home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: randall@uvaarpa.virginia.edu (Randall Atkinson)
-
- As one who is fairly active in the multilingual computing
- side of things, I'm fairly certain that it just isn't worth
- it to try to make ISO 646 the basis of *anything* for the
- practical reason that it wasn't well thought out to begin with
- and has already been superceded by the ISO 8859/* family of
- 8-bit character sets.
-
- The latter fully support European linguistic needs (yes, including
- Danish and Icelandic and ...) and can be used quite nicely with
- most UNIX shells that I'm familiar with.
-
- I thought that trigraphs got excessive attention back when ANSI C
- was being developed and I fear that excessive attention will be
- devoted to ISO 646 when there are other areas of internationalisation
- that really deserve being thought about and solved cleanly.
-
- Most of the vendors of hardware in Europe are supporting ISO 8859/1
- now, so it is the real long term solution to European needs anyway.
- Worrying about support for ISO 646 is a mistake, worrying about
- supporting ISO 8859/* and the Asian need for larger character sets
- being fully supported and ways of handling date formats and such
- aren't a mistake at all.
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 18, Number 73
-
-