:03:13 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hlrfv$[e-mail]>
To: RH <[e-mail]>

RH wrote:
>
> Looking for mod for Uniden HR2600 to open up 11m band.
>                 Thanks Ron

The only way I know of is to buy a Chipswitch.  They advertised in ham
magazines.  They are out of Santa Rosa, California.  I do not know if
they
are still in business.

They sell a replacement microprocessor for the 2600.  I found it to be
very
difficult to install correctly.  It does open up the unit to 11m, and it
adds more memories.

The 2510 can be modified, but not the 2600.  Hence the 2510 tends to be
more popular.

--

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randall Rhea                                        Systems Engineer
Informix Software                                   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael T. Hodgson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted ICOM AT500
Date: 18 Mar 1996 20:29:08 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

wanted at500 for the Icom 751A series radio...must be clean and operational.

Thanks

Mike

reply to: [e-mail]

--
Mike - Raleigh, NC USA

Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not in any way
represent those of my employer.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:49 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Martin)
Subject: WANTED RADIO & SCANNER MODIFICATIONS
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:39:36 GMT

All:

Where are some good sites to find RADIO and SCANNER
modifications for AOR, Yeasu, Kenwood and/or ICOM?

David

PS Or Radio Shack, etc.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Randy Padawer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: WANTED--Speaker for Radio Shack DX-160
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 12:49:11 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I'm looking for someone's old speaker for the Radio Shack Realistic
DX-160.  (No flames, please... It's not my primary receiver, heh.)  If
anyone has such a unit, please email me at [e-mail]

Thanks!

Randy Padawer, WA4FJF
[e-mail]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Randy Padawer,  P.O. Box 1167,  Knoxville, TN  37901-1167   U.S.of A
Internet: [e-mail]    AOL: Ad Randy     Tel.: [phone]
Department of Psychology,  University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.
--------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jeff London)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted-Yaesu FT-757GX Manual and computer interface equipment
Date: 17 Mar 1996 06:06:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4iga55$[e-mail]>

I have a YAESU FT-757GX but didn't get the manual...I am trying to
interface the radiuo with a logging program and need the computer
interface to get it working...Anyone Please

Thanks    Ben   WB7QIG

email     [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:52 1996
From: "George J. Molnar" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Wanted-Yaesu FT-757GX Manual and computer interface equipment
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 10:10:28 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4iga55$[e-mail]>
To: Jeff London <[e-mail]>

Jeff London wrote:
>
> I have a YAESU FT-757GX but didn't get the manual...I am trying to
> interface the radiuo with a logging program and need the computer
> interface to get it working...Anyone Please

Check Feb 1993 QST, pages 37-41 for an interface diagram and pinouts
for the control connector.

Since the '757 only accepts data (frequency), and doesn't report
anything back, I never did build the thing. So, I can't vouch for
performance, etc.

Good luck!


--
George J. Molnar
Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Amateur Radio: KF2T@N0QCU.#NECO.CO.USA.NOAM
http://www.interealm.com/p/gmolnar/index.html


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:52 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Wanted: Catalog of used radio gear and specs...
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:22:41 GMT


Does anyone know of an on-line reference or a printed catalog that would give
would-be buyers of ham radio gear info on older radios?  I am in the market
for a 2m all-mode, but currently have no way of knowing what make/models have
been manufactured or what the capabilities of a particular model might be.
For example, what frequency range, what modes, what power, what sensitivity,
what selectivity, what # of memories, repeater splits or not, CTCSS or not,
DTMF or not, etc.  A book would be fine, but an Internet resource would be
even better.  Does anyone know of such information?

Signed,
KB2TCG in Fairport, NY
[e-mail]

P.S.  STILL LOOKING FOR THAT 2M ALL-MODE...



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (SILVER WOLF)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Dead or Alive
Date: 16 Mar 1996 02:07:49 -0800
Message-ID: <4ie3tl$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (SILVER WOLF)

Greetings,

  If you have any communications equipment dead or alive you don't need, i
need it!  This will work best if your around central Oregon cause I can't
pay much more than shipping and/or a few bucks.  Please!,

Good speed to you modem
Silver Wolf
SILVER [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott KF6BRP)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 23:23:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4iko1q$[e-mail]>

Well, it doesn't hurt to ask. :)

I just passed my 5 wpm and should pass the 13 next month, but I still
don't have/can't afford a radio! Does anyone have any old, unwanted,
working, equipment laying around? All my resources are going to my new
baby, but I can afford whatever shipping is required.

Don't bother flaming me for asking, and thanks in advance.

Scott Bains-Jordan
KF6BRP
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steven Fritts)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 03:32:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4ila08$[e-mail]>
References: <4iko1q$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Scott KF6BRP) wrote:

>Well, it doesn't hurt to ask. :)

>I just passed my 5 wpm and should pass the 13 next month, but I still
>don't have/can't afford a radio! Does anyone have any old, unwanted,
>working, equipment laying around? All my resources are going to my new
>baby, but I can afford whatever shipping is required.

>Don't bother flaming me for asking, and thanks in advance.

>Scott Bains-Jordan
>KF6BRP
>[e-mail]

If you can afford a baby and an Internet account you can afford a
radio.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jerry B. Altzman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: 19 Mar 1996 10:32:56 -0500
Message-ID: <4imk38$[e-mail]>
References: <4iko1q$[e-mail]> <4ila08$[e-mail]>

In article <4ila08$[e-mail]>, Steven Fritts <[e-mail]> wrote:
>[e-mail] (Scott KF6BRP) wrote:
>>working, equipment laying around? All my resources are going to my new
>>baby, but I can afford whatever shipping is required.
>>Scott Bains-Jordan

>If you can afford a baby and an Internet account you can afford a
>radio.

Hardly. You can't feed your baby QSL cards.

Now, kindly crawl back under that bridge and go back to scaring villagers
passing overhead.

//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman   Entropy just isn't what it used to be      [phone]
[e-mail]   [e-mail]                KE3ML


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:53:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (PhilRut1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: 19 Mar 1996 15:48:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4in6iu$[e-mail]>
References: <4imk38$[e-mail]>

In article <4imk38$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Jerry B. Altzman) writes:

>Now, kindly crawl back under that bridge and go back to scaring villagers
>passing overhead.
>
>

 That's pretty crass from someone who's looking for something for nothing!


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:00 1996
From: "dave . n7da" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: Ten-Tec Model 282 IF Filter
Date: 20 Mar 1996 03:00:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4insbh$[e-mail]>

Wanted:

    Ten-Tec Model #282 If Filter

tnx, dave.n7da



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:01 1996
From: "dave . n7da" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: Ten-Tec Model 282 IF Filter
Date: 20 Mar 1996 03:00:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4inscs$[e-mail]>

Wanted:

    Ten-Tec Model #282 If Filter

tnx, dave.n7da



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:03 1996
From: [e-mail](S)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: 17 Mar 1996 00:54:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4ifnrs$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In <[e-mail]>
[e-mail] (Peter Neidhardt) writes:
 I intermittenly pickup actual radio
>transmissions from overhead commercial airliners.  Does anyone have
any idea what causes this?  I thought
>Commerical Airline bands were totally different and not even close to
the
>FM bands.

You are receiving civilian air comms on the image frequency of your FM
RX.  The civ air band is 108-136 MHz.  Your FM RX tunes 88-108 and
probably uses a LO at (88->108)+ 10.7 MHz to convert down to an IF at
approximately 10.7 MHz.  This means that strong air signals at
approximately 2*10.7=21.4 MHz above the tuned FM band frequency will
come in.  Your radio is an FM RX, the air comms are AM, so audio may be
distorted or noisy.  Example...if a local tower uses say 120.1 MHz, you
might hear it at about 98.7.
                                        Jim



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Lundgren)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: 19 Mar 1996 01:03:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4il14f$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4iisa8$[e-mail]>

I don't think there is any point in trying to make a silk purse out of a
sow's ear.  He should go get a decent radio receiver rather than try to
patch up a poor one.

Also, it may help more to decrease the signal strength rather than
increase it.

Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ ([e-mail]) penned:
: [e-mail] (Peter Neidhardt) wrote:

: >I own a cheap General Electric boombox... I am on a certain FM channel
: > I intermittenly pickup actual radio transmissions from overhead commercial

: >airliners...
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^snip -to-fit^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

: Paul,

: The aircraft band is right next door to broadcast fm music band.  ADD  your
: fm receiver's  'IF'- frequency (some times 20.x MHz or 10.xMHz) and with a
: strong enough signal from a aircraft right overhead, you may get a  "mix".

: Your aircraft can  'mix'  with your desired station +'IF'   and there you
: have it.  Often even more magic is involved... where two signals transmitt
: at the same time and mix down to your fm receiver.  Infact there is a very
: obscure program (no I don't have it) that calculates where the offending
: signals are and next is to build a filter to trap out at least one of the
: offenders.

: The cure?  Add a external FM Antenna... the better fm antennas look much
: like a TV Antenna, except the elements are almost all the same length...
: Use 300 ohm  'twin-line'  to feed the signal to the set.  Twist the
: twin-line as it passes from antenna, all the way to the set.

: What?   No screw terminals for the two wires?  Then try a random  'long
: wire'  antenna with a alligator clip on the business end and clip it to
: your whip antenna!  You may need to move the long wire around till you find
: the best signal.  This should provide a stronger signal from you FM station
: and hopefully swamp the front-end with 'desired' signal.


: Weinguard makes a FM PASS filter (75 ohm coax 'f' fittings)... this signal
: loves the  FM Brodcast band  and tries it's best to reject other signals
: above and below the band.   Cost, about $12, retail.  I can't vouch for the
: quality of a Radio Shack equiv.  More elabroate 'tunable'  'notch' filters
: can be had, but for lot's more money for one of quality.

: Hope this helps!

: Tony
: WA6IGJ



--
#======P=G=P==k=e=y==a=v=a=i=l=a=b=l=e==u=p=o=n==r=e=q=u=e=s=t======#
|    John Lundgren - Elec Tech - Info Tech Svcs. |    jlundgre@     |
|    Rancho Santiago Community College District  |   deltanet.com   |
|     17th St at Bristol \ Santa Ana, CA 92706   | http://rsc.rancho|
| My opinions are my own, and not my employer's. |    .cc.ca.us     |
|   Most FAQs are available through Thomas Fine's WWW FAQ archive:  |
|http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu:80/hypertext/faq/usenet/FAQ-List.html|
|      "You can flame your brains out -- it won't take long."       |
#===T=u=z=l=a==C=o=m=p=a=n=y=.=.===t=h=r=e=e='=s==L=e==C=r=o=w=d=!==#


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:07 1996
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
From: [e-mail] (Paul Grohe)
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Message-ID: <314e712d.11687875@139.187.128.43>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
References: <[e-mail]> <4idjm1$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 09:52:05 GMT

Whoa guys!

We all agree that it is an image. That's a given!

But putting a bigger antenna on it won't help! If you were standing
next to a jet engine, would you cup your ears to hear it better? Or
would you cover your ears?

If it *is* causing non-linearities in the front-end, overloading it
even more is not going to help (why do you think they put the -20dB
switch on good receivers?).

Try *collapsing* the antenna, or move it around. I know it sounds
strange, but it does work. I lived directly under the path of SFO's
main runway for 20 years and I have experienced almost every type of
interference from airplanes. Cheap radios always received them. With
high quality receivers, you usually would hear a slight drop in audio
level. Like the noise, you just have to live with it. Cheap RFI
filters simply don't work.

The tuners front end contains the resonant circuit which is supposed
to favor the intended signal (101.7) and reject the un-intended ones
(123.1). In cheap radios, this circuit is not very good, so the
rejection (selectivity) goes to pieces. The quality of the IF stages
also has a lot to do with it.

If the radio has a image rejection of 20dB, that means that the
airplane signal has to be at least 100 times more powerful than the FM
station to "break through". Easy to do when the airplane is right
above your head and the FM station is 10 miles away! Capture ratio sez
it only takes a dB or two to override the intended signal. And it does
it!

Your best bet is to try another radio. Some *are* better than others.

On Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:06:42 -0600,
in newsgroup rec.radio.scanner,
Isaac Kohn <[e-mail]>
from Ripco Communications, Inc. thoughtfully posted:

>There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, last time I
> checked!

They still are!

>How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
> transmissions???

FM detectors are capable of detecting AM signals through "Slope
Detection". In a nutshell: If you tune a FM detector off to one side,
you can detect AM. When a FM detector is tuned "dead-on", it will have
the most AM rejection. When it is tuned off resonance, to where the
signal is now riding up-and-down on the steeper outer slopes of the
detector curve, you create an AM detector (the detector curve is
"bell" shaped) Some cheap one IC AM/FM radios use the same detector
for both AM & FM, utilizing slope detection (Note that you have to
disable any AFT circuits, as they will attempt to follow the signal
and keep it centered).

Cheers,
Paul Grohe

---------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul Grohe                     National Semiconductor Corp.
 Sr. Electronics Technician     2900 Semiconductor Drive
 AMPS New Products Eng Group    Mail Stop C2693
 Mailto:[e-mail]    Santa Clara, CA. 95052-8090 USA
 [phone] Tel             [phone] Fax
 Usenet Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed are mine, not NSC's

                 http://www.national.com

   For technical assistance, literature, or samples call:
      NORTH AMERICA                       EUROPE
     [phone]                  (49) 814 110-3720
 mailto:[e-mail]    mailto:[e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Mark)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: 16 Mar 1996 05:30:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4idjm1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (David Mark)


Commercial airline frequencies are just above the statndard FM
broadcast band.  Your radio probably has a "cheap" tuner that
doesn't just zero in on the desired frequency, but is subject to
interference on nearby frequencies when a transmitter operating on
those nearby frequencies is nearby (gee...how many more times could
I squeeze the word "nearby" into that sentence?).

What's happening is your radio is probably tuned to an FM station
near the upper end of the band (around 107-108mhz) and you're
probably under a flight path.  When a plane is nearby (there's
that word again) and the pilot transmits on one of the lower
airline frequencies, your radio's less than discriminating tuner
picks it up.
--
(DAVID MARK) [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Nuetzel)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 15:26:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4imjob$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

>There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, last time I
>checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
>transmissions???

   If close enough, it will.  I have picked up CB radio transmissions (Also
AM) on a nearby FM reciever.

>



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:10 1996
From: Michael J Wooding <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 20:14:59 +0000
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <RP2+ugAD$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, Peter
Neidhardt <[e-mail]> writes
>Does anyone have any idea what causes this?  I thought
>Commerical Airline bands were totally different and not even close to the
>FM bands.

I probably won't know the exact answer due to your location not being in
my area!  However, are you in the proximity of an AGA (Air-Ground-Air)
station, used by Air Traffic Control for AGA communication?  If so then
it is simple breakthrough, as we tend to use quite high powers.

If you do not then I would put the radio up for auction, or patent it!

Regards ... Mike

Michael J Wooding   [e-mail] - CompuServe: 100441,377
WWW: http://www.eolas.co.uk/ag/vhfcomm.htm (hambits.htm & hamclip.htm)
WWW: http://www.clearlight.com/~vhfcomm
Tel: [phone]   Fax: [phone]
KM Publications, 5 Ware Orchard, Barby, Nr.Rugby, CV23 8UF, UK
VHF Communications Magazine - Especially Covering VHF, UHF and Microwaves


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:11 1996
From: Michael J Wooding <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:54:07 +0000
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <sWnjFFAfDxTxEwR$@g6iqm.demon.co.uk>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, Isaac Kohn
<[e-mail]> writes
>checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
>transmissions???

Slope detection

Mike

Michael J Wooding   [e-mail] - CompuServe: 100441,377
WWW: http://www.eolas.co.uk/ag/vhfcomm.htm (hambits.htm & hamclip.htm)
WWW: http://www.clearlight.com/~vhfcomm
Tel: [phone]   Fax: [phone]
KM Publications, 5 Ware Orchard, Barby, Nr.Rugby, CV23 8UF, UK
VHF Communications Magazine - Especially Covering VHF, UHF and Microwaves


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:13 1996
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
From: [e-mail] (Steve Work)
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4imjob$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 17:32:53 GMT

Dennis Nuetzel ([e-mail]) wrote:
: >There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, last time I
: >checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
: >transmissions???

:    If close enough, it will.  I have picked up CB radio transmissions (Also
: AM) on a nearby FM reciever.

"AM rejection" is a spec which applies to FM radios.  It is worse on
cheaper ones.

The circuitry used to detect FM signals can respond to changes in the
amplitude.  Especially when the circuit is cheap, and under conditions
where it is overloaded.


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Lundgren)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: 16 Mar 1996 15:33:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4ien10$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Peter Neidhardt ([e-mail]) penned:
: I own a cheap General Electric boombox (about a $100 in value) that is a
: few years old.  It works well but when I am on a certain FM channel
: listening to my favourite station, I intermittenly pickup actual radio
: transmissions from overhead commercial airliners.  These are actual
: commercial airline communiques to the tower and back.  I know it is
: because the pilot states the airline and other info. like heading and
: other number jumbo stuff.  This is a simple radio with no short wave or
: any extra bells or whistles and it works well except for the fact that
: every so often it interupts the music and I hear aircraft communication
: messages.  Does anyone have any idea what causes this?  I thought
: Commerical Airline bands were totally different and not even close to the
: FM bands.

: Thanks greatly!
: Peter

Commercial airline freqs are right above the FM band.  Your radio is
receiving an image freq and detecting it even to it's AM and not FM.  The
airplane is probably really close, maybe overhead.

Image freqs work something like this.  The IF of the radio is 10.7 MHz,
but let's just use 10 MHz.  The radio station is at 100 MHz.  The IF is
10, so the local oscillator is at 110 MHz.  The receiver can receive at
both the sum and difference of the two, so it can receive at either 100
MHz or 120 MHz.  The 120 MHz is (somewhat) tuned out by the receiver's
tuned circuits leaving the 100 MHz.  But sometimnes the receiver doesn't
do the tuning too well.  And sometimes the unwanted transmitter is real
close, so it gets thru anyway.

If youre using the built-in rabbit ears, make sure they are fully
extended.  If you are always in a certain area, the location may be
affecting the reception of your fav FM station, so try to maximize the
signal by changing the location.  You could also try reducing the signal
strength by putting the antenna in the collapsed position.  Maybe one of
these might help enough to eliminate your problem.

Another boombox might help, too.  I bought some cheap soundesign radio
in a bargain pack along with a flashlight and some batteries.  I liked it
because it received both FM and TV.  But the receiver is atrocious, and
receives all sorts of images of who knows what.  It really sucks, but
what can one expect when buying a radio and flashlight with batteries for
twenty bucks?  Not much, I guess.  The Renewal batteries suck, too. They
try to nail you later for the cost of the recharger!  Forget it.

--
#======P=G=P==k=e=y==a=v=a=i=l=a=b=l=e==u=p=o=n==r=e=q=u=e=s=t======#
|    John Lundgren - Elec Tech - Info Tech Svcs. |    jlundgre@     |
|    Rancho Santiago Community College District  |   deltanet.com   |
|     17th St at Bristol \ Santa Ana, CA 92706   | http://rsc.rancho|
| My opinions are my own, and not my employer's. |    .cc.ca.us     |
|   Most FAQs are available through Thomas Fine's WWW FAQ archive:  |
|http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu:80/hypertext/faq/usenet/FAQ-List.html|
|      "You can flame your brains out -- it won't take long."       |
#===T=u=z=l=a==C=o=m=p=a=n=y=.=.===t=h=r=e=e='=s==L=e==C=r=o=w=d=!==#


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Shaffer, Jr.)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 01:14:13
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>


In article <[e-mail]> Isaac Kohn <ikohn@vertex.u
cls.uchicago.edu> writes:
> There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, last time I
> checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
> transmissions???

All you need to do to decode an AM signal is rectify it.  Any transistor
junction can act as a diode junction under the right circumstances.  I know
someone who gets nearby CB signals on his CD player -- no RF circuits at all,
it's being picked up in the audio amp.

--
 *  From the disk of: | [e-mail]      | "there's a hell of
 Jim Shaffer, Jr.     | NOTICE:  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  //  | a good universe
 37 Brook Street      | I've changed              //   | next door; let's go"
 Montgomery, PA 17752 | Internet providers.    \\//    |     (e.e. cummings)


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Weir)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:12:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4is68q$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4idjm1$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <sWnjFFAfDxTxEwR$@g6iqm.demon.co.uk>

Michael J Wooding <[e-mail]> shared the following
priceless pearls of wisdom:

>In article <[e-mail]>, Isaac Kohn
><[e-mail]> writes
>>checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
>>transmissions???

>Slope detection

>Mike

Ummm...I came within a couple of milliseconds of falling into that
same trap.  Slope detection works for listening to FM on an AM rig;
going the other way around requires imbalance in the ratio detector or
discriminator -- not hard to do on a cheapie radio where the diode
bridge are random diodes thrown into the board.

Jim


Jim Weir VP Engineering | You bet your sweet patootie I speak for the
RST Engineering         | company.  If I don't, ain't nobody gonna.
Grass Valley CA 95945   |
http://www.rst-engr.com | AR Adv WB6BHI--FCC 1/C phone--Cessna 182A N73CQ
[e-mail]        | Commercial/CFI-Airplane/Glider-----A&P Mechanic



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:19 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Monty Wilson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: What do you need for a 2 meter repeater
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 21:43:40 GMT
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (JA Glasscock) wrote:
>Does any body know what I need for starting a repeater, equipment wise? I
>want it to have an autopatch, and CTCSS tones to access it.

You'll need a repeater-shack site at the base of a large tower, with a
phone line or two coming to it, a good 2m antenna way up the tower, and
enough Heliax to reach from the repeater shack up to the antenna.  You
need two 2m radios (the one you use for receive must have a PL tone
decoder, e.g., the Alinco DR-110T) and a set of cavities and someone who
knows how to tune them.  To run the whole thing you need a repeater controller
board with autopatch.  You'll need a frequency-pair, which are pretty easy to
get EXCEPT on the 2m band, in which case you'll have to apply to your local
2m governing body and get on a waiting list.

--
.........Monty.
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: 16 Mar 1996 08:52:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4ieh29$[e-mail]>
References: <4idpfr$[e-mail]>

In article <4idpfr$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Dim-US Co.)
writes:

> Are you looking for LOW COST, HIGH QUALITY China Products?

Hmmm. Sounds like a oxymoron to me. The middle modifier doesn't fit.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 08:16:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4ij6du$[e-mail]>
References: <4idpfr$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Dim-US Co.) wrote:

>         WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
> We have several EXCEPTIONAL PRODUCTS, and we are constantly
> adding more products to our range. Some of our HOTTEST Products
> are:
>       -Answering Machine

I bought one of those three years ago.  Of course, I didn't realize
what a jewel I had until the tape transport broke a month later.
Funny, the outside said AT&T, but the inside said China.

Quality or no, its becoming very difficult to find non-Chinese
products in many stores.  I think the Chinese economy is going to
bury us.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Curt Phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 22:30:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4iq0hd$[e-mail]>
References: <4idpfr$[e-mail]> <4ij6du$[e-mail]>

In article <4ij6du$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (WB3U) wrote:
>   [e-mail] (Dim-US Co.) wrote:
[snip]
>what a jewel I had until the tape transport broke a month later.
>Funny, the outside said AT&T, but the inside said China.

>Quality or no, its becoming very difficult to find non-Chinese
>products in many stores.  I think the Chinese economy is going to
>bury us.

  Imagine if they go democratic/free enterprise.
Japan times 1.2 or so BILLION people.  But they WILL be a big
market :-).

========= Opinions expressed are solely those of the author ==========
Curt Phillips, CEM KD4YU ex-WB4LHI) |  "Computer users will need a
Chairman, Tar Heel Scanner/SWL Group|  mouse when they grow a
ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh ARS; NRA   |  third arm." -Pres of WordStar
Energy/Recycling BBS 704-547-3114   |                   circa 1983
== [e-mail] == [e-mail] ==


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 09:22:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4ir7dv$[e-mail]>
References: <4idpfr$[e-mail]> <4ij6du$[e-mail]> <4iq0hd$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Curt Phillips) wrote:

>  Imagine if they go democratic/free enterprise.
>Japan times 1.2 or so BILLION people.  But they WILL be a big
>market :-).

The sooner they do, the better for us.  The problem is, you can't have
free trade between a free society and one ruled by totalitarianism.
In the latter, people are forced to exist at a much lower standard of
living than they would rise to of their own accord.  That means they
work under conditions that are unthinkable in the free society.

Once these two types of societies start trading, the free society
either loses all jobs to the Communist state, or must voluntarily
reduces its own standard of living in order to retain the jobs.  In
either event, the end result is the same.

We cannot afford to trade with any country that does not observe the
same individual rights that we require within our own system.  To do
otherwise is economic suicide.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:24 1996
From: David Mclean <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Will alinco 610t RX 800mhz if so how!
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 21:30:08 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello:

        I was wandering if the alinco 610t will rx the 800mhz. Is so what
will I need to hit on the unit to swich bands. I have the mods for the
radio. Thanks for the help!
--
                                                    David Mclean
                                              From The World of Hamradio
                                                   KC5NNV is Clear!

                                                      [Dfw-Hams]
                                              Http://www.dfw.net/~dmclean
_________________________________________________________________________-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (Roy A Griffin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB Gauss Meter
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 16:32:13 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

A freind of mine wants to measure the field produced by power lines at a
house he is thinking about buying. Does anybody have a gauss meter that
could be used for this purpose? How does one check/calibrate such a device?

- Roy Griffin

--


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB Gauss Meter
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 23:45:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4iaba5$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Roy A Griffin) wrote:

>A freind of mine wants to measure the field produced by power lines
>at a house he is thinking about buying. Does anybody have a gauss
>meter that could be used for this purpose? How does one
>check/calibrate such a device?

The one I used to have was about 2.5" in diameter and about 3/4"
thick, with a glass lens.  It looked somewhat like an automotive
meter, the type they used to sell to measure engine compression.

Anyway, it was self-contained, completely passive, and extremely
sensitive.  I don't know exactly how they work, but the needle must
have been magnetic, like a compass.  In the one I had, there was no
obvious means of calibration.

Sorry, it's been about 8 years since I had it and I don't remember who
the manufacturer was.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Geoff  Barrett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB Yaesu
Date: 13 Mar 1996 15:22:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6p7j$[e-mail]>

I am looking fora recent vintage Yaesu 2 metre mobile rig - if it haas a
base 13 voly supply all the better.  detaisl to this board although I
shall be away from the 16th to 30 March

Geoff


--


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:27 1996
From: rew5808 <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.cb
Subject: wtb: allied, lafayette, and heathkit catalogs
Date: 13 Mar 1996 23:55:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7na2$[e-mail]>

looking for some hams to help me locate electronics catalogs from the mid
50's to mid 60's.

especially ALLIED ELECTRONICS, LAFAYETTE RADIO ELECTRONICS,  and
heathkit.

as a sidelite, i would also like to acquire a built or unbuilt 100mw
"Knight Kit" CB walkie talkie (from Allied Electronics i think).  It is
from about 1959 or 1960, case is blue, 4-transistor.

any help?????

bobby wb5wur





From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:28 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: FRG-7000/7700.....
Date: 13 Mar 1996 16:58:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4i6ur3$[e-mail]>

.....or similar reasonable price SS digital (or would consider
Yaesu -7 if price right) receiver.  Thanks
Jim Dillon  WL7CMQ   [e-mail]
Always seeking Tuning Eye gear


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Bell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Heathkit HD-8999 Keyboard
Date: 17 Mar 1996 22:00:14 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4ii21e$[e-mail]>

Greetings and TNX for reading this.

I'm looking for a Heathkit CW Keyboard. Do you have one in your closet?
Do you know anyone that no longer is using theirs and wants to sell it?

Pleas Email  [e-mail]

Dennis..N0SAI..Colo.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bob Applegate)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: IC-202
Date: 19 Mar 1996 20:10:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4in4bo$[e-mail]>

I'm looking for an IC-202.  Must be working and have a manual.
Clean condition is a plus.  Send info to [e-mail].

Thanks
Bob


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (W. D. Milner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Kenwood RZ-1 rcvr
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 13:23:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4ijnlj$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]


Wanted to buy: in good condition a Kenwood RZ-1 scanning general
coverage reciever w/manual. Also looking for matching mobile preamp
antenna and underdash mounting kit.

please email with price/condition/shipping

Thanks,

Dean, VE1CBF
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:32 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: newbie wants cheap&easy to use.....
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:42:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4im3hh$[e-mail]>

The man who saved my life in Alaska 2 years ago only has ham equipment
for communications(no phone) I want to be able to talk with him from
only about 30 miles away.I am now disabled and have one good eye and
limitid use of limbs.Assume I know nothing. Can some one help me out
with advise or equipment or both? Training?

Limitid funds.I am good with electronics.      Tahks in advance ,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,D..D
avy



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:33 1996
From: M <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.ham-radio
Subject: WTB: Repeater controller with Autopatch
Date: 17 Mar 1996 14:35:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4ih7vm$[e-mail]>

Need to buy a controller to replace the home brew system that club has.
Please give me a note if you have one for sale.



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:34 1996
From: Darryl Ponder <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Yaesu FT-101ZD Accessories
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 21:03:50 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am looking for any and all accessories for the old Yaessu FT-101ZD radio
including:  AM(PB-2040) or FM(PB-2218) plug-in modules, SP-901P external
speaker/phone patch, FV-901DM external digital VFO, , FTV-901R transverter,
or FL-2100Z amplifier.

If you are intersted in selling or can suggest where I could find these
accessories, please send me an E-mail.  Equipment does not have to
be in working order.

Thanks!

Darryl
KE5SU

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:35 1996
From: Jim Dillon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB:Tuning Eye Gear
Date: 12 Mar 1996 16:33:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4i490b$[e-mail]>

Hello All-
I am looking for receiver like National NC-100X (has green eye,
0-500 PW dial instead of dial scale), Hallicrafters Super Skyriders
SX-9/10/11, RCA ACR-111. Also Gonset Communicators w/eye and CD
yellow.  Jim Dillon WL7CMQ [e-mail] [phone]


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steven Greene)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu 530 mods
Date: 16 Mar 1996 03:34:45 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4idcsl$[e-mail]>

I would like to know if anyone (or if someone willl do it for me @ cost)
mod
to expand to more freq xmit and rec. Thanks Steve [e-mail]
73



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jay B)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu 530 mods
Date: 16 Mar 1996 12:39:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4ieubl$[e-mail]>
References: <4idcsl$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay B)

i could help you.  costs about $25.00


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl H Nord)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-11R ... anyone use this radio?
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 03:36:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4i7pi3$[e-mail]>
References: <4i55f3$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] wrote:

>Hello all,
>      I was wondering if anyone has used or owned the Yaesu FT-11R HT?
>Because of the great advice I received from other hams from this newsgroup,
>I have decided to get an HT.    Had a few questions:
>Any significant intermod problems?  Batt problems?  Can I use an external
>mike, antenna, etc?

>Thanks for any help!


I love mine. It is probably the 6th or 7th HT I have owned and by far
my favorite.
It is a nice size, covers the entire Aircraft and commercial VHF
bands, and just works well.
It has a lot of functions and you will simplify your life greatly if
you spring for the ADMS-1 computor inerface.
Carl
WA1KPD


>73's...

>- Bill
>  [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jospav)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-11R ... anyone use this radio?
Date: 14 Mar 1996 20:50:21 -0800
Message-ID: <4iasud$[e-mail]>
References: <4i9nnu$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jospav)

Unless you really need the aircraft recieve of the ft-11, I would say you
should be looking at the ft-10. It has encode and decode of ctcss and man
other cool options such as a voice recorder that can be set to record
automatically after a page and respond with a prerecorded message etc.
There are just tons more features in the ft-10, some of which can be had
on an ft-11 as options, but that will make the ft-11 cost even more. As it
is now, the ft-10 is about $20-$30 cheaper where I have seen it, and it
has more than the ft-11 for that price. Oh, forgot the ft-10 is also the
first amateur HT to have a mil spec rating.

Just my 3 cents worth

Josh


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Drew Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-530 FS
Date: 13 Mar 96 17:54:02 GMT
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960313115224.5874C-100000@coinc0>

I've got a Yaesu FT-530 for sale for $375. It's a very clean rig, not a
scratch on it. About 1 year old. Still in box.

Drew Wilson
ARS KB0QIA
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chad Robertson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 FS
Date: 17 Mar 1996 22:27:06 -0600
Message-ID: <4iiomq$[e-mail]>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960313115224.5874C-100000@coinc0>

Drew Wilson ([e-mail]) wrote:
> I've got a Yaesu FT-530 for sale for $375. It's a very clean rig, not a
> scratch on it. About 1 year old. Still in box.

Unfortunately for you, the prices on the FT-530 dropped recently to about
$300 new from dealers.  I would advise keeping the radio and enjoying its
many features.
--
| Chad Robertson        |  http://www.mc.edu/   |                          |
|                       |       ~robertso       |  e-mail: [e-mail] |


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kenneth Kalan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 vs FT-51R
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 13:44:38 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4hrvgb$18a$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

I own a 530 and have been very pleased with it.  You should also note that
the 530 may still be on special.  You may find it for around $270 or less
if you shop around (I know AES had them for under $300 and thought I heard
of a place that had them for under $270).  This is noticably cheaper than
the FT-51 and may be the determining factor.

Ken

-------------------------------------------------------- _----
Kenneth Kalan     PP ASEL                    ===_      /  |
Northwestern University               | ___/[__ ] \___/__ |
Prosthetics Research Laboratory       |\__ _|___|_____===/
Rehabilitation Engineering Program      |    \/
[e-mail]       N9YIR                 o     O
Civil Air Patrol, 2LT,1st Lyons Composite Squadron - Red Fox 407
Melrose Park RACES  1M64    Skywarn Weather Spotter
               http://kgkmac.repoc.nwu.edu/
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will
not bite you.  This is the principal difference between a dog
and a man.      -- Mark Twain
--------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bob Applegate)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-736R and transverters
Date: 14 Mar 1996 14:55:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4i9c0s$[e-mail]>

I'm considering purchasing a Yaesu 736R.  One of the goals
is to use it as the IF for UHF/microwave bands not available
directly from Yaesu (902, 2304, etc).  Does anyone know if
there is a low-level 144 MHz output, and if there is a way to
bypass the internal TR relays?  The same questions apply to
the 1296 module.

Thanks,
Bob - WA2ZZX


From [e-mail] Thu Mar 21 13:54:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] ("B W Salt")
Subject: Yaesu FT75 VFO
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 23:42:36 GMT

I have a rock-bound FT75 that really needs the VFO to make it worth
while. If anyone has a VFO to spare I'd like to know about it.
TIA.

Brian Salt.
Buckland Monachorum,
Devon,
England.


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:42 1996
From: Jim Cummings <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 706 INFO NEEDED
Date: 20 Mar 1996 18:08:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4iphjg$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Russ Rinckey) wrote:
>I am looking at a new 706 but have herd that the latter ones are better?
>If so what serial number should i look for.

I don't know...  but I got mine about 6 weeks ago and I am EXTREMELY
happy with my box...

73 and live better digitally
Jim





From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:43 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 23:58:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4ii951$[e-mail]>
References: <4igi86$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (timothy charles phillips) wrote:

>hello,I need mods to trans. in the 151 mhz. range for work.It would
>prevent me from adding another radio and ant. to my truck.

>                                  thanks Tim,KF4FCO

This is a GREAT way to get one of those famous PINK tickets, and lose
a bunch of $$$ in the process.  Amateur rigs are not, repeat NOT, type
accepted for use outside the ham bands.  Use such as you propose is
illegal...
Wayne Hoffman
ARS WB6WLR (Grid DM13at)
Internet [e-mail]
PacBell [phone]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Adding PL tones to old rig?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 18:23:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4is6r7$[e-mail]>
References: <4iksh8$[e-mail]>

RE: Adding PL tones to an older rig:

I suggest you purchase a CTCSS encode board manufactured by
Communications Specialists.  I am using a Comm-Spec SS-32P
board in my ancient Kenwood TR-7600, and I have used this
same board in other rigs in the past.  The board is really
tiny (0.9" x 1.4" x 0.4") and runs on anything from 6 vdc
to 25 vdc.  It has a four-place DIP switch used to select
from one of 32 standard EIA tones.  You can mount it inside
your rig with a double-faced sticky foam pad.  The only
drawbacks are (a) you can only have one tone available at a
time, and (b) you have to open the rig up to change tones.
AES sells this module for $28.95 plus shipping.

I don't know whether this will meet your needs or not, but
it's cheap, it works, and I can personally recommend it.

Another (much more expensive) alternative is to purchase
Comm-Spec's TE-64, which is an external multi-purpose tone
generator that is in its own enclosure and mounts external
to the rig.  It is big (5.25" x 3.3" x 1.7") and must run
on 12 vdc.  It has a front-panel knob to select the tone.
The cost of this unit is $79.95 plus shipping.

Good luck and 73 de KC5NG...



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Aust)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Date: 20 Mar 96 23:46:30 GMT
Message-ID: <9603202346.AA27222@noldor>

Take a look at the Yaesu FT-900, Its sounds great on AM,
compared to my other rigs. Rig now, every one chasing after the IC-706,
but for a good DX and SWL Rig the FT-900 can't be beat for the money,
and performance. I seen a few almost new, super clean ones go for $900
to $1000 with the tuner built in.
 A lot of the bigger HF rigs right now don't seem to moving that fast
since 80% of HF rig sales in stores have been the IC-706. You can
take advantage and get a real nice rig, at a great price, for the FT-900.
I have a IC-706 and a FT-900 and won't let go of my FT-900. But a few
hams have been trading in the FT-900 for the smaller IC-706.
 The passband tuning, filterig, AM detector, Noise Blanker, Imd rejection
are much superior in the FT-900. Sounds like one of my old Hallicrafter
SX-122's receivers on AM.
73
Mike




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tim Cook)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 23:04:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4isngs$[e-mail]>
References: <4ik522$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Chris Dorn) wrote:

>Hi,
>  I am a relatively new Ham, and I still spend much of my time SWL as
>well as Hamming. I am wondering from the broad array of rigs that offer
>general coverage, if there are rigs that really pay attention to the
>needs of the avid SWL. I am thinking particularly in the areas of
>selection of AM bandwidth filters, and RX audio quality. If one had to
>choose one rig to meet the needs of the SWL and Ham what would it be?
>Interested in your opinions.
>Thanks very much,
>Chris VE6RDC

The Ten Tec Paragon ahs one of the best AM filters in the current
amateur transceivers, and its standard equipment. I think the specs
are 6khz at 3db and 11 khz at 60 db



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Larry Keith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: BOATANCHOR NEWSGROUP?
Date: 19 Mar 1996 17:26:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4imqot$[e-mail]>
References: <4ihtjg$[e-mail]>

BOBBIJ EC ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Is there a place on the net where boatanchors are offered for sale or
: wanted to buy?
: Thanx,

: Bill

--
Kinda...  The Boatanchors e-mail reflector is available by
subscription.  To subscribe, send e-mail to [e-mail]
and in the body of the message, put: subscribe boatanchors your name.


73,

Larry, KQ4BY


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:49 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: BOATANCHOR NEWSGROUP?
Date: 20 Mar 1996 14:56:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4ip6am$[e-mail]>
References: <4ihtjg$[e-mail]> <4imnat$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Bill Sorsby) writes:
>There is the Boat Anchors e-mail list.  It is subscription only at a cost of
>$12 per year.  Newcomers can get a free trial subscription for three weeks.

I realize $12 isn't very much money, but this is the first I have heard
of a hobby/non-commercial mailing list requiring a paid subscription.  Is
this new or have I just missed this evolution?
--
Dick Flanagan, W6OLD - ([e-mail]) - Minden, NV


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael Van Meter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Cable info for MFJ/KW-HT interconnect.
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 17:53:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4iupi7$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I need info on how to construct a cable to interconnect a Kenwood
TR-2600A HT to an MFJ-1270B TNC. If you can Help me, Email me at
[e-mail]
        Live Life Lovingly!
        Michael Van Meter



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:50 1996
From: "William M. Bickley KF2ON" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Central NJ Hamfest - Sunday 3/24/96
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:22:48 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

HAMFEST! - New Jersey (Trenton) - Delaware Valley Radio Association.  Sunday,
March 24th - rain or shine.  Vendor setup 6:30am; public 7:30am to 2:00pm.
Trenton State College Student Recreation Center - Route 31 approx. 1 mile
south of I-95/Route 31 exit.  Admission $5.00; Tailgaters $10.00 (includes
space and admission);  Inside Vendors $20.00 (includes space and admission).
 Free parking; refreshments; handicapped accessible.  Talk-in 146.67 and
442.650.  For info, call DVRA hotline at [phone].


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:51 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Dealer E-Mail & WebPages
Date: 22 Mar 1996 18:46:30 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4iusi7$[e-mail]>

For those looking for and wanting E-Mail addresses of dealers
and manufacturers as well as links to dealer webpages, check
the definitive listings at:

DealerEmail   http://www.pinsight.com/~cestro/pcdemail.html
DealerLinks   http://www.pinsight.com/~cestro/pcdlinks.html

... a combined total of over 350 and growing, continually
updated.  A feature of the K6PBT Dealer Directory found on
many PacketCluster(tm) nodes as SH/DEALER.

73, Chuck
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rval58)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Dust in the FT-1000
Date: 21 Mar 1996 03:47:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4ir52o$[e-mail]>
References: <4ibsmf$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rval58)

chip doesn't return calls.  So much for him,  hmmppphh!


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (William Nowik)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: F.S. Motorola  Mt-1000 (uhf)
Date: 23 Mar 1996 19:14:12 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4j1ii4$[e-mail]>



      F.S.    Motorola MT-1000 UHF.  99ch; 8watt; panic; digital; stubby;


                Excellent cond.  w/batt and clip. $475 + ship (if not
local)

                Private sale.  Please E-MAIL @:

                                      [e-mail]





From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Alan Nickerson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FOR SALE: Yeasu FT-736R W/ext. speaker & desk mic.
Date: 22 Mar 1996 14:36:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4iudt9$[e-mail]>

I have a Yeasu FT-736R With the Desk mic. and the matching external speaker.

Tone encode/decode module.
2M & 440.

In great condition with original boxes, & manuals.

Asking $1500.00
Will ship UPS in the US.

Please respone via E-Mail only.

Thanks
--
Alan Nickerson
N1KBT
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Karl Beckman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Frequency Fight
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:59:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CSLE87-2103961359210001@145.39.1.10>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Douglas R Davis) wrote:

> Could someone tell me who currently owns the following frequency in Sandusky

> Ohio: 464.550
>
> Thanks,
> Doug

Nobody does, Doug.  Per the FCC Rules (47CFR Part 90), the frequencies
464.500 and 464.550 are ITINERANT frequencies (and power output is limited
to 35 watts) except within 35 miles of Detroit, MI.  The FCC defines
itinerant as" operation of a radio station at unspecified locations for
varying periods of time."  In plain FCC field enforcement terms, this
means that it cannot operate from the same location for more than 12
months.  Many, many stations hold licenses on one or both of those
channels for "Nationwide" or "State of..." (Ohio) operation.
--
Karl Beckman, P.E.                <      If our English language is so   >
Motorola Pvt Data Systems         <   precise, why do you drive on the   >
Schaumburg, IL  /  Parma, OH      <   parkway and park on the driveway?  >
[phone] / [phone]
**  Opinions expressed here do not represent the views of Motorola Inc. **
--
By sending unsolicited commercially-oriented e-mail to this address, the
sender agrees to pay a $100 fee to Motorola Inc for proofreading services.
--
Amateur radio WA8NVW                        NavyMARS NNN0VBH @ NOGBN.NOASI


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:56 1996
From: alt.radio <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: FS  MFJ 941D Tuner
Date: 20 Mar 1996 00:13:05 GMT
Message-ID: <4iniih$ba5$[e-mail]>

Sir for misprint.  This is a 941D Versa Tuner 300W.  Jeff/WB3DLG
203-748-4096.


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (David L. Thompson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: fs johnson desk kilowatt
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 04:09:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2hea$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Dennis Snyder) wrote:

>I have for sale a Johnson Desk Kilowatt transmitter.  Serial No. 19
>good operating condition.  Ranger I and II also available. Contact
>[e-mail]

I tried your E-mail address with no luck.  If you still have the desk
kilowatt please E-mail me or phone me (770-448-0588) with price and
your location.  Do not answer if sold!

Dave K4JRB



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Andrew Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Alinco HT 2m
Date: 22 Mar 1996 17:49:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4iup6r$[e-mail]>

Alinco DJ-191 HT
Lots of features, less than 5mos old.
Manual/box

Also: Dry cell pack, 8V GelCell

$300cdn
Andrew



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:29:59 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (dale b. allen)
Subject: Re: FS: HP431C Power Meter and HP478A Thermistor Mount
Keywords: Power Meter, HP431,HP478,Thermistor Mount
References: <4ip2hi$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 14:05:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4irnmk$[e-mail]>

InThe Power Meter and Thermistor mount have been sold. Dale article
<4ip2hi$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (dale b. allen) wrote:
>Xref: newsgate.melpar.esys.com rec.radio.swap:39185
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:11969 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24309
>Newsgroups:
rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
>Path: newsgate.melpar.esys.com!inpc12
>From: [e-mail] (dale b. allen)
>Subject: FS: HP431C Power Meter and HP478A Thermistor Mount
>Keywords: Power Meter, HP431,HP478,Thermistor Mount
>Sender: [e-mail] (Melpar News Administrator)
>Organization: e-systems
>Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:51:46 GMT
>X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3
>Message-ID: <4ip2hi$[e-mail]>
>Status: N
>
>I have an HP431C Power Meter and companion HP478A Thermistor Mount for Sale.
>Both are working units and I'll include the original manual for the 431C.
Will
>sell both for $125 (shipping included in CONUS). Ask Tucker if this is a good

>deal. He wants over $700.
>                                                       Dale
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>+ Dale B. Allen  [phone]  Internet: [e-mail] +
>+ E-Systems, Falls Church Division    FAX: [phone]         +
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Dale B. Allen  [phone]  Internet: [e-mail] +
+ E-Systems, Falls Church Division    FAX: [phone]         +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:00 1996
From: Jay Wicklund <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FS: HP431C Power Meter and HP478A Thermistor Mount
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:18:59 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ip2hi$[e-mail]>


In article <4ip2hi$[e-mail]>,
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:14806 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:28004
>
> I have an HP431C Power Meter and companion HP478A Thermistor Mount
for Sale.
> Both are working units and I'll include the original manual for the
431C. Will
> sell both for $125 (shipping included in CONUS). Ask Tucker if this
is a good
> deal. He wants over $700.
>                                                       Dale
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> + Dale B. Allen  [phone]  Internet: [e-mail] +
> + E-Systems, Falls Church Division    FAX: [phone]         +
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
That's a great deal folks, if the units are working.  I paid more than
that for the HP478A  - and didn't even get the connecting cable.  If I
didn't already have one, I'd snap it up....73 de KI7RH



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:01 1996
From: Micky Corrow <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: KENWOOD RC-10 remote control handset
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 00:48:56 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

For Sale

KENWOOD RC-10 remote control handset - allows
full duplex operation between two KENWOOD
radios. Celular look-alike handset and cradle
perfect for mobile operation. Used 1 year.
Includes manual and all cables. $120.00 OBO
email only to [e-mail]
Check the whole list at:
http://www.sover.net/~opus/classified.html


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:02 1996
From: "E.W. Robitaille" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Tri-band TX
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:39:29 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have for sale a Drake UV3 tri-band transceiver. This unit operates
on 2m-220-440, 10 watts low and 25 hi. The unit is in exceptional
condition and comes with the following accessories:
Matching Drake external speaker
Slide-in mobile mounting bracket
Standard mobile mounting bracket
Comet tri-plexer (new in bag, never used).

   Asking $400.00 for all.      -Eric - N6ITD


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-530's....Why so cheap?
Date: 18 Mar 1996 02:01:27 -0500
Message-ID: <4ij1o7$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)

Hello all:
I've noticed that the prices on the Yaesu FT-530 HT's have rocketed
downward......
Seen them advertised as low as $289.00,  brand new.    A major dealer at a
recent hamfest was selling them as low as $259.00,  brand new.   What
gives.....are they being discontinued?    What is planned for their
replacement?   Heck, at these prices I'm considering buying a couple just
to throw in the drawer as spares.   Thanks.
Cordially:
Rick Crider
KD4FXA
Monroe  NC


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clay Irving)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Date: 20 Mar 1996 08:05:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4iovqs$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (ROLAND STINER
) writes:

>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC

>M>Thanx for the tip. Would you happen to know of an upcoming testing session?
> >I'm currently studying the Gordon West No Code Tech book and will be in nee
d
> >a test site soon to become licenced. Thanx

>No, but you can get the information for a SASE from the ARRL in
>Newington, CT.  They'll be glad to help.

Also try:       Amateur Radio Reference
                http://www.panix.com/clay/ham/

It includes a section on testing and exams in NYC.

--
Clay Irving, N2VKG         :
[e-mail]             : Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it
http://www.panix.com/clay  : to gnaw through the leather straps...


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (William Rahl)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
Date: 21 Mar 1996 00:43:14 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4iq8n2$[e-mail]>
References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]> <4ipeov$[e-mail]>

Thanks Will, Especially about the telephone link, Now that I understand
that theory,that is a expensive deal.
                                                            Thanks Again,

                                                            Bill



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jack Neely)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HELP with Pinoneer radio
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:14:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4is9m1$[e-mail]>

I was in an acident that knock my Pioneer car sterio loose.  It still
worked though.  I took in out and fixed the cage that it was installed
in but when I put the radio back in it didn't work.  I think I'm not
hooking it up right.  Would someone work with me to help me get it
working?

Please reply by e-mail because I'm not following this group:
[e-mail]

Thanks!



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:06 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Selman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help: Amp intermitant Output...Could it be the Tubes?
Date: 22 Mar 1996 13:12:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4iu8ve$[e-mail]>

I have a Dentron Clipperton QRO that has been working excellent for
years.  It puts out 1500 pep but sometimes when I turn it on, it has no
output.  Sometimes it does work.  I've checked connections, etc. but
Transceiver has little output to amp when the amp refuses to have
output.  Have cleaned contacts on relay; could there be some problem with
the tubes?  Can buy new ones... and can get a deal on 572B's if I coudl
buy more then 12 of them... but ... any ideas?

WE6A


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (jerry shepherd)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Amp intermitant Output...Could it be the Tubes?
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 14:22:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4iuctu$[e-mail]>
References: <4iu8ve$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Robert Selman) wrote:

>I have a Dentron Clipperton QRO that has been working excellent for
>years.  It puts out 1500 pep but sometimes when I turn it on, it has no
>output.  Sometimes it does work.  I've checked connections, etc. but
>Transceiver has little output to amp when the amp refuses to have
>output.  Have cleaned contacts on relay; could there be some problem with
>the tubes?  Can buy new ones... and can get a deal on 572B's if I coudl
>buy more then 12 of them... but ... any ideas?

>WE6A
i had about the same problem with my clipperton-l the two black leads
comming form the in and so-239 connector;s was laying across each
other and you couldn't see any thing wrong uitill I turned off the
lights and where they were touching they sometimes would arc and short
the input to the output bypassing the amp the insulation had just the
smallest hole in it where it had burnt and it didn't do it all the
time  hope this helps you ,also listen to make sure the relay is
ingaging each time . 73,s jerry wa4ucf



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help: Amp intermitant Output...Could it be the Tubes?
Date: 22 Mar 1996 10:17:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4iugab$[e-mail]>
References: <4iuctu$[e-mail]>

In article <4iuctu$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(jerry shepherd) writes:

>
>[e-mail] (Robert Selman) wrote:
>
>>I have a Dentron Clipperton QRO that has been working excellent for
>>years.  It puts out 1500 pep but sometimes when I turn it on, it has no
>>output.  Sometimes it does work.  I've checked connections, etc. but
>>Transceiver has little output to amp when the amp refuses to have
>>output.  Have cleaned contacts on relay; could there be some problem
with
>>the tubes?  Can buy new ones... and can get a deal on 572B's if I coudl
>>buy more then 12 of them... but ... any ideas?

Could be about anything. Do you have normal idle plate current with the
amp keyed and no drive? Do the tubes draw plate current when the amp is
NOT keyed? Does the input SWR skyrocket when the amp quits working?

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:09 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: Hey! Who controls IC-706?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4iqfsl$[e-mail]> <4isfof$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 21:57:28 GMT

What about that little gadget advertised in QST for $29.95. I supposingly
plugs right into the radio and goes to the pc's serial port and includes
rig control software. Made by JBI 800-524-8658.



: >Is anyone out there using a computer to control the Icom IC-706?  I
: know
: >the radio has a computer port, and I know there are interface adapters
: out
: >there, but is anyone using them?  Has anyone heard of computer
: programs
: >for this?  Is anyone out there?  Does anyone care?
: >

: There are several programs available for controlling Icom radios.  You
: can find them on shareware CD ROMs (e.g. QRZ),  or at some of the
: popular ftp sites.  Also,  contest logging programs like CT and NA have
: the ability to control Icom radios.  While I haven't hooked a PC up to
: my 706 yet,  I have connected my AEA HamLink controller to the CI-V
: port to use it as a remote base.

: --
: Rob Peebles, WD8LXX
: Dublin, Ohio
:

--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF rig advice needed!!!
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 19:35:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4iuvpb$[e-mail]>
References: <4it6vj$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (David E. Shelton) wrote:

>I have been cleaning my shack and I am progressing from my Icom
>IC-728. I want the HF rig to end the hunt at least for a while, next
>couple years. I operate primarily CW and I do operate some digital,
>packet and G-TOR. I would love to hear the more experienced hams give
>me some advice on the rigs running between $1000-$2200 price range. I
>am not going to mention the direction I have been leaning but I do
>like the Ten Tec Omni VI a lot.

I haven't personally used any of the late model rigs, but there's a
distinct correlation on the air between higher code speeds and the
numbers of operators using Ten Tec.  Maybe you'll draw the same
conclusions from that as I did.

Incidentally, I don't own a Ten Tec, but it's not for lack of
desire.  ;)

Good luck with your purchase.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:12 1996
From: Jeremiah Rogers <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF rig advice needed!!!
Date: 23 Mar 1996 14:57:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4j13gk$9g4$[e-mail]>

Hey Jack, what are you going to do with the old ICOM?  If you're interested in
letting it go, let me know.  I don't know anything about the rig, but I'm
in the market for a solid-state rig, doesn't have to have all the bells and
whistles, that might be fairly low-cost.  If not interested, then that is fine
with me.  Either way, let me know what you hear, and good luck.
73,
Jeremiah (KE4LSU), [e-mail]
--
Jeremiah Rogers, KE4LSU, [e-mail]
"There are always three sides to every story:
the two sides told,
and the side untold."--my father


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dalevanbat)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How do you like your Yaesu FT-3000M?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 07:10:42 -0500
Message-ID: <4irh02$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Dalevanbat)

David,
Just got the 3000M 2 days ago. It takes some getting used to to program
but after 4 cups of coffee it was easy. So far I like it. I'll have more
thoughts on it in a couple weeks. It does have expanded rx. 110-180,
300-520, 800-999 however cell is blocked. ARS is nice. 70 watts high is
claimed, mine is almost 90 on high, 10 low. It has 2 cooling fans on fins
instead of one. From mic you can control DTMF,tuning,menu programming,
backlight,sever user programmable features, power levels, VFO.
Given a couple of weeks to get used to it maybe I'll feel more comfortable
and have a better idea of how well it performs.

Dale   N3WUH


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:15 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT Dual-Band Amp vs. Dual-Band Mobile
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 17:59:03 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1>


In Article<lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1>, <[e-mail]> writes:
> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
> Path: news.halcyon.com!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.
ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2
.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.n
etcom.com!netcom.com!NewsWatcher!user
> From: [e-mail] (Stephen Lui)
> Subject: HT Dual-Band Amp vs. Dual-Band Mobile
> Message-ID: <lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1>
> Sender: [e-mail]
> Organization: Netcom
> X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b4
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 06:51:09 GMT
> Lines: 27
> Xref: news.halcyon.com rec.radio.amateur.equipment:28192 rec.radio.amateur.m
isc:99104
>
> I've enjoyed using my Icom IC-Z1A dual-band HT and have been looking at
> dual-band amplifiers. I seem to need a bit more power when using the HT in
> my car, using a MFJ-1724B magmount antenna. My HT puts out 5W on 2M and 7W
> on 70cm when connected to 13.5V.
>
> I could buy a high gain antenna, but I really don't want a 5 foot antenna
> on my car!
>
> RF Concepts has a 2M/70cm amp (Model 2/70G) which outputs 30W/20W for 5
> watts in for $259 and has a built-in receive preamp as well. How will the
> HT and the amp compare to a dual-band mobile unit?
>
> The power may be comparable, and the amp also improves received signals,
> but how will the performance compare with a dual-band mobile? Does the RF
> Concepts dual-band amp have any band pass filters to reduce intermod?
>
> I do connect my HT to a Radio Shack Discone antenna at home and don't seem
> to have much of a problem with intermod. I know the discone isn't a high
> gain antenna, but it is definitely better than the rubber duckie!
>
> I like all of the features of my HT and I probably have to buy something
> like a Yaesu FT-8500 ($680) to get comparable features (alphanumerics are
> high on my priority list). I like the ICOM IC-2000H ($300), but it is only
> a 2M radio.
>
> Stephen
> KF6BTE

Hi Stephen,

My suggestion is to skip the dual band amp.  You will be better off with a
real dual band mobile radio.  With a mobile radio your radio is always ready
to go in the car (no hooking it up to external antenna and power).  Your hand
held is always ready to be taken in your coat pocket.

A handheld does not have the best immunity in the receiver.  You will
experience more intermod when using the handheld in your car on an external
antenna.

Bill



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:16 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: HT Dual-Band Amp vs. Dual-Band Mobile
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 15:42:54 GMT

In article <lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1> [e-mail] (Stephen Lui) write
s:
>I've enjoyed using my Icom IC-Z1A dual-band HT and have been looking at
>dual-band amplifiers. I seem to need a bit more power when using the HT in
>my car, using a MFJ-1724B magmount antenna. My HT puts out 5W on 2M and 7W
>on 70cm when connected to 13.5V.
>
>I could buy a high gain antenna, but I really don't want a 5 foot antenna
>on my car!
>
>RF Concepts has a 2M/70cm amp (Model 2/70G) which outputs 30W/20W for 5
>watts in for $259 and has a built-in receive preamp as well. How will the
>HT and the amp compare to a dual-band mobile unit?

Not favorably. Think of the tangle of cables, the still poor audio
output, and the almost certainty of overload and intermod problems
with the HT plus preamp.

>The power may be comparable, and the amp also improves received signals,
>but how will the performance compare with a dual-band mobile? Does the RF
>Concepts dual-band amp have any band pass filters to reduce intermod?

No, there are no filters limiting intermod included, and the preamp will
only make it worse. Your HT is already too sensitive thanks to being designed
to work with a rubber dummy load.

>I do connect my HT to a Radio Shack Discone antenna at home and don't seem
>to have much of a problem with intermod. I know the discone isn't a high
>gain antenna, but it is definitely better than the rubber duckie!

Barely. :-)  The main advantage is height, which is certainly not
inconsequential, but doesn't fully make up for the lack of gain.

>I like all of the features of my HT and I probably have to buy something
>like a Yaesu FT-8500 ($680) to get comparable features (alphanumerics are
>high on my priority list). I like the ICOM IC-2000H ($300), but it is only
>a 2M radio.

Ouch. Yes, if bells and whistles are more important than solid
communications capabilities, you're going to have to spend a ton
on a mobile rig. But if you're more interested in good communications
performance, there are alternatives which will work much better than
a HT and an amp, while not costing more than the combination of a
HT and an amp. The Yaesu FT-8500 is actually a pretty good ham rig,
despite the bells and whistles, but a Motorola Mitrek would be better,
and cost less than $100 (or a MIcor for $50, or a GE Mastr II for $75).
With the change, you could also buy a scanner if you just have to have
that capability.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (Duane Whittingham)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX 242
Date: 20 Mar 96 07:01:57 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Sorry on earlier post I meant HTX-242, not 212. What features will the 242
have over HTX 212, and the cost, thanks.

--
>>>> Duane Whittingham - N9SSN - Dedicated to TVRO & Radio Broadcasting!  <<<<

                    [e-mail]  (MHGC -- Damian Smith)

>>>> Tom & Darryl TVRO Show Now on E2/18 5.8 Audio Thursdays at 9pm ET!   <<<<


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:18 1996
From: Stephen Farlow <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-738 Aux Jack #1
Date: 21 Mar 1996 12:22:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4irhmh$[e-mail]>

I have an ICOM 738 and need to wire a connector for the cable between my KAM a
nd the
AUX 1 plug on the back of my IC-738. Kantronics sent me specific wiring instru
ctions
for doing this for the IC-737. Is the pinout/wiring identical for the AUX 1 pl
ug on
both the IC-737 and the IC-738?




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:20 1996
From: Will Flor <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC706 VHF Mars/CAP transmit ??????
Date: 19 Mar 1996 18:31:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4imuhs$[e-mail]>
References: <4id9pl$[e-mail]> <4ime72$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Gary Fiber) wrote:
>[e-mail] (Stephan Rashkin) wrote:
>
>Well it's been over a month or so and the service manuals
>>have been out...Has anyone undone Icom's blunder of
>>excluding VHF/CAP Mars operators????
>
>>Steve, WA2NHZ
>
>I would have a look in the latest Artsci manual. You better be ready
>to do some desoldering.  there is a box with 20 pins that needs to be
>desoldered, two SMD devices removed and under the main board a circuit
>trace to be cut and jumper added.  then when your are through the
>radio still will only offset 4 megahertz so it is impossiable to span
>the two meter band.  if you have a CAP repeater with an input on 143
>Mhz and output on 148 Mhz  you are out of luck,  the 706 will not do
>that split, only will do 4 Mhz tops.
>
>Gary
>

..and that is why the 706 is not very useful for CAP, since the vast majority
of CAP VHF operations use repeaters with 4.25 MHz offsets.  It would work OK
for simplex or digital modes, but that's not enough for me. ;-)

Any radio that is not capable of a 4.25 MHz split (the HTX-212 comes to
mind as another) is IMHO not realistically "MARS/CAP capable" since it
doesn't allow the user to use his radio for what is about 90% of CAP radio.

73 de Will KB9JTT




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:21 1996
From: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom IC-Z1A
Date: 23 Mar 1996 03:23:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4ivqr0$anq$[e-mail]>

Grab one fast. It's been discontinued in Japan and doesn't have a very
rosy future in this country either. Price is down to as low as $319 (includes
$100 rebate). The W31A and new T7A will be ICOM's dualband HTs.


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (Len Revelle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IF 10C for TS-140S;need Info(buy?)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 03:03:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4insi8$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Brian Gilhuly <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>The IF-10C is nothing more than two ICs that go into existing
>sockets inside the radio. The types required are an 8251A and a
>4040 and both should be fairly easy to find. (The 8251A will be
>harder because there isn't much call for 8250 UARTs like it any
>more.)

>Apart from the ICs, you will also need to buy or build an
>external level translator like the Kenwood IF-232C. for more
>info on this, check the Kentrol Web pages.

>73 de Brian

>The IF-10C was a board with two IC's that is attached with four screws and tw
o headers in my 680. I think the 440 used the two IC approach.



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:22 1996
From: Mark Boden <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info on RCA Commercial two-way radios
Date: 20 Mar 1996 22:50:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4iq244$[e-mail]>
References: <4ilf9r$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

I have used RAB parts in Canonsburg PA for manuals and parts.  The number
that I have for them is 412-873-4600



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (Stan Huntting)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: KaWin News
Date: 22 Mar 1996 04:10:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4it986$[e-mail]>

KAWIN NEWS

KaWin 6.36
Kantronics to distribute KaWin
KaWin FTP Site closure
KaWin News mailing list issues

Version 6.36 of KaWin, available now from the KaWin Home Page, is just a
maintenance release with a few, very minor, fixes. But, due to problems
with my mailer, many people missed the announcement of version 6.35,
with support for the Buckmaster Hamcall CDROM.

Also, I am very pleased to announce that Kantronics will be packaging
KaWin on diskette with every TNC and TNC-upgrade. This is the same
shareware KaWin that is available from the KaWin Home Page and will
increase the distribution of KaWin several fold.

All files that were previously available from the KaWin FTP Site have
been consolidated in the KaWin Home Page. If you do not have Web access
and had previously relied on FTP access to these files, send me email to
that effect and we'll arrange to get them to you.

I have purged all addresses from the KaWin News mailing list that have
had delivery problems. If you did NOT receive the email version of KaWin
News announcing KaWin 6.36 and would like to be on the mailing list,
please subscribe by email request. To add your email address to the
KaWin News mailing list, send email to [e-mail] with the word
SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If your email address is modified in any
way by your host or gateway, please include the correct address in the
body of the message. Thanks.

73, Igottago... Stan ..

KaWin News is published by Stan Huntting, KF0IA.
--
Stan Huntting,    KF0IA
Email:            [e-mail]
Fax:              303 444 2314
KaWin home page:  http://www.mutadv.com/kawin/
Postal address:   4655 Pleasant Ridge Rd.,
                  Boulder, CO 80301-1731, USA



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (KD4GEU)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM-733 New Version
Date: 22 Mar 1996 05:04:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4ittut$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KD4GEU)

Can anyone confirm if the new 733's have a built in duplexer, I know they
have the backlit mike?

Thanks!

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:26 1996
From: ns4w <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: KENWOOD TS503
Date: 20 Mar 1996 21:34:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4iptkl$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Whats a "TS503", I have heard of "530", is this different ?



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (M.F.P.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MARS Mod for ICOM 737A
Date: 22 Mar 1996 02:26:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4it35c$[e-mail]>

Anyone willing to let our group know if there is EVEN a mod that exists?

RMRA
Marc KB7YJJ



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tracy Hooker)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: mars/cap mods for FT900
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 13:12:27
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Does anybody have the proper mod to enable mars/cap operation with a Yaesu
FT900 Transciever?  If so, please email them to me.

Thanks,
T



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:28 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Military field/PRC radios wanted
Message-ID: <1996Mar22.091212.17189@wvnvms>
Date: 22 Mar 96 09:12:12 EST

Hello, I am looking to pick up a military field radio
PRC type. Preferably transister like the PRC 77,74,70 or 25
Email and I'll work out a trade or buy if the price is
right. Thanks,
Chris KB2HVU

please email to
[e-mail]
73's




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Karl Beckman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: mod for yaesu ft-40r
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:59:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CSLE87-2103961359310001@145.39.1.10>
References: <4in0c8$7a0$[e-mail]>

In article <4in0c8$7a0$[e-mail]>, yaesu FT40R
<[e-mail]> wrote:

>      I recently purchased a Yaesu FT 40R 440 Mhz Ht.  I've been
> told that there is a mod available to make the radio transmit
> out of band.  I want to use this radio on my company's
> commercial channels.  Does anyone have information about this
> mod?  Thanks.
>
> --
> Peter Abraham
> KA6ZNR
> 103077,[e-mail]

It is a violation of FCC Rules to use a non-type accepted transceiver on
Part 90 frequencies; this prohibition includes modified amateur units.
You are jeopardizing both your own amateur ticket and your employer's
commercial license by doing this.  I would venture a guess that it could
possibly affect your employment status as well!
--
Karl Beckman, P.E.                <      If our English language is so   >
Motorola Pvt Data Systems         <   precise, why do you drive on the   >
Schaumburg, IL  /  Parma, OH      <   parkway and park on the driveway?  >
[phone] / [phone]
**  Opinions expressed here do not represent the views of Motorola Inc. **
--
Amateur radio WA8NVW                        NavyMARS NNN0VBH @ NOGBN.NOASI


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Myers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MOD Wanted: FT-1000MP
Date: 21 Mar 1996 16:47:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4is17b$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
Richard Long Island NY  <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Robert Young wrote:
>> I'm looking for the all band TX/RX mod for the Yaesu
>> FT-1000MP. If anyone can help drop me a note.
>
>Just curious..why would you want to xmit out of band?
>that radio already has full receive coverage.
>Rich..k2koq

I can't speak for Robert Young, but there are several reasons
why people want to modify radios for general coverage transmitting:

1. Emergency preparedness.  Amateurs are allowed to use any means
necessary (i.e., frequency, power, mode, etc.) to gain help when
life of property is in danger.

2. The amateur may wish to participate in MARS and/or CAP on HF.

3. An amateur may want to use an HF radio as part of a VHF/UHF/microwave
transverter lash-up, and wideband transmit may be extremely useful for this;
the bands at VHF, UHF and microwave are larger than any HF band.

4. A person may want to operate on 11m.  This isn't legal, of course.



--
 * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are      *
 * [phone]               | mine and do not necessarily   *
 * [e-mail]      | reflect those of my employer  *


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Conway Yee)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Molex and 100W rigs...
Date: 22 Mar 1996 16:58:31 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

In the TenTec that I own, the 12V power is supplied by a 4 pin Molex
connector.  It seems as if the connector is rated by Molex to be
something like 8-10 amps per circuit.  My TenTec draws upto 18.5 amps.
Doesn't this mean that the connector is being driven past specs?  If
so, are Molex connectors really that conservatively rated or does
TenTec assume only intermittent 18.5amp draw?

73 de Conway Yee, N2JWQ

--
                                  |       73 de Conway Yee, N2JWQ  | DON'T
                                  | EMAIL     : [e-mail] | TREAD
                                  | TELEPHONE :                    |  ON
                                  | FAX       :                    |  ME!


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:35 1996
From: Francis Lyn <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Motorola Mitrek
Date: 20 Mar 1996 17:29:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4ipf90$[e-mail]>
References: <4inje6$[e-mail]>

Send me your snail mail address and I will mail you a copy of the
schematic diagram for the interconnection to the remote head. You need to
provide connections for:

1. Volume control
2. Squelch control
3. Speaker output
4. Microphone connections, including PTT
5. 13.8 Vdc power/ground to power supply.

I assume you're jumpering the frequency selection internally.

73 de Francis VE3TDL



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robin Pickering)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need help to design VHF fm radio
Date: 21 Mar 1996 20:09:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4isd1d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: rpickeri @ loyalistc.on.ca

Here is the design specks:
-freq range: 32.00 to 79.95 Mhz
-chanal spacing @ 50 khz
-at least 8 watts output
-microprocessor controled(so a number of chanels can be swithced to
quickly or changed to at pre programed time)
-preferably using an 'if' higher than the maximum frequency
(could simplify construction)
-The bottom line is  lightness compactness & portability
-The basic Idea is to mimic a military anprc 77 set radio, but to do so
at considerably less weight. a 77set weighs about 30lps and it's
dimentions are about 1/2'by1&1/2'by 1'

It's bulky It's heavy and I'm sick and tired of lugging the dam thing
around

Any Ideas?



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:37 1996
From: "Forrest B. Snyder, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Info on BC-348-R
Date: 20 Mar 1996 22:07:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4ipvj8$[e-mail]>

I recently acquired a command receiver, type BC-348-R without any tech
manuals, prints, or other documentation.  Any idea where I can acquire
said documentation?  Documentation purchase, although distasteful, is an
option.

BTW, this is a real solid receiver that I intend to use as the station
receiver for my nostalgia station. I would be interesting in hearing from
anyone who is using or has used a BC-348 in a similar manner.

Please reply by eMail to [e-mail]

Thanks in advance for your help.

Forrest Snyder
N4UTY



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:38 1996
From: "W. Dennis Zeares" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Opinions Wanted: ft-840 rcvr vs. other rigs
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 15:42:39 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have an FT-840 and I am not happy with the receiver...
I have put QRP rigs and an argonaut next to it and they
all have better receivers in terms of sensitivity...

Has anyone compared the 840 with other rigs... what rigs have
better receivers...???? You opinions would be appreciated.
email to [e-mail] or [e-mail]

thanks, 73, Dennis K3ETS Dallas


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Furlow)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Please identify this Halicrafter.
Date: 21 Mar 1996 01:34:18 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4iqbmq$[e-mail]>
References: <4ijm1r$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Could be an S85 ( no S meter) or a SX99 if it has a large S meter between
the dials-John WA4BMG



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Michael White)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Please identify this Halicrafter.
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:08:27 -0500
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ijm1r$[e-mail]>

Edward Soniat du Fossat Jr wrote:

> What is this radio, how old is it and should I repair or replace.
>
> It is a Halicrafter.
> It has a large half moon dial labeled Tuning (with the h symbol in the middl
e)
> It has a smaller half moon dial labeled Band Spread to the right of Tuning.

> Rating on a scale of 0 is run over by a truck and 10 is new this could
> be a 3, in other words it ain't pretty.

Sounds like a Hallicrafters S-38. If you want to restore it as a classic
radio, fine. In pristine condition, a radio like that might be worth $80 -
$100. But if you want to actaully use it, get a new radio. Any modern
radio, even a very inexpensive one, will outperform it even you restore it
to like-new working condition. You'll spend more in parts and frustration
trying to get a wrecked old H'crafter working than you'll spend on a new
radio. Best of luck.

Mike, N4PDY

--
[e-mail]

My opinions are my own, not my employer's.


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jonty Lawson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Problem with KENWOOD TH-28E
Date: 22 MAR 96 14:44:06 HEC
Message-ID: <4iubq9$[e-mail]>


Can anybody cast any light on a problem I have with a Kenwood TH-28E 2m set.

I bought this to use here in France on 143.9875MHz, the frequency allocated to
sports hang and para gliders. The symptom is that the squelch sometimes opens
up even when set to minimum sensitivity. This occurs on certain specific
frequencies separated by 1MHz (needless to say, 143.9875 is one of them).

What seems to be happening is that the radio is picking up the radiations from
its internal clocks. If you put it inside a metal box the problem increases
rather than goes away, suggesting that it is indeed the source of the emission
.
Another 2m set held close to it also picks up on the same frequency.

The distributer I bought it from has made it clear that I will have to sue him
to get him to take it seriously. Kenwood in Paris have also indicated that the
y
don't give a damn.

Does anyone here have any suggestions? Is it reasonable that a $500 RxTx shoul
d
be unusable on certain frequencies? Is this a known problem with this model or
have I got a defective one.

Anyone got any thoughts?

Thanks,
        Jonty


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Prescott)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Question-6meter Motorola
Date: 21 Mar 1996 16:40:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4is0qp$[e-mail]>

I am interested in using a low-band radius m208 for 6-meter. The highest
freq is 50mhz. Will it retune up to 54 mhz without major modification? I
know about the shift+frequency trick in the programming.



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:42 1996
From: sniper@.one.net (sniper)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RL DRAKE Radio CLub on the Web
Date: 23 Mar 1996 22:39:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4j1uiu$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

The Drake Amateur Radio Club is on the Web at W3.one.net/~sniper
***note w3 not www***. The club members are employees or retired employees
of the R.L.Drake Company of amateur radio fame.
The site is under construction (like all websites) so keep checking periodical
ly..

Bob


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rich Mulvey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS 2M Amp, Experiences?
Date: 22 Mar 1996 13:34:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4iua8e$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-1903961724120001@192.0.2.1> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

>Stephen Lui wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience with the RS 2M amplifier? I want to use it
>> with my Icom IZ-Z1A handheld. How does it compare with the other >$100
>> amps like the Mirage and Daiwa? The RS 2M amp is on sale for $99 until


   I have one, and, while it works well, I'm starting to wish that I had
purchased a class A/B amp so I could use it with something other than
FM...

- Rich




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:44 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Stephen Lui)
Subject: RS 2M Amp, Experiences?
Message-ID: <lui-1903961724120001@192.0.2.1>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 01:23:55 GMT

Does anyone have any experience with the RS 2M amplifier? I want to use it
with my Icom IZ-Z1A handheld. How does it compare with the other >$100
amps like the Mirage and Daiwa? The RS 2M amp is on sale for $99 until
3/30.

Stephen
KF6BTE


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (Edward Soniat du Fossat Jr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Seeking Power mobile antenna raise/lower mounting.
Date: 22 Mar 1996 15:14:18 -0500
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <4iv1mq$[e-mail]>



I am looking for a way to be able to lower my antenna so that I can
garage my car.  I need power because it is very difficult to reach the
mounting with out climbing on the seats.  Since I am forced to ware
a rediculous costume consisting of an expensive wool jacket, silk tie and
coton shirt every day climbing up on the roof is not a good option.
If I could just flip a switch on the dash it would be perfect.

Can anybody recommend one and know where I can find it.  I've
ordered a bunch of catalogs but I haven't seen one yet.

Thank you.
Ed
--
 _|  | _ Edward C. Soniat  KE4TFT  Internet:[e-mail]
 _| -|_  Mass transfer:  1854 Bishop's Green Dr
  |  |   Marietta GA 30062-6079    [phone]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:46 1996
From: Adi Doron <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: south louisiana conection
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 22:24:13 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

hi there , next mounth in mid april I'll trevel cajun country,

 can you help on local repeters and nice hams ?

  best 73's       adi   4z4vg    from ISRAEL


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Thorn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: STOLEN 3/18  RADIO/CAMERA
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 19:46:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4ikeno$[e-mail]>

Hi All, Well the thiefs got me last night. West White Center area in
Seattle, Wa.

STOLEN:
1. Yaesu FT-470 2m/470 Handheld, speaker mike, dc charger, Pherex
battery.
        serial #9l151557

2. Rollei 35 S - 35mm camera - Black - palm sized camera
        serial #2458686

Please pass on to all amateur radio people/groups you know.

Contact Mark for info... TIA.

[e-mail]
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:48 1996
From: Shelby Merrick <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ten-Tec Kits
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 17:27:26 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Does anyone have experience with the ten-tec kits?  I am looking for
some good kits to build, and it seems that ten-tec is one of the better
sources from what I hear.  Any suggestions or comments?
73's
Shelby
KE4AKA


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Negaard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: VHF Motorola Mitrek modifications
Date: 20 Mar 1996 17:59:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4iph2b$[e-mail]>

I recently acquired a 60W VHF Motorola Mitrek radio, a single-channel
version apparently capable of covering from 136-146 MHz.  The channel
elements installed are for 149.1 (both transmit and receive).

It would appear (from indications in the service manual) that all
that's required to make this radio a four-channel model would be more
channel elements, and simple modifications to the cable.  (I'm going
to be home-brewing a control head, so I can make that whatever I need
it to be.)  Am I right about the cable?

What I can't tell from looking at the service manual is what (if any)
other modifications are required to operate on the 2 meter ham band
(I'm aware that I'll need to get channel elements for the frequencies
desired).

My intention is to modify this radio for eventual use at 9600 packet,
and I have what looks like a good modification procedure obtained on
the WWW at 'http://www.gag.com/papers/mitrek.html.'  There're only
two places where it leaves me a bit uncertain.

One is where it says to remove R515.  On the VHF model, there is no
R515.  I would probably just 'drive on,' except that the other place
I'm confused is where it says to short jumper from R501 through hole
to R515 through hole.

My confusion here is two-fold.  First, _which_ through-hole (it looks
like the resistor is mounted in two, one at each end), and second,
since the VHF radio doesn't _have_ an R515, I'm not sure where to run
the other end of the jumper, even if I should manage to guess right
as to which through-hole to jumper _from_.

Also, is there a tuning procedure that can be done without much in the
way of test equipment?  Assuming I obtain appropriate channel elements
and can operate the radio as a four-channel unit, how can I insure
that it performs acceptably?

_Finally_, in the April, 1996 issue of _CQ_VHF_, the 'Digital Data
Link' column, N2IRZ writes that '...even relay-switched radios can be
modified (with a smaller capacitor in the PTT line) to provide
reasonable TXDleay (TXD) times...'  Does that comment apply to the
Mitrek, and if so, what capacitor should be changed, and what value
should it be replaced with?

Thanks in advance for any assistance anyone can render on any part of
this puzzle.
--
San Diego District Youth Leader
David Negaard                                    phone: [phone]
625 Shenandoah Avenue                    mailto:[e-mail]
San Marcos, CA  92069          http://www3.graceland.edu/~jrmj/negaard


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:50 1996
From: Carlos Alexandre Gomes Lopes <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted: 2m HT radio
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 14:04:03 -0300
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>



        I Want to buy a 2 meter HT radio (up to US$220).
        Can be used in good conditions.

        If you have one of this, please contact me,

        Carlos Alexandre Gomes Lopes
        [e-mail]
        [e-mail]

        55-11-802-7060


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB7ASR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Manual for Midland 70-065C
Date: 21 Mar 1996 17:12:02 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4is2l2$[e-mail]>

Wanted, user or service manual for a Midland 50 mhz fm commercial
mobile transceiver, model 70-056C.



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Lundgren)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Date: 21 Mar 1996 02:44:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4iqfph$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4imjob$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Steve Work ([e-mail]) penned:
: Dennis Nuetzel ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : >There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, last time I
: : >checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
: : >transmissions???

: :    If close enough, it will.  I have picked up CB radio transmissions (Als
o
: : AM) on a nearby FM reciever.

: "AM rejection" is a spec which applies to FM radios.  It is worse on
: cheaper ones.

I'm assuming that by worse, you mean is has poorer AM rejection.

: The circuitry used to detect FM signals can respond to changes in the
: amplitude.  Especially when the circuit is cheap, and under conditions
: where it is overloaded.

Actually, when the circuitry is overloaded, it should limit and prevent
AM from getting thru.  Maybe the circuitry is not overloaded enough. ;-)


--
#======P=G=P==k=e=y==a=v=a=i=l=a=b=l=e==u=p=o=n==r=e=q=u=e=s=t======#
|    John Lundgren - Elec Tech - Info Tech Svcs. |    jlundgre@     |
|    Rancho Santiago Community College District  |   deltanet.com   |
|     17th St at Bristol \ Santa Ana, CA 92706   | http://rsc.rancho|
| My opinions are my own, and not my employer's. |    .cc.ca.us     |
|   Most FAQs are available through Thomas Fine's WWW FAQ archive:  |
|http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu:80/hypertext/faq/usenet/FAQ-List.html|
|      "You can flame your brains out -- it won't take long."       |
#===T=u=z=l=a==C=o=m=p=a=n=y=.=.===t=h=r=e=e='=s==L=e==C=r=o=w=d=!==#


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (JA Glasscock)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: What do you need for a 2 meter repeater
Date: 18 Mar 96 04:14:34 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Does any body know what I need for starting a repeater, equipment wise? I
want it to have an autopatch, and CTCSS tones to access it.
____________________________________
| Vance Glasscock                  |
|email @ [e-mail]         |
|with Vance Ham in the subject line|
------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: 21 Mar 1996 14:05:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4is98u$[e-mail]>
References: <4ir7dv$[e-mail]>

In article <4ir7dv$[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:

>We cannot afford to trade with any country that does not observe the
>same individual rights that we require within our own system.  To do
>otherwise is economic suicide.
>
>73,
>Jack  WB3U
>
>

Gosh, who can we trade with then? That rules out most of the world except
Canada and some European countries.

:-(

73, Tom


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (tim stephens)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: will swap r/c helicopter to ts-520s or other hf rig
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 07:52:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2khq$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

will trade a hirobo shuttle remote control helicopter with jr century
VII radio to a hf base of equal value.
tim, kr4mt



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (George Wolfe)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: 100W FM Transmitter for export (or plans)
Date: 21 Mar 1996 21:04:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4isg94$[e-mail]>

email if you have either
--
--***************************************************
George M. Wolfe, Esq. - at Beechwold Law Offices
*****************************************************
Email:  [e-mail]
WWW:    http://www.infinet.com/~wolfelaw
Street: 4443 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43214-2603
Tel:    [phone]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Selman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: 70' or higher 18 Sq. Ft. or greater Tower in Los Angeles
Date: 22 Mar 1996 12:59:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4iu879$[e-mail]>

Want 70' or higher, 18 Sq. Ft. or greater tower in L.A. Area.  Please
phone Bob at 818-222-0777 or e-mail.

WE6A


From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:57 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB: AEA Russian Key
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 19:25:08 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>


In Article<[e-mail]>,
> WTB: The AEA Russian key, as seen in older AEA catalogs.
> Offers to [e-mail]
> 73
> Harry
> N1QVE
>


Hi Harry,

I have one.  Still in the original box.  Make me an offer.

BTW the key has a built in keyer.  It is horrible but it is there.

Bill

reply to [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:58 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Subject: WTB: AEA Russian Key
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 01:10:13 GMT

WTB: The AEA Russian key, as seen in older AEA catalogs.
Offers to [e-mail]
73
Harry
N1QVE



From [e-mail] Sun Mar 24 17:30:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dalevanbat)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-3000M MODS?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 07:07:57 -0500
Message-ID: <4irgqt$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Dalevanbat)

Looking for mods for FT-3000M. Any clues?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:24 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: (none)
Date: 25 Mar 96 19:18:29 GMT
Message-ID: <0003800003316132000004*@MHS>



Would anyone know of mods that can be made to the Kenwood TM401-B?

Thanks,

Bill AF9B
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nick Lansley G1KZI)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: (removed)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 22:10:36 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4imv4v$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Please bear in mind that with most news clients, when you reply or
comment on an article, the original (complete with offensive words) is
included - so anyone doing a search for such stuff for disciplinary
investigative reasons could argue YOU sent offensive stuff too.


    <<< Nick Lansley G1KZI>>>

For legal reasons, any messages in this article that reveal
I may have taken part in any illegal activity (either directly
or indirectly) are hereby disclaimed. I hereby state that I
have taken no part in any such activity.
-----------------------------------------------------
Home:   http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/nicholas_lansley
E-mail: [e-mail]  or  [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ed P.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ****TORNADO SPOTTERS VIDEOS-POSTERS****
Date: 25 Mar 1996 18:14:22 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

TEXAS WEATHER DEVICES HAS AN EXTENSIVE COLLECTION OF
SEVERE WEATHER PRODUCTS, INCLUDING RARE AND
UNUSUAL VIDEOS, BOOKS, POSTERS, PHOTO CD'S AND PRINTS.

WRITE OR CALL FOR A FREE CATALOG!!!  (Note: we are providing this data as
a courtesy to TWD. Catalogs are not not available throught this e-mail
sponsor.)

TWD 817-599-0976 (Leave your name and address for a free catalog).

Or write to:

TWD, Box 309
Cresson, TX 76035

Thank you!


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:27 1996
From: Markus Buehler <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 10m Repeater Switzerland HELP wanted
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 19:47:30 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello thank you for reading this message:
We, a small group of ham operators, will build a 10m repeater.
Both RX and TX are located up at about 2000 meters in the swiss
mountains.
A 10 watt beacon is ready to put up to the tx location. We are only
waiting for warmer weather conditions. It will operate on 29.660 mc.
What we are looking for:
Are there 10 m repeaters at such high locations in the united states
or else where ?
We are interested in what kind of antennas where used.
Also the lightning protection is a big problem.
Which kind of tx and rx constructions are the best for 10m
repeaters.
Any other tips are real welcome.
Thanks a lot.
Marc   HB9CPW


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:28 1996
From: Mike Bragassa <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 40:TS870 help, 41: IC-761 sale
Message-ID: <APC&63'0'32b01303'[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 06:21:48 +0300

I'll learn how it works....soon!  de mike


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gary Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 706 mod needed tran. in 151mhz
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:38:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4je52p$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4jcj6p$li3$[e-mail]>

Robert  H°yvald <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Gary,

>In what way does this mod. make the amateur bands less usable?
>How hard can it be anyway?
No the it really doe snot affect the amateur bands.  You need to
remove a shiled box that also has a board connected inside, there are
20 solder connections here, then you remove 2 SMD devices.  Now you
lift the main board, get the hobby knife and cut a trace, locate a
chip and attach a jumper wire from one pin of the chip to the cut
portion of the trace.  better have a service manual handy for location
of the parts and traces.  All of this for 10 watts and still you can
not do more than 4 MHz offset so the CAP users are left out if their
repeater spans the 2 meter band for inoput and out put. Marine
telephone and Duplex channels are 4.6 Mhz offset so it will not be
much good there either.  I would say for VHF you are better having
something like a 281 or 2000 or some 2 meter only radio that does what
you require easily.

Gary



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:30 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: >>>>HELP - Small VHF Xmitter for Airborne Telemetry<<<<
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 12:26:50 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Can someone help me by pointing me to a schematic or an article of a small VHF
 transmitter? It is
to be used to relay telemetry from a series of high altitude rockets. Followin
g are the (desired)
specs:

Frequency:      2m band or nearby; XTAL controlled;
RF Power:       50-250 mW output;
Supply:         9-12 VDC (battery);
Modulation:     N/A

Complexity (ie. size and weight) should be as low as possible, as should the c
ost - lets face it -
the typical life of these devices will be measured in minutes. I would preffer
 to build the
xmitters myself as integral part of a telemetry package.

I have hundreds of various scanner crystals that fit in this category. They ha
ve fundamental
frequencies around 16MHz, but I don t really know if I can use them for this p
roject.

I would very much appreciate any help in this matter. I can be also reached at

        mailto:[e-mail]

My thanks to all those who reply!

73s

Chris (WR1F)


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:31 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Torsten Fokuhl)
Subject: [Q] `Maritime' Ham VHF/UHF Handy
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Summary: seek VHF/UHF Handy with wide VHF TX range
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:19:56 GMT

CQ CQ

I am looking for a vhf/uhf handy that covers - for the emergency case - the
VHF maritime band, abt 156MHz, with as much HF pwr as possible - the
(monoband) IC-T22 offers 100% HF up to 155MHz, tx up to 174MHz.

Connecting to abt 12 to 16 V DC shouldn't be a problem, automatic charging
would be nice. As I have another rx for wx on board, am rx is not important
to me.

It would be better still if there were such a beast that one could modify
for 9k6 packet, but that's not the most important thing.

Oh, last but not least, price is a matter, too: It doesn't have to be the
latest, smallest, nicest (whatever that is) or has to come with DTMF or
CTCSS (it's for use in Europe).


mni tks es vy 73 de
Torsten
--
Torsten Fokuhl,  Beethovenallee 8, D-22529 Hamburg, (Germany),  EUROPE
[e-mail] // voice: [phone] / fax: [phone]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:32 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (John Becker)
Subject: AEA's Doctor DX Cartridge: Anyway to run on a PC?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:51:43 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have pretty much retired all my C-64 stuff, but I used to really enjoy using

the Doctor DX cartridge. I'm wondering if there is anyway to run this on a PC?

I know there are programs to emulate the C-64 on a PC, but how would you
interface with a C-64 cartridge? Has anyone hacked the code in this cartridge
and converted it to a file that can be run from disk? Better still would be an
out-and-out conversion to code that would run on a PC without an emulator.

John



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:33 1996
From: Judhi Prasetyo <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Again: FT-5200
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 20:31:45 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

I wrote:
> Please help me to fix this problem :
>
> I try to open out-of-band receive for my FT-5200
> by keep pressing "D/MR", "F/W" and "REV" button while
> power switch on. But then my rig locked !
>
> I can't turn this stuff off by pressing power button.
> All front panel buttons also dont work.
> I already try to press RESET button but also don't fix the problem.

Now I find the problem is not because of expanded receive freq.
But maybe something else. The new problem is :

When I connect a speaker (internal or external) then the rig seems 'hang'.
Dial knob still work but no button does including mic up/down button.
The rig works properly if I remove any speaker from the unit. :-(
I also try using earpiece with high impedance coil, but also can't help.

Is this called 'electro-static' problem ?
Anyone has idea for this ? I cannot fix it yet....

Thank you...

-jps


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:34 1996
From: Judhi Prasetyo <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Again: FT-5200
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 07:44:44 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Please help me to fix this problem :

I try to open out-of-band receive for my FT-5200
by keep pressing "D/MR", "F/W" and "REV" button while
power switch on. But then my rig locked !

I can't turn this stuff off by pressing power button.
All front panel buttons also dont work.
I already try to press RESET button but also don't fix the problem.

I need the rig working, so please... please... somebody help me...

Thank you so much...

-jps


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Douglas R Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco DR-150T or Ramsey Kit
Date: 29 Mar 96 03:53:31 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I want to thank everyone for their help & advice. I found an Alinco DR-150T in
 excellent
condition for $175.00. I don't have an antenna yet but I hooked it up to my An
tron99
and it receives fine. I was too chicken to try and transmit with the 10 & 11 m
eter
antenna. ;-)

Again Thanks,

Doug
KC8CGX


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tedd Doda)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DR-150T or Ramsey Kit?
Date: 27 Mar 1996 21:33:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4jcc83$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In message <[e-mail]> - [e-mail] (Ga
r
y Coffman) writes:

:>I've built the Ramsey. It has some problems, some fixable, some inherent,
:>and output power is on the same order as a HT, so it wouldn't be my choice.
:>Ten-Tec has finally released their 2m transceiver kit, and first indications

:>are that it is better.
:>
:>>Would I be better off just to buy the DR-150T alinco 2 Meter Mobile for $47
9.00?
:>>(Amateur Electronic Supply)
:>
:>That's a lot of money for a 2m rig. Surely you can find better deals
:>out there. Look to the used market.
:>
:>Gary
:>--
:>Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems

:>Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp addre
sses
:>534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
:>Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

Ditto. I pick up an Alinco DR-110 used for $200 Canadian (about 150
American). It needed some TLC, but if you're brave enough to build the
ramsey, you can easily do the repairs to "most" 2 meter radios. I've built
the Ramsey ftr-146 (the first generation 2 meter kit), and it was fine as a
packet radio, but that's about it.


bcnu,

Tedd Doda, CET
(Lazer Audio and Electronics/ Baden, Ont. Canada)
packet ve3tjd@va3rwp ******* Running TPK under Warp Connect!
e-mail [e-mail]** Running the IAK in Warp Connect!
[Team OS/2 in Canada]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:38 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Alinco DR-150T or Ramsey Kit?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:01:38 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Douglas
 R Davis) writes:
>My little Alinco DJ-160T would not open the repeater, so I sold it to a more
>knowledgeable Ham. My question: Assuming my kit building skills are up to par
, what
>quality of 2 Meter mobile would I end up with after building the Ramsey kit f
or $149.00
>plus about $22.00 for the enclosure?

I've built the Ramsey. It has some problems, some fixable, some inherent,
and output power is on the same order as a HT, so it wouldn't be my choice.
Ten-Tec has finally released their 2m transceiver kit, and first indications
are that it is better.

>Would I be better off just to buy the DR-150T alinco 2 Meter Mobile for $479.
00?
>(Amateur Electronic Supply)

That's a lot of money for a 2m rig. Surely you can find better deals
out there. Look to the used market.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (D.W.Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DX70 Experience
Date: 29 Mar 1996 22:29:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4jho91$[e-mail]>
References: <4idu72$[e-mail]> <4ig8ae$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4iq1p9$[e-mail]> <4jbl6v$[e-mail]>

-SNIP-
>There's no radio that's for everyone (too bad...) I think anyone
>who is seriously considering a 706 or a dx70t should compare them
>for themselves.  In my tests, done the way I use my radios, in my
>shack, the dx70 won hands down - this won't apply to everyone else,
>though!  The 706 is a fine rig - it's just not for me.
>
>73 de Will KB9JTT
-SNIP-

Well said, Will.  Both of these rigs are fine pieces of gear, but
neither is for everyone.  I own the DX-70T.  I evaluated both, and
applied my own criteria: cost, basic features, performance, size.
I was looking for an HF mobile rig to primarily use on SSB (yeah,
I know, I'm supposed to be Mister CW, but not when I'm mobiling).
I enjoy yakking on 40m and 20m, and have no interest in 6m or 2m.
I must have a rig with detachable front panel due to limited space
in my vehicle, so the Kenwood TS-50S and Ten-Tec Scout (which I
owned at the time and later sold) were not viable contenders.  Both
the DX-70T and IC-706 put out 100 Watts, have the detachable front
panel, are about the same physical size, have LCD displays, and the
same basic features (all mode, general coverage, et cetera).  The
DX-70T was (at the time) over $300 cheaper, and had fewer bells and
whistles.  That is important to me when operaing mobile, because
there's already enough going on in and around a moving car, and too
many radio knobs and buttons to mess with takes too much of my
attention away from driving (which is a very bad thing in Dallas
traffic, believe me).  So, for me, the DX-70T was the better choice.
I won't sit here and tell you that any of the four rigs I've noted
here is or is not the right one for you.  You MUST evaluate all of
them and apply YOUR OWN criteria.  Then buy the right rig for YOU.

73 and good luck in your rig search de KC5NG



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:40 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Amp.
From: [e-mail] (Kris Mcdonald)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 25 Mar 96 01:13:10 PDT

Anybody know of any mail-order places that sell amps. and other radio
equipt?  E-mail me.....thanks...73s


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (crum)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Any info on FT-50?
Date: 28 Mar 1996 10:59:36 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

OK, from Jeff's posting, we may be only 4 days away from the introduction.
(Note the date.)

Here's the info I came across:

              Yaesu company memo
             Date: March 5, 1996
               To: Yaesu USA Amatuer Radio Marketing Division
                   17210 Edwards Road
                   Cerritos, CA
             From: Technical Division Yaesu Musen Company
                   C.P.O. Box 1500
                   Tokyo  Japan
             Subject: Marketing Specs. and Features of the FT-50r


             The following is a highlight of the list of features for the
             FT-50r dual band handheld which should be used in all press
             releases

             Ultra compact unit--approximate size of FT-11R
             MIL-STD 810 rating for extreme durability
             Receive from 110-174, 320-475 mhz, 800-960 mhz
             Transmit (American version) 144-148 mhz, 430-450 mhz,
                  and on the 800 mhz band, 7W high power @9.6 volts
             ALL NEW: Cellular phone capability--unit is compatible
                  with the existing cellular trunking systems and
                  can be programmed by any cellular service provider
                  to function as a cellular phone
             Digital track tuning for excellent intermod rejection in
                  severe operating conditions
             Simultaneous dual band receive in any combination
             Digital voice recorder/voice messaging system with CW ID.
             Paging/Digital code squelch with digital voice capability
             Spectrascan--bar graph display of frequency activity

             Alaphanumeric display with 400 memory channels/30 autodial
                  memories
             Ultra loud audio
             Super-glo lighted display with backlit keybad
             Dual Ultra high speed scan (30 channels/sec) with user
                  defined resume options
             Splash resistant high impact case with non-scratch display
             12 VDC direct input jack
             Program the HT using WINDOWS and the ADMS-1B software
                  package
             Built in 9600 baud packet ready port
             ARTS--Auto range transpond system to visually and audibly
                  alert when another radio with ARTS is out of range
             User friendly menu driven programming
             Cross banding capability with CW id at desired intervals
             Built in clock with alarm and QSO timer
             Full line of accessories



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Anyone have the World Scanner Report?
Date: 28 Mar 1996 08:44:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4jdjhh$[e-mail]>

I was told that in a back issue of The World Scanner Report
there's a mod for the Realistic PRO-2035 for a AUTOTAGGER
feature. I think it's a mod to let you use the AUTO-store
feature correctly. Can anyone tell me about this mod and
how it's done. Please E-mail me at [e-mail]
or post it for all interested. Would also like to know how long
it takes to do this mod.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (crum)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ARRL insurance
Date: 27 Mar 1996 11:53:06 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I'm thinking about ARRL insurance.  Any experience with it (claims)?
I don't have too much stuff -- just a few FM radios for voice and
computer networking.  But, I lost a handheld last year while hiking!
An Alinco DJ-580T!  I'll certainly tether my HT nicely while hiking
from now on, but a friend said that ARRL insurance covers accidently
like that, so I'm interested.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (KJ4UO)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: AV3 Antenna Help
Date: 24 Mar 1996 21:50:51 -0500
Message-ID: <4j51mb$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KJ4UO)

I am trying to rebuild a AV-3, I need the measurements on the
sections between the base and the first trap (10M), the
measurement between the two traps, and the measurement from
the second trap to the tip.

Can anyone help?

Paul
KJ4UO


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <9603202346.AA27222@noldor> <4j3thg$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:59:46 GMT

In article <4j3thg$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dennis Collin) wr
ites:
>[e-mail] (Mike Aust) wrote:
>
>>I have a IC-706 and a FT-900 and won't let go of my FT-900. But a few
>>hams have been trading in the FT-900 for the smaller IC-706.
>
>I agree with all you say ... and for HF mobiling, it's hard to beat
>the easy to read and use interface of the FT-900 ... none of that
>multiple function, multi-menu b.s. like the 706 ... I expect to keep
>my 900 a very long time ...

I guess that's why there's more than one radio manufacturer. I found
the FT-900 panel to be large and busy, but not easier to read or use
than the IC-706 control head. The multifunction multimenu system is
a stroke of ergonomic genius in my opinion. It is very natural and
easy to use after a very brief learning curve. Now if you want to
see a frustrating user interface that wasn't well thought out, look
at the FT-8500. I will concede that the crunchproof HF receiver
performance of the FT-900 is better than the IC-706. I don't think
it is enough better to overcome the other advantages the IC-706 has
however.

Both are very good radios for the purposes for which they were
designed. I wouldn't question anyone's judgement who chose the
FT-900 over the IC-706, but for me the IC-706 won out, and for
some of the same reasons that you found the FT-900 better, IE
I like the user interface better, and I like the smaller control
head. Having 6m and 2m in the box doesn't hurt either. And I
think mobile antenna tuners belong back at the antenna, and not
built into the rig. Most of that is subjective of course.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Collin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best Rig for SWL and Ham?
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 16:35:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4j3thg$[e-mail]>
References: <9603202346.AA27222@noldor>

[e-mail] (Mike Aust) wrote:

>I have a IC-706 and a FT-900 and won't let go of my FT-900. But a few
>hams have been trading in the FT-900 for the smaller IC-706.

I agree with all you say ... and for HF mobiling, it's hard to beat
the easy to read and use interface of the FT-900 ... none of that
multiple function, multi-menu b.s. like the 706 ... I expect to keep
my 900 a very long time ...




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:46 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Lauren Schiff)
Subject: BK battery power
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 22:19:00 GMT

Hello...

I am researching purchasing several Bendix King EPH handhelds
for a search and rescue organization.  It has been reccommended
to me that we skip the NiCads and rechargers in order to
purchase more radios and simply run off of AA batts from a
price club... sounds good so far especially considering the
type of use these radios see (usually training once a week with
sporadic missions).

However, the salesperson I was talking to mentioned that when
you run off of AA batts as opposed to Nicads, you only get 1
Watt (pr 2 Watts) of power outage as opposed to 5W.

Is this true?  If anyone is knowledgable about this subject, it
would be great to hear a confirmation or denial on the
subject.  Please e-mail me at [e-mail] I appreciate
any help.

                Sincerely,

                Lauren Schiff
                KB8WLD

--
Lauren Schiff
[phone]  [e-mail]  http://kelvin.seas.virginia.edu/~las5s
Affiliations:  Blue Ridge Mtn Rescue Group http://www.virginia.edu/~brmrg
               Rodman Scholars Program http://www.virginia.edu/~rodman


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:48 1996
From: Mark Pettigrew <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Cabling question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:09:46 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have just replaced the 30-odd metres of cheapo RG58U connecting my
HF rig to my aerial with UR67, and measurements I made indicate a fair
saving on power loss in the cable.

Two questions spring to mind:

(1) Would there be any benefit in terms of EMC to sheathing the cable run
in copper pipe, suitably earthed? In an ideal case, I know that the inner
surface of the screen in coax is half of a pair with the centre
conductor, and no current should flow on the outside of the coax screen.
However, about 10m of the coax runs underneath one limb of the dipole, so
presumably there is at least a small induced RF in the outside of the
coax screen because of that. So would a copper pipe as an extra 'screen'
(I use the word inadvisedly, I am sure!) do any good, or would coupling
between it and the coax cause more problems than it solves?

(2) I soldered the screens of the UR67 to the PL259 connectors using a
fine gas torch and ordinary electrical solder. I just heated the
connector around the hole until solder flowed into the hole, presumably
contacting the screen of the coax. Does this damage the plastics in the
UR67? (I smelt no smells!) And is the benefit of having a soldered
metal-metal-metal connection rather than a metal-oxide-dirt-oxide-metal
connection greater than any problem caused by heating?

Mark
G0WLR


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:49 1996
From: Bill Kirk <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Can 50W HF destroy a TV?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 21:24:24 GMT
Message-ID: <4ishe8$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4iq0c3$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

The answer is "yes", but let me explain further.  I run 500W, on 20, 15 &
10 to an antenna in the attic, about 20 feet from a TV set.  When I first
did this, I did damage to the front end and to the power supply on this,
and my computer.  I then added capacitors in the power line to detune it,
and have a high pass filter on the front end of the TV and a low pass
filter on the output of my transmitter (an IC-735 into an AL-811 or
FL-2100B).  I now have NO problems, except that the transmitter keys a
remote control on a set about 25 feet from the antenna.

I have also used an antenna on the ceiling, but run only 100W to this,
but with just the low pass filter on the output of my Tx, everything is
OK, but I do worry about RF into my person.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (KT4DI)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Subject: Re: Cheated by MARTIN DURHAM WT1S
Date: 28 Mar 1996 19:13:52 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4jeodg$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Barry,

This is a sad story indeed.  Is there anyone in out here that can contact this
rip-off artist and help Barry get his TNC or money back?  As you can see Barry
is disabled. Here is Martin Durhams address and such:

        WT1S  Martin I. Durham
              404 Spruce Cir.
              Jordan, MN. 55352
              DOB: 14-APR-1964

I hope someone local to this address can help Barry.
--... ...--  -.. .
Paul  KT4DI



>-> From: [e-mail] (Barry Hallett)
>-> Subject: cheated out of tnc
>->
>-> The name is Barry in Dartmouth Nova Scotia, I sent a money order to
>-> MARTIN DURHAM WT1S for $100.00 US funds for a PK 88 tnc. He said he sent
>-> it and it is now 5 months later and no tnc.  I am on a disability
>-> and cant afford this kind of action. If anybody has a very inexpensive
>-> tnc I am still looking for one. I hope this ham that Screwed me out of
>-> money can realy sleep at nite knowing he has done this.
>-> Martin I hope you read this and are happy.
>-> 73 barry
>-> --
>-> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>-> --------- Barry Hallett
>-> VE1MUS
>-> [e-mail]
>-> Lawrencetown, Nova Scotia, Canada
>-> [phone]
>-> _____________________________________________________________________



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:52 1996
From: [e-mail](LARRY PIKE )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Chgo area classes - Novice thru Extra
Date: 23 Mar 1996 13:39:26 GMT
Message-ID: <4j0uue$[e-mail]>
References: <9603211524.AA27785@noldor> <4iv9pv$[e-mail]>



        My idea is simply this -- ham radio classes see a lot of
drop-outs because the classes go on too darn long!  People have better
things to do with their lives than attend 6 to 12 weeks of ham radio
classes.

I am looking for students and sponsors for one-day license workshops.
If you know anyone interested in getting their Novice ticket or
upgrading to Technician, General, Advanced or Extra, please have them
call me. I will teach a one-day theory seminar & workshop for any
license level -- Novice through Extra.

I've taught ham radio to about 300 people during the past 10 years
 from Novice through Extra and always enjoy the excitement in the
faces in front of me.

        What do I need to make this happen?  I am looking for a club that
wants to sponsor the workshops.

The sponsoring club will
    1) provide a suitable room for an all-day seminar and
    2) get students lined up for the classes.

What will the club get in return for their effort?  Classes are a
great source of  new members.  Classes can also be an income producer
if the club wants to charge for them.
Keep the money as a donation to the club or let that money pay for a
one-year club membership for the new ham. My services are free to the
club and the students.


Please call me if....
        * Your club or repeater group is interested in sponsoring a
         workshop
        * You or someone you know is interested in a one-day Upgrade
           workshop
        * You know someone interested in a one-day Novice Workshop


                                                        73 de WD9HCR
                                                        Larry Pike
                                                        [phone]
                                          [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Francois Bonnet)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Choosing a GPS receiver ?
Date: 25 Mar 1996 18:02:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>



        I don't know if it's the right newsgroup to post this
        article, but I need a GPS receiver and I don't know
        whiwh one can I choose.

        What about Garmin GPS 39 and 45 ?


        Best 73,
        Francois - F1ITT

        [e-mail]

-----
Francois Bonnet         F1ITT (@F8KLY.FRHA.FRA.EU)
Lyon / St Etienne
FRANCE



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:54 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (John Blijs)
Subject: Re: Choosing a GPS receiver ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 19:54:33 GMT

Francois Bonnet ([e-mail]) wrote:


:         I don't know if it's the right newsgroup to post this
:         article, but I need a GPS receiver and I don't know
:         whiwh one can I choose.

Trimble Navigation has an excellent book about GPS: how it works, causes of
errors, how to choose a receiver etc etc.

"GPS: A guide to the Next Utility, by Jeff Hurn
 Trimble Navigation LTd. 645 North Mary Avenue, PObox 3642, Sunnyvale, CA
 94088-3642"

Also try the navigation newsgroup for more info. Not sure what the title
of this newsgroup is, sorry.

Joop



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:55 1996
From: Bill Grassa <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Commander 2500 Amp
Date: 26 Mar 1996 01:17:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7git$[e-mail]>
To: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Brand new Commander 2500 amp...2 months old....$2300 plus shipping





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:55 1996
From: Bill Grassa <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Commander 2500 Amp
Date: 26 Mar 1996 01:17:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7gk1$[e-mail]>

Brand new Commander 2500 amp...2 months old....$2300 plus shipping





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:56 1996
From: George Sereikas <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Commander 2500 Amp
Date: 27 Mar 1996 01:44:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4ja6hf$[e-mail]>
References: <4j7gk1$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Hi Bill,
How old is your Commander, does it include qsk and what sort of
shape is it in? Also, where are you located?
Thanks much,
George
KC2MF
Basking Ridge, NJ




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:57 1996
From: Bill Grassa <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Commander 2500 Amplifier
Date: 26 Mar 1996 01:20:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7gp0$[e-mail]>
To: newspost:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Brand new commander 2500 Amp....$2300 plus shipping






From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:58 1996
From: Bill Grassa <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Commander 2500 Amplifier
Date: 26 Mar 1996 01:22:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7gs3$[e-mail]>
To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Brand new commander 2500 Amp....$2300 plus shipping






From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:59 1996
From: cw <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: D104 schematic diagram needed
Date: 24 Mar 1996 02:23:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2bn7$[e-mail]>

I am in need of a D104 microphone schematic diagram.
Thank you.

John




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:20:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (James W Beckett)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Drake 1824 Sat rcvr
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 20:02:32 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

FS

Drake 1824 Sat rcvr
Infra-red and UHF remotes,
manuals and original box
No VC II
$595 + shipping.

Orbitron SX-10
Polar mount
Corotor II+  C and ku
20 degree C LNB
.7 ku LNB
$395
pickup only


Jim
KD2KU
Corning, NY

email [e-mail]









From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Subject: Re: FCC-Out of Control??? Please Read
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 96 19:22:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6s4f$[e-mail]>
References: <9603161949.AA21570@imlad> <4ij7at$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

  [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:

>Jack, the privilege they are granting you is a promise that they
>won't storm your house and shoot you if you get their license and
>abide by their rules. It really has nothing to do with who does
>or does not have an ownership claim to the spectrum.

Hi Gary,

No, ownership is a *crucial* issue because it's the only basis by
which government can morally justify such actions.  When a person or
organization owns property, it has the right to grant another person
the privelage of using it and the right to remove trespassers and
other violators by force.  However, the government doesn't own the
electromagnetic spectrum and that's what denies the legitimacy of the
F.C.C.'s claim to its physical regulation and control.  Regardless of
laws passed by Congress or the number of guns they bring to bear in
order to enforce them, F.C.C. control (and particularly sales) of
spectrum will still be wrong.

The evidence of this is found in part in the difficulty the government
has in differentiating its control of frequencies from accusations
that it is abusing the right to free speech.  If the F.C.C. were to
convey legitimate title to spectrum, such confusion woudn't exist.  It
would be all too clear that one's right to free speech doesn't justify
unauthorized use of frequencies any more than it permits one to steal
a printing press.

This all goes back to events that took place right after the invention
of radio (i.e. discovery of spectrum).  At the time, it was reasonable
to expect that government would deed frequencies to U.S. citizens, and
many Congressmen understood the necessity of that approach.  The
transfer could (and should) have taken place in much the same way land
was deeded in the 1800's, or at worst, by holding spectrum in public
trust until an equitable method of distribution could be devised.
However, the military stepped in and through the use of fear tactics
convinced the majority of so-called representatives that its needs
should be held superior to the rights of individual citizens.

Although few realized it at the time (or even now), this was a turning
point in American politics.  For the first time, government had
expropriated an entire natural resource for its own purposes, with no
intent of ever conveying title to individuals who had the right, by
virtue of their citizenship, to own it.  The true depth of this
problem is apparent when it's realized that the F.C.C. is now
"selling" spectrum to private citizens at frequency auctions, but
still refusing to provide title.

>Governments can't grant rights, whether those rights are property
>rights or any other kind of rights. Rights are inherent. Government
>can only infringe rights, either via the exercise of force or threat
>of force.

Don't forget that government can also *protect* rights.  In fact,
that's the only legitimate role of government in a free society.

>That's all government is, the most powerful set of goons in the
>neighborhood. Governments, like any other gang, wield power by
>operating a protection racket, with the protection offered being
>mainly from *them*.

Government needs sufficient power to protect the rights of private
citizens, in order to prevent anarchy.  All other use of government
power (including the involuntary acquisition of that power) is
illegitimate and is aptly described by what you've said.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:02 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: For Sale, HT
Date: 24 Mar 1996 13:53:07 -0800
Message-ID: <4j4g83$[e-mail]>

//// For Sale \\\\
I am upgrading equipment and am trying to sell
some radios.  Prices are negotiable when two
items are bought, and these prices don't include
shipping.

+ Radio Shack HTX-202 Handheld with NiCad Pack and
  also a battery pack for Standard AA batteries.
  Also includes speaker mike and rubber duck antenna
  --$150--

+ Radio Shack Pro-2026 Mobile Scanner.  Has 100 channels
  in 5 banks.  Covers 29-950 MHz (no 220, etc.) and also
  has the cellular phone coverage. (869-894, 824-849)
  Buttons that automatically scan POLICE, FIRE, AIR, WX,
  And MARINE.
  --$120--

+ Astron RS-7A Power Supply.  5 amps continuous, 7 amp
  surge.  Perfect for HT's, Scanners, and CB Radios.
  Provides 13.8 Volts.
  --$30--

+ All items are like new, I pride myself in taking care
  of my equipment.


To order, call Drew Nichols, KE4DGB at 864-188-8818 (SC)
or via Internet, write to [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (louis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ForSale  MILITARY COMM SHELTER UNUSED REAL NICE
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 02:35:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4jcu2u$[e-mail]>

I acquired some military shelters that I had planed a use for, but I did not e
ver see the project through.  I
am selling these shelters and thought you might like to check out a few photos
 of them.  If you click on the thumb
nail you can see the larger picture in 800 x 600 resolution.  The shelters are
 rated to block Rf frequencies
up to, I believe, 1.3GHz and at 120db of attenuation.  These would make Ideal
radio repair rooms.  The construction of
the units are double aluminum clad over a foam core with an outer kevlar skin
( Bullet resistant! ).  In pictures 8 and 9 you
will notice that the shelter can be used with a 40 foot Wil-Burt pneumatic 9 s
ection mast.  I am selling these masts separately
if desired.  If you would like the shelter with out the mast I can reduce the
price some what.  These masts are like the
ones on the news vans, except that these are built to Mil Spec and the origina
l cost to the defense contractor was $20,000 each.
Don't worry that is not my asking price.

I will sell you the mast separately for $2,500
I am asking $5,000 for a shelter with a mast, and I am asking $3,500 for a She
lter with out the mast.
If anyone would like more details, I can be reached at [phone] ask for
Louis or E-mail   [e-mail]

To see photos of these shelters use your web brouser and go to this URL

http://home.ptd.net/~louis/forsale/forsale.html



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (Internet Swap)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Free New Swap Shop Service
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 16:31:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4j1ch9$[e-mail]>

The Amateur Market Place Online Announces
the Launch of Smart SwapNet

Stop hunting through Usenet rec.radio.swap and receive
a targeted list of ads directly to your email box every morning.
Advertisers:  Directly target interested buyers.
Notify the buyers list when your item has been sold
and avoid unnecessary enquiries.
Buyers: Receive notification only when items of interest
to you are available.

The Smart SwapNet is a new free Email service that forwards
your FORSALE, WANTED, and TRADE advertisements to a list of
buyers interested in specific equipment brands.

            Visit the Smart SwapNet at

   http://www.entrepreneurs.net/dale/smart.htm




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Thilo Kootz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FS  Tuner
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 09:37:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4j8dsk$[e-mail]>
References: <4ivguc$425$[e-mail]>

alt.radio <[e-mail]> wrote:

>MFJ 300 Watt 941D Tuner.  Good Cond.  $50.  Jeff
are you prepared to mail it to germany?
i will buy it.
contact me at: [e-mail]
73 thilo



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (louis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS MILITARY COMM SHELTER UNUSED REAL NICE
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 06:26:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2q4b$[e-mail]>

I acquired some military shelters that I had planed a use for, but I did not e
ver see the project through.  I
am selling these shelters and thought you might like to check out a few photos
 of them.  If you click on the thumb
nail you can see the larger picture in 800 x 600 resolution.  The shelters are
 rated to block Rf frequencies
up to, I believe, 1.3GHz and at 120db of attenuation.  These would make Ideal
radio repair rooms.  The construction of
the units are double aluminum clad over a foam core with an outer kevlar skin
( Bullet resistant! ).  In pictures 8 and 9 you
will notice that the shelter can be used with a 40 foot Wil-Burt pneumatic 9 s
ection mast.  I am selling these masts separately
if desired.  If you would like the shelter with out the mast I can reduce the
price some what.  These masts are like the
ones on the news vans, except that these are built to Mil Spec and the origina
l cost to the defense contractor was $20,000 each.
Don't worry that is not my asking price.

I will sell you the mast separately for $2,500
I am asking $5,000 for a shelter with a mast, and I am asking $3,500 for a She
lter with out the mast.
If anyone would like more details, I can be reached at [phone] ask for
Louis or E-mail   [e-mail]

To see photos of these shelters use your web brouser and go to this URL

http://home.ptd.net/~louis/forsale/forsale.html



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (louis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS MILITARY COMM SHELTER UNUSED REAL NICE
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 02:32:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4jcts3$[e-mail]>

I acquired some military shelters that I had planed a use for, but I did not e
ver see the project through.  I
am selling these shelters and thought you might like to check out a few photos
 of them.  If you click on the thumb
nail you can see the larger picture in 800 x 600 resolution.  The shelters are
 rated to block Rf frequencies
up to, I believe, 1.3GHz and at 120db of attenuation.  These would make Ideal
radio repair rooms.  The construction of
the units are double aluminum clad over a foam core with an outer kevlar skin
( Bullet resistant! ).  In pictures 8 and 9 you
will notice that the shelter can be used with a 40 foot Wil-Burt pneumatic 9 s
ection mast.  I am selling these masts separately
if desired.  If you would like the shelter with out the mast I can reduce the
price some what.  These masts are like the
ones on the news vans, except that these are built to Mil Spec and the origina
l cost to the defense contractor was $20,000 each.
Don't worry that is not my asking price.

I will sell you the mast separately for $2,500
I am asking $5,000 for a shelter with a mast, and I am asking $3,500 for a She
lter with out the mast.
If anyone would like more details, I can be reached at [phone] ask for
Louis or E-mail   [e-mail]

To see photos of these shelters use your web brouser and go to this URL

http://home.ptd.net/~louis/forsale/forsale.html



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:09 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: fs TS140S
Date: 27 Mar 1996 21:01:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4jcabg$[e-mail]>

FS TS14OS Mint condition.3 years old purchased as back up .  Essentially not u
sed. Have
orignal carton mic and cables.$600 or best offer.
vic wm3b   Email [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (Victor Jacquette)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: AEA HF Antenna Analyst w/LCD plotting
Date: 25 Mar 1996 12:24:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4j639v$[e-mail]>

FS: AEA SWR-121 HF Antenna Analyst. Graphical display/plot of your
antenna's SWR. Automated or manual modes. Variable freq (1-31MHz) and
width. Audible variable-pitch tone tracks SWR. RS-232 port.
ASking $250/BO

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Heathkit HF station: SB-102, SB-640, SB-600, HP-23
Date: 27 Mar 1996 13:49:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4jbh13$[e-mail]>

FOR SALE:  A classic 1970s Heathkit HF station!

SB-102 HF CW/SSB transceiver
  100% tube type, with pair of 6146s in the PA.  100 W
  PEP output power on 80/40/20/15/10m.  Original Heath
  400 Hz CW filter installed.  No un-documented mods.
SB-640 Remote LMO with interconnecting cable.
SB-600 Speaker with interconnecting cable.
HP-23 Power Supply with interconnecting cable.
Copies of all operating manuals.

Operating condition:
Fresh alignment, all tubes good, no known problems.

Cosmetic condition:
Front panels, lettering, VFO dials, etc, look good.  The
aluminum knob skirts show minor wear.  SB-102 and SB-640
cabinets have been re-painted an attractive light green,
a bit brighter than the original.  SB-600 and HP-23 have
not been repainted and don't need it.  Inside, all four
pieces are in good shape, not all full of crud, lint, and
smoke residue like many old tube-type rigs get.

ASKING price for the package is $300 cash (negotiable).
Buyer pays ACTUAL shipping costs.  E-mail or phone me
if you're seriously interested.  73 and Thanks!

Dean Hemphill, KC5NG
PO Box 328
Lake Dallas, Texas 75065
[phone] -- home
[phone] -- work
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:12 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Icom 12 at
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 07:32:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4jaggl$[e-mail]>

                I have an Icom ic12AT 1.2 Ghz handheld with genuine leather Motorola
case , standard batt. and wall charger.  Rapid charger and other batts
available, extra.  $250 prepaid or cod/mo/cert check.

Please repond via e-mail

73

Ron



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ross Sponholtz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,atl.forsale
Subject: FS: Icom W21AT ham radio
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 13:36:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4j67ai$[e-mail]>

I have an Icom W21AT for sale.  This is a 2M/440 dual band hand held
radio, and I also have a few accessories for sale with it.  If you are
interested in it, send me mail at [e-mail]

Thanks,
Ross Sponholtz
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:14 1996
From: Robert  H°yvald <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Kenwood TM-742a
Date: 26 Mar 1996 19:31:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9gmh$69g$[e-mail]>

For sale:

Kenwood TM-742a with decoder in mint condition. Low low hours of
usage.  Asking $600.00 with shipping
E-mail Bob KB2UWJ  [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steven A. Bailey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Power Supply & VLF Convertor
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 96 13:23:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4j3icg$[e-mail]>

I have the following items for sale:

1.  Astron 20-A linear power supply. 16 Amps continuous.
    13.8 VDC.                         $75

2.  Datong VLF Convertor...converts incoming VLF signals
    to frequencies 28 Mhz or higher...For easy tuning on
    normal communications receivers.  $50


All the above items work perfectly...I believe these are fair
prices, so you pay shipping.

Steve














From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:16 1996
From: doogie <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: TM455A UHF ALL MODE
Date: 29 Mar 1996 01:07:48 GMT
Message-ID: <4jfd54$[e-mail]>

FOR SALE 1-TM-455A UHF 430-440MHZ ALL MODE TXCVR
35 WATTS
PL ENCODER
RPTR OFFSET
HAS DETACHABLE HEAD
TWO VFO KNOBS ONE SMOOTH THE REMOTE HAS INDENTS
PL ENCODER
UNIT IS MINT USED IT ONE MONTH BEFORE I MOVED TO NO MANS LAND IN NE PA
HAVE EVERY BIT OF PACKAGING AND EVEN HAVE THE CABLE FROM MODULAR PLUG
TO 8 PIN
MJ-88 ADAPTER ABSOLUTLY MINT RADIO MANUAL ALSO
OH YEAH IT IS A MOBILE UNIT
MATCHES THE TM-255A
USES ALL ACCES FROM PRESENT KENWOOD LINE
DOUG N2PLR
[e-mail]
1-610-588-4545




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:17 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,co.general,boulder.general
From: [e-mail] (William Kucharski)
Subject: FS: Yaesu FT 411E 2m package (radio + accessories)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 01:05:51 GMT


For Sale:
=========

Yaesu 2m HT package consisting of:

    (1) Yaesu FT-411E 2m HT, mint condition, with manual
    (1) Yaesu CSC-35 (Soft case for 411E + FNB-17 battery)
    (1) Yaesu CSC-37 (Soft case for 411E + FNB-12S battery)
    (2) Yaesu FNB-17 7.2v, 600ma (2.5w output) batteries w/charger
    (1) Yaesu FNB-12S 12v, 600ma (5w output) battery
    (1) Yaesu PA-6 Car DC Adapter/Charger

+ 12v and one 7.2v batteries less than one year old.
+ Never dropped or abused, always kept in one of the two soft cases.

Reason for sale: Upgrading to dual band HT

Asking $300/offer.

                                    William Kucharski
                                    [e-mail]
                                    [phone]
--
| William Kucharski, contractor, Lucent Bell Labs   | Opinions expressed herei
n
| Work Internet:  [e-mail]        | are MINE alone, NOT thos
e
| Fun Internet:  [e-mail]  Ham:  N0OKQ   | of Lucent Technologies.
| President, "Just the Ten of Us" Fan Club          | "Dittos from Denver, CO"



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tony)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Yaesu FT-901DM plus...
Date: 26 Mar 1996 07:51:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4j87m1$[e-mail]>

I have a mint Yeasu FT-901DM with a PK-232MBX and an AEA AT-300 Tuner and
a Bencher BY-2 (chrome) paddles and a sure 444 on a homebrew boom with a Korg
PS-1 foot switch, three dipoles 15-20-40 meter monobanders.
$600.00 for all...pick-up or add shipping
I'm in S.E.PA
73's de n3itn
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tony)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Antennas
Date: 26 Mar 1996 07:53:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4j87p3$[e-mail]>

2 TH6DX 6-element tribanders
1 Butternut HV6V vertical
First $100.00 takes all
Pick-up or add shipping
I'm in S.E.PA
73's de n3itn
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:20 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Lauren Schiff)
Subject: fs:ICOM H-16/MOT MT1000 - Search & Rescue
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 16:47:49 GMT

The Blue Ridge Mountain Rescue Group is in the process of
updating their current stock of hand-held radios.  For this
purpose, we will need to sell the ones we use now.  If you are
interested in any of the below, please e-mail
[e-mail]

9 ICOM H-16 (16 channel, rubbber duckie ant, prog. keypad)
approx 20 NiCad CM7/8 batts
6-unit multicharger
10 slow chargers
approx 10 CM12s (hold AA batts)

5 Motorolla Mt-1000
approx 15 NiCad batts
6 slowchargers
6 unit rapid charger

                Thanks,

                Lauren Schiff
                KB8WLD
--
Lauren Schiff
[phone]  [e-mail]  http://kelvin.seas.virginia.edu/~las5s
Affiliations:  Blue Ridge Mtn Rescue Group http://www.virginia.edu/~brmrg
               Rodman Scholars Program http://www.virginia.edu/~rodman


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jack Kovar  KE0AX)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Motorola Voice recognition phone
Date: 29 Mar 1996 07:55:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4jg514$[e-mail]>

        I would like to sell my Motorola cellular phone system.
        It has Voice recognition for dialing phone numbers from
        handsfree microphone. " CALL HOME" ect. Ultimate in lazyness!
        A talking response from the phone confirms action to
        the phone is doing at the time.
        Three watt mobile or transportable setup.
        Comes with Motorola VCR training tape.
        This phone has no problems and is in excellent condition.
        Printout of passing all test on cell system tester included.
        Best fair offer or trade for Ham Equipment.

                                Thanks,
                                        Jack kovar
                                        [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (GARY BARNES)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:VHF Amps 45 watts
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 07:41:36 MST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have 2 VHF Motorola amplifiers. They are 150-174mhz but can be used in the
144mhz area with little degradation. .3-5watts input,model #
N1274A...approx.45watts out. Asking $75 they are NEW.

Thanks,
Gary


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:23 1996
From: Laurens <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-101Z optional equip. wanted
Date: 26 Mar 1996 00:22:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7dc7$p91$[e-mail]>

I got myself a Yaesu FT-101Z and was wondering:how much do the FM
unit and the Digital frequency display normally go for?

                Laurens

RS171840, UK


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-51R HACKING PROJECT UPDATE
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 28 Mar 96 13:21:45 EST
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Davi
d Martin) writes:
> All:
>
>  In my quest to find out more information on the FT51R radio
> regarding computer interfacing I approached three parties
> the have access to the information, but declined to share it.
> They were Yaesu, RT Systems (makers of Yaesu's software) and
> the makers of EZ Clone. RT told me they signed a Non-disclosure
> with Yaesu and the EZ Clone offered the following excuse
> as shown below from a recent letter I received from them.
[snip]

Why should EZclone, RT, Yaesu or anyone else divulge trade secrets to you?
It's their engineering time, and if they choose to sell their results, they
have every right to.
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Cupples)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-51r Reviews
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 07:38:16 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j4d49$[e-mail]>

In article <4j4d49$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (J. Miner) wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am Interested in the yeasu FT-51r and just wanted to know how other Ham
> liked the rig.
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Jon N2XFZ


I like it. Works well.

Only drawbacks are no direct (plug/jack) DC power input to the radio. I
suggest buying the E-DC-12 DC adapter and the FBA-14 AA battery case
(which regrettably don't work _together_). Covers all the local repeaters
on both bands for me when used at base location with AR270 groundplane at
3 watts. I got the MH-12A2B remote mike, have gotten many good comments on
audio.

The FNB-38 9.6 V battery (600 mAh) lasts a disappointingly small time when
used to transmit, even at reduced power. I read all the stuff about NiCd
batteries, do it all, and then regret buying expensive, heavy battery
packs that give you a tiny amount of power. My preference is to buy bulk
alkaline batteries (they are 2,400 mAh) at Sam's, and throw em away. At
about $1.20 per set, that's at least 40 sets for the price of a NiCd, and
they last many times longer for me.

I like the display and the keypad (backlit) and it is very small and
solid. Has nice battery pack connection scheme inside the radio, spring
loaded gold contact pins look very well made.

It does have a strange limitation in not being able to erase a memory once
programmed, and it will dump all memories if you follow manual
instructinos for enabling then disenabling wide range reception.

Still waffling over whether this rig is better than Kenwood TH79, but no
major regrets.

cheers,

Jerry Cupples
KC5SXA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:27 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Martin)
Subject: Re: FT-51r Reviews
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j4d49$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 18:57:09 GMT

Hi.

Can you explain the meaning of "cannot erase a memory once it
is programmed" that just does not make sense! How do you change
them then?

David

Jerry Cupples ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <4j4d49$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (J. Miner) wrote:

: > Hi
: >
: > I am Interested in the yeasu FT-51r and just wanted to know how other Ham
: > liked the rig.
: >
: > Thanks and 73,
: > Jon N2XFZ


: I like it. Works well.

: Only drawbacks are no direct (plug/jack) DC power input to the radio. I
: suggest buying the E-DC-12 DC adapter and the FBA-14 AA battery case
: (which regrettably don't work _together_). Covers all the local repeaters
: on both bands for me when used at base location with AR270 groundplane at
: 3 watts. I got the MH-12A2B remote mike, have gotten many good comments on
: audio.

: The FNB-38 9.6 V battery (600 mAh) lasts a disappointingly small time when
: used to transmit, even at reduced power. I read all the stuff about NiCd
: batteries, do it all, and then regret buying expensive, heavy battery
: packs that give you a tiny amount of power. My preference is to buy bulk
: alkaline batteries (they are 2,400 mAh) at Sam's, and throw em away. At
: about $1.20 per set, that's at least 40 sets for the price of a NiCd, and
: they last many times longer for me.

: I like the display and the keypad (backlit) and it is very small and
: solid. Has nice battery pack connection scheme inside the radio, spring
: loaded gold contact pins look very well made.

: It does have a strange limitation in not being able to erase a memory once
: programmed, and it will dump all memories if you follow manual
: instructinos for enabling then disenabling wide range reception.

: Still waffling over whether this rig is better than Kenwood TH79, but no
: major regrets.

: cheers,

: Jerry Cupples
: KC5SXA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-51r Reviews
Date: 26 Mar 1996 05:55:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4j80t1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Jerry Cupples) writes:
>[e-mail] (J. Miner) wrote:
>>I am Interested in the yeasu FT-51r and just wanted to know how other Ham
>>liked the rig.
>> Thanks and 73,
>> Jon N2XFZ
>I like it. Works well.
>Only drawbacks are no direct (plug/jack) DC power input to the radio. I
...deletia...
>Still waffling over whether this rig is better than Kenwood TH79, but no
>major regrets.
>cheers,
>Jerry Cupples
>KC5SXA

A suggestion on the FT-51R and battery life. Buy your batteries from after
narket suppliers. I have the 7.2v/1500ma and 4.8v/1500ma packs from W&W.
Either last me two days of listening and occassional low power Tx'ing. These
are better than Yaesu batteries because they are vasstly less expensive and
easily equal in performance.

Also, try turning off many of the bells and whistles. Beep on an active
channel, lamp on an active channel, etc. I found them to be rather a lot
of fluff, and they chew up battery life. I bought my radio in late 12/94
or early 1/95, don't quite recall. Been very pleased and impressed with it.
Now beta testing EZ-CLONE software for programming. Fun radio to play
with.

Don't know anything about the Kenwood, never seen one

You know, a year+ is an awful long time for amateur radio makers to have
the same model HT's as their lead toy. This radio should be discontinued
soon, forcing down the price of existing stocks. Or so the trend seems
to have been the last several years.

Chris - N7RME


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-530's....Why so cheap?
Date: 24 Mar 1996 09:13:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ij1o7$[e-mail]> <4ipqvt$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Jeremy A. Donimirski) wrote:

>RICKCRIDER ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: Hello all:
>: I've noticed that the prices on the Yaesu FT-530 HT's have rocketed
>: downward......
>: Seen them advertised as low as $289.00,  brand new.    A major dealer at a
>: recent hamfest was selling them as low as $259.00,  brand new.   What
>: gives.....are they being discontinued?    What is planned for their
>: replacement?   Heck, at these prices I'm considering buying a couple just
>: to throw in the drawer as spares.   Thanks.
>: Cordially:
>: Rick Crider
>: KD4FXA
>: Monroe  NC


Rick and Jeremy,
The reason that Yaesu is selling the FT-530 so cheap is, (1) They are
discontinuing this model, (2) they are comming out with a new dual
band HT, model FT50R. This new radio will utilize the FT-10/40
accessories.
73's
Bill
N0EVG

>
>The replacement for the FT-530 I thought is the FT-51R.  Yaesu is
>selling both at once, for some reason.  I love my FT-530, but some of
>the programming of unusual things is impossible to remember for me and I
>have to look it up in the manual.  Other things are obvious and
>convenient to program.  I also have two different ICOM handhelds.  They are a
ll
>good products in my opinion, but the $289 price for the FT-530 is really
>spectacular for such a fine radio!!!
>
>Jeremy  WA7YGB
>



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:32 1996
From: nickb@alpine (Nicholas Barbieri)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-530's....Why so cheap?
Date: 28 Mar 1996 22:18:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4jf36o$[e-mail]>
References: <4ij1o7$[e-mail]> <4ipqvt$[e-mail]>

Jeremy A. Donimirski ([e-mail]) wrote:
: RICKCRIDER ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : Hello all:
: : I've noticed that the prices on the Yaesu FT-530 HT's have rocketed
: : downward......
: : Seen them advertised as low as $289.00,  brand new.    A major dealer at a
: : recent hamfest was selling them as low as $259.00,  brand new.   What
: : gives.....are they being discontinued?    What is planned for their
: : replacement?   Heck, at these prices I'm considering buying a couple just
: : to throw in the drawer as spares.   Thanks.
: : Cordially:
: : Rick Crider
: : KD4FXA
: : Monroe  NC

Yes, it is discontinued.  They are getting rid of the stock.  Too bad;
I have a "B" model (an early manufacturing run).

--
Nick Barbieri
Texas Instruments
ASIC Engineering
email: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:33 1996
From: Mel Dixon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-990 Owners/Users ..Need some help
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:50:27 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I left a message yesterday requesting some help on increasing the power
out on the FT-990 and recieved two answers. The gentleman suggesting a
look at the reflected power, thanks, I did and its ok. The other
gentleman, Paul P., I could not get back to you as your e-mail
address seems bad. I tried [e-mail] with no luck.

I am trying to increase the output of the 990 by about 10 to 15 watts.
The factory setting is low by that amount and the Henry 2KD linear is
asking for more grid current. The normal grid current should be between
225 and 250 mA. I am driving to about 185 mA. Thouhgt if there was a
output adjust on the 990 I would turn it up a bit.

Mel. wb5btg.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:34 1996
From: Mel Dixon <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-990 Users.....NEED HELP ON RF-OUT ADJ.
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:48:39 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello, boys and girls. I need to know if any of you have made adjustments
to the RF-Output?? I need to give my linear a little more, 10 to 15 watts
drive. If any of you have found this adjustment please let me know via
E-mail or Phone. Phone: [phone] (Office), 214-484-5461 (Home)
E-mail: [e-mail] (Office), [e-mail] (Home)

Thanks,
Mel Dixon (WB5BTG) Dallas, TX


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Weddle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT51-R Hacking Project
Date: 22 Mar 1996 06:44:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4iti99$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (David Martin) writes:
>All:
> I am planning on figuring out the protocols used
>by the FT51-R radio and the Windows software that
>you can buy for it. I want to roll my own software
>for use on my Amiga and Macintosh computers. The
>maker of the current software from Yaesu does not
>wish to give me the protocol info nor will they
>support my computers. The request asked of Yaesu

Hi:

I also tried to get this info out of RT-Systems and Yaesu, or at
least to get them to offer a non-Windows package for older DOS
machines. Zero success. And I understand that there's some Yaesu
corporate weenie that reads this group and claims the use of non-
Yaesu supplied software would violate the warranty on the radio.
This failed to impress me in the most complete way.

I'm presently beta testing EZCLONE, a non-Yaesu,
non-RT-Systems programming package for the FT-51R. You may wish
to make contact with:

Applied Computing Systems, Inc.
120 Longview Dr.
Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA
505-672-4003 M-F, 8am - 5pm.
505-672-4103
World Wide Web http://www.acsys.com
Email [e-mail]

I'm not connected with the company, just playing with their beta
versions for DOS machines (8088/286/386/486). Very promising so
far, with both a non-Windows menu version and a DOS command line
version in the works. I understand they are/will be offering the
package for other systems, but you'd have to contact them
directly for proper data on that.

Chris (More & Better Toys!) - N7RME


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:36 1996
From: Chris Boone <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT712 mods???
Date: 24 Mar 1996 19:53:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4j4988$[e-mail]>
To: All

I have a FT712 and want to get any and all mods for this rig...is there a
way to open up the rig to 420-430? (above 450 would be nice but not
neccessary)

Leave info here or E mail it to me...

Tnx
Chris
WB5ITT

Entergy Telecom
(opinions, etc expressed by me are NOT those of my employer....they're
too cheap to give me an Internet address anyway!)



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:37 1996
From: Ken Harrison <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Full/Half Duplex Autopatch??
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 23:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960325234317.5325F-100000@zippy>

Has anyone played with the Full/Half Duplex Autopatch advertised by
RF Electronics in Addison, TX for $109.00 ??  It needs a dual band radio
or two radios on different bands in order to operate.  If you have used
it, please provide a review of it's operation and how satisfied with it
you were.

Thanks and 73--
Ken

__________________________________________________________________________
Ken Harrison   ---      [e-mail]      ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (George Deamicis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: fw: DSP-232 query
Date: 24 Mar 1996 13:59:21 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4j3kfp$[e-mail]>
References: <4iv968$[e-mail]>

Dave

I bought the DSP 232 back in DEC 95. Just receive it last saturday. I
made
many inquiries as to when it will arrive. I found the same situation too.

Although I have only had this for a week I can tell you that if I had to
do it again I would never had sold my KAM PLUS. I miss the dual ports and
it
does not seem to be as (sensitive ?) as the KAM PLUS.  Really
disappointed.


           73 GEORGE

            N1JGE




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (Christopher K Greenhalgh)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GE Master II queries
Date: 26 Mar 1996 17:19:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4j98va$[e-mail]>

Hello all.

I got my hands on a GE Master II UHF rig with remote console, interface,
cable, external speaker, and mic...basically complete.

I am wanting to put it on 9600 baud packet, and am trying to gather any
and all information about it. IE; watts, amp draw, pin out of console and
mic, where to get crystals, value, and just ANY other info you may would
be appreciated. A schematic for this rig would probably bring tears to
my eyes.    :)

Thanks much, & take care.

--
Christopher K. Greenhalgh, N8WCT
Computer/Electronic Tech. II at The Ohio State University
E-Mail: [e-mail] ([e-mail])
AX.25 : n8wct@w8cqk.#cmh.oh.usa.noam


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:40 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Myers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GE Master II queries
Date: 28 Mar 1996 16:50:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4jeg0a$[e-mail]>
References: <4j98va$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>,
Gary Coffman <[e-mail]> wrote:
>In article <4j98va$[e-mail]> [e-mail].o
hio-state.edu (Christopher K Greenhalgh) writes:
>>Hello all.
>>
>>I got my hands on a GE Master II UHF rig with remote console, interface,
>>cable, external speaker, and mic...basically complete.
>>
>>I am wanting to put it on 9600 baud packet, and am trying to gather any
>>and all information about it. IE; watts, amp draw, pin out of console and
>>mic, where to get crystals, value, and just ANY other info you may would
>>be appreciated. A schematic for this rig would probably bring tears to
>>my eyes.    :)


[...]

>The second problem is a little harder to fix right. The receiver IF
>filter is too narrow, and there will be considerable phase distortion
>of the eye. I don't know where to get wider drop-in filters. There is
>a kludge that works if you aren't in a high signal area, however. That's
>to just bypass the IF filter with a gimmick capacitor. Better is to
>fit a wider filter, though you are going to have to adapt it, use a
>bit of perf board. Murata makes suitable filters. (Note, if you're
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What IF does the Mastr II use?  The Mastr Exec/Custom MVPs I've
tinkered with use a single 11.2MHz IF - my Murata catalog doesn't
list anything quite like this ;-).

--
 * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are mine and should *
 * [phone]               | not be interpreted or represented as     *
 * [e-mail]      | those of Sun Microsystems, Inc.          *



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:41 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (SARUMAN)
Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4iovqs$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 22:02:58 GMT

>In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (ROLAND
>STINER) writes:

>>To: [e-mail]
>>Subject: Re: Ham Stores in NYC

>>M>Thanx for the tip. Would you happen to know of an upcoming testing
>>session?
>> >I'm currently studying the Gordon West No Code Tech book and will be in
>> >need a test site soon to become licenced. Thanx

>>No, but you can get the information for a SASE from the ARRL in
>>Newington, CT.  They'll be glad to help.

>Also try:      Amateur Radio Reference
>               http://www.panix.com/clay/ham/

>It includes a section on testing and exams in NYC.

>--
>Clay Irving, N2VKG         :
>[e-mail]             : Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it
>http://www.panix.com/clay  : to gnaw through the leather straps...

Thanx for the tip Clay.

<tsb>
                               Midgard Graphics
           3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer
                          Email: [e-mail]

--
          Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime

--

<tsb>

                     A man of many hobby's master of none.




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HELP I.D. WWII USN Radio
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 06:14:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4it5tm$[e-mail]>

I am trying to get any info as to  resale value and positive
Identification of the following unit. Also would appreciate any info
on the former purpose and typical usage of this unid WWII Navy
transceiver that a friend has.
This is all the info I have. Any assistance is appreciated.

Unit is portable, battery driven self-contained, with snap on cover
with assembly directions for field use printed inside. Gives
directions for antenna setup.

radio listed as:   Part #43005 Transmitter/receiver unit
                            possibly Westinghouse.

face appearance:  amp gauge/ USN type CAY-2213-A
                              MA volts gauge/ USN type CAY-22291-A
                              1- 8 pin rec. socket
                               1-4 pin transmit socket
                              inputs for both cw key and mic.

I would like to know what this unit might be worth, and also where I
might get it assesed/repaired to workable condition.
I appreciate any help anyone can offer.
Reply via Email preferred.
Thanks. DR



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HELP I.D. WWII USN Radio
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:55:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4ja74u$[e-mail]>
References: <4it5tm$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Dennis) wrote:

>I am trying to get any info as to  resale value and positive
>Identification of the following unit. Also would appreciate any info
>on the former purpose and typical usage of this unid WWII Navy
>transceiver that a friend has.
>This is all the info I have. Any assistance is appreciated.

>Unit is portable, battery driven self-contained, with snap on cover
>with assembly directions for field use printed inside. Gives
>directions for antenna setup.

>radio listed as:   Part #43005 Transmitter/receiver unit
>                            possibly Westinghouse.

>face appearance:  amp gauge/ USN type CAY-2213-A
>                              MA volts gauge/ USN type CAY-22291-A
>                              1- 8 pin rec. socket
>                               1-4 pin transmit socket
>                              inputs for both cw key and mic.

>I would like to know what this unit might be worth, and also where I
>might get it assesed/repaired to workable condition.
>I appreciate any help anyone can offer.
>Reply via Email preferred.
>Thanks. DR

test post reply



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]> <4ipeov$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4j493t$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:41:42 GMT

In article <4j493t$[e-mail]> Chris Boone <cboone@earthlink
.net> writes:
>>
>>It is possible to combine audio SNR voting with squelched remote
>>receivers and COR operated links. Then the SNR measurement will
>>be on the channel noise of the link receiver when the remote
>>receiver is squelched (and the link transmitter off), and thus
>>will not be voted to the repeater transmitter. The link receivers
>>are, of course, operated unsquelched.
>>
>AHh excuse me Gary but a TRUE Voter doesnt require UNSQUELCH link rcvrs
>nor do the link have to operate all the time!
>
>The remote rcvrs (which are linked back either via phone line or 222.15
>or higher RF links) can operate either COR or PL. They can either send a
>tone down a phone line (typically 1950 Hz in voter systems) or
>nothing...and let the voter detect activity either via VOX, loss of tone,
>COR detect off the link rcvr, etc.....and then it votes..

Yes, you're right, you can qualify voting with link COR or VOX,
but I think it has a drawback, the unsquelch time or VOX delay,
which limits the voter's ability to respond quickly to picket
fencing. Now I know that most systems don't like to switch that
fast, but I like it.

>NOONE uses the tone over voice mode anymore...SNR voters have gotten to
>the point in price where it isnt worth bothering with anything less
>anymore...

Well, I'll take mild exception to that too. As I pointed out in the
original article, there are problems with audio SNR voting, such as
an operator driving with the windows down, that can confuse the voter.
It may be a minor point for some, but I still think limiter current
in the remote receiver is the better measure of signal quality. And
tone over voice allows nearly instant detection and switching during
picket fencing.

Audio SNR voters have gotten very good, but I think there are still
some advantages to the older tone over voice method.

>Also you made a comment in your article that was slightly incorrect...
>You stated that links operate outside the rptr band in the 440 band and
>therefore cannot be rptrs...this is incorrect....AUX stations can operate
>ANYwhere in the 420-450 band (except 431-433 and 435-438) and SO can
>REPEATERS (check your current copy of Part 97....Repeater subbands
>on 442-450 has been gone for almost 20 years...since the elmination
>of the WR calls and other rptr rules)....a crossband rptr from 2m to 430
>Mhz is perfectly legal...now whether it is any good is another
>question....yes, the remote rcvrs CAN be crossband rptrs....but in most
>cases, it is best to CALL them and operate them as AUX stations....

You're right of course. I was thinking of the repeater bandplan,
not the regulations.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:48 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Repeater Linking!
Date: 26 Mar 1996 04:17:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7r4g$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>


   >From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
   >Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
   >Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
   >Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
   >Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
   >References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]>
   ><4ipeov$[e-mail]> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 18:28:33 GMT
   >Lines: 80
   >In article <4ipeov$[e-mail]> Will Flor <[e-mail]>
   >writes: >[e-mail] (William Rahl) wrote:
   >>>Could someone direct me to a good book on repeater linking. I have
   >>>heard of voters and linking remote receivers via radio or Telephone
   >lines. >>
   >>>I looked in the Handbook,but it really doesn't explain to much. What I
   >>>want
   >>>to know is a Remote receiver just that ,a RX radio or is it a another
   >>>Repeater!
   >>
   >>   I can't recommend a good book, unfortunately, but a remote receive
   >site is >typically another repeater.  Most multi-site 2m repeaters I'm
   >aware of, for >instance, link the remote receive sites to the main
   >site by 440 MHz links, so >the remote receive sites are really
   >cross-band 2m/440 repeaters.  They have >repeater controllers,
   >auto-ID, etc. just like the main repeater; they listen on >the
   >repeater's input frequency and transmit on the link frequency.  The
   >link >receiver at the main site receives the link frequency and
   >provides audio for >the voter, etc.
   >The links aren't technically repeaters. They are stations in auxillary
   >operation, and the links aren't usually in the repeater portion of the
   >70cm band, thus the stations cannot be repeaters by law.
   >The link transmitters may or may not be COR operated by the remote
   >receivers. In some systems, they are active any time the voting system
   >is in operation. The voter has to have information as to which remote
   >receiver has the best signal from the user station currently
   >transmitting. There are several ways to implement this.
   >One method, called tone or voice, sends a tone down the link except
   >when the remote receiver limiter current exceeds some preset value.
   >Then the receiver audio is switched to the link. At the master site,
   >the absence of a tone signals the voter to put that receiver's audio
   >to the main repeater transmitter. This is a first come first serve
   >voter, and isn't particularly good when several remote receivers are
   >all receiving the user signal.
   >Another method, called tone over voice, transmits a varying frequency
   >tone whose frequency corresponds to the remote receiver limiter current
   >(generated with a voltage to frequency converter) at all times, along
   >with the voice output of the remote receiver. This tone is pitched
   >higher than voice, and is filtered out at the master site by the
   >voter. The voter decodes the tone (with a frequency to voltage
   >converter) and votes the receiver with the highest limiter current as
   >the one to feed to the repeater transmitter. This works better than
   >the tone or voice systems.
   >Another system, called an audio SNR voter, just feeds raw remote
   >receiver audio down the link at all times. At the master site,
   >the voter does an audio SNR measurement of each remote receiver
   >and feeds the one with the best SNR to the repeater transmitter.
   >Obviously the remote receivers have to operate unsquelched, and
   >the links are transmitting raw noise most of the time. (If the
   >remote receiver were squelched, the voter would measure it as
   >having the best "quieting" and always vote it to the repeater
   >transmitter, a highly undesirable form of voting.)
   >It is possible to combine audio SNR voting with squelched remote
   >receivers and COR operated links. Then the SNR measurement will
   >be on the channel noise of the link receiver when the remote
   >receiver is squelched (and the link transmitter off), and thus
   >will not be voted to the repeater transmitter. The link receivers
   >are, of course, operated unsquelched.
   >This is probably the most popular system used by amateurs, but it
   >does have some drawbacks. If the user is in a noisy location, say
   >driving in a vehicle with the window down, the noise picked up by
   >his microphone can confuse the voter. And links keying up and down
   >can introduce pops in the link receivers that can confuse the voter.
   >Remote receiver limiter current is a better measure of signal quality,
   >but it requires the link transmitters to be active at all times.
   >Varients of these systems can use phone lines instead of RF links, but
   >that can get expensive because you need a line for every remote
   >receiver.
   >Gary
   >--
   >Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider
   >problems Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with
   >previous uucp addresses 534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!
   >| Email to [e-mail] Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |
   >| .

The two methods that are most often used today use a status tone to
determine which receiver is squelched and when that tone drops, the voting
process begins via a s/n ratio process.  In the case of the Motorola
Spectra-TAC system, the comparator looks at the amount of noise in the band
region just above the voice spectrum.  The voltage generated from that
measurement creates the criteria from which voting occurs.  The GE system
works pretty much the same way.

The Spectra-TAC in particular needs to have full time rf links, microwave
circuit or a telephone line to connect the remote receiver to the
comparator.  The GE system does not.  I have seen several installations
where the remote site was selected by the presense of a carrier from a link
receiver.  In this instance, the remote receiver was really a base station
and the remote transmitter was slaved with the best signal quality from the
remote receiver.  This was NOT a repeater, but was a half duplex base system
with several remote sites, all on the same frequency.

The voting process was handled by, I believe, E and M inputs on the back of
the controller.  I would have to look in the manual to be sure because I
never did it that way.

On the other hand, the Motorola TAC system uses another method for
determining signal quality.  In the newer version of the system, the remote
receiver uses three 6709 squelch chips that are set to 10, 20 and 30 db
quieting respectively.  The encoder card in the receiver is silent when
squelched.  When unsquelched it starts sending the lower tone with 10 db
quieting.  If the signal strength increases to 20 db, both tones are sent
and if the signal is dfq at 30 db quieting or more, the high tone is sent.
This has nothing to do with limiter current, it is really just three squelch
controls which can be a real bitch to set up correctly, but when set, they
generally stay set.

The comparator looks for each tone or the combination of the tones and makes
its voting selection based upon the collection of tones from each receiver
that it is presented with.  The nice thing about this is no status tone is
used.  Therefore, rf links do not have to be up all the time.  This may well
end up being the prefered system for amateur use as it puts the signal
quality measuring process at the receiver and the quality of the link does
not come into play.

This does not, however, forgive the sloppy amateur practice of using
unmatched equipment and different link receivers just because that is what
was laying around or could be dredged up for free.  Such practices cause the
repeater to have a different sound depending upon the receiver selected or
when a transmission is in progress the voter selects a different receiver
and the signal that was about correct in audio level starts blasting because
someone never bothered to set up the levels correctly.

Kevin KA0JQO



the only that stays the same is change. - Melissa Etheredge




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:07:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc3p0$[e-mail]>
References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]> <4ipeov$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Gary,

The ARRL prints another book on   FM~REPEATERS   (NOT the repeater
guide/callbook).   Not expensive, many fine descriptions, pictures,
circuits, construction instructions and tips.  Text is fully explained.
I suspect it will have all of your answers.  Paperback.

Tony
WA6IGJ




[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:

>In article <4ipeov$[e-mail]> Will Flor <[e-mail]> writes:
>>[e-mail] (William Rahl) wrote:
>>>Could someone direct me to a good book on repeater linking. I have
>>>heard of voters and linking remote receivers via radio or Telephone lines.
>>>
>>>I looked in the Handbook,but it really doesn't explain to much. What I
>>>want
>>>to know is a Remote receiver just that ,a RX radio or is it a another
>>>Repeater!
>>
>>   I can't recommend a good book, unfortunately, but a remote receive site i
s
>>typically another repeater.  Most multi-site 2m repeaters I'm aware of, for
>>instance, link the remote receive sites to the main site by 440 MHz links, s
o
>>the remote receive sites are really cross-band 2m/440 repeaters.  They have
>>repeater controllers, auto-ID, etc. just like the main repeater; they listen
 on
>>the repeater's input frequency and transmit on the link frequency.  The link

>>receiver at the main site receives the link frequency and provides audio for

>>the voter, etc.

>The links aren't technically repeaters. They are stations in auxillary
>operation, and the links aren't usually in the repeater portion of the
>70cm band, thus the stations cannot be repeaters by law.

>The link transmitters may or may not be COR operated by the remote
>receivers. In some systems, they are active any time the voting system
>is in operation. The voter has to have information as to which remote
>receiver has the best signal from the user station currently transmitting.
>There are several ways to implement this.

>One method, called tone or voice, sends a tone down the link except
>when the remote receiver limiter current exceeds some preset value.
>Then the receiver audio is switched to the link. At the master site,
>the absence of a tone signals the voter to put that receiver's audio
>to the main repeater transmitter. This is a first come first serve
>voter, and isn't particularly good when several remote receivers are
>all receiving the user signal.

>Another method, called tone over voice, transmits a varying frequency
>tone whose frequency corresponds to the remote receiver limiter current
>(generated with a voltage to frequency converter) at all times, along
>with the voice output of the remote receiver. This tone is pitched higher
>than voice, and is filtered out at the master site by the voter. The voter
>decodes the tone (with a frequency to voltage converter) and votes the
>receiver with the highest limiter current as the one to feed to the
>repeater transmitter. This works better than the tone or voice systems.

>Another system, called an audio SNR voter, just feeds raw remote
>receiver audio down the link at all times. At the master site,
>the voter does an audio SNR measurement of each remote receiver
>and feeds the one with the best SNR to the repeater transmitter.
>Obviously the remote receivers have to operate unsquelched, and
>the links are transmitting raw noise most of the time. (If the
>remote receiver were squelched, the voter would measure it as
>having the best "quieting" and always vote it to the repeater
>transmitter, a highly undesirable form of voting.)

>It is possible to combine audio SNR voting with squelched remote
>receivers and COR operated links. Then the SNR measurement will
>be on the channel noise of the link receiver when the remote
>receiver is squelched (and the link transmitter off), and thus
>will not be voted to the repeater transmitter. The link receivers
>are, of course, operated unsquelched.

>This is probably the most popular system used by amateurs, but it
>does have some drawbacks. If the user is in a noisy location, say
>driving in a vehicle with the window down, the noise picked up by
>his microphone can confuse the voter. And links keying up and down
>can introduce pops in the link receivers that can confuse the voter.

>Remote receiver limiter current is a better measure of signal quality,
>but it requires the link transmitters to be active at all times. Varients
>of these systems can use phone lines instead of RF links, but that can
>get expensive because you need a line for every remote receiver.

>Gary
>--
>Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
>Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp addres
ses
>534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
>Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:51 1996
From: Chris Boone <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Repeater Linking!
Date: 24 Mar 1996 19:51:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4j493t$[e-mail]>
References: <4ip9bc$[e-mail]> <4ipeov$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

>
>It is possible to combine audio SNR voting with squelched remote
>receivers and COR operated links. Then the SNR measurement will
>be on the channel noise of the link receiver when the remote
>receiver is squelched (and the link transmitter off), and thus
>will not be voted to the repeater transmitter. The link receivers
>are, of course, operated unsquelched.
>
AHh excuse me Gary but a TRUE Voter doesnt require UNSQUELCH link rcvrs
nor do the link have to operate all the time!

The remote rcvrs (which are linked back either via phone line or 222.15
or higher RF links) can operate either COR or PL. They can either send a
tone down a phone line (typically 1950 Hz in voter systems) or
nothing...and let the voter detect activity either via VOX, loss of tone,
COR detect off the link rcvr, etc.....and then it votes..

I use a 4 channel voter on a commercial system I maintain...and it uses
the methods I describe above...And two of the rcvrs are fed in via a
6Ghz microwave system....
NOONE uses the tone over voice mode anymore...SNR voters have gotten to
the point in price where it isnt worth bothering with anything less
anymore...

Also you made a comment in your article that was slightly incorrect...
You stated that links operate outside the rptr band in the 440 band and
therefore cannot be rptrs...this is incorrect....AUX stations can operate
ANYwhere in the 420-450 band (except 431-433 and 435-438) and SO can
REPEATERS (check your current copy of Part 97....Repeater subbands
on 442-450 has been gone for almost 20 years...since the elmination
of the WR calls and other rptr rules)....a crossband rptr from 2m to 430
Mhz is perfectly legal...now whether it is any good is another
question....yes, the remote rcvrs CAN be crossband rptrs....but in most
cases, it is best to CALL them and operate them as AUX stations....

73
Chris
WB5ITT

EX WR5AOK



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Iman Adriaan Filius)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help with repair my TS-5010 from Uniden (HR2600/HR2510)
Date: 21 Mar 1996 21:15:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4isgtv$[e-mail]>

Who can help me with my Uniden Emperor TS-5010 (like the HR2510/HR2600)

THE problem is, i have no schematic of it, so it is very hard to find the
next problem:

* When I switch it on, the display is blinking, the whole thing is locked,
this is because it things someone want to transmit 'at boottime'. But there
isn't, there is nothing connected to it.

* It doesn't matter if i pul the PA switch.

* Pin 3 (Ptt) is only 0.17 Volt's while it should be 5V.

* I noticed pin 3 (PTT) is connected (via a resistor) to the controller
(HD4074008S) pin 60. And that is the one it keeps the line down. I don't
know if it in an input or an output, but if it was an input the controller
chip is broken. But i don't know it, So we go on.

* Q139 measures BCE(C1815) 0V 0.17V 0V (the transistor is ok)

* The Emitter of Q139 is connected the Key input and to Q138 (via a diode
and a resistor which measures 0V 0V 0V. The key input in not connected to
the ground (i measure 14.5 K ohm). It look now i'm close to the solution,
and it looks like pin 60 of the controller chip is an output (protection for
transmittion)

* I measured the voltages on the 78XX chips and they are OK.

* Now i'm stuck, Who kan help me?

Thanks for youre time


And hopefully i can finaly repair it :)


Arjan Filius, [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Negaard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help!  Swan 500C problems
Date: 27 Mar 1996 16:33:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4jbqke$[e-mail]>

I recently acquired a Swan 500C transceiver.  The price was right and
I'm willing to work on it, but I've discovered a problem that perhaps
someone reading this news group can help me with...

I've been using it as a receiver for a few weeks now, trying to
improve my CW copying skills to the point where I could engage in a
QSO (I'm a Tech +, and copy rather slowly, so far).  I finally thought
I was there, so I carefully read the tuning procedure in the Swan
manual and attempted to follow it to the letter, intending to call CQ.

I ran into a problem right away.  After following the Receiver tuning
procedure, I started the Tranmitter tuning procedure and in the first
step, where one keys the transmitter, then rotates the Carrier Balance
control for minimum cathode current, discovered that I didn't have
_any_ cathode current at all.  Also, there was no power output
indicated on my power meter.

I've checked as best I can with an old analog multimeter, and it would
seem that all the voltages are present.  I've swapped the P.A. drive
tube with the audio frequency output amp tube (they're both 6GK6), and
the transmitter mixer tube with the receiver mixer tube (they're both
12BE6), with no change in symptoms.  I _don't_ have an oscilloscope,
or I'd trace the signal path.

Any assistance would be welcome; I expect that I've got a marginal
tube or two, as well, but once basic functionality is restored, I'll
pursue that issue.

--
San Diego District Youth Leader
David Negaard                                    phone: [phone]
625 Shenandoah Avenue                    mailto:[e-mail]
San Marcos, CA  92069          http://www3.graceland.edu/~jrmj/negaard


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Icecold)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help! What do I need???
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 09:34:50 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]


Hi all, thanks for reading!

I am trying to build a device which will send a signal from a
transmitter to a reciever, simple as that!

What I need it for is this :-

I need to connect a jack lead from the monitor out socket of my mixing
desk, to a transmitter, which will then transmit to a reciever which
will be held on a trouser belt or in a back pocket to which a pair of
walkman headphones will be connected.

Thus creating an " IN EAR MONITORING SYSTEM" for stage, theatre etc.

In the UK (where I am based) I have been quoted as much as almost
ú2000.00 for this piece of equipment, which to me sounds astronomic!

Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what I would need to
build this device or where I should start looking?

Any help on this would be a real help

Cheerz

Ice!

PS The transmitting range would be no more than 20ft and I would
prefer radio rather than INFRA RED!


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (David E. Shelton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HF rig advice needed!!!
Date: 22 Mar 1996 03:32:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4it6vj$[e-mail]>

Hello all,

I have been cleaning my shack and I am progressing from my Icom IC-728. I want

the HF rig to end the hunt at least for a while, next couple years. I operate
primarily CW and I do operate some digital, packet and G-TOR. I would love to
hear the more experienced hams give me some advice on the rigs running between

$1000-$2200 price range. I am not going to mention the direction I have been
leaning but I do like the Ten Tec Omni VI a lot.

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

73,

de David, KE4FPS


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:21:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 28 Mar 1996 15:17:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4jes57$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)

Hmmm reading your message was very interesting.  I personally feel you
wrote the  message for 1 of 2 reasons.

1) Maybe you thought the Newsgroups were becoming quiet and thought that
writing a     message against HF would stir-up some activity!
2)  Maybe you have nothing else to write about!?!? and thought to yourself
hmmm who      can I put down today??

OK... well, theirs many aspects to the hobby and some people like HF and
others I
guess don't!  Personally, I find pleasure working DX and working
contests..  I have accomplished many awards for my working stations on HF.
ie: DXCC / WAS / WAZ and more. When, I get on HF I have normal
communications with fellow hams and also have my short exchanges too.  I
know people personally who hate HF only cause they are to lazy to upgrade
to have the HF privilege added to their license. So, you have a right to
hate HF but, if your justing going out and bashing the HFers like myself
you should at least write another message after upgrading from NO-CODE to
a higher class! "Just an idea!".  Basically, the ending to your message
saying "I've worked my share of HF, I thus I have not upgraded" only tells
people that you did this via CB radio or your willing to operate illegal
on bands you don't have rights too.  So, why should anyone care what you
think!!!!  If you don't like the laws that the FCC made in this country
then maybe move to another country where you don't have these rules to
follow.
  Well, I don't want to put you down or anything but you seem to have a
lot of problems    on your mind so maybe you should get some help!

                       Have fun complaining... HFer's BEWARE of people
like this!!
                                                      Jeffrey - N9MXT1


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Fellows)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 28 Mar 1996 21:57:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4jf20m$[e-mail]>
References: <4jes57$[e-mail]>


Even as I thought the original post was poorly thought out, I felt this respon
se
was even more disturbing.

So here is my counter response.


In article <4jes57$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (N9MXT1) writes:
|> Hmmm reading your message was very interesting.  I personally feel you
|> wrote the  message for 1 of 2 reasons.
|>
|> 1) Maybe you thought the Newsgroups were becoming quiet and thought that
|> writing a     message against HF would stir-up some activity!
|> 2)  Maybe you have nothing else to write about!?!? and thought to yourself
|> hmmm who      can I put down today??

Translation:

I can't argue against your point effectively, so I'm going to use a common
tactic that discredits your position.  This is to state without any attempt of
proof that the only reasons that you could possibly have for stating your
opinions are some illogical and immature ones.  This then gives me the upper
hand since I have belittled anything you might have as a point in one fell
swoop.



|>
|> OK... well, theirs many aspects to the hobby and some people like HF and
|> others I
|> guess don't!

Translation:

Here is my statement that shows how open minded I am, I will use it for counte
r
arguements later.  This is regardless of statements made below.


|> Personally, I find pleasure working DX and working
|> contests..  I have accomplished many awards for my working stations on HF.
|> ie: DXCC / WAS / WAZ and more.

Translation:

I'm a big bad-assed operator that has vast experience, so don't mess with me
sonny-boy.


|> When, I get on HF I have normal
|> communications with fellow hams and also have my short exchanges too.  I
|> know people personally who hate HF only cause they are to lazy to upgrade
|> to have the HF privilege added to their license. So, you have a right to
|> hate HF but,

Translation:

I have just called you lazy in a not-so-thinly veiled manner.  Since I can onl
y
conceive that the only reason that someone wouldn't like to do CW is that they
are beneath me and therefore lazy.  I can't just get it that someone may have
looked at the situation and made an intelligent observation that is contrary t
o
mine.


|> if your justing going out and bashing the HFers like myself
|> you should at least write another message after upgrading from NO-CODE to
|> a higher class!

Translation:

Since you have only the lowly-scum, barely worth anything license you can't
possbily know anything.  I've been around these here parts for a long time you
whipper-snapper, so don't try to tell me how it is.

|> "Just an idea!".  Basically, the ending to your message
|> saying "I've worked my share of HF, I thus I have not upgraded" only tells
|> people that you did this via CB radio or your willing to operate illegal
|> on bands you don't have rights too.

Translation:

I seem to have forgotten that someone without a license, or a "lower" class
license may operate a station at the priveleges of the control operator of tha
t
station.  I'll also throw in the showstopper, equating you with CB.  I know it
is equivalent in terms of credibility to just calling you a name, but hey, it
works.


|> So, why should anyone care what you
|> think!!!!

Translation:

Shut up!  You are nothing, you can have no opinions or observations since they
don't agree with mine.

|> If you don't like the laws that the FCC made in this country
|> then maybe move to another country where you don't have these rules to
|> follow.

Translation:

Yeah, what do you think this is?  A democracy or something?  Our founding
fathers fought against the status-quoe and tyranny so I can tell you to shut u
p
and take it or leave it.


|>   Well, I don't want to put you down or anything but you seem to have a
|> lot of problems    on your mind so maybe you should get some help!


Translation:

Here is my other attempt at trying to look genuinely open-minded, at least in
the first part of the sentence.  The rest is of course my feeble last stab at
discrediting anything you might say by name calling and insinuation.  Because,
of course, if you disagree with me then you must be crazy.

|>
|>                        Have fun complaining... HFer's BEWARE of people
|> like this!!
|>                                                       Jeffrey - N9MXT1


Have fun taunting and ridiculing...  Everyone BEWARE of people like this!!

Jim
KF6AGJ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:01 1996
From: "Bruce C. Raisley A.R.S. N9ZLE" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 21:56:52 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]>

Nathan Ryan Gingras wrote:
>
> Hey, all those no-code HAMS who complain about not getting on HF are not
> missing anything! Why would anyone want to be on HF? The conversations
> are always empty & meaningless, containing only the following standard info:
>
> 1) The Weather
> 2) Type of Radio
> 3) Signal strength
>
> The only in depth conversations I have ever had on HF were with people
> within 20 miles. You could use 2 meter, or 440 for that, and spend less
> on gear! What is the point of yelling CQ CQ CQ (or ponding CQ CQ CQ) just
> to get a stupid qsl card?
> As far as the three items listed above,
>
> #1, weather = You can watch TV for that.
>
> #2, radio gear = Who cares?
>
> #3, Signal Strength = Who Cares?
>
> The only good HF is QRP, because at least you are accomplishing something
> somewhat outstanding. Buying a $2000 rig accomplishes nothing, but
> wasting money. Anyone can work across the contry on a big 100w rig with a
> huge antenna.
>
> HF offers little enjoyment to people who are more than 'postcard
> chasers'. Even CB'ers, whom HF'ers seem to think are inferior, carry on
> more interesting conversations.
>
> Nate's suggestion for improving HF:
>
> 1) Instead of code, require a test in socialization & conversational skills.
>
> 2) Allow no more than 50w 40m and below.
>
> 3) Make it illegal to talk about root canals (noone cares!)
>
> 4) Require a physical & hygene exam! (I get sick every time I go to a
>    HamFest!)
>
> Just my thoughts. No-coders, you really aren't missing much, so if you
> can't learn code for whatever reason, don't sweat it! You can get better
> looking postcards at the corner drugstore, and you can have better
> conversations with local trees, and other vegitation.
>
> Nate.
>
> Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
> you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
> worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded.

Hey I agree, you should listen to 75meters, them bozos belong on the
chicken band, I take that back sorry CBers.

I have about 2 grand tied up in my HF rig and don't  use it much at
all. Mostly because the good bands are open durring the day
WHEN I'M AT WORK!, To many YOYOs like those at 3898 and 3950.
None of them are here because they can't read, got the license
by the grandfather claus I think.

For those who want to look me up!
I'm N9ZLE (GENERAL CLASS) I'll be Advanced in a few months.


CW is where its at! RTTY is good too.

                                        N9ZLE


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:03 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (charles copeland)
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 03:51:31 GMT

In article <4jelum$[e-mail]>,
Nathan Ryan Gingras <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>Hey, all those no-code HAMS who complain about not getting on HF are not
>missing anything! Why would anyone want to be on HF? The conversations
>are always empty & meaningless, containing only the following standard info:
>
>1) The Weather
>2) Type of Radio
>3) Signal strength

This is true to a large extent. Its difficult to find an interesting
conversation on HF. Hopefully all the old farts will die out and a
new younger crowd will fill in. I've found 2m MUCH more interesting
to listen to than HF. No code techs will inherit the ham bands.

(I'm a tech+ at 10wpm working for my general ... not sure why)

HF does have its appeal dispite the old boring farts. Its facinating
to have to ability to talk to others in foriegn countries.

>HF offers little enjoyment to people who are more than 'postcard
>chasers'. Even CB'ers, whom HF'ers seem to think are inferior, carry on
>more interesting conversations.

I differ on this. CB doesn't require a person to be able to read, and
its evident on what you hear on CB. Seems a number of CBer's are on 80m HF.

2m hams seem the friendliest, most interesting lot. I've traveled
across the USA and has many a fascinating conversation on 2m.

>Nate's suggestion for improving HF:
>1) Instead of code, require a test in socialization & conversational skills.
>2) Allow no more than 50w 40m and below.
>3) Make it illegal to talk about root canals (noone cares!)
>4) Require a physical & hygene exam! (I get sick every time I go to a
>   HamFest!)

I believe as the old farts die out the powers that be will get desperate
about probability of loosing ham bands. The code requirement will drop
for at least a few bands, and the ham community will be better for it.

>Just my thoughts. No-coders, you really aren't missing much, so if you
>can't learn code for whatever reason, don't sweat it! You can get better
>looking postcards at the corner drugstore, and you can have better
>conversations with local trees, and other vegitation.

Personally, I will struggle to 13wpm and get my general. The code
requirement may not be dropped for 5 years yet.

Some people love code, others hate it. I see code as celery.
Don't hate it, don't like it, just a painful dicipline you
must inflict on ones self to reach a goal, be it to loose
weight on a diet, or get my general lisense.

I think the die-hard code-will-never-die hams don't want the code
requirement dropped because it was so difficult for them to pass.
Things were much stricter in 1930, not to mention they had to
walk a mile in the snow with no shoes, use two pieces of wire
to crank out 20wpm under the scrutiny of stern FCC officials.

>Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
>you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
>worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded.

KC5LWF here, eating celery, and learning code.

-.. .-. --- .--.  -.-. --- -.. .  .-. . --.- ..- .. .-. . -- . -. - !




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:05 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 1996 08:30:14 -0500
Message-ID: <4jgol6$[e-mail]>


In article <4jelum$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
 w
rites:
>Hey, all those no-code HAMS who complain about not getting on HF are not
>missing anything! Why would anyone want to be on HF? The conversations
>are always empty & meaningless, containing only the following standard info:
>
>1) The Weather
>2) Type of Radio
>3) Signal strength
>
>The only in depth conversations I have ever had on HF were with people
>within 20 miles. You could use 2 meter, or 440 for that, and spend less
>on gear! What is the point of yelling CQ CQ CQ (or ponding CQ CQ CQ) just
>to get a stupid qsl card?
>As far as the three items listed above,
>
>#1, weather = You can watch TV for that.
>
>#2, radio gear = Who cares?
>
>#3, Signal Strength = Who Cares?
>
>
>The only good HF is QRP, because at least you are accomplishing something
>somewhat outstanding. Buying a $2000 rig accomplishes nothing, but
>wasting money. Anyone can work across the contry on a big 100w rig with a
>huge antenna.

What's the point of running QRP  if the QSO's are mindless boring crap???
    Somewhere I am missing a point ????

    Dick K8WHA

    >
>HF offers little enjoyment to people who are more than 'postcard
>chasers'. Even CB'ers, whom HF'ers seem to think are inferior, carry on
>more interesting conversations.
>
>
>Nate's suggestion for improving HF:
>
>
>1) Instead of code, require a test in socialization & conversational skills.
>
>2) Allow no more than 50w 40m and below.
>
>3) Make it illegal to talk about root canals (noone cares!)
>
>4) Require a physical & hygene exam! (I get sick every time I go to a
>   HamFest!)
>
>
>Just my thoughts. No-coders, you really aren't missing much, so if you
>can't learn code for whatever reason, don't sweat it! You can get better
>looking postcards at the corner drugstore, and you can have better
>conversations with local trees, and other vegitation.
>
>
>Nate.
>
>
>Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
>you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
>worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded.
>
>
>
>


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:07 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Monty Wilson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: HF!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 22:13:40 GMT
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras) wrote:
>...Why would anyone want to be on HF? The conversations
>are always empty & meaningless....

I have had conversations on HF regarding the following subjects:

Model airplane flying
What kind of traffic can be heard on railroad frequencies
'60s Mustangs
What life is like in the jungles of Honduras
Antenna design
The effects of low line voltage on radio power supplies and stability
Birdwatching
Telescopes
Bicycling
Automatic sprinkler systems
and many more.

Of course there are always those folks that want to exchange signal
reports and sign off; that is their way.  They like to hear and give
signal reports.  There are many hams on the air doing things I can't
imagine being enjoyable to me.  But it's a big hobby and there is no
accounting for taste.

I hardly ever call CQ.  If the band's not open, calling on it will get
you nowhere, and if it is open, there's usually an interesting
conversation going on that you can hear, you just have to tune around
and find it.  If two people are discussing something of interest to me
and one of them has to sign off, I wait until they're finished and call
the remaining station.

Why are your conversations always empty and meaningless when others are
having real fun ragchewing on HF?

>...The only in depth conversations I have ever had on HF were with people
>within 20 miles. You could use 2 meter, or 440 for that, and spend less
>on gear!

Yes but it's the people, not the distance, that make the conversation more
interesting.  For example, if I hear you and a friend 15 miles from your
house discussing Alfred Hitchcock movies on 40m ground wave, and you have
to sign off, then I could give him a call and see what he thinks about
"Suspicion" being colorized.  THAT is something I could not do if you had
been talking on 2m or 440.

>What is the point of yelling CQ CQ CQ (or ponding CQ CQ CQ) just
>to get a stupid qsl card?

Why do you mention cards; if you're not interested in collecting them,
don't ask for them.

>...The only good HF is QRP, because at least you are accomplishing something
>somewhat outstanding.

Says who?  There's no accounting for taste.  Sure, I got an extra thrill
with my CB conversions knowing I could work countries on 10m and 12m with
just a few watts output, but by far the biggest enjoyment were the people
with whom I was talking.

> Buying a $2000 rig accomplishes nothing, but
>wasting money.

For me, yes it would be a waste of money.  But it might not be if I was
going for DXCC or something which could be accomplished more easily with
all the bells and whistles.  My HF radio cost me $700, the one before that
was about $500 and my first rig cost $135.

> Anyone can work across the contry on a big 100w rig with a
>huge antenna.

Sure, but if you hate HF why bother?

>HF offers little enjoyment to people who are more than 'postcard
>chasers'.

Well I guess I'm less than a postcard chaser because it sure gives me
a real kick.

>Nate's suggestion for improving HF:
>
>
>1) Instead of code, require a test in socialization & conversational skills.

Have you started studying yet?

>2) Allow no more than 50w 40m and below.

Why these magic numbers?  If fifty watts is enough on forty meters, then
why not on thirty meters also?

>3) Make it illegal to talk about root canals (noone cares!)...

If no one cares about a subject then making it illegal would be a waste
of effort.  A conversation about a subject presupposes that there are
at least two people who care about it.

--
.........Monty.
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Vincent Chan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How do you like your Yaesu FT-3000M?
Date: 24 Mar 1996 19:37:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4j489j$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4irh02$[e-mail]>

Hi Dale,
  Is 3000M the new model after 2500M? I have a 2500M and I am happy. What
is new in the 3000M, briefly? Please email reply. Thanks
73
de Simon YR2YRD

Dalevanbat ([e-mail]) wrote:
: David,
: Just got the 3000M 2 days ago. It takes some getting used to to program
: but after 4 cups of coffee it was easy. So far I like it. I'll have more
: thoughts on it in a couple weeks. It does have expanded rx. 110-180,
: 300-520, 800-999 however cell is blocked. ARS is nice. 70 watts high is
: claimed, mine is almost 90 on high, 10 low. It has 2 cooling fans on fins
: instead of one. From mic you can control DTMF,tuning,menu programming,
: backlight,sever user programmable features, power levels, VFO.
: Given a couple of weeks to get used to it maybe I'll feel more comfortable
: and have a better idea of how well it performs.

: Dale   N3WUH


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:08 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Enno)
Subject: How to catch ArtSci magazine?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 19:23:09 GMT

Hi there,

Can anyone help me to get the e-mail, fax number or POBox of the
publishers of ArtSci mag?

TNX

Enno,      [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:09 1996
From: Horace Ory <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How to catch ArtSci magazine?
Date: 28 Mar 1996 10:39:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4jdq9l$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

If you mean ArtSci Publishing, try:

     EMail:  [e-mail]

or

     Web:    http://home.earthlink.net/~artsci




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:10 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Boackle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT Battery Suppliers - Who the Best?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 22:29:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4isl8l$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

I bought a battery pack for W & W associates which is rated 600mah and it
seems to last just as long as the stock battery.  The price for the
replacement battery was MUCH less than a factory battery from any other
radio supplier.  I have only had the battery about a month or so, but I
have not had any problems.

best wishes...
73 de KC5AAW   (88's to KC5NTA)
---
David A. Boackle   [e-mail]   Mississippi State University


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:11 1996
From: "Irina N. Borisova" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: I look for metal detectors creators for information exchange.(No letter)
Date: 28 Mar 1996 22:03:02 +0300
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:12 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clint Bradford)
Date: 25 Mar 96 17:21:00
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: I NEED MODS FOR FT-530
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


>>I have just ordered a ft-530 and would like to have any mods for this
>>radio...

There's too many to post, Jerry! I saw at least ten files on the FT-530
on ATTENTION to Details BBS at 909-681-6210 in their MODS - YAESU File
Area!


[e-mail]
---
 * TLX v4.00 * Thesaurus: ancient reptile with an excellent vocabulary.
 * wcECHO 4.1 ~ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details * Mira Loma, CA * 909-681-6221
--
|Fidonet:  Clint Bradford 1:2619/228
|Internet: [e-mail]
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:13 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC 706 CROSSBAND SPLIT???
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 17:43:26 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

does anyone know how to make the 706 do crossband split? i would like to use
it for the rs10 and rs 12 sattelites but looks like split only works in single

band
thanks
barry
wb1edi


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mark Boyer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706 - Looking for likes/dislikes....
Date: 26 Mar 1996 15:16:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4j91o7$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j6up6$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mark Boyer)

> watty ([e-mail]) wrote:
> : I am looking at the IC-706 as a possible mobile rig. I was wondering if
> : anyone who has/had one would recommend it, or any weakness it has.
>
>
> :             Thanks,
>
> :             N2RDD
> :             [e-mail]

If you plan on using it for a lot of 2 metre mobile or even base for that
matter you will want to preprogram all your repeater freqs into memory.
Not someting you would want to try while moving.

Also no DTMF for autopatch.  Other than that it's a pretty good rig.

73

--
Mark Boyer VE3MJB   [e-mail]

"Beauty is skin deep and ugly is to the bone and you ugly"
        Fred Sanford to his sister-in-law


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Martin Moerman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706 - Looking for likes/dislikes....
Date: 25 Mar 1996 20:13:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6up6$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

1: No tuning option !!! (only when original tuner from icom is bought).
2: Not all the filters are included..

Further the unit works great, this is a radio for life..

Martin.


watty ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I am looking at the IC-706 as a possible mobile rig. I was wondering if
: anyone who has/had one would recommend it, or any weakness it has.


:               Thanks,

:               N2RDD
:               [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:16 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706/AT-180 mobile operation problems
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Fred McKenzie)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:08:11 -0500
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, Rastislav Slosiar
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> Anyone tried to setup an IC-706 with the associated AT-180 into his car?

Rasti-

I'm running that combination with good results.  I have observed the
problem you mentioned on a couple of occasions.

In one case, I was trying to use a Hustler 40 Meter resonator on 10
Meters.  I had been successful with that combination using the TS-50 and
AT-50, but the Icom was barely able to match it.  Then, the light would
blink while transmitting, indicating that it wasn't a perfect match.

In another case, I tried a 160 Meter antenna on the same mount, which
happens to be a magnet-mount.  When using an MFJ-249 SWR meter, the
antenna appeared to be a perfect match.  When trying to match it, it
appeared to match after trying for a while.  However, the light would
blink while transmitting, and sometimes go off.

I have come to the conclusion that something in the antenna system is not
linear!  At low power levels when the tuner is tuning, one condition
exists.  At higher levels when transmitting, another condition exists, and
is probably the result of an arc through the paint on the roof of the
car.  In other words, I don't have a good ground at 1.8 MHz.

In your case, you may only have a marginal match.  On the other hand, it
is always a possibility there is an arc condition or loose connection
causing your problem.

I have also observed that the AT-180 doesn't match as wide a range of SWR
as the Kenwood AT-50.  I understand that there is a minor mod or switch
adjustment in the AT-180, that will reduce its sensitivity to reflected
power.  I haven't tried it yet, but it might be all you need to resolve
your problem.

73, Fred, K4DII


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:17 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ic-w21at
Date: 22 Mar 1996 03:57:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4it8ek$[e-mail]>
References: <4i82ug$[e-mail]> <4iljq9$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

In <4iljq9$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jeremy A. Donimirski)
 writes:
>On my W21AT, I did the button presses mentioned below and it does not
>even accept the frequency I enter (I'm entering a 460 MHz frequency).
>It behaves like it did out of the box - you press a "5" in UHF mode and
>the display instantly displays "445 " MHz.  Any useful hints as to what
>I'm doing wrong?  I'll be grateful...
>
>Jeremy  WA7YGB
>
>ps.  My serial # is 02266
>

Having owned the radio for a year, a year ago,  I think I can be of assistance
...
After doing the display test Light-B-#, go into the set mode, I belive that th
is is
function-8, look for the PL function, it will be set to 1..  Turn the tuning d
ial until
in displays 100...

PL stands for decimal PLacement...  If set to 1 (as is the default) then 1 mea
ns
the you will be entering 1.000 MHz increments, whereis 100 means 100.000 MHz.
This should let you directly enter any frequency 800 or whatever...
If it still isn't receiving, then it may not be capable of getting cell, but t
his should
at least get you out of the 440 band!

Good luck!
 Steve
 N2RWE


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Kay)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ic2400h vs. ft2500 ???
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 23:10:25 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Larry
Brown) wrote:

> I'm in the market for a new 2m mobile rig. The ic2400h and ft2500 are
> the two units on my shopping list right now. Looking to decide which
> is best. My operational needs are simple, either unit meets them fine.
>
> One major requirement is durability. The Yaesu with their mil-spec.
> appears to win here, but the Icom looks pretty durable as well.
>
> Intermod rejection is important, since the radio will be used in the
> house with a large antenna at times.
>
> Any comments on either of these radios would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks, Larry
> n6txx



     According to the QST review of a number of 2 meter rigs (in 95, I
think), the FT 2500 is hands down the best for intermod rejection.  I'd
get one if I didn't want autodial capabilities.
                           73,  Dave   AB7FV


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:19 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Feldman)
Subject: IC706: use of FL223 as primary SSB filter
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 16:24:45 GMT

Would it be possible to replace the main SSB IF filter in the IC706 with the
optional FL223? If so, then it would make SSB "narrow" by default, but that
would be fine for my mobile usage (where I don't care about sound fidelity),
and would let me install a narrow CW filter in the remaining optional
position. While I suspect one might have to slightly adjust the transmit SSB
offset (it is a front panel option during SSB mode) I suspect it might work.

Has anyone tried this?

73 Dave WB0GAZ [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Greene)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC745 frequncy shift/distortion problems
Date: 29 Mar 96 22:11:38 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Keywords: IC 745 freq shift problem



Hello,

I was talking to a friend ont he radio a few days ago
and noticed he was having a bad frequency shift/drift
problem.  His rig is an Icom IC745.  While he was
transmitting, at first I noticed a steady 100Hz/minute
downward frequncy drift that went on for about 4 minutes
steadily, then it abruptly jumped down about 2.5KHz and started
distorting very badly.  Then it just jumped back to the original
frequency we had started on and the problem went away.  Then
it did the same thing about 7 - 10 minutes later.

He said that this has been reported to him before, so I
assume my radio wasn't the problem.

Does anyone know what this problem might be or what
a fix might be, or perhaps a good way to start troubleshooting
it?  please email me at [e-mail]


Tnx,
Dave  aa9bi


--
--
Dave Greene        Heurikon Corp.        800-356-9602


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:21 1996
From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 2AT Mods
Date: 26 Mar 1996 14:26:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4j8uql$[e-mail]>
References: <4iijdn$[e-mail]>

If iz a IC-02AT...Cut the "white wire" fer the opened
TX/RX...I had the same ht abt 10yrs ago....My buddy
did the mod and that's all I can remember....

[e-mail]

p.s. I f and serial config iz 36,000 or over NEW mod!



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Proxima)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom IC-Z1A
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 05:00:22 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Has anyone seen Icom's new IC-Z1A?  I just received my amateur license
and am looking for a good HT.  The ads I've seen for this model show
some very nice features.

Any ideas?

Any comments?

Thanks,

Proxima


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:23 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM-738 mod?
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 18:57:17 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

If you have any information to make the IC-738 transmit in all bands,
please, send me it. I need it, because in my country is imposible to find
any information about Icom equipments. Thanks.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:23 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM-738 MOD??
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:07:42 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

If you have any information about ICOM 738 mods, please send me it by
email. In my country is imposible to find any information about ICOM
equipments.

Thank you very,very,very.... much.
email: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (Larry Woram)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Impressions Kenwood TS-850
Date: 24 Mar 96 14:07:56 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I would like to receive any comments on the Kenwood TS-850. Has anyone had
problems with it? How does it operate on RTTY? I have heard there are
feedback problems with it and the MC-80 microphone. True? Solution? Thanks
for your comments. 73 Larry VE3WLN.
Wherever you go in the world, you just have
to say you're Canadian and people laugh.
John Candy 1988



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:26 1996
From: AC6V <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Impressions Kenwood TS-850
Date: 24 Mar 1996 15:25:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4j3phr$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Larry Woram) wrote:
>I would like to receive any comments on the Kenwood TS-850. Has anyone had
>problems with it? How does it operate on RTTY? I have heard there are
>feedback problems with it and the MC-80 microphone. True? Solution? Thanks
>for your comments. 73 Larry VE3WLN.
>Wherever you go in the world, you just have
>to say you're Canadian and people laugh.
>John Candy 1988
>
Hi Larry. I have owned a TS-850SAT for several years and have had no
problems with the rig other than having to readjust the master oscillator
periodically. Kenwood offers a pricey Hi stability oscillator though.
Features I particularly like are as follows:

Quick Memo for temporary storage of frequencies -- great for DXing and
arranging QSYing.
CW Reverse - works well in CW pileups
RF Power Control -- mine reduces power to 5 to 6 Watts so I can play QRP
(106 QRP countries worked with TS-850 and an R5)
Speech Processor and High Boost really pumps up the highs for busting
pileups (with MC-80 Mic).
Allows the use of the Kenwood Bandscope which I find very useful (RTTY
Tuning and spotting band activity and checking TX output)
Auto Tuner works well. Won't load a wet noodle but surprising what it will
load up into.
Excellent audio reports.
Tune button for zero beating is a nice feature.
Fine button for critical tuning i.e., Digital signals.

My voice recorder module works well for contesting.

RE: The feedback problem on the digital mode. I first used the audio
inputs on the rear panel and experienced feedback problems, so I feed the
AEA 232MBX FSK outputs to the FSK inputs of the TS-850SAT and have no
feedback problems with that configuration. Got to compensate for frequency
readout however.

The TS-850SAT has BIG final stages and it will run all day at 100 Watts
without over-heating. Some have adjusted the output up to 200 Watts but I
would not recommend same. Had to tweak mine slightly to get 100 Watts out
on 10 Meters. Easy to do.

Allows AM and FM operation -- the AM is so so. FM works well.
The TF-Set button is great for working a split pileup - allows u to listen
momentarily to the freq u will TX on.
The RF Power Control is handy for adjusting the drive to a Linear.

All in all a great rig, but I am sure the Icom, Ten-Tech, Yaseu and others
are excellent as well. Ford, Chevy, Plymouth -- take ur choice. Go to a
buddies shack and operate them for a coupla hours -- see if the rig likes
you and vice versa.

Some "entry" level radios have no RF Gain control -- I won't be without
one.  I usually set the RF Gain down a bit and the audio gain up -- helps
the subjective noise level. Old CW ops trick.

Kenwood puts the RF and AF Gain controls on the right hand side and I'm
right handed. Others are left handed radios HI HI. A minor point.

With the advent of the DSP Radios -- the TS-850 is not the latest in
technology. Not sure what DSP Radio I would buy until I could operate and
check them all out. Was not overly impressed with the DSP stuff I have
tried but haven't used them extensively.

Anyway some impressions from a user.

Good luck
73
Rod

--
*****************************************************************
Hark! I Have Hurled My Words To The Far Reaches Of The Earth!
What King Of Old Could Do Thus ?  --- AC6V
*****************************************************************
A Man May Know Of The World Without Leaving The Shelter Of His
Own Home!
Loa-Tsze
*****************************************************************




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (LRVvsPCC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Is Chuck Harders PRN 1000 shortwave RCVR any good?
Date: 26 Mar 1996 17:28:59 -0500
Message-ID: <4j9r3b$[e-mail]>
References: <4iqban$[e-mail]>

i think it is absolutly great reception

george e hale


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Kay)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: KENNWOOD TH-79 AD Mods
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 23:03:21 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

     I have the mods for the TH 79 A - are they the same for the TH79 AD?
If you have done the mods on either radio, was the radio's resistance to
intermod affected by the mod?  Was the radio affected in any other way?
I only want to get the recieve of the 460 MHz police band.

                                    Thanks!,  73's,  Dave


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:28 1996
From: Bill Crocker <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood 870 ,Icom 775 or YAESU FT-1000mp?
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:34:19 -0300
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j85ct$[e-mail]>

Carlos Ramirez wrote:
>
> Just for a curiosity which of the three is the best. First, consider overall
> performance and second, the best value . Does the 870 has dual frequency
> receive?
> Carlos

Carlos:

No, it does not.  Other than that, it's a super radio!

Bill Crocker


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:29 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Stockton)
Subject: Re: Kenwood 870 ,Icom 775 or YAESU FT-1000mp?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 16:38:27 GMT
References: <4j85ct$[e-mail]>

Carlos Ramirez ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Just for a curiosity which of the three is the best. First, consider overall

: performance and second, the best value .


      They all have their problems.  TS870 uses DSP for all main
filtering, but after too much gain/AGC, so suffers bad close-in overload
before the signal reaches the digits. Sounds and works fabulously on less
than demanding conditions.  775 has possibility of fitting narrow option
filters to fix this problem, but then you get the standard analogue
filter performance of one of the very best radios, the 765, with what is
*equivalent* to a DSP *audio* filter behind it. FT1000MP is similar to 775.

   It may take some time before analogue to digital converters get
improved to the point where they can equal the best of the all-analogue
radios, then DSP will have really arrived. You can do wonders processing
signals digitally only AFTER you've converted them to digital form.
Things are changing so rapidly, whichever you buy will be obsolescent, fast.


    For that money, I'd insist on a radio with an upgrade path!


   cheers
            David  GM4ZNX


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:30 1996
From: Eric <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: KENWOOD TH415E
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 18:57:43 -0100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4ijvsq$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4iu54f$[e-mail]> <4j2rrd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

I'm looking for the instructions manual of the KENWOOD TH415E UHF FM
Transceiver.

Could anyone help me ?

Thanks,

Eric.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Scott Remington)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TM-733 New Version
Date: 26 Mar 1996 22:18:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9qf1$[e-mail]>
References: <4ittut$[e-mail]>

In article <4ittut$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>Can anyone confirm if the new 733's have a built in duplexer, I know they
>have the backlit mike?
>
>Thanks!
>
>[e-mail]

If you check out Kenwood's web site, they specifically say the duplexer is
external.  And I just bought one of the suckers about a week before this
announcement!

KC7MRV



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:34 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM-733A 800Mhz Receive?
Date: 24 Mar 1996 03:08:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2ec8$[e-mail]>

Is there a mod on a Kenwood TM-733A to receive 800 Mhz like for the TM-732?
Thanks.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:35 1996
From: "Bruce C. Raisley A.R.S. N9ZLE" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM-733A CrossBand Repeat
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 22:09:58 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have the Kenwood TM733A, The radio works fine for all I need.

But I have thought about putting up a reapeater. By using TWO TM733s
I can configure a repeater for both the 440 band and 2 meters by using
the rigs in cunjunction with each other.Both haveing a remote/recieve
site. this will give a user on either band access to both. Enough said.

My problem is putting together an identifier for the system, I can
create the identifier, BUT the 733A will not allow itself to be keyed
when in crossband repeate mode, by mike or data conector.

Q. Is there any way of defeating this problem?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:36 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mike Saville)
Subject: Kenwood TM-742A Info needed
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 17:19:39 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Need information where to find the command string for the
Kenwood TM-742A. I know there is a note or document
available for the TM-733A, I can't find that either. If
any one knows where I can access that on the net, please
let me know. thanks


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TR-2500
Date: 24 Mar 1996 09:29:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (Ryan A. Perkins) wrote:

>
>
>My dad has aquired a secondhand Kenwood TR-2500 handheld 2m FM Transeiver.
>It came with a buch of stuff, car adapter, AC adapter, hand mike etc..
>
>The problem is there is no manual. Both him and I have played with the
>radio for a fair while, with very little success on making it do anything
>more than the basics.
>
>My dad claims to have attempted to contact Kenwood. If anyone has a
>source for manuals, or is even willing to provide some very basic
>operating instructions, let me know.
>
>Also: a source for batteries would be nice. All of the rechargeables
>that came with it would not hold a charge. A hack was made, using a battery
>case, and a bunch of AA's, but the proper rechargables would be nice.
>
>Please EMail, as I don't read this group often. If intrest is expressed
>in what I found, I will summarize.
>
>Thank you.
>--
>  Ryan Perkins - 1:340/44    | I feel that suicide jumpers see a glimpse of
>[e-mail] | sanity as they throw themselves from the ledge
.
>Ask for PGP 2.6.2 public key | That's why they scream all the way down.
>          8C5357 : 9F FF BA 93 54 D5 18 78 4B 1E DA GC E3 4E

Ryan,
Since you are surfing the internet, search for Ham Radio Outlet home
page. There, you will fond ArtSci info. ArtSci publishes a book called
"Lost Users Manual". It has alot of good info in it. It should show
you how to operate your radio. It sells for $19.95.
73's
Bill
N0EVG


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:39 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TS-520S Scematic Needed
Date: 20 Mar 1996 05:22:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4io4mm$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Hi...
I am looking for the scematic for the TS-520S.  There is a TX problem
in mine and I have not reference to go by.  Any help would be appreciated.
You can e-mail me and we can work out reembursment for printing and mail.
Thanks and 73!
Patrick/KB0BRO


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robert Young)
Subject: Kenwood TS-870S Mods Wanted
Date: 26 Mar 96 10:36:03 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Wanted:

I'm looking for any mods for the Kenwood TS-870S.
I need the extended TX/RX mod (ie Mars/CAP) for this radio.
The new Yaesu FT-1000MP uses a software mod for expanded
coverage and I was wondering if the Kenwood TS-870 does
likewise. I would also appreciate any comments good or bad
this radio as I missed the recent QST review.

Thanks!

73 de N9MSS Bob


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:40 1996
From: Larry D'Anna <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-870S Mods Wanted
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 17:34:21 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Robert Young wrote:
>
> Wanted:
>
> I'm looking for any mods for the Kenwood TS-870S.
> I need the extended TX/RX mod (ie Mars/CAP) for this radio.
> The new Yaesu FT-1000MP uses a software mod for expanded
> coverage and I was wondering if the Kenwood TS-870 does
> likewise. I would also appreciate any comments good or bad
> this radio as I missed the recent QST review.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 73 de N9MSS Bob

Bob I have had the 870 for 3 months now.  I find it excellent. I am able to pi
ck
out signals I was unable to with my other rig (FT890 Yaesu) Un fortunatly it i
s in
the shop now with  a bad optical encoder. When I try to slowly tune in a stati
on
the frequency will stop incrementing.  I am wondering if anyone out there has
had
this problem or any other problems showing up?
73  LArry Wa3kok


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Ashworth)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: LogWindows Reflector
Date: 26 Mar 96 01:31:30 GMT
Message-ID: <9603260124.AA18343@adphdw20>

A reflector for technical support and other inquiries related to AEA's
LogWindows program has been established. If interested, send a message to:


[e-mail]

Leave the subject blank

In the text, type: subscribe <insert your address here>


After a few minutes, a message will return confirming your subscription.
Neither I nor the reflector are associated with AEA.

Enjoy,

Dennis, K7FL



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gilles BARBE)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Looking for IC706 Mods
Date: 25 Mar 1996 17:33:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6lcl$[e-mail]>

I have got a tranverter that allow to convert between 20-30MHz to 430-440MHz.
But unfortunatly the IC706 refused the go on air if we do not use the Radio Ha
m bands.
How can i have this faculty?

73 F1JTN op: Gilles
See you soon on the AIR
et a bientot sur l'air


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:43 1996
From: [e-mail] (Williams - Debbie)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Maggiore Repeaters???
Date: 24 Mar 1996 01:05:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4j274i$[e-mail]>

Looking for opinions from anyone using a Maggiore repeater, especially
in a harsh environment (an unheated, un-air conditioned building).

We're considering one for a club repeater and would greatly appreciate
your comments!

Thanks and 73s,
Debbie, N5SKA




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Kauffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Maxon SP-2550 info - help
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 21:51:53 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi

   I was woundering if anyone out there can tell me about the Maxon
SP-2000 series handheld VHF radios.  I've come across three units and a
charger - no batteries though.  The lititure that came with the radio is
sparce.

   My questions are:

   1. Are these radios rock bound or synthesised?

   2. If synthesised, what kind of unit is needed to program the radio?

   3. Is there a supplier (other than Maxon) of batteries for these units?

Thank you in advance.

Jim Kauffman - N7TTO
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kirk James Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MaxTrac pinout
Date: 29 Mar 1996 00:51:29 -0800
Message-ID: <4jg8ah$[e-mail]>

I'm looking for the pinout of the 5 pin accessory connector on a Motorola
MaxTrac mobile radio.  I'm hoping there's a microphone connector in
there.  Can someone provide the info?


--
 Kirk J. Smith, KD6RCT, EMT-P    |  Biological Sciences Dept, Microbiology
 [e-mail]    |  California Polytechnic State University
 http://www.calpoly.edu/~kjsmith |  San Luis Obispo, California, USA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (George McCrary)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ Artificial Ground
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 18:54:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4j45r8$[e-mail]>
References: <4j25fi$[e-mail]>

I had very good success with the Art. Ground in two different QTHs.
Now, nothing in the present location because I've got a good ground.
Either you have a malfunctioning Art. Gnd., or maybe your ground is
better than you think.


                                        73 DE KQ4QM (George)



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ Artificial Ground
Date: 24 Mar 1996 11:18:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4j3skg$[e-mail]>
References: <4j25fi$[e-mail]>

In article <4j25fi$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Lonnie)
writes:

>
>Does anyone know if the MFJ Artificial Ground really works. I've
>followed the directions to the tee and can't get the RF Ground Current
>meter to come off the peg. I'm starting to wonder if it's really worth
>having. My problem is, my HF station is on the second story of my home.
>So a short ground is not possible. I was told that if you connect the
>ground to this unit that it can be tuned so that RF gound would appear
>to be right next to the radio. Anyone's thoughts please...
>
>73's
>Lonnie

Reduce the power Lonnie to peak the meter. All the Artificial ground does
is reduce the reactance of the ground lead. Once it's tuned for maximum
meter reading, you're all set. I *think* there is a pot inside that sets
the sensitivity, you may ask them. If there is, turn it down.

Even if you have a "balanced" antenna, you still may have RF problems.
Thay can occur when the feedline isn't properly installed, such as coax
feeding a dipole.

In that case, a CHOKE TYPE balun will help things. The choke balun can be
as simple as several turns of coax in a single layer winding several
inches in diameter to as complicated  as a string of ferrite beads over
the cable. It will help a great deal with RF in the shack.

What type of antenna are you using?

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ Artificial Ground
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 96 18:59:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc3is$[e-mail]>
References: <4j25fi$[e-mail]> <4j45r8$[e-mail]> <4j5fd3$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail](LARRY PIKE ) wrote:

>Hey - why not spend a few extra bucks and go all the way --
>buy a REAL ground!

What type of ground are you referring to?  It's almost impossible to
achieve a good RF ground with ground rods.  Even if you bury a couple
of junk cars and weld them together (I know someone who did that), the
length of the ground wire creates a series impedance that varies with
frequency.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile broadcast equipment
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:06:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc3or$[e-mail]>
References: <4j6a9q$[e-mail]> <4j9u2j$[e-mail]>

Bob:

        The NewsGroup mentioned below is:  alt.radio.pirate

Tony.
________________snipped for text____________________

>[e-mail] (Bob Baxter) wrote:
>>What kind of equipment would someone need to do low transmission
>>broadcasting in the AM frequency.  I know that a transmitter and antenna
>>would be required.  What about low voltage power sources for mobile use?
>________________________________

>Bob,

>Are you SURE you want to use AM?!  There are a number of really fine FM
>Stereo Transmitter kits, for not too much money...  More good news,  they
>are fully transistorized and without  too much effort, you can use a car
>battery and stay on the air for a  LONG  time.

>I think there may even be a Newsgroup for folks that use such devices?
>They discuss all types of 'boards' and modifications for greater range...
____________________snipped for content______________




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile broadcast equipment
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 23:17:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9u2j$[e-mail]>
References: <4j6a9q$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Bob Baxter) wrote:
>What kind of equipment would someone need to do low transmission
>broadcasting in the AM frequency.  I know that a transmitter and antenna
>would be required.  What about low voltage power sources for mobile use?
________________________________

Bob,

Are you SURE you want to use AM?!  There are a number of really fine FM
Stereo Transmitter kits, for not too much money...  More good news,  they
are fully transistorized and without  too much effort, you can use a car
battery and stay on the air for a  LONG  time.

I think there may even be a Newsgroup for folks that use such devices?
They discuss all types of 'boards' and modifications for greater range.  A
few talked about a amplifier that can be attached for watts of output
power, however, such operations would be in clear violation of FCC rules
and regulations.  I sure would not recommend it.

The only things I can recall about such AM efforts is a AC operated AM
transmitter I have... It was designed for 'drive-by' open houses, where a
external tape recorder/loop would mention the highlights of the property...
A sign outside reads something like:  "Tune Your AM radio to 1500 for more
information about the property".   Frequency is adjusted with a knob.
(Yours for $50).  It is transistorized so you may be able to modify it for
mobile use.

The second item was a AC, one or two tube (117P7 or ??) 'oscillator' that
happend to work ok in the AM Band...  'Miller'  made the special coil that
was required.  I recall seeing the coil in the Allied and Newark catalogs
many moons ago.

Tony
WA6IGJ




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:52 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bob Baxter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mobile broadcast equipment
Date: 25 Mar 1996 09:23:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4j6a9q$[e-mail]>

Hi there,

What kind of equipment would someone need to do low transmission
broadcasting in the AM frequency.  I know that a transmitter and antenna
would be required.  What about low voltage power sources for mobile use?

Thanks,
Bob



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Collin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile HF tranceiverrs??
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 22:33:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4j76sd$[e-mail]>
References: <4j0s7h$[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Maurice Andries) wrote:

>Hi all,

>I'm planning to get some kind of mobile HF tranceiver in the near future. I'v
e
>read the review in QST about the IC-706 and it didn't convince me 100% to go
>out and buy one.
>What I would like to know is: What are the pro's and con's of tranceivers lik
e
>IC-706, TS-50, DX-70....

>The TS-50 has proven itself already (from what I've heard) but the others
>offer extra bands. Is the extra cost worth it? And most important: how do the
y
>behave 'on air'??

You're missing the best HF mobile on the market (IMHO) the Yaesu
FT900/AT ... while not as small as the others, it has a removable
faceplate (the TS50 doesn't) so you can mount the main radio in the
trunk ... and it has a built-in autotuner.  My favorite feature is
that it has a "normal" interface ... one function buttons and knobs
.. no mickey-mouse multi-function buttons, knobs, and menus ...
important when I'm doin' 70 mph and 30 wpm CW (yes, CW only here) ...
its audio output is FAR superior to the others (important with wind
and road noise).  It makes a great home rig, too.  The receiver is
very sensitive (good!) and with the optional filters for SSB and CW,
it's selectivity is absolutely excellent ...

I had to make the same decision last year when I bought it, and
decided that 6 meters didn't excite me (and 10W on the Alinco just
won't cut it anyway) and that I'd prefer a nice 50 watt full-featured
2m FM mobile to the 10W all-mode in the Icom.  You may have other
criteria, tho ...

There's also the TenTec Scout 555, which a local guy here SWEARS by,
but it didn't excite me ...

good luck with whatever ya do ... 73







From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:54 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mocom 70 & DTMF Mike
Date: 27 Mar 1996 20:21:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc7vj$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

A fellow ham has a Uhf Mocom 70 mobile and a Motorola DTMF Mike from
a Syntor radio. All appears well with the exception of the  "*" & "#" keys.
Any suggestions or comments to activate the buttons??

Thanks in advance - KF4FIX


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:55 1996
From: Boerge Ravn-OZ8BR/SM0EBP <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MOD Wanted: FT-1000MP
Date: 27 Mar 1996 19:35:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc5ab$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Hi Richard!

The Question - & the replies are gone!! HI
It can be done - a good, stable, clean signal generator is expensive.
If one can find/or make an attenuator I think you can make your rig into
a rather good s.g.
Of course you dont't connect a s.g. to an antenna - HI.
But - where can one find a good attenuator, with 10 dB steps over a
range of 100 dB - I am looking on all flea-markets for an old
"slaughterable" generator!
73's from Stockholm, where we are hoping for spring - temp right now up
& down around freezing, but the days are getting longer - in the coming
week-end we are switching to "DST
Boerge




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:56 1996
From: "David H. Malin" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for the Yaesu 51R ?
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 18:14:11 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Looking for the mods to transmit out of band for the 51r and clues?
--
*****************************************
*                                       *
*     Dave H. Malin                     *
*     30447 N. Sunrose Pl               *
*     Canyon Country,Ca 91351           *
*     Home 805-298-0300                 *
*     Work 213-485-2918                 *
* ------------------------------------- *
*     Communications Electrican         *
*     City Of Los Angeles               *
* ------------------------------------- *
*     TSgt 146 Aero Medical Evac Sqn    *
*     California Air National Guard     *
* ------------------------------------- *
*     Old West Lodge No. 813 F.& A.M.   *
*     Southern Calif Harley Riders Ass  *
*     AA6RV Amatuer Radio Call Sign     *
*                                       *
*****************************************


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (J.M. Kehoe III)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Motorola HT1000 "Service Software"
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 05:19:58 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Hi,
 I am in need of the "Service Software" and the appropriate cable that
will allow me to attach my HT1000 to my computer to change some
settings. thanks in advance for any help!   Jimmy


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:22:58 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mike Morris)
Subject: Re: Motorola HT1000 "Service Software"
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 05:39:26 GMT

[e-mail] (J.M. Kehoe III) writes:

>Hi,
> I am in need of the "Service Software" and the appropriate cable that
>will allow me to attach my HT1000 to my computer to change some
>settings. thanks in advance for any help!   Jimmy

This is a dealer item, and Moto is VERY nasty about bootleg copies
floating around.  Good Luck.
--
Mike Morris                                [e-mail]
#include <disclaimer.std.h>        I have others, but this works the best.
   This message assembled from 100% recycled electrons (and pixels).
   Looking for CDA-banned material?  Try the bible: Genesis 19:30-38


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:00 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: National HRO Wanted
Date: 27 Mar 1996 00:19:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4ja1j1$[e-mail]>

        Looking for an excellent to mint early model HRO. Will also consider any comp
onents that are
in excellent condition. Please e-mail. Dick Doremus, N1AJM


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (Rick Gulliver)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: NEED HEATH SB300/400 SCHEMATICS/MANUALS
Date: 26 Mar 1996 17:57:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9b6u$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rick Gulliver)


In my recent move to Hawaii my *OLD* Heath 's-line' manuals got lost.

I haven't had them operational for almost 15 years and they need a thorough
renovation. I also might need a source of some of the WEIRD tubes in these set
s
I do have some new 811's and 813's and a couple of 4cx250's to trade.

thanks
Rick N6JRH/K6AUA
<[e-mail]> or [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:02 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: need info on 51S1 variant
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 06:37:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4it761$[e-mail]>

I've  got a  51S1B (rack mount version) that was modified by LTV /
Temco Aerosystems Division. It has the designation G133F, runs on
110V, but the lights run on 28V.  Works ok, but the RX is not as hot
as it should be.  Can anyone tell me anything about this thing -- what
it went into, how it differs from the normal 51S1, how to get the RX
back up, what it's worth?

Jim KA3LLL



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:02 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl Hodder)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need info on NOVEX FC7100 for R7000
Date: 26 Mar 1996 21:29:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9njs$[e-mail]>

A few years ago EEB made an HF option for the Icom R-7000 called
the NOVEX - FC7100B. It let the R7000 cover from 20 Khz to 25 MHz.
The unit had a off/on/ttl switch, HF connector, V/UHF connector,
TTL connector and another connector with a RCA female jack.
Can someone tell me about this option, how to use it and
it's specifications. I called EEB about it and the said they
still sell it but don't have any information on it. Even
if someone had an owners, it manual would be just what I wanted.

Anyone else have this EEB option for the R7000?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:04 1996
From: Cliff Soderback <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need info on Tektronix 492 Spectrum Analyzer
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 19:19:08 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j11o8$[e-mail]>
To: Mike Suhar <[e-mail]>

Mike Suhar wrote:
>
> I have noticed Tektronix 492 Spectrum Analyzer advertised by several used
> equipment dealers.  I am looking for comments from those that have some
> experience with the 492.  The basic questions come to mind.  1.)  Are these
> still being serviced by Tektronix.  2.) Are parts available.  3.)  Do they h
ave
> any inherent flaws that would shorten their life and make them undesirable t
o
> own?  4.)  Are the options 01, 02, and 03 desirable?
>
> Any other comments would be appreciated.
>
> I have observed prices vary from $5K to $8.5K, some refurbished some not.
>
> Mike Suhar, WB8GXB
> [e-mail]

 I used the 492 Tek spectrun anlayzer. It is a excellent instrument.
I don't remember what the options did, but some went to about 40ghz,
others had tracking generators. Look in the back of the instruction book
it will tell. These sold for $18,000 to $20,000 new. Tek still
services them. Be sure to check the brightness on the CRT's before
you put down any money. They have an excellent service record and
were widley used in broadcast television, microwave and cable tv
systems. Tek does have a factory service department that will bring
them up to date and re-calibrate them. When they come back the look
and work like new.
                        Cliff, W7VVA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (wandal)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need information about the SIEMENS receiver
Date: 28 Mar 1996 21:14:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4jevg0$[e-mail]>

Has anyone out there ever tried the SIEMENS shortwave receiver?
The one which is retailed in Europe at about 500 DM.
Would like to know about its performances.



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Claude Frantz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need information about the SIEMENS receiver
Date: 29 Mar 96 09:29:14 GMT
Message-ID: <claude.828091754@bauv111>
References: <4jevg0$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (wandal) writes:

>Has anyone out there ever tried the SIEMENS shortwave receiver?

Siemens has manufactured many models of SW receivers.

>The one which is retailed in Europe at about 500 DM.

The model would be the prefered information. Perhaps you had
"l'affaire de siecle".

>Would like to know about its performances.

The performance of DM 500,-- ? Hmm... very limited today. :-(
--
Claude
([e-mail])
The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer
and not necessarily those of her employer.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:08 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Manual, Standard C288/188/488A
Message-ID: <1996Mar20.110517.1524@batman>
From: [e-mail] (Byron)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:04:35 GMT
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Byron)

Looking for a operators manual for Standard C288A portable. I understand
that 188A and 488A manual contain the same info. Please describe what
you have and the cost.
Thanks
Byron WB7ACJ



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (Anthony O. Cardenas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need Maxar50 Manual (UHF)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:07:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc3ot$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Chas,

Price that manual direct from Motorola:  1-800-422-4210.  Manual costs
vary...

Tony
WA6IGJ
_____________________snip___________________
"Charles A. Rubenstein" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I need to find a service manual for a Motorola Maxar50 UHF radio.
>Please respond to [e-mail] if you have one.
>Will gladly pay for copying or manual


>Thanks.

>Charlie





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:10 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: "Charles A. Rubenstein" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Need Maxar50 Manual (UHF)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 02:24:59 GMT

I need to find a service manual for a Motorola Maxar50 UHF radio.
Please respond to [e-mail] if you have one.
Will gladly pay for copying or manual


Thanks.

Charlie



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:11 1996
From: Hank <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Mods for FT-2500m
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:51:34 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Are there any mods for the FT-2500M?  There is a green jumper thats
visable by removing the top cover.  It looks a lot like the jumper that
one cuts to mod a ft-530.  Any ideas?


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:12 1996
From: Bob Ludlum <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need TS-820S Manual
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 19:19:24 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I need a copy of the SERVICE manual (not the owners manual) for the
Kenwood TS-820S HF Transceiver.

Bob K4LXA



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:12 1996
From: Bob Ludlum <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need TS820S Service Manual
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 21:49:35 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I'm Looking for a service manual (not the owners manual) for a Kenwood
TS-820S HF Transceiver. Please email if you can help.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:14 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Ni Cad Confusion.....Help Please.
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4itmep$[e-mail]> <4iv5if$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 03:18:07 GMT

I just want to say that this is all true true true, and well worth
reading again.

Gary


In article <4iv5if$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Paul Christofanelli)
 writes:
>You'll probably get lots of answers, but there goes...
>
>RICKCRIDER ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>: On a digital volt meter, fresh out of the charger, all three register in
>: the 8.35 volt range, a bit higher than the 7.2 volt label indicates.
>
>Extremely normal :-).  They've just been charged.
>
>: Used on the same HT,  all three packs are 'assumed' dead at different
>: voltages as follows:  (Assumed dead = HT beeps, throttles down, and shuts
>: off upon keying up.)
>
>: One battery pack:  Assumed dead at 6.32 volts.
>: One battery pack:      "            "     "  5.65  "
>: One battery pack:      "            "     "  6.95  "
>
>Is this the voltage at the battery pack terminals *when you key up*?
>I suspect this is just the voltage you measure after you've taken
>the battery off the radio and slapped a voltmeter on it, i.e., no-load
>conditions.  The radio probably shuts off based on the *loaded* voltage
>when you key up.  Internal resistance differences in the battery packs
>probably account for these apparent discrepancies.
>
>: 2.   Would it be wise....or not....  to rig up a device (bulb,
>:      circuit, etc,) to further drain the battery packs down before
>:      recharging.
>
>Not wise.  Running a nicd battery pack down to zero is bad, bad, bad.
>That'll kill it quickly.  An accepted safe value is 1 volt per cell --
>6 volts in the case of a 7.2 volt pack.
>
>: 3.  I have both a quick charger and an overnight charger.  Usually I
>:     alternate the packs between the chargers each time......is this a
>:     wise practice.
>
>The alternation idea is probably no problem.  I've read claims that slow
>charging promotes larger crystal growth (not good) so *proper* quick
>charging can be better.  I have no direct knowledge on this.  It is
>important to have a smart quick charger that detects when the battery is
>full by the negative delta-V method or equivalent.  Timed quick chargers
>are bad.  With good quick chargers, charging a partially depleted
>battery shouldn't be any problem, and is much better than artificially
>draining the battery to recharge it (probably a holdover idea from the
>old timed quick charger days).
>
>There are 3 main things you can do to ruin a nicd pack:  1) drain it
>down to zero volts, 2) severely overcharge it, e.g., leave it on a slow
>charger all of the time (nicd packs are designed to take some
>overcharging, though), and 3) leave it in a hot car for a long time.
>
>
>-Paul C.  KG0CZ


--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ni Cad Confusion.....Help Please.
Date: 22 Mar 1996 02:56:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4itmep$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)

Coudn't find a Ni Cad 'faq'.......and from all the newsgroups, this one
seems the most appropriate for the question.

SCENARIO:
Three identical HT ni-cad battery packs.   All same brand, and
approximately the same age,  all 7.2v, 700mA.

On a digital volt meter, fresh out of the charger, all three register in
the 8.35 volt range, a bit higher than the 7.2 volt label indicates.

Used on the same HT,  all three packs are 'assumed' dead at different
voltages as follows:  (Assumed dead = HT beeps, throttles down, and shuts
off upon keying up.)

One battery pack:  Assumed dead at 6.32 volts.
One battery pack:      "            "     "  5.65  "
One battery pack:      "            "     "  6.95  "

THREE QUESTIONS:
1.   Why would one pack shut the HT down at 6.95 volts, when another will
      operate it all the way down to 5.65 volts.

2.   Would it be wise....or not.... to rig up a device (bulb, circuit,
etc,) to further           drain the battery packs down before recharging.

3.   I have both a quick charger and an overnight charger.   Usually I
alternate             the packs between the chargers each time......is
this a wise practice.

I realize the Ni-Cad subject has run the gamut time and again, but any and
all help on this is truly appreciated.    Thanks.   73

Cordially:
Rick Crider
KD4FXA
Monroe NC
<[e-mail]>


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:17 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mike Morris)
Subject: Re: NMO GPS Antenna?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jafqh$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 08:36:58 GMT

[e-mail] (Kirk James Smith) writes:

>I'm thinking about adding GPS to my vehicle (a good compliment to all of the
>ham gear :-), but I'm a little disappointed at the availability of
>external antennas.  I got away from mag mounts long ago, and I'm not
>looking for some bulky clamp-on boat antenna either.

>I know GPS is being used by more and more companies for AVL, so I'm
>figuring someone must make an NMO version of a GPS antenna.  If not, then
>how about some kind of N-connector mount for the roof?

>Any sources for these items would be appreciated.  I checked out a couple
>of catalogs (Tessco, Larsen, etc) without success.

Diamond makes mobile antennas with N-connectors.
The local Diamond dealer sells a NMO ---> N adapter for them.

--
---
Mike Morris                                [e-mail]
#include <disclaimer.std.h>        I have others, but this works the best.
   This message assembled from 100% recycled electrons (and pixels).


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:18 1996
From: Edward Lawrence <eal>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: NMO GPS Antenna?
Date: 29 Mar 1996 16:52:29 GMT
Message-ID: <4jh4gd$[e-mail]>
References: <4jafqh$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

I have used a simple 1/4 wave whip with good results.  It is NOT as good as
the quad-filar (sp?) antenna that is supplied with the unit (GARMIN) but
does work.  I used it only as a test to see if the GARMIN antenna was
defective.

(It was, but I had accidentally subjected it to an excessive G load.  My
fault.)

The signal strengths were weaker on the bar graph, but were still usable.  As
I
remember it, the vertical was about 1 7/8 in. long.

All you purists can hit the "CANCEL" button on your learned flames.  I tried
it.
It worked.  It is not a better antenna than a patch antenna.  It is easy to
make.

I also want a good active patch antenna for my GARMIN GPS 90.  Where can I get
one?



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Zak)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Novatech DDS3 Synthesiser Board
Date: 26 Mar 1996 03:17:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7njq$[e-mail]>


G'day !  Any amateurs bought and used this board for experiments ?

I built a 'Techno Wizzy' DDS kit from the states a few years ago and it
was a nightmare.  Spurious garbage all over the place, with most spurii
only 5-10 dB down from the desired signal, I mean MASSIVE junk.

I'd like your comments and/or advice on this board because I'm
contemplating buying one.   Yeah, been to Novatech's web site and it
looks good, but there's nothing like getting the real drum on a device,
rather than the promo spiel (which is always rosy!)

Comments to [e-mail] please !

73
Zak VK6BMZ



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:23 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Periphex , W&W Assoc.
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 07:32:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4jaggc$[e-mail]>
References: <4hnsq1$[e-mail]> <4ho7nc$[e-mail]>

Likewise; I've had it happen too.

How about we all run off a thousand flyers and tape em up all over
Hara Arena on 5/18????

73

Ron




[e-mail] (Chris Weddle) wrote:

>Steve Dworkin <[e-mail]> writes:
>>>I (and I'm sure others) would like to hear about experiences regarding
>>>other HT battery suppliers (both good and bad), starting specifically
>>>with W&W Associates.
>>> Thanks,  Alan, WA6AQC
>>Alan:
>>I'm starting to think they are all the same.  I have a W&W battery
>>that I dropped off with them last week with the request that the
>>tech look at it and tell me what I was doing wrong that caused the
>>premature death of the battery pack.  They never called.  A week
>>later I called and was told that they left a message (first problem)
>>and that the answer was "Its over 2 years old and not under warranty."
>>I proceeded to explain that I wasn't looking for anything for free,
>>but rather some info so that I could buy another and not do the
>>same thing.  Answer: "Its not under warranty."
>>I followed up with a request that they split the case (so that
>>I could replace the bad cells).  They said "We can't do that."
>>Needless to say... My expereince is no better than the gent that
>>spoke about Periphex.  So be it.
>>Steve Dworkin, N2MDQ
>>[e-mail]

>While I've never requested W&W to do this particular service for me, I
>have had very good performance out of their products. Last purchase was
>8 months ago, oldest must be around 4 or 5 years. Expect to be buying
>several batteries from them shortly. Perhaps the difficulty was in
>making an unusual request that they are not set up to handle? Don't
>know, just guessing.

>Chris - N7RME


I too have had negative contacts with Periphex; the same problems....

W & W seems fine; I'm actually one of their dealers now; they are very
responsive, good quality stuff, fair prices.  Any problems, call them
and ask for Ronnie, she's the big boss there, should take care of your
needs.

Pardon the testimonial and 73...



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:24 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: PK232MBX FOR SALE
Date: 29 Mar 1996 09:05:35 -0500
Message-ID: <4jgqnf$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)

I am selling a PK-232MBX in great conditon!  This TNC has Packet, Morse
Code, Baudot, ASCII RTTY, WEFAX, NAVTEX, and AMTOR/SITOR will do PACTOR
with upgrade.  Also, has 2 ports can handle HF/VHF.  18k Mailbox inside
and plenty more....

Have manuals, cables from TNC to computer, cables made up for Kenwood
TS450 if you have this also have premade cable for Kenwood HT.  If you
have another radio I have plan cable for you to make your own cable for
your exact radio.  Might even have the box... will have to check though!

If interested I am selling it for $200 + shipping.

Email me at [e-mail]
For more info call me at [phone] Home
                                   [phone] Fax number

                        Thanks for your time and hope to hear from you
soon!
                                                    Jeffrey - N9MXT1


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:25 1996
From: BOYCRUZ <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: phl.media,rec.antiques.radio+phono,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Popular Commun Free Back Issues
Date: 30 Mar 1996 18:04:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjt41$hsq$[e-mail]>

I have around two dozen POPULAR COMMUNICATIONS magazines from the
late
1980s     years 1987  88 and 89 and have no use for them anymore
I would be willing to give these away individually or all together
if you want to pay postage
Contact me for further info!
Lots of articles on shortwave, dxing, radio stations   etc


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Lonnie)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: PRO-2035 HELP
Date: 24 Mar 1996 18:22:01 GMT
Message-ID: <4j43s9$[e-mail]>
References: <4j2rfj$[e-mail]>

There is no way of getting around storing the same frequency over and over
when your in the AUTO-store feature. The main difference between the 2035 and
the 2042 is the 2042 corrects the problem of storing the same frequency over
and over again.
There may be some other minor differences but this is the key one as far as
I'm concerned.

Lonnie


In article <4j2rfj$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
says...
>
>I posted about this before but got no replies but I have a
>PRO-2035 and the AUTO-store feature keeps storing the same
>frequency over and over instead of skipping it if it find it again.
>
>Am I doing something wrong or is this a problem? Is there away
>around it or some sort of fix for it besides buying a OS-535
>computer interface?
>
>Anyone know any secrets about this scanner?
>
>What is the difference between this 2035 and the 2042?
>



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:27 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gary Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Problem (?) with Heil microphone
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 13:32:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4j67k0$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I treated myself and My ICOM 729 to a Heil headset with boom mic using
>the HC-5 element.  ICOM uses electret condenser mikes that appear to have
>a pre-amp in the base while the Heil unit is a crystal unit that has no
>pre-amp.
>To get 100 watts out of my rig, I hav to run the mike gain WAY UP HIGH.
>Anyone got any tips?  I really like the headset as I do a lot of CW
>operating and the bom mic makes it handy but I am concerned at the high
>mike gain I'm running.
>Am thinking about building a small pre-amp to put between the Heil and
>the ICOM.
The preamp usually does the trick, also then you do not need to modify
your radio by changing the mic amplifier feedback resistor for more
gain.  E-Mail the nice guy at ICOM 's email address
[e-mail] and ask for the heil  mic preamp circuit.
ICOM has a little single ended amplifier circuit they send out as a
guide for heil mics, seems to work well.

Gary



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Problem (?) with Heil microphone
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 96 08:04:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4jdhi8$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j67k0$[e-mail]>

"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I treated myself and My ICOM 729 to a Heil headset with boom mic
>using the HC-5 element.  ICOM uses electret condenser mikes that
>appear to have a pre-amp in the base while the Heil unit is a crystal
>unit that has no pre-amp.

I agree with Gary; if it drives the rig and doesn't create a problem,
don't worry about it.

I'm curious about your description of this being a crystal element.
Heil rates these as having an output impedance of 2000 ohms. How is
that accomplished?  Do these have an internal step-down transformer?

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:29 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Problem (?) with Heil microphone
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 02:35:22 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
 writes:
>I treated myself and My ICOM 729 to a Heil headset with boom mic using
>the HC-5 element.  ICOM uses electret condenser mikes that appear to have
>a pre-amp in the base while the Heil unit is a crystal unit that has no
>pre-amp.
>To get 100 watts out of my rig, I hav to run the mike gain WAY UP HIGH.
>Anyone got any tips?  I really like the headset as I do a lot of CW
>operating and the bom mic makes it handy but I am concerned at the high
>mike gain I'm running.
>Am thinking about building a small pre-amp to put between the Heil and
>the ICOM.

Are you experiencing any problems with the high mic gain setting?
IE are you getting reports of bad audio? If not, it's working, so
why mess with it?

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:31 1996
From: Darryl Collins <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Problem with KENWOOD TH-28E
Date: 23 Mar 96 13:29:10 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] (Jonty Lawson) writes:
>
> Can anybody cast any light on a problem I have with a Kenwood TH-28E 2m set.
>
> I bought this to use here in France on 143.9875MHz, the frequency allocated
to
> sports hang and para gliders. The symptom is that the squelch sometimes open
s
> up even when set to minimum sensitivity. This occurs on certain specific
> frequencies separated by 1MHz (needless to say, 143.9875 is one of them).
>
> What seems to be happening is that the radio is picking up the radiations fr
om
> its internal clocks. If you put it inside a metal box the problem increases
> rather than goes away, suggesting that it is indeed the source of the emissi
on.
> Another 2m set held close to it also picks up on the same frequency.
>
> The distributer I bought it from has made it clear that I will have to sue h
im
> to get him to take it seriously. Kenwood in Paris have also indicated that t
hey
> don't give a damn.
>
> Does anyone here have any suggestions? Is it reasonable that a $500 RxTx sho
uld
> be unusable on certain frequencies? Is this a known problem with this model
or
> have I got a defective one.
>
> Anyone got any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>       Jonty



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:32 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Problem with KENWOOD TH-28E
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4iubq9$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 22:56:29 GMT

In article <4iubq9$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jonty
Lawson) writes:
>
>Can anybody cast any light on a problem I have with a Kenwood TH-28E 2m set.
>
>I bought this to use here in France on 143.9875MHz, the frequency allocated t
o
>sports hang and para gliders. The symptom is that the squelch sometimes opens
>up even when set to minimum sensitivity. This occurs on certain specific
>frequencies separated by 1MHz (needless to say, 143.9875 is one of them).
>
>What seems to be happening is that the radio is picking up the radiations fro
m
>its internal clocks. If you put it inside a metal box the problem increases
>rather than goes away, suggesting that it is indeed the source of the emissio
n.
>Another 2m set held close to it also picks up on the same frequency.
>
>The distributer I bought it from has made it clear that I will have to sue hi
m
>to get him to take it seriously. Kenwood in Paris have also indicated that th
ey
>don't give a damn.
>
>Does anyone here have any suggestions? Is it reasonable that a $500 RxTx shou
ld
>be unusable on certain frequencies? Is this a known problem with this model o
r
>have I got a defective one.
>
>Anyone got any thoughts?

Sounds like you've found a birdie. Most radios have them in one place
or another. I can understand Kenwood's reluctance since the frequency
where you experience the problem is outside the range for which the
radio is intended, IE outside the amateur band. Most manufacturers
won't warrant their products for uses outside the range within which
they were designed and marketed to perform.

I'd guess that the birdie is being generated as a harmonic of the
microprocessor clock. You might try a gimmick capacitor across that
crystal to shift its frequency slightly, and thus move the birdie
off your frequency.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:33 1996
From: Alan Johnson <[e-mail]@mail.mo.net>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Q:  Commercial gear on 6 meters & WTB: cavity/duplexer
Date: 29 Mar 1996 03:49:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4jfmku$[e-mail]>
References: <4j6bpt$[e-mail]>

I have converted a GE Master II to 6 meter service.  It is very easy to
convert and they are great rigs.  BTW listen for my 6 meter repeater on
53.35 (-1.7).  It is located 20 miles north of St. Louis and has only
been on the air for a week.  I am using a split site with a UHF link.

73
DE K9CTF

Alan

53.35
443.35



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paul Ferguson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: QRO HF-2000 Amplifier
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 13:36:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4j3j6o$[e-mail]>


I am interested in the QRO HF-2000 amplifier. Someone saw it at the
Charlotte hamfest and said it was very quiet (fan and QSK) and very
well-built. It is an instant-on amp using two 3-500C tubes. Price is
$1895 with vacuum relay QSK.

The specs list the output power as 800w RTTY, 1250w CW, and 1500w
SSB. Drive power: 130 watts for 1,500 watts.

I have seen a positive review of the amp in The DX Magazine by W1ZK.
The review mentions the quiet, 49 CFM, muffin fan. It quotes the
designer as saying the fan is sufficient for full-power SSB and 1200w
(80%) CW operation - you can place a low-speed muffin fan on top of
the amp to help draw out hot air if you anticipate higher levels of
operation.

Does anyone have  experience with this amp?
I am interested in comments from users and what output you get on
different bands with 100 watts drive.



Paul Ferguson
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (JCHol)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: QRO HF-2000 Amplifier
Date: 25 Mar 1996 20:30:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4j7hbk$[e-mail]>
References: <4j3j6o$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JCHol)

I really like mine.  It is very quiet which is a requirement for me.  It
is the quietest of any of 5 amplifiers I have owned.  I don't run it with
more than about 40 watts of drive = 800 to 1000 watts out.  I am a
conservative kind of guy.  It will run about 1300 out with 100watts.  It
is forgiving of error.  I make lots of mistakes, such as transmitting on
the wrong band, etc.

73 de John , WA5TWL


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dick Hughes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: radios and motorcycles
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:58:37 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4ip8u8$[e-mail]> <4j67ho$[e-mail]>

moore@  (Andrew M. Moore) wrote:

>In article <4ip8u8$[e-mail]>,
>Gary Hosler - KN0Z <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>[e-mail] (David Greene) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>
>>>I'm thinking about buying a ham handy talkie and using
>>>it on my motorcycle.  I know that Wingers and Harley touring types
>>>use CBs on there bikes and I'm wondering if a special
>...
>>>My bike is not a touring machine and only has a windshield,
>>>so there is probabaly going to be more wind noise on it.
>
>Dave:
>
>This sounds like a deadly combination.  I think you will face the same
>distractions with this combination we already face when talking on the
>radio in the car, which I think most of us can handle just fine.  The
>problem, though, is that like most other things on the motorcycle,
>everything is so much more critical and less forgiving (traction,
>skidding, riding over bumps, etc).  If you or someone else in traffic
>*happens* to screw up, the difference between avoiding a problem and
>being hurt/killed might simply require that extra bit of attention you
>had been giving to the radio (even just listening to a QSO).  I think
>it just comes down to a gamble.  Again, the same problems are present
>elsewhere (operating CW and voice in the car, etc), but the stakes
>are higher.  I tried riding my CB750 with an HT and an earphone for
>several days (receive only) just to listen to local police traffic,
>but I didn't feel comfortable with that, and I abandoned it only after
>a few days.
>
>Anyway, good luck with whatever you decide -- just use your common
>sense in either case.
>
>This winter has been too long.  I'm looking forward to taking the bike
>out of storage this week!
>
>-Drew

Check out the Motorcycling Amateur Radio Club MARC at
http://www.cuug.ab.ca:8001/~ve6hgw/marc/.  The members of MARC can get
you all the information you need.

Dick Hughes - W7LVA



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:38 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Rare Bug ??
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 08:56:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4j0ene$[e-mail]>

Was talking to a guy on 80m earlier who claims to have a bug I haven't
heard of before.  Actually, he just picked it up recently and
doesn't know much about it.  If you have info on this key, I'll pass
it along.

The bug is apparently very similar to a Vibroplex, almost a copy.
It was made by the Telegraph Apparatus Company in Chicago.  The guy
also picked up a second bug made by the same company, but he says it
looks more like a prototype of some sort than a production model.
I get the feeling the prototype either doesn't work very well or is
missing parts.

Any info will be appreciated.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dean Denter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Re: Rechargeable Battery Source?
Date: 26 Mar 1996 20:15:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9j8d$[e-mail]>
References: <4j98u5$[e-mail]>

In article <4j98u5$[e-mail]>,
        [e-mail] (John Hill) writes:
>Does anyone have a source for either Nickel Metal-Hydride or Lithium-Ion
>type cells? I am particularly interested in AA cells. It seems that none
>of the big HT battery pack dealers have any. Thanks in advance...John
>

Try the RC hobby suppliers/magazines, the battery distributors seem
to target the radio control guys more than hams.  I've been getting
most of my cells from Tower Hobbies (Sanyo Cadnica cells -- they also
have NiMH cells (with and without solder tabs)), they seem to have
better prices than the ham suppliers do (not an ad, just a satisfied
customer).

regards,
Dean.
--
Dean Denter               work -> [e-mail]
VA3CDD                    play -> [e-mail]
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[I speak only for myself]]]]]]]]]]]]]]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Hill)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Rechargeable Battery Source?
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 96 16:14:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4j98u5$[e-mail]>

Does anyone have a source for either Nickel Metal-Hydride or Lithium-Ion
type cells? I am particularly interested in AA cells. It seems that none
of the big HT battery pack dealers have any. Thanks in advance...John

John Hill NJ0M
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:41 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: Monty Wilson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Recommend receiver for young aspiring ham?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:24:24 GMT

Monty here in Houston.  My nephew in Dallas (age 10) wants to get his
license and I thought an HF communications receiver might allow
him to listen to enough HF to find out if he is interested in
getting licenses beyond tech, and if so, to copy some real CW
conversations as part of his practice.

I understand that these days there are many capable receivers
under $100 and that some of them can be found at superstores or
department store chains.

My requirements are:  Must be able to receive CW, SSB, and AM, must
have external antenna connection, and must have fine enough tuning
to separate ham conversations.

Any recommendations?

--
.........Monty.
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kwon2m)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Date: 24 Mar 1996 13:10:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4j4362$[e-mail]>
References: <4irjt9$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Kwon2m)


John Wagner wrote:
>
> Our club has an interesting problem with our 2 meter repeater's power
> amp.  I was wondering of anyone else has had this problem, or may see
> something we have overlooked.
>
> Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
> because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.
> >>additional test deleted<<<<<

As Tom, W8JI stated, a circulator may be the answer to your troubles. If
your repeater is located in a "high rf" area, ie a commercial tower, etc.,
there may be enough rf coming IN your antenna system to send your amp into
oscillation. A circulator (aka isolator) will send the incoming rf to a
dummy load and keep it away from the amp. It's also a great way to keep
signals from mixing in your equipment and producing imd products that
could cause interference to your system or someone else's. Many years ago
I had a similar experience when I ran a 2M repeater for a local club. If I
only knew then what I know now, it would have saved me untold hours of
repair work and frustration. Spend the money and get an isolator, it's
worth every penny.

John, N2BFJ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:44 1996
From: Cliff Soderback <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 19:43:56 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: John Wagner <[e-mail]>

John Wagner wrote:
>
> Our club has an interesting problem with our 2 meter repeater's power
> amp.  I was wondering of anyone else has had this problem, or may see
> something we have overlooked.
>
> Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
> because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.
>
> After an amp has been on-line for a month or two, it's output begins
> to fail and it begins to generate very hi power spurs and other
> broad-band components.  When the amp is disassembled, we always have
> found that the transistor tabs, solder, and any attached Z strips on
> one of the finals has been nearly destroyed by what appears to be
> arcing.  After the initial failure, any future failures always happen
> on the same transistor.  Our repairs have even included reconstucting
> the area with silver solder, but this only delays the failure an
> extra week or so.
>
> What we've tried (with no success):
> -----------------------------------
> We have viewed the output of our exiter on a spectrum analyser, and
> found it to be totally clean (at least on the bench).  Just in case,
> we have tried a second exciter, but got the same result.
>
> We have replaced the original TE Systems power amp with a Mirage
> (both rated for repeater service).  Same problem on the new amp.
>
> Converted the system from a dual antenna/BP cavity arrangement to a
> fully duplexed single antenna system with a TX/RX Systems duplexer.
>
> Replaced the system power supply with a surplus Lambda lab grade supply.
>
> Our (current) Equipment:
> ------------------------
> -Maggiore ~3 watt repeater exciter.
> -Mirage 4 watt in, 120 watt out power amp, typically run at 70 watts output.
> -TX/RX Systems 4 cavity duplexer, 2 years old, factory tuned to our frequenc
y.
> -Approx. 200' 7/8" 50 ohm hardline
> -Antenna Specialist 4 bay antenna SWR measured at the duplexer output
> was 1.7:1 (this antenna was replaced last week with a Cushcraft
> ARX-270 repeater antenna (new SWR od 1.4:1).  It is too early to tell
> if this will solve our problem.
>
> Any input is GREATLY appreciated!
> John, N8CID    [e-mail]

 John:
       The bypass relays are a real problem source with these
amps. They usually switch with each transmission and sometimes stick,
this leaves no load on the amp with full power. You can lock on the
relay, but the amp will draw about 2 amps on standby due to the
biasing of the transistors for SSB operation. A simple mode can
be made to remove the bias. I have used both of these amps and have
had both fail. Both manufacturers suffer from poor quality board
soldering. These amps are not good for more than 20% duty
cycle. Ham repeators need CCS(continous commercial service) rated
equipment, as they are on for hours at a time. Be sure to use an
isolater on the output of the Amp, this will protect the amp from
intermittant antennas, also will help intermod problems.
 I have used commercial quality amps with good reliabilty, but they
are not inexpensive.

                           Cliff, W7VVA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Mike Morris)
Subject: Re: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4irjt9$[e-mail]> <4j4362$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 08:28:50 GMT

[e-mail] (Kwon2m) writes:

>John Wagner wrote:
>>
>> Our club has an interesting problem with our 2 meter repeater's power
>> amp.  I was wondering of anyone else has had this problem, or may see
>> something we have overlooked.
>>
>> Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
>> because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.
>> >>additional test deleted<<<<<

>As Tom, W8JI stated, a circulator may be the answer to your troubles. If
>your repeater is located in a "high rf" area, ie a commercial tower, etc.,
>there may be enough rf coming IN your antenna system to send your amp into
>oscillation. A circulator (aka isolator) will send the incoming rf to a
>dummy load and keep it away from the amp. It's also a great way to keep
>signals from mixing in your equipment and producing imd products that
>could cause interference to your system or someone else's. Many years ago
>I had a similar experience when I ran a 2M repeater for a local club. If I
>only knew then what I know now, it would have saved me untold hours of
>repair work and frustration. Spend the money and get an isolator, it's
>worth every penny.

I second (third) the recommendation. I have seen enough RF coming down
a repeater antenna feedline to light a 25 watt light bulb. This can
cause a LOT of grief - not just in mixes, but also in repair costs...

--
---
Mike Morris                                [e-mail]
#include <disclaimer.std.h>        I have others, but this works the best.
   This message assembled from 100% recycled electrons (and pixels).


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:46 1996
From: eugene@ loop.com
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Recurring Repeater power amp problem???
Date: 27 Mar 1996 05:11:18 GMT
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4jailm$[e-mail]>
References: <4j4362$[e-mail]>

>   [e-mail] (Kwon2m) writes:
>
>  John Wagner wrote:
>  >
>  > Our club has an interesting problem with our 2 meter repeater's power
>  > amp.  I was wondering of anyone else has had this problem, or may see
>  > something we have overlooked.
>  >
>  > Over the past 3 years, we have had 2 different power amps fail
>  > because of what we believe to be parastitic problems.
>  > >>additional test deleted<<<<<
>
>  As Tom, W8JI stated, a circulator may be the answer to your troubles. If
>  your repeater is located in a "high rf" area, ie a commercial tower, etc.,
>  there may be enough rf coming IN your antenna system to send your amp into
>  oscillation. A circulator (aka isolator) will send the incoming rf to a
>  dummy load and keep it away from the amp. It's also a great way to keep
>  signals from mixing in your equipment and producing imd products that
>  could cause interference to your system or someone else's. Many years ago
>  I had a similar experience when I ran a 2M repeater for a local club. If I
>  only knew then what I know now, it would have saved me untold hours of
>  repair work and frustration. Spend the money and get an isolator, it's
>  worth every penny.
>
>  John, N2BFJ
>
>>>>
The cavities are a highly inductive load and my not present a solid 50 ohm loa
d to the amplifier. The circulator or isolator
presents a constant load to the tx.

Joe WB6HRO


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:47 1996
From: Mat Eshpeter <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Remote coax switches  -- any experience(s) ?
Date: 25 Mar 1996 20:20:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6v6g$[e-mail]>

I am thinking about buying one of the AEA
remote coax switches. Does anyone have
any experience with either AEA or other
manufacturers remote coax switches ?

I am referring to the switches that typically
mount on the tower, and have a control box
at the radio equipment site.

Thanks for any help.
Mat
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (JCHol)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Remote coax switches  -- any experience(s) ?
Date: 25 Mar 1996 20:38:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4j7hqk$[e-mail]>
References: <4j6v6g$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JCHol)

I am using the Ameritron 5 position switch - no problems after two years.

73 de John , WA5TWL


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Dorn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Results: Best Rig for SWL and Ham
Date: 27 Mar 1996 18:05:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc015$[e-mail]>

Hi,
  Thought I would post the feedback on the question regarding opinions on
rigs that perform well for SWL and Hamming. Concerns for SWL were
primarily focused around appropriate filtering for AM and RX audio
quality. The votes so far went to:
Kenwood TS870S - 3 Votes - Reasons: DSP and superior adjustable
filtering contributing to excellent selectivity and audio quality.
Ten Tec Paragon - 2 Votes - Apparently the shape factor on the standard
6KHz filter is quite good. Otherwise, not much more info shared.
Kenwood TS940S - 1 Vote - Excellent RX audio quality, and dependable
performance.
Yaesu FT900 -1 Vote - Good filtering and audio.
Japan Radio Company - 1 Vote - Enjoyable to listen to, although the 6KHz
filter's shape factor is a bit broad.
  I really appreciate all the comments and feedback. It looks like the
Kenwood product addresses some of the SWL concerns in the area of
filtering. I would be interested to hear some more about the Ten Tec
Paragon II. I know that the Omni 6 is a highly regarded rig, and wonder
if anyone out there uses a Paragon (I or II), and what their impressions
are. Once again thanks for the input.
Chris VE6RDC




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:50 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: RIG INTERFACE BY JBI
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:00:39 GMT

Has anyone tried the JBI interface advertised in QST for $29.95 which is
supposed to provide interface between your rig and pc? Software is
included too. Is the CV-1 adapter required?

--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:51 1996
From: Roland S Geter PhD <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: sale swap
Date: 24 Mar 1996 22:06:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4j4h1o$[e-mail]>
References: <4it1ed$[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

What is a Collins 75S transmitter?

Roland S Geter PhD
800-399-4383 x765 anytime



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:52 1996
From: Art Gunderson <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Seeking Power mobile antenna raise/lower mounting.
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 17:04:34 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4iv1mq$[e-mail]> <4j4fev$[e-mail]>

Brian Dunlap wrote:
>
> A friend of mine has mentioned that Motorola still does or used
> to manufacture a power Tx/Rx antenna for mobile installation!
>
> de Brian N9ROVHey Brian,
        I am assumming you are talking about a powered antenna as in
up-down retractable. If so a company named Stico will modify any powered
antenna to be a dual purpose Am-Fm and Vhf or Uhf antenna which is
functional and still goes up and down. They can be located at
716-662-2680. They usually require you to remove your existing antenna
and send it to them. They modify it and return it to you.. You will need
a splitter to connect the Am-Fm and the Vhf radios to the same coax. Ask
them about it.. good luck.    Art WB6VKR
--
                                                        73's  Art  WB6VKR


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (George McCrary)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Shoot, This thread is Frapped! What to do??
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 15:17:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4j3p3r$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4ijvsq$[e-mail]> <4ikqld$[e-mail]>

Guys and Girls!

         Get over this thread! It's finished, Done, Roasted, Cooked and really
BORING! It was obviously a post to get everyone riled up, and it
worked.  Why does eveyone play right into these guys hands?


                                                        73 DE KQ4QM (George)



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (John Rethorst)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Shoot, This thread is Frapped! What to do??
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 12:35:21 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4ijvsq$[e-mail]> <4ikqld$[e-mail]> <4j3p3r$[e-mail]>

In article <4j3p3r$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (George McCrary) wrote:

> Guys and Girls!
>
>          Get over this thread! It's finished, Done, Roasted, Cooked and real
ly
> BORING! It was obviously a post to get everyone riled up, and it
> worked.  Why does eveyone play right into these guys hands?
>
Good points. Thank you. The best thing to do with offensive posts is
simply ignore them.

John


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (BOBENGLUND)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SP430
Date: 26 Mar 1996 13:40:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4j9dn5$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BOBENGLUND)

I'm looking for a Kenwood SP430 speaker. Please contact me directly with
price and condition.
Bob

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:56 1996
From: [e-mail] (Betchy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Standard HT Batteries
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 07:42:36 -0400
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have 2 CNB163 7.2V 1000MAH batteries for the Standard C168A or 468A.
These have seen very little use 35.00 ea. or 65.00 for both, these are
shipped prices.

[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:57 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (David Feustel)
Subject: Standard's C5900DA: Opinions?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 14:45:55 GMT

I'm thinking about getting a triband mobile rig and the C5900DA
looks interesting (6 m, 2 m, 70 cm + packet to 9600 baud, cross band
repeat and remote control with HT). Does anyone have any experience
with and/or opinions of this radio?

How much does it cost?

Thanks.
--
[e-mail]
Dave Feustel N9MYI      For PGP Public Key, finger [e-mail]
Fort Wayne, IN          Or else access http://www.mixi.net/~feustel/
219-483-1857


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:58 1996
From: Ken Harrison <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Swan 600/ Heath Apache
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 15:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960326145717.17998A-100000@zippy>

I have a friend who has the Swan 600 twins and a Heathkit Apache
transmitter.  He is wondering what a fair asking price for these would
be.  They seem to be in pretty clean condition externally.  The Apache
worked when it was stored and the 600 twins *might* need a little work on
a selector switch.

He wants to sell locally but needs an idea of an asking price.

73,
Ken

__________________________________________________________________________
Ken Harrison   ---      [e-mail]      ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:23:59 1996
From: Geoff Brown <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tempo 2004
Date: 25 Mar 1996 20:50:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4j70uq$[e-mail]>
References: <4ilrk4$[e-mail]>

Sorry Tempo sold and antennas also gone.
Geoff




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:00 1996
From: "B.C. 'Jay' Jackson, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ten-Tec 1209 transverter kit: comments?
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 96 19:51:37 EST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

I have just started building the TenTec 6 meter to 2 meter
transverter.  I have over 25 years experience building Heathkits,
Knightkits, Eico, Ramsey etc.  (Last year I built a Heathkit HK-232
TNC that I bought at their "going out of business sale" and had saved
all these years.  It was easy by comparison.)  I can tell you this
about the TenTec kit.  Quality is good.  Instruction manual is
excellent in that it is very complete; however, if you are going to
build this you'd better know what the heck you are doing.  It
shouldn't be your first electronic kit.  They don't draw individual
pictures of the parts like Heath did.  You have to know or be able to
figure out what all parts are by their names, including a few unusual
ones.  You have to wind RF transformers.  You have to have access to
some test equipment.  You supply your own solder!  In short, I am
loving it.  I enjoy building things like this, and I have all of the
necessary tools, test equipment, etc. to do it right.

I will post when I get it done and let you know how it works.

BTW, I have already a TenTec 6 meter to 20 meter transverter, which
I bought from a friend who built it and wrote an excellent review
of it for a local club newsletter.  It works but seems somewhat noisy
on receive to me.  I bought the new kit for the fun of building it,
because I have a couple of 2 meter multi-mode rigs that have power
controls and a few 2 meter HT's, because I can't cut down the power on
my HF rig very well, because the new transvertor covers the whole 6
meter band, not just the lower 2 MHz.  One negative on the new kit is
that it doesn't have the bypass switch and extra M connector on the
back like the 20 meter version does.

AF4O

B.C. "Jay" Jackson, Jr. - Fairfax, VA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Occolowitz John)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Re: Ten-Tec 1209 transverter kit: comments?
Date: 30 Mar 1996 00:09:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4jhu3r$[e-mail]>
References: <4j8v9u$[e-mail]> <4jap1k$[e-mail]>

In article <4jap1k$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Parf) wrote:
>Hi Dean,
>While I have not built the TT kit I did hear a # of them on 6M last Es
>season- they were consistantly the nicest sounding sigs on the air.
>Previous postings here indicate the instructions hark back to the
>excellent days of Heath. Note also they now have a 2M to 6M downconverter
>to place your 2M all-mode on 6. I've been told the 1st run is sold out! I
>have no affiliation w/ TT in fact I don't own a TT!- but if I had serious
>interests in HF I would own nothing but TT.
>
>Dale WA2YPY

Ordered 1209 today, salesmam quoted 3 week delivery delay.

John KB9MIE


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:03 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Arlan R. Levitan)
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j20m7$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 15:00:03 GMT

>  In article <4id9m4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Bill
>  Brannick) wrote:
>
>  > Would like to get some opinions as to how this rig stacks up against
>  > the other radios in its price class.. like the FT-990 or the TS-850. I
>  > would kinda like to support an US made product, as long as to compares
>  > favorably with the competition.

I sold my cherry Kenwood TS-850SAT last October when a lightly used Omni VI
became available to me. Here's a list of some pros and cons compared to my
850, based on my experience to date.

Cons:

1. No built-in CW or voice recorder available (CW recorder was standard on
850, voice recorder was optional). Nice during contests. Of couse you can
automate using CT for CW and your Soundblaster for voice if you have a
computer.

2. Ham Bands Only - No general coverage (ho-hum) and CANNOT be modded for MARS

operation (my only big disapointment).

3. Cosmetic appearance is, well, very "different" than the slick rice boxes.
IMHO, looks like the product of an professional homebrewer on steroids. After
an awkward first month, I decided I love the look. Big, but surprisingly
light.

4. No built-in antenna tuner option (not really a problem, since the finals
are more forgiving than anything else I've used. The tuner in my Kenwood
850S/AT was a joke. I bought a used 2KW Dentron for when I need to tune
stepladders and rain gutters.

5. Audio quality of the Omni VI is good but I have never had anyone tell me I
had "great audio", which used to happen fairly frequently with the Kenwood and

same mikes. No "on-air" monitor function.

6. Menu system for system options requires a lot of key presses for some
frequently changed parameters. I like to use different tuning rates for CW and

 Phone...the tuning speed option is the very last in the menu. They should
have put a fast/slow button on the rig like the Paragon.

7. Have managed to lock up the rig two times in six months under computer
control, requiring a full system reset.

8. For my money, the built-in speaker is awful...distorts badly at high volume

levels (more than the Kenwood). Hooked it up to a $10 8 inch external speaker,

which eliminated the issue. The matching power supply/speaker has the same
tiny speaker in it. If you use cans most of the time, no big deal.


Pros:

1. Easier to operate than any other rig I have owned.

2. Best dynamic blocking factor I have ever experienced (awesome weak signal
performance).

3. Great service...I have called to ask some questions a few times and have
gotten a tech immediately each time...no irritating voice mail system either.
Very reasonable upgrade policies and the rig is laid out open enough that you
can actually work on it yourself if you are so inclined.

4. Built-in computer interface (compatible with Icom CI-V system). Since my
2-meter all-mode rig is an ICOM I can control both the Omni VI and my 275H
(plus 2 more ICI-V compatible rigs) with a single ICOM CT-17  interface. Way
cool!

4. Excellent filtering - I can count the times I've turned on my Timewave
DSP-59+ since I got the Omni on one hand.

5. American made - 'nuff said


In summary, best radio I've ever used. Won't even consider parting with it
unless they come out with an Omni VII some day, and even then it's only maybe.


Never had much luck at sweeps until I ran the Omni last November. Under so-so
conditions with a modest station (barefoot Omni, Cushcraft A3S at 35 feet) I
was one short (North Dakota - go figure) of a sweep with only moderate effort.

I credit the Omni's weak signal performance with much of that success.

If you're looking for a rig with more bells and whistles than a Mississippi
riverboat you can look elsewhere. I you want the best raw performance in an
amateur band radio for the buck buy a Ten Tec Omni VI and don't look back.

73s
Arlan KG8OW





From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:04 1996
From: "Gregory J. Buhyoff" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Date: 25 Mar 1996 12:48:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4j64mv$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j20m7$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Put simply, since the other fellows did a great job detailing the OMNI VI, it
is the
finest weak signal radio I have ever owned.  And, that includes the FT 1000, F
T 990,
TS 940, IC 765 and 17 others!  It is a pleasure to use and has the best ergono
mics
of any rig I have used.  Further, it is a joy to use on CW.  It is a hand's do
wn
winner.  I will not part with mine.

Greg KN4FR




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Don Mills)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Date: 23 Mar 1996 21:11:12 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4id9m4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

Bill,

Earlier I responded to your posting regarding the OMNI VI.  Unfortunately,
I didn't have my newsreader set up properly and I suspect you have no way
to determine where the message came from.  That should be fixed in this
message; my correct email address is: [e-mail]

Vy 73,
Don  K9DM


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:07 1996
From: [e-mail] (Clark Savage Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Date: 26 Mar 1996 13:08:40 -0800
Message-ID: <4j9mco$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j20m7$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4j8sjg$[e-mail]>

I replaced an IRCI equipped Kenwood TS 940S/AT with an OMNI VI a few
months ago.  I also was able to let go of my Drake twins soon after
the switch.  (silly, I know, but I needed the money, and the OMNI was the
R4C equal in everything I could see except out of band rejection.)
I made some comparisons before the move.  Here are some
of my basic feature comparisons:

Kenwood TS 940          *               Ten Tec OMNI VI

1.  Slope tuning wonderful      * PBT very sharp, not as versatile as slope
    for SSB

2.  IRCI filters great,         * Filter choices much better, quite as
    nar SSB and CW (400 Hz pair) * sharp as IRCI, more of them, cheaper

3.  Audio peak for CW great     * No audio peak filter, digital lowpass fair

4.  General coverage receive    * ham band only, no big problem

5.  built in AC only power supply * no built in supply, but runs on 12 vdc
                                    good for many purposes

6.  built in auto tuner         * no tuner, but good final section,
                                  I always use an external tuner anyway

7.  good RF processor on SSB            * audio processor, yuck

8.  VBT on cw                   * PBT with narrow filters equal to VBT

9.  3 level attenuator          * one level of attenuation

10. dual great noise blankers   * one noise blanker, good

11. Very heavy unit             * light, easy to move

12. stupid memory system        * very good memory and menu system

13. manual notch                * auto notch and manual notch, but
                                  auto notch distorts SSB audio

14. filters dep on mode         * filter choice indep of mode

15.                             * anx antenna switch (rcv) on front panel

16.                             * keyer built in, auto ID timer, better
                                  fast VOX for SSB, bandstacking registers
                                  and other more modern features included.

17. auto tuning rates for       * static tuning rate, but set from front
    band scanning from knob     * panel.  Can set very slow, for precise
                                  CW tuning with narrow filters

*****************

Now, in general, the receivers were comparable under most circumstances.
I am in an area where a local AM BCB station pushes the TS 940 meter
to full scale even with the 30 db attenuator on.  For 160 and 75 meters,
without an antenna tuner in line, the front end of the 940 crumbles.
The OMNI does maybe a bit better, but not a big difference.  I always
put a tuner in line to work 160 and 75.  (I use a nonresonant 450
foot horizontal loop 40 feet up, it loves to pick up AM BCB.  The only
receiver that can handle it is my Drake R4C.)

The Kenwood 940 has more pleasant sounding receive audio on SSB with
the pair of 2.7 KHz filters against the OMNI pair of 2.4's.  The Ten
Tec auto notch is useful, but I don't like its distortion.

In close in signal work, where big signals come up next to your weak
ones, the OMNI seems to do a lot better than the 940.  Not common
circumstances, and not a huge difference as far as I can tell, but
enough to notice.  Makes working stations much more pleasant under
heavy QRM.  You can REALLY TELL during a 160 meter contest in the
late evening, when the CW signals commonly come in with full scale
60 db over S9 ... and you want to hear a weak one next door.  You kick
in a 250 Hz filter behind a 500 Hz filter behind the standard 2.4 KHz
filter and tweak the PBT.  It is impressive.

BOTH rigs suffered from bad gain equalization with the CW filtering.
Switching in the narrowest of CW filters in either rig with a weak
signal can be tough since the filters have a lot of loss.  Ten Tec has
an extra IF amp you can use to make up for some of the loss, but it
does not cover all cases, as I have found (especially the pair of
250 Hz filters).  The Kenwood with IRCI 400 Hz filters suffers the
same.  Not a big deal to put in a little bit of extra gain yourself
in either rig though.

Overall, I still respect and love the 940.  I keep an IRCI equipped
Kenwood TS 440S/AT because I love the thing so much.  It keeps up
in 99 per cent of all situations.  However, the Ten Tec OMNI just
puts me over the top in good selectivity / filtering options and
the 12 vdc power source, which is important to me.  There are other
good things about it, but these were the critical factors to my choice.

Clark
.....................

Clark Savage Turner, Graduate Student Researcher
Software Engineering Testing
Department of Info. and Computer Science        1514 Verano Place
Irvine, CA. 92717                               Irvine, CA. 92715
[phone]                                  [phone]

WA3JPG, QRP #3526, active on HF, VHF and UHF.




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:08 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j20m7$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4j8sjg$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 21:38:17 GMT

Yes...and I called them today to order it and they said they were out of
500hz filters for another 7 to 10 days so I said I'll just wait.
Also, I asked if the Omni 7 was coming along soon and he said "NO WAY".
So it looks like it will be a while longer for the 6.


: >Mann....!!! That was good....pant, pant,....where's my checkbook?
: >Hmmmm. 30 day money back guarantee??? How can I loose?

: Yes, well said.  And if you're as happy as I am with the Omni VI, you
: won't be needing that 30 day money back guarentee.

: NV1B, CFO #963



--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:09 1996
From: moore@  (Andrew M. Moore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC Omni VI
Date: 26 Mar 1996 13:48:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4j8sjg$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j20m7$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

>: If you're looking for a rig with more bells and whistles than a Mississippi

>: riverboat you can look elsewhere. I you want the best raw performance in an

>: amateur band radio for the buck buy a Ten Tec Omni VI and don't look back.
>
>Mann....!!! That was good....pant, pant,....where's my checkbook?
>Hmmmm. 30 day money back guarantee??? How can I loose?

Yes, well said.  And if you're as happy as I am with the Omni VI, you
won't be needing that 30 day money back guarentee.

NV1B, CFO #963




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:10 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: TenTec NEWS
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 16:05:56 GMT

During a phone conversation with the T-T factory yesterday, I was told
that a new amplifier will be produced beginning around June of this year.
It will be rather simple with three 811's and cost in the mid 600 dollar
range.

--
Steve Ellington [e-mail]  Louisville, Ky


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dennis Ashworth)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Tentec Reflector
Date: 26 Mar 96 01:27:18 GMT
Message-ID: <9603260120.AA18322@adphdw20>

As there have been many threads lately about Tentec equipment, I thought it
might be useful for the masses to know of a reflector dedicated to Q&A about
Tentec equipment. If interested, send a message to:


[e-mail]

Leave the subject blank

In the text, type: subscribe <insert your address here>


After a few minutes, a message will return confirming your subscription.

As far as I know, the reflector is a private service, not connected in any
way to TenTec.

Enjoy,

Dennis, K7FL



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Don Mills)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tentec Reflector
Date: 28 Mar 1996 23:57:29 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <9603260120.AA18322@adphdw20>

Another option: point your handy web browser at:

   http://www.akorn.net/hamradio/tentec/


Vy 73,
Don  K9DM


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:15 1996
From: Marty Gulseth <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Timewave DSP-59+ EXPERIENCE?
Date: 23 Mar 1996 00:41:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4ivhb3$[e-mail]>

Hello All,

Anyone out there with a Timewave DSP 59+ (I think/hope that's the proper
model #)?  Comments, esp. re operation with HF digital modes?

TNX es 73 DE W7LEJ

Marty, Spokane, WA



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (Phil Sikes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Timewave DSP-59+ EXPERIENCE?
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:55:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4jai0f$[e-mail]>
References: <4ivhb3$[e-mail]>

Marty Gulseth <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hello All,

>Anyone out there with a Timewave DSP 59+ (I think/hope that's the proper
>model #)?  Comments, esp. re operation with HF digital modes?

>TNX es 73 DE W7LEJ

>Marty, Spokane, WA

Hi Marty, I have the DSP59+ and really enjoy using it. I don't do much
digital but it does a good job. It is very good on CW and helps quite
a bit on SSB also. I tried the MFJ 784B before buying this one and the
Timewave is much easier to use. I would buy it again!

73 de KJ7NS

Phil, Oak Harbor, WA



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:17 1996
From: BJR <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Timewave DSP-59+ EXPERIENCE?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:19:52 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ivhb3$[e-mail]> <4jai0f$[e-mail]>

Phil Sikes wrote:
>
> Marty Gulseth <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >Hello All,
>
> >Anyone out there with a Timewave DSP 59+ (I think/hope that's the proper
> >model #)?  Comments, esp. re operation with HF digital modes?
>
> >TNX es 73 DE W7LEJ
>
> >Marty, Spokane, WA
>


I have owned the DSP 59+ for about one month. I work the HF digital modes
almost exclusively and have found the DSP 59+ to be a great performer.
The RTTY re-modulator mode really works well. My KAM has a much easier
time de-modulating when the filter is in-line as all noise that is
outside the mark and space tone frequencies is eliminated. However, don't
expect any "magic" from the unit, there must be something there for it to
detect before it can filter anything.

73 de Bob VE6KRR


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:18 1996
From: Montbach/Bartlett <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: tk-340 uhf ht ot ft-40 fs
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:03:29 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I will be selling one of these fine radios. I have a tk-340d uhf 24 ch ht,
does hi/lo pl, dpl, scan, covers  430-475 reliably and is Keypad
Programmable. in nice condition, $225 shipped. I also have an ft-40 uhf
amateur ht, This Radio Does Real DPL! this is the 99 ch version. I like new
condition w/all accy's. $275 shipped. Email me at [e-mail] or call
617-491-2680 till 10 pm est. 73, Will, N1PXA


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ted Culin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TM-241, FT-2200, FT-2500, TM-251, FT-3000?
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:08:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6ueu$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (David A. Kay) wrote:

>     I am trying to decide on a 2 meter or 2/440 rig for the car.  The
>TM-241 and FT-2500 come in tops on QST intermod rejection, but have no
>DTMF dialing capability, which I use quite a lot.  The FT-2200, 3000 and
>the TM-251 have autodial capability.

>     If you have any of these, how like them and evaluate them for
>intermod rejection and ease of use for DTMF dialing?


>                                TNX,  de AB7FV,  Dave

I just went the 9 yards on this as well and chose the 2500M.  1) the
mil spec vibration/shock thing was important to me as this was going
in my 4x4.  The next important thing was intermod rejection, and 2500
is stiff.  Driving around with a dual band antenna through intermod
alley and not a chirp.  Same results with a 5/8's tuned 2 m antenna.

I almost went for the 2200 also ruled out the 3000 at $500 why not buy
a real dual band - 70 watts heck I don't even use 50 all that much.

I suggest that you make a table with the features you want on one
axis, and the radios on the other, check off the features in each
radio and the radio with the most checks wins.




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Kay)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TM-241, FT-2200, FT-2500, TM-251, FT-3000?
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 19:44:54 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j6ueu$[e-mail]>

In article <4j6ueu$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] wrote:

> [e-mail] (David A. Kay) wrote:
>
> >     I am trying to decide on a 2 meter or 2/440 rig for the car.  The
> >TM-241 and FT-2500 come in tops on QST intermod rejection, but have no
> >DTMF dialing capability, which I use quite a lot.  The FT-2200, 3000 and
> >the TM-251 have autodial capability.
>
> >     If you have any of these, how like them and evaluate them for
> >intermod rejection and ease of use for DTMF dialing?
>
>
> >                                TNX,  de AB7FV,  Dave
>
> I just went the 9 yards on this as well and chose the 2500M.  1) the
> mil spec vibration/shock thing was important to me as this was going
> in my 4x4.  The next important thing was intermod rejection, and 2500
> is stiff.  Driving around with a dual band antenna through intermod
> alley and not a chirp.  Same results with a 5/8's tuned 2 m antenna.
>
> I almost went for the 2200 also ruled out the 3000 at $500 why not buy
> a real dual band - 70 watts heck I don't even use 50 all that much.
>
> I suggest that you make a table with the features you want on one
> axis, and the radios on the other, check off the features in each
> radio and the radio with the most checks wins.




     Thanks, Ted.  I have done so and came up with the 3000.  It has the
same 2 meter receiver as the 2500 so should be very "chirpless" plus I
need the autdial memories.  Good choice on your part.  My brother did the
same.  And I just heard that the ICOM 2000 is not nearly as intermod free
as it is advertised to be.  Thanks for you help!

                     73's                    Dave


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Robyn Lyn Lempicki)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TM-241A display trouble???
Date: 25 Mar 1996 23:20:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4j79n4$[e-mail]>

Hi!  My 2m TM-241A started acting up this weekend after several yrs of good
service.  The display gets very erratic, lighting up most segments.  The
problem comes and goes...has anyone experienced this?  -Gerry



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (David A. Kay)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TM-241A display trouble???
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 19:40:01 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j79n4$[e-mail]>

In article <4j79n4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Robyn Lyn Lempicki) wrote:

> Hi!  My 2m TM-241A started acting up this weekend after several yrs of good
> service.  The display gets very erratic, lighting up most segments.  The
> problem comes and goes...has anyone experienced this?  -Gerry




     I don't own one but a ham on 2 mtrs told that the only problem he had
had was the LCDs doing something funny in very cold weather.  That's all I
have.

Good Luck!,    Dave


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:24 1996
From: John Passaneau <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TM-241A display trouble???
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:17:33 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4j79n4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

David A. Kay wrote:
>
> In article <4j79n4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> (Robyn Lyn Lempicki) wrote:
>
> > Hi!  My 2m TM-241A started acting up this weekend after several yrs of goo
d
> > service.  The display gets very erratic, lighting up most segments.  The
> > problem comes and goes...has anyone experienced this?  -Gerry
>
>      I don't own one but a ham on 2 mtrs told that the only problem he had
> had was the LCDs doing something funny in very cold weather.  That's all I
> have.
>
> Good Luck!,    Dave

Hi
I have a TM-241, It does have the "display problem" In cold weather
the display will some times show all the segments or just some of them
or none at all. As I operate mostly on one repeter its worth noting that
the radio works just fine even when the display is acting up as I don't
need to change frequency etc. I beleve the problem to be mechanical not
electrical as most times a good wack on the radio brings it back. I
will some day get into the radio and see if I can find the problem, but
interments are hard to find as they go away when you look at them.
--
  ***************************************************
  *            JOHN PASSANEAU, WB8EIY               *
  *   Penn State University, University Park, Pa.   *
  *    My opinions are my own, not my employers.    *
  ***************************************************


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:25 1996
From: cw <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trade 386SX-40 VGA System for 1.2GHz ATV transmitter or Dual Band mobile radio
Date: 24 Mar 1996 02:19:40 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2bfs$[e-mail]>

I would like to trade a 386SX-40 system that includes the following:


16Meg RAM
40Meg Hard disk drive
1.44Meg floppy
14" VGA monitor with VGA card
14.4 Kbaud internal data modem
Keyboard
Mouse with pad
Soundcard with speakers
Windows 3.11 installed

I am looking for a 1.2GHz ATV transmitter or dualband 2M/70cM mobile
radio.

Thank you.

John




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Carvalho)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TS-50 .vs. IC-706
Date: 25 Mar 1996 21:12:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7289$[e-mail]>


I am looking for a portable HF radio. I've got a chance to
purchase a used Kenwood TS-50(HF) with the optional CW filter.

I have also been looking at the Icom-706. I am new to amateur
radio and would like your opinion with regard to portable HF
transceivers.

Kenwood TS-750 (used) $700.US
Icom IC-706 (new)   ~$1200.US

Comments Pros/Cons are welcome.

--
--joe
My opinions are mine...All mine.
[e-mail]
Inter-National Research Institute
10101 Old Grove Rd. Sandy Ehgo, CA. 92131
For long you live
and high you fly
and smiles you give
and tears you cry
And all you touch
and all you see
is all your life will ever be...PF.DSotM




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:27 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Uhh.....one more Ni-Cad question......
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4itmll$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 02:32:04 GMT

In article <4itmll$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
writes:
>When refitting a dead ni-cad pack........would using 1000mA Nickel Metal
>Hydride batteries that I see at hamfests be better than the standard
>nickel cadmium types.......?

Be aware that NimH batteries need different charging techniques than
Nicads. Their self-discharge is worse too.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (Curt Phillips)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Uhh.....one more Ni-Cad question......
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 96 05:57:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4j2o8q$[e-mail]>
References: <4itmll$[e-mail]>

In article <4itmll$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER) wrote:
>When refitting a dead ni-cad pack........would using 1000mA Nickel Metal
>Hydride batteries that I see at hamfests be better than the standard
>nickel cadmium types.......?

  I purchased six of the Nickel Metal Hydride at the Charlotte hamfest
in 1995 and have used them for about a year in my Yupiteru MVT-7100
handheld scanner (500 Hz to 1.2 Gigahertz).  They have worked well in
it, but it's a receiver only.  Sometimes batteries behave less well
in the high current drain circumstances of a transmitting HT.

========= Opinions expressed are solely those of the author ============
Curt Phillips, KD4YU (ex-WB4LHI)      | "Computer users will need a
[e-mail]               | mouse when they grow a third
Chairman, Tarheel Scanner/SWL Group   | arm."  --President of Wordstar
ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh Am Radio Soc |                   circa 1983


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:29 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Tait)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Want info: Cubic Corp 1201 HF Tcvr
Date: 28 Mar 1996 12:45:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4je1kk$[e-mail]>

Hi,

Several years ago now I bought (cheaply) a HF transceiver which
was badged "AEL 1201".  The company AEL claimed to have no knowledge
of such a radio.  Recently I learned that the 1201 was actually
only distributed by AEL and then only for a short period.  It seems
the radio was built by Cubic Corporation (I think).  I would be
very grateful if anyone could supply me with contact details for
Cubic, or better still, let me know where I can get information
(just the schematic would be great) on this radio.  It has a
TTL based synth giving 12 channels and I would like enough info
to be able to homebrew a replacement synth/VFO.

Many thanks,

David
--
David Tait,                       Tel:   [phone]
Electrical Engineering Dept,      Fax:   [phone]
The University,                 Radio:   G0JVY
Manchester,  M13 9PL,  UK.     E-mail:   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (Geert Pirens)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted Receiver for 137 Mhz, or a KIT for homebrew!
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:11:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4ja11u$[e-mail]>

Hello all of you in this area.


Can someone help me with my problem?

I like to receive the next satellites: NOAA, METEOR. But for to
receive these sat's you must have a receiver at 137 Mhz.

Now I'm loking for some information where I can buy me sutch receiver.

A homebrew kitt wil also do !!

All information and reactions in case with my problem is WELKOM !!!!

Thanks already for those who will respons to my letter.

you can also send mail via FidoNet :  Geert Pirens  2:292/115.9

73!

Geert Pirens, ONL2057




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:31 1996
From: David Moss <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,aus.electronics,aus.radio.amateur.misc,sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Wanted Traegar SSB5 service manual
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 08:49:43 +1100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hello,

I'm looking for a circuit schematic or service manual for
a Traegar SSB5 'portable' HF SSB transceiver. This is a
product of the early 70's (based on the date codes of the
chips in it)

If anyone has any suggestions, please also copy me
on [e-mail], because I seem to lose frequent
news messages.

thanks


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (Zak)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED** YAESU FT80C Marine/Land Mobile HF Transceiver ** WANTED
Date: 26 Mar 1996 03:09:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7n5b$[e-mail]>

I need a couple of Yaesu FT80C all mode HF transceivers.

Anybody with ideas on a commercial provider of these radios
would be welcome to come on down and tell me where to get 'em,
either from the States or anywhere else in the world !

Please reply to [e-mail]

Regards,

Zak  VK6BMZ



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:34 1996
From: [e-mail] (Mike Aust)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: 21 Mar 96 15:24:25 GMT
Message-ID: <9603211524.AA27785@noldor>


Hey , I want something for free too, put me on the Santa's List.
I'll take a 5KW HF amplifier, FT1000, etc, you know , it's free.
Just ask, and Santa will deliver it to you. Is that how it work?
:-)  Gee, I wish I would of thought of this earlier, I could
have save $$$
73
Mike
W6TRW




Date: 20 Mar 1996 08:06:24 -0500
From: [e-mail] (Guy Teague)
Subject: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...

PhilRut1 ([e-mail]) wrote:
                   ^^^
: In article <4imk38$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
: (Jerry B. Altzman) writes:

: >Now, kindly crawl back under that bridge and go back to scaring villagers
: >passing overhead.
: >
: >

:  That's pretty crass from someone who's looking for something for nothing!
--------

Geez: haven't they got that newsreader at aol fixed yet? <g>
--
Regards  73 de  [e-mail]  "They're out there"              K Kesey
Guy      KG5VT  [e-mail]  "Hey don't eat that yellow snow" F Zappa

------------------------------


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Free HF Transceiver...
Date: 26 Mar 1996 14:17:54 GMT
Message-ID: <4j8uai$[e-mail]>
References: <9603211524.AA27785@noldor> <4iv9pv$[e-mail]>

Hear, hear!  What a great attitude this fellow has!  I, too,
have loaned gear to beginners and handicapped hams to help
get them started.

I agree that there were a lot of rude, insulting responses
to this poor guy's request.  It really does hurt to ask, I
suppose.  A lot of folks have a hard time when they are
first starting out.  That's no reason they can't try to
have a hobby as well.  And he wasn't asking for a FT-1000
or TS-950SDX, just some kind of rig.  I'll bet he'd have
been thrilled with an HW-101, Tempo One, or some other
old but workable rig, just to get on the air.  That's the
way I was back in my impoverished college days.  I had a
borrowed HW-101 that I was very pleased with.

Cut the guy some slack!

73 de KC5NG



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Werner Jochem)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: TenTec Filter Model 245
Date: 24 Mar 1996 21:15:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4j4e1p$[e-mail]>
To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

I'm looking for the Filter Model #245 (Audio filter for TT Triton I/II).
Kind offers to my E-Mail adress, because I'm not regularly reading this
newsgroup.
73 Joe  DK7VW          E-Mail:  jochem @ t-online.de
                       AX25:    DK7VW @ DB0SHG.#NDS.DEU.EU




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:36 1996
From: [e-mail] (Internet Swap)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Web Swap Shop
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 16:32:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4j1ciu$[e-mail]>

             Web Site listing Canadian Bargains updated DAILY.

Each and every one of your US dollars will today buy you about
$1.35 Canadian. We list more than 100 items of radio and computer
equipment for sale by Canadian Amateurs.

                        Point your browser to:

                http://www.entrepreneurs.net/dale/amp.htm



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:38 1996
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Weird Radio Problem
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 14:21:15 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> Isaac Kohn <ikohn@vertex.u
cls.uchicago.edu> writes:
>Michael J Wooding wrote:
>> In article <4idjm1$[e-mail]>, David Mark
>> <[e-mail]> writes
>> >What's happening is your radio is probably tuned to an FM station
>> >near the upper end of the band (around 107-108mhz) and you're
>> >probably under a flight path.  When a plane is nearby (there's
>> >that word again) and the pilot transmits on one of the lower
>> >airline frequencies, your radio's less than discriminating tuner
>> >picks it up.There is a small, minor detail: Air transmissions were AM, las
t time I
>checked!  How does an FM receiver with poor-selectivity receive AM
>transmissions???

Remember that the poor selectivity is in the receiver front end,
allowing the image signal into the receiver. This doesn't have
anything to do with IF selectivity. Now as to how an FM receiver
can demodulate AM, if the receiver uses a discriminator, it will
happily demodulate AM too unless the signal is strong enough to
have it's amplitude variations stripped off by the limiter stage.
If the receiver uses a ratio detector, it won't have a limiter
because a ratio detector is theoretically insensitive to AM
variations. But if the ratio detector isn't perfectly balanced,
it will still demodulate the AM signal too. So either of the
popular types of FM detector can demodulate AM under the right
conditions. One of those conditions is likely to exist in a
cheaply made FM receiver using a whip antenna.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (Collier Chun)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What do you need for a 2 meter repeater
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 07:07:23 PST
Message-ID: <4irrb9$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
says...
>[e-mail] (JA Glasscock) wrote:
>>Does any body know what I need for starting a repeater, equipment wise? I
>>want it to have an autopatch, and CTCSS tones to access it.
>You'll need a frequency-pair, which are pretty easy to
>get EXCEPT on the 2m band, in which case you'll have to apply to your local
>2m governing body and get on a waiting list.

Or you can set up your repeater linking two frequencies outside of the accepte
d repeater
subbands (established to prevent conflicts between repeaters and simplex opera
tors) on
what is used by local groups for emergency communications, intentially interfe
re with them,
then tell any simplex operators who come across it that the repeater's legal t
o the letter of the
law (legal, but not polite) and wonder why everyone suddenly no longer respect
s you--as a
ham or professionally.

Grrrrrrr............













From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:40 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: What HF rig should a newbie buy ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <4iupai$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 03:15:08 GMT

In article <4iupai$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jonathan M. Tallon) writ
es:
>Well, I've aquired my tech-plus license, and now I'm pinching my
>pennies to get a hf rig, & a 2m ht.  I've got all the catalogs, but
>sorting out the features & jumping back and forth between
>descriptions and price lists makes it nearly impossible to compare
>models --  which brings me to my question - what hf rig (new or used)
>will get the job done, cheaply.  Actually, I'd prefer to buy a used
>rig - it seems like new ones start over $1200, which is waaaaay too
>much for my budget.  Any advice would be GREATLY appreaciated.  Also,
>which 2m ht is the best for a newcomer ?

Let me suggest a few rigs to you. For HF, the IC-735 is still
a winner. It had the longest production run of any amateur
transceiver, which says a lot about its desirability. And
you can't have mine, which says even more. Street price for
a clean one is around $600.

For a 2m HT, new would be the Radio Shack HTX-202. It is about as
close to intermod free as new HTs get. When it's on sale, it's
pretty price competitive too. For a used HT, I'd recomend the old
workhorse Icom IC-2AT. It doesn't get much better than this short
of Motorola, and you can find them for around $100, a bit more with
accessories like the BC-35 and spare battery packs. No built in CTCSS
though, if you need that, look elsewhere. Another alternative HT is
the Yaesu FT-470. This is a dualbander, very simple to operate, and
you can find them for a bit under $200. More intermod than the
IC-2AT though.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bruce W. Martin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: What is a TS-711A?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 19:41:21 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have been looking at all mode VHF/UHF rigs lately. I have seen a couple
of TS-711A rigs for sale. I know that this is 2m all mode rig but would
like to know more. Power, Memories, Filters, Special features, is there a
special output to drive transverters, Vintage (when did it come on the
market and go off), comparable to what other rigs? What should I expect to
pay for one? Your assistance in finding out more is appreciated.

73 de KQ4TV
Bruce

--
*****************************************************************
* Bruce W. Martin          Internet: [e-mail]      *
* 4558 Brooke Valley Dr.   HAM Call: KQ4TV                      *
* Hermitage TN  37076-2650     ICBM/ALCM                        *
* Voice:     [phone]       Address:36░10'30"N/86░35'30"W *
* FAX/MODEM: [phone]          APRS:3610.50N/08635.50W    *
* URL:  http://www.tbr.state.tn.us/~martinbw/home.html          *
*    I have a 486DX33 to play games and run some HAM programs,  *
*        when I want to do serious work I use a Macintosh.      *
*****************************************************************


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:43 1996
From: AC6V <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What is a TS-711A?
Date: 27 Mar 1996 14:09:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4jbi7d$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

Hi Bruce, I own a TS-711A and use it as my base station radio. Modes are
A3J (SSB), F2, F3 (FM), A1 (CW). No AM like my old TS-700. Power in is
120V/240/220Vac and 12 to 16Vdc. Power out is continously variable from 2
Watts to 25 Watts.It is 15 lbs in weight. Dimensions W279 x H108 x D327mm.
Double Superhet design 30.265 Mhz 1st IF, 10.695 2nd IF for SSB/CW and 455
kHz - FM. Has DCS Digital Code Squelch, Dual 10 Hz digital VFO, 40 channel
memory, the offset and subtone (PL) can be memorized, has  Auto mode
select, Scan, RIT, IF Shift, Speech Processor, RF Attenuator. And a real
D'arsonval meter -- no LEDS.

Not sure of mfg dates I think I saw new ones in catalogs about 1990 or so.
Prices I have seen lately are from $600 to $750.

Options were VS1 Voice Synth and TU-5 Sub Audible Tone Encoder.Has ACC 1
and ACC2 rear connectors for com devices i.e., RTTY and computer interface
it sez. I use a TR-7800 for Packet not the TS-711A.

Hope this helps.Nice Rig for contesting on 2M and base station.
Accomodates my use of San Diego Repeaters very nicely as well as a some
SSB freq I use.

73
Rod
--
*****************************************************************
Hark! I Have Hurled My Words To The Far Reaches Of The Earth!
What King Of Old Could Do Thus ?  --- AC6V
*****************************************************************
A Man May Know Of The World Without Leaving The Shelter Of His
Own Home!
Loa-Tsze
*****************************************************************




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 19:35:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4iuvnq$[e-mail]>
References: <4ir7dv$[e-mail]> <4is98u$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:
>[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:

>>We cannot afford to trade with any country that does not observe the
>>same individual rights that we require within our own system.  To do
>>otherwise is economic suicide.

>Gosh, who can we trade with then? That rules out most of the world
>except Canada and some European countries.

That's exactly right.  Most of the world doesn't give a damn about
individual rights, and it's those countries that are shutting out
American workers.

Of course, if we were willing to lower the average wage to $0.25/hour,
pass laws against collective bargaining, and beat or kill workers who
don't perform, we could be pretty competitive.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:45 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: 20 Mar 1996 23:40:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4iqmjk$[e-mail]>
References: <4iq0hd$[e-mail]>

In article <4iq0hd$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Curt
Phillips) writes:

>  Imagine if they go democratic/free enterprise.
>Japan times 1.2 or so BILLION people.  But they WILL be a big
>market :-).
>
>

Right, just like Japan and Mexico is!


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WHOLESALE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS from China
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 96 20:31:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4j7063$[e-mail]>
References: <4idpfr$[e-mail]> <4ij6du$[e-mail]> <4iq0hd$[e-mail]> <4ir7dv$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (David Feustel) wrote:

>Don't Worry. The U.S. will be a totalitarian society by the year
>2000.

I know of no basic individual rights, including those described in the
Constitution, that are not already subject to government control.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (Donald Theriault)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB KENWOOD PROGRAMER
Date: 26 Mar 1996 20:57:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4j9lo7$[e-mail]>

LOOKING FOR A KENWOOD PROGRAMER FOR THE 701/801/720/820 SERIES RADIOS

WILL PAY CASH

PLEASE E-MAIL ME OR CALL 619-425-9659
DONALD


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bmoore 2nd)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB:  antique, tube type, Pilot Brand radios
Date: 24 Mar 1996 23:25:58 -0500
Message-ID: <4j578m$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Bmoore 2nd)

Hello

I am a private collector willing to pay a very high price for Pilot radios
that were produced on the east coast and in England.   I can pay finders
fees and locators fees for these radios if you know of any.  They can be
in any condition, I can restore them.  In addition, I am looking for any
related item, Pilot tubes and literature.   Shipping from anywhere no
problem.  Thanks

Please contact me at  [e-mail] or 205-880-1207

Bill


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:49 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB:  HF Rig
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 96 19:21:41 PDT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>


Looking for a reasonably priced HF rig.  Prefer solid state but would consider

hybrid if price is right and tubes are reasonably new.  E Mail direct.
Thanks & 73's
Jim/KF4ALV



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (D W Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB:  TU-6 tone board for Kenwood TH-21/31/41 series
Date: 22 Mar 1996 20:19:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4iv20q$[e-mail]>

I'd like to buy a TU-6 tone board to install in my
ancient TH-21AT handheld.  I would also consider
buying a TH-21BT basket case for parts, and adding
the necessary tones that way.

In addition, I need the manual for a BC-6 charger.

Thanks and 73 de KC5NG, Dean Hemphill



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:50 1996
From: Bill Kirk <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: 2m/70cm Mobile xcvr
Date: 19 Mar 1996 18:23:34 GMT
Message-ID: <4imu36$[e-mail]>

I am interested in an ICOM or Kenwood dual band mobile transceiver in
good+ condx.  Please respond direct to my email address with all
pertinent info, including model number, condx, estimated S&H charges
and price.

Thanx,

Bill  W6RQQ
San Diego



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:51 1996
From: [e-mail] (CB Gazette)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: ADONIS Microphone
Date: 21 Mar 1996 10:25:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4irscp$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (CB Gazette)

AR-7500. (just like the Icom SM-10, but nicer looking)...But, I wouldn't
pass up
a good deal on an SM-10 either!
Brian
KB5CEJ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:52 1996
From: Linn Boyd <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: DJ-580-
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:12:19 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I am looking for a good Alinco DJ-580.

Thanks,
Linn Boyd
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:53 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dale Kight)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Drake VFO 2NT-VFO ??
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:09:04
Message-ID: <4j4rlu$[e-mail]>

Wanted: VFO that matches Drake 2NT xmtr
******************************************************************************
******
Dale Kight   NH6VR    3231 NW 50th St. #232 Oklahoma City, Ok. 73112
E-mail:  [e-mail]     Phone  [phone]    Pager 405-781-8292

Looking for:
     1.   Hallicrafters SX-140 Rcvr
     2.   Lafayette HE-30 Rcvr
******************************************************************************
******



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:54 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bob Applegate)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: IC-202
Date: 27 Mar 1996 15:34:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4jbn68$[e-mail]>

Does anyone have an old Icom IC-202 rig that they want to
sell?  I'd prefer a working one with manual, but let me know
what you have and the price.

73
Bob


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dale Kight)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: National NC-270
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 16:25:02
Message-ID: <4jcf5u$[e-mail]>

Looking for a NATIONAL NC-270 Rcvr.
******************************************************************************
******
Dale Kight   NH6VR    3231 NW 50th St. #232 Oklahoma City, Ok. 73112
E-mail:  [e-mail]     Phone  [phone]    Pager 405-781-8292

Looking for:
     1.   Hallicrafters SX-140 Rcvr
     2.   Lafayette HE-30 Rcvr
******************************************************************************
******



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:55 1996
From: [e-mail] (Charles Lowery)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Yaesu FT726R modules
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 21:28:20 GMT
Message-ID: <4jf10j$[e-mail]>

I need all the modules available for a Yaesu FT 726R Radio I only have
the two meter module..



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:56 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB; inexpensive setup for ham(newbie)disabled person now
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 08:40:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4javcm$[e-mail]>

I need to learn and need equipment

Want to talk globally and do local S&R and talk with the man that
saved my life in Alaska(he has only ham for communications).

I will joining a club in my local area when   if?  I get mobile

There are many repeaters in my area I believe(Seattle area)

I would like to spend 500$ or less for working equipment?

If you have some or can help please let me know.I am starting to study
code and already no some from being a commercial fisherman in AK.
Also I understand I am entitled to some sort of doctors waiver to get
the license.

                            thank you a bunch!!   D.Davy Earl



From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:57 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bob Levine)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu "mil-spec" NOT
Date: 27 Mar 1996 18:15:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4jc0k5$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]


In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (
David A. Kay) writes:
-->  Hello, all.  After a number of conversations with Yaesu I have
-->learned the following:
-->
-->1.  Both of these rigs are Mil Spec

I've wondered about this.  Knowing how demanding mil (883-B for example)
specs are, I doubt that any of the Yeasu radios are "mil-spec".

Mil spec requires specially screened semiconductos (plastic pkgs
are not allowed) etc.  How can Yeasu claim mil-spec on cheapo
(relatively speaking dollar wise compared to mil-spec) radios?



--
/*****************************************************************
 *      Bob Levine                                               *
 *      Manager of Application Engineering                       *
 *      Mercury Computer Systems             KD1GG/VK2GYN/7J1AIS *
 *****************************************************************/




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paul Christofanelli)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: YAESU FT-8500, FT-3000M
Date: 25 Mar 1996 18:43:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4j6phc$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

David,

I have an FT-8500...

David A. Kay ([e-mail]) wrote:
: RE:  The FT-8500 and the FT-3000M

: 1.  How is intermod resistance?

  So far, so good.  In VHF + VHF mode, the "non-native" VHF side seems
  slightly more prone to "intermod".  Not too bad, though.  The manual
  warns of this.  In V+U mode, no problems at all.

: 2.  How easy/hard is the auto dial to use?

  I assume you mean auto dial DTMF.  It's easy to program and to use,
  but it's NOT easy to switch between autodial and no autodial on the
  fly and especially while driving; you have to go through the menus.

: 4.  How much and what can you control the rig from the MH-39 , MH-36 mike?

  I don't have the MH-39, but it looks well layed out.  It does have one
  rotary knob that's multiplexed between VHF/UHF/volume/squelch.  Once
  you get used to the FS-10 mic (the other one), lots of stuff can be
  easily controlled from the mic.  The FS-10 is not for everyone, though.

:  5.  Overall, how would you rate the rig?

  The FT-8500 seems to have solid radio performance.  If you like lots
  of features, it's great.  It may be overkill for some people, though.


-Paul C.  KG0CZ


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:24:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (Paul Christofanelli)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: YAESU FT-8500, FT-3000M
Date: 28 Mar 1996 23:45:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4jf8ad$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4j6phc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

David A. Kay ([e-mail]) wrote:

:      Just a question about the above mentioned switch - what do you mean
: by switching . . . ?  I am used to using autodial if I select it and then
: using the kepyad to dial directly, if needed.  Are you saying that you
: have to go into menus to to reset settings to do this?

I replied to Dave directly, but for anyone else who's interested:
Yes, you have to go through the menus (a minimum of 6 or so key presses
if you remember the menu code for autodial) to turn on or off autodial.
You can't send individual DTMF tones if autodial is on.  This brings
up the idea of being able to directly access autodial when in non-autodial
mode by, say, hitting the ENT key before hitting the number key.  Too
bad they didn't do something like this...

-Paul C.


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:25:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (mkeitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu HT Nicad dissasembly
Date: 28 Mar 1996 22:23:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4jf3gi$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Steve Mason) says:
>
>Hi all.
>I have a bad Nicad pack from an FT-530.  If I remember correctly, tha last
>time I tried to dissassemble a Yaesu pack from a 470, it was extremely
>difficult.
>Does anyone have any tips?
>I was thinking of using a heat gun to soften the glue...
>
Most likely, there is no "glue" per se, it is "welded" together with
a solvent which softens the plastic and allows the two parts to merge
together.  Then the solvent evaporates and the plastic re-hardens.  So
using a heat gun would cause serious melting of the plastic case before
any weakening of the joint would occur, since the joint and the rest of
the case are made from the same material.

Usually the welded part is quite a bit weaker than the virgin plastic,
so tapping or pounding on the seam with not quite enough force to break
the case may work.  Once one side opens up, some prying may be indicated.
If it doesn't want to crack at all, take a razor blade or jeweler's saw
and cut along the seam; plan on using lots of glue to put it back
together.  Since the "welding" process is theoretically supposed to make
the two pieces into one, making it back into two cleanly is difficult.

My experience is with Standard packs, not Yaesu ones, so I may be
completely off base here.  For example, make sure there are no screws
hidden under the labels, etc. before you assume it is indeed held
together with glue.

-Mike KD4QDM




From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:25:01 1996
From: [e-mail] (Steve Mason)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu HT Nicad dissasembly
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 19:56:12 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi all.
I have a bad Nicad pack from an FT-530.  If I remember correctly, tha last
time I tried to dissassemble a Yaesu pack from a 470, it was extremely
difficult.
Does anyone have any tips?
I was thinking of using a heat gun to soften the glue...

Thanks,

Steve


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:25:02 1996
From: acsrds%/etc/HOSTNAME (Robert Schulz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu HT Nicad dissasembly
Date: 29 Mar 1996 02:40:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4jfij1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

Having recently done this same thing (disassembled a FT530 pack), here
are some pointers:

1) remove the little label on top.  There is a snap tab underneath.  The
case opens as a clamshell from the top.  Do not try to pry it open from
the bottom.

2) I didn't have any problems getting the seams apart - the primary
method of keeping the pack shut is glue applied to the ends of the nicad
cells inside.  Basically, all that is required is enough carefully
applied force.

3) I tried the "freeze it overnight" method to make the glue more brittle
- it didn't seem to help much if at all, but it is worth trying.


Robert Schulz KC6UDS
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sat Mar 30 14:25:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (David Nishikawa)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu HT Nicad dissasembly
Date: 29 Mar 1996 15:09:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4jgufl$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

I've done 2-3 of the 530 packs and I've had good luck by spreadin the top
of the pack using a spreading tool against the mounting rails. Gentle
pressure should eventually force the two halves apart.

Steve Mason ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Hi all.
: I have a bad Nicad pack from an FT-530.  If I remember correctly, tha last
: time I tried to dissassemble a Yaesu pack from a 470, it was extremely
: difficult.
: Does anyone have any tips?
: I was thinking of using a heat gun to soften the glue...

: Thanks,

: Steve

--
Dave Nishikawa KC6YFG
[e-mail]
CIS: 72465,641


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dave Parlette)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-102 Manual
Date: 26 Mar 1996 11:56:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4j8m12$[e-mail]>

Thanks for reading. I need a shop manual for the Yeasu FT-102.
Hope you can help me.
Thanks...............Dave
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:04 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu "mil-spec" NOT
Date: 27 Mar 1996 21:11:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4jcaui$[e-mail]>
References: <4jc0k5$[e-mail]>

Bob,

You've infered too much from the term "mil-spec".  There are *MANY* different
"mil-specs", and the Yaesu rigs DO meet Military Standard 810C Specifications
MIL-STD-810C Vibration and MIL-STD-810C Shock.  Whether or not they meet
the spec you reference, they DO meet the specs quoted by the sales literature.

I own several of their rigs that are "mil-spec", and in my experience they are
 built
better than their non "mil-spec" brethern from any manufacturer including Yaes
u.

Bill Young
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Radiomatt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ARRL insurance
Date: 28 Mar 1996 01:44:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4jdcgn$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Radiomatt)

I had the insurance from time to time; three or four years, then off for a
couple, and then back on again. Last winter a water pipe froze and burst
inundating my radios. The tube stuff stood up fairly well, but my prize
pair of HRO-500 and matching HRO-600 got pretty much destroyed. The 500 is
still fixable, so I did not ask for replacement (or $), but the 600 is
REAL rare; I had it appraised; they said it was a total loss, and the
Wohlers Company made good for $2500.
(The pair, in one cabinet, had been insured at $3100, out of total insured
ham shack of about $11K).
No complaints here. They handled the claim professionally and rapidly once
the appraisal came in --that took 4 mos, but not their problem.
Go for it


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:06 1996
From: Greg Snellgrove <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Opinions of RS HTX-212 Wanted
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 23:40:11 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Would anyone who owns a Radio Shack HTX-212 mobile 2 meter rig care to
share their experiences with the rig? I would greatly appreciate it!

73, Greg
KN4NO


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:07 1996
From: [e-mail](Rob Peebles)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: AEA's Doctor DX Cartridge: Anyway to run on a PC?
Date: 29 Mar 1996 02:22:10 GMT
Message-ID: <4jfhgi$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail]
(John Becker) writes:
>
>I have pretty much retired all my C-64 stuff, but I used to really
>enjoy using the Doctor DX cartridge. I'm wondering if there is anyway
>to run this on a PC?
>

There is a free program on the sharware CD ROMs that is better than
Doctor DX, especially if you have a sound card.  It is called PED and
it does a pretty impressive job of simulating pileups.  I know the
program is on the QRZ disc,  and might even be in the archive on their
web page (http://www.qrz.com).

--
Rob Peebles, WD8LXX
Dublin, Ohio



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:08 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 1996 08:55:09 GMT
Message-ID: <4jg8hd$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]> <4jfpu7$[e-mail]>

Gary - KJ6Q ([e-mail]) wrote:
: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras) wrote:
:
: >Nate.
: >
: >
: >Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
: >you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
: >worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded.
: >
: >
: *I*, for one, want to emphatically *THANK* you for your decision to avoid
: HF, and even more so for taking those like you with you. The few sour
: apples like you we have already are QUITE enough, thank you.
:
: Just don't leave thinking you will be missed....and please close the door
: behind you.                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ^^^^^^^^^^



        You can't close what's never been opened! I think the door, in this
        post is a metaphor for the mind of the person who wrote it! You wan't
        all of us No-Code losers to stay away from your precious spectrum, so
        that we will not polute it with free thinking!


        Good Tactic.



        Nate.





From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:09 1996
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: re: Palomar amp question?
Date: 29 Mar 1996 10:50:05 -0500
Message-ID: <4jh0rd$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)

In article <4je6rg$ib4$[e-mail]>, George Harris
<[e-mail]> writes:
>Tom,
>Thanks for your response but I believe you are incorrect. The amp
>has a Band Switch that goes from 10m to 80m and I've checked the
>output into a dummy load with my scope. The output frequency
>checks out properly although I haven't checked the signal with a
>spectrum analyser so I don't know how clean it is yet.
>Have a good day sir.
>
>73's

Hi George,

The problem isn't the lack of a band switch, the problem is in the amps
(lack of) biasing and the basic circuit design. IMD problems will not show
up on a scope, and show up only on a spectrum analyzer if the amplifier is
operated with a two carrier test.

Most Palomars wouldn't operate outside the upper end of the HF spectrum.
They only worked near the CB band (because the RF chokes were too small).


All of the Palomars I'm aware of won't be clean for SSB or AM linear
operation. Palomar intentionally used a bias circuit (in some amps) that
promoted positive carrier shift (forward modulation in CB talk).

Even if the model you have has the grids all grounded, two sweep tubes
driving four is real nasty for IMD (unless the model you have happens to
have all six tubes in parallel, then it's just dirty)!

I know it may not be what you want to hear, but the truth is amp you have
was designed to be a CB amp. The bandswitch was a "clever" way to get
around FCC rules. Palomar sold those models right before the "final FCC
bust" that put them out of the illegal CB amp business permanently. They
were never marketed to Hams, just CB'ers.

73, Tom


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:10 1996
From: Jared Cassidy <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Yaesu FL2100B Amplifier
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:02:25 -0600
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Looking for a Yaesu FL2100B amplifier in good condition.

Please E-mail price and condition to Bob Alper at [e-mail]

or call 1-800-578-3852

Thanks!

73,

Jared Cassidy, KQ4VT
E-mail: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:11 1996
From: Jared Cassidy <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: ITT Radio Engineers Handbook
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:04:32 -0600
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Looking for an ITT Radio Engineers Handbook.

Pleae E-mail price and condition to Bob Alper at [e-mail]

or call 1-800-578-3852.

Thanks!

73,

Jared Cassidy, KQ4VT
E-mail: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:12 1996
From: Keith Hester <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB: kenwood dsp-100
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 12:44:03 -0600
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jfdrp$[e-mail]>
To: Carlos Ramirez <[e-mail]>

Carlos Ramirez wrote:
>
> I am looking for this unit for my TS-450. State price and condition, only
> reasonable offers would be answered.
> 73's
> Carlos

----------
Hi Carlos:

   You will probably elicit responses from those wishing to sell their DSP-100
s... but
if you wish a new one, AES in Milwaukee was offering them at a very good close
-out price
a few months back.  It would be worth placing a call to them to see if any rem
ain.

Regards,
Keith (KS9C)


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:13 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dana Rodakis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 96 14:36:33 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Nathan,

I figured you must be a NO-CODE LID!  Only your mentality
would bash the HF spectrum.  Stay on 2 meters or better yet,
channel 19, where you belong.  I'll bet you use the words
"break", "destinated", "come on back" and every Q-signal in the
list on the local 2-meter repeater, even though Q-signals are
CW (morse code!) abbreviations.  And before you start bashing
code as an useless out-of-date mode of communication, I have had
many wonderful conversations with stations everywhere using code,
while driving down the interstate.

So, if you don't like HF, then STAY THE HELL OUT so that we who
enjoy all aspects of amateur radio, especially HF can enjoy it.

I'll bet you give your callsign and add "for ID".

73 to everyone else
Dana, AJ1R





From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:14 1996
From: [e-mail] (Donald W. Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu 767GX 6 meter module wanted
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 16:34:50 GMT
Message-ID: <4jh37g$[e-mail]>

I have a friend who is looking for the 6 meter module (FEX-767-6) for
his rig.  He does not have Internet access, but you may reach him by
phone:

Fred K5KNL
[phone]

or reply by e-mail to me:
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 1996 17:36:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4jh731$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>


Good day, humans:

Read this response, and you will understand fully the Hardcore HF
persona.


Dana Rodakis ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Nathan,
:
: I figured you must be a NO-CODE LID!  Only your mentality
: would bash the HF spectrum.  Stay on 2 meters or better yet,
: channel 19, where you belong.  I'll bet you use the words
: "break", "destinated", "come on back" and every Q-signal in the
: list on the local 2-meter repeater, even though Q-signals are
: CW (morse code!) abbreviations.  And before you start bashing

I only talk simplex, and the people I talk to are more interesting, and
more civilized than most people on 80m phone.

n8

: code as an useless out-of-date mode of communication, I have had

I am glad you like code, but this is a democratic society.... If the
majority would prefer to get rid of code, it should happen with the
quickness.


n8

: many wonderful conversations with stations everywhere using code,
: while driving down the interstate.
:
: So, if you don't like HF, then STAY THE HELL OUT so that we who
: enjoy all aspects of amateur radio, especially HF can enjoy it.
:

Just keep following the watch, Dana, You're getting sleepy.


: I'll bet you give your callsign and add "for ID".
: : 73 to everyone else
: Dana, AJ1R
:
:
:


Code IS out of date, that's not to say there's anything wrong with it. In
fact HF would probably be 1/2 as bad if everyone DID use CW. However, I
know the real reason everyone wants to keep CW req's.... Because they had
to learn it, why shouldn't we...


Hey, kids,

If you want to have fun, count the typical UNINTELLIGENT hardcore HF
response quotes in this article. (not mine, the gentleman who kindly set
me straight...hehehe)


73 to everyone who could come up with a response more intelligent than
this (like perhaps my living room carpeting), good or bad. I like hearing
everyone's opinion.


Nate.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 1996 17:52:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4jhpj4$[e-mail]>
References: <4jh731$[e-mail]>

Getting completely off the topic of HF... but, you are strange!  Just by
reading your messages that you send to backup your point it scares me.
You don't get angry you just write and use strange come backs.

                             I don't know... strange people on here!



                                            \\|//
                                           (o o)                     Smile
and be happy!
-----------------------------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo--------------------------
---------------------------------------------

N9MXT - Jeffrey


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:17 1996
From: [e-mail] (N9MXT1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 29 Mar 1996 18:17:53 -0500
Message-ID: <4jhr31$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]>

Hmmm reading your message was very interesting.  I personally feel you
wrote the  message for 1 of 2 reasons.

1) Maybe you thought the Newsgroups were becoming quiet and thought that
writing a     message against HF would stir-up some activity!
2)  Maybe you have nothing else to write about!?!? and thought to yourself
hmmm who      can I put down today??

OK... well, theirs many aspects to the hobby and some people like HF and
others I
guess don't!  Personally, I find pleasure working DX and working
contests..  I have accomplished many awards for my working stations on HF.
ie: DXCC / WAS / WAZ and more. When, I get on HF I have normal
communications with fellow hams and also have my short exchanges too.  I
know people personally who hate HF only cause they are to lazy to upgrade
to have the HF privilege added to their license. So, you have a right to
hate HF but, if your justing going out and bashing the HFers like myself
you should at least write another message after upgrading from NO-CODE to
a higher class! "Just an idea!".  Basically, the ending to your message
saying "I've worked my share of HF, I thus I have not upgraded" only tells
people that you did this via CB radio or your willing to operate illegal
on bands you don't have rights too.  So, why should anyone care what you
think!!!!  If you don't like the laws that the FCC made in this country
then maybe move to another country where you don't have these rules to
follow.
  Well, I don't want to put you down or anything but you seem to have a
lot of problems    on your mind so maybe you should get some help!

                       Have fun complaining... HFer's BEWARE of people
like this!!
                                                      Jeffrey - N9MXT1

                                            \\|//
                                           (o o)                     Smile
and be happy!
-----------------------------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo--------------------------
---------------------------------------------

N9MXT - Jeffrey


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Ari Husa)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Subject: KAM Upgrades
Date: 29 Mar 1996 18:56:52 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I have been offered an old Kantronics KAM TNC.

It does not seem to know the latest HF modes (e.g. PACTOR, G-TOR).

What are the upgrade possibilities for it?

The serial number is 100 06262 and the EPROM has a label '2.85'.

Thanks,

        Luru
--

///  AriMattiJuhaniHusaOH8NUPAri.Husa@iki.
o-o  fiTiedonkaari6D25FIN-90570OULUFinland
 o   9405020236http://www.iki.fi/ari.husa/



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bill Soon)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-51r Reviews
Date: 29 Mar 1996 19:00:03 -0700
Message-ID: <4ji4j3$[e-mail]>
References: <4j4d49$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Please define "unable to erase a memory once programmed" -- does this
mean that that memory position is also unchangeable????

-- Bill --- KF6ZO

[e-mail] (Jerry Cupples) wrote:

>In article <4j4d49$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (J. Miner) wrote:

>> Hi
>>
>> I am Interested in the yeasu FT-51r and just wanted to know how other Ham
>> liked the rig.
>>
>> Thanks and 73,
>> Jon N2XFZ


>I like it. Works well.

>Only drawbacks are no direct (plug/jack) DC power input to the radio. I
>suggest buying the E-DC-12 DC adapter and the FBA-14 AA battery case
>(which regrettably don't work _together_). Covers all the local repeaters
>on both bands for me when used at base location with AR270 groundplane at
>3 watts. I got the MH-12A2B remote mike, have gotten many good comments on
>audio.

>The FNB-38 9.6 V battery (600 mAh) lasts a disappointingly small time when
>used to transmit, even at reduced power. I read all the stuff about NiCd
>batteries, do it all, and then regret buying expensive, heavy battery
>packs that give you a tiny amount of power. My preference is to buy bulk
>alkaline batteries (they are 2,400 mAh) at Sam's, and throw em away. At
>about $1.20 per set, that's at least 40 sets for the price of a NiCd, and
>they last many times longer for me.

>I like the display and the keypad (backlit) and it is very small and
>solid. Has nice battery pack connection scheme inside the radio, spring
>loaded gold contact pins look very well made.

>It does have a strange limitation in not being able to erase a memory once
>programmed, and it will dump all memories if you follow manual
>instructinos for enabling then disenabling wide range reception.

>Still waffling over whether this rig is better than Kenwood TH79, but no
>major regrets.

>cheers,

>Jerry Cupples
>KC5SXA

[e-mail]     http://www.primenet.com/~wsoon/



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Kirk James Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: HT Dual-Band Amp vs. Dual-Band Mobile
Date: 29 Mar 1996 19:05:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4ji8e1$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-2103962251280001@192.0.2.1> <[e-mail]> <4j4gvp$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

After reading late in this thread, I thought I'd jump in with my two cents.

Ham rigs offer something the commercial rigs don't:  Easy programming.
When I'm traveling, I need to be able to punch in a repeater and use it.
I've got an Icom IC-2700H as my current mobile rig, and while I think
it's a piece of trash, it is convenient (I'd buy an Alinco if I had it to
do over again).

But...  I'm also a fan of commercial performance.  I've got a couple of
Syntor's stashed away that I'm planning to add the "left-coast" control
units to eventually.  Still, they're pretty big, and won't likely end up
in my car.  I'll use them as base units.

For mobiling around my county, I'm planning to purchase a couple of
Motorola MaxTrac 300's (or GM300's).  They're cheap ($500 new, less
used), synthesized, scan, have PL, etc.  They're also pretty small.  Once
I get some cash saved and mount these in my truck, the Icom will likely
remain off most of the time.  I hate it's intermod rejection (I call it
my paging receiver....doesn't matter what frequency I'm on, I can hear
pagers on most of them).

The MaxTracs are fairly easy to repair, and provide good performance.  I
don't notice intermod problems with them, and they're simple to
operate.

But still...I do need the frequency agility of a ham rig now and again.
Since I can't find a reasonable ham rig for performance, I'm stuck using
both.

I tend to avoid rock-bound rigs, since I change my mind too frequently to
buy crystals.  Also, being involved with public safety, I need a few more
channels than the averae ham.

I'm not sure this offers much of a solution to most (since it involves
high dollars having multiple radios), but it works for me.


--
 Kirk J. Smith, KD6RCT, EMT-P    |  Biological Sciences Dept, Microbiology
 [e-mail]    |  California Polytechnic State University
 http://www.calpoly.edu/~kjsmith |  San Luis Obispo, California, USA


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (R. D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Information about Utica 650-A transceiver needed
Date: 29 Mar 1996 19:36:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4jhvmf$[e-mail]>

While sorting through some things, I came across a Utica model 650-A
transceiver that I received about 12 years ago - it wasn't working
back then, and I hadn't gotten a chance to succeed in putting it back
into working condition.

Firstly, can anyone provide me with any information about this unit,
such as some specifications, etc.?  There's also a Utical V-650-A
6 meter VFO with the unit.

Back when I tried to get the 650-A working, it was giving off a
terrible acrid burning smell that I couldn't trace, and I was
concerned that the fumes might be carcinogenic or toxic.  Are the
power transformers in these units likely to short out and cause
such fumes (gave me a slight sore throat)?

This looks like a nice solid, well-made unit, in a nice chrome chasis,
and it would be nice to at least attempt to get it working again.

Thanks very much in advance for any information that anyone can
provide about this!

--
R. D. Davis  *  http://www.access.digex.net/~rdd    \Computer preservationist.

Home: [phone] * Eccentrics have more fun! :-)\Unwanted systems gladly
Unconventional Computer Consulting & PERQ Software,   \disassembled, removed
divs. of Transpower Industries, Inc. [phone]   \for free and preserved
.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:24 1996
From: Bob Ludlum <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TS-820S Service Manual
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 21:10:20 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

I would like to buy a service manual (not owner's manual) or a good
copy of one for the Kenwood TS-820S HF Transceiver.

Bob K4LXA



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (D.W.Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Swan 600/ Heath Apache
Date: 29 Mar 1996 21:51:46 GMT
Message-ID: <4jhm1i$[e-mail]>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960326145717.17998A-100000@zippy>

-SNIP-
>I have a friend who has the Swan 600 twins and a Heathkit Apache
>transmitter.  He is wondering what a fair asking price for these would
>be.  They seem to be in pretty clean condition externally.  The Apache
>worked when it was stored and the 600 twins *might* need a little work on
>a selector switch.
-SNIP-

Apache:  $50 to $75, should be easy to sell, collectors grabbing them.
Swans:   $100 to $200, not much of a market for these.

73 de KC5NG



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:25 1996
From: [e-mail] (D.W.Hemphill KC5NG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TEN-TEC POWER-MITE;HELP
Date: 29 Mar 1996 21:54:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4jhm69$[e-mail]>
References: <4j4b76$[e-mail]>

In article <4j4b76$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
> I HAVE JUST ACQUIRED A TEN-TEC POWER MITE (20/40) QRP ROG.:
>ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT THIS RIG?:
>THANKS, BOB, WA2EAW

About one Watt output, direct-conversion rcvr, drifts like mad,
lotta fun to tinker with.  Somewhat of a collectors' item for
the QRP crowd.  Ten-Tec may still have the manual, call them.
I've gotten old manuals from them before (copies, of course).

73 de KC5NG / QRP



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:26 1996
From: Gary Pearce KN4AQ <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC 706 CROSSBAND SPLIT??? -- It Won't Do It.
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 23:19:43 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] wrote:
>
> does anyone know how to make the 706 do crossband split? i would like to use
> it for the rs10 and rs 12 sattelites but looks like split only works in sing
le
> band
> thanks
> barry
> wb1edi

Hi, Barry.

The 706 will not work split across bands -- only within the same band.

73,
Gary KN4AQ


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:28 1996
From: [e-mail] (MikieLksIt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood 870 ,Icom 775 or YAESU FT-1000mp?
Date: 30 Mar 1996 00:05:45 -0500
Message-ID: <4jiff9$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (MikieLksIt)

I just ordered the FT1000MP and am waiting for it to arrive.

I considered the 870, but I wanted the sub vfo feature badly enough to
knock that rig out of the box.  Although I really liked the idea that PC
software was included in the package.  This is something Icom and Yaesu
need to mimic!

That left the IC 775, and the MP.  I called around for pricing on both.
Aside from the fact that the IC 775 is much more expensive than the MP, I
was told by several different dealers that the IC 775 was buggy. A friend
reinforced this by mentioning that he had heard on the local DX repeater
several hams complaining about their 775's.  In this instance, the
complaint was the the main VFO failed - as in broke.  Three hams on the
repeater reporting the exact same problem.  This was very disturbing news
to me relative to the price of the rig.  However, I have also been told by
other hams claiming knowledge of the Icom situation, that the lastest
iteration of the 775 seems to have all the kinks worked out.  If true, the
Icom has some nice features that the MP does not.  The sub receiver on the
Icom is better, and you have more control over it than the MP.  Another
obvoius difference is the higher power output of the 775.  If I recall
correctly, I beleive that the DSP arrangement on the 775 is better that
the MP.  But both rigs also have 'normal' filtering as well - if you have
any money left over the buy them.

Personaly, I don't care for the 775 display.  I prefer the Yaesu display.

I chose the FT1000MP partly because the price was right for my budget, and
also because I was leary of the 775 reputation for relability.  Last thing
I want is to spend $3000 - $4000 on a radio that doesn't work.  (Hope you
are listening Mr. Yaesu!).  The MP has almost every feature I could want,
and I expect it to remain in my shack for about as long as my first HF rig
- 10 years.   We'll see...........

73,

Mike






From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:29 1996
From: Jim Nance <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood 870 ,Icom 775 or YAESU FT-1000mp?
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:33:03 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4jiff9$[e-mail]>

Mike I had operated all three radios on more than one occasion at a

local ham store prior to buying my radio. Immediately the TS-870 was

ruled out. Reading the receiver SPECS ONLY in the reviews of all three

units in QST and paying no attention to the reviewers likes/dislikes I

feel the ICOM 775DSP comes out on top. I bought the ICOM 775DSP in

November 1995 and have not been sorry.  One other thing I personally

perfer the display on the 775 vs the 1000mp.

73 de KE4WY


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:30 1996
From: [e-mail] (George W. Zachmann)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info on CW only xcvrs ??
Date: 30 Mar 1996 02:35:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4ji6ll$[e-mail]>

I am looking for a CW only HF transceiver with VFO.  I know Heath made
an HW-99 model.  I believe Drake made one also, anyone know the model
number ? Any others?
                                                Thanks

                                                George, KG6GA



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:31 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gary Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC 706 CROSSBAND SPLIT???
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 05:43:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4jii1d$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

[e-mail] wrote:

>does anyone know how to make the 706 do crossband split? i would like to use
>it for the rs10 and rs 12 sattelites but looks like split only works in singl
e
>band
>thanks
>barry
>wb1edi
Barry,

It is not possiable to do this on the IC-706.  It has a maximum 4 megs
offset.

Gary



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:32 1996
From: [e-mail] (LEAJON1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: tailgate space at Dayton
Date: 30 Mar 1996 06:00:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4jj47s$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (LEAJON1)

If anyone has an extra space at Dayton contact me at:
[e-mail]
or 717-532-1775.
                                             Jon  N3AJB


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:33 1996
From: "miker in Tigard, OR." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: degaussing (sp?) a picture tube
Date: 30 Mar 1996 06:38:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4jiksu$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

What you need is AC with a lot of amp-turns.  typical commercial degaussing co
il has many turns of about
number 18 wire.  You can accomplish the same thing with more amps in fewer tur
ns.
One thing that is easy to make and works in a pinch is to use one turn of numb
er 12 wire or so.
You need lots of amps.  Easy place to get them is from a soldering gun.  The k
ind with the trigger and
loop of copper for the heating element.  Remove the tip.  Connect a circle of
wire about a foot in
diameter.  Pull the trigger when several feet away.  Sweep around the CRT.  Le
t go of the trigger when
several feet away.  If you let go near the crt, you will really magnetize thin
gs.
If you get lots of pretty color patterns on the screen, it's working.
The wire can get hot enough to set things afire.  Don't leave it on more than
a few seconds.
Good luck.



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:34 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Problem with HeathKit SB-200
Date: 30 Mar 1996 06:46:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4jjdup$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I have a SB-200 that has a high voltage problem.  The meter report a high volt
age of
only 1700vdc and not the required 2400vdc for normal operation.  Has any one e
ncountered
this problem.  Any help would be great, as I don't want to rebuild the entire
power supply to
find the problem.

Thanks and 73's

Mike


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:34 1996
From: [e-mail](Richard J Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS 2M Amp, Experiences?
Date: 30 Mar 1996 07:00:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4jim6f$[e-mail]>
References: <lui-1903961724120001@192.0.2.1> <[e-mail]> <4iua8e$[e-mail]>

In <4iua8e$[e-mail]> [e-mail]
(Rich Mulvey) writes:
>
>>Stephen Lui wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any experience with the RS 2M amplifier? I want to
use it
>>> with my Icom IZ-Z1A handheld. How does it compare with the other
>$100
>>> amps like the Mirage and Daiwa? The RS 2M amp is on sale for $99
until
>
>
>   I have one, and, while it works well, I'm starting to wish that I
had
>purchased a class A/B amp so I could use it with something other than
>FM...
>
>- Rich
>
>


Have a freind who uses one with an HTX 202 and he likes it alot

Rick     KC7AXU


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:35 1996
From: [e-mail] (Radiomatt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Subject: Re: Cheated by MARTIN DURHAM WT1S
Date: 30 Mar 1996 08:19:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4jjccr$[e-mail]>
References: <4jeodg$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Radiomatt)

Barry is not disabled.
Durham is!
Barry seems to live a decent life.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:36 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (John Seney)
Subject: Mac Ham Users Group
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 09:08:36 GMT


"Macnet Roster" (ver. 739) has just been updated and is now a stand-alone
application! The version number = the number of hams using Macs.

"Macnet Roster" lists:

    o CALL SIGN @ HOME PBBS
    o FULL NAME
    o ADDRESS
    o CITY, STATE, ZIP
    o INTERNET ADDRESS
    o MACS USED
    o RADIOS USED
    o SOFTWARE USED
    o PASSIONS
    o COMMENTS

of every known amateur radio operator in the world that uses a Mac computer.

You can use "Macnet Roster" to find other Mac users that you can then
communicate with directly. Compare notes on software, applications, ideas,
hints and kinks, and make new ham friends that use the same computer you do.
(You already know how cool you are - imagine accessing "the rest of us"!)

      If you'd like the latest "Macnet Roster":

    Send me a formatted disk in a self addressed and stamped disk mailer
    that is in a large envelope clearly marked "ROSTER".

Or connect to my home page via the WWW

http://www.mv.com/ipusers/wd1v

Put YOUR INFO (via EMAIL or disk using TEACH TEXT) if you'd like to be include
d
in the "Macnet Roster" or send an update to your stats to me via pkt or email
anytime.


                 John D. Seney |_|_|_|_| e-mail: [e-mail]
             144 Pepperidge Dr |_|   |_| www http://www.mv.com/ipusers/wd1v
     Manchester, NH 03103-6150 |_|_ _|_| wireless: [e-mail]
      Voice Mail: 603-533-3472 | | | | | skytel page: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:37 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dale Kight)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: NEC-8201A  COMPUTER
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 11:07:57
Message-ID: <4jjpo4$[e-mail]>

NEC PC-8201A laptop

VERY VERY VERY GOOD CONDITION ..  For those of you that know what
this unit is, it's a deal at $120.00

No manual

This unit dates back to 1984  + -
******************************************************************************
******
Dale Kight   NH6VR    3231 NW 50th St. #232 Oklahoma City, Ok. 73112
E-mail:  [e-mail]     Phone  [phone]    Pager 405-781-8292

Looking for:
     1.   Hallicrafters SX-140 Rcvr
     2.   Lafayette HE-30 Rcvr
     3.   National NC-270
******************************************************************************
******



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:39 1996
From: [e-mail] (MikieLksIt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood 870 ,Icom 775 or YAESU FT-1000mp?
Date: 30 Mar 1996 11:12:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4jjmh6$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (MikieLksIt)

Hi Jim.

You are undeniably correct that the IC-775 enjoys the best specs/feature
mix of the three.  I could have lived with the display, but budget was my
main issue.  Secondary to $$ was my concern over the reported reliability
issues.

Although I am well aware that the MP is too new to yet have a rep for
either good reliabity or bad.  I'll have to find out the hard way.  No
dealers claimed knowledge of any reported problems with the rig..........

Glad to hear that you have had no problems with your 775. Hopefully the
dealers were right that Icom jumped on the issues and fixed them.....I
would hate to see anybody spend that kind of money and then get
disappointed........

73,

Mike - WA2QIC


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:40 1996
From: [e-mail](LARRY PIKE )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info on CW only xcvrs ??
Date: 30 Mar 1996 12:50:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjame$[e-mail]>
References: <4ji6ll$[e-mail]>

In <4ji6ll$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (George W.
Zachmann) writes:
>
>I am looking for a CW only HF transceiver with VFO.  I know Heath made

>an HW-99 model.  I believe Drake made one also, anyone know the model
>number ? Any others?
>                                               Thanks
>
>                                               George, KG6GA
>
TenTec Century 21 & 21-D (digital) are oldies but goodies...
direct conversion receivers 30w output -- smoooooth little toys

Also Century 22  --  later model / smaller    I think still direct
conversion. (never tried one of them but probably worth owning)

Also -- if you want to try QRP, the little MFJ single banders are very
nice and you really can work almost anything you hear with 5 watts. You
cant go wrong for $140 investment -- resale value @ $125 so buy one,
play with it and sell it when youre tired of it at a cost of $15 to own
it!

73
wd9hcr
Larry



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:41 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What HF rig should a newbie buy ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 30 Mar 96 15:33:55 EST
References: <4iupai$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world

In article <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]
> writes:
> Jonathan M. Tallon wrote:
>>
>> Well, I've aquired my tech-plus license, and now I'm pinching my
>> pennies to get a hf rig, & a 2m ht.  I've got all the catalogs, but
>> sorting out the features & jumping back and forth between
>> descriptions and price lists makes it nearly impossible to compare
>> models --  which brings me to my question - what hf rig (new or used)
>> will get the job done, cheaply.  Actually, I'd prefer to buy a used
>> rig - it seems like new ones start over $1200, which is waaaaay too
>> much for my budget.  Any advice would be GREATLY appreaciated.  Also,
>> which 2m ht is the best for a newcomer ?
>>
>> I know the questions are vague, hopefully you can see where I'm
>> getting at with all of this though.  Again, thanks in advance.
>>
>>  --
>>         "Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines"
>>                                         -Enzo Ferrari-
>>
>>           Jonathan M. Tallon      [e-mail]      M.T.U.
>>                          KC8CVN - Amateur radioYou will get all sortw of ad
vice.  I recommend trying to hook up with a
> used ICOM IC-735.  If you can, get the Icom power supply with it and tryi
> to find one with a 500 or 250 hz cw filter (I prefer the 250 hz, you will
> need it later on).  The IC-735 has been around for a long time and it is
> hard to find because it is a fine rig.
>
> As to the 2-mtr handheld, I am very happy with my Yaesu FT-470.  It is a
> dual-bander (144/450).  You really should look for a daul bander -- they
> don't cost that much more and you have a lot of flexibility.
>
> Best advice I can give you is:  Shop around; ask lots of questions; do
> not buy the first thing that pops up.  If you are not cmfortable with the
> guy you are doing business with, don't buy from him.  Take your time.

I agree, the 735 is a great rig. Also I would add a Yaesu FT747 as well;
you should be able to find one for about $500. And I also have an FT470.
It is a solid, rugged radio. It's got slight intermod problems, but not
as much as some other handhelds.
Also you may want to look at the FT530 - another Yaesu dual band handheld.
They are being discontinued, and are being sold for less than $300 new
by at least one of the mail-order houses.

Joe - AA3GN

--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:42 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Chandler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 96 15:53:37 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjle1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4jh731$[e-mail]>

Looks like another address and subject for my kill file.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:43 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Yaesu HT Nicad dissasembly
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 16:01:53 GMT

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Steve Mason) writes
:
>Hi all.
>I have a bad Nicad pack from an FT-530.  If I remember correctly, tha last
>time I tried to dissassemble a Yaesu pack from a 470, it was extremely
>difficult.
>Does anyone have any tips?
>I was thinking of using a heat gun to soften the glue...

Think freezer instead. Freeze the pack then rap it against a hard
surface. The glue will part. The glue they use gets brittle when
it is cold, usually much more brittle than the plastic. :-)

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | Due to provider problems
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | with previous uucp address
es
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | Email to [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:44 1996
From: [e-mail] (DAVE M . SCHERTZER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: How to catch ArtSci magazine?
Date: 30 Mar 1996 17:04:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjpiv$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

A R T S C I :

Email: [e-mail]
WWW  : http://www.earthlink.net/~artsci
Phone: [phone]
Fax  : [phone]
or
       P.O. BOX 1428
       Burbank, CA 91507

Hope this [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:45 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Patrick Croft)
Subject: KWD TS130 or TS140 INFO?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Keywords: Kenwood
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 17:37:21 GMT

Dear Fellow Hams -

I have a friend interested in info on these older Kenwood rigs, but my persona
l experience is nil. Any inputs welcome.
He is interested in a good rig for mobile operation and some light duty portab
le operating.  While the new 706's, TS50's,
DX70's etc are all great, the sticker is above his goal for the purchase.  Any
 other suggestions welcome (ie: IC735, FT-XXX,
etc)  Don't forget to say why you like or dislike.  If any interest I'll conso
ildate and post a summary.

Thanks in advance gang!

Patrick WB9IQI


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:46 1996
From: Raymond Palmore <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mars/CAP TH 75A xmit needed
Date: 30 Mar 1996 17:52:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjscl$[e-mail]>

I know this is an older radio and Have had the rcv mod in for years.
But now need the xmit mod....  tnx




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:46 1996
From: [e-mail] (Carl H Nord)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help! need manual Genave GTX-600
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 18:00:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4jji4d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Help need manual, schematic etc. for this old 6 mtr FM rig.
Contacted factory and they told me they had lost all copies in a fire.
Anybody able to help me ?
Thanks
Carl
WA1KPD



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:47 1996
From: [e-mail] (Chris Dorn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTD: Opinions on Ten-Tec Paragon I and II
Date: 30 Mar 1996 18:10:02 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjtdq$[e-mail]>

Hi,
  I am interested to learn more about the Paragon I and II radios
manufactured by Ten-Tec. I have read the 1988 QST review on the Paragon I
and the RX looks like it put in some pretty good figures. I have been
unable to locate any reviews on the Paragon II which I think was released
in 1994. What are the differences between the I and the II? Are there any
published reviews on the II? I know that the Omni VI is very highly
regarded, and am wondering whether the Paragon just doesn't measure up
against the Omni, and that's why you don't hear much about it. I notice
that Ten-Tec hardly advertises it compared to the Omni. It would be
helpful to hear some operator's impressions of the Paragon I or II.
Thanks,
Chris VE6RDC



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:48 1996
From: [e-mail] (Shawn Hecker)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Problems w/ BC-210 scanner.
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 18:56:38 GMT
Message-ID: <4jjlct$[e-mail]>

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could help me out with this old BC-210
scanner. The problem is that when I am scanning the 10 channels I have
programmed into it, sometimes when there is a signal on one of the
channels, it will play about .2 seconds of the transmission and then
continue scanning until it comes back to that channel, then it plays
another .2 seconds and continues doing that until the end of the
transmission. The result sounds like shit and I can't (obviously) hear
the transmission. It is ANNOYING as hell because I miss soooo many
transmissions like that. I tried adjusting the squelch, antanna,
position, etc. with no luck. Another thing that should be taken into
concideration is when I leave it on one particular channel, it will
always pick up the transmission and won't "pop" or anything. I think
the problem may be the scanning speed may be set too fast but I don't
know how to fix it (maybe it's a crystal?)

Well, thanks for any help you can give me.

Shawn ([e-mail])



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:49 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile HF tranceiverrs??
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 96 19:02:35 GMT
Message-ID: <4jk0t6$[e-mail]>
References: <4j0s7h$[e-mail]> <4j76sd$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (Dennis Collin) wrote:

>There's also the TenTec Scout 555, which a local guy here SWEARS by,
>but it didn't excite me ...

I've worked several guys using these recently who had frequency
stability problems.  The QSO's were on CW, and the VFO (PTO?) in the
Scout would jump around at random with a shift of about 50-100 Hz.  Is
this a common problem with these rigs?

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Problem with HeathKit SB-200
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 96 19:09:53 GMT
Message-ID: <4jk1as$[e-mail]>
References: <4jjdup$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] wrote:

>I have a SB-200 that has a high voltage problem.  The meter report a
>high voltage of only 1700vdc and not the required 2400vdc for normal
>operation.

Have you measured the AC voltage at the secondary of the transformer?
What happens to the DC voltage when you load the amp?  Is there
excessive ripple on the RF signal at the output?

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:50 1996
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info on CW only xcvrs ??
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 96 19:18:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4jk1qm$[e-mail]>
References: <4ji6ll$[e-mail]>

   [e-mail] (George W. Zachmann) wrote:

>I am looking for a CW only HF transceiver with VFO.  I know Heath
>made an HW-99 model.  I believe Drake made one also, anyone know the
>model number ? Any others?

Ten Tec has made a few.  If you're looking for a superhet and good
QSK, that's probably the way to go.

73,
Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:52 1996
From: Les Butler <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mods for the FT-51R Yaesu
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 19:29:02 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

David H. Malin wrote:
>
> Just wondering if anyone knew of all the mods for the Yaesu 51R. Or at
> least point me in the right direction.  Thanks
>
>                                 73's
>                                Dave AA6RV
> --
> *****************************************
> *                                       *
> *     Dave H. Malin                     *
> *     30447 N. Sunrose Pl               *
> *     Canyon Country,Ca 91351           *
> *     Home 805-298-0300                 *
> *     Work 213-485-2918                 *
> * ------------------------------------- *
> *     Communications Electrican         *
> *     City Of Los Angeles               *
> * ------------------------------------- *
> *     TSgt 146 Aero Medical Evac Sqn    *
> *     California Air National Guard     *
> * ------------------------------------- *
> *     Old West Lodge No. 813 F.& A.M.   *
> *     Southern Calif Harley Riders Ass  *
> *     AA6RV Amatuer Radio Call Sign     *
> *                                       *
> *****************************************


If you own the ADMS-1 software you can edit the win.ini file area that
is titled FT-51 Programmer

The line will look like this:
allowanyfrequency=0

change it to

allowanyfrequency+1

This will open up the receive only but it opens it up from about 60Mhz
to over 500 for good reception.


Also if you own this program why not pick up the latest upgrade from my
home page.

http://www.cris.com/~lsbutler

Look for my Ham link page and it's near the bottom.

Les


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:54 1996
From: Les Butler <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: FT-51R HACKING PROJECT UPDATE
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 19:39:25 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

David Martin wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Joe I am not saying that they HAVE to do anything only that they
> will not supply the information to anyone. Therefore I shared that
> information with folks here on the net so they know not to waste
> their time!
>
> David
>
> PS Nothing wrong with that. But glad you brought the point
> up anyhow. Thanks.
>
> Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
> : [snip]
>
> : Why should EZclone, RT, Yaesu or anyone else divulge trade secrets to you?
> : It's their engineering time, and if they choose to sell their results, the
y
> : have every right to.
> : Joe - AA3GN
> : --
> : Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford
, PA
> : [e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of cour
se..


Very interesting thread. Why should anyone invest time and money into
something and give it away?

Try calling Ford, G.M. or Chrysler and asking them to send you details
on their engine control systems so you can hack them.

Call General Instruments and ask about hacking into their Video Cipher 2
system for satellites.

I'm sure you'll get the same answer from all. What's the point? You're
willing to sell the information to others after you figure it out. Isn't
that the same as selling the software? If you figure it out because
nobody will tell you, why not give the details away for free much the
same as you're asking?

Les


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:55 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (charles copeland)
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jh731$[e-mail]> <4jhpj4$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 22:04:52 GMT

In article <4jhpj4$[e-mail]>, N9MXT1 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Getting completely off the topic of HF... but, you are strange!  Just by
>reading your messages that you send to backup your point it scares me.
>You don't get angry you just write and use strange come backs.
>
>                             I don't know... strange people on here!
>
>N9MXT - Jeffrey

Your first message you attempt to insult the original poster,
now you try to alienate him.

Gee, I hope I never run into you on HF, your not a nice person.

KC5LWF



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:56 1996
From: Steve Dworkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Equalizer comments wanted
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 22:13:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkbo1$[e-mail]>

I have heard a number of stations (usually quite critical
of their audio) that claimed to be using studio quality
microphones and audio equalizers.  My questions are twofold.
(1) Does anyone know of a source for used studio mics?
(2) What kinds of equalizers are applicable for this purpose?
eg. Can you use a stereo-type equalizer just positioned into
the audio line between the mic and the radio, or are these
also studio-grade or special application units?  These guys
always have booming signals with extremely real sounding audio.
I cant go up another 100 ft, nor can I afford some of the amps
out there, but this may be a feasable and fun place to really
improve my station.  Does anybody out there have any experience
in this area?


Steve Dworkin, N2MDQ
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:57 1996
From: Josh Pavlovich <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Any info on FT-50?
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 22:46:05 +0000
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ivqm9$anq$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
To: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>

Jeff Goldman wrote:
>
> I've been told that it'll be introduced officially on April 1. And that
> it has 800MHz coverage (with no cellular). It's already out in Japan.
> It has a 15kHz filter vs the FT10/40 12kHz one.


Does anyone know if this is the same case design as the FT10/40.
Basically, I need to know if it will use the same battery. Any info
would be great.

Thanks
Josh


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:58 1996
From: [e-mail] (Thomas P. Branch)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 30 Mar 1996 23:29:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkg5g$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]>

In article <4jelum$[e-mail]>, From [e-mail] (Nathan
Ryan Gingras), the following was written:
> Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save

>
> you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
> worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded. >

How would he know?  It's illegal for him to work HF!



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:58 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Dave Blizzard)
Subject: Yaesu FT530 help!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 31 Mar 96 00:20:29 GMT

I recently bought a new FT530 from the local dealer but can't find a
source for the coax plug used to power this HT from an external DC
supply. As usual the manual doesn't provide the spec, all it says is
either a 3.7mm or 4.0mm plug (depending on where you look in the
manual) but the inside diameter is not specified. All the usual local
sources don't have anything that will fit.
What size is it really???
Any help would be appreciated.
--
---------------------------------------------
73's from Dave Blizzard - VE3SVL
[e-mail]
---------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:04:59 1996
From: [e-mail] (Geert Pirens)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Can anybody help me on a articel in  '73 magazine' march 1991.
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 00:35:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkju2$[e-mail]>

Hello,


Can somebody help me on this article in '73 magazine' in march 1991.

March 1991, '73 Magazine' has an article by John Hoots on page 12
with a description of modifications that can be made to some scanners
to improve the I.F. bandwidth.

I live in europe and i'm not able to catch up some articles or buy
one!!

I hope there is someone who will help me on this.

Can someone make a few copy of this article and send it to:

      Geert Pirens, ONL2057
      Flekeleerstraat 54
      B-3600  GENK
      BELGIUM

Greatfule thanks!!!!

73!

Geert Pirens, ONL2057





From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:00 1996
From: [e-mail] (RVH1)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Anybody want old equipmet?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 01:07:59 -0500
Message-ID: <4jl7fv$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RVH1)

I had the pleasure of cleaning out someones garage today. Among many other
things, there was a lot of radio parts. No complete radios, but tons of
tubes, switches, transformers, knobs, old WW2 army surplus switches,
aircraft radios, rectifiers, heat-sinks, resistors, antenna dummy loads,
you get the idea. Basiclly a tinkerers corner.

Is this stuff something that anyone would want. My father says call the
local ham club and see if they wanted it for a fund raiser. How do you
find a local ham club, and what is your opinion on weather or not they
would have something they could sell at a swap meet.

Please email any replies.
Thanks very much,
Vince


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:02 1996
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail] (Michael L. Ardai)
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]> <4jkg5g$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:11:04 GMT

In article <4jkg5g$[e-mail]> [e-mail]
m (Thomas P. Branch) writes:
-In article <4jelum$[e-mail]>, From [e-mail] (Nathan
-Ryan Gingras), the following was written:
-> Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
-> you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
-> worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded. >
-How would he know?  It's illegal for him to work HF!

Not necessarily...  What about
  with another ham acting as control op
  thru a cross-band repeater
  he had a license that expired

(not saying that any of these are the answer in this case, but a no-code
 tech *can* work HF legally under certain conditions...)
/mike

--
\|/     Michael L. Ardai        N1IST       [e-mail]     \|/
-*- --- Boston Amateur Radio Club:  http://www.barc.org/barc --- -*-
/|\        or send "info barc-list to [e-mail]        /|\


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:03 1996
From: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Any info on FT-50?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 01:18:54 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkmi3$3r$[e-mail]>

April Fools joke to you, too. Clock/alarm? The wrong band endpoints? 800MHz
trunked/cellphone capability? Digital track tuning? Dual RX in any
combination? 400 memories? Backlit keypad? ADMS-1B not the correct ADMS-1C?

Yuck yuck. Believe it or not, a friend called me up all excited about your
message! The only thing you left out was an incredible price. How does
$299 sound... for the 5 watt version with the digital voice recorder? <g>

                            -Jeff


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:03 1996
From: [e-mail] (Bostonian)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTD: RCA WT-100A OR HICKOK 700 TUBE TESTER
Date: 31 Mar 1996 01:38:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4jknng$[e-mail]>

RCA WT-100A and/or Hickok 700 tube tester wanted.  Seeking unit in good
running condition, needing some repairs or for parts (if I later come across
a working unit).  Willing to swap for something or please state a fair price
for the respective unit.  I would prefer swapping something as cash is tight,
but I would have to find out what you are looking for -- I may have it.
Please indicate if you have manuals, schematics, charts and/or plug-in tube
sockets for the respective tube tester.

Kindly, email with details.

Thank you.



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:04 1996
From: [e-mail] (KD4GEU)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TM-733A CrossBand Repeat
Date: 31 Mar 1996 02:07:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4jlb03$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KD4GEU)

Let me know what kind of replys you get on the requests about the 733. I
own on also.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:05 1996
From: [e-mail] (Joe Leikhim)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Drake TR7 for sale
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 03:08:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4jktes$[e-mail]>

For Sale;

DRAKE TR-7 $575

Includes DR7, FA7, PS7, plus service and operation manuals

Good Condition, Just add your microphone and antenna

Please respond via e-mail



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:06 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: KAM Upgrades
Date: 31 Mar 1996 03:31:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkua6$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

>I have been offered an old Kantronics KAM TNC.
>It does not seem to know the latest HF modes (e.g. PACTOR, G-TOR).
>What are the upgrade possibilities for it?

Try Kantronic's web page at   http://www.kantronics.com




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:08 1996
From: Brian Webb <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.digital,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,sanet.radio.packet,alt.radio.digital
Subject: MFJ1270C - HTX212 Problems
Date: 31 Mar 1996 03:39:33 GMT
Message-ID: <4jkupl$iem$[e-mail]>

I own an MFJ1270C packet TNC. I've tried interfacing it with two
radios with no luck.

I connected it to an HTX202 HT and I had good receive, but no
transmit. I used an MFJ premade cable and a homebrew cable with
the same problem.

Yesterday I tried connecting this TNC to a Radio Shack HTX212
mobile radio. Same problem: Good packet reception, but couldn't
key my radio (I was doing the CALIBRA K transmit level
adjustment procedure).

I removed jumper L as suggested by MFJ and I also removed a 4.7
K ohm resistor that I had hooked in parallel with R140 in my
earlier attempt to use my HT.

Any idea what is going on here?

Regards,

Brian Webb, KD6NRP




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:09 1996
From: Bruce Coensgen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Choosing a GPS receiver ?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 05:19:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4jl4lo$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

The group you want is sci.geo.satellite-nav
Lots of folks there knowledgable about all sorts of GPS receivers.

Good luck!




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:09 1996
From: Bruce Coensgen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What HF rig should a newbie buy ?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 05:32:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4jl5cu$[e-mail]>
References: <4iupai$[e-mail]> <4jimlg$[e-mail]>

What the heck is a "silent key" garage sale?




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:10 1996
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB help
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:29:06 -400
Message-ID: <4jm4r7$[e-mail]>

I am looking to buy a new dual band ht 2m/70cm and am in need of one which can

be modified to go out of band especially into the 460 mHz range.  Can anyone
give me some advice on this matter?  Thanks in advance-Robert Haig KB0PYU


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:11 1996
From: [e-mail] (mlmitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Any info on FT-50?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 09:23:01 -0700
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4ivqm9$anq$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Josh Pavlovich <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Jeff Goldman wrote:
>>
>> I've been told that it'll be introduced officially on April 1. And that
>> it has 800MHz coverage (with no cellular). It's already out in Japan.
>> It has a 15kHz filter vs the FT10/40 12kHz one.
>
>
>Does anyone know if this is the same case design as the FT10/40.
>Basically, I need to know if it will use the same battery. Any info
>would be great.
>
>Thanks
>Josh


Josh,
The FT-50R will use the same accessories as the FT-10/40. It does not
have CTCSS decode included. You would have to buy the optional FTT-12
decoder unit. Yes, you would have to have the ADMS-1C Windows
programmer kit for PC programming. As far as price, that is an unknown
factor at this time, as the radio will not be introduced in the U.S.A.
until Daton Hamvention. You had better plan on somewhere around the
$500.00 price range just like the FT-51R. I have only seen an
advertisement in the back of the May, 1996 issue of CQ VHF magazine.
This IS the only add that I have seen.
73's
Bill
N0EVG


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:13 1996
From: Charles Bolland <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.noncomm,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Shortwave etc database program....
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 10:51:57 -0800
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Sir,

A stand alone IBM compatible Broadcasting Radio Station Database
program for Longwave, Mediumwave, or Shortwave.  4000 records...
Completely read/write and updateable...

If you'd like a copy, send your EMail address and Postal Address
which will be used to pass you more detailed information on
the full featured program....

The above program will be sent via EMAIL...

All information will be kept confidential....

Chuck

KA4PRF


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:14 1996
From: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Naughty Rude Words
Date: 31 Mar 1996 11:05:54 GMT
Message-ID: <4jloui$[e-mail]>


This thread having to do with the messed up FM-25 has certainly gotten the mil
eage.
We're all behaving like a bunch of politicians:  making a lot of noise about s
omething
that is not in the least bit important.  An emotional issue and therefore not
conducive
to rational discussion.
We're talking about words here, not some threat to personal or national securi
ty, or to
the health and general welfare of mankind.  Just words.
Every time I read another shrill and strident post on this subject
I think about what my son (10 at the time) said when Pee Wee Herman was busted
,
"Isn't that what people do when they watch porno flicks?"  Oh, that wonderful
purity
of a child's morality.  Come on folks, let's drop this thing for good. It's a
waste of resources
and time and it's getting ridiculous what with the patriots, the freedom fight
ers and the
moralists getting all frothed up.  What has finally done it for me is a messag
e I read today
that alludes to posts acceptable for "family channels" and "mixed company" yet
 has a
signature block that contains the suggestive double entendre "Hams do it bounc
ing off
the "F" layer."  What a hypocritical, self-righteous prig!


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:15 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 31 Mar 1996 11:20:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4jlpq7$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]> <4jkg5g$[e-mail]>

Thomas P. Branch ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <4jelum$[e-mail]>, From [e-mail] (Nathan
: Ryan Gingras), the following was written:
: > Oh, yeah, you HF'ers are all going to look up my callsign, and to save
:
: >
: > you the trouble, it's KB9LSX, and I am NO-CODE. But believe me, I've
: > worked my share of HF, and thus I have not upgraded. >
:
: How would he know?  It's illegal for him to work HF!
:
You people sure talk big for hams who don't quite know the rules:

Three words: Third Party Operation.


Nate.



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:16 1996
From: [e-mail] (John K Scoggin Jr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom 2340H MARS Mods
Date: 31 Mar 1996 12:52:08 GMT
Message-ID: <4jlv5o$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

I am looking for the MARS mods for an ICOM 2340H dual bander - I've checked
the usual sites with no luck.

Anyone done this?  Thanks for any help.

        John

--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  John K. Scoggin, Jr.                 Email: [e-mail]   |
|  Staff Technical Consultant           Phone: [phone]         |
|  Advanced Technologies                Fax:   [phone]         |
|  Delmarva Power & Light Company                                     |
|  500 N. Wakefield Drive               Ham:       N3SKO              |
|  Newark, DE 19714-6066                Army MARS: AAR3BTT            |
|                                                                     |
|  Instructor, Computer Science Dept.   Email:  [e-mail]  |
|  University of Delaware, 447 Smith    Phone:  [phone]        |
|  Newark, DE  19716                                                  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:17 1996
From: [e-mail](bumologist)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,
Subject: Re: What HF rig should a newbie buy ?
Date: 31 Mar 1996 13:35:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4jm1ng$[e-mail]>
References: <4jl5cu$[e-mail]>

Well,to put it simply,a "silent Key"means that the Ham has died(his key is
silent)So in normalspeak it means ESTATE SALE!
--

Bumologist....
BARRY FELSTEIN N8PVX


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:18 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tom, KF4FNR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 31 Mar 1996 15:50:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4jm9jr$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]> <4jkg5g$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]>, From [e-mail] (Michael
L. Ardai), the following was written:
> Not necessarily...  What about
> with another ham acting as control op
> thru a cross-band repeater
> he had a license that expired

Point taken.  I don't have a problem with any level of licensee.  Ham
Radio is a large and diverse hobby, we all need to respect what the
others are doing.  I personally enjoy HF and operating CW, but I realize
that it's not for everyone.  The original point about the contest QSO
(RST, QTH, and QRT) has some merit, but some people like working for
awards.  There are some real conversions taking place on HF!  I finally
purchased a 2 meter rig to take with me on-the-road to keep it touch
with the hobby (hotels don't like 100 watts and 80-foot antennas!) I
originally planned on a no-code license, but wanted HF.  I could have
waited another sun-spot cycle for the rules to change, but just when a
head and learned CW--discovered that it was fun along the way.  If Nate
wants to wait that's fine, the CW rule may change--if not, stop whining,
learn the code and join us on HF.

Best 73 to all!

Tom, KF4FNR



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:19 1996
From: [e-mail] (Tom, KF4FNR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 31 Mar 1996 15:50:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4jm9ju$[e-mail]>
References: <4jelum$[e-mail]> <4jkg5g$[e-mail]> <4jlpq7$[e-mail]>

In article <4jlpq7$[e-mail]>, From [e-mail] (Nathan
Ryan Gingras), the following was written:
> You people sure talk big for hams who don't quite know the rules:

My bad--allowed my emotions to bleed onto the keyboard. Please see my
other post, same subject, for a well though out reply on the subject.

73 de Tom, KF4FNR



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:20 1996
From: [e-mail] (Dan Ferguson)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate,aus.radio,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: If you don't like it!...(Was: @!#$, my FM-25 is @#&%$! What to do?)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:59:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4jma3p$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4ijvsq$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4iu54f$[e-mail]> <4j2rrd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4j6qv1$[e-mail] <[e-mail]> <4j8oul$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

"John Q. Customer" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Andy Sennitt wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> To which I would like to add that there are many of us in this
>> newsgroup who do not live in the United States, and to whom the First
>> Amendment is irrelevant.
>> It is also an insult to the vast majority of decent people who live in
>> the US and who do *not* abuse the First Amendment. Furthermore, every
>> time you post an obscene word, racist comment or whatever, you are
>> handing ammunition to those who want to see the Net more tightly
>> regulated. Ultimately, your actions could bring about curbs on the
>> very freedom you are claiming to uphold. Think about it!
>>
>> --- END OF SERMON ---
>>
>>


>That's exactly what the First Amendment protects, Einstein. It allows us
>the Freedom to abuse it, respect it, think its irrelevant, hate it, love
>it, etc.

>Obviously, your views toward the irrelevance of The First Amendment, and
>probably the U.S. Constitution, allow you to make such ignorant
>statements.

>John Q. Customer

One possible non-ignorant thing one might do is read and understand
the articles to which he responds.

One not ignorant of common courtesy would likely also sign his own
name.

dan


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ Dan Ferguson                                             [e-mail]  +
+ Opinions herein expressed are not those of the donut store I patronize. +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:21 1996
From: George Sereikas <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED...R-390A Meters...Can Anyone Help Me??
Date: 31 Mar 1996 16:43:17 GMT
Message-ID: <4jmcn5$[e-mail]>

Hi,
Thanks for reading this posting. I am looking for the original
meters for a R-390A Receiver( One is the "Carrier Level" meter
and the other is the "Line Level" meter). If anyone has one or
both of these meters or knows where I can find them, please let
me know.

Thanks alot,
George
KC2MF
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:22 1996
From: [e-mail] (Nathan Ryan Gingras)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HF sucks!
Date: 31 Mar 1996 16:54:47 GMT
Message-ID: <4jmdcn$[e-mail]>
References: <4jh731$[e-mail]> <4jhpj4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

charles copeland ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <4jhpj4$[e-mail]>, N9MXT1 <[e-mail]> wrote
:
: >Getting completely off the topic of HF... but, you are strange!  Just by
: >reading your messages that you send to backup your point it scares me.
: >You don't get angry you just write and use strange come backs.
: >
: >                             I don't know... strange people on here!
: >
: >N9MXT - Jeffrey
:
: Your first message you attempt to insult the original poster,
: now you try to alienate him.
:
: Gee, I hope I never run into you on HF, your not a nice person.
:
: KC5LWF
:

Hey, It's cool, I don't take anything here personally...


Nate.


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:23 1996
From: [e-mail] (Gene McAvoy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM W2A Repair
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:27:58 GMT
Message-ID: <4jmpm8$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]

Anyone know where I can get a flat rate quote on repair of a ICOM W2A?
Icom in Bellvue, WA wants $65. / hr with a one hour minimum before
they even open the case.  There is a ribbon cable in mine that has a
tear and I'd rather not dig into it myself...no proper tools.

HELP!

Gene / KG7XD
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:24 1996
From: Jonnycat <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: What to Buy? Need mobile rig advice...
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 21:58:31 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

Hi-

Looking for advice.  I have been using a Kenwood HT as a mobile rig in
my truck via 12V cord and magmount antenna hookup, and it doesn't work
for me.

Would like to buy a mobile rig that is very well built, as I spend lots
of time off-road and bouncing around, and has good price-to-features
ratio.  Important to me are power output, alphanumeric, and ease of use.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jon  N1UHH
Email me at <[e-mail]>


From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:24 1996
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Did he ever get the FM-25 fixed?
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 22:25:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4jmpll$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>

"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Some days ago, a gentleman posted to several newsgroups a message
>indicating that he was sorely vexed by a problem with his FM-25.
>Many people responded to his posting with comments on his choice of
>words.  While I agree that he certainly did not use genteel language, I
>can't help but wonder if he ever solved the problem with the radio?

>Just wondering.


My question is..... What the heck is an FM-25?

cdn
>Real men work QRP CW. And use DOS.




From [e-mail] Tue Apr 02 09:05:26 1996
From: [e-mail] (Jim Rospopo)
Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.digital,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,sanet.radio.packet,alt.radio.digital
Subject: Re: MFJ1270C - HTX212 Problems
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 23:42:04 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4jkupl$iem$[e-mail]>

On 31 Mar 1996 03:39:33 GMT, Brian Webb <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>I own an MFJ1270C packet TNC. I've tried interfacing it with two
>radios with no luck.
>
>I connected it to an HTX202 HT and I had good receive, but no
>transmit. I used an MFJ premade cable and a homebrew cable with
>the same problem.
>
>Yesterday I tried connecting this TNC to a Radio Shack HTX212
>mobile radio. Same problem: Good packet reception, but couldn't
>key my radio (I was doing the CALIBRA K transmit level
>adjustment procedure).
>
>I removed jumper L as suggested by MFJ and I also removed a 4.7
>K ohm resistor that I had hooked in parallel with R140 in my
>earlier attempt to use my HT.
>
>Any idea what is going on here?
>
>Regards,
>
>Brian Webb, KD6NRP
>
>
Brian,

I have a 1270c connected to a HTX 212 and everything is working fine.
The cable that I got from MFJ was wired wrong on one pin so as soon as
I fixed that everything was fine.  I would suggest that you look
closely at the radio manuals and trace the wires to the correct
connections.  Best way to do this is with a VOM using the continuity
tester.

Jim   KE4CON