home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- In article <7552@cs.utexas.edu> WHITE V L <vyw@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov> writes:
- >The current push for the UPE and for 1003.7 may be from NIST, but it originated
- >from beleagured federal government systems programmers.
-
- There are only two relevant differences between the Federal government
- and other corporate entities with respect to this issue:
- (1) The Federal rules are relatively rigid, which precludes
- negotiation between vendor and customer to obtain the
- technically best solution (when a FIPS is in force).
- (2) Closed systems are not permitted to the Federal customer
- even when they make the most sense.
- These are the product of bureaucracy, which is a perennial government
- problem. I imagine large corporations such as General Motors also have
- rather inflexible rules that may in some cases run counter to their own
- best interests.
-
- So far as systems programming in a government UNIX environment goes, it
- is not radically different from the situation in commercial industry.
-
- I am (at times) a Federal government systems programmer, but I take the
- long view of the industry. Even if something would make my job a bit
- easier in the short term, I don't want it if it's going to harm the
- evolution of computing in the long run. Premature or hasty standards
- have just that effect.
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 18, Number 19
-
-