home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.answers,news.answers
- Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!watserv3.uwaterloo.ca!undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!neumann.uwaterloo.ca!alopez-o
- From: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Alex Lopez-Ortiz)
- Subject: sci.math FAQ: f(x)^f(x)=x
- Summary: Part 17 of many, New version,
- Originator: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca
- Message-ID: <DI76L8.J8r@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner)
- Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 17:15:08 GMT
- Expires: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 09:55:55 GMT
- Reply-To: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: neumann.uwaterloo.ca
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- Followup-To: sci.math
- Lines: 55
- Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu sci.math:124391 sci.answers:3425 news.answers:57826
-
-
- Archive-Name: sci-math-faq/specialnumbers/fxtofxeqx
- Last-modified: December 8, 1994
- Version: 6.2
-
-
-
- Name for f(x)^(f(x)) = x
-
-
-
- Solving for f one finds a ``continued fraction"-like answer
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- This question has been repeated here from time to time over the years,
- and no one seems to have heard of any published work on it, nor a
- published name for it. It's not an analytic function.
-
- The ``continued fraction" form for its numeric solution is highly
- unstable in the region of its minimum at 1/e (because the graph is
- quite flat there yet logarithmic approximation oscillates wildly),
- although it converges fairly quickly elsewhere. To compute its value
- near 1/e , use the bisection method which gives good results.
- Bisection in other regions converges much more slowly than the
- logarithmic continued fraction form, so a hybrid of the two seems
- suitable. Note that it's dual valued for the reals (and many valued
- complex for negative reals).
-
- A similar function is a built-in function in MAPLE called W(x) or
- Lambert's W function. MAPLE considers a solution in terms of W(x) as a
- closed form (like the erf function). W is defined as W(x)e^(W(x)) = x
- .
-
- Notice that f(x) = exp(W(log(x))) is the solution to f(x)^f(x) = x
-
- An extensive treatise on the known facts of Lambert's W function is
- available for anonymous ftp at dragon.uwaterloo.ca at
- /cs-archive/CS-93-03/W.ps.Z.
-
-
-
-
- _________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
- alopez-o@barrow.uwaterloo.ca
- Tue Apr 04 17:26:57 EDT 1995
-
-
-