home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- REVIEWS, Page 67TELEVISIONTrying to Hype History
-
-
- By RICHARD ZOGLIN
-
- SHOW: LINCOLN
- TIME: Dec. 26 and 27, ABC
- THE BOTTOM LINE: A network attempt to duplicate The Civil
- War is filled with stars but short of eloquence.
-
-
- The Civil War was not just the pivotal event of American
- history. It provided a milestone in TV history as well. The
- astonishing popularity of Ken Burns' 12-hour mini-series, which
- aired on PBS in September 1990, profoundly shook the TV world.
- On PBS, attempts to duplicate The Civil War's success have
- ranged from big-event mini-series like Columbus and the Age of
- Disto countless American Experience documentaries. The
- commercial networks too have jealously eyed the program's hefty
- ratings. It was only a matter of time before one of them took
- a chance on a similar effort. Which is the reason for Lincoln.
-
- Airing in two parts on ABC, this four-hour documentary
- follows the Civil War model by combining archival photographs
- with excerpts from contemporaneous diaries and letters. The
- producers -- Philip Kunhardt Jr., a former managing editor of
- LIFE magazine, and his two sons Peter and Philip III -- have
- drawn on famous Mathew Brady portraits, as well as an
- extraordinary collection of Lincoln photos assembled by the
- elder Kunhardt's grandfather, Frederick Hill Meserve. There is
- music by Alan Menken (Aladdin), narration by James Earl Jones
- and readings by a stellar cast of Hollywood celebrities as the
- voices of the principals. All of them paying tribute to the most
- sainted figure in American history. How could it miss?
-
- It misses. Lincoln, despite good intentions and a great
- subject, is a textbook case of wrongheaded network decision
- making. One problem is the all-star voice-overs. Richard
- Dreyfuss, Oprah Winfrey, Glenn Close, Richard Widmark, Rod
- Steiger and Arnold Schwarzenegger (as Lincoln's Bavarian-born
- secretary, John G. Nicolay), among many others, seem to have
- been recruited mainly for marquee value. Their too famous voices
- distract from the subject matter; nor do they bring any
- particular eloquence to their tasks, least of all Jason Robards,
- who overdoes the corn-pone twang as the most uncharismatic
- Lincoln imaginable.
-
- Because it is framed around the Civil War (Lincoln's early
- life is covered only briefly in flashbacks), the series seems
- unduly repetitive of Burns' work. The writing is uninspired (on
- the Battle of Gettysburg: "It was the showdown of the war.
- Whoever won here might well claim victory overall"). And there
- is a woeful shortage of analysis. Significantly, one element of
- The Civil War that the Kunhardts did not copy was the use of
- historians to provide onscreen commentary. They are missed. We
- get plenty of piquant details about Lincoln's personal life --
- his fits of depression, his estrangement from his father, his
- big feet -- but virtually no attempt to relate these to his
- public life, or to explain the qualities that made him a great
- President.
-
- Even basic political matters are left hazy. Before the
- election of 1864, Lincoln predicted, "I am going to be beaten,
- and beaten badly." Another fit of depression, or was he in real
- political trouble? He wound up, of course, winning decisively.
- Why? No clues here. The documentary spends far more time on
- melodrama, especially the events leading up to Lincoln's
- assassination. It's an effort to hype a story that, as The Civil
- War should have proved, doesn't need it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-