home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Submitted-by: djm@eng.umd.edu (David J. MacKenzie)
-
- Keep in mind that I was only reposting Richard Stallman's message; I
- did not write it. Richard does not read Usenet groups, only the GNU
- mailing lists. I forwarded Doug's posting to him in case he wants to
- respond to it.
-
- >>Only 20 out of 750 supported the 512ist coup.
-
- > And how many supported the 1024th revisionists?
- > I know I expressed the opinion that the decision should not be made
- > until the underlying principles for making such decisions had been
- > established.. Did you count me on one side or the other?
-
- I was not involved in counting. However, I personally looked at about
- the first 200 responses. All but about 4 or 5 of the ones I read had
- the following approximate content (using different phrasing but the
- same intent):
- I strongly prefer 1024-byte blocks. Anything else is
- ridiculous and unintuitive.
- Many of the respondants mentioned that 512-byte blocks were an
- artifact of old filesystems, and are not relevant to modern systems.
- Many said they had used both Unix systems that reported in 512-byte
- units and Unix systems that reported in 1024-byte units; nearly all of
- those said they found the 512-byte systems frustrating and confusing
- and much preferred the 1024-byte systems.
-
- >>We promise to respect the rights of minorities--even tiny ones. So
- >>there will be options to request output in units of 512.
-
- > There's no smaller nontrivial minority than me. Can I specify bits or
- > bytes instead of artificial block sizes?
-
- You can specify bytes in GNU du. (I added that awhile ago because a
- previous POSIX.2a draft requried it. They removed it in the current
- draft when they chose 512-bytes as the proposed standard instead.)
- Not in df, but fsstat doesn't give measurements in bytes. You can get
- bits by multiplying bytes by 8, of course, but that's a silly unit of
- measurement since you can't allocate individual bits in a file.
- --
- David J. MacKenzie <djm@eng.umd.edu> <djm@ai.mit.edu>
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 24, Number 92
-
-