home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From hull@hao.UUCP (Howard Hull) Thu Aug 1 10:22:25 1985
- Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 (MU) 9/23/84; site pyramids.OZ
- Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
- Path: pyramids!nestor!neology!basser!munnari!seismo!hao!hull
- From: hull@hao.UUCP (Howard Hull)
- Newsgroups: net.dcom
- Subject: Lightning Protection (long)
- Message-ID: <1668@hao.UUCP>
- Date: 31 Jul 85 23:22:25 GMT
- Date-Received: 13 Aug 85 02:27:15 GMT
- Distribution: net
- Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
- Lines: 199
-
- Protecting one building or tower from lightning is fairly straightforward:
-
- 1. First order protection -
-
- On the tallest object associated with your structure, mount an
- extended umbrella-like fixture a few meters in diameter,
- with numerous sharp points along the periphery and across the
- crown, spaced about 1 meter apart. (You can make the thing
- from re-bar and heavy duty chicken wire unless you have high
- winds like we have around here.) Use a large diameter conductor
- (1 to 2 cm.) to connect the umbrella points together at the
- center and thence down to a suitable ground stake located at
- a place where soil moisture is prevalent, but more importantly,
- try to make the conductor run in a straight line with *no* sharp
- corners; use a minimum radius of 1.5 meters on any bends in the
- ground wire. Keep this wire at least 2 meters from any power or
- communications conduit at all places along its route.
-
- Theory:
- The multitude of points will emit a trickle corona continuously,
- resulting in a space charge of ionized air within 20 meters of
- the umbrella. The space charge will terminate the cloud-to-ground
- electric field across a broad hemisphere and will reduce the local
- field gradient to a value below that needed to form "leaders".
- The umbrella will likely not ever be hit by lightning; however,
- the conductor gauge is set to minimize the damage inherent in
- such a strike. (A strike, if it occurs, will likely be a
- secondary, (resulting from the shift in electrostatic field just
- after a strike) to another object within a fraction of a km.)
- This approach, you should note, puts additional stress on your
- neighbors (they will see a slight rise in their hit statistics)
- as it only postpones the discharge until the cloud has moved
- past your installation. The ground conductor is spaced from
- other conduits so that the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) associated
- with the 10000 Ampere surge will not be able to develop equivalent
- currents in parallel conductors adjacent to the ground wire.
- Using a large diameter and avoiding bends reduces the per length
- inductance discontinuities. This discourages the abandonment of
- your ground conductor in favor of nearby metal objects such as
- power conduits (resulting in hazardous elevation of the system
- ground potential to thousands of volts above the mains).
-
- 2. Second order protection -
- Protect your primary power entry by use of a surge protector
- having four main elements a.) Line fuses for each hot main NO
- FUSE FOR THE WHITE NEUTRAL. No circuit breakers (too slow).
- b.) Self extinguishing gas discharge tubes or arc chutes routed
- to a primary ground stake *separated* by 3 or more meters from the
- umbrella ground mentioned above, *not* using the same stake, even,
- and using the same linear routing algorithm mentioned above.
- c.) Heavy gauge inductors, 1 microhenry or thereabouts for typical
- 30 to 50 Ampere per phase service levels, to choke the surge out
- of the consumer side of the system. NONE IN THE WHITE NEUTRAL.
- d.) Post choke line clamping to WHITE NEUTRAL. This is where the
- witchcraft comes in. One candidate is the Metal Oxide Varistor
- (MOV). They have two disadvantages: They age, gradually reducing
- their threshold over time until one day they evaporate in a ball
- of fire during a line surge. They have a rather remote threshold
- characteristic compared to, say, a Silicon TransZorb. They have
- several advantages: They are cheap. They come in packaging that
- is familiar to professional electricians. They are generally
- more robust than Selenium or Silicon protectors. They have a
- smaller geometry than a Selenium protector. Another candidate
- is a combination protector made up from a ground referenced
- 50 Ampere triac in series with either a lower rated voltage
- MOV or TransZorb element, with the triac gate wired back to (an
- artfully positioned) tap on the gas tube/arc chute ground. From
- here (this stuff belongs in a fire-rated NEMA box) the WHITE
- NEUTRAL and GREEN NEUTRAL are tied together at this one point
- only, and passed through a medium size conductor to the primary
- ground stake by a route that is separated by 1.5 meters from
- the gas tube/arc chute ground.
-
- Theory:
- If your power line gets hit, the gas tube fires and conducts the
- surge current to ground. The 20 kilovolts experienced by your
- service entry (for about 10 microseconds) will go through the
- chokes and will cause the MOV or complex protector shunt to break
- down and draw a steadily rising current (to many tens of Amperes),
- but immediately choked to a reduced voltage. The fuses will, after
- a while, be blown away. Until then, the MOVs will clamp the
- WHITE NEUTRAL to the mains (perhaps resulting in noticeable
- rise of the common-mode voltage). It is this common-mode elevation
- which destroys your out-of-building communications interfaces.
- With everything in the building coming to 2000 volts above your
- neighbors (including your local telephone operating company),
- any common-mode paths will be severely stressed. However,
- especially withing the building, they will be less stressed than
- they would have been if the mains were allowed to diverge from
- the WHITE NEUTRAL.
-
- 3. Third level protection
- The most effective common-mode protection is an Ultra-Isolator
- Transformer. It is also rather expensive compared to differential
- line protectors and secondary Silicon TransZorb protectors.
- Although many Ultra-Isolator Transformers were utilized during
- the 1970's by sensitive computer installations, it was realized
- eventually that the most damage to main-frame equipment was done
- by differential surges (main to main on three-phase systems).
- The common-mode threat was seen as too little to justify the
- cost and complexity of installation of an ultra-isolator, which,
- by the way, can also be done ineffectively, resulting in no net
- improvement in the level of protection. The companies that
- make ultra-isolators issue complete and effective instructions
- concerning their installation. The difficulty is in getting
- industrial electricians to follow the directions.
- Thus for the benefit of the main-frame and peripheral power
- supplies, for cost effective purposes, a good differential
- surge eliminator inside the enclosure of each system power
- supply is recommended. However, remember that the common mode
- is the most destructive to your distributed data communications
- peripherals; unfortunately, to protect them you must provide
- the entire computer room and distributed CRT terminal load with
- an ultra-isolator transformer, or see that each unit is designed
- to withstand momentary local and global differences of thousands
- of volts on the signal returns. Even then, on occasion, only one
- violator located in a critical location and tied to a non-isolated
- power system elsewhere in the building can blow the whole scheme.
-
- Theory:
- Not much theory here. The entire primary winding of the transformer
- may get lifted to 2000 volts, but the secondary remains referenced
- to the computer room ground stake. The box shields around the the
- windings are tied to the stake, and short out the electric field
- that might otherwise couple to the secondary. Saturation of the
- transformer core protects the differential mode. The differential
- protectors installed in each power supply dissipate the surges
- locally and since each takes a small part of the surge energy, no
- concentration of damage will likely occur.
-
- 4. Fourth order protection
- You may get surge protectors for all communication lines leaving
- the building. Each will need a reliable path to a stout ground.
- (DEC usually specifies that the computer frame GREEN WIRE ground
- be done with a heavy gauge wire, and all surge protector grounds
- be separately returned to the distribution transformer secondary
- neutral grounding point.) You may add Silicon TransZorbs to power
- supply rails in data communications equipment.
-
- Theory:
- If one of your comm lines gets hit, or gets involved in an induced
- surge, the elevation in voltage not dissipated by the protector is
- conducted through the internal diode clamps included in most IC
- line drivers and receivers to a ground or supply rail, and thence
- to a TransZorb (a back-to-back zener with a heavy silver anode and
- thermally conductive silver leads). If enough protectors are in
- place, the common-mode surge is clubbed to death by the collective
- capability of all peripheral surge protectors operating together.
-
- And that about does it. Needless to say, if you do a good job of protecting
- your site, and one of your neighbors gets hit, you may be damaged anyhow by
- currents resulting from the elevation of your neighbor's electrical ground.
- This is especially true in Hawaii (and even more so on their mountain tops)
- where the ground is made of lava rock. If you get hit by lightning, your
- entire site goes to 25000 volts with respect to the surrounding neighborhood.
- This bleeds down to appx 2000 volts over the next 100 microseconds or so.
-
- If you have several buildings to worry about, such as may be the case for a
- university campus, putting an umbrella protector on every building will only
- cause the cloud to ground potential to develop to the point that when you
- finally do get a strike, it will be a *real killer*. It has been pointed
- out elsewhere that most lightning strikes are from the ground up to the cloud.
- Thus, More Theory (speculation):
- I suspect that the mechanism is something like this: Collisions of air
- molecules with each other and the things that make up the surface tend to
- knock electrons off the air molecules. There are other charge pair generation
- mechanisms as well, such as natural radioactive decay of Radon 222 and its
- decay products. (This specific mechanism is not my theory - see JGR Vol 90
- No D4 Pgs 5909-5916 June 30, 1985, Edward A Martell, NCAR.) The electrons,
- because of their charge, are sticky. They cling to the surfaces of various
- semi-insulators (rocks and dry dirt) and near the surface of conductors until
- enough of them are implanted to provide a counter electrical field gradient to
- repel later arrivals. The positive air ions are separated by thermal energy,
- and molecular screening prevents the immediate recombination. The charge
- separation is effected by the rising of the warmed positively ionized air.
-
- Once the charge is separated, mutual repulsion drives the electrons into the
- conductive ground layers. Later, as the air rises and water condenses,
- positively charged droplets accumulate in descending air columns at the front
- of the storm just ahead of the rising column. A field gradient is thus
- established with respect to the ground, where all the electrons are. As the
- ground is conductive, the electrons follow the cloud until, with the aid of
- conductive moisture and the turbulence of the rising and descending air column
- interface, leaders are established and a strike path is ionized and carried
- into the descending air. The electrons travel up the path in a flash (parts
- of which will have oscillations at radio frequency) and then distribute
- themselves (at a more leisurely pace, accompanied with local flashes and
- secondary flashes) in accordance with upper level gradients until there is
- nolonger sufficient gradient to ionize the cloud-to-cloud paths. Time scales:
-
- Main strike and individual secondary strikes each about 10 microseconds.
- Duration of ionized path, reversals and secondaries about 100 microseconds.
- Duration of high altitude electrical coronae readjustment about 1 millisecond.
-
- Localized differences in the final potential may result in some reverse
- strikes from a few overcharged negative clouds to the ground, or subsequently
- more numerously (after air motion), cloud to cloud "readjustments".
-
- Well, I've done it again. Darn. If this is too long, I suppose you should
- flame me for it, or if I am guilty of mis-representing known (un)truths, that
- would qualify as well. But I wanted to at least try to clear up the nature
- of lightning and its hazards a little.
- Howard Hull
- [If yet unproven concepts are outlawed in the range of discussion...
- ...Then only the deranged will discuss yet unproven concepts]
- {ucbvax!hplabs | allegra!nbires | harpo!seismo } !hao!hull
-
-
- --
- Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU), Alcatel-STC Australia, dave@stcns3.stc.oz
- dave%stcns3.stc.OZ.AU@uunet.UU.NET, ...munnari!stcns3.stc.OZ.AU!dave
- WordStar 4 - The thinking person's word processor
-