home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: marius@rhi.hi.is (Marius Olafsson)
-
- randall@uvaarpa.virginia.edu (Randall Atkinson) writes:
-
- > I'm fairly certain that it just isn't worth
- >it to try to make ISO 646 the basis of *anything* for the
- >practical reason that it wasn't well thought out to begin with
- >and has already been superceded by the ISO 8859/* family of
- >8-bit character sets.
-
- I agree. The ISO 8859 series of charactersets have the (in my opinion
- neccessary) quality that the *complete* set of ASCII characters can be
- represented. If ISO 646 will be taken into consideration must we then
- allow alternate syntax in the varius shells and utilites that make
- use of the characters {}[]@\| and ` - I think that is a can of worms
- best left unopened.
-
- >The latter fully support European linguistic needs (yes, including
- >Danish and Icelandic and ...) and can be used quite nicely with
- >most UNIX shells that I'm familiar with.
-
- And it seems that most major manufacturers already have (or have announced)
- support for ISO 8859 - at least HP-UX, Ultrix, AIX, SunOS and
- more I am sure. The X window system now supports ISO 8859 fonts, the
- latest Adobe rel of Postscripts support ISO 8859 encoding of the fonts,
- and the list goes on ... NONE provide any support for or consideration
- for ISO 646 (fortunately).
-
-
- > I fear that excessive attention will be
- >devoted to ISO 646 when there are other areas of internationalisation
- >that really deserve being thought about and solved cleanly.
-
- Definately, and serious consideration should be given to the way X/Open
- has defined some of these other areas. That system actually works pretty
- well in practice. It has been used here for about two years (on HP-UX).
-
- --
- Marius Olafsson internet: marius@rhi.hi.is
- University of Iceland UUCP: {mcsun,sunic,uunet}!isgate!rhi!marius
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 18, Number 77
-
-