World of Ham Radio 1997/WOHR97_AmSoft_(1997-02-01).iso/usenets/1995_09/_equipme.txt

Text File | 1997-02-01 | 847KB | 21,240 lines

The World of Ham Radio CD-ROM



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.charm.net!news.cais.net!oxy.rust.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Dave Kaylor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood Help
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 23:27:47 GMT
Organization: Rust Net - High Speed Internet in Detroit  810-642-2276
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <425gjr$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ms2l3.sirus.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

I am in need of a Kenwood IF-10A computer interface chipset for the
Kenwood TS-711/811 series of radios. If you have one of these you would be
willing to part with either e-mail me or phone [phone] and ask for Dave.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.kei.com!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!newstand.syr.edu!usenet
From: "Mark S. Bergman" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Discount Cellular Accessories
Date: 31 Aug 1995 23:32:50 GMT
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse NY, USA
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <425gr2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sudial2-208.syr.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 16bit)

I can supply accessories formost brands of cellular phones.
Antennas, batteries, cases, chargers, mounts, hands free kits, etc..

improve your portable phone's in car performance: add a car antenna and a
coupler or adapter to connect your phone to the outside antenna.

inquiries via e-mail please to: [e-mail]

thanks,

Mark Bergman
Benchmark Communications



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Jose Antonio Gonzalez)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: EIMAC 3CX2500F3
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 23:36:29 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <425gvk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip145-20.ut.nl.ibm.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Hello!

I have just got this tube from a OM radio station, I think that it is
in use still. Some questions:

1. Any idea about this tube?
2. Any use for an HF amplifier?
3. How can I check if it is still "alive"

Best 73


--
__________________________________________________________________________
Jose Antonio Gonzalez Lorenzo --- [e-mail] ---  Amateur Radio: EA2BSN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!gryphon.phoenix.net!usenet
From: "T. Hanson" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.ham-radio,ott.jobs,ott.forsale.other,ott.forsale.computing,ont.jobs,newbridge.rec,newbridge.notice,newbridge.forsale,misc.invest.technical,misc.invest.stocks,misc.invest.canada,bc.jobs,alt.current-events.russia,ab.jobs
Subject: Re: $1,800 WEEKLY! MAILING OUR CIRCULARS
Date: 1 Sep 1995 03:39:00 GMT
Organization: Phoenix Data Systems
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <425v8k$[e-mail]>
References: <41ii92$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <41t2vt$[e-mail]> <41t842$[e-mail]> <41v3t2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial30.phoenix.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:85864 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9282 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16502 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13558 misc.invest.technical:16209 misc.invest.stocks:69007 misc.invest.canada:14845 alt.current-events.russia:11011

[e-mail] (Igor Chudov @ home) wrote:
>John L. Rouse ([e-mail]) wrote:
>* Bell-Northern Research <[e-mail]> wrote:
>* >
>* > Come and visit our WWW site we may be able to help you advertise your mail
>* > order business.  We offer many different types of jobs and income opportunities
Isn't it funny how by you spamming back you get your site spammed all
around.  When will you self appointed internet police learn to ignore the
post, and mail the postmaster.


>* > for everyone!!
>* >
>* > http:******
>* >
>* Boy, this really has a lot to do with ham radio, doesn't it?
>* Just another example of the greedy in hot pursuit of the
>* greenback without actually spending money for advertising..
>* I see this is also copied to alt.current-events.russia. Lots
>* of potential there -- get your kiosk on the Internet, hi...
>
>Just mail to his postmaster.
>--
>    - Igor. SCS&R Yellow Pages: http://www.galstar.com/~ichudov/index.html
>   For public PGP key, finger me or send email with Subject "send pgp key"
>"There is something sexy about a computer nerd."   - actress Sandra Bullock


--

Sincerely,
Todd H. Hanson

E-Mail [e-mail]
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.sandia.gov!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!usenet
From: Gerald Schmitt <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DX-70 MODS and IC-706 PRICE - I have both
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 95 07:45:56 mdt
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <42734j$[e-mail]>
References: <423me2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: transitory2.lanl.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage


Hi Joe,

I tried to e-mail you re: the DX-70 mods but the mail
bounced. Please drop me an e-mail and I will reply
with my fax# or if you prefer send specific instructions
via e-mail.

          Thanks Jerry


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.sandia.gov!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!usenet
From: Gerald Schmitt <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Alinco DX-70 MODS and IC-706 PRICE - I have both
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 95 08:05:16 mdt
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42742t$[e-mail]>
References: <423me2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: transitory1.lanl.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage


Hi Joe,

I tried to e-mail you but it bounced. Please e-mail
me and I will reply with a fax number. Or if you prefer
send specifics of the Alinco mods via e-mail.
Thanks 73 Jerry


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news3.digex.net!access5!jeffp
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Poretsky)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 2m HT - Is it a good by for the price?
Date: 1 Sep 1995 11:03:44 -0400
Organization: Express Access Online Communications USA: 800-969-9090
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <jeffp.809967697@access5>
References: <41jaih$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: access5.digex.net

[e-mail] (Ken Harrison) writes:

>[e-mail] ([e-mail]) wrote:
>> I would appreciate your comments on the Radio Shack 2m Handheld
>> transceiver.
>> I'm a rank beginner with my new tech licence, looking for my
>> first rig.

>Not to send you off the track of a HTX-202, but I've just heard about

The only thing I can add is that this radio is Roller-coaster proof.
It fell out of my pocket on a coaster, I found it 3 days later...
Still Working!

(No flames please, the radio had survived earlier rides, but the ride
broke in the middle {the lap bar came up})

JeffP
N3TOP


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!vax.sonoma.edu!harrisok
From: [e-mail] (Ken Harrison)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: STILL WANT: Gonset Com. IV manual/sch.
Date: 1 Sep 95 12:55:37 -0800
Organization: Sonoma State University
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vax.sonoma.edu
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.swap:42539 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16519 rec.radio.amateur.misc:85885

STILL LOOKING...

Hello.  I would like either the original or a photocopy of a manual
including schematic for the Gonset Communicator IV 2m AM rig.  Also,
I have a friend who is interested in the same for the Communicator III.

Please email me.

Thanks and 73--
Ken


--

__________________________________________________________________________
Ken Harrison   ---   [e-mail]   ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:06:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!psgrain!news.tek.com!gazette!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Ed Burress)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: My Cushcraft R7 won't tune up..........
Date: 1 Sep 1995 14:13:28 -0700
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville,  OR.
Lines: 13
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sepia.wv.tek.com


I can't get my R7 to tune up on the 20, 15, 12, or 10 meter bands.
It seems to work fine on 40, but not for the others.  I have had it
down several times, inspected connections, measured lengths according
to the instructions, verified that all connections were clean and bright,
and even used aluminox during the assembly to keep everything from
oxidizing.

Any clues or help out there?
Thanks,
Ed Burress
KC7GFX



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (MRI)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 2m HT -  Is it a good by for the price?
Date: 1 Sep 1995 14:41:19 GMT
Organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc., Ellicott City, MD USA
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <42762f$[e-mail]>
References: <41jaih$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clark.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]

Ken Harrison ([e-mail]) wrote:
: [e-mail] ([e-mail]) wrote:
: > I would appreciate your comments on the Radio Shack 2m Handheld
: > transceiver.
: > I'm a rank beginner with my new tech licence, looking for my
: > first rig.
:
: Not to send you off the track of a HTX-202, but I've just heard about
: the 4th radio in my county going on the blink.  Intermittent transmit.
: All the same problem.  The latest one is 3 months old.  Whenever used
: on 12 V. it is on a mobile 5/8 antenna.
:
: True, I don't know how many operators in my county have the HTX-202,
: exactly.  There are approximately 1300 or so amateurs that live in my
: county.  I'm sure they don't all own the HTX-202.  ;-)
:
: The ones that do work sound good.  The owners like them.  Just about
: every owner that I have talked to has the extended warranty.  (And it
: is apparently pretty good tha they do have it...)
:
: > Is it a good buy for $260?  I notice that they bundle in a few
: > options in the
: > price, that others don't.  Is there a better choice in that
: > price range?
:
: Considering the problems that I've heard with this HT, >if it were me<,
: I wouldn't purchase it without the extended warranty.  Figure another
: $40 or whatever it costs onto the price of your HT.  Now you're looking
: at around $300.  Is it worth that much?  In my opinion, no.
:
: Now if you get it for the sale price of around $190 + $40 warranty, you're
: looking at $230ish.  Yeah, maybe it is worth that to someone.  Did I
: say "Don't buy this radio without the warranty?"  Well, if I didn't say it,
: be sure you don't buy it without the warranty.
:
: Actually, I think Radio Shack ought to adjust the price of their radio
: so it includes the price of the 5 year warranty.  Of course, others may
: not think that way...  I'm just going by the track record I've seen from
: locals on this radio...
:
: I must add that Radio Shack has been very good to the locals in the
: customer service department.  They stand behind their product.  That is
: an important consideration when considering a purchase of most anything.
:
: It is reported that the HTX-202 is very good in a high RF environment.  It
: tends to not suffer from intermod interference.  This might be something
: to consider, too.
:
: All in all, I'm pretty neutral on the HTX-202.  I probably wouldn't buy
: one for myself, but I'm not in the market for a 2M HT, either.
:
: Contratulations on your new license and enjoy--
:
: 73,
: Ken
:
: --
:
: __________________________________________________________________________
: Ken Harrison   ---   [e-mail]   ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:
:
:


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!news
From: [e-mail] (Frank Scaraglino)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Found Radio in Road
Date: 1 Sep 1995 14:56:41 GMT
Organization: Ericsson North America Inc.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <4276v9$[e-mail]>
References: <4269jn$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: opus.rtp.ericsson.se

Do you have any markings on the radio? part num etc (AKA Ericsson GE Mobil Comm)
---
_______________________________________________________________________
Frank Scaraglino           [e-mail]       KA2FWC




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!news.dfw.net!news.dfw.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Lewis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu E-DC-12 Mobile adapter
Date: 1 Sep 1995 16:00:24 -0500
Organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <427s98$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dfw.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Has anyone been able to modify the Yaesu E-DC-12 Mobile adapter so that
it WILL NOT trickle charge the battery?

73!
Tom - AB5CK



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!main03!landisj
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham Store Total Stock Sellout
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 1 Sep 95 16:55:23 EST
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world
Organization: North American Drager - Telford, PA
Lines: 11

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (robert) writes:
> I sent an email request asking for the list to get sent to
> me via email.   I was told it was TOOO large.  HA!  We pass
> mega messages and files around on the net.  For some reason they
> want that sase?  Maybe to send other ads along with it??
> 73' s  Robert
Maybe it's not in machine readable form. Like - paper.
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!comp.vuw.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!cantva!misc329
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: info on icomr71
Date: 1 Sep 95 19:17:48 +1200
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <1995Sep1.191748@cantva>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cantva.canterbury.ac.nz

anyone got info for mods on a ic71 rex , i have one of these and believe there
are mods to allow improved performance around the bc band. also to allow pre
amp to be used below 1.6 mhz any info or pointers to me at
misc329@ canterbury.ac.nz
thanks in advanvce Robin



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!warp.cris.com!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Manual for Dentron GLA-1000B
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 19:57:25 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <427ojg$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: crc7.cris.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Need copy of the manual for a Dentron GLA-1000B amplifier.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:07 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.ak.net!thor.lostnet.org!cbrown
From: [e-mail] (Christopher E. Brown)
Subject: RCA MCA39AA11B Info needed
Message-ID: <917cb$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 20:45:05 GMT
Keywords: RCA AMP Transistor
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 34


Greeting all, I am looking for data on the final amp sections of an
RCA MCA38AA11B 155 mhz transciever.  I am turning it into a 2 meter
amp (give a bit of a boost to the HT) and am trying to find
safe drive levels etc...

The first trasnistor in the string is a

7794-1 7803
then a
7795-1 7815
then a
7796-1 7707
and finally a pair of
7797-1 7815

Would any of you have the specs on these avail?? I have tried to find
locally
but I do not have the books and hte local library is well short on anything
electronic related.

Also there is a small pin on the bottow of the amp near the power inputs
that just runs to the circut board just to one side of the transistors.  I
assume this is the bias supply, if so how many volts are needed for proper
operation?  I assume bias should be applied only when the  amp has input and
the output is connected to the feedl;ine via the relay.  Right??


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher E. Brown           WL7CLA           Lostnet Systems Administration

                          <[e-mail]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!news
From: [e-mail] (rod)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 8874 Eimac Tubes
Date: 1 Sep 1995 21:05:03 GMT
Organization: Frequency Spectrum
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <427shv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.147.154.71
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.4



       I have a pair of 8874 Eimac Grid Tubes. Brand New in Box.
    Sell the pair for $500.00

                     Call: 201-797-1227
                   E-Mail: [e-mail]

                                                  Rod
                                                   N2RVM




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.iadfw.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Floyd Adams)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Sub-audible tone generator
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 21:41:05 GMT
Organization: Internet America
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <427ukq$[e-mail]>
References: <427av7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dal02-10.ppp.iadfw.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9288 rec.radio.amateur.misc:85887 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16521

[e-mail] (Butch Magee) wrote:

>I have a Kenwood tr-7950 that does not have the optional tu-79 tone unit
>installed.  Kenwood says that option is no longer available.  does any
>one know of a way to build one?  The local repeaters are all using 100Hz
>tones, so thats the only one I will need.
>Any info about how to make one or how to modify another unit to work in
>the 7950 would be appreciated.

>Thanks,

>Butch KF5DE

Butch, It shouldn't be that hard to put in an aftermarket tone board.
The factory board will only let you set it up for three different
frequencies, if I remember correctly.  If you only need one frequency,
I would look at one of the miniature tone boards that Communications
Specialists sell.  They are available from a lot of the mail order
places.  They are very simple to hook up.  The original factory tone
board plugged into a small plug on the 7950.  My guess it was a B+,
GND and tone into the radio line.  Even if it is not, you can call
Communications Spealists and they will tell you where to connect their
boards on most radios.  I hope this helps....73's  Floyd  WD5ENJ



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!vtc.tacom.army.mil!usenet
From: Sean McCarthy <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Found Radio in Road
Date: 1 Sep 1995 22:11:19 GMT
Organization: Vetronics Technology Center, US Army TACOM, Warren, Michigan USA
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <4280e7$[e-mail]>
References: <425jo9$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wx8l.tacom.army.mil
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 32bit)

I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!

My long lost radio!

Please return to....

















Just kidding :-) :-)

Sean



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!netnews.lightside.com!user55.lightside.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Raymond J. Sarrio)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Looking fo a Lost Users Manual??
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 00:10:39 +0100
Organization: Raymond Sarrio Co.
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: user55.lightside.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Check out a books by Artsci Publications "The Lost Users Manual". It
covers most modern VHF and UHF Radio manuals. The book is discounted at
ham web site http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html. 73's Ray

--
Ray Sarrio Co.
http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.seanet.com!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTD SWAN350 Power suplly
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 00:58:17 GMT
Organization: Seanet Online Services, Seattle WA
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <428afg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rede2go.seanet.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

If anyone can helpme/tell me where i can get a power supply for my
swan 350 please email me  at [e-mail]
i would love to make use of it again thanks!



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (MHLINE)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB- Recording Eqpt
Date: 2 Sep 1995 01:35:20 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 6
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <428qeo$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (MHLINE)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I am interested in buying all kinds of pro-audio equipment
(mics,compressors, preamps, consosles etc) for my recording studio. I am a
serious buyer, and will pay your price for equipment that I can use.
Please contact me via e mail or phone me at 818-244-1909.
Thank you........ Mark



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:13 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!newsfeed.pitt.edu!dsinc!ub!freenet.buffalo.edu!bm783
From: [e-mail] (Lyle Rinckey)
Subject: WANTED IC-27H SCHEMATIC
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: freenet.buffalo.edu
Organization: Buffalo Free-Net
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 01:39:23 GMT
Lines: 2


Looking for schematic or copy of for the Icom 27H 2meter mobile.


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Gerald Phillips )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: DJ580T mod question
Date: 2 Sep 1995 01:53:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <428df5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-tf8-11.ix.netcom.com
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10315 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16549


I am atempting to do the extended receive mod. on my DJ580T.  I know
that you are supposed to cut the red wire, but I want to make sure
which wire you cut.  With the unit's display facing up and the bottom
removed you can see a "red" loop wire that is about the same size as
the blue one, and then there is a small "orange/red" wire at the top.
I believe I cut the larger loop which is red and not the smaller loop
that is orange/red.  If anyone can clear this up for me I would greatly
appreciate it.  Thanks and 73.

KE4MBD - Travis



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!uw-coco!nwfocus.wa.com!nwfocus1.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Gary P. Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706
Date: 2 Sep 1995 03:58:00 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <428ko8$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm3-ip20.halcyon.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.1

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Christopher Svenstedt) says:
>
>Hello All.
>
>Any good?
>
>Christopher
>
Not on the market quite yet.  Should ship about Sept 27 to 29 to dealers


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:16 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.sunbelt.net!udel!gatech!swrinde!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!eskimo!news
From: [e-mail] (Bill Turner)
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Organization: None
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14
References: <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 04:21:18 GMT
Lines: 27

What good is 6 meters, you ask...

Well, here's some thoughts:

Anything you can do on 6 can be done better on another band.  For instance:

1.  You can work DX on 6, but you can work lots more on the lower freq's.
2.  You can use a HT on 6, but the antennas are more manageable on 2 or
    70cm.
3.  You can get good gain from a moderate sized yagi, but again, more on the
    higher freq's for the same $$.
4.  If you like working repeaters or packet, etc, 2 meters has lots more
    activity.
5.  Contesting on 6 is for masochists.  Long hours, low pay.
6.  Groundwave coverage is better than 2 meters, but 10 meters is better
    yet.


Actually, there is one thing 6 is better at, and that's causing TVI.  It is
the unquestioned champ, always has been and as long as there's a channel 2,
always will be.

And yet, there are those of us who love it....  don't ask me why  :-)

73, Bill W7LZP (on 6 since 1957)
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.eng.convex.com!seas.smu.edu!!omega!rpo3352
From: rpo3352@omega (Paul Opitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: battery cover plate for HTX-202
Date: 2 Sep 1995 05:24:19 GMT
Organization: University of Texas Arlington
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <428pq4$[e-mail]>
References: <41nnas$[e-mail]> <41p0ga$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: omega.uta.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

In article <41nnas$[e-mail]>,
 <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I would like a battery connection cover plate for my HTX-202 because when
>I operate from external power I'm supposed to take the battery pack off
>but that leaves the battery connectors to possibly get damaged, any
>ideas?

Where did you get the idea that you are supposed to take off the battery
pack when operating from external power? There is no technical reason to
do so...

Paul Opitz
Radio Shack Publications


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!miwok!usenet
From: xyz@c (nobody)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need MOD for ICOM T21AT
Date: 2 Sep 1995 08:08:47 GMT
Organization: North Bay Network, Inc. news server - not responsible for content
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <4293ef$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: castles15.castles.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.3

Hello All;
I just got an ICOM T21AT 2M HT through a trade. The extended RX was done
by the keypad. How about the TX? Does anyone know of the TX mod for this
HT? BTW What is the full freqs coverage for this thing?

73 de John KC6VLG





From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!hbcsc274
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 replacement antenna
Date: 2 Sep 1995 09:14:02 GMT
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <42978q$[e-mail]>
References: <41vn9k$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.csun.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I also have a FT-530 and replaced the stock antenna with a Diamond RH77CA
rubber duck.  It is about 14.5" inches long from the base.
It is far superior than the stock antenna.  I paid $35 for it at the local
Ham Radio Outlet store.  I've seen these at hamfests for around $20.
Jerry Wang (KE6UUX)



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.globalone.net!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED 20MTR 30w LINEAR
Date: 2 Sep 1995 13:29:34 GMT
Organization: Global One, Inc
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <429m7u$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp9.global1.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

I AM LOOKING FOR A 20MTR 30-40w LINEAR WITH TR SWITCH, CAPABLE OF BEING DRIVEN WITH ABOUT 5 WATTS. JAG AA2LJ


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!news3.digex.net!digex.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Jim Stevenson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,misc.forsale.non-computer
Subject: FS: Electronic Test Equipment
Date: 2 Sep 1995 14:01:25 -0400
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <42a65l$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cnj.digex.net
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.swap:42530 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16512


        I have the following list of used test equipment for sale.
        All equipment has been tested and is in excellent operational
        and cosmetic condition. All equipment comes with a 30-day
        warranty. Shipping is not included in the prices shown. Please
        phone, fax, or email for more information.




        Ballantine 320 True RMS Voltmeter                            $ 60

        Ballantine 323-07 True RMS AC Voltmeter                      $150

        Fluke 335A Voltage Standard/Differential Voltmeter           $1100
                   /Null Detector

        Fluke 1120A IEEE-488 Translator                              $100

        Fluke 2020A Printer                                          $ 75
                Options: -003 GPIB

        Fluke 7260A Universal Counter/Timer                          $350

        General Radio 1390-B Random Noise Generator                  $ 60

        General Radio 1432J Decade Resistor                          $ 60

        Gray Instruments E-1144-B 5-Decade Resistor                  $ 50

        HP 403B AC Voltmeter                                         $ 70

        HP 431C Power Meter w/ 478A Thermistor Mount                 $250

        HP 461A Amplifier                                            $ 80

        HP 1610B Logic State Analyzer                                $250
                Data and clock probes are included.

        HP 1607A Logic State Analyzer                                $ 75
                The clock and data probes are not included.

        HP 1725A Oscilloscope                                        $450

        HP 3400A RMS Voltmeter                                       $150

        HP 3437A System Voltmeter                                    $200

        HP 3528A-60A Degausser                                       $ 40

        HP 5005A Signature Multimeter                                $300

        HP 5006A Signature Analyzer                                  $200

        HP 5150A Thermal Printer                                     $200
                Options: 001 HP-IB
                         002 BCD
                         004 Clock

        HP 5326B Timer/Counter/DVM                                   $100
                Options: 002  Remote Programming (Digital I/O)
                         003  Digital Recorder Interface

        HP 6130B Digital Voltage Source                              $100

        HP 6131B Digital Voltage Source                              $100

        HP 6260A DC Power Supply  0-10V, 0-100A                      $300

        HP 6260B DC Power Supply  0-10V, 0-100A                      $400

        HP 6282A DC Power Supply  0-10V, 0-10A                       $200

        HP 6940B Multiprogrammer                                     $100

        HP 7015B X-Y Recorder                                        $300

        HP 7221T 8-Pen Plotter                                       $500

        HP 7440A 8-Pen ColorPro Graphics Plotter                     $200

        HP 7470A 2-Pen Plotter, Serial Interface                     $100

        HP 7475A 6-Pen Plotter                                       $300

        HP 7550B 8-Pen Plotter                                       $400

        HP 8010A Pulse Generator                                     $200

        HP 8410A Network Analyzer                                    $120

        HP 8413A Phase-Gain Indicator                                $100

        HP 8614A Signal Generator                                    $450

        HP 8640B AM/FM Signal Generator                              $1700
                Options: 003 - Reverse Power Protection

        HP 8640B AM\FM Signal Generator                              $2700
                Options: 001 - Internal Audio Oscillator
                         002 - Internal Doubler (512-1024 MHz)

        HP 59301A Ascii-to-Parallel Converter                        $ 75

        HP 59307A Dual VHF Switch                                    $150

        HP 59401A Bus Analyzer                                       $450

        HP 59501B Isolated DAC / Power Supply Programmer             $100

        Racal-Dana 9514 Universal Timer/Counter                      $200

        Sony/Tektronix 308 Data Analyzer                             $500

        Systron-Donner 101 Pulse Generator                           $ 75

        Systron-Donner 115 Pulse Generator                           $100

        Tektronix 2B67 Time Base                                     $ 40

        Tektronix 5A18N Dual Trace Amplifier                         $ 75

        Tektronix 5B10N Single Sweep Time Base                       $100

        Tektronix 5B12N Dual Sweep Time Base                         $150

        Tektronix 7834 Fast Storage Oscilloscope Mainframe           $350




                               James L. Stevenson
                             3401 Sunny Slope Road
                       Bridgewater, New Jersey USA 08807
                    Phone: [phone]   Fax: [phone]
                         Email: [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (BillH33047)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2meter Handheld for newbie
Date: 2 Sep 1995 14:41:56 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 6
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42a8hk$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BillH33047)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Just recieved my no code licence in the mail and iam itching to buy a
radio. Most books recommend a 2m ht as a first radio. any reccomendations
out there. Ive been looking at the yaesu ft11 is this a good radio to
start out with? you can buy them for less than 300.00. It is small, and
has a backlit display. In major metro areas Iam in the San F. bay area do
you need 5watt versions of HT's.?


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (BillH33047)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HF tranciever vs reciever's for audio quality
Date: 2 Sep 1995 14:42:23 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 17
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42a8if$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BillH33047)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Iam new to Ham radio having just passed my no-code licence, and have
already begun learning the code. What got me interested in Ham was
listening to the Major shorwave broadcasts BBC etc. At one time I
fashioned buying a top of the line communications reciever DrakeR8,
Kenwood 5000 or Japan radio all of which are known for there good audio
quality as well as there dx ability. Now that Iam making my way into ham
radio Ive noticied that for example some of the kenwood transcievers are
priced not to much higher than the top of the line coommmunications
recievers. Ill always want to continue listening to the major SW
broadcasters. I like the what i think is the more balanced news
perspective of the bbc. Currently I have a grundig sat 700 reciever. Are
the audio quality most importantly listenability good on the mid priced
trancievers in comparison to the high end recievers? Will I miss Synch
detection commonly used on communications recievers? Are some trancievers
esp known for there audio quality-dynamic range? Thanks, iam betting there
is some hams who also listen to the majors and have been thru this
dillema.          Bill Hansen


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Sergei Kulyov)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Laptop 386
Date: 2 Sep 1995 14:43:11 -0400
Organization: The Greater Columbus FreeNet
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <42a8jv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


I posted this for friend. He's looking for the 386 Laptop
with at least 2 m RAM and monochrom monitor.

73! Sergei

AA8OT, UA3AP

--
*******************************************************************
Sergei Kulyov  "Serge" - AA8OT, UA3AP
The Ohio State University Amateur Radio Club
packet: aa8ot@w8cqk.#cmh.oh.us.na


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (John Amdor III )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: battery cover plate for HTX-202
Date: 2 Sep 1995 17:54:48 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <42a5p8$[e-mail]>
References: <41nnas$[e-mail]> <41p0ga$[e-mail]> <428pq4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sac4-09.ix.netcom.com

In <428pq4$[e-mail]> rpo3352@omega (Paul Opitz) writes:
>
>In article <41nnas$[e-mail]>,
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>I would like a battery connection cover plate for my HTX-202 because
when
>>I operate from external power I'm supposed to take the battery pack
off
>>but that leaves the battery connectors to possibly get damaged, any
>>ideas?
>
>Where did you get the idea that you are supposed to take off the
battery
>pack when operating from external power? There is no technical reason
to
>do so...
>
>Paul Opitz
>Radio Shack Publications

Paul, removing the battery on external power is about as old as the
HTX-202.

Apparently in the first few batches of '202s there was a problem with a
diode in the radio that would overheat and fry, so the recommendation
was to take the battery pack off to permit better cooling to the bottom
of the radio.

Don't know if it is true or not...I just slip an empty alkaline pack on
the bottom of the radio and go my merry way.  On the '202, there
shouldn't be power on the bottom of the radio, but I picked up the
habit with ICOM 02ATs and 03ATs, and some habits are hard to break...

My $0.02.

john
KD6MXL@KM6PX.#NOCAL.CA
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: W Henry amp price
Date: 2 Sep 1995 19:22:55 GMT
Organization: Real/Time Communications - Bob Gustwick and Associates
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <42aaug$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jake-6m.ip.realtime.net
X-Newsreader: AIR News 3.X (SPRY, Inc.)

I would like to get a current price and spec's on a HENRY 3K PREMIER amp, running a 3CX1200D7.
I haven't seen any mag articles lately so I have no idea what they go for new.
                                                                                       Thanks, Matt/KK5DR



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.monad.net!NewsWatcher!user
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 30' Tower 4 sale in N.H
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 21:01:29 -0400
Organization: MonadNet
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <cybertek-0209952101300001@204.97.18.179>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cybertek.top.monad.net

30' Tower 4 sale in N.H.

Located in south west New Hampshire

I have a free standing antenna tower for sale. It is in 4 sections. The
material is Galvanized steel. There is no rust. I do not know who the
manufacturer is but there is a part number stamped into each section. A
little research might reveal a manufacturer to those who might be
interested.

I am asking $70.00


 73/  Dale    N1KWE


internet [e-mail]  (weekends)
internet [e-mail]       (weekdays)
packet   [e-mail]
603-352-7996

***********************


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!news.tcst.com!dildog.lgc.com!news.sesqui.net!oitnews.harvard.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!ux4.cso.uiuc.edu!rustamov
From: Shavkat Rustamov <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham from Uzbekistan needs contacts
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 21:06:43 -0500
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ux4.cso.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


 RI8LAI .If anybody can help me to get informed about amature radio in
Illinois please email me .I am a student in the University of Illinois at
Urbna-Champaighn and rtied to find a ham club here but failed.
  Appreciate any assistance.

  73!

email:[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!cvillage.com!satriani
Subject: FS: Discount Cellular Accessories
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 95 21:51:52 EST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: CyberVillage BBS
Lines: 21

JR>I can supply accessories formost brands of cellular phones.
JR>Antennas, batteries, cases, chargers, mounts, hands free kits, etc..

JR>improve your portable phone's in car performance: add a car antenna and a
JR>coupler or adapter to connect your phone to the outside antenna.

JR>inquiries via e-mail please to: [e-mail]

JR>thanks,

JR>Mark Bergman
JR>Benchmark Communications

I have a DPC550 Micro T*A*C ..do you have any spare batteries?  And if
so, how much for one?

Jim
[e-mail]
--
  Message Sent Via CyberVillage BBS!  [phone]  Running Worldgroup V1.0!        For More Information, Send a Message to: [e-mail]===



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!psgrain!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!sun4nl!xs4all!usenet
From: "Michel Stoop (PE1OZA)" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TH-79A special functions
Date: 2 Sep 1995 23:24:23 GMT
Organization: MCS Electronics
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <42ap37$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: asd05-26.dial.xs4all.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 32bit)
To: [e-mail]

I know that there are some secret codes wich
you must enter with the keylock on.

The first person who gives me these codes will get
the 2 secret codes for the new Alinco DJ-G5

--
Regards, Michel
---
AMPRnet: [e-mail]
e-mail: [e-mail]
AX.25 BBS: PE1OZA@PI8DRE.#DRE.NLD.EU




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!globe.indirect.com!s12
From: [e-mail] (Barry Rose)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Date: 2 Sep 1995 23:52:19 GMT
Organization: Internet Direct, Inc.
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <42aqnj$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: s12.phxslip6.indirect.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3


> Why? Just more government regulation in our life. There
>may be no law that says they cannot sell Amateur equipment
>to anyone, but there is no law that says you HAVE to sell
>anyone Amateur equipment. Likewise there is no law that
>prevents the seller from having a policy of NOT selling
>to anyone without the proper license.
>
> N4DDS

I heard a story a few years ago from the manager of a local store
that is part of one of the major ham retail stores in the country.
Seems someone in a store back east refused to sell a transmitter to
an unlicensed person. That person sued and won.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:34 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!wanda.pond.com!kd3bj!shark.pond.com!robert
From: [e-mail] (Robert E. Garland)
Subject: Re: I need basic info on starting a High School Station
Sender: [e-mail] (News Posting Phantom User)
Nntp-Posting-Host: jupiter.kd3bj.ampr.org
Organization: The KD3BJ Usenet BBS
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <412fev$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 00:10:47 GMT
Lines: 28

[e-mail] (DJ Muzak) writes:

>I am looking to buy an AM or FM (pref FM) transmitter for my High School
>radio station which has up to now been closed circut.  I live near NYC
>(approx 30 minutes away) and I'm looking for a range of 2-5 miles.  I need
>info in terms of transmitter and antenna (suggestions of where to go).
>Also, what is the deal with licensing at this power (I have to tell the
>school board something because they are paying for it).  Any help would be
>greatly appreciated.

>Please respond via E-Mail
>Thanx again
>-Mike

Mike:  In your area it will be a major bona fide miracle if you can find
a frequency to operate on.  25 years ago I put a college station on the
air in a location just into PA along route 80.  At that time, we could
do it with 10 watts, which is the coverage you propose.  Since then, the
FCC has upped the stakes, and you get NO, NONE, NADA, ZIP, ZERO protection
from interference if you are less than 100 watts.  The norm appears to
be about 1 KW today.  I'm talking non-commercial FM here.  What you miight
try is something that schools out west did back then, and that is CableRadio.
See if you can get the local cable system to put a modulator on an unused
FM frequency in your area.  Of course, only those who have cable service can
get your signal.  It does solve a lot of problems, though.  You might post
to rec.radio.broadcast or rec.radio.noncommercial for more help.

Bob


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:35 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!milcom
From: [e-mail] (wayne roberts)
Subject: Re: X-tals supply house other then Jan Crystal ????
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: netcom online communications
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 00:34:57 GMT
Lines: 10
Sender: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]>, Charles V. Boehnlein <[e-mail]> wrote:
>I have a radio that needs a crystal. I had a very good and quick supply house address
>and phone number but have lost it. Can anyone recommend a good quick supplier ??

there is also Frequency Management, east coast is 800-477-8852
west coast is 800-800-9825.
They do all land mobile, um-1 channel elements, and even the <8mhz 5th
overtone ovinized um-5 crystals.  And if they screw it up they'll
replace it free of charge.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!btnet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Crystal Radio Information?
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 95 01:54:24 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <425lh5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16539 rec.radio.amateur.misc:85899

   gaspo <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Greetings all!
>Does anyone have any references (anything at all!) to Crystal
>Radio construction?  i know how they work, and built one way back
>when, but could use some schematics or instructions so we can build a
>couple in class!  The easier the procedure, the better!

Radio Shack sells a crystal AM radio kit for $6.99.  It doesn't get
any easier than that.  :)


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 95 01:55:16 GMT
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

In article <[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?

The FCC doesn't allow it.


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.service.uci.edu!news.intelenet.com!newshost.neptune.net!jds
From: [e-mail] (Jeffrey D. Stai)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 01:56:07 GMT
Organization: Neptune.Net (Neptune Consulting Group, Inc.)
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <42b1vn$[e-mail]>
References: <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203>
NNTP-Posting-Host: neptune.neptune.net

In <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203> [e-mail] (David Orbell) writes:

>  My interest in 6m is growing........thought I'd throw out a few questions
>going through my mind.

yeah, it's addicting... be careful!-)

>  Is a multi mode 6M rig worth the expense(when I don't have an HF rig
>that will take a 6M model) or do most just work FM?

I've started on FM, and had a very good time with it. A 6m FM-only will be
less expensive than an all-mode.

>Do most just work simplex, or work repeaters?

Well, I started with my Motorola Mitrek that I converted to 6m operation
mostly by retuning it (I still have to change the capacitors in the
pre-scaler, so it's still a little deaf). If you get the manual, there
are many "VHF Low Band" commercial radios available used for good prices
that are easy to convert (relatively ;-).

The Mitrek only does one channel (52.525 MHz FM) simplex, and that's
been fine. Worked as far as Montana from So Cal this past summer!

6m can be useful on repeaters, since (around here at least) intermod
is less of a problem.

>Do operaters on 6M  have problems  causing interference on the TV
>frequencies?(I've heard that used to be a problem)

Still is. Cable TV helps, but I still clobber my wife's TV downstairs, though
the TV next to the rig is fine (we'll be swapping them...;-).

You can avoid it completely by operating mobile. I have worked Oregon while
mobile, so don't let anyone tell you mobile won't do DX! (Also, that Montana
station was mobile...;-)


>Why do many 6M Rigs only operate on 10 watts?

Mostly TVI, I bet. There are lots of (older) rigs that do 100W. Also,
many of the new HF+6m allmodes do 100W on 6m (I think the Icom 736 does,
and I know the JST-245 does).

>I probably can't afford to get into 6M right away, but research dosen't
>cost too much!

Do two things:

Get: "Six Meters, The Magic Band" from Worldradio Books in Sacramento
California. Just do it. It's worth far more than you will pay for it
(which is something like US$12 !!!-).

Start looking for used 6m equipment. Most will be in fine shape. I found
a Drake TR-6 (100W CW/AM/SSB) for "cheap" at a local swap recently. I can
happen to you if you are prepared...

>Dave   VE3RRN
>Lakefield, Ontario

Good luck and just get on the band!!!

73!

jeff stai, ke6knf
Advanced Radio Workshop
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Dick DiVittorio)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Gonset Comm. IV man./schematic
Date: 3 Sep 1995 02:38:52 GMT
Organization: MagicNet, Inc.
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <42b4fs$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-19.magicnet.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:85892 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16532

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Ken Harrison) says:
>
>Hello.  I would like either the original or a photocopy of a manual
>including schematic for the Gonset Communicator IV 2m AM rig.  Also,
>I have a friend who is interested in the same for the Communicator III.
>
>Please email me.
>
>Thanks and 73--
>Ken
>
>
>--
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>Ken Harrison   ---   [e-mail]   ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
Hi Ken, I have a photo copy of the manuel you need. I will be happy to provide
you with a photo copy. I am not sure of the 4th generation quality however.
E-mail me with your address and I will let you know what the coping will cost
as well as the postage. By the way I am using this with my 6m AM Comm IV am it
seems to be OK... If you know of a proper manuel for this rig pse let me know.

73, Dick


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!psgrain!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!isnews.csc.calpoly.edu!usenet
From: Steve Miller KE6GPS <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: looking for cheap, BRICK 2m HT!
Date: 3 Sep 1995 02:55:40 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly Amateur Radio Club
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <42b5fc$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem010.offcampus.calpoly.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 16bit)

Well folks.. I'm in the market for a cool, 1970's good ol' BRICK
handheld!  If anyone's got one they might sell, drop me a line.. danka
shen!

Steve Miller KE6GPS
http://w6bhz.calpoly.edu/~smiller
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ralph.vnet.net!news
From: Terry McComb <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: KW MC-85 Mike Problem - Mod Available?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 03:04:17 GMT
Organization: Vnet Internet Access, Charlotte, NC -  [e-mail]
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <42b5vh$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.148.32.11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 16bit)

I have an MC-85 Kenwood Mike that appears to be causing a feedback
problem. I have placed a ferrite filter over the cord near the radio and
that seems to have eliminated quite a bit of the problem, but after
transmitting a while, it affects the relay in the radio & the relay
doesn't release immediately after releasing the PTT. Any ideas or mods
available to eliminate this problem? My old MC-50 dynamic mike causes no
problems. The radio is a Kenwood TS850S/AT. Thanks for any help. Terry
KD4GBO




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (LaraxSoft)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Mobile Amp
Date: 3 Sep 1995 03:33:08 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 3
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42blnk$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (LaraxSoft)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Mobile amp wanted for HF (2-30mhz) operation.  Must be solid state and run
on 12V.  Please respond to Hal, [e-mail] or Larry,
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: jeff Kloth <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.marketplace,rec.audio.pro,rec.music.makers.marketplace,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.video.production
Subject: Old German Vacuum Tube WTB
Date: 3 Sep 1995 03:55:45 GMT
Organization: Trackwork Orange, Inc.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <42b901$l2m$[e-mail]>
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.audio.marketplace:20031 rec.audio.pro:48034 rec.music.makers.marketplace:30605 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16538 rec.video.production:25536

VF-14 tube used in Germany 1940s and 50s.  Hard to find.  Used or
in box.  I need it!!!!
Call collect: Jeff 312-644-4300 Days  FAX [phone]

--
JPK


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!cello.gina.calstate.edu!swrl33.gina.slip.csu.net!rhought
From: Robert D Houghton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu FT-8500 Mods anyone?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 03:56:05 GMT
Organization: Physics teacher/Science Chairman
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42b90l$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.150.1.33
X-UserAgent: 1.1
X-XXMessage-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-XXDate: Sat, 2 Sep 95 04:00:57 GMT

Just purchased a new Yeasu FT-8500 dual band mobile. Lots of menu
programmable features. There *must* be wonderful undocumented features.
Have any of you discovered any or can you point me to a FAQ or mod file.
I checked the mod files at oak.oakland.edu but there is no file yet for
this tranceiver.
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|
|                              |  AMSAT member #26148                    |
| Robert D. Houghton           |  digital satellites: KC6LVG@PACSAT      |
| Science Department Chairman  |  Packet radio: kc6lvg@k6unq.#cas.na     |
| John A. Rowland High School  |  Other internet:                        |
| Rowland Heights, CA 91748    |    [e-mail]                     |
|                              |    [e-mail]    |
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (jdb )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 04:42:21 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <42bbnd$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bir-al1-07.ix.netcom.com

In <42aqnj$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Barry Rose)
writes:
>
>
>> Why? Just more government regulation in our life. There
>>may be no law that says they cannot sell Amateur equipment
>>to anyone, but there is no law that says you HAVE to sell
>>anyone Amateur equipment. Likewise there is no law that
>>prevents the seller from having a policy of NOT selling
>>to anyone without the proper license.
>>
>> N4DDS
>
>I heard a story a few years ago from the manager of a local store
>that is part of one of the major ham retail stores in the country.
>Seems someone in a store back east refused to sell a transmitter to
>an unlicensed person. That person sued and won.
>


 I used to be a 50% owner of a Ham Radio store in Tennessee.
We had a clearly posted store policy that was in plain sight.

it was simple...

..We do not sell Amateur Radio equipment capable of transmitting
   to anyone who does not hold a valid Amateur Radio License.

 Now we did not go so far as to say you cannot but a 2M FM rig
because you only have a Novice ticket..No..If you held a license you
could buy anything in the store...no license...receiving gear only.
We were sued by two people who wanted to buy 440 HT's....They
lost.
I don't know which court that person won in, but I assure
you have no legal rights (except for equal housing laws) that can force
anyone to sell anything to you if they do not want to....


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:47 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!eskimo!localhost
From: [e-mail] (Bill Turner)
Subject: Re: Info needed on AN/VRC-18 Radio Set
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
References: <42b5vh$[e-mail]> <42bcn1$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 06:08:21 GMT
Lines: 45

In article <42bcn1$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (John B. Lawrence ) wrote:
>Fair Radio sells the VRC-18 set. It consists of an RT-68/GRC
>transceiver, R-110 Reciever, PP-112 & 282 24VDC power supplies, mic,
>two headsets, speaker, mast base, antenna, cables, manuals, etc.Is it a
>good system? They stste it has been Government Reconditioned.
>
>According to the item description in the catalog it is continuosly
>tuneable or in 100khz steps frpm 38 - 54.9mhz. Is the transceiver
>section (RT-68/GRC) continuosly tunable? I'm looking fo a good, cheap
>and rugged rig to get on 6m with. They sell the set for $250.00 plus
>shipping.
>
>They also sell just the RT-68/GRC (used--not reconditioned) transceiver
>for $75.00 (may be better deal in the long run considering shipping
>weight is only 42lbs. on the RT and 185lbs. for the set??? [I live in
>CA]).
>
>Any opinions/problems/suggestions?
>
>Thanks!!
>
>John
>KE6TGN
Here's a couple of questions I'd as Fair Radio:

1.  Does it do FM?
2.  If so, does it do split?  If not, it's no good for repeaters.
3.  What deviation?  If it's too high on transmit, you can turn the mike gain
    down, but if it's too high on receive (i.f. bandwidth) you're stuck.
3.  If it does SSB (not likely), how stable is the vfo?
4.  If it doesn't do either of the above, that only leaves you with AM, which
    will work, but you're really asking for TVI problems on six with AM if
     you're in a channel 2 area.

The net result is that if it's an FM-only rig (most likely), you'd be better
off for the price with an Azden or similar rig designed for ham radio.
They're a little more than $250, but in the long run, I think you'd be
happier.  And they only weigh a pound or two, not 185!!

Good luck.


73, Bill W7LZP
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.sas.ab.ca!fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca!dna
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Building Transmitter
Date: 3 Sep 1995 07:49:55 GMT
Organization: Edmonton Freenet, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <42bmn3$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2.3]

Does anyone out there have any plans for building a low cost shortwave
transmitter?  If you do, please email it to...

Darren                          email: [e-mail]

--




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!news-mail-gateway
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help FT530 for 9k6 Mods.
Date: 3 Sep 95 08:03:43 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: [e-mail]


Hello!

Y need modifications for FT530 in 9600 Baunds.
Please send a mail for: [e-mail]

Tanks in advanced!

73/s Claudio

73. Claudio

Mailbox : PY3DZZ @ PY3DZZ.RS.BRA.SA
AMPRNet : [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!peach.epix.net!kknapp
From: Ken Knapp <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Found Radio in Road
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 08:39:15 -0400
Organization: epix.net
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <425jo9$[e-mail]> <4280e7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: peach.epix.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <4280e7$[e-mail]>

REALLY! Gee, was my wallet there with it?

:)

Ken


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (RWHam)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: NEED INFO on Alinco DR600
Date: 3 Sep 1995 09:43:00 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 4
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42cbd4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RWHam)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Does anyone know how to increase the time delay between keydown and first
tone (its not long enough) when operating the Alinco DR-600 on (DTMF) DSQ?
How about decreasing the DTMF sequence tone transmission rate (its too
fast)? Thanks for any info.........Robert


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.eunet.fi!vekkula.pcuf.fi!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Harri Ronkko)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need MOD For Kenwood Tm-451A/E
Date: 3 Sep 1995 12:40:43 GMT
Organization: PC-k{ytt{j{t ry - The PC Users of Finland
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <42c7ob$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pcuf.fi


 If someone have a modification to kenwood TM-451A/E can he send it to me via
 email. Thanks in advance
 73's de Harri


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:53 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mv!wd1v.mv.com!user
From: [e-mail] (John Seney)
Subject: Macintosh Ham Radio Software
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: wd1v.mv.com
Sender: [e-mail] (System Administrator)
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 13:14:56 GMT
Lines: 44


Mac Computers + Hams + Radios =

      Macnet Software

on 10 New Disks just $30.00

(Each Stuffed with the Latest Self Extracting
   Public Domain Versions - 800k Disk)
Shipped First Class Mail - Ppd!

Macnet 1    Logs + Demos
Macnet 2    DX  + Contest
Macnet 3    Educ + Rem Ctrl
Macnet 4    Astro + FAX
Macnet 5    Pkt Terminals +
Macnet 6    Net/Mac TCP/IP +FAQ
Macnet 7    Novice Test + (Or the Ham Test of Your Choice)
Macnet 8    Sat Trackers + Dove
Macnet 9    C/C++ Programming Tutors
Macnet 10   Macnet Roster ("Whos Who" of Hams w/ Macs)

Send Check or Money Order - Outside USA Send $40.00
All Orders Shipped within 48 Hours


73,


\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
John D. Seney, WD1V                Internet:      [e-mail]
144 Pepperidge Drive        America On Line:        [e-mail]
Manchester, NH 03103-6150         AX.25 Pkt: [e-mail]
(H) 603-668-1096                   Ampernet:    [e-mail]
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
LeCroy Sales Engineering -  Maine, New Hampshire, and Northeastern
                            Massachusetts
(O) 800-553-2769      (F) 603-627-1623    (P) 800-SKYPAGE #5956779

   All opinions are my own, including Digital Storage Scope.FAQ

 To obtain the latest copy automatically, simply send me an EMAIL
       with "subscribe scope.faq" in the subject field.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: ANDREW JENTIS <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Out of band RX on FT-51R
Date: 3 Sep 1995 13:17:18 GMT
Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <42c9su$[e-mail]>
References: <424ugf$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: andrewj.earthlink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1b3 (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]

please let me know if the receive mod using the software works. will
it receive up to 512 mhz and how to change the software? andy n6xkn



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: ANDREW JENTIS <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu 51r vs Icom W31
Date: 3 Sep 1995 13:20:41 GMT
Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc.
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <42ca39$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: andrewj.earthlink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1b3 (Windows; I; 16bit)

I am thinking of purchasing one of the listed HT's. Any comments? how is
audio on each? is the programable software for the 51R a good purchase?

andy



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:57 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mv!wd1v.mv.com!user
From: [e-mail] (John Seney)
Subject: Ham Radio Test Simulators - Mac
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: wd1v.mv.com
Sender: [e-mail] (System Administrator)
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 13:24:46 GMT
Lines: 76

               FREE - NEW Macintosh HAM TEST SIMULATORS

Studying for a ham test and have access to an Mac?

Upgrade Fast! Simulate the test and get S T I M U L A T E D!

Scores of 90% or > even get applause!


The new Macintosh Ham Test Simulators are HERE (and there if you can FTP)!

              o Novice Ham Test 5.0 SA.sea
              o Technician Ham Test 5.0 SA.sea
              o General Ham Test 5.0 SA.sea
              o Advanced Ham Test 5.1 SA.sea
              o Extra Ham Test 5.0 SA.sea

The latest version "5" feature:

    HyperCard 2.3 as a stand-alone application (SA) eliminating
    your need to have HyperCard. All you need is a Mac with 4
    Meg of memory and version System 7 or greater.

    Each version "5" Ham Test Simulator has the latest questions
    as prepared by the Question Pool Committee.

    Each version "5" Ham Test Simulator is FREE OF CHARGE and work the
    same way as the originals did (written by Diana, KC1SP).

You may obtain a version "5" Ham Test Simulator by mailing me a *FORMATTED
disk (1 per test) and include a Self Addressed and Stamped disk mailer for
the return.

Each version "5" Ham Test Simulator is also bundled with a shareware CW
program called MacMorse 1.4 written by Doug, WB0EON.

Also included in the version "5" collection are text files that relate an
interesting variety of ideas about the best way to study CW and prepare
for tests.

Or warm your phone line and get JUST the tests:

           America On Line - Macintosh Ham Radio Section

or:

ftp://oak.oakland.edu//pub3/hamradio/mac/theory-and-morse/AdvancedHamTest.sea.bin
(Aug 30th)
ftp://oak.oakland.edu//pub3/hamradio/mac/theory-and-morse/ExtraHamTest.sea.bin
ftp://oak.oakland.edu//pub3/hamradio/mac/theory-and-morse/GeneralHamTest.sea.bin
ftp://oak.oakland.edu//pub3/hamradio/mac/theory-and-morse/NoviceHamTest.sea.bin
ftp://oak.oakland.edu//pub3/hamradio/mac/theory-and-morse/TechnicianHamTest.sea.bin

Your comments and suggestions for future versions are always welcome. Stay
in touch
and good luck with YOUR next test!


73,


\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
John D. Seney, WD1V                Internet:      [e-mail]
144 Pepperidge Drive        America On Line:        [e-mail]
Manchester, NH 03103-6150         AX.25 Pkt: [e-mail]
(H) 603-668-1096                   Ampernet:    [e-mail]
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
LeCroy Sales Engineering -  Maine, New Hampshire, and Northeastern
                            Massachusetts
(O) 800-553-2769      (F) 603-627-1623    (P) 800-SKYPAGE #5956779

   All opinions are my own, including Digital Storage Scope.FAQ

 To obtain the latest copy automatically, simply send me an EMAIL
       with "subscribe scope.faq" in the subject field.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (LelandH105)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Motorola VHF Micor radios
Date: 3 Sep 1995 13:35:25 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 19
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42cp0t$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (LelandH105)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

For Sale:   Motorola Micor mobile radios

Brief description:

These are 110 watt Motorola Micor mobile radio systems, 12 channels, made
to be mounted in the trunk with a remote control head, speaker and mic in
the front of the
vehicle.

They are available bare radio alone, or with the control cable, head, mic,
speaker, scanner head, and CTCSS select head.

They are in the 150.8 162.0 Mhz. band segment. They can be converted to
Amateur 2 meter radio use by changing crystals and a little tuning.

Asking $50 each,  including accessories, you pay shipping. Discounts for
large volumes are possible.

For further info please e-mail [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:07:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: MICHELS BERTRAND <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SUPER SMALL RADIO CONTROL SYSTEMS
Date: 3 Sep 1995 15:08:18 GMT
Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <42cgd2$l3m$[e-mail]>
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10313 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16546

I al building SUPER SMALL RADIOCONTROL ELECTRIC AIRPLANES (bellow
4 oz, with 3 proportional chanels). My latest airplane weight 3
oz 1/2, use 4 cells Ni-CD 110 mA, a FM 4 chanel proportional
Receiver (6 grammes), 2 servos of 6 grammes (hand built in the
USA), and a 3 grammes Electronic throttle (German)... all this is
MUCH smaller then the CANNON RC System.

I am trying to built now a 2 oz Electric airplane, and for this I
need even smaller RC systems, runing under less than 5 volts.

Do you know somebody manufacturing :

- SUPER SUPER small RC Systems (Using servos or actuators, but in
all cases PROPORTIONAL)
- SUPER SMALL Electric DC motors with resonable efficiency under
1 or 2 Cells (1 to 2 volts !!). Some Micro COBALT ??


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (John Schwartzberg)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TK series Land Mobile Radios
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 15:59:29 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <42cja0$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-den11-11.ix.netcom.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

I'm looking for some information on Kenwood TK-701 S-1 and TK-801 S-1
16 channel commercial radios.  Specifically, I have the following
questions:

1.  What is the range of frequencies that either model's synthesizers
will allow programming and will lock?

2.  Phase modulation or frequency modulation?

3.  Power output?

4.  These are prom programmable.  Is the programming software
available?  (I'll have the prom burner)

5.  Suitable for high speed data (9600 baud packet)?

6.  Suitable for point to point linking?

7.  Anyone got a manual for either/both available for review or
purchase?


Thanks in advance for the help.  E-mail responses to
[e-mail].

John
N0GII



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!pipeline!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!main03!landisj
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: HTX100 schem or transverter mods??
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 3 Sep 95 17:07:08 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: North American Drager - Telford, PA
Lines: 10
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16579 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9312

Hi,
Does anyone have a schematic for the Radio Shack HTX100 10 meter rig,
or has anyone added seperate low-level transmit and recieve?
I'd like to use mine for a 28mhz tunable if for a DEM 432 mhz IF transverter.

Thanks,
Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 17:12:20 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 21
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42d5nk$[e-mail]>
References: <42bbnd$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42bbnd$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (jdb )
writes:

>We do not sell Amateur Radio equipment capable of transmitting
>   to anyone who does not hold a valid Amateur Radio License.
>
>We were sued by two people who wanted to buy 440 HT's....They
>lost.
>I don't know which court that person won in, but I assure
>you have no legal rights (except for equal housing laws) that can force
>anyone to sell anything to you if they do not want to....
>
Good policy, I like it.  This doesn't come without a "but" however.  I
don't disagree with the stores policy, I just wonder what would happen if
Mrs. X (unlicensed) comes in to buy a goodie for Mr. X. (wa4***).  Lost
sale?  As far as the courts go, I would be willing to bet the house that
if a "Native American, Afro-hispanic - transgendered lesbian " strolled in
the store and was refused a sale, he, she or it and the planeload of
lawyers would end up owning the store, your house, your car, and other
things you don't even poses yet.  Scary thought.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (EKeib)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: cat interface pgm for yaesu frg9600
Date: 3 Sep 1995 17:17:16 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 3
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42d60s$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (EKeib)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

does anyone have programs that will run an frg 9600 receiver with the
fif232c
converter ?


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!csulb.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: [e-mail] (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG)
Subject: TS 440 advice on L3 (IF board)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 30
Date: 3 Sep 95 20:50:04 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment

I reinstalled my IRCI 2.1 kHz filter in the 455 kHz line and found that
my S meter read much lower than before.  (It tracked my 940 pretty
well before, was now way down from that.)  Can't figure out why the
change, only removed the IF board and soldered in the 455 kHz filter,
but there it was.

Anyway, I went to my Kenwood service manual to realign the S meter as
best as I could, no instruments here.  I reset zero, and reset the S9
adjustment to track the 940 meter, but they also have you set L3
(coupling the IF line between 8.8 MHz IF and 455 kHz IF) for "S1" .
I found that the slug in my L3 was almost falling out of the can for
some reason, though it seems tight as far as screwing it in and out.
Can't figure that one out, but, I screwed the slug back in to see
how it affected things, and it seems to affect the gain in the IF line.
I screwed it way down in and got a lot more gain, of course the S meter
read higher now.  I reset the other adjustments VR1 and VR2 for
similar readings to my 940.  No big deal on accuracy here, I know I
can't expect much.

However, my big question is: anyone have a 440 and can you tell me where
the slug seems to be in your L3 on the IF board?  (Just above the SSB
optional filter slot). Also, any technicians know how important this
adjustment is?  Am I cranking up the gain too much by tightening this
transformer without the proper instruments?  (Should get "S1" for
an RF signal on 20 meters in USB of 8db/u.)

Any help?

Clark
WA3JPG


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!intac!almach5
From: [e-mail] (Alan Machbitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: For sale: Kenwood TS450S/AT
Date: 3 Sep 1995 20:56:16 GMT
Organization: INTAC Access Corportation - An Internet Service Provider
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <42d4pg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nile.intac.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.bctel.net!news.island.net!ham!rsmits
From: [e-mail] (Robert Smits)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HELP: Heatkit Parts' Informations
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 21:32:00 PST
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Distribution: world
Organization: The Curmudgeon's Cottage
X-Newsreader: Rnf 0.79b6
Lines: 33

[e-mail] (Wasmir Robeves) writes:

>Hello. We are looking for informations regarding the following parts for one of
>my friends' radio:
>
>             Heatkit Part No.        Manufacturer          Mfg. Part No
>1. RL1     PN-69-40           Potter & Brumfield        MH8054-1
>2. RL2     PN-69-17           Potter & Brumfield        MH1097-1
>3. T1       #54-182 (Power Transformer)
>
>*** Part Nos. 1 and 2 are for Heatkit Model SB-401 Transmitter
>*** Part No. 3 is for Heatkit Model SB-620 Scanalyzer
>
>We wish to know where we can purchase those listed above and if
>you can provide the price will be great.
>

Here's a phone number that appeared on the net for Heathkit Parts....


The Heathkit parts number is 616-925-5899.

And here's an address...

Heath Replacement Parts
455 Riverview Drive
Benton Harbor, MI  49022




--
[e-mail] (Robert Smits, VE7HS)


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!news
From: "Alan K. Adamson" <ne1h>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ACC source code?
Date: 3 Sep 1995 21:38:30 GMT
Organization: Amateur Radio Gateway WA4MEI, Chamblee, GA
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <42d78m$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tornado.ne1h.radio.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; Linux 1.3.21 i486)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Help,

I need the site for the ACC source, Can someone post it.

Thanks,
Alan Adamson
NE1H
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!vivanews.vivanet.com!mulveyr
From: [e-mail] (Rich Mulvey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Any info on pirat
Date: 3 Sep 1995 21:39:14 GMT
Organization: Mulvey
Lines: 27
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42d7a2$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip157.vivanet.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Clint Bradford ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Subject: WANTED: Any info on pirate radio station

: >>I'd like to start my own pirate radio station.
: >>What equip. do I use, or need.
: >>Any info would be very appreciated.
: >>Chad Mears

: Contact this group in writing:

: Federal Communications Commission
: Washington, DC 20554

: Be sure that your correspondence clearly identifies how the FCC may
: reach you for further information, and that the matter you are addressing
: is understandable and accurate.

   You also forgot to mention that the original poster should specify
the frequencies and broadcast schedule that he wishes to use, so that
the FCC can evaluate the quality of his transmissions.


---
Rich Mulvey, N2VDS                                        Rochester, NY   USA
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
n2vds@wb2psi.#wny.ny.us


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:09 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!eskimo!news
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Liang)
Subject: Re: 2m/70cm Handheld Reccomendations ?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Reply-To: mail.eskimo.com
Organization: Blank
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14
References: <41qitj$[e-mail]> <41v1kq$[e-mail]> <422duf$[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 22:23:06 GMT
Lines: 51

In article <422duf$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
says...
>
>David M. Comer wrote:
>
>..looking to purchase an 2m/70cm handheld.
>
>To which Walt Johnson replied:
>
>> ... My rationale [for getting a W31]:
>>
>>1) ... lighted keypad
>>2) ... fifty memories for each band
>>3) ... keypad
>>4) ... accessories
>
>I got a 31 for the same reasons as Walt (I don't know him, he works
>for another division of Loral).
>
>I also got a IC-2341H for use as a local repeater in the parking lot
>outside of our building.  The building has this mylar on the windows
>and blocks most of the radio signals (but not the heat during the
>summer) :-(  Having this combo allows me to talk to my wife who works
>about 25 miles away.  We're both using a repeater 1/2 way in between.
>
>I have really come to love the 31.  It's been in the seat of my dirt
>bike (wrapped in a towel and plastic baggie), with the ICOM heaset
>mike (don't remember the model number).  It's also been on the back
>of my bicycle, with it's rubber duckie antenna.  This last one got
>us out of a jamb, when we were lost on a camping trip.  My wife was
>able to talk us back into camp, using tall ridges/trees.
>
>It's been used by the local sherrif when we were camping and there
>were some kids lost, (he's studying to become a ham too now).
>
>It had the mods done for out-of-band receive (haven't done the
>transmit yet).  Can receive 50Mhz - 700.95Mhz.
>
>It's pretty easy to use, and seems to fit the bill just fine.
>
>+====================================================================+
>|    [e-mail] (KB6VMQ)   | Happily married with 2 Kids!  -+-|
>|   Loral doesn't have a single   |  A newbie Quinnatic (DQMW)     | |
>|  thing to do with my opinions.  | HAM, Dirtbikes, Kids, Camping  | |
>| ...you mean this isn't working? |    K-LOVE - 100.9/99.3/91.9 FM   |
>+---------------------------------+----------------------------------+
>
>I bought an ICOM IC-W2A dual band.  It works according to
specifications, but the buttons prove too small for my fingers.  It was
my first handheld.  Now I know better!



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (jdb )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Any info on pirate radio station
Date: 3 Sep 1995 23:24:57 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <42ddg9$[e-mail]>
References: <4204ao$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bir-al1-18.ix.netcom.com

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail]
(Clinton Peebles) writes:
>
>
>L>I'd like to start my own pirate radio station.
>L>What equip. do I use, or need.
>L>Any info would be very appreciated.
>
>I have a RAMSEY FM-10A that works not too bad.  Panaxis has a better
>one out.  There's also a pirate radio newsgroup, alt.radio.pirate,
>that you can check into.
>

 If you have a Nomex suit, I suggest you find it and put it on...
As I would imagine you can look forward to being flamed beyond
belief.........

  N4DDS




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!intac!almach5
From: [e-mail] (Alan Machbitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TS450S/AT for sale
Date: 3 Sep 1995 23:26:14 GMT
Organization: INTAC Access Corportation - An Internet Service Provider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42ddim$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nile.intac.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


FS: Kenwood TS450S/AT

Kenwood TS450S/AT all mode (am, fm, cw, ssb, fsk), HF (all HF bands,
including
all WARC bands) rig for sale. Perfect/mint condition- no stains,
scratches, dents, etc. Standard
features and accessories include:
built in antenna tuner, up/down microphone, manual, original box.  The
radio has 100 memories,
split frequency ability,  IF shift, notch filter, QSK cw breakin, VOX
control, variable power output,
dual digital VFO, fast/slow AGC, speech processor, and more.  I would
like to get
$985 for it or best offer.    Please email almach5 if you are
interested.      Thanks....
73!   Alan



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TH-79A special functions
Date: 3 Sep 1995 23:47:52 GMT
Organization: CompuServe HamNet
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <42der8$lub$[e-mail]>

And what do the secret codes for the Alinco G5 do?

                     -Jeff


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: jeff Kloth <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.marketplace,rec.audio.pro,rec.music.makers.marketplace,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.video.production
Subject: F.S. Lexicon 1200C Time Compression
Date: 3 Sep 1995 23:59:16 GMT
Organization: Trackwork Orange, Inc.
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42dfgk$qvl$[e-mail]>
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.audio.marketplace:20081 rec.audio.pro:48119 rec.music.makers.marketplace:30648 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16568 rec.video.production:25577

Unit is mint condition.  Low use.  Add tach and time compress in
real-time!    $2150.00+ sh (Chicago)

Jeff 312-644-4300 days

--
JPK


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Mr. Big One)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Icom IC-901A 2m/440 dual band radio
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 1995 02:11:19 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <42dcn0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darkside.async.vt.edu
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Icom IC-901A 2m/440 dual band radio
-----------------------------------------------------

This is the Icom model the features a remote face so it is easy to
mount in a car.  You attach a single cable to the radio.  On the
radio, you have connections for:

2 speakers (main and sub channels)
Mic
440 antenna (N-connector)
2m antenna (PL-259 connector)
12V power

I am included a hand-held DTMF mic with up/down control.

PL encode/decode on both bands

This radio does it all.  2 VFO's for 2m/440 simitanious display.
(you can use 2 speakers, one for 2m and one for 440, or hook
up a signle speaker for both) 20 memory channels, lighted
buttons/display, every setting can be configured, etc.

This radio is in beatiful condition, and never used in a car
(I used it in my shack with a 12V PS)

Debts are piling up and I have to sell off my shack. Please make
me any offer.

Please make me any offers or questions via email.  I do not get a
chance to read this newsgroup too often. Thanks!

Ken, KD4FJR




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!lucky.innet.com!smithj
From: [e-mail] (Jim Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 95 04:31:21 GMT
Organization: Internet Network Corporation
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <42dush$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tex-59.innet.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3

In article <[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?
>
Like he said, "The FCC...

I feel wordy, so let's blather on a bit...

The Class D (Citizens Band) Radio Service was conceived as a personal service,
strictly local. I can remember when back in the 23 channel days there were
specific channels set aside for business, personal, mobile-mobile, and
mobile-base communications. The technical state of the art did not permit
close-spaced input/output pairs in such a small freq spectrum, so no
provisions were made for it.

Another factor in it was the occaisional skip conditions that occurred. With
the Class D range and power limitations, a repeater would have produced
widespread interference across a wide area when the band opened.

With the channel use restrictions, spectrum width, and intended use all taken
into account, there simply was no reason to allow it, nor any purpose in
allowing it.

If you needed the services of a repeater, you went to the commercial radio
spectrum, or GMRS ( at least I think the allowed repeaters there).

Hope this is a better answer...

Jim (I got my ticket in ~'78) Smith  N8AVX


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (bob cocco )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: transformer help
Date: 4 Sep 1995 04:58:14 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <42e116$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-pit1-11.ix.netcom.com

I have a ft 101 b that went up in smoke , the transformer fryed . Is
there a place that rewinds them ?  Does someone have a replacement that
they wish to part with. Tnx in advance.

                              73  de  Bob  N3LSS


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (John B. Lawrence )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Change WBFM to NBFM????
Date: 4 Sep 1995 07:15:33 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <42e92l$[e-mail]>
References: <429vje$[e-mail]> <42e0s3$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bak-ca1-23.ix.netcom.com
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9313 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16585 rec.radio.amateur.misc:85939

I may purchase a military surplus RT-68/GRC 38 - 54.9mhz FM
transceiver. It uses wide-band FM. Any way to change it to narrow-band
FM? If so, how? I plan to use it for 6m operation.

Thanks

John
KE6TGN


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!tuegate.tue.nl!turtle.stack.urc.tue.nl!esrac
From: [e-mail] (ESRAC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FALSE SWR reading on MFJ 962 TUNER ?
Date: 4 Sep 1995 09:14:47 GMT
Organization: Student Association Stack, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <42eg27$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: turtle.stack.urc.tue.nl
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

By accident I stumbled accross something strange with my MFJ 962 1.5 kW
TUNER. The tuner has a cross needle indicator for FORWARD and REFLECTED
power. When tuning an antenna for for minimum SWR the reflected power needle
should dip at 0 Watt. This works just fine even when a random lenght of wire
is used as a antenna.

Now what did I discover...?

Setup: TS850S <--> AL811A amplifier <--> YS60 SWR/POWER meter <--> MFJ 962

<--> 2 el. Cubical QUAD for 5 bands.

SWR measured with a SWR analyser from MFJ at the antenna showed 1.1:1 50 Ohm
on 17 and 20 meters.

SWR on 15 meters was about 1.5:1

Watching the cross-needles of the MFJ I tuned the QUAD on 15 meters to 'no
reflected power'. The SWR indicator on the TS850S showed about 1.7:1 .
Checking the SWR on the YS60 showed the same 1.7:1 !!!...??? Then I only
watched the YS60 meter and tuned with the MFJ for minimum SWR on the YS60.
The SWR on the TS850 then also diped at 1.1:1.
The MFJ showed about 2:1 SWR. Tuning happened with 50 Watts. There was a
pronounced DIP on the YS60 reading while the cross needle of the MFJ did NOT
dip at all (it only dips at 0 reflected power)

I suspect that either the measuring circuitry of the MFJ is faulty or simply
incorrect designed. I would appreciate any comments on my observations.


Best wishes and 73 de Aurelio pa3ezl/aa2wh
[e-mail]  or [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Any info on pirat
Date: 4 Sep 1995 09:33:47 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 22
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42ev7r$[e-mail]>
References: <42d7a2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42d7a2$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Rich Mulvey) writes:

>: Be sure that your correspondence clearly identifies how the FCC may
>: reach you for further information, and that the matter you are
addressing
>: is understandable and accurate.
>
>   You also forgot to mention that the original poster should specify
>the frequencies and broadcast schedule that he wishes to use, so that
>the FCC can evaluate the quality of his transmissions.
>
>
Hey, one more Idea! (to the original poster), go buy a topo map, and
clearly mark on the map, in bold red permanant marker, where the
transmiter, studio, and antenna will be.  This will surely speed up the
"process".  This will aid the monitoring & signal quality patrol divisions
to effectively null out any interference, thereby enabling a better
"quatlity of transmission" evaluation.  I can't think of any other task
that would help with the "proof of perfomance" and THD tests.  You
certainly don't need some pesky multi-KW foriegn broadcast staion fouling
up the test activity.


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!psgrain!iafrica.com!ticsa.com!cstatd.cstat.co.za!usenet
From: [e-mail] (CMS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HELP SAVE LIVES - Info wanted
Date: 4 Sep 1995 10:19:33 GMT
Organization: CMS
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <42ejrl$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slipper7486.iaccess.za
X-Posted-From: InterNews [e-mail]
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.

Recently a friend of mine was seriously injured in a rock climbing
accident as a result of not being able to communicate with his climbing
partner. I have been aware of this problem for quite some time and have
spent much time and effort trying to build some sort of short (100m)
range radio communicators, but have had no real success as i am not an
electronic engineer.

I'm sure most of you have seen the "radio headsets" scattered all over
action movies. Do these exist ? where can they be found ? what kind of
cost ? Do they work in unusual conditions ?

Any info would be appreciated

- simon


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!pirates.cs.swt.edu!news.swt.edu!nyssa.swt.edu!RR03
From: [e-mail] (Ryan Rudnicki)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: Copper Electronics phone no?
Date: 4 Sep 1995 11:01:31 GMT
Organization: Southwest Texas State University
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <42emab$[e-mail]>
References: <fmdavis-3008951611160001@47.69.129.247>,<42clbh$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: nyssa.swt.edu
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.cb:22194 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16588 rec.radio.swap:42607

In article <42clbh$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] writes:
>[e-mail] (Fred Davis VA3FD) wrote:
>
>>Can someone please post the phone number for Copper Electronics?
>
>>Thanks in advance!
>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Fred M. Davis   VA3FD           | These opinions mine
>>Nepean, ON.                     | [e-mail]
>>(Ottawa suburb)                 | [e-mail]
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>For the fiftieth time-
>
>Sales-  1-800-626-6343
>
>Service/shipping-  1-502-968-8500


Sounds like this one is a natural for the FAQ. Perhaps some other major
CB product vendors should be listed as well.

I hope the new CB FAQ editor is "listening"

Ryan Rudnicki
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:23 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: HELP ME PLEASE
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <41nk05$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 11:35:29 GMT
Lines: 16

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jerry Gardner) writes:
>Gary Coffman ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>: You didn't think broadcasting was allowed on *amateur* radio did you?
>
>Unless you're the ARRL or K1MAN...

Now, now, those aren't broadcasts, they're informational bulletins.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Mikel Frasier)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: TM-742A Questions
Date: 4 Sep 1995 16:14:14 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42f8km$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap5.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

I have been using my 742 for nearly 2 years and have not had any problems.
 I have remote mounted the control head and that works great also.  About
a year ago I added the 1.2ghz module for use on a local repeater here in
SoCal. Again, no problems.  Made the mods.  No problem.   I even moved
the modules around so now it's set up like the 942 (a label on the radio
says not to do this) but it works fine.

A great radio, and the prices seem to be coming down.  Kenwood probably
has some new models in the works.

Mikel Frasier, KN6KH



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!anat3d1.anatomy.upenn.edu!alex
From: [e-mail] (Alex Shrom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Realistic trc-216 handheld CB xcvr mods for 10 meter band?
Date: 4 Sep 1995 16:25:17 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <42f99d$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anat3d1.anatomy.upenn.edu

Anyone know of a receive mod for the above unit?  Unfortunately it
doesn't have sideband capabilities, so it wouldn't be any good for
transmitting, but I thought it might work ok for listening in on the
10 meter band.  Any thoughts?

--

Alex Shrom  -  [e-mail]  -  Major: History of Cat Art
Princeton '98 http://www.princeton.edu/~ajshrom  Minor: Yes, unfortunately



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 04 15:08:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!news.intelenet.com!newshost.neptune.net!jds
From: [e-mail] (Jeffrey D. Stai)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters?
Date: 4 Sep 1995 16:45:30 GMT
Organization: Neptune.Net (Neptune Consulting Group, Inc.)
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <42fafa$[e-mail]>
References: <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: neptune.neptune.net

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Lowman) writes:

>Definitely the all-mode 6m transceiver is the way to go.  The 6m band has
>some really surprising results when it is in good shape, as it has been for
>much of this summer.  Some really long-haul contacts have been made on 6m
>SSB and CW.

>Not sure how much simplex FM activity there is.  As far as repeaters, there
>aren't many on here in the LA area, and this must be the repeater capital of
>the US.  There are far more on 1.2 GHz than on 6m.

Yeah, that's too bad, isn't it...?

Here are some LA repeaters that I either have experience with, or have been told
that they are functional by reasonably reputable hams:

52.80RX/52.30TX PL 82.5     N6FFI
52.74RX/52.24TX PL 127.3    N6ENL
52.86RX/52.36TX             KC6WGR (So Cal 6m Club)
52.56RX/52.06TX             ditto

There are a LOT of remote bases around with 52.525 capability. There's a couple
from Mt Palomar and a couple from Sunset Ridge that pop up now and then...

73!

jeff stai, ke6knf
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!darwin.sura.net!bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us!bcfreenet!a032623t
From: [e-mail] (Kris Cordova)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: [FS TH-78A Still in the box!!!]
Date: 30 Aug 1995 18:45:10 GMT
Organization: SEFLIN Free-Net - Broward
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <422bjm$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I bought a TH-78A some time ago and listen for while but did not like
what I heard , And  now needs to sell the radio still in box. any
information call me at [phone] or fax [phone]. or write to
P.O.Box 490633 Fort Lauderdale, FLA, 33349-0633

73 PY8 USA

Kris Cordova
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.iii.net!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: Copper Electronics phone no?
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 16:33:03 GMT
Organization: iii.net
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <42clbh$[e-mail]>
References: <fmdavis-3008951611160001@47.69.129.247>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fruit.iii.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.cb:22210 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16623 rec.radio.swap:42638

[e-mail] (Fred Davis VA3FD) wrote:

>Can someone please post the phone number for Copper Electronics?

>Thanks in advance!

>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Fred M. Davis   VA3FD           | These opinions mine
>Nepean, ON.                     | [e-mail]
>(Ottawa suburb)                 | [e-mail]
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


For the fiftieth time-

Sales-  1-800-626-6343

Service/shipping-  1-502-968-8500






From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!netnews.lightside.com!user32.lightside.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Raymond J. Sarrio)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: DJ580T mod question
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 22:55:52 +0100
Organization: Raymond Sarrio Co.
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <428df5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: user32.lightside.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10338 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16648

In article <428df5$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Gerald Phillips ) wrote:

> I am atempting to do the extended receive mod. on my DJ580T.  I know
> that you are supposed to cut the red wire, but I want to make sure
> which wire you cut.  With the unit's display facing up and the bottom
> removed you can see a "red" loop wire that is about the same size as
> the blue one, and then there is a small "orange/red" wire at the top.
> I believe I cut the larger loop which is red and not the smaller loop
> that is orange/red.  If anyone can clear this up for me I would greatly
> appreciate it.  Thanks and 73.
>
> KE4MBD - Travis

Hi Travis, I sale a book by Artsci "Radio and Tech Mods and Alignments",
(discounted to $17.95) at my web ham store at
http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html. The book shows with diagrams how to expand
the DJ-580t's TX to 130-175 MHZ&410-470 MHz, also RX for Aircraft Band and
800 MHz. The book says cut hte Blue wire for expanded TX and the RED wire
For aircraft and 800 MHz The book doesn't mention an orange wire. Hope
this helps,  73's Ray

--
Ray Sarrio Co.
http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Comments about Rapid Chargers
Date: 4 Sep 1995 01:28:33 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 56
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42e2q1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (Larry Flader) writes:

>Hello. I was wondering if anyone has any comments about rapid chargers?
Are
>they good/bad for batteries etc.

Greetings Larry. Why yes I do!  I would not own a hand held tranciever
without a rapid charger.  I have VERY clear memories of dead battery
packs, and having to wait 14-15 hours for it to charge up again.  Major
frustration. Very clear memories.  I have the Icom line up, 2at, 3at,
04at, and I have discarded every 14hr charge battery pack I had.

As far as your question about being good/bad, I guess it all depends on
the charger.  I haven't heard any horror stories about chargers used for
Amateur radio equipment, but surely somebody has a bad experiance.
Anyway, If the charger is properly designed, and has some kind of fault
protection, then it shouldn't be bad for the battery.  There is just to
much information, theory, and mythology  about NiCad battery charging to
go into here, but I'll pass along my limited and hopefully not too wrong
knowledge, and no doubt if I'm wrong, I will be corrected.  The two main
methods (that I believe) of measuring battery charge are 1, cell
temperature rise above ambiant, and 2, rate-of-change of cell terminal
voltage vs: time and slope change.  The terminal voltage will actually go
down when the cell being charged the cell approaches its "full" state.
Each method has it's own advantages and dis-advantages, like anything
else.  Charging batteries (a combination of cells) presents addtional
problems too.  Charging a single cell is easy.  I reccomend you get a
couple of sources of information.  See if you can latch on to a data book
from MAXIM.  They make all kind of IC's for battery chargers, among other
things, and  I think CQ magazine, or more likely (a recent issue of) QST
has had a couple of fair to midlin articles on this subject. Like me, you
will probably learn more about battery chargers than you ever wanted to
know, and certainly more than you need to know.  Also, keep your eyes open
for posts from Gary Coffman (??).  He responds to these kind of questions
more than I do, and from what I have read, he probably forgot more about
this subject than I know.

Oh yeah, one thing you almost never see mentioned in battery stories, is
the relative capacity of NiCad batteries as compared to alkalines.  They
suck, relatively. If you see the need for operating for extended periods
with out the posibility or re-charging, make sure you have an ample
supply, of alkalines and a suitable battery case.  Alkalines have about 4
to 5 times the energy capcity (in Joules / Kg-m^3, WattHours/ pound,
AmpHours/ stone-inch^3, whatever) as compared to regular garden variety
NiCads.  But!, there is always a but, NiCads can supply more short circuit
current than a comparably sized Alkaline due to their lower internal
resistance.  I don't know about Lithium as compared to Alkaline batteries
other than they cost a bunch more.

Before I get beat up too bad, yes there are other methods of measuring
cell charge, I know, but they get a little weird IMHO.

Hope I didn't bore you Larry.  TTYL

Pat Tracy, KE1C


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:11 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!eskimo!dpsmith
From: [e-mail] (David Smith)
Subject: Re: TM-742A Questions
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 02:40:17 GMT
Lines: 52

In article <[e-mail]>,
 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Any input on the Kenwood TM-742A would be apreciated (sp).
>
>In particular I am looking for anyone who has had problems with this Rig
>but all comments are welcome.
>

Problems !!!  I have had four problems with my new (2 year old) TM-742A :

I have the 220 optional band inserted into my band.

1)  Shortly after the 220 option was inserted, I was getting a problem
    similar to a cold solder response.  Initially, when I turned on the
    radio, the 220 band would not transmit when I keyed up the repeater.
    At least the radio display didn't indicate it was tramsmitting via
    the signal bars on the LCD lighting up, nor did I get any audio
    back from the repeater I was accessing.  But, as the rig started
    to warm up, everything seemed to work properly.  I lived with this
    for awhile, then it got to be too much of a burden.  I sent it to
    the Kenwood Service Center and got this problem repaired.
2)  When it came back, I experienced another problem immediately.  Seems
    each band would hold 25 frequencies per band just fine.  When I put
    in any more per band, phantom indicators would start to appear on the
    display, even though that particular feature wasn't activated.
    Symptoms were reminiscent of a loose CPU chip.  This problem, too,
    was fixed by the service center.
3)  In unplugging the 8-pin mic and plugging in the 8-pin packet adapter
    plug, after awhile the small plastic piece on top breaks off of the
    mike jack, rendering the microphone useless.  You can either go to
    Radio Shack and buy the replacement jack adapter, or give the 1-800
    parts number and get a replacement microphone (Part # KT-91-0397-05)
    for around $ 85.00.
4)  I dropped the removable display on the ground one day (accidentally)
    after which time I found out that the display became garbled on the
    220 side and the 2 meter middle.  I do find that even though the
    display is garbled, the radio is allowed to transmit on the band.
    I just have to use my imagination on the frequency I program into
    the 220 and 2m side of the unit, as it is displayed in a foreign
    language.  I resort to an external Frequency Counter to help me
    tune in my transmitter/receiver pairs, currently.

The first two problems were replaced via a warranty repair during the
first year.  The third problem, fixed by myself.  The fourth one still
an issue.

Despite these problems, the radio is a dependable unit.  It drives a
13-element Yagi with 50 watts just fine.  I am able to bring up
repeaters 200 miles away easily.

Hope this helps,
   Dave         KB7PSN


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Boganski)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Standard C168A 2m Mini-Handheld
Date: 4 Sep 1995 05:24:30 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 7
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42e2ie$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap3.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

For Sale: Nearly New Standard C168A Mini-Handheld 2m Transceiver. Mini
size with all features; CTCSS, Paging, DTMP. All accessories; Case,
Charger,
Quick Charger, Car Adaptor. Retail Price: $525  Asking: $400. E-Mail me
directly if interested. Serious inquiries Only Please. Tom KB7ZBU at
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Inexpensive 2-meter handheld
Date: 4 Sep 1995 05:47:36 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 14
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42e3to$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Greetings!

After many years of procrastination, I finally took my tests this past
weekend and became a licensed ham (Tech-Plus)  Now, I need a radio!  I
already have an HR 2510 for 10-meters (finally, I get to use this "ham
radio" on the bands which it was "designed" for ;)  but I need an
inexpensive 2-meter handheld to get started on VHF.  HTX-202 or
comparable would be great.  Nothing fancy, just a good, solid radio that
I can get started with for cheap.  Packet capability would be a plus as
would driving distance from Charlotte (I've heard too many horror stories
about dealing over the Net)  Thanks!

-Drew in Charlotte-



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Date: 4 Sep 1995 05:55:26 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42e4ce$[e-mail]>
References: <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <42d5nk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

As far as the courts go, I would be willing to bet the house that
>if a "Native American, Afro-hispanic - transgendered lesbian " strolled
in
>the store and was refused a sale, he, she or it and the planeload of
>lawyers would end up owning the store, your house, your car, and other
>things you don't even poses yet.  Scary thought.

How right you are!  Of course, if it was an able-bodied, white male, the
case would be thrown out of court immediately.

-Drew in Charlotte-



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!jon.burt
From: [e-mail] (Jon Burt)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-736 Comments Please
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 4 Sep 95 14:37:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jon Burt)
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 14

Ed,
I just bought a IC-736 about 6 weeks ago. It was a big step up from
my old Ft-101ee! I think its a great radio, and I enjoy it, but If
I were to do it over, I think I would buy the 738 instead. 6m is nice
to have, but not too much there... The main problem w/ the 736 is the
lack of portability due to the built in power supply... of course, that
is also a feature. Good Luck!
73 de Jon
KC4UKK

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.iadfw.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Floyd Adams)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANT GE PA TO HAM INFO
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 1995 15:48:33 GMT
Organization: Internet America
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <42f73l$[e-mail]>
References: <42f1e1$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dal09-21.ppp.iadfw.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (SLO County Amateur Radio) wrote:

>Looking for any info regarding GE Mastr II PA's and using on ham band.
>The PA's that I have (460 Mhz 40 & 100W) just won't put out rated power
>when used on 440 Mhz and act rather erratic.  Is there a simple procedure
>to bring power up or need I change all the capacitors?  Thanks for any
>info here or to [e-mail].


>--
>SLO County Amateur Radio

I currently have two GE MAster EXEC II 460 radios converted to operate
in repeater service on 440.  I re-tuned the exciter, per the service
manual and did not touch the PAs.  It puts out in excess of the rated
power on both radios.  I am not aware of anyone else using the EXEC II
that has had to adjust or change anything with the PAs.  You may just
need to fine tune the exciter section.  If you need to buy a manual,
E-mail me and I will give you the info.  I think mine was under $20.
73's  Floyd  WD5ENJ



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!yakko.cs.rose-hulman.edu!crux.rose-hulman.edu!mgrdam
From: [e-mail] (David A. Moody)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: license renewal?
Date: 4 Sep 95 16:16:40 -0500
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42fl0t$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: crux.rose-hulman.edu

In article <42fl0t$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] writes:
> I have not been active in years, but am getting interested again.
>
> However, I have just realized that my license expired last December.
>
> Does anyone know how I might renew it?
>
> Thanks!

First of all, you need to get an FCC form 610, and make sure that you have
a copy of your license.  You are still well within the period of grace as
far as renewing your amateur privileges, but if I'm not mistaken, you will
be issued a new call sign from the current block.  As far as the form 610
goes, you can obtain one from the FCC very easily by calling 1-800-418-3676
from a touch tone phone and following the directions.  They are very quick
about getting the forms out.  If you know other hams in the area, they may
also be able to help.
Once you fill out the 610, include a copy of your license, send them in to
the address on the form, you will be well on your way back into amateur
radio.  It's good to see someone who has not been active for a while regain
interest in the hobby.  73
----------------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Moody                | E-mail: [e-mail]
Admin. Programmer/Analyst     | Finger: [e-mail]
Rose-Hulman Inst. of Tech.    | Amateur Call: KD8NY (CW QRP) ex-WB9MMD
Terre Haute, IN  USA  47803   | (VMS Rules!!! (but RSTS was fun.))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any facts expressed within belong to everybody.
Any opinions expressed within are my own and are not
necessarily the same as my employer, family, friends, etc.
It is up to you to know the difference.


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:18 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Best filters for TS850?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:17:51 GMT
Lines: 21
Sender: [e-mail]

I have just purchased a new Kenwood TS-850S AT.  I am interested in
hearing from anyone with experience with the narrow SSB or the more
narrow cw filters for this radio, with any comments regarding their
usefulness and performance.

I am also wondering if the company that used to make filters for Kenwood
radios is still in business.  I think they were called something like FOx
Tango Filters, or a company called IRC somewhere in Florida.

IF so, are these filters "better" than the Kenwood add on filters?  Or,
are Kenwood's or someone else's better?

Any comments would be apprecaited.

Thanks and 73's.

Herb - KG6OK


--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:19 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Best SW Control program for TS-850S?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:21:19 GMT
Lines: 13
Sender: [e-mail]

I have just purcahsed a Kenwood TS-850S.  I am interested in hearing
opinions regarding what is generrally considered to be the best software
program available to use for controlling this radio via a PC.

I would prefer a Windows based application.

Any comments would be apprecaited.

Thanks.


--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:19 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Falcon audio distrubtions amps?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:24:54 GMT
Lines: 12
Sender: [e-mail]

I am looking for some information on the Falcon Communications audio
distrubution amplifiers that are advertised in the latest HRO catalog.
(Spring / Summer HRO Catalog - page 81)

These are advertised as the F251A and the F252A.

What are these used for, and are they any good?

Any comments would be apprecaited.

--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:20 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Info and Speakers for the TS850S?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:28:38 GMT
Lines: 15
Sender: [e-mail]

I have just purcased a Kenwood TS-850S.  THe recommended matching speaker
for these radio is the SP-31.

However, I like the appearance of the SP-950 a little better.  IT looks
like the SP-950 is a litle larger in height compared to the TS-850.  SO,
other than the size, and probably the price, is there any differnce and
or advantages of the SP-950 over the SP-31 for use with a TS850S?

Thanks and 73's.

Herb - KG6OK


--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:21 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Kenwood SM-230 Question?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:32:21 GMT
Lines: 19
Sender: [e-mail]

Does the Kenwood SM-230 have the spectrum display capabilities?  I
thought it did, but I overheard someone sayong that it really was only
designed to over basic scoping capabilites, and wasn't a very good
spectrum display type device.

I thought this could be used to see band activity on either side of a
given frequency, so that if you were listening in the center of a quiet
band, you could see a signal blip on either side of you.

I know it does other functions as well, but I was particulary interested
in this.

Any other specific comments on this unit would also be apprecaited.

Thanks.


--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Pieter Ibelings)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MFJ QRP HF RIG???
Date: 4 Sep 1995 20:08:13 GMT
Organization: -.-. --.-     -.. -..-
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <42fmbd$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wave.mindspring.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11

Does anyone know if MFJ will be coming out with an All Band 160-10M
QRP Rig?

Please reply to [e-mail]

TNX & 73,
Tony...



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (William Rice)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: NEED TRANSWORLD RADIO REPAIR
Date: 4 Sep 1995 20:18:07 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <42fmtv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-atl12-07.ix.netcom.com

I'm looking for someone with expertise,preferably someone from the
factory, that will work on Transworld Communications products at an
hourly rate less than the factory.
            thanks
David Panek, ke4mlv
Call 404-331-7211 or email


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news1.digital.com!nntp-hub2.barrnet.net!pacbell.com!amdahl.com!amd!netcomsv!uucp3.netcom.com!loretta!red-eft!ibbs!js
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jeff Stillinger)
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Stillinger)
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 1995 21:07:28 GMT
Subject: Computer For Sale
Lines: 8


Hello,

I have a AST 486sx laptop computer for sale.  The typical acces.  Used for
Air Force Tech school and minor packet op's.  $1000.00 OBO P/U only Edwards
AFB area.



--
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Stillinger - KB6IBB                              [e-mail]
PSC Box 3429                                          [e-mail]
Edwards AFB, CA  93524                                [phone]N1
         KB6IBB Repeater sometimes heard in Los Angeles 449.6250
  No air power without ground power!  They don't get off, until we come.


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:24 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!inter.nl.net!waasdorp
From: Coen Waasdorp <[e-mail]>
Subject: small size beam, available?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ldn99-11.leiden.nl.net
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News at news)
Organization: NL Net
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.06 <V3qIi1cDYF6SVYARD7$C+H0$PN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 1995 21:27:16 GMT
Lines: 8

The space available is limited for putting up an antenna at my location.
Does a small size beam exist? I am thinking of a size of 2 to 3 sq
meters in total?
Any suggestions are appreciated.

--
Coen Waasdorp
PA0COE


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!winternet.com!winternet.com!news
From: [e-mail] (Edward Addy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Community Active Ham Volunteers Needed!!
Date: 4 Sep 1995 22:27:29 GMT
Organization: N. American Cntr. for Emerg. Comms.
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <42fugh$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-66-146.dialup.winternet.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.5

        ITS YOUR FAMILY AND YOUR COMMUNITY,
WON'T YOU HELP US TO BETTER SERVE THEM IN A CRISIS.

After a large disaster strikes your community and your family, I am
sure you will agree that its a little late to start building a massive rapid
response, emergency communications system supported by thousands
of people within companies, organizations and serving as volunteers to
provide essential support services.

We are The North American Center For Emergency Communications
Inc. (NACEC), a Federally registered Non-profit organization serving
North America since 1992.  We have been developing a system that
merges many different technologies to create a unique, high capacity,
rapidly deployable solution to the problem of communications outages
and shortages that occur following a large disaster.  Our volunteer
network in using the Internet as its communications backbone, is
itself using one of the many technologies employed in NACEC's overall
solution.

To help ensure the greatest possible effectiveness in as many communities
as possible throughout North America, we are developing a very large
volunteer network of community volunteers (Community Ambassadors)
who work with our staff and their local communities.  If you are community
active and are interested in helping, we need your help, NOW.  Please,
don't wait until disaster strikes, help us to be prepared and be ready to assist
your community.

                BECOME PART OF THE SOLUTION!

The more communities that are represented by our volunteer network,
the more effective we can be in disaster preparedness,  emergency
operations and in the area of emergency and military family message
handling and delivery.

As a NACEC volunteer (Community Ambassador) you will assist with
the movement of information that is vital to the continued success and
growth of this organization and the survivability of your family and your
community following a large disaster.

This project is growing rapidly, as we locate and add new dedicated
volunteers from as many communities as possible from across North
America.  I hope you will join us in making this organization a success.

To find out more about how you can get involved in this project and use
your Internet skills to help your community, please review the information
that is in our WWW Homepage area which can be found at:

        http://www.winternet.com/~nacec/index.html

An electronic volunteer application form can also be found there as well. Should you have any questions, please address them to me at: [e-mail]


Respectfully,

Mr. Edward Addy
Executive Director


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!u.cc.utah.edu!ew9186
From: [e-mail] (Eugene Watanabe)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Standard Dual Band Mobile C5718
Date: 5 Sep 1995 00:25:08 GMT
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <42g5d4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: u.cc.utah.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

For Sale: Standard Dual Band Mobile Radio C5718a--less than a year old
(actually still under warranty).  Only used as base--in almost new
condition.  Comes with 4 meter extension for remote/microphone, and 200
memory expansion chip.  With all boxes, manuals, and originial receipt.
asking $599.

Eugene (AA7BH)

Please e-mail to [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet
From: "Charles J. Hawley Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Best filters for TS850?
Date: 5 Sep 1995 00:30:34 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42g5na$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: canberra-13.slip.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

I have the Kenwood 500's and the 270 and like them. I have heard that
the 1.8 KHz is a little too narrow.  The IRC filters are superior, but
they are bigger in size and require a little work to get them installed.
Many people have done it, but I just wanted something neater.

Chuck - KE9UW



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!homer.alpha.net!usenet
From: "Darryl Goebel, CCP" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: license renewal?
Date: 5 Sep 1995 01:57:59 GMT
Organization: Keane, Inc.
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <42gar7$[e-mail]>
References: <42fl0t$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 169.207.5.105
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]

After you file the form 610, call up this URL every day or two:

http://www.ualr.edu/doc/hamualr/callsign.html

It is a searchable list of all HAM licenses and licensees.
As soon as you see your name posted again with an updated date,
you're legal to get back on the air!

K7TTJ



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!usenet
From: atanner <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Any info on pirat
Date: 5 Sep 1995 02:58:15 GMT
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42gec7$[e-mail]>
References: <42d7a2$[e-mail]> <42ev7r$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h-shiva.norfolk.infi.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

As for frequencies, I'd go after two of the most listened to yet not
even widely known VHF frequencies. Try 121.5 MHz and 243.00 MHz.

There are a huge number of listeners there and it is the very best place
to immediately have an audience.

You might notice that 243.00 is an exact multiple of 121.5 and this is
no accident it is called an HARMONIC. The SECOND HARMONIC to be exact so
you can transmit on 121.5 with a homebrew kit and stand a very good
chance of being heard on both frequencies.

Most listeners will be using AM receivers but you can use an FM
transmitter and still generate a LOT of attention to your new station.







From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!usenet
From: atanner <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WANTED: Any info on pirat
Date: 5 Sep 1995 03:03:19 GMT
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <42geln$[e-mail]>
References: <42d7a2$[e-mail]> <42ev7r$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h-shiva.norfolk.infi.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]

An afterthough to the wannabe pirate.

I do hope you realize my post was all in fun. Don't even THINK of
transmitting on either of those two frequencies!!!! Oh, my God, yes
you WILL have an audience but NOT the kind you would care for.

And pirate radio of any sort is ILLEGAL!!!

The FCC has very sharp teeth indeed. I suggest you forget the whole idea.






From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!hbcsc274
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:Alinco DR-592T dual band mobile
Date: 5 Sep 1995 03:10:08 GMT
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <42gf2g$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.csun.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


Alinco DR-592T dual band mobile radio.
VHF:
144.000 - 147.995 tx
135.000 - 173.995 rx
UHF
440.000 - 449.995 tx
410.000 - 469.995 rx

VHF
5-10-45 Watts
UHF
4-8-35 Watts

DTMF Mic
CTCSS Encode
28 memories
Cross Band Repeater
DTMF Squelch
And all the other standard features.
Prefer to sell in LA area (Canoga Park).
$425 obo (paid $540 just over a year ago).
Buyer pays shipping costs if any.

Email [e-mail] or call 818-882-0101
Jerry Wang (KE6UUX)



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help!...Hallicrafter SX-101A
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 95 05:15:06 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42gdrk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Rfrans) wrote:

>I just acquired a Hallicrafter sx101a...80,40,and 20 meters work
>GREAT! But...I can get nothing on either 10 or 15 meters...  Is this
>a calibration problem...alignment problem...does anyone have any
>advice for me as to where to start???  Thanks in advance!

Are yous *sure* the problem's in the receiver?  Here in NE PA, 15M and
10M are almost completely dead and very quiet.

Just thought I would mention that, in case you're relying on on-air
signals for your tests.

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 95 05:26:39 GMT
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Jim Martin) wrote:

>If there is NO law stating that a person must be licensed in order to
>purchase a transmitter...then there are no legal grounds for refusing
>to sell.

Sure there are.  The property belongs to him and the fact it's present
in his storefront doesn't give anyone the right to take it without his
permission, whether they pay him for it or not.  As the owner of the
property, he has every right to determine the exact conditions under
which he's willing to part with it, whether it's price, terms, use or
anything else.  What moral grounds whould you propose in forcing him
to do otherwise?

>(I'm not an attorney....just using common sense...and I sell amateur
>equipment to unlicensed individuals all the time.)

That's too bad.  Most of the dealers I've known had higher standards.

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Dan Brown)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 05:45:16 GMT
Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <42god2$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: a105017.sfo5.as.crl.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (WB3U) wrote:

>>equipment to unlicensed individuals all the time.)

>That's too bad.  Most of the dealers I've known had higher standards.

        Why is it an indication of "low standards" to sell to an unlicensed
individual?  There are at least a few good reasons for an unlicensed
individual to buy a rig.

1.      People say the best way to learn CW is to listen off the air.
Well, that means you need a radio.  Granted, receivers are available,
but lots of people prefer the all-in-one convenience of a transceiver,
which is why they're the most common type of rig.  Why not let this
person buy a rig to help learn code?

2.      Similar reasoning for 2m, to familiarize him/herself with
local repeater customs.  When the license arrives, the new ham is less
likely to be a lid on the repeater, having learned how people use it.

3.      As has already been mentioned, as a gift to a ham.

4.      Under the current FCC regs, a person has operating authority
as soon as the callsign is assigned, and need not wait for the license
to arrive in the mail.  Without the paper license, however, he has no
way to prove to you that he is, in fact, licensed (anyone can make up
a callsign, if that's all they have to do).  Why won't you let him buy
a rig and get on the air?

--
Dan Brown, KE6MKS
[e-mail], NOT [e-mail]
Don't tread on me.



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:35 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!herbr
From: [e-mail] (Herb Rosenberg)
Subject: Re: Best filters for TS850?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <[e-mail]> <42g5na$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 06:00:58 GMT
Lines: 16
Sender: [e-mail]

Do you know a source for the IRC filters?

Thanks.

Herb

Charles J. Hawley Jr. ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I have the Kenwood 500's and the 270 and like them. I have heard that
: the 1.8 KHz is a little too narrow.  The IRC filters are superior, but
: they are bigger in size and require a little work to get them installed.
: Many people have done it, but I just wanted something neater.

: Chuck - KE9UW

--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: 5 Sep 1995 06:20:18 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42gq72$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42god2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

This whole notion about not selling equipment to unlicensed operators is
ridiculous!  The only thing you are going to accomplish is the loss of
the profit you would have made on the radio!

Consider:

Anyone who wants an amateur radio can get one; they are widely available:
inexpensive 2-meter and 440 handhelds can be found at any Radio Shack
store.  For 10-meters, it's even easier: show me a truck stop that
doesn't sell Rangers, Emperors, etc.

Wake up people!!  Not selling radios to the unlicensed?  Ethical, yes but
practical? Not hardly.


-Drew in Charlotte-



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (J.Fitter BV/N0IAT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Info, TRIO - TKMS-4205 UHF radio
Date: 5 Sep 1995 07:04:08 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Asia, Semiconductor Finance
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <42gsp8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.167.36.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

Hi All, I've come across a UHF radio, a TRIO (Kenwood)
TKMS-4205.  This is a 5-watt output, single crystal,
UHF rig designed for the Japanese Taxi Service.
Appears to include built-in CTCSS encode and decode
with the microphone-to-ground listening scheme.  It is
currently operating on 465.150 with a separate TX and
RX crystal.

The receiver has an  excellent helically filtered
front-end, posts sensitivity of about 0.12uV
on-the-bench, output tx is 5 watts, and appears as
durable as a Motorola (all metal case, super HD
bracket, BIG front speaker, 4 watts of audio, etc.
etc). and I'd like to convert this to 430 FM for a
remote receiver, or packet, or ???.

Question:  Any idea of the crystal scheme?  A call and
several faxes to Kenwood Japan have revealed _NO_
information. JAN had no idea either.   Also, probably
I'll need to retune the receiver but dont have a
service manual.

Anyone know if these were available in the USA or
Europe or have more info? Inside datecode reveals
about 1984 vintage gear.


Thanks,
73 from Joe BV2/N0IAT  Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.
Ex. 7J1AOF(Japan) KA0ZDH(novice) YU3/N0IAT(Slovenia)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986 //comments are mine
only



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!yama.mcc.ac.uk!warwick!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!llondel.demon.co.uk
From: David Hough <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.radio.uk,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Reciprocal license procedure/am. radio mod
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 95 07:18:08  GMT
Organization: Home
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: llondel.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: cppnews $Revision: 1.43 $
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16694 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29281 alt.radio.uk:3566

In article <[e-mail]>
   [e-mail] (Andy Brandt) writes:
>
> In a related vein, I have been told that radios manufactured for sale in
> the US are not equipped to transmit a tone which opens up repeaters
> throughout Europe.  I own an Alinco DJ-580T handheld dual-band, and I know
> there is an Alinco DJ-580E which is nearly identical except that it is
> manufactured for use in Europe.  Is there a modification I can perform, or
> is there an accessory I can buy to make my handheld repeater-capable when
> I visit the UK?
>
You need to arrage a -600kHz shift on TX for 2M and a +1.6MHz shift TX
on transmit. Next, you need a 1750Hz toneburst or practice your
whistling! (For disbelievers it *is* possible to open most repeaters by
whistling - one VK thought I was winding him up.....)

And don't forget we use 25kHz channel spacing and the band limits are
144-146 and 430-440MHz!

Dave
--
[e-mail]                 My other .sig is a work of art


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ee.und.ac.za!iafrica.com!ticsa.com!cstatd.cstat.co.za!ucthpx!itu1.sun.ac.za!s9231498
From: [e-mail] (Mnr PJ Le Riche)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Microwave Associates: How to contact?
Date: 5 Sep 1995 09:15:36 GMT
Organization: University of Stellenbosch
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <42h4fo$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.232.212.23
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


Hi!

I am building a high-speed digital communications system and need two
MA87127 "Gunnplexer" Gunn transceivers. These are manufactured by Microwave
Associates, but I am unable to contact them.

I have tried the number on the data sheets [phone] in Massachusetts,
but nobody answers. I have also tried faxing them, but nothing gets
through...

If anybody has a current telephone number, fax number or EMAIL address I
would be very grateful.

Pierre



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Advice: Best PC for HF digital?
Date: 5 Sep 1995 09:37:08 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 5
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42hjq4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I want to buy a PC to use with HF/VHF digital modes (amtor/pactor/Clover
using the HAL P38 board...slow scan...whatever). What is the best
kind/brand to get? 486's seem pretty reasonable now. Any particular ones
more "quiet" than others? I have always used Macintosh and don't know much
abt the PC realm. All input is welcome. 73's Mike KS4DA


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!spider!usenet
From: John Morris <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.radio.uk,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Reciprocal license procedure/am. radio mod
Date: 5 Sep 1995 11:06:36 GMT
Organization: Spider Systems Limited, Edinburgh, UK.
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <42havs$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-245.spider.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 32bit)
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16633 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29268 alt.radio.uk:3536

David Hough <[e-mail]> wrote:
>In article <[e-mail]>
>   [e-mail] (Andy Brandt) writes:
>>
>> In a related vein, I have been told that radios manufactured for sale in
>> the US are not equipped to transmit a tone which opens up repeaters
>> throughout Europe.  I own an Alinco DJ-580T handheld dual-band, and I know
>> there is an Alinco DJ-580E which is nearly identical except that it is
>> manufactured for use in Europe.  Is there a modification I can perform, or
>> is there an accessory I can buy to make my handheld repeater-capable when
>> I visit the UK?
>>
>You need to arrage a -600kHz shift on TX for 2M and a +1.6MHz shift TX
>on transmit. Next, you need a 1750Hz toneburst or practice your
            ^
            ^
            for 70 cms.

>whistling! (For disbelievers it *is* possible to open most repeaters by
>whistling - one VK thought I was winding him up.....)

Also, most repeaters are "tone access, carrier re-access", so once the QSO
has started there's no need to send a tone on each transmission.

73, John, GM4ANB




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!news-mail-gateway
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: subscribe to
Date: 5 Sep 95 11:50:20 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: [e-mail]

subscribe to newsgroup rec.radio.amateur.equipment



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!dsinc!wells!w2up!barry
From: [e-mail] (Barry Kutner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: K1EA Digital Voice Processor (DVP)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 95 11:51:23 GMT
Organization: W2UP, Newtown, PA
Lines: 14

For sale - K1EA DVP. For those of you not familiar with this product, it
is an 8 bit card that allows you to record audio and send it by hit a
function key (F1-F7), controlled by a TSR. It also allows you to record
audio from your rig for later playback. When used with K1EA's CT program,
also will phoneticize callsigns when transmitting.
Mint condition. $180.

--
=======================================================================
Barry N. Kutner, W2UP       Internet: [e-mail]
Newtown, PA                 Packet Radio: W2UP @ WB3JOE.#EPA.PA.USA.NA
                            Packet Cluster: W2UP >WB2R (FRC)
.......................................................................



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!nntp
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: Dick Harper <[e-mail]>
Date: 5 Sep 95 12:32:27 CDT
References: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: dharper.his.kumc.edu
Lines: 16

[e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>
> Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?
>
Yes there were CB repeaters.  I used to sell them.  They were
licensed as Class A and operated in the UHF band.

I'm not up on the current regulations for this but understand that
some REACT groups are using something similar on GMRS.

You will probably have some lengthy license applications to complete
if this is still allowed.

Hope this helps,

73's de N0USP, Dick


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!aggedor.rmit.EDU.AU!lucy.swin.edu.au!edna!917461
From: [e-mail] (Graham Michael Wolstenholme)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT290-II blowing lamps
Date: 5 Sep 1995 13:18:04 GMT
Organization: Swinburne University of Technology
Lines: 25
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42himc$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edna.cc.swin.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Rafael Solis) writes:
: > A friend of mine with no net access asked me to post a question about
: > his Yaesu FT290 Mark II all mode 2m xceiver.  He has changed the lamps
: > in the power meter twice and he wonders if there is a way to reduce
: > the voltage going to that tiny lamp.  Has anyone experience burnt
: > lamps on this radio.  Yaesu charges $30 for changing the lamp!
: > Thanks and 73
: > Rafael  (KE6JSR)
: Hi,
: Your friends problem is the 3rd instance I have heard of this. My own 2 yr old
: 290mkII has not exhibited the problem. Interesting. He may try a series
: resistor in the lamp lead.

: Joe - AA3GN

Ft 290 mkI does this too. If I could only get mine fixed for $30!...
Some years ago the problem did the rounds on packet. The resistor in
series was suggested, but the most elegant solution I saw was to use a
clear LED.
Another problem I had at the time was the contacts on the transmit relay
getting crappy - no transmit. Pull the top off the relay to clean the
contacts or fit a new relay.
Graham VK3TGW



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!news-mail-gateway
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GIEHL
Date: 5 Sep 95 14:32:12 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <3AF59DDB@MHS>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: [e-mail]

Does anyone have the Email/fax/telephone number for Giehl in Cincinati Ohio.

Thanks
Roland WF4P

[e-mail]
or [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:48 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!news.supernet.net!news.cais.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!lfsserv1.lfs.loral.com!news-owego.endicott.ibm.com!news.manassas.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!bocanews.bocaraton.ibm.com!sernews.raleigh.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!news
From: [e-mail] (Rick Trommer)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Sender: [e-mail] (News id)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 14:53:02 GMT
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rick Trommer)
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: IBM Austin
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09
Lines: 27

In <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (WB3U) writes:
>   [e-mail] (Jim Martin) wrote:
>
>>If there is NO law stating that a person must be licensed in order to
>>purchase a transmitter...then there are no legal grounds for refusing
>>to sell.
>
>Sure there are.  The property belongs to him and the fact it's present
>in his storefront doesn't give anyone the right to take it without his
>permission, whether they pay him for it or not.  As the owner of the
>property, he has every right to determine the exact conditions under
>which he's willing to part with it, whether it's price, terms, use or
>anything else.  What moral grounds whould you propose in forcing him
>to do otherwise?
>
>>(I'm not an attorney....just using common sense...and I sell amateur
>>equipment to unlicensed individuals all the time.)
>
>That's too bad.  Most of the dealers I've known had higher standards.
>
>73,
>
>Jack  WB3U

Does this also mean that a run-of-the-mill IC-735 should only be owned
by EXTRA class operators.... as everyone else could talk out of band!



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.tele.fi!news.csc.fi!nokia.fi!news.nmp.nokia.com!canews.ca.nmp.nokia.com!turnerc
From: [e-mail] (Clive Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2metre multimode for sale
Date: 5 Sep 1995 16:36:32 GMT
Organization: Nokia Mobile Phones
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <42huag$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cadoc3.ca.nmp.nokia.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.delphi.com!news2.delphi.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] ([e-mail])
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 1941 Collins Xmtr FS
Date: 5 Sep 1995 18:32:52 -0400
Organization: Delphi Internet Services Corporation
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <42ij6k$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news2.delphi.com
Summary: 1941 TCS-12 Xmtr FS
Keywords: Antique, Xmtr

        1941 Collins Naval TCS-12 transmitter, with 12VDC power supply
        (dynamotor), has all cables, antenna tuner, and original
        Manual. Excellent condition asking $100.

        Please call [phone] or e-mail ([e-mail])



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:50 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!vanbc.wimsey.com!jhs.ve7job!linux.ve7job!ve7job
From: [e-mail] (Jim O'Brien)
Subject: Test Post Only
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Organization: linux.ve7job.ampr.org
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 18:55:09 GMT
Lines: 5

Just a test post from linux.ve7job Sept 5/95 11:54 AM.






From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.sojourn.com!sojourn1.sojourn.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (John Goggan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Trade: My handheld transceiver for your handheld scanner!
Date: 5 Sep 1995 22:24:47 GMT
Organization: Sojourn Systems.  Lansing, MI (USA)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <42iinf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sojourn1.sojourn.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 941216BETA PL0]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.swap:42668 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16653

I have an ICOM IC-3AT handheld 220 MHz transceiver that I am interested
in trading for a handheld scanner.  The IC-3AT includes the rubber duck,
wall charger, and BP-3.  The scanner should preferably be either
cell-modded or call-mod-capable.  But I'll consider others possibly.

In any case, if interested, just let me know...

Thanks!

 - John...
   [e-mail] or [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (KB0OME)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: scanner/baypac/laptop/mfj for sale
Date: 6 Sep 1995 03:11:26 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 13
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42jhiu$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KB0OME)

I am advertising for a friend

Bearcat 800 cellular modified    200

REgency scanner z-30              30

Zenith Laptop                           75

Baypac modem                       30

MFJ RTTY CW Interface           30

If your interested let me know... or give me other offers


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (KE4WPP)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-51R Mod
Date: 6 Sep 1995 03:16:30 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 6
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42jhse$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KE4WPP)

Does anyone know if the 51R can be modified?  If so, what frequencies does
it receive?  Where would be a good place to find this mod?

    Thanks,

              DE KE4WPP


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!news.sol.net!solaria.sol.net!garyk9gs
From: [e-mail] (Gary Schwartz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Found Radio in Road
Date: 6 Sep 1995 04:30:37 GMT
Organization: Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <42j85d$[e-mail]>
References: <425jo9$[e-mail]> <4269jn$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: solaria.sol.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]

J.Fitter BV/N0IAT ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Steve, Afraid I've no idea about that radio but interesting story. Your wife is to be
: complimented, as most ham wives would narry stop the car, get out, and retreive a radio.

My wife would have left the radio in the road, backed up a few hundred
feet, gunned it and hit it again.  Then she would have stopped, turned
around and hit it again!

: What's the secret?
: Cheers - n - Beers,
: Joe

73,
Gary K9GS

--
         ________________________________________________________________
        |                                                                |
        | Gary Schwartz  K9GS           E-Mail: [e-mail] |
        | Society of Midwest Contesters   Packet:[e-mail] |
        | Greater Milwaukee DX Association Secretary/Treasurer           |
        |________________________________________________________________|





From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:55 1995
Newsgroups: rec.audio.marketplace,rec.audio.pro,rec.music.makers.marketplace,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.video.production
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!eskimo!rickc
From: [e-mail] (Rick Chinn)
Subject: Re: Old German Vacuum Tube WTB
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: rec.audio.marketplace,rec.audio.pro,rec.music.makers.marketplace,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.video.production
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <42b901$l2m$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 06:31:04 GMT
Lines: 13
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.audio.marketplace:20185 rec.audio.pro:48272 rec.music.makers.marketplace:30792 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16655 rec.video.production:25659

jeff Kloth ([e-mail]) wrote:
: VF-14 tube used in Germany 1940s and 50s.  Hard to find.  Used or
: in box.  I need it!!!!
: Call collect: Jeff 312-644-4300 Days  FAX [phone]

: --

Try calling Jerry Graham, at G-Prime in NYC.  If they don't have any,
he'll most likely know where there are.

--rick chinn

: JPK


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!ajl-elec.ajl-elec.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Andy Luckman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.radio.uk,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Reciprocal license procedure/am. radio mod
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 08:56:39 +0100
Organization: AJL Electronics (G6FGO)
Lines: 22
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42jkl5$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ajl-elec.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: ajl-elec.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Archimedes TTFN Version 0.36
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16656 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29271 alt.radio.uk:3546

In message <42jkl5$[e-mail]> Walt Davidson wrote:

> David Hough <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >For disbelievers it *is* possible to open most repeaters by whistling
>
> Or squeaking .....
>
> 73 de G3NYY
>
> --
> Walt Davidson               E-mail: [e-mail]
>                                     [e-mail]
>

No No! Squeaking is what shuts the repeater down again!

--
Andy Luckman G6FGO

Internet: "It's life Jim, but not as we know it!"


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newshost.marcam.com!usc!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!storm.atms.purdue.edu!bap
From: BRETSKI <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Plans needed for a Jpole made of copper tubing
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 09:05:14 -0500
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: storm.atms.purdue.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I know of a Jpole that can be made from copper tubing. I made one out of
ladder line but I want something more "permanent". Are there text plans
out there for such a beast? Thanks


BRET A. PENNINGTON /  COMPUTER TECHNICIAN   /EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CIVL 4252 317-494-0678 / PURDUE UNIVERSITY  / WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA 47907
[e-mail]                   /     speaking only for myself.
/\/\/\/\/\/ __... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ N9ZFF /\/\/\/\/\/ ...__ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:48:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Muenzler, Kevin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advert
Date: 6 Sep 1995 10:18:27 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Lines: 34
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.cs.utexas.edu

 [e-mail] (Jim Martin) writes:
<snip>
>...Just because YOU, personally, do not like the idea
>doesn't mean that it is illegal.
<snip>

>Jack, will you please tell me what laws there are prohibiting the sale of
>amateur equipment to non-licensed individuals?
>Just because someone "owns"
>merchandise doesn't give the absolute right to refuse to sell it to
anyone...
>That would open the door to a discrimination lawsuit, don't ya think?

Yes it does.  If I own a piece of equipment I can sell or not sell it to
whomever
I wish.  Just as a business establishment can refuse service to any
individual or group of individuals as long as there is no "malicious intent
to discriminate."  He may also have to prove this in a court of law.

The only law prohibiting the sale of amateur gear to non-licensed
persons in the US is the sale of linear (or otherwise) amplifiers
that are capable of operating in the range of 22-30MHz.  It is also
against the law for a non-licensed person to possess such a device.
I personally don't think it is a good idea to sell your rig to a
non-licensed
person that you don't know.  However I have sold equipment to unlicensed
people that I know who are now hams.

That's it.

non-licensed or unlicensed => no ham license for you legalistic types.

Kevin, WB5RUE
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!feenix.metronet.com!news
From: [e-mail] (Bill Abernathy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Comspec ts32 encoder/decoder
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 10:22:01 GMT
Organization: Texas Metronet
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <42jsk4$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: net202.metronet.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99a.107

Can someone share with me (fax or otherwise) the doc that comes with a
comspec ts32 ENCODE/DECODER ?  I dug one up out of my parts box I want
to use, but cannot find the doc as to the connections/configuration
for the decode part.  At the very least, could someone provide a phone
number of Communications Specialists so I might get it from them. TNX
and 73 de Bill, kd5lu.
-------------------------------------------------------------
[e-mail]    -    Bill Abernathy
-------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:00 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!CERN.ch!sp056!bohl
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Bohl)
Subject: Search spare part for wideband amplifier ZHL-1042J
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sp056.cern.ch
Message-ID: <bohl.810382995@rscernix>
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #7 (NOV)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:23:15 GMT
Lines: 18


   Dear colleagues,

   does anybody know what type of transistor is used in the final
   stage of the Mini Circuits wideband amplifier ZHL-1042-J ?

   Mini Circuits does not make spare parts available for this
   amplifier. A new amplifier costs about USD 500.

   Until now I just got one useful info. It was Mike, KD4QDM, who
   told me that the transistor is probably a GaAs FET from Avantek.

   Does anybody know more ?

   73 de Thomas, F5SWE
   [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.mailorder.com!news.avatar.com!news.avatar.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Kory Hamzeh)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Subject: AEA PK-232MBX & Yaesu FT-736R
Date: 6 Sep 1995 10:27:52 -0700
Organization: Avatar Consultants, Inc.
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42klmo$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avatar.avatar.com
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16688 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10352

I have a AEA PK232 TNC and a Yaesu FT-736R rig. The 736 has data in/out jack
for TNCs. This method bypasses the FM modulaters pre-emphasis and de-emphasis
circuits. Its suppose to be better, unless the TNC already compensates
for this, in which case it would be worse. The Yaesu manual states that
most TNC-2 clones already do the compensation and I believe the PK232 is
a TNC-2 clone. I've been trying for two days now to call AEA and ask them
this question, but the tech support lines are *constantly* busy.

The main reason that I want to hook up my TNC this way is that I don't
have to plug/unplug the TNC and Mic and Speaker jacks. I know I can buy
a switch box from MFJ, but then thats two more gadgets that I really don't
need.

Thanks,
Kory
KE6VWO




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!bt!mokuyoubi.srd.bt.co.uk!user
From: [e-mail] (John Regnault)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.radio.uk,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Reciprocal license procedure/am. radio mod
Date: 6 Sep 1995 10:42:04 GMT
Organization: BT Laboratories
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42jkl5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mokuyoubi.srd.bt.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0b27.2
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16668 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29274 alt.radio.uk:3556

In article <42jkl5$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Walt Davidson) wrote:

> David Hough <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >For disbelievers it *is* possible to open most repeaters by whistling
>
> Or squeaking .....
>

..... and I thought that squeaking was intended to close repeaters down

John G4SWX


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!btnet!bt!mokuyoubi.srd.bt.co.uk!user
From: [e-mail] (John Regnault)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.radio.uk,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Reciprocal license procedure/am. radio mod
Date: 6 Sep 1995 10:47:44 GMT
Organization: BT Laboratories
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42jkl5$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mokuyoubi.srd.bt.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0b27.2
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16659 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29273 alt.radio.uk:3549

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] wrote:

> > >For disbelievers it *is* possible to open most repeaters by whistling
> >
> > Or squeaking .....
> >
>
> No No! Squeaking is what shuts the repeater down again!
>

Woops loks like we have a "repeater" situation.... better move to 12.5KHz
quickly !!!!!

John G4SWX

      "I wonder if I ought to stand for RSGB council this year ?? "


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!moose.rkg.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Bryce Wolfson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Found Radio in Road
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 11:46:47 -0700
Organization: RKG Communications [phone]
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <425jo9$[e-mail]> <4269jn$[e-mail]> <42j85d$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: moose.rkg.com

In article <42j85d$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Gary
Schwartz) wrote:

> J.Fitter BV/N0IAT ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
> : Steve, Afraid I've no idea about that radio but interesting story.
Your wife is to be
> : complimented, as most ham wives would narry stop the car, get out, and
retreive a radio.
>
> My wife would have left the radio in the road, backed up a few hundred
> feet, gunned it and hit it again.  Then she would have stopped, turned
> around and hit it again!

Is this presumption based on personal experience?

Sounds like a wife in a little need of re-tuning. ;-)

'course, my s/o prolly woulda done the same... She hasn't been happy about
my mumblings regarding getting my hands on an new FT-8500. She thinks I
ought to sell (ha!) my TM-733A first. She just *doesn't* understand. Must
be that "but I want to buy a house!" thing... ;-)

Cheers!
-Bryce KD6QDS


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:05 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!UB.com!pippen.ub.com!news
From: "David W. Bourque" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Looking 4 Mutek info
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (The Daily News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dbourque.andr.ub.com.99.203.128.in-addr.arpa
Organization: Ungermann-Bass, Inc
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 13:04:22 GMT
Lines: 16

I am looking for the
mailing address/phone number/email address/any info at all
for a company called Mutek.
I understand they are based in the UK and they made/make front
end modification for some VHF radios.  In particular I'm interested
in any improvements to the Icom 271A.  Any information would
be greatly appreciated.

PLEASE RESPOND VIA EMAIL as my news reader is been having LOTS
of problems lately and I may miss it.

Thanks.
David Bourque
WB1FLD
email to [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:06 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: HF tranciever vs reciever's for audio quality
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <42a8if$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 15:29:41 GMT
Lines: 12

NO ..The main reason is due to the narrow bandwidth of the AM filters in
the transceivers. If you want high quality audio you may have to install
an optional 6kc wide AM filter in your IF stage. Transcievers were not
designed for hi-fi rather they were designed for sharp selectivity in
both the IF and AF stages. Usually the audio rolls off at about 3kc
making them sound rather dull for music anyway. Usually, even cheap
shortwave radios can sound better than the megabucks ham rig.
--
  Steve
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:07 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: Info and Speakers for the TS850S?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 15:32:24 GMT
Lines: 25

Bad idea. The 850 speaker will enhance the resale value of your radio.
Stick with the proper one. The sound difference wont matter. If you want
good sound then you need to get a large HI-FI speaker.

Herb Rosenberg ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I have just purcased a Kenwood TS-850S.  THe recommended matching speaker
: for these radio is the SP-31.

: However, I like the appearance of the SP-950 a little better.  IT looks
: like the SP-950 is a litle larger in height compared to the TS-850.  SO,
: other than the size, and probably the price, is there any differnce and
: or advantages of the SP-950 over the SP-31 for use with a TS850S?

: Thanks and 73's.

: Herb - KG6OK


: --
: [e-mail]
--
  Steve
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:08 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: Need Advice: Best PC for HF digital?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <42hjq4$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 15:36:00 GMT
Lines: 16

Get one with a metal cabinet. I've used old IBM ps-2's and they are
pretty quite. Keyboards can radiate a lot of hash. Be sure it has a well
shielded cable etc. Processor speed doesn't make much difference because
your I/O speed is only 9600 baud anyway. An 8088 will even work fine.

Mparkes ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I want to buy a PC to use with HF/VHF digital modes (amtor/pactor/Clover
: using the HAL P38 board...slow scan...whatever). What is the best
: kind/brand to get? 486's seem pretty reasonable now. Any particular ones
: more "quiet" than others? I have always used Macintosh and don't know much
: abt the PC realm. All input is welcome. 73's Mike KS4DA
--
  Steve
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2meter Handheld for newbie
Date: 6 Sep 1995 15:37:37 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 20
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42kf81$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <42k7pq$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

[e-mail] (RENFAH) wrote:
>
>If you are looking for a good 2 meter HT, I would consider Radio
Shack's
>HTX-202.  It is a basic radio which won't allow you to receive out of
the
>two meter ham band, but because of this, Intermod is reduced greatly.
I
>have two of them and they perform better on 2 meters than my Icom
V21AT's
>They have all the features you need to use any local repeaters and are
>fairly rugged. They are on sale now at Radio Shack for $199.00


WHERE?  Is this a local sale?  Here in Charlotte, they still want $259.95.



-Drew in Charlotte-



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!ftp.unisql.com!unisql.unisql.com!news
From: Jim Strohm <jstrohm@blazer>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Change WBFM to NBFM????
Date: 6 Sep 1995 15:49:58 GMT
Organization: UniSQL, Inc.
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <42kfv6$[e-mail]>
References: 29vje$[e-mail]> <42e0s3$[e-mail]> <42e92l$[e-mail]> <42ht1a$[e-mail]> <42it32$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blazer.unisql.com
X-Newsreader: NCSA Mosaic
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9352 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16682 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86082

In my defense, I suggested a 0.02 fix on a $20. rig.

If you want a 25-year-old military surplus rig to work like a $900 1995
rig, you can do it.  But it's going to cost more than $900 if you figure
your time as worth more than minimum wage.

A speech processor (properly adjusted) is useful on any rig.  There's no
telling what condition the existing audio shaping circuitry is in on a
surplus rig that's old enough to vote.  Getting the deviation down to where
the rig can be heard and understood on the air is the first step.  Better
receiver filtering is esssential as well -- but you can buy a superior
one-chip FM receiver from Moto for $3.   Do you want to go through a
varnish-laden IF chain to get a couple more dB when you can go to Radio
Shack and buy 20 dB and a hamburger for $5?

I am a strong proponent of CHEAP test lash-ups that provide a go/no-go initial
test on surplus gear.  It saddens me when people spend hundreds of dollars
testing and tweaking a tin-can radio when they could have put a nickel bandaid
on it, had some fun, and put the money toward a nice rig -- either a modern
rig or a classic that's worth the time and money.

BTW, is there any place in the country where there's enough 6 meter traffic
for adjacent-channel rejection to be a factor?

Jim N6OTQ



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:12 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 2m HT -  Is it a good by for the price?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <41jaih$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 16:07:12 GMT
Lines: 29
Sender: [e-mail]

Bill Blohm ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Jim, you reminded me of the one beef I have.  The memories are OK for my
: area and so not a problem, but I do wish the keyboard was lighted!!!!
: The display lights up OK and is readable, but given when I use it in
: emergency drills and such, a lighted keypad is a must in my next HT.
: The original poster should consider this as well.  Otherwise, I still
: consider it a good buy, and agree with the others that the original
: poster should wait for the next sale.  I'm hoping to get my boy one for
: himself for Christmas, so I'm waiting for a sale near then, myself.

Good point, Bill.  I don't use autopatch, but I can definitely see the need
for lighted buttons.

Which brings up another point for the originator of this thread...the
battery dies, virtually without warning.  It has cut me off in
mid-coversation more than once.

My wife just became a ham, and she bought a Yaesu FT-11R this weekend at the
Southwestern Division ARRL Convention.  With its many features, I'm
beginning to hope that both my 202 and 404 die, so I'll have a reason to buy
the FT-51R.  :)

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:13 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gvls1!rossi
From: [e-mail] (Pete Rossi)
Subject: FS: Radio Shack HTX-404  440 MHz HT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: gvlf6-a
Organization: Loral Defense Systems-Eagan  -  Paoli, PA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 18:56:50 GMT
Lines: 19


RS HTX-404 440 MHz HT for sale --- Works and looks like new

   includes...
      standard NiCad battery pack (good condition)
      standard antenna
      belt clip
      wall charger
      cigarette lighter cord
      manual

$170 + UPS COD shipping

---

Pete Rossi - WA3NNA
[e-mail]
Loral Defense Systems-Eagan    (formerly  Unisys Government Systems Group)
Valley Forge Engineering Center - Paoli, Pennsylvania


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (jdb )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: 6 Sep 1995 20:33:32 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <42l0is$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bir-al1-26.ix.netcom.com

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Bruce A. Pope)
writes:
>
>
>>:> Now we did not go so far as to say you cannot but a 2M FM rig
>>:>because you only have a Novice ticket..No..If you held a license
you
>>:>could buy anything in the store...no license...receiving gear only.
>>:>We were sued by two people who wanted to buy 440 HT's....They
>>:>lost.
>
>Now there's a brilliant idea.  I guess a novice is more "qualified" to
>own a transmitter that transmits in the Advanced class bands than a
>SWL...


 Yep. he sure is... He has a stake in following the regulations.
Violate them, risk loosing his license as well as being fined..
A lot of hard work and effort went into getting that license...
Few will risk loosing it..
An SWl has no risk othe than a fine...He has no license to
loose.

>Although I realize the rights of business owners to make up their own
>rules, I exercise my right to go elsewhere whenever I hear policies
>like this from ham stores.  Having experienced it before I was
licensed
>(buying a TNC, not even a transmitter...), you won't find me spending
>my hard earned cash around those places now that i'm "allowed".


 You would have been allowed to purchase all the non-transmitting
equipment you wanted in our store...
In the 20 years I owned the store, until my partner died, we lost
only 4 sales because of our policy..
2 people sued us and lost...
2 people bought gear from the place that sends out those
nice slick catalogs with locations in several places..
They were caught, fined, and lost all their equipment
to the FCC....who later auctioned it off to "Licensed Amateurs"
only...




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 95 20:36:54 GMT
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Bruce A. Pope) wrote:

> . . . you won't find me spending my hard earned cash around those
>places now that i'm "allowed".

Then I assume you won't complain the next time an illegal CB'er
clobbers you on 10M with the gear he bought from the dealers you
patronize?

73,

Jack WB3U


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!gatech!stallion.jsums.edu!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (JimP911)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need S-38C Manual
Date: 6 Sep 1995 20:52:38 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 7
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42lfom$[e-mail]>
References: <41tv26$3lj$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

Need a copy of  the manual for a Hallicrafters S-38C.  I will reimburse
all postage and copying costs to whoever helps me out.

Thanks & 73

Jim KC1SJ
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (llu10)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco DR-610T Mods Needed, Please
Date: 6 Sep 1995 21:35:07 GMT
Organization: Infinet L.C.
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <42l46b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h_adapt.roanoke.infi.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

I have recently purchased an Alinco DR-610 T and would like to know if there are any
modifications to extend rx. (800mhz ?)

Thanks in advance for any help.


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:18 1995
From: [e-mail] (Stephen M Trapp)
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 00:16:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Ham from Uzbekistan needs contacts
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news.alt.net!news.serv.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!col.hp.com!news.corp.hp.com!hpcc01!trapps
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 11

Hi,

You might want to contact the American Radio Relay League, I think
they are arrl.org and see what clubs they have in the area.
I am sure they are on internet, and probably have a web page now.
I'd think with all the engineering students, the university must have
a ham club, maybe the student center would have info (nice equipment too!).

73,
Steve, N4DG



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:18 1995
From: [e-mail] (Stephen M Trapp)
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 00:20:40 GMT
Subject: Re: HELP SAVE LIVES - Info wanted
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news.alt.net!news.serv.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!col.hp.com!news.corp.hp.com!hpcc01!trapps
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
References: <42ejrl$[e-mail]>
Lines: 12

Hi,

I have seen some 49 MHz sets (VHF-line of sight) at Radio Shack.
They were earphones with attached mikes, could probably be used
without arms if they have voice activated transmit (VOX).

The range of something like that is almost 1 mile if you are near
line of sight to each other (It can bend around obstacles maybe 10 feet).

Good Luck,
Steve



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!parsifal.nando.net!usenet
From: DB Wilhelm <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Comments about Rapid Chargers
Date: 7 Sep 1995 02:16:42 GMT
Organization: News & Observer Public Access
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <42lkma$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grail513.nando.net

[e-mail] (Larry Flader) wrote:
>
> Hello. I was wondering if anyone has any comments about rapid chargers? Are
> they good/bad for batteries etc.
>
>       Thx .   VE7YAF

I have been using rapid chargers for the batteries used in cordless
drills for the last 5 years.  My use is everyday, as a professional
woodworker, I use cordless drills a lot.  I have a total of 5 of the
them, with two batteries for each.  Over this period, I have had only
one of the batteries go bad (and that one was a "no-name" brand.

My conclusion is that a well designed rapid charger will not harm
the batteries that it was designed to charge.  Make sure the charger
has the proper sensors to monitor battery voltage and shut-down
when the proper voltage has been reached.  Current limits for the
initial part of the charging cycle are also important for long
battery life.

73,
Don W3FPR


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com!nntp-hub.barrnet.net!varian.com !usenet
From: Peter Bealo <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
Date: 7 Sep 1995 12:47:00 GMT
Organization: Varian Ion Implant Systems
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <42mpk4$[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: portland_hd.iis.varian.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; U; 16bit)

I suspect you are wrong (in fact I know you are) about not being able to
refuse to sell a transmitter to a non-ham.

A business owner has the absolute right not to accept someone as a
customer for any reason except ethnicity, color, religion and gender. If
I wanted (and I don't, by the way) I could elect not to sell my product
to anyone coming into my store wearing purple, and this would be OK so
long as the prospective customer could not prove that wearing purple was
somehow directly linked to the above issues.

Now, if you as a licenced ham do not like the policy of a store not to
sell a particular product to non-hams, you have the absolute right to
take your business elsewhere. Personally, I wouldn't walk out of that
store without congratulating the owner for what I believe is a sound
policy.

Peter WB2MJG  Plaistow NH

The opinions expressed here are my own, not my employer's. They don't pay
me to have opinions.




From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Muenzler, Kevin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: HTX100 schem or transverter mods??
Date: 7 Sep 1995 13:35:18 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Lines: 23
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.cs.utexas.edu
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16705 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9362

 [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr) writes:

 -Hi,
 -Does anyone have a schematic for the Radio Shack HTX100 10 meter rig,
 -or has anyone added seperate low-level transmit and recieve?
 -I'd like to use mine for a 28mhz tunable if for a DEM 432 mhz IF
transverter.
 -
 -Thanks,
 -Joe - AA3GN

You can go to your "friendly" neighborhood Radio Shack store and
ask for a Service Manual for your HTX-100.  They cost around $15.
This is the book that is used by the service technician.
I think you can also call 1-800-THE-SHACK and order it on your
credit card.  It won't have anything about modifications but it has
a detailed schematic.  As far as the low level transmit you might
be able to modify the output section for low level output.
I guess you are looking for the milliwatt range.  It might be easier
to build a 30db attenuator.

Kevin, WB5RUE
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!interlog.com!polaris.net!nntp.cntfl.com!news.fsu.edu!news.fsu.edu!brunson
From: [e-mail] (Eric Brunson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: VHS Band questions
Date: 07 Sep 1995 14:14:42 GMT
Organization: SCRI, Florida State University
Lines: 44
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sun1.scri.fsu.edu


I know this is a little off topic, but I posted first to r.r.cb and
got exactly zero response.  Since I know you guys are a lot more
knowlegable, I'm hoping someone might have some info they could give
me. Skip the first question about the CB and just go to the VHS and
licensing question.  Thanks a bunch.

Original post:

Hi,
 I'm pretty new to radios, etc. but I've got a couple of questions
that I hope someone could answer.

 First, I'm looking at a handheld CB unit in the damark catalog
(Uniden Pro 340XL if anyone is interested) and it has a switchable
power output of 1W or 4W.  I know that the antenna makes a great deal
of difference, what kind of useful range could I expect out of that
unit?

 Second, the other option I'm looking at is a pair of Motorola 1W red
and blue dot (VHF) walkie talkies.  I know we'd need to get class 3
radio operators licences to use them, so: a) could I expect better or
worse range between the two of them (the blurb says up to 2 miles) and
b) What is entailed in getting the license?

 And, finally, (and maybe I should have asked this first) what I need
these things for is, first, to communicate with another car during a
cross country move, and then I want to be able to use them on the ski
slopes, just to keep in touch if our group splits into two. With this
in mind, can anyone tell me if I'm way off base, and I need to rethink
my philosophy, or else can someone make a recommendation for a pair of
resonably sized, not to cumbersome units that would fit the bill.

Thanks for the input,
e.

--
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Eric Brunson                        Ya know... It's amazing how
[e-mail]                far you can shove a convertible
                                    under a bus at a mere 15mph.





From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need advice for good apartment HF antenna
Date: 7 Sep 1995 15:32:46 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 7
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42nhcu$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

HELP! I am about to move into a 2nd floor apartment (with a balcony) and
am trying to decide what to do for an HF antenna. Thought about setting up
one of the "ISO-loops" (or the MFJ version) on the balcony, but they won't
go to 40 meters, which I want. Has anyone tried using a mobile HF antenna
(like the outbacker) sitting on a balcony? I thought about trying to
install a dipole in the attic, but I'd rather not go that route unless I
have to.  Any advice/comments are greatly appreciated.


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:25 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: AEA PK-232MBX & Yaesu FT-736R
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <42klmo$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 15:55:25 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16702 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10362

In article <42klmo$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kory Hamzeh) writes:
>I have a AEA PK232 TNC and a Yaesu FT-736R rig. The 736 has data in/out jack
>for TNCs. This method bypasses the FM modulaters pre-emphasis and de-emphasis
>circuits. Its suppose to be better, unless the TNC already compensates
>for this, in which case it would be worse. The Yaesu manual states that
>most TNC-2 clones already do the compensation and I believe the PK232 is
>a TNC-2 clone. I've been trying for two days now to call AEA and ask them
>this question, but the tech support lines are *constantly* busy.

The PK-232 isn't even *close* to being a TNC-2 clone. It uses an
entirely different modem design. But it does still have tone twist
at 1200 baud. At least, unlike the TNC-2, the twist is in the
*correct* direction to compensate for the radio's emphasis/demphasis
circuits in the microphone amplifier. The MF10 in the TNC-2 is setup
to give exactly backward twist, no wonder people have problems. Ideally,
you want to supply flat twist to the modulator, but given all those other
people out there with backward twist, leaving the twist as is on the
PK-232 isn't a bad idea.

>The main reason that I want to hook up my TNC this way is that I don't
>have to plug/unplug the TNC and Mic and Speaker jacks. I know I can buy
>a switch box from MFJ, but then thats two more gadgets that I really don't
>need.

Unfortunately, most TNCs don't mute tx audio when they are idle, and
I believe the PK-232 is no exception in this regard. That means if
you try to use the mic while the TNC is powered, you'll get random
packet tones mixed with your speech. So power down the TNC before
trying to talk. Conversely, the 736 doesn't mute the mic when you
transmit tones from the TNC, so either be very very quiet, or unplug
the mic when doing packet. Seems you can't win in your quest to
avoid a switchbox or plugging and unplugging cables.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!newsserver.read.tasc.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Richard A. Cuti)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: PC card for receiving wwv time signal
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 1995 16:45:01 GMT
Organization: TASC
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <42n7ih$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: racuti.read.tasc.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (Marvin Kelly) wrote:

>Does anyone know where I can buy a PC card that receives the govt
>time signal and keeps my PC clock in sync? I saw something like this
>advertised years ago but cannot find it. Ideally, it would TCP/IP
>software so the PC can act as a network time server.

Marvin,

        There is a WWV Timing Receiver called the TimeLink3 by a company
called TrueTime that hooks up to a PC via the serial port.

        It is marketed by:

                Personal Computing Tools
                90 Industrial Park Road
                Hingham, MA  02043
                1-800-767-6728 (Voice)
                617-740-2728 (Fax)

        If you call them up, they will fax you the spec sheets.

                        73
                        Rich
                        N1QVT






+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Richard A. Cuti               Internet: [e-mail]               |
|  55 Walkers Brook Drive   Amateur Radio: N1QVT                         |
|  Reading, MA 01867       Packet Address: N1QVT@WA1PHY.#EMA.MA.USA.NOAM |
|                                                                        |
|    Opinions are strictly those of me, myself and I and we all agree!   |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.2

mQCNAy/6xEAAAAEEALNaS1r17pI10s8JS1UPEydvbL8k1hXOb7PoS/Snf1B2Iu9C
beLEYYI1wbFFPIG4uXqOcmTZ9fMFcfpHiiU7wOJVLOCsFzK9ryZes4PUruffgUZK
z4h8/UG9g6BPxCOMNeYT34hcc9x2BQmg23p/q1TND4i5gOjhW5NIIE7oOuHFAAUR
tA9SaWNoYXJkIEEuIEN1dGk=
=v95g
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!cs.utk.edu!gaia.ns.utk.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Alinco DR-112
Date: 7 Sep 1995 18:18:57 GMT
Organization: UT Computing Help Desk
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <42nd2h$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: hdesk001.ct.utk.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5

I was wondering if any mods are available for this rig.  I realize this is an
older rig, however, I just purchased it and would like an answer.
Thanks for helping.
Bob Werner KC4URW
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Amateur:  KC4URW@N4QEA.#METN.TN.USA.NA



From [e-mail] Thu Sep 07 16:49:28 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203> <[e-mail]> <42fafa$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 19:50:05 GMT
Lines: 26
Sender: [e-mail]

Jeffrey D. Stai ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Here are some LA repeaters that I either have experience with, or have been told
: that they are functional by reasonably reputable hams:

: 52.80RX/52.30TX PL 82.5     N6FFI
: 52.74RX/52.24TX PL 127.3    N6ENL
: 52.86RX/52.36TX             KC6WGR (So Cal 6m Club)
: 52.56RX/52.06TX             ditto

I had an opportunity to get some good local info on 6m this weekend, during
a talk promoting that band, at the ARRL Southwestern Division Convention on
the Queen Mary.  One of the handouts was a lengthy (one page, both sides)
repeater listing for SoCal.  If anyone is interested, it would probably be
much easier to FAX it than to enter the info on here.

Anyway, one of the points brought up was that the 6m repeaters in the LA
area are mostly high-level, and it's a good idea to have 50 watts or more
to do any useful work.  Just thought I'd toss that in.

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: John Shuster <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kantronics Rock Hound
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 95 22:07:56 -0500
Organization: Delphi ([e-mail] email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1b.delphi.com

I picked up a Kantronics rock hound QRP unit.  It has
a 40 meter novice band crystal, a key jack, and a
female RCA jack marked "antenna".  Where do I
attach a power supply?  I called Kantronics and the
only help they could give me was to say that they
stopped making it in 1976.  Makes me want to buy
one of their TNC's...8^(.

Any help appreciated.

John in Seattle    KC7CKP


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Joanne Dow)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Date: 7 Sep 1995 06:16:13 GMT
Organization: Delphi Internet Services Corporation
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <42m2nd$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Joanne Dow)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bix.com
X-Newsreader: NetBix 1.153
X-Newsreader-Author: [e-mail] (Loren Wilton)
    This message has been posted with development version software.
    If there are any problems with the message format, send me mail.

In article <[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (WB3U) wrote:
>In article <[e-mail]>,
>   [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>>Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?
>
>The FCC doesn't allow it.

That did not stop an enterprising collection of CBers out here in wonderful So
Cal from building one and operating it *5 YEARS* before the FCC managed to nail
'em and firmly slap some wrists. (This went down a fair number of years ago
now.)

{^_^}     Joanne Dow     The Wizardess



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 8 Sep 1995 22:58:49 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 51
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42qvt9$[e-mail]>
References: <42pi3s$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42pi3s$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Victor Liguori ) writes:

>People can buy guns that can kill (so can a knife), but it is the
>responabilty of the owner not to break the law. Most owners of guns and
>knifes do not go and kill someone. There is no law against owning a HAM
>tranceiver without a ham licence.

                          So can a pencil, a rock, a 2x4, a 12" Woofer,
etc....
                          or you can choke on a Nerf football I suppose.

Good point.  It's a simple concept, but one that escapes many.  The whole
concept of personal responsibilty is totally foreign to so many people in
the 90's.  The whole firearms debate a good example.  This is neither the
time or the place to discuss firearms, and I will not, but it serves as a
good example.  Too many people see a little, insignificant non-problem,
and immediatly start whining to their legislators (or the ARRL) and
newspapers declaring a problem a "crisis" that needs immidiate attention.
Lawmakers all to eager to find a vote, jump in, write a new law or two,
get some free TV coverage, and declare it solved.  What's even scarrier,
we believe it!  How about the ECPA of 1984? Or the ban on amplifiers
capable of opeation between 26 and 30 MHz.  If an example of extreme
stupidity is required, how about the 55 MPH speed limit?  Would anybody
really trust congress with writing a law as to who and who shall not be
able to purchase Amateur Radio equipment?  Or worse yet, the Executive
branch to issue an Executive order?  Not that the executive branch has the
time or the interest, they have neither, but on a slow news day, who
knows?

I for one am quite willing to put up with a little intentional or
malicious interference from an unlicensed operator rather than to have
even more of my few remaining rights disolved by yet another stupid,
poorly conceived, poorly implemented, poorly written law, to solve a
problem that doesn't exist.  I am quite sure that anybody who has spent
any time on the radio has probably been the recipiant of malicious /
intentional interference from many more licensed operators than
unlicensed.

A store owner may now decide on his or her own, without the rule of law,
not to sell amateur equipment to an unlicensed individual. Whatever path
he or she chooses, is allright with me, great, I honestly don't care.
Sadly though, the store owner will in all probabilty end up in court on
some kind of a make believe discrimination charge, because the law doesn't
"specifically prohibit" the selling of Amateur Radio equipment to
unlicensed individuals. Aren't the 90's great?  So what's it going to be?
More bad laws, or personal freedoms?  I'll take the latter, with the
associated risks and  pitfalls that come with it, thankyou.

Pat, "OH, I'VE BEEN OFFENDED, CALL MY LAWYER" , KE1C



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: High Voltage Power Supply
Date: 9 Sep 1995 01:58:14 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 9
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42radm$[e-mail]>
References: <42ms27$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42ms27$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
writes:

>
>Is this a switching supply?
>
>73 Tom

Hello? Are you there?


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 9 Sep 1995 13:43:28 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 18
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42sjo0$[e-mail]>
References: <42seug$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42seug$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
writes:

>But then who knows in this crazy world? It ain't over til the fat lady
>sues (used to be "sings").

Good Lord, that's a great one.  Tom, do I have your permission to use that
in casual conversation?  I almost wet my pants laughing so hard when I
read it.

 That's why I'm
>voting the Ted Kennedy-Don King ticket. Preferential treatment must be
>stopped. We need to improved moral fiber in our leaders.
>
Huh?  That one totally escapes me.  Is that so toungue in cheek that it
flew over my head?

Pat


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!koala.scott.net!acara.snsnet.net!news5.crl.com!nntp.crl.com!tcomeng.tcomeng.com!pagesat.net!news.companet.net!usenet
From: Kim Ivey <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Subject: Re: AEA PK-232MBX & Yaesu FT-736R
Date: 9 Sep 1995 16:04:17 GMT
Organization: COMPANET
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <42sdu2$[e-mail]>
References: <42klmo$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: comsrv-119.companet.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16785 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10404

I may not be of any help to you on the FT-736R infor, but I have a FT-990
and it has 2 different "data" ports on the rear of the radio. One is for
rtty and the other is for packet. The packet port is a 5 pin din plug. I
use this port for all the digital communications. When I press the PKT
button on the front panel, it selects the LSB as well. This port is
active at all times, it also disables the mic port. I talked to the
Yaesu reps at a local hamfest and they said this would work fine.

I may not have understood your inquery fully, however when you hook
the TNC to the FT-736R just try to put the rig in the FM mode instead of
the pkt.

Hope this info will help.

If you want to reply to me the my e-mail address is [e-mail].
I just happen to notice that i was connected on my daughters address.

Good luck!!!

Joe Ivey, kk4qi
14488 Parker Road
Athens, al.  35611



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!oronet!news
From: [e-mail] (Jim Weir)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Audio question
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1995 19:06:18 GMT
Organization: RST Engineering
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <42solo$[e-mail]>
References: <42ghdf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: @rst-engr.oro.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55

[e-mail] (Ken Becker) wrote:

>I know this is not the right place,but I am sure many of you are familiar
>with what I am trying to figure out.  I have a quadraphonic preamp-tuner,
>and I want to use the AUX input for two sources of high impedance signal,
>a TV and a CD player. i would rather use a y connector than to have to
>build an  "a/b" switch, and I will never be playing the TV at tthethe same
>time as the CD player, I am concerned about the resisitance of the unused
>source loading down the circuit, or causing distortion.  Am I worrying
>unneccessarily? Thanks for any advice. BTW each unit works fine through
>the aux input now.

>--

>Ken Becker
>[e-mail]

Sorry that ASCII gives such a lousy way to answer, but I'm going to
have to do it with words instead of pictures -- so stand by for
thousands of words!!

Terminate both the TV and the CD player with what they "want" to see
in the way of load resistance with a real resistor.  Then run two
resistors from these loaded outputs in a "Y" and into the preamp.  The
values of these resistors should be the value of the input impedance
of the preamp or lower so you don't lose a lot of signal.  Most
preamps are designed with 10K and above input impedances.  If you
can't find the input impedance in the specs, just take one of the
sources and put resistors in series with the input until you can
"just" hear a decrease in loudness.  This is 6 dB, or so close to it
you won't care.  This value is the input impedance of the preamp.

Sorry it took so much bandwidth to do what 5 schematic symbols would
have done, but oh, well...

Jim



Jim Weir VP Engineering  | "I turned to my wife, as startled as the
RST Engineering          | pilot by what I'd seen.  Dirt-streaked,
Grass Valley CA 95945    | glorious, she smiled at me, tear-bright
voice/fax [phone]   | radiance.  'Richie, they're going to try
[e-mail]         | for it!' she said, "Wish them love!'" (Bach)



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.cerf.net!nntp-server.caltech.edu!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!medulla.ama.ttuhsc.edu!cortex!william
From: william@cortex (William Biggs)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-736 Comments Please
Date: 9 Sep 1995 23:17:00 GMT
Organization: Texas Tech University HSC Amarillo
Lines: 24
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42t79c$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cortex.ama.ttuhsc.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Jon Burt ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Ed,
: I just bought a IC-736 about 6 weeks ago. It was a big step up from
: my old Ft-101ee! I think its a great radio, and I enjoy it, but If
: I were to do it over, I think I would buy the 738 instead. 6m is nice
: to have, but not too much there... The main problem w/ the 736 is the
: lack of portability due to the built in power supply... of course, that
: is also a feature. Good Luck!
: 73 de Jon
: KC4UKK

My only beef is the rudimentary PL tone board available. If you need to
get into more than one 6m repeater , pray that they use the same PL tone.

The tone board option is programmed by soldering jumpers !

Not something you can exactly do on the fly !


--
William C. Biggs , MD
KC5JIF                            Howdy from the High Plains of Texas
1900 South Coulter Drive
Amarillo, TX 79106


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Guy Scott )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
Date: 9 Sep 1995 23:25:19 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <42t7ov$[e-mail]>
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-wpb-fl1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 09  4:25:19 PM PDT 1995

In <42mkub$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Brad
Mitchel) writes:
>
>
>Hello all, I was considering buying a Scout for my vehicle, but
>I ran accros a ham who sent his back because of the fact that
>the radio compensates for it's frequency in 100 HZ increments
>right in the middle of a word.
>Now the question is..

>73 Brad WB8YGG
>
>
>[e-mail]

  Ive been using my scout mobile in a lifted Suzuki Samarai (AKA Rides
like a rock!)  only drift problem that Ive encounterd is when I drift
over to the side of the road my hf antenna gets torn off by those
occasional trees.
  Henry KE4WBW


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!EOLPC.pennet.net!elmer
From: [e-mail] (Elmer O. Laudenslager, III)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IBM-AT 286 computer "quiet" for HF?
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 00:31:22 LOCAL
Organization: Microserve Information Systems (800)-380-INET
Lines: 64
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42af2e$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: elmerl.pennet.net
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) writes:

>In article <42af2e$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mparkes) writes:
>>I have an opportunity to buy an IBM -AT model 5170, 286 computer which I
>>want to use on HF digital modes (amtor, pactor, Clover) using the HAL P38
>>board. Does anyone have any knowledge if this was a QUIET computer? I
>>don't want to buy something that's going to be generating a lot of noise
>>on HF. Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
>>73's Mike KS4DA

>That's an old boat anchor machine. It's not particularly quiet,
>but can be made so with sufficient shielding effort. In general,
>modern motherboards are quieter than older ones because they
>use multilayer construction with internal ground planes, and
>because they use lower power parts. The case on that old machine
>is pretty solid compared to some of the mostly plastic new ones,
>however, and you can apply standard shielding techniques to
>contain the noise inside the case.

>Most of the noise that will bother you on HF, however, typically
>comes from the monitor. The latest "green" monitors are usually
>quieter than older monitors. And color monitors are somewhat
>easier to shield than monochrome monitors.

>It's difficult to make recomendations by model on which computers
>are quiet and which aren't. There's too much variation in the
>details of assembly that matter most. Two computers by the same
>manufacturer, built on the same day, can have widely different
>noise output. A lot depends on the "bite" of the screws holding
>the case together. Good shielding practice requires a solid
>electrical connection along all seams. For painted cabinets with
>few screws, that's really iffy. If you sand the paint off of
>mating surfaces, and use a screw every two inches along the
>seams, most any computer can be made quiet. Of course external
>cables can radiate like mad. You need to use shielded cables,
>with connectors with shielded hoods, and a ferrite bead or
>two won't hurt either.

>One thing that likely *won't* help is "grounding" the computer.
>That just supplies another conductive path along which the
>noise can radiate, and can create ground loops that make the
>noise worse, though sometimes you can "short out" an existing
>ground loop by using a direct ground connection. (There's nothing
>magic about ground that sucks noise away.)

While I agree in general with what you have stated above,  I feel that you
will find that the IBM AT computer will be very quiet on HF for you.  I have
had one of the IBM AT's and it along with the NEC 1401 EGA monitor, never
bothered my HF equipment (Kenwood 830s and Yaesu 757).

The IBM 286 computer system is a finely crafted computer in a case that is
electrically shielded and very quiet.  I wish I still had the computer.  I
think that if I were you however, I'd consider getting the computer but
yanking out the IBM motherboard and replacing it with one of the new 486 or
pentium motherboards and components.

Yep, wish I still had that machine.

73's, Elmer -- N3DQC

Elmer O. Laudenslager, III -- AS/400 Programmer/Analyst/Webmaster
New MMI Corporation            Personal
http://www.newmmi.com/         http://www.pennet.net/resident/elmer/
mailto:[e-mail]    mailto:[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ns1.win.net!bdam!cingersn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Carleton C. Ingerson)
From: [e-mail] (Carleton C. Ingerson)
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 00:52:02 GMT
Subject: YAESU FT-411 Manual
Lines: 9

I just picked up a Yaesu FT-411 at a hamfest and am looking for a
copy of the manual. Will gladly pay copy and shipping costs.
Please reply via E-MAIL.

73

Carl
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!ptracy
From: [e-mail] (PTRACY)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (PTRACY)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 50


newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 8 Sep 1995 18:05:06 -0400
Message-ID: <42qemi$[e-mail]>
In article <42mrtt$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mike
Stansberry) writes:

>  Lots of folks put down
>the R.S. H.T.s because they won't receive/transmit out of the ham
>bands.  I have a scanner to listen out of band, and I'm not licensed
>to transmit out of the ham bands.  Go for it.

I for one wish that MORE VHF /UHF tranceivers wouldn't go out of band.  As
much fun as they are, my own personal experiance with Kenwood, Icom, and
Alinco is that the front ends, if there are any ,are broad as a barn door.
 I have tried 3 different radios on from my fixed / home location, and
every one of them gets wiped out.  Useless as tits on a bull.  Front end
overload.  A ham band only tranceiver would at least have the possibility
of having some kind of front end selectivity.  Granted, a radio made for
mobile operation can't be expected to perform as well as or be as
selective as a "base" style radio, but they sure could be alot better.
The only radio I have that works while hooked up to an outside gain
antenna is a 20+ year old ICOM IC-230 which has helical resonators in the
front end.  Unfortunately, it does'nt do the 145 sub-band, and does not
have any built in CTCSS tones.  My only other option for a 2 Meter radio,
if I ever really feel the need, is an old GE MASTR II with an outboard
synthesizer.  Yech.

Many questions have been posted about out of band mods for this radio or
that radio, and my favorite response, and one that I agree wholeheartedly
with, is the "Tape a scanner to the back side of your radio" type of
reply.

BTW, how many of you guys have a single or dual band radio with the out of
band mods done, (rx AND tx) have accidently transmitted someplace you
really shouldn't be?  Hmmmm.  Just curious.


--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gordon.couger
From: [e-mail] (GORDON COUGER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GORDON COUGER)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 56


From: [e-mail] (Gordon Couger)
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 8 Sep 1995 23:20:40 GMT
Message-ID: <42qj48$[e-mail]>
At $199 this month they are a great buy.
Gordon AB5DG
In article <42qemi$[e-mail]>, PTracy <[e-mail]> wrote:
>In article <42mrtt$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mike
>Stansberry) writes:
>
>>  Lots of folks put down
>>the R.S. H.T.s because they won't receive/transmit out of the ham
>>bands.  I have a scanner to listen out of band, and I'm not licensed
>>to transmit out of the ham bands.  Go for it.
>
>I for one wish that MORE VHF /UHF tranceivers wouldn't go out of band.  As
>much fun as they are, my own personal experiance with Kenwood, Icom, and
>Alinco is that the front ends, if there are any ,are broad as a barn door.
> I have tried 3 different radios on from my fixed / home location, and
>every one of them gets wiped out.  Useless as tits on a bull.  Front end
>overload.  A ham band only tranceiver would at least have the possibility
>of having some kind of front end selectivity.  Granted, a radio made for
>mobile operation can't be expected to perform as well as or be as
>selective as a "base" style radio, but they sure could be alot better.
>The only radio I have that works while hooked up to an outside gain
>antenna is a 20+ year old ICOM IC-230 which has helical resonators in the
>front end.  Unfortunately, it does'nt do the 145 sub-band, and does not
>have any built in CTCSS tones.  My only other option for a 2 Meter radio,
>if I ever really feel the need, is an old GE MASTR II with an outboard
>synthesizer.  Yech.
>
>Many questions have been posted about out of band mods for this radio or
>that radio, and my favorite response, and one that I agree wholeheartedly
>with, is the "Tape a scanner to the back side of your radio" type of
>reply.
>
>BTW, how many of you guys have a single or dual band radio with the out of
>band mods done, (rx AND tx) have accidently transmitted someplace you
>really shouldn't be?  Hmmmm.  Just curious.
>

Gordon Couger - 624 Cheyenne, Stillwater, OK 74075
[e-mail] 405-624-2855 evenings
    I do not speak for my employer

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!palmer.cbs
From: [e-mail] (PALMER CBS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Anyone on 900 Mhz?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (PALMER CBS)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 31


.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Palmer CBS)
Subject: Re: Anyone on 900 Mhz?
Date: 8 Sep 1995 20:52:40 -0400
Message-ID: <42qogo$[e-mail]>
There is life on 900 Mhz, but I doubt if you will find any commercial gear
to get on that band.

Most of the activity 0n 902 Mhz. is USB operated by the VHF / UHF buffs.
The only way I'm aware of to get on that band is to use a transverter and
a 2M all-mode as the i.f. rig.

Down East Microwave sells 902 transverter kits which are very simple to
assemble and get on the air. There are also 902 loop yagi antennas
available for that band.

I work 6 thru 2304, and I think you will find 902 to be the least
populated of all the VHF / UHF bands, but there is good activity there
during contests and good tropo openings.

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!bill.phelps
From: [e-mail] (BILL PHELPS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS heathkit gear
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BILL PHELPS)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 28


totrbbs!bill.phelps
From: [e-mail] (Bill Phelps)
Subject: FS heathkit gear
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 8 Sep 95 22:49:00 GMT
Hello Jim,and i hope you get this,as i am new at all this net
stuff......:).I might be interested in your 101.amd power supply.My name
is Bill Phelps at 404-361-3111.So,sounds like you are at least in 4
land.So,call me collect and we can talk.So,thanks a lot and have a nice
weekend,Jim.
[e-mail]

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!bryan.smart
From: [e-mail] (BRYAN SMART)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BRYAN SMART)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 26


From: [e-mail] (Bryan Smart)
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1995 00:10:42 -0500
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
I remember someone saying a couple of posts back that they prefered some
Kenwood units over the RS one due to their shirt-pocket size.  My question
is, how much transmit power do you give up by going this route, and how
thick of bloves must you wear while transmitting to avoid the heat <G>.

KE4QQN

--
Bryan Smart
Email: [e-mail]

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!token
From: [e-mail] (TOKEN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM-255A Mods?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (TOKEN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 34


From: <[e-mail]>
Subject: Kenwood TM-255A Mods?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 05:13:12 GMT
Just wondering if anyone has any mods, at all, for the TM-255A.

I have had mine for a while now and am very pleased with it.  But I am
interested in any way it can be improved.

Also, does anyone know if kenwood is going to produce a transverter
to go with the 1.2 GHz and 2.4 GHz readout capability of this rig?

73s and good day.

***********************************************************
*  Darrell Leach--------*---1984 GL-1200A-----------------*
*  Ridgecrest, Ca-------*---123,000 miles and still going *
*  KD6LRC---------------*---. . .and going. . .and going. *
*  --------email: [e-mail]------------*
***********************************************************



--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 69


From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: What good is 6 Meters?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 04:43:15 GMT
In article <orbelld-3008951615150001@204.41.1.203> [e-mail]
(David Orbell) writes:
>  My interest in 6m is growing........thought I'd throw out a few questions
>going through my mind.
>
>  Is a multi mode 6M rig worth the expense(when I don't have an HF rig
>that will take a 6M model) or do most just work FM?
>Do most just work simplex, or work repeaters?

The 6 meter operation mix is similar to what you find on 10 meters.
Lots of SSB, some CW, and a good bit of FM repeating. An all-mode
is worthwhile. The band is open less often than 10 meters, but when
it is, it's almost as good. There's also some radio control activity
for models on 6 that's missing from 10 meters, and 6 excells for
meteor scatter operation since the required electron density almost
perfectly matches what's available from typical meteor trails.

>Do operaters on 6M  have problems  causing interference on the TV
>frequencies?(I've heard that used to be a problem)

Yes, it still is, even with cable. Low power operation annoys the
fewest neighbors. Mobile operation typically annoys more people,
but for shorter periods, and they're less likely to know who you
are and where you live, so the chance of revenge is less.

>Why do many 6M Rigs only operate on 10 watts?

It's the power limit for Class B Japanese licensees. The US
demand for 6 meter equipment isn't large enough for most
Japanese companies to produce a separate higher powered rig.
Though there is a trend toward the 100 watt class in multimodes,
at a premium price, and in rigs that include 6 meters with HF
coverage where the same PA module can be used with only a tuned
circuit change.

As an aside, logic dictates that there are only 3 worthwhile
amateur power levels, 10 watts, 100 watts, and 1000 watts,
though some would argue for 1 watt to be included for HTs.
Each is a 10 db step from the other, and that's the smallest
really noticable change in power. Of course there are those
who struggle for every femtowatt differential, but it's usually
a waste of effort. (Not always, of course, there are marginal
situations where a small power increment makes the difference,
but they're more exceptions than rules, especially when skywave
propagation is involved.) Some would argue for 5 watts, 50 watts,
and 500 watts as the steps instead, and I wouldn't disagree.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 2m HT -
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 58


From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 2m HT -  Is it a good by for the price?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 05:09:39 GMT
In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Ken
Harrison) writes:
>[e-mail] ([e-mail]) wrote:
>> I would appreciate your comments on the Radio Shack 2m Handheld
>> transceiver.
>> I'm a rank beginner with my new tech licence, looking for my
>> first rig.
>
>Not to send you off the track of a HTX-202, but I've just heard about
>the 4th radio in my county going on the blink.  Intermittent transmit.
>All the same problem.  The latest one is 3 months old.  Whenever used
>on 12 V. it is on a mobile 5/8 antenna.

Ah, this is the "ERR 2" problem, right? It's caused by RF feedback.
Use of a properly thru-hole mounted mobile antenna, properly matched,
will eliminate this. High supply voltage (equates to high output
power) with the rubber dummy load can also cause an ERR 2 condition.
The VCO is being driven out of lock by the RF feedback. Resetting
the radio will recover from this condition without resort to the
service center. (Better VCO shielding, or smarter firmware recovery,
would avoid this annoyance, but no radio is perfect.)

>It is reported that the HTX-202 is very good in a high RF environment.  It
>tends to not suffer from intermod interference.  This might be something
>to consider, too.

This is the outstanding feature of the unit. The HTX-202 is simply
the best current production amateur HT in this regard. The 202 is
not as nice as many other HTs on the market in most respects, but
the freedom from intermod can make it the best choice for many
urban hams.

(I have no axe to grind, I'm using a different brand myself because
I need dual band capability, but this is a good radio and I wish
my dualbander were as free from intermod.)

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!brian.felt
From: [e-mail] (BRIAN FELT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-530 Mod...?  Please He
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (BRIAN FELT)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 30


lcyon.com!usenet
From: Brian Felt <[e-mail]>
Subject: FT-530 Mod...?  Please Help
Date: 9 Sep 1995 06:11:48 GMT
Message-ID: <42rb74$[e-mail]>
I have had my Yaesu FT-530 handheld for a year and a half now and
recently had to reset the all of the memories.  The problem with this is
that it will no longer recieve out of band on the UHF side.  I have had
the hardware modified but never bothered to write down the sequence to
get the out of band reception back.  Can you help?  Please E-mail back to
one of the addresses below.  Thank You!

Brian Felt/ KB7RSP
<[e-mail]>
<[e-mail]>
<http://168.99.8.3/resumes/felt/home_page.html>



--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!john.minger
From: [e-mail] (JOHN MINGER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: A question about the
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JOHN MINGER)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 36


From: [e-mail] (John Minger)
Subject: Re: A question about the Radio Skack SWR/PWR meter for 2meters
Date: 9 Sep 1995 06:42:03 GMT
Message-ID: <42rcvr$[e-mail]>
In article <[e-mail]>,
BRETSKI  <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>I have a Radio Shack 144/430 SWR PWR meter.
>What is the bottom scale? I know it is the 15 watt range SWR scale
>but there is a % sign on the right side. What does this mean?
>
I also have a Radio Shack 144/430 SWR PWR meter, but there's no
"%" on it that I can find.  The meter is Cat no 19-320, BTW.
I wish somebody could make me understand the "SWR correction
curves on the back.  They are there to correct meter error at
certain low power levels, but I'm just too dense to use them.

(Duhhh  ;-)   73


--
___________________________________________________________________________
John A Minger    KE6DTC          Opinions expressed are those of the author
Los Angeles, CA                  and not those of anyone or anything else.

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: opinions on Standard
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 59


mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: opinions on Standard C508A?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 05:59:38 GMT
In article <424vft$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (User Services)
writes:
>I'm thinking about getting the C508A for its size and low power demand, but
>I'm worried about not having autopatch capabilities. Please give me your
>opinion of this radio. Universal Radio has them back ordered. Thanks.

I like mine, but then I don't have a patch on my repeater, and I do
have a cellphone. I'm surprised by how well this little radio works.
Battery life is great. Intermod is much less than I had expected,
though there is some. Audio quality is good, both transmit and
receive, though receive volume is limited and might be a problem
in very noisy areas. The manual sucks, I mean *really* sucks (and
is insulting to a ham with an IQ above plant life too), but you can
figure it out if you try. There is no schematic or board layout or
theory of operation section, major bummer.

It takes Icom/Yaesu/Radio Shack/MFJ speaker mikes (and packet cables),
and I suppose you might find a mike with a TT pad on it (kind of silly
really, to have a mike bigger than the radio). The supplied rubber dummy
load is pretty good in the ham bands, but sucks rocks outside the bands,
a major bummer considering the wideband capabilities of the rig as a
scanner substitute (but likely a major contributor to the good intermod
performance in band). Comet has introduced a gain antenna for the rig
that works much better out of band. Big though. The rig has a SMA antenna
connector which limits antenna choice, and I wouldn't recomend swapping
it back and forth to a mobile antenna since the little connector would
wear out quickly.

The low output power surprisingly isn't a problem. It gets in almost
anywhere my FT470 does, both used as handhelds and not as mobile rig
substitutes.

All in all, a good buy for what it is (I don't expect it to substitute
for a mobile rig, and it makes a great "remote mike" for a crossband
capable mobile rig). I'm keeping mine.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!wb3u
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (WB3U)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 69


on!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 95 07:43:40 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
   [e-mail] (Steve Sims) wrote:
>[e-mail] (WB3U) wrote:

>>When needs and laws are determined for "social" reasons rather
>>than the preservation of easily recognized individual rights, we
>>have ceased to be a free society.

>Hardly.   . . .  Considering the whole (ie social determination) is
>like excercising for cardiovascular fitness.  . . .

One of the problems with analogies is that their logic, while
persuasive, is often unrelated to the principles under discussion.
The above attempts to convince one of the merits of comparing sentient
individuals to body parts.  I've heard similar analogies relating us
to ant colonies and bee hives.  Buzz me up, Scotty.

>Freedom is defined in many ways.

Freedom is defined in only one way - the recognition, respect, and
protection of the rights of each individual.

>A self governing people generally express themselves through the
>vote.

There is no direct correlation between freedom and democracy.  One has
to ignore many inconsistencies and unfounded assertions to believe
otherwise.

>But a grave mistake is made when back roads created by wealth begin
>thwarting the political process.

Those back roads are the result of a political system already
corrupted and insufficiently restrained by an inadequate Constitution.
The more it's thwarted, the greater the chance for majority
recognition of this fact.  Have at it, guys.

>>The vendor owns the equipment and ** it is his property to do with
>>as he pleases. **

>By your same logic then it is morally sound to sell to unliscensed
>persons. (I added the stars in case you missed the point.)

I didn't say it was immoral to sell to unlicensed persons, although in
fact it doesn't meet the standards I would set for myself in that
position.  The only immorality I've seen mentioned is the suggestion
that dealers should be forced by law to sell to everyone.  This
concept is just as immoral as a law *prohibiting* them from selling to
everyone.  Comprende mi amigo?

73,

Jack  WB3U

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!wb3u
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (WB3U)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 42


on!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 95 07:58:18 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
   [e-mail] (Steve Sims) wrote:

>Every member is going a little too far, but what society has really
>forgotten was that there ARE NO public businesses for most social
>needs, only private ones.

What about public schools, public hospitals, public armed forces,
public police, public construction departments, etc. etc.  Last I
heard, the Gross National Product now consists of publicly-funded
services as a *majority*.

       <<snip>>

>I have often felt that in many ways America is at both extremes like
>kids at extreme opposite ends of a seesaw.  What is needed is for
>both to come closer to the middle.

There is no viable middle.  One extreme is unbridled government
control without regard for individual rights, the other is the
absolute protection of those rights.  Despite efforts to confuse these
issues, I know which is the preferable state.

73,

Jack  WB3U

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IBM-AT 286 computer "
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 65


From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: IBM-AT 286 computer "quiet" for HF?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 06:49:19 GMT
In article <42af2e$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mparkes)
writes:>I have an opportunity to buy an IBM -AT model 5170, 286 computer which
I>want to use on HF digital modes (amtor, pactor, Clover) using the HAL P38
>board. Does anyone have any knowledge if this was a QUIET computer? I
>don't want to buy something that's going to be generating a lot of noise
>on HF. Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
>73's Mike KS4DA

That's an old boat anchor machine. It's not particularly quiet,
but can be made so with sufficient shielding effort. In general,
modern motherboards are quieter than older ones because they
use multilayer construction with internal ground planes, and
because they use lower power parts. The case on that old machine
is pretty solid compared to some of the mostly plastic new ones,
however, and you can apply standard shielding techniques to
contain the noise inside the case.

Most of the noise that will bother you on HF, however, typically
comes from the monitor. The latest "green" monitors are usually
quieter than older monitors. And color monitors are somewhat
easier to shield than monochrome monitors.

It's difficult to make recomendations by model on which computers
are quiet and which aren't. There's too much variation in the
details of assembly that matter most. Two computers by the same
manufacturer, built on the same day, can have widely different
noise output. A lot depends on the "bite" of the screws holding
the case together. Good shielding practice requires a solid
electrical connection along all seams. For painted cabinets with
few screws, that's really iffy. If you sand the paint off of
mating surfaces, and use a screw every two inches along the
seams, most any computer can be made quiet. Of course external
cables can radiate like mad. You need to use shielded cables,
with connectors with shielded hoods, and a ferrite bead or
two won't hurt either.

One thing that likely *won't* help is "grounding" the computer.
That just supplies another conductive path along which the
noise can radiate, and can create ground loops that make the
noise worse, though sometimes you can "short out" an existing
ground loop by using a direct ground connection. (There's nothing
magic about ground that sucks noise away.)

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false ad
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 42


mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
2aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 07:06:19 GMT
In article <42bbnd$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (jdb )
writes:
>I don't know which court that person won in, but I assure
>you have no legal rights (except for equal housing laws) that can force
>anyone to sell anything to you if they do not want to....

The UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) is adopted by most States. It
requires that if you open your doors to the public, you can't
discriminate in who you sell to, with certain exceptions, IE
you can't sell firearms or booze to minors for example because
they aren't legally eligble to buy them. There's no such legal
restriction against sales of radio equipment to unlicensed
individuals. Restricting sales to amateurs only is equivalent
to limiting service in a resturant to whites only. Posting a
sign doesn't make it legal. Of course the outcome of individual
cases depends on the competence of the lawyers and judges
involved, and the depth of the pockets of the litigants.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!gary.coffman
From: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeat
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARY COFFMAN)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 39


mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 07:14:27 GMT
In article <[e-mail]>
[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:
>
>In article <[e-mail]>,
>   [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
>>Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?
>
>The FCC doesn't allow it.

Yes they did, it was called Class A CB, and operated at UHF.
That's now called GMRS and is no longer called CB, but repeaters
are still allowed. Repeaters aren't, and never have been, allowed
for Class D CB. Classes B and C CB were for remote control, and
have been largely subsumed under other Parts now, but at least
at one time Class D wasn't the only CB service.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:08:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!hobbs!joe.reaves
From: [e-mail] (JOE REAVES)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: H.R.E. BUYS HAM GEAR
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:01:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-3126
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JOE REAVES)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 29


y
From: [e-mail] (Joe Reaves)
Subject: H.R.E. BUYS HAM GEAR
Date: 9 Sep 95 03:43:49 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
HAM RADIO EQUIPMENT / H.R.E.
14355 S.W. BULL MTN. RD.
TIGARD, OREGON 97224
1 [phone]

       H.R.E. IS A USED HAM RADIO STORE , WE ALWAYS NEED CLEAN RADIOS
              AND EQUIPMENT...WE PAY TOP DOLLAR FOR NICE GEAR...
     SOLID STATE HF RIGS WANTED !!!  2 MTR. MOBILES, DUAL BANDERS AND
     OTHER HAM SHACK GEAR WANTED... WATT METERS, TUNERS AND GOODIES...
         IF YOU HAVE GEAR TO SELL PLEASE CALL US ... TOLL FREE...



--- QScan/PCB v1.15b / 01-0228
 * Origin: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__B_B_S_ Moonachie NJ (1:2604/122)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          The Roy Hobbs BBS (201)-641-7307 Moonachie NJ.USENET
          Internet:Fidonet:N2UTO'S BBS List:Telnet198.6.114.80
 [e-mail]                  //                   Running PCBoard 15.22
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:00 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: GPS Receiver
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 01:24:05 GMT
Lines: 25

In article <[e-mail]> Scott Remington <[e-mail]> writes:
>I am considering purchasing a GPS receiver in the immediate future and would
>like comments on the various models currently on the market.  Personal
>experience and/or rumors greatly appreciated.  I've been looking at the Sony
>IPS760 because of the immediate bells&whistles reaction.

The Garmin 45 is the value leader. It's a slick and tiny little box
that works very well, is gentle on batteries, and floats. Magellan
and Trimble offering are also good units. You don't want that Sony pig.
Every one I've tried had trouble acquiring and keeping the satellites,
much worse than even my antique Icom GPS which is also a battery gobbling
pig that demands an external amplified antenna to work in a car. You can
just throw the little Garmin up on the dash and it's a happy camper, I've
even seen it work while lying in the passenger seat.

Discount Marine, or one of the other marine chains, have the best
prices, and often have sales with even better prices. Last I looked
the Garmin 45 was $199, but I've seen it on sale for even less.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 02:55:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 78

WB>One of the problems with analogies is that their logic, while
WB>persuasive, is often unrelated to the principles under discussion.
WB>The above attempts to convince one of the merits of comparing sentient
WB>individuals to body parts.  I've heard similar analogies relating us
WB>to ant colonies and bee hives.  Buzz me up, Scotty.

The anology WAS related.  You can screw up by not taking a look at the
whole picture now and then.

WB>>Freedom is defined in many ways.
WB>Freedom is defined in only one way - the recognition, respect, and
WB>protection of the rights of each individual.

Your knowledge and thoughts seem to come from only one place.  All I can
say here is that freedom IS defined in many ways, you are wrong.
(Unless you restrict your world to only those individuals who line up on
fringe right.)

WB>A self governing people generally express themselves through the
WB>vote.
WB>There is no direct correlation between freedom and democracy.  One
WB>has to ignore many inconsistencies and unfounded assertions to
WB>believe otherwise.

Well, I agree (whew, finally).  I agree with that.  Yep.  There are many
people who consider themselves free, who most of us living here don't
consider free at all.  What right do we have to excessive pride ?

WB>>But a grave mistake is made when back roads created by wealth begin
WB>>thwarting the political process.
WB>Those back roads are the result of a political system already
WB>corrupted and insufficiently restrained by an inadequate
WB>constitution. The more it's thwarted, the greater the chance for
WB>majority recognition of this fact.

Yep, I agree with that too.  The only thing that is lacking so far as
majority recognition goes is more forums such as this one to air out our
differences.  This is great, isn't it ?  Without good forum, ideas do
not pass from person to person much.  We are taught all the time not to
talk about politics, because it only ends up in hurt feelings.  I guess
that might be good advice until we are able to talk without too much of
a flareup.  (At least ones that incites riots and other unwarrented
violent acts.)  Until then, we all have a greater tendency to line up
and accept whatever we are handed (especially if it is the hand that is
feeding us.)

WB>>>The vendor owns the equipment and ** it is his property to do with
WB>>>as he pleases. **

WB>>By your same logic then it is morally sound to sell to unliscensed
WB>>persons. (I added the stars in case you missed the point.)

WB>I didn't say it was immoral to sell to unlicensed persons, although in
WB>fact it doesn't meet the standards I would set for myself in that
WB>position.  The only immorality I've seen mentioned is the suggestion
WB>that dealers should be forced by law to sell to everyone.  This
WB>concept is just as immoral as a law *prohibiting* them from selling to
WB>everyone.

Yeap, I certainly agree with that !  Hmm...  upon rereading earlier
phrases up the chain in this discussion I am suprised that you are
choosing to express in just this way.  It sure seemed to me that you
felt differently a few messages ago.  However, the misunderstanding was
probably all in my mind I guess.

73 to you too, Jack.

Steve

---
. OLX 2.1 TD . MSI - Bringing it all together in '92
---
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 03:01:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 35

WB>What about public schools, public hospitals, public armed forces,
WB>public police, public construction departments, etc. etc.  Last I
WB>heard, the Gross National Product now consists of publicly-funded
WB>services as a *majority*.

There are so many catagories of needs that you have not even scratched
the surface.  They couldn't come close to addressing the need.  In many
catagories, there is NO public answer what so ever.

WB>       <<snip>>

I don't understand what "snip" means.

WB>>I have often felt that in many ways America is at both extremes like
WB>>kids at extreme opposite ends of a seesaw.  What is needed is for
WB>>both to come closer to the middle.
WB>There is no viable middle.  One extreme is unbridled government
WB>control without regard for individual rights, the other is the
WB>absolute protection of those rights.  Despite efforts to confuse
WB>these issues, I know which is the preferable state.

Ridiculous, of course there is.  There might not be an "acceptable"
middle for you though.

73,

Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here.
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 03:05:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42seug$[e-mail]>
Lines: 25

WT>We all have opinions, and they are all worth what we charge for them.
WT>Allow me to contribute another priceless (or is it valueless) personal
WT>non-expert opinion to this big pile of opinions.

WT>If the dealer refuses to sell something because he thinks it will be used
WT>illegally, more power to him. I seriously doubt that any Judge or jury
WT>could find him at fault for attempting to avoid providing equipment used
WT>to commit a crime. In my opinion, if the dealer knows or suspects the
WT>radio stuff is going to used illegally and he sells it...then in my eyes
WT>he's a piece of dog s...(oops) scum.

I just wanted to say, that this is another opinion that I agree with,
though I detect perception to the contrary.  Probably this is because I
saw points that others were making that some couldn't.

73,
Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . --T-A+G-L-I+N-E--+M-E-A+S-U-R+I-N-G+--G-A+U-G-E--
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 03:06:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42sjo0$[e-mail]>
Lines: 23

PT>>But then who knows in this crazy world? It ain't over til the fat lady
PT>>sues (used to be "sings").
PT>Good Lord, that's a great one.  Tom, do I have your permission to use
PT>that in casual conversation?  I almost wet my pants laughing so hard
PT>when I read it.

PT> That's why I'm
PT>>voting the Ted Kennedy-Don King ticket. Preferential treatment must be
PT>>stopped. We need to improved moral fiber in our leaders.
PT>>
PT>Huh?  That one totally escapes me.  Is that so toungue in cheek that it
PT>flew over my head?

Me too Pat, but I thought it best that I not comment on that until I saw
your message.
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . If this were an actual tagline, it would be funny.
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 03:15:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42qvt9$[e-mail]>
Lines: 26

PT>Good point.  It's a simple concept, but one that escapes many.  The whole
PT>concept of personal responsibilty is totally foreign to so many people in
PT>the 90's.  The whole firearms debate a good example.  This is neither the
PT>time or the place to discuss firearms, and I will not, but it serves as a
PT>good example.  Too many people see a little, insignificant non-problem,
.
.
.
etc..  Didn't want to use space requoting, but I agree with what you
were saying about the "general rule" today regarding special interest
groups.  Way to many, for much to trivial things.  One thing that I did
want to add though was that watchfulness seems to be a price that must
be paid to keep things going "on track", so to speak.  Even expressing
an opinions to each other in this forum has a beneficial effect, I
believe.  (Though people tell me otherwise everyday.)

73,
Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Unable to locate Coffee -- Operator Halted!
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ingr.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GPS Receiver
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 03:25:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 29

SR>I am considering purchasing a GPS receiver in the immediate future and would
SR>like comments on the various models currently on the market.  Personal
SR>experience and/or rumors greatly appreciated.  I've been looking at the Sony
SR>IPS760 because of the immediate bells&whistles reaction.

Scott,
I own and use a Garmin 55 AVD GPS.  I like it a lot.  The AVD in the
model # means it is there aviation model and has emergency database
lookup functions and so forth.  I am a pilot and just about wouldn't fly
without it.  I have it battery backed up with a 10 hour reserve (10
hours with the backlight and serial port turned on) so that I can use
the backlight at night without running down the batteries.  The battery
is a quantum ham battery, btw.

It has lasted a few years now and still in new shape.  The current
models offer still more functionality, though, and the model 55 is much
lower in price than what I paid for it.  (From $1299 down to $699, I
think.)  I have used it on ocassion for hiking too.  I looked at the
Sony and Trimble and Megelland, and seems like one other.  What do you
want to use it for ?
Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . It's only a hobby ... only a hobby ... only a
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 04:09:49 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 16
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42u6gd$[e-mail]>
References: <42sjo0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42sjo0$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (PTracy)
writes:

>Huh?  That one totally escapes me.  Is that so toungue in cheek that it
>flew over my head?
>
>

With Ted on the ticket it is probably a very tounge in cheek reply.
Question is whose cheek? Perhaps Don Kings. Anyway that's all water under
the bridge now. (gosh I love doing this)

No more double meanings or hidden references to murderers or dog yellow
cowards that drown their dates in love. I promise.

Tom


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!winternet.com!ppp-66-76
From: [e-mail] (Christopher A Hartung)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Uniden 66 PCXl
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 04:20:14 GMT
Organization: TreeFrog Cards and Comics
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42tsfm$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-66-76.dialup.winternet.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

Hi, I'm a small time CB'er, with a hankering to make some modifications to my
CB, such as sideband, power mike, roger beep, any other little suggestions
anybodyy might have. If you can either respon here or e-mail me, I would
appreciate it. Thanks,

-Chris
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!winternet.com!ppp-66-76
From: [e-mail] (Christopher A Hartung)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Small transmitter and receiver combo
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 04:22:33 GMT
Organization: TreeFrog Cards and Comics
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42tsk0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-66-76.dialup.winternet.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

Hi, I'm into launching model rockets, and need to come up with a very small
transmitter, and a matching receiver, to be used in locating rockets. It
doesn't have to be very powerful, say a 2500 ft range. The library wasn't too
helpful, but if anybody has plans, I would greatly appreciate it, or if you
could recommend another resource for plans, Thanks,

-Chris


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!news.bu.edu!transfer.stratus.com!bigboote.WPI.EDU!wpi.WPI.EDU!gkd
From: [e-mail] (Gregory K Doerschler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tone squelch Alinco DJ580T
Date: 10 Sep 1995 06:29:58 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <42u0l6$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

In article <[e-mail]>,
 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>I have an Alinco 580T handheld...
>
>the tone squelch of the 580T delays about 2 seconds before it opens up,
>and I miss the first 2 seconds of the other guy's transmission...
>
>The other problem with the tone squelch is that it only works when I am
>monitoring that band (i.e. the 443 tone squelch is diabled when the radio's
>2 meter transmitter is enabled)...

The DJ-580 tone squelch decoder is quirky in several respects:

1)  When decoding a CTCSS tone, there is a 2 second delay from the time
    the received tone disappears until the decoder resets.   Thus, when
    the CTCSS transmission "drops", the DJ-580 will be in carrier squelch
    mode for two seconds before reverting to CTCSS squelch mode.  In some
    respects, this is not a bad thing.  When operating simplex, for instance,
    it lets the user hear any non-CTCSS equipped stations attempting to
    break into the conversation between transmissions.

2)  When there is a signal already present on the frequency without the
    proper CTCSS tone (such as a distant repeater) and a transmission with
    the proper tone appears on top of it, there will be a 2 second delay
    before the DJ-580 tone squelch opens up on the proper tone.  This is what
    Mel is referring to above, and it definitely is a bug.  Fortunately, the
    problem only occurs under the specific conditions described, but it is
    still annoying.

3)  The tone decoder only functions on the primary band, so the secondary
    band will always be in carrier squelch mode.  When swapping primary
    bands, however, the tone decoder applies the tone setting of the
    former primary band to the new primary band; and only updates the
    setting when a frequency or tone change is made, or the transmit
    button is pressed.

        Example:  You have 146.52 stored in VHF with a tone squelch setting
        of 100 Hz and 446.000 stored in UHF with a tone squelch setting of
        88.5 Hz.  While you are talking on UHF, the VHF side is in carrier
        squelch mode.  When you push the VHF button (changing the primary
        band to VHF), the VHF side goes into tone squelch mode but with the
        UHF tone frequency of 88.5 Hz; rather than 100.0 Hz.  It stays this
        way until you transmit or change receive frequency, at which point
        the tone frequency gets updated to 100.0 Hz.

My DJ-580 was one of the first units produced, so I don't know if any of
these problems were addressed in later revisions.

                                                   Greg
                                                   N1DEM


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!gater3.sematech.org!pulitzer.eng.sematech.org!capshawd
From: [e-mail] (David Capshaw)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
Date: 10 Sep 1995 10:00:52 GMT
Organization: SEMATECH, Austin, Texas
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <42ud0k$[e-mail]>
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: doubtfire.eng.sematech.org

I did a little research on the Scout/Argo frequency stability and
setablility:

1) The operator's manual indicates that measurements to 10 Hz are used
when compensating the LO (PTO+XTAL) frequency.

2) A frequency counter on the LO output (of an Argo) confirms that it
is able to control within a 10 Hz range (or so) and that frequencies
can be set each 10 Hz.

3) The bad news is that while the system is locked on a frequency it
compensates for small changes in the PTO caused by the tuning control;
it does not detect the operator input until a 100 Hz change (or so)
was made.

So the answer is Yes and No.  The rig locks well onto a give frequency,
but one can have a devil of a time changing this control point by only
a few Hertz.

Dave
n5jnd

--
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Uniden 66 PCXl
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 11:55:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42tsfm$[e-mail]>
Lines: 26

CAH>Hi, I'm a small time CB'er, with a hankering to make some modifications to
CAH>CB, such as sideband, power mike, roger beep, any other little suggestions
CAH>anybodyy might have. If you can either respon here or e-mail me, I would
CAH>appreciate it. Thanks,

CAH>-Chris
CAH>[e-mail]

Chris,
I can vouch for the fact that it is easy and fun to study and take the
test to get an amateur radio liscense.  Since you have the desire to do
the things you mention (which in some cases are complex and require a
bit of study themselves).  Getting the liscense is the easy part, and
just the start too.  Once you've got that, you get easier access to a
lot of very knowledgable people that don't seem to mind spending a
little time here and there helping to pass on that knowledge.  At this
point you'll probably find yourself with project after project.
Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Small transmitter and rec
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 10 Sep 95 12:01:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42tsk0$[e-mail]>
Lines: 26

CAH>Hi, I'm into launching model rockets, and need to come up with a very small
CAH>transmitter, and a matching receiver, to be used in locating rockets. It
CAH>doesn't have to be very powerful, say a 2500 ft range. The library wasn't t
CAH>helpful, but if anybody has plans, I would greatly appreciate it, or if you
CAH>could recommend another resource for plans, Thanks,

A friend of mine who was upgrading a remote control airplane to a higher
model sold me his old set at a great deal.  I looked it over and
noticed a lot of small lightweight radio controlled servo motors and
stuff.  And from the way he described it, there was a great variety of
equipment to choose from.  Not that I know, but I'd bet that 1) either
something exists for model rockets, or 2) something could be adapted
from R/C airplane flying.  Hmm.. Just a guess, if you can find a hobby
shop that sells remote control planes, you might stop by and ask about
model rockets.  He might have them or know a magizine on that topic that
would provide information, or etc.

Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Hello, I am part number ................
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lugb.latrobe.edu.au!harpo.riv.csu.edu.au!csu.edu.au!usenet
From: Mr Bruce Chung <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Comparison of small full feature HF rigs (Kenwood, Alinco, Yeasu?)
Date: 10 Sep 1995 12:14:30 GMT
Organization: Charles Sturt University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <42ukr6$[e-mail]>
References: <41r2f1$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anxrm9.mit.csu.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] wrote:
>I am interested in picking up a small full function HF rig. The original
>choice was the Kenwood TS-50 but now there is the Alinco DX-70 (?)
>and also a Yeasu model that I can't think of just now. Does anyone have
>any pros or cons on any of these rigs? Also, what are the street prices
>on these currently? Any comments apprieciated.
>
>Pete Borders - WB4TKA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day. Forget the rest and buy the best. I reckon the to be released
ICOM 706. is probably the best of the bunch. I myself have ordered one
and looking forward to it. Good luck!......Bruce VK2WWW.




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 13:15:31 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42sjo0$[e-mail]> <42u6gd$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:

>No more double meanings or hidden references to murderers or dog
>yellow cowards that drown their dates in love. I promise.

Don't hold back on my account.  :)

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:19 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!vtnt02.vantek.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] ()
Subject: Re: Mods for Uniden 66 PCXl
Message-ID: <9a7cb$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 13:31:50 GMT
Distribution: world
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Open Solutions
Lines: 44

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Steve Sims)  writes:
> CAH>Hi, I'm a small time CB'er, with a hankering to make some modifications to
> CAH>CB, such as sideband, power mike, roger beep, any other little suggestions
> CAH>anybodyy might have. If you can either respon here or e-mail me, I would
> CAH>appreciate it. Thanks,
>
> CAH>-Chris
> CAH>[e-mail]
>
> Chris,
> I can vouch for the fact that it is easy and fun to study and take the
> test to get an amateur radio liscense.  Since you have the desire to do
> the things you mention (which in some cases are complex and require a
> bit of study themselves).  Getting the liscense is the easy part, and
> just the start too.  Once you've got that, you get easier access to a
> lot of very knowledgable people that don't seem to mind spending a
> little time here and there helping to pass on that knowledge.  At this
> point you'll probably find yourself with project after project.
> Steve

Not to mention that what he wants to do in some cases is just plain illegal
for a CB'er to do....

"Course that never stopped 'em from anything else  ;)

> ---
> .. OLX 2.1 TD . Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
> .. KMail 3.0aa
>
> ----
> Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
> Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
> Lilburn, GA 30247-7440
>



--
================================================================================
Dale J. Chatham                                                   WA5WNI
please reply to: [e-mail]
================================================================================





From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!er7.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (the one)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 13:50:56 -0400
Organization: Rutgers University
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <42v8i0$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: er7.rutgers.edu

It's just my (un)educated opinion, but haven't we already taken up MUCH too
much bandwidth arguing and yelling over this issue?  Everyone has an
opinion on it and opinion is just what it is.  Since you can't argue
the value that a man's opinion holds for him, why try to do so?  Let it die
already!
                                        Jay



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (James Dickson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: wtb watt meter
Date: 10 Sep 1995 14:27:19 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 3
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42usk7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

i want to buy a good used swr&watt meter for 10 to 160 meter email
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!aggedor.rmit.EDU.AU!lucy.swin.edu.au!bud!917461
From: [e-mail] (Graham Michael Wolstenholme)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ever Been a CB repeater?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 14:30:33 GMT
Organization: Swinburne University of Technology
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42usq9$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bude.cc.swin.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

WB3U ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <[e-mail]>,
:    [e-mail] (charles copeland) wrote:
: >Have there ever been CB repeaters? If not, why not?

: The FCC doesn't allow it.

In Australia we have a second "CB" service with 40 channels between
476.400 and 477.400 MHz, FM naturally.
Channels 1 to 10 and 31 to 40 are ten matched pairs for repeater use.
We don't have 27MHz repeaters either, too much potential for problems at
27 MHz... Plus the government policy for many years was to displace 27MHz
activity to UHF, though they seem to have accepted that 27MHz won't go
away now any more than it would in the 1970's when it wasn't yet legal
and was an amateur allocation.

Graham W.
VK3 TGW


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Gary Judd)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 14:34:09 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 8
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42ut11$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <42seug$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap1.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

If a dealer is a piece of dog ---- as you say for selling to someone who
may be unlicensed, or may use a radio for an illegal purpose, should a
dealer refuse to sell to all the hams who order their equipment out of
state
to avoid paying sales tax in their home state?  It is tax evasion by law
in
virtually every state in the union today.  Should they police that too?



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!nwfocus1.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Gary P. Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-736 Comments Please
Date: 10 Sep 1995 15:42:15 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <42v10n$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42t79c$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm10-ip30.halcyon.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.1

In article <42t79c$[e-mail]>, william@cortex (William Biggs) says:
>
>Jon Burt ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: Ed,
>: I just bought a IC-736 about 6 weeks ago. It was a big step up from
>: my old Ft-101ee! I think its a great radio, and I enjoy it, but If
>: I were to do it over, I think I would buy the 738 instead. 6m is nice
>: to have, but not too much there... The main problem w/ the 736 is the
>: lack of portability due to the built in power supply... of course, that
>: is also a feature. Good Luck!
>: 73 de Jon
>: KC4UKK
>
>My only beef is the rudimentary PL tone board available. If you need to
>get into more than one 6m repeater , pray that they use the same PL tone.
>
>The tone board option is programmed by soldering jumpers !
>
>Not something you can exactly do on the fly !
>
>
>--
>William C. Biggs , MD
>KC5JIF                            Howdy from the High Plains of Texas
>1900 South Coulter Drive
>Amarillo, TX 79106

William,

You will be glad to know the IC-775DSP and the forth coming IC-706 use
front panel programming  for the tones.  You can always connect a ribbon
cable and dp switch up or get a outboard TE-64 from Communications
Speciliasts in Ornage, CA

Gary


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:24 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!world!news
From: [e-mail] (Jim Martin)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Mr Usenet Himself)
Nntp-Posting-Host: world.std.com
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Federation of Asteroids
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 15:50:28 GMT
Lines: 21

I am wondering how many involved in this thread are actually involved in the
retail sale of amateur radio equipment?  I thought so.  Why is everyone so
worried about non-licensed people purchasing amateur radio transmitters?

FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed individuals.

That is what I love about cyber-argument.  You can argue until pigs fly on the
net when at the same time, off the net, life still goes on.  Same with the cw
argument.

Regards Gentlemen,

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jim Martin, WK1V              | When I go, I want to go just like my  |
|Lowell, Massachusetts         | grandfather...in his sleep...not like |
|USAF (Ret)ained               | the screaming passengers in the back  |
|ex: KA5MWD/N1CLS/KB1LW/HL9ZF  | seat of the car he was driving.       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 My opinion (if given) is my own and does not intentionally reflect the
 policy of others in any way, shape, or form.



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Ray Johnston)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Info on RF 675 Antenna Coupler
Date: 10 Sep 1995 15:54:41 -0400
Organization: Digital Visions Corporation
Lines: 17
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <42vfq1$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hopi.gate.net

I just returned from the Melbourne (FL) Hamfest, and had a great
time.  It's my favorite of all the Florida hamfests.

I brought home a nice antenna coupler, but have no manual or info.
It's an RF 675 Antenna Coupler from RF Communications Inc.  Does
anyone have any info (or a manual) on this unit.  It seems to be
a roller inductor, split-stator type tuner.  The inductor and
capacitor each have a geared, 3 digit 'turns counter' indicator.
Looks like it should take 200 watts or so.  Any info would be
greatly appreciated.

73  Ray

--
--------

Ray Johnston ([e-mail]) Boca Raton FL USA


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-202 Questions
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:08:16 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 19
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42v2hg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Greetings,

I just bought my first 2-meter radio yesterday.  Got the HTX-202 for $199
at Rat Shack.  Signal reports have all been good and strong, with clear
modulation.  For $199, I figured I couldn't go wrong.

In the instruction manual, it says that the supplied 7.2V nicad pack
should only be charged with the charger that's included in the package.
It's rated at 12VDC, 1A.  Would it hurt the battery pack and/or unit to
charge from the 12VDC cigarette lighter cord?  How about an external
12VDC, 2A power pack that I have?

My main concern is charging from the car cord.  I want to make sure my
nicad pack is fully charged at all times, but I don't want to mess up
this nice little radio, either.

-Drew in Charlotte-
 KF4DDM



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (jdb )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:12:27 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <42v2pb$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bir-al1-05.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Sep 10  9:12:27 AM PDT 1995

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Martin)
writes:
>
>I am wondering how many involved in this thread are actually involved
>in the retail sale of amateur radio equipment?  I thought so.  Why is
>everyone so worried about non-licensed people purchasing amateur radio
>transmitters?

 Until my partner died. I was. For over 20 years. And it was
OUR store policy that got the ball rolling again.
Posted in large black letters right behind the sales counter..

" WE DO NOT SELL AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF TRANSMITTING
  TO ANYONE WHO DOES NOT HAVE AN AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE."
>
>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
individuals.

 As was your right to do so. If they cause you grief with
interference please don't bother the FCC.


 N4DDS





From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!info.uah.edu!hubcap.clemson.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!news
From: "Alan K. Adamson" <ne1h>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Moto Mitrek as  Ham repeater?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:13:49 GMT
Organization: Amateur Radio Gateway WA4MEI, Chamblee, GA
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <42v2rt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tornado.ne1h.radio.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; Linux 1.3.24 i486)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

All,

I need some help, I was wondering if a Moto Mitrek could be used as a Ham
repeater, I haven't heard of many, and so I was wondering.  I know there are
three different freq ranges and maybe more, (low cut, mid, and High-cut).  So
who can help me with this, one, just wondering? :)

Thanks a ton in advance,
Alan Adamson
NE1H
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!info.uah.edu!hubcap.clemson.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!news
From: "Alan K. Adamson" <ne1h>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Moto Mitrek as  Ham repeater?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:14:00 GMT
Organization: Amateur Radio Gateway WA4MEI, Chamblee, GA
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <42v2s8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tornado.ne1h.radio.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; Linux 1.3.24 i486)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

All,

I need some help, I was wondering if a Moto Mitrek could be used as a Ham
repeater, I haven't heard of many, and so I was wondering.  I know there are
three different freq ranges and maybe more, (low cut, mid, and High-cut).  So
who can help me with this, one, just wondering? :)

Thanks a ton in advance,
Alan Adamson
NE1H
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!seunet!mn3.swip.net!cindy!cindy.ct.se!swedx!tomas.wennstrom
From: [e-mail] (Tomas Wennstrom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Choose H-t
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:49:00 +0200
Sender: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader:  JCQWK
X-Mailer: uugate 0.40 (SunOS 4.1.3) (Fidonet Gateway)
X-Info: UUCP Dialup connection
Organization:  SweDX, Stockholm, Sweden [phone]
Lines: 31

Hi,
I'm in beginners trouble.
I can't figure out what kind of H-T my first is going to be.
After looking over my budget, the options are:

Of course you in the USA, will hav an A instaed of an E in the
model-"numbers".

T21E
T22E
W21E
W21ET
FT-11R

I'm most interested in T21E, becuse I think it will give me much for
the mony. Am I wrong? If so, why?

* But feedback on the others are more than welcome. *
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 I would like to operate mobile, bicycle mobile, when I'm out walking the
dog and when I'm at home.
  Will some of this radios fill the above stated purposes more than the
others. Why?


Tomas, SM7VLF

... SM7VLF, your quary berth on the air
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:31 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mv!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bryan King)
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: ka1fqt.mv.com
Sender: [e-mail] (System Administrator)
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 16:50:23 GMT
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]> <42t7ov$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.3
Lines: 12

I've had a Ten-Tec Scout for almost 2 years and have had drift only for
the first few minutes after it has been turned on.  The rig has firmware
that locks in the frequency.  The drift has been impreceptable and I've
not had a problem with it.  Every rig I've owned has drifted a little
bit.  I think for the money its an excellent quality rig!  However I am
thinking of selling it and upgrading to a factory reconditioned Paragon
only because I've outgrown the Scout and want the extra features of a
more expensive hf radio.

73's

Bryan - KA1FQT


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!er7.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (the one)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:56:49 -0400
Organization: Rutgers University
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <42vjeh$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: er7.rutgers.edu

[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:

>   [e-mail] (Jim Martin) wrote:

>>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
>>individuals.

>Do you sell equipment as a sideline, or is it a legitimate business?
>If it's a business, you should back up your convictions by posting
>its name here.

>73,

>Jack  WB3U


Why?  So that he can be black-listed by the amateur community?  I don't
think so!

Jay
N2OTK


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!er7.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (the one)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 16:59:03 -0400
Organization: Rutgers University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <42vjin$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <42v8i0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: er7.rutgers.edu

[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:

>   [e-mail] (the one) wrote:

>>Let it die already!

>That's pretty funny.  Someone telling Hams to shut up. :)


You're missing my point totally!  This type of argument is not
what this group is ment for.  THAT'S the point!

Jay
N2OTK


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!chrisss.demon.co.uk
From: [e-mail] (Chris Selwyn-Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info sought on TH21-E
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:17:43 GMT
Organization: Landscape Services
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chrisss.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: chrisss.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

I have just picked up a trio TH21-E handheld without any documentation


Does anyone  Know this rig and if so could they let me know its output
also if there is anyway to run it from a 12V supply and anything else
that may be useful.

I intend to change its nasty phono style aerial socket at the first
oppurtunity anything I should watch out for?

many thanks
Chris Selwyn-Smith   Landscape Services
       [e-mail]
    G1RQZ                Hampton Court



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (John Masterson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 4 Sale - Dual Band handheld
Date: 10 Sep 1995 17:38:22 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <42v7qe$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sac8-15.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Sep 10 10:38:22 AM PDT 1995

For Sale  ***  New-in-the-Box

        ICOM IC-W21AT  144/430 Handheld
        BP-157A     7.2V 900mAh Battery
        BP-132A     12V  600mAh Battery
        BP-132      12V  600mAh Battery
        HM-75       Speaker/Mic
        2 Softcases for battery configs above


        $400.00 or b/o

        Call 916-392-2704 and leave message.


        73's   KL7RT



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MFJ Hi-Q Loop okay?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 17:41:57 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 4
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <42vm35$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I am looking at either the AEA Isoloop or the MFJ HiQ Loop. Anyone with
experience with the MFJ version? It's less and some of its features seem
to be better.
73's Mike KS4DA


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 17:45:34 GMT
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <42seug$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom) wrote:

>It ain't over til the fat lady sues (used to be "sings").

That's pretty d*** funny!

>People need to quit whining so much about rights. If we receive any
>more protection for our rights we won't have any rights left.

The problem is, the government has failed to define what our basic
individual rights are.  Instead, it has allowed special interests to
confuse their wants, desires and needs with legitimate rights.
Satisfying the bogus "rights" of each whining "victim" now comes at
the expense of everyone else's freedoms.

>I'm voting the Ted Kennedy-Don King ticket. Preferential treatment
>must be stopped.

Yes, no more preferential treatment.  To each according to his needs!
From each according to his abilities!  Get with the program!

>We need to improved moral fiber in our leaders.

Let me know when you find one.  :)

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 17:49:02 GMT
Lines: 78
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Steve Sims) wrote:

>The anology WAS related.  You can screw up by not taking a look at
>the whole picture now and then.

It's one thing to look at it, another to use it as justification to
abrograte individual rights.  Society is only a concept.  It doesn't
think, feel, invent machines or create wealth.  Only you and I as
individuals can do that.  It follows that only individuals have
rights, and that dismissal of those rights cannot ever actually be
"good for society".

>WB>>Freedom is defined in many ways.
>WB>Freedom is defined in only one way - the recognition, respect, and
>WB>protection of the rights of each individual.

>Your knowledge and thoughts seem to come from only one place.

I spent more than ten years studying these issues because I could no
longer reconcile the doctrine of our government with the freedoms
it supposedly champions.  The conclusions I reached have become the
core of a strict moral philosophy.

>All I can say here is that freedom IS defined in many ways, you are
>wrong.  (Unless you restrict your world to only those individuals who
>line up on fringe right.)

I don't know about the fringe right, but other definitions of freedom
can only be accepted if you're willing to empower the government at
the expense of individual rights.  Given that individual rights are
logically a prerequisite to freedom, those other definitions are
logically false.

>WB>>A self governing people generally express themselves through the
>WB>>vote.
>WB> There is no direct correlation between freedom and
>WB>democracy.  One has to ignore many inconsistencies and unfounded
>WB>assertions to believe otherwise.

>Well, I agree (whew, finally).  I agree with that.  Yep.  There are
>many people who consider themselves free, who most of us living here
>don't consider free at all.  What right do we have to excessive
>pride?

Not much.  I got a good laugh a few years ago when some politician
applauded "the fall of socialism".  He obviously knew that socialism
isn't freedom, but in his ignorance he couldn't recognize either.  The
USSR just happened to have it spelled out within the name of their
country.  <g>

>We are taught all the time not to talk about politics, because it
>only ends up in hurt feelings.  I guess that might be good advice
>until we are able to talk without too much of a flareup.  (At least
>ones that incites riots and other unwarrented violent acts.)  Until
>then, we all have a greater tendency to line up and accept whatever
>we are handed (especially if it is the hand that is feeding us.)

The heck with hurt feelings.  Anyone who thinks we're no better than
ants in a colony is a danger to us all, particularly in a democracy.
As for accepting what we're handed, the same was true in the USSR
until economic devastation forced a change.  I only wonder what will
happen *here* when our reserve of commercial initiative and natural
resources are both finally depleted.

>Hmm...  upon rereading earlier phrases up the chain in this
>discussion I am suprised that you are choosing to express in just
>this way.  It sure seemed to me that you felt differently a few
>messages ago.  However, the misunderstanding was probably all in my
>mind I guess.

It's extremely difficult to convey the meaning of someone's position
in a few paragraphs.  Some folks don't even believe what they write,
they just like to stir the pot.  :)

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:39 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!newsfeed.ed.ac.uk!leeds.ac.uk!news
From: [e-mail] (Adam J. Trickett)
Subject: Portable Receiver wanted
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gen_pc035.leeds.ac.uk
Organization: University of Leeds
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:53:11 +0100 (BST)
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
Lines: 25

Hi,

Don't know if this is the right place to post this, but here goes.

I shall shortly be going to the US for a couple of years to work. At
the moment I have a FM/AM audio/hi-fi tuner which works fine for UK
radio stations. What I'm looking for is a portable multi-band receiver
so I can get UK radio stations in the US - particularly BBC world
service. I also need a portable radio for general use, so this may be
the ideal time to kill two birds with one stone.

I don't want to spend a lot, nor do I need a super-dooper mega kit, a
small reliable, portable receiver will do. My price range is up to
about UKP150 ($230).

Thanx in advance.


--------------------------------------------------------------
| Adam J Trickett              | Voice   [phone] |
| Genetics University of Leeds | Fax     [phone] |
| Leeds LS2 9JT United Kingdom | EMail   [e-mail] |
| W3 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/genetics/resear/butlin/adam.html |
--------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!news.dseg.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bill Sorsby)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: CE-20A and/or CE-10B
Date: 10 Sep 1995 18:34:19 GMT
Organization: TI
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <42vb3b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pppsb3.itg.ti.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

I am interested in obtaining the following Central Electronics items,
any condition, working or not:  CE-20A or CE-10B SSB exciters, 100V or
600L amplifiers and VFO.

Please E-Mail me stating condition of equipment, your price, whether
manuals are included and your location.

Thanks,
Bill


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 18:45:51 GMT
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Jim Martin) wrote:

>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
>individuals.

Do you sell equipment as a sideline, or is it a legitimate business?
If it's a business, you should back up your convictions by posting
its name here.

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 18:50:44 GMT
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <42v8i0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (the one) wrote:

>Let it die already!

That's pretty funny.  Someone telling Hams to shut up. :)


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Audio question
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 19:02:09 GMT
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42ghdf$[e-mail]> <42solo$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

[e-mail] (Jim Weir) wrote:

>Most preamps are designed with 10K and above input impedances.

Yes, in fact many are 25-50K, but that's not the problem.  The output
impedance of players, tuners etc. is usually 1K and less, sometimes
only a few hundred ohms.

The risk with the Y connector is that the signal from one will
get into the output stages of the other (even when it's off), causing
distortion.  The advice regarding the levels is true enough, but this
won't determine the point at which any distortion generated this way
is reasonable.

If the distortion is below the threshold this particular person can
detect, maybe it doesn't matter.  I just wouldn't recommend it as a
method of driving the preamp without this one additional caveat.

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Drake TR-3 refurbishment, worth it?
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 19:10:11 GMT
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <42mm36$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Jim Smith) wrote:

>In the humble opinion of the Net.Hams, is it worth trying to rework
>this rig for good performance on 15 and 10, or just leave it as a
nice rig for 80/40, with an occaisional trip to 20?

That's a tough question, Jim.  I've seen people spend twice the
commercial value to restore cars, radios, model trains, etc. etc.

If you consider the rig to be just an appliance, the answer is
probably no, depending on what it needs.  Things get old, things
break.  Replace the tubes today and the power transformer might burn
up tomorrow.

OTOH, if you enjoy the restoration process itself and appreciate the
fun of operating older rigs, maybe it's worth it.  If you elect this
route, be prepared for an ongoing outlay of cash and time due to
decreased reliability and higher maintenance costs.

73 & gud luck,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!eos.resi.insa-lyon.fr!cmaion
From: [e-mail] (Cedric MAION)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: URGENT HELP : transceiver for Packet and Sat. ?
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 19:18:12 GMT
Organization: INSA de Lyon
Lines: 19
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: i209.resi.insa-lyon.fr
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #1]

I am looking for a model of tranceiver that could allow me :

-  to use in a first time terrestrial packet network (AFSK)
-  to be a start point for a later satellite station

WHAT TYPE OF TRANSCEIVER DO YOU ADVISE ME ?

I am about to buy a second hand IC 245E, have you info about it ? (I only know
that it is an old all-mode 2m TX, with 10W power). Would it be a good choice ?

(As a student and new OM, I am looking for a not too expensive solution.)

PLEASE HELP !!!

TNX ...

--
Cedric MAION
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!newsserver.rdcs.Kodak.COM!kodaki.kodak.com!bmitchel
From: [e-mail] (Bradley Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
Date: 10 Sep 1995 20:18:01 GMT
Organization: Eastman Kodak Research Labs
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <42vh5p$[e-mail]>
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]> <42t7ov$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kodaki.kodak.com


To all who responded to this question. I appreciate your responses
for sure!  I called Ten Tec regarding this issue. It seems that
the frequency compensation minimum quantization is much less than
100 Hz, and that it works as follows:

CW -10Hz to +40 HZ window around the operating freq.
SSB 100 HZ window around the poperating freq (+- 50 HZ)
anything outside that window is compensated for, in much smaller
increments than 100 Hz.

Thus those of you out there that have these rigs, congrats,
I'll probably start looking for one now that I know the real
story, and have had good feedback.

If any of you out there are parting with your scouts, give me a
shout.  [phone] before 10 PM EDT.  or email [e-mail].
73 Brad
WB8YGG
.



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!warp.cris.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Mike Cook)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Moonbounce Audio and FFT Image Recordings
Date: 10 Sep 1995 21:11:07 GMT
Organization: Home
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <42vk9b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: crc3-fddi.cris.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86308 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16854 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13774

I have added some EME audio recordings (WAV files) of
typical moonbounce QSOs to my web page:

       http://www.webcom.com/~af9y

Also included are GIF images of what the signals looked
like with the FFTDSP program.

BTW:  Still no winner of the weak signal challenge.  The
      prize is $40.  All info is on the web page.

de Mike, AF9Y



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!news
From: [e-mail] (rod)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Eimac 8874 Tubes
Date: 10 Sep 1995 21:14:44 GMT
Organization: Frequency Spectrum
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <42vkg4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.147.154.74
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.4
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16836 rec.radio.shortwave:58343 rec.radio.swap:42928



        I have a pair of 8874 Eimac Grid Tubes. Brand New in Box.
                Sell the pair for $500.00 Shipping Included


New Jersey
Call: 201-797-1227
E-Mail: [e-mail]
                                                    Rod
                                                   N2RVM




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!news.intelenet.com!newshost.neptune.net!jds
From: [e-mail] (Jeffrey D. Stai)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Small transmitter and rec
Date: 10 Sep 1995 21:19:17 GMT
Organization: Neptune.Net (Neptune Consulting Group, Inc.)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <42vkol$[e-mail]>
References: <42tsk0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: neptune.neptune.net

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Steve Sims)  writes:

>CAH>Hi, I'm into launching model rockets, and need to come up with a very small
>CAH>transmitter, and a matching receiver, to be used in locating rockets. It
>CAH>doesn't have to be very powerful, say a 2500 ft range. The library wasn't t
>CAH>helpful, but if anybody has plans, I would greatly appreciate it, or if you
>CAH>could recommend another resource for plans, Thanks,

>from R/C airplane flying.  Hmm.. Just a guess, if you can find a hobby
>shop that sells remote control planes, you might stop by and ask about
>model rockets.  He might have them or know a magizine on that topic that
>would provide information, or etc.

Suggest posting your question in rec.models.rockets. Lots of model rocket fans
use transmitters to locate the rocket, and also use R/C stuff to control
parachute deployment, etc. There is even commercial stuff available!

jeff stai, ke6knf
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 21:28:25 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 29
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <4303bp$[e-mail]>
References: <42ut11$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42ut11$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Gary Judd) writes:

>If a dealer is a piece of dog ---- as you say for selling to someone who
>may be unlicensed, or may use a radio for an illegal purpose, should a
>dealer refuse to sell to all the hams who order their equipment out of
>state
>to avoid paying sales tax in their home state?  It is tax evasion by law
>in
>virtually every state in the union today.  Should they police that too?
>
>
Hi Gary,

They must have changed stuff since I was in the retail business. I never
"paid" sales tax, I just collected it and passed it on to the state. So
was never profit by avoiding sales tax unless I collected it and just kept
it. If someone is charging customers tax and not turning it in they should
go to jail!

OTOH you may mean the customer is breaking the law. It isn't illegal to
buy out of state for any reason you desire (so far as I know) as long as
it is a legal personal purchase and not part of a bootleg resale
underground operation.

Are you implying there is a law that says we must purchase everything in
the state where we live and mail order is illegal? Please explain.

73 Tom


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:50 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]> <42t7ov$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 21:30:37 GMT
Lines: 7

That ham was correct. Call Ten Tec and ask them. Maybe you could disable
that feature and let her drift.
--
  Steve
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.interserv.net!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TL922A
Date: 10 Sep 1995 22:16:58 GMT
Organization: InterServ News Service
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <42vo4q$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm2_10.digital.net
X-Newsreader: AIR News 3.X (SPRY, Inc.)

Is there a WARC modification for this amplifier?

Lance  K8IXZ
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 22:39:00 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 10
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42vpe4$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

"Useless as tits on a bull..."

(ROTFLMAO!!)

That's good, that's VERY good!


-Drew in Charlotte-
 KF4DDM



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 22:46:22 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <42vpru$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <42seug$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

>The problem is, the government has failed to define what our basic
>individual rights are.  Instead, it has allowed special interests to
>confuse their wants, desires and needs with legitimate rights.
>Satisfying the bogus "rights" of each whining "victim" now comes at
>the expense of everyone else's freedoms.

The ridiculous ECPA is a textbook example of this.


-Drew in Charlotte-
 KF4DDN



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!sanjuan.amtsgi.bc.ca!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TS830
Date: 10 Sep 1995 22:50:11 GMT
Organization: Island Net in Victoria, B.C. Canada
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <42vq33$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: saturna.islandnet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 16bit)

Where can I get a complete service guide for this radio? I have the
owners manual, but I'd hate to try to do any work on the 830 with just
this info.

Thanks

Jan Skirrow
VE7DJX



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ Hi-Q Loop okay?
Date: 10 Sep 1995 23:14:44 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 11
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <4309j4$[e-mail]>
References: <42vm35$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42vm35$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mparkes)
writes:

>I am looking at either the AEA Isoloop or the MFJ HiQ Loop. Anyone with
>experience with the MFJ version? It's less and some of its features seem
>to be better.
>73's Mike KS4DA

Mike, I have the MFJ here and it works pretty well. It is about an s unit
down from a full size antenna on 14 MHz, and nearly equal on 28 Mhz.
Tom


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:56 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!world!news
From: [e-mail] (Jim Martin)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Mr Usenet Himself)
Nntp-Posting-Host: world.std.com
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Federation of Asteroids
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 23:26:00 GMT
Lines: 48

[e-mail] (jdb ) sed:

:>" WE DO NOT SELL AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF TRANSMITTING
:>  TO ANYONE WHO DOES NOT HAVE AN AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE."

You probably had a water fountain with a sign over it that said, "WHITES ONLY"
too.

Twenty years ago you may have gotten by with your sign but I doubt today that
it would stay up long.

I previously sed:
:>>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
:>>individuals.

jdb replied:
:> As was your right to do so. If they cause you grief with
:>interference please don't bother the FCC.

Here's where you lost me jdb.  Why would I bother with the FCC in the first
place?  They would be the last ones that I, personally, would contact.  FWIW in
the last 15 years I have helped to squelch many an interfering station and
without help of the FCC.  Well, except for one time, in 1983, when I had to
call the Powder Springs, GA monitoring station for assistance with fishing
boats in the Gulf of Mexico.  Their modified 27 MHz transmitters were copied
very well on several 10 meter frequencies.  But that is really unrelated to
what we are discussing here.  I think Gary Coffman said it very well in his
most recent post.

I sincerely hope that your actions helped you to sleep better.  I mean after
all, you were doing your civic duty and keeping people from becoming criminals,
right?  I'm sure your actions helped to improve the sales figures of other
amateur radio dealerships.  ;{D

Hmmmm....Four-Land.  That says it in a nutshell.

Hey Burt!  You can jump in anytime now. :-D

Cheers!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jim Martin, WK1V              | When I go, I want to go just like my  |
|Lowell, Massachusetts         | grandfather...in his sleep...not like |
|USAF (Ret)ained               | the screaming passengers in the back  |
|ex: KA5MWD/N1CLS/KB1LW/HL9ZF  | seat of the car he was driving.       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 My opinion (if given) is my own and does not intentionally reflect the
 policy of others in any way, shape, or form.



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:57 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!world!news
From: [e-mail] (Jim Martin)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Mr Usenet Himself)
Nntp-Posting-Host: world.std.com
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Federation of Asteroids
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 23:26:16 GMT
Lines: 23

[e-mail] (WB3U) sed:

:>   [e-mail] (Jim Martin) wrote:

:>>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
:>>individuals.

:>Do you sell equipment as a sideline, or is it a legitimate business?
:>If it's a business, you should back up your convictions by posting
:>its name here.

It IS a legitimate business and I only work for them on a part-time basis.
Since I do not and will not speak on their behalf I see no reason to mention
their name here on the net.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jim Martin, WK1V              | When I go, I want to go just like my  |
|Lowell, Massachusetts         | grandfather...in his sleep...not like |
|USAF (Ret)ained               | the screaming passengers in the back  |
|ex: KA5MWD/N1CLS/KB1LW/HL9ZF  | seat of the car he was driving.       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 My opinion (if given) is my own and does not intentionally reflect the
 policy of others in any way, shape, or form.



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (jdb )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 10 Sep 1995 23:31:54 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <42vsha$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <42v8i0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42vjin$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bir-al1-18.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Sep 10  4:31:54 PM PDT 1995

In <42vjin$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (the one)
writes:
>
>[e-mail] (WB3U) writes:
>
>>   [e-mail] (the one) wrote:
>
>>>Let it die already!
>
>>That's pretty funny.  Someone telling Hams to shut up. :)
>
>
>You're missing my point totally!  This type of argument is not
>what this group is ment for.  THAT'S the point!
>
>Jay
>N2OTK


 Then don't get in the middle of it.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:09:59 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!gsm001!gsmlrn
From: [e-mail] (Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (was: False Advertising)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: gsm001.mendelson.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (NNTP Poster)
Organization: mendelson.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]> <42aqnj$[e-mail]> <42bbnd$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42god2$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 23:47:25 GMT
Lines: 29

Dan Brown ([e-mail]) wrote:



: 1.    People say the best way to learn CW is to listen off the air.
: Well, that means you need a radio.  Granted, receivers are available,
: but lots of people prefer the all-in-one convenience of a transceiver,
: which is why they're the most common type of rig.  Why not let this
: person buy a rig to help learn code?


When I first was licensed I looked for a modern, already build transmitter
that I could use with my sw receviers. I had a Kenwood R5000, and an NRD535D.
I was unable to find anything that would work. In fact, I could not find a
new transmitter at all.

So as far as I can tell, there is no choice, unless you want to buy a
receiver and sell it when you get your license, you MUST buy a
transcevier.


73,

Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson  (N3OWJ)
President, Mendelson Computer Consulting, Inc.
Voice [phone]  Fax [phone] Email: [e-mail]
**** Michael Rubin Mendelson, Born 7/8/95 6:15am 9# 1.8oz 21"


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.ais.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Greg Kaiser)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-2500M Mod?
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 23:59:20 -600
Organization: StarNet, Inc
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <430fuo$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp212.starnetinc.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NewsReader: QNews v0.9b4 Beta 15 Apr 1994 (Evaluation period expired -- 83 days).

I'm looking for the Mod for a Yaesu FT-2500M 2m Mobile..I need
the mod to enable out of band xmit for ESDA.

If anyone can be of help, send the mods to [e-mail]

Any help is greatly appricated,
Thanks!
Greg


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!usenet
From: "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need Advice: Best PC for HF digital?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 01:13:08 GMT
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <4302f4$[e-mail]>
References: <42hjq4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

    The Best PC would be one that meets FCC Class B Type Acceptance
requirements. This would include the Monitor and printer as well. Try to
find a low radiation monitor within the budget restraints.
    It will also help to have the computing equipment on a different
120vac circuit if possible. Using RFI/EMI surge protected and filtered
duplex or multiple outlet boxes is benefitial. More important is the
removal of the TX/RX antenna from the immediate area of computer. Stay
away from long wires with tuner located in the shack. Balanced feed
antennas are less susceptable to local computer RFI.

73 Bob,

KG7D



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.cybercom.com!usenet
From: Stephan Rashkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Help - Ham-stores in Philadelphia ??
Date: 11 Sep 1995 01:15:41 GMT
Organization: CyberComm Online Services
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <4302jt$[e-mail]>
References: <42mdtt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: raven.cybercomm.net
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16873 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86375

[e-mail] (Knut Terje Ulvund) wrote:
>
> CQ CQ , calling hams in or nearby Philadelphia, PA.
>
> My name is Terje, Call-sign LA8RIA.
> I am going to visit Philadelphia between Fri 15. sep. 95
> and Sat. 23. sep. 95.
> During this week I am interested in visiting one or more
> ham-stores to pick up an all mode 2m or 2m/70cm transceiver.
>
> Are there anyone out there who can help me out locating ham-stores
> in or nearby the City.
>
> I will attend the International Oracle User Week at the
> Pennsylvania Convention Center.
>
> Answers are preferrably recieved by mail to :
> [e-mail]
>
> Many thanks in advance !!
>
> 73's de Terje
> --
> +-----------------------------------------------+
> !  Knut Terje Ulvund                            !
> !  Headquarters - Defense Command Norway        !
> !  Email      : [e-mail]                !
> !  Tel. job   : ([phone]               !
> !  Tel. priv  : ([phone]               !
> !  Packet-BBS : LA8RIA@LA4O                     !
> !                                               !
> ! 'f U cnt rd ths, U'r nt a prgrmr !            !
> +-----------------------------------------------+

There's one called Hamtronics just outside of Phila.,in a town
called Trevose..maybe 15 to 20 minutes from Phila. They carry
all major brands of ham goodies..
Steve, WA2NHZ



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ddi2.digital.net!usenet
From: Lance Lyman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TL922A HF amplifier modification
Date: 11 Sep 1995 01:22:07 GMT
Organization: FLORIDA ONLINE, Florida's Premier Internet Provider
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <4302vv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: @pm4_14.digital.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 16bit)

Is there a mod to add WARC bands to the TL922A?


K8IXZ   [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!cello.gina.calstate.edu!swrl71.gina.slip.csu.net!rhought
From: Robert D Houghton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu Ft-8500 Mods
Date: 11 Sep 1995 01:52:34 GMT
Organization: Physics teacher/Science Chairman
Lines: 24
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4304p2$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.150.1.71
X-UserAgent: 1.1
X-XXMessage-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-XXDate: Sun, 10 Sep 95 01:57:35 GMT

Hi there,

Does anybody have a copy of the CAP/MARS mods for the new Yeasu FT-8500
dual band mobile radio. If so I'd appreciate the info, either here or by
email.

So far I love this radio despite it's rather clunky
microphone/controller. Receiving range is wide on both bands, scanning
speed is *fast* and intermod rejection seems good.

Even if you *don't* have the mods, I'd like to communicate with others
who have this radio.

Thanks,

Bob
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|
|                              |  AMSAT member #26148                    |
| Robert D. Houghton           |  digital satellites: KC6LVG@PACSAT      |
| Science Department Chairman  |  Packet radio: kc6lvg@k6unq.#cas.na     |
| John A. Rowland High School  |  Other internet:                        |
| Rowland Heights, CA 91748    |    [e-mail]                     |
|                              |    [e-mail]    |
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!newsmaster
From: Ed Buchanan <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Cubical Quad Antennas
Date: 11 Sep 1995 02:13:33 GMT
Organization: Cubex Co.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <43060d$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ad26-172.compuserve.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Complete line of Quad Antennas available from CUBEX CO. 2761 Saturn St. Brea, CA USA 714-577-9009
Fax [phone]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.genesis.net!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS Swan 700-CX HF Transceiver
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 02:14:36 GMT
Organization: Genesis Net Corp
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <42vven$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: scotty.genesis.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82


For sale, Swan 700-CX HF transceiver, in excellent condition
cosmetically on the inside and outside.  Includes manual, matching
power supply and speaker.  This is a good old high power vacuum tube
transceiver for 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 meter ranges.  400 watts PEP.
I purchased the set two years ago at a sale and have used it quite a
bit for receiving only, performance is great for receiving but unknown
for transmitting.

Asking $175 or any reasonable offer, E-mail me at:

[e-mail]





From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (John B. Lawrence )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 11 Sep 1995 08:20:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <430rgt$[e-mail]>
References: <42ut11$[e-mail]> <4303bp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bak-ca1-05.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Sep 11  1:20:45 AM PDT 1995

In <4303bp$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
writes:
>
>In article <42ut11$[e-mail]>,
[e-mail]
>(Gary Judd) writes:
>
>>If a dealer is a piece of dog ---- as you say for selling to someone
>>who may be unlicensed, or may use a radio for an illegal purpose,
>>should a dealer refuse to sell to all the hams who order their
>>equipment out of state to avoid paying sales tax in their home state?
>>It is tax evasion by law in virtually every state in the union today.
>> Should they police that too?
>>
>>
>Hi Gary,
>
>They must have changed stuff since I was in the retail business. I
>never "paid" sales tax, I just collected it and passed it on to the
>state. So was never profit by avoiding sales tax unless I collected it
>and just kept it. If someone is charging customers tax and not turning
>it in they should go to jail!
>
>OTOH you may mean the customer is breaking the law. It isn't illegal
>to buy out of state for any reason you desire (so far as I know) as
>long as it is a legal personal purchase and not part of a bootleg
>resale underground operation.
>
>Are you implying there is a law that says we must purchase everything
>in the state where we live and mail order is illegal? Please explain.
>
>73 Tom

In Kalifornia, if you purchase something via mail order from another
state and the retailer does not charge you Kalifornia sales tax, you
are supposed to send the state of Kalifornia a check (or money order,
precious metals, your first born child, other legal tender) for the
amount of the sales tax it WOULD have been had you purchased it in
Kalifornia (Long damn sentence, isn't it?). I am not aware of anyone
that actually does it though. . . .I do of course. I, of all people,
would NEVER break/bend/fold/spindle/mutilate any law of the state of
Kalifornia whether that law was just or unjust.

The Kalifornia State Board of Equalization actually has the b..ls to
ask mail-order retailers (who have no offices/stores in Kalifornia)in
other states to collect the sales tax for them. The retailer, however,
is not obligated, legally (yet anyway) or otherwise, to comply. I
understand most other states have the same type of law as Kalifornia.

So there. . .

73

John
KE6TGN


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Cubical Quad Antennas
Date: 11 Sep 1995 08:59:35 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 11
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <431brn$[e-mail]>
References: <43060d$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43060d$[e-mail]>, Ed Buchanan
<[e-mail]> writes:

>Complete line of Quad Antennas available from CUBEX CO. 2761 Saturn St.
Brea,
>CA USA 714-577-9009
>Fax [phone]
>
>

Advertising on newsgroups sucks.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!edisto.awod.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Steve Thomason)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help Needed re: TS820S Display
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <431hbb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp120.awod.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.38

Has anyone had any trouble with a Kenwood TS820S digital diplay?  Mine
is a little flaky at times, and reads 2KC high on 40 meters, and a
couple of MC off on 20, 15, and 10.

Any suggestions, other than deep-sixing?



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 386/16mhz work to program FT51r?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 10:53:36 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 6
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <431ihg$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I have an older 386/16 mhz w/ 4 meg ram and 40 HD. Running DOS 5.0 and
Windows 3.1. Anyone know if this will work okay using the ADMS software to
program the FT51r HT?
Thanks,
Mike KS4DA



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!pipeline!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!main03!landisj
From: [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Info sought on TH21-E
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 11 Sep 95 11:19:03 EST
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: world
Organization: North American Drager - Telford, PA
Lines: 34

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Chris Selwyn-Smith) writes:
> I have just picked up a trio TH21-E handheld without any documentation
>
>
> Does anyone  Know this rig and if so could they let me know its output
> also if there is anyway to run it from a 12V supply and anything else
> that may be useful.

This sounds like the Euro version (tone-burst) of the Trio/Kenwood TH21A.
12V lighter adapters were available. Also the quick charger included a 12V
adapter. They both have a "dummy battery pack" that slides onto the radio
that delivers 7.2V to rig. Output power is 2W/Hi, .2W/Lo. A no-frills
handheld with a nice tight front end.

>
> I intend to change its nasty phono style aerial socket at the first
> oppurtunity anything I should watch out for?

Why don't you just pick up a male-phono to BNC adapter? It will fit snugly
and work fine. Sure beats digging around in a radio that you may not be able
to get replacement parts for. Kenwood sold a screw on BNC adapter for this
(I have one), but I don't think it's still available. Call 'em and ask.

>
> many thanks
> Chris Selwyn-Smith   Landscape Services
>        [e-mail]
>     G1RQZ                Hampton Court
>

Joe - AA3GN
--
Joe Landis - Systems and Network Manager - North American Drager - Telford, PA
[e-mail]                        ..speaking only for myself, of course..


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (J.Fitter BV/N0IAT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: H.R.E. BUYS HAM GEAR
Date: 11 Sep 1995 12:24:42 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Asia, Semiconductor Finance
Lines: 26
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4319qa$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.167.36.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

Hi Joe, Dont mean to sound like a jerk, but this
newsgroup is not intended for buying and selling gear.
Please dont cross-post to this newsgroup, when putting
up the buy/sell/swap adds. As the name implies, the
discussion on this newsgroup center around equipment
itself and not about the buying/selling for business.
Most of the readers on this newsgroup  also read
rec.radio.swap, which is the appropriate newsgroup for
buying and selling amateur and commercial radio gear.

Also, please no caps.  It infers "shouting", which
would tend to scare the customers off.

Congratulations on vending used ham gear...not many
outlets deal in used gear these days.

Seriously...not meant to be a flame.  Just some
friendly information.

--
73 from Joe Fitter  BV2/N0IAT  Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.

Ex. 7J1AOF(Japan) KA0ZDH(novice) YU3/N0IAT(Slovenia)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986 //comments are mine
only



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (J.Fitter BV/N0IAT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ Hi-Q Loop okay?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 12:30:11 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Asia, Semiconductor Finance
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <431a4j$[e-mail]>
References: <42vm35$[e-mail]> <4309j4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.167.36.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

In article <4309j4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>In article <42vm35$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mparkes)
>writes:
>
>>I am looking at either the AEA Isoloop or the MFJ HiQ Loop. Anyone with
>>experience with the MFJ version? It's less and some of its features seem
>>to be better.
>>73's Mike KS4DA
>
>Mike, I have the MFJ here and it works pretty well. It is about an s unit
>down from a full size antenna on 14 MHz, and nearly equal on 28 Mhz.
>Tom


Occasionally use one here from BV at the club station.  The antenna is mounted
horizontally at about 120 feet in the clear (away from any nearby metal).  While
tuning is very touchy (hard to tune), the performance is quite decent. We ran the All
Asia CW contest with it and it it OUTPERFORMED the 1/2 wave vertical (R5) on 20 and
17, was equal on 15, 12, and 10.  It is only about 1 s-unit below a 2-element
tri-band trap yagi (Mosley TA-32).   This one was brought back from Canada by a local
ham..
BTW....I'm still trying to get my hands on one but no luck so far.  I'd say give it a
whirl if you can find one.

--
73 from Joe Fitter BV2/N0IAT  Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.
Ex. 7J1AOF(Japan) KA0ZDH(novice) YU3/N0IAT(Slovenia)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986 //comments are mine only



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (LelandH105)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: repeater controller search for info
Date: 11 Sep 1995 15:19:00 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 20
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <432234$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (LelandH105)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Hello -

My club's repeater was recently hit by lightning, sending the ACC
controller to ham radio heaven. We're going to replace it with a new one,
I'm gathering info.

We're going to be looking for a top of the line/state of the art
controller
for, one that would hopefully include speeddial autopatch, recorded voice
for ID and tail messages, etc.

Any recommendations from your experience would be a great help to us in
our research. It will help us in determining which ones are reliable and
easy to use and are most flexible.

Thanks in advance for any info you can help me with. Please respond to:
[e-mail]

73
Leland, WB0MLL


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:15 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rodell
From: [e-mail] (R.W. Odell)
Subject: Wanted: Schematic for ACC DVR
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:41:35 GMT
Lines: 12
Sender: [e-mail]

I need a schematic for an Advanced Computer Controls DVR-1.  Inquiries to
ACC about this particular item have gone unanswered, and I need to track
down a problem.  My manual does not contain the full schematic.

Any help or pointers is/are appreciated.  Thanks in adcance.


--
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
  _/_/ Robert W. Odell (WA2WLH)    Voice: [phone]      _/_/
 _/_/  Salt Lake City, Utah,U.S.A. CP-ASEL, AMEL             _/_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:17 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Small transmitter and receiver combo
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <42tsk0$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:55:21 GMT
Lines: 48

In article <42tsk0$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Christopher A Hartung) writes:
>Hi, I'm into launching model rockets, and need to come up with a very small
>transmitter, and a matching receiver, to be used in locating rockets. It
>doesn't have to be very powerful, say a 2500 ft range. The library wasn't too
>helpful, but if anybody has plans, I would greatly appreciate it, or if you
>could recommend another resource for plans, Thanks,

In a very old Popular Electronics magazine article (late 60s) there
was a project to build a 100 mW FM transmitter for rocket telemetry.
A kit was available. It transmitted under Part 15 in the FM broadcast
band. Range was plenty for Estes rocket kits. I built one, it worked.

So, it would seem that any little FM wireless broadcaster circuit
should work. The trick is in packaging it to fit the rocket tube.
A one chip transmitter, like the Motorola MC2833 used in cordless
phones, would seem ideal. Motorola has an Application Note on
building little FM transmitters with this chip. Ramsey also has a
little FM broadcaster kit, though the circuit board is shaped
wrong to fit in a rocket. Or you might try gutting a Mr. Microphone.
I suspect that circuit board would be just a fit.

I used several different sensors with my little transmitter.
I used a thermistor for temperature measurements, and a
phototransistor looking out one side of the rocket to give
me a spin count. Either could be hooked to the "mike" input
to vary the frequency of the transmitter according to the
conditions they were sensing. An ordinary FM radio was
used to receive the signal.

For use in RDFing a downed rocket, all you need is the carrier
signal, a handheld FM broadcast radio with an external antenna
input, and a directional antenna. A double ducky direction finder
would be nicer and they're simple to build, or kits are available
for about $25. (That uses two short antennas on a stick with a
switching circuit that switches one then the other antenna to
the receiver at an audio rate. You just turn the stick until
the audio note nulls in your receiver and the rocket will be
in the direction perpendicular to the stick.) Amateurs use
all sorts of RDF gear for "foxhunting". There's a regular
column in 73 Magazine, and there's a book out too. You might
check those out for ideas.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:18 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <42ut11$[e-mail]> <4303bp$[e-mail]> <430rgt$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 16:19:15 GMT
Lines: 29

In article <430rgt$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (John B. Lawrence ) writes:
>
>The Kalifornia State Board of Equalization actually has the b..ls to
>ask mail-order retailers (who have no offices/stores in Kalifornia)in
>other states to collect the sales tax for them. The retailer, however,
>is not obligated, legally (yet anyway) or otherwise, to comply. I
>understand most other states have the same type of law as Kalifornia.

A bill is annually introduced in Congress to *force* mail order companies
to collect the appropriate sales tax for the State of the purchaser. So
far it hasn't passed, but its only a matter of time. A bill has passed
that says if a company does business in a State, it has to collect sales
tax for sales to people of that State, even if the sale is mail ordered
from another of the company's storefronts in another State. (HRO, AES,
etc fall under this law for States in which they have a point of presence.)

There's a big fight about this annually. States with mailorder
companies want them to pay sales tax to the State where the seller
resides while other States want the money to go to the State where
the purchaser lives. One or the other will win some day, and the
era of dodging sales tax will be over for those who routinely punch
the 800 numbers.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 11 Sep 1995 16:25:19 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <431ntf$[e-mail]>
References: <42ut11$[e-mail]> <4303bp$[e-mail]> <430rgt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

>The Kalifornia State Board of Equalization actually has the b..ls to
>ask mail-order retailers (who have no offices/stores in Kalifornia)in
>other states to collect the sales tax for them. The retailer, however,
>is not obligated, legally (yet anyway) or otherwise, to comply. I
>understand most other states have the same type of law as Kalifornia.
>
>So there. . .

Exactly right.  The retailer has no legal obligation to collect the tax,
since they are not doing business in the state of California.  They can
"ask" all they want, but it usually doesn't accomplish much.

So...if you live in California...take the short drive to Oregon and make
all your purchases there.  (Oregon has no sales tax)

-Drew in Charlotte-
 KF4DDM



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!parsifal.nando.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (George McCrary)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: H.R.E. BUYS HAM GEAR
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 16:48:40 GMT
Organization: News & Observer Public Access
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <431pb7$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <4319qa$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vyger408.nando.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99a.107

I hope he takes the nice message to heart!



                73 DE KQ4QM



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!erinews.ericsson.se!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!news
From: [e-mail] (Mike Groves)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Small transmitter and rec
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 17:07:41 GMT
Organization: Ericsson North America, Inc.
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <431q33$[e-mail]>
References: <42tsk0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc125011.exu.ericsson.se
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

For a great WWW page that combines model rocketry and amateur radio,
(and several other interests) try WWW.IRVING.ORG.  Don Irving (N6DRB)
is a friend of mine and maintains a very impressive (award winning)
home page.  Lots of related links too.  --Mike  KD6PKJ



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!news-mail-gateway
From: [e-mail] (VEKINIS Peter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mods for Uniden 66 PCXl
Date: 11 Sep 95 17:12:00 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <3053EE9B@smtp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: [e-mail]


Hi,
it looks to me as though you have the technical interest to perhaps do a ham
test. You know, with the technician class license you can do a test very
easily WITHOUT morse code. You answer about 55 questions and thats it!

The ARRL has a Video package that makes it very easy to learn which you can
borrow from your library. For small time CBers like you (or for anyone with
interest in the field), it is not very difficult and opens up new bands.

And you can remain a CBer if you like as well.

As far as mods are concerned, I dont have any, but if you get magazines such
as Popular Comms and Monitoring times, info is provided about modifying your
radios.

Good luck,

Peter, KC1QF
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!news.bu.edu!mi
From: [e-mail] (Mikhail Teterin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: European Radio Stations in USA
Date: 11 Sep 1995 17:24:23 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <431rc7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: csb.bu.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13800 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16895 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86401

I'm looking for a radio (possibly, portable) which will be able to
get European AM stations. I've already tried Sony and Grundig por-
tables, but I can not listen to, say Voice of America (they broadcast
in Russian from Eastern Europe). Thanks in advance for any hints. Ple-
ase, reply be e-mail ([e-mail]). Sincerely,
        -mi
--
Θ ╨╒╙╘╪ ╬╔╦╘╧ ╬┼ ╒╩─ú╘ ╧┬╔╓┼╬╬┘═...
                -- Why is that 2 o'clock all the time?!
                -- It is a manometer!!!


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.eden.com!matrix.eden.com!n5kzw
From: "Edwin J. Bailen" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: WTB: Hickock AN/USM-118B CAL Module & Cardsets
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:20:47 -0500
Organization: Adhesive Media, Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/[e-mail]>
References: <42olsf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: matrix.eden.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <42olsf$[e-mail]>

Don't give up on reverse-engineering the module.  With patience, a small
dentist's pick, (and maybe a Dremel tool) it is possible to get the epoxy
off.

   Ed Bailen -- N5KZW
          Information Systems should be tools, not excuses.

On 8 Sep 1995, Michael Hathaway wrote:

> I recently fried the CAL module on my Hickock tube tester, and since
> it's potted in epoxy it's impossible to reverse engineer.  Does anyone
> have a schematic, a spare module, cardsets, or even a complete
> operational tester
>
>  they'd like to sell?  Any and all help will be greatly appreciated,
> and promptly rewarded.
>
> Mike Hathaway
>
> [e-mail]
>
>


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
From: Shawn Wolski <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Stock FT-8500 Hardware Q
Date: 11 Sep 1995 19:28:59 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <4322lr$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-14-4.ots.utexas.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)


I was wondering...does anyone know what generally comes with
the FT-8500 (assuming no optional accessories are purchased
with it)?  TNX et 73.

____________________________________________________________
Shawn Wolski, N5UNA
[e-mail]
http://wwwvms.utexas.edu/~n5una/index.html




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 11 Sep 1995 19:59:47 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 22
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <432ihj$[e-mail]>
References: <42v2pb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42v2pb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (jdb )
writes:

>" WE DO NOT SELL AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF >TRANSMITTINGTO
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT HAVE AN AMATEUR RADIO >LICENSE."

Legitimate question:  I currently  work for a company that has the need
for rf sources to drive various goodies we make.  Has nothing to with
radios.  Nothing.  Say for example, a ham tranceiver, hf, vhf, what ever
turns out to be a good, cheap rf source or driver.  It's off the shelf, we
can buy it, turn it on and use it. If it blow up, toss it.  It's cheap.
The other option is a signal generator (expensive) or oscillator, followed
by a wide band, high gain distributed amplifier (even more expensive) of
the Kalmus, ENI, or Amplifier Reseach variety.  Would we be refused?  I
guess so under that policy.  Granted, it doesn't happen often, but it
happens.  A lost sale is a lost sale.  I remember one place I worked at
MANY years ago had Drake 2NT's with 27.120 crystals ( is that it, the ISM
freq) scattered all over the joint used as cheap rf sources.  Hardly
illegal.  Being a ham it made  me cringe a bit, wish I had one.  But not
illegal.

Pat - KE1C


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 19:59:48 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 23
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <432ihk$[e-mail]>
References: <42vpe4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <42vpe4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Drew Durigan) writes:

>on a bull..."
>
>(ROTFLMAO!!)
>
>That's good, that's VERY good!
>
>

Well I try to be expressive without being obscene.  Communicting the point
is important to me.  Another variant of this would be to replace 'bull'
with 'boar hog'.  Works just as good.  I have others, but not in a public
forum such as this.  I WILL end up insulting somebody which I don't care
to do, for now..  Lets stay with the radio subject, and not veer to far
off course here.  I can do that very easily.

Bottom line, I guess for the bucks, the HTX 202 is a fairly decent radio.

Cheers.

Pat, KE1C


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!jobone!fiesta.srl.ford.com!eccdb1.pms.ford.com!usenet
From: Bill Meahan <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HT for 220 recommendation?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 20:12:27 GMT
Organization: Ford Motor Company - End User Support (North Amer.)
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <43257b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tso144.fs.ford.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Our local RACES group (in formation) is going to be putting up a repeater
shortly.  This repeater will be on 220 MHz and, you guessed it, I have no
equipment for 220, so I'd like to get an HT for the band. I really don't
give a rip about having 50 gazillion memories or require something
smaller than an Altoids box.  I'd just like a reliable, inexpensive,
fairly rugged HT for which batteries are (still) readily available.

Shoot, even an older 6-channel crystal-controlled job would do fine.
What should I look for (new or used)?

tnx es 73 de wa8tzg
--
Bill Meahan  [e-mail]
Ford Motor Company -- End User Support - North America
Not an official statement of Ford Motor Company or anyone else
except the author.




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:28 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: European Radio Stations in USA
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <431rc7$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:34:54 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13799 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16893 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86399

Do you mean you want to recieve European AM stations on our BC band?
That's not possible with any radio from here.


Mikhail Teterin ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I'm looking for a radio (possibly, portable) which will be able to
: get European AM stations. I've already tried Sony and Grundig por-
: tables, but I can not listen to, say Voice of America (they broadcast
: in Russian from Eastern Europe). Thanks in advance for any hints. Ple-
: ase, reply be e-mail ([e-mail]). Sincerely,
:       -mi
: --
: Θ ╨╒╙╘╪ ╬╔╦╘╧ ╬┼ ╒╩─ú╘ ╧┬╔╓┼╬╬┘═...
:               -- Why is that 2 o'clock all the time?!
:               -- It is a manometer!!!
--
  Steve
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Tebbetts)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Packet & Other Digital Communication
Date: 11 Sep 1995 20:41:00 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 16
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4326ss$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap4.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Hello:

     I enjoy monitoring radio transmissions from public safety agencies,
air-traffic and ham radio.  I have a question about monitoring digital
comunication.  I have seen packet demonstrated using a PC.  I am curious.
 Is this interface card able to inturpet most or all data transmissions?
If not, does such a card exist?  The reason I ask is that I would also
enjoy monitoring Computer Aided Dispatching of police units, taxi
services, paging companies, and other entities that use digital
comunication.

     Please e-mail any helpful responses.  Thanks!!
-
  JEFF TEBBETTS  [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bill Howell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: MFJ-422B Keyer & TS-440?
Date: 11 Sep 1995 21:20:25 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43296p$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lites3.pac.utexas.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4

I purchased used, an MFJ-422B keyer/paddle to use with my Kenwood ts-440s/at.
It doesn't work correctly when the "direct out" is connected to the 440s' key jack.
The "grid block out" jack doesn't work either  *unless* I reverse the hot and ground leads.
Has anyone else experienced this? This same problem occured when this keyer was used with an Icom rig.

My question is: is it normal to have to reverse the keying lines, or is something wacky with the MFJ?

Thanks,
Bill Howell N5ALO
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bill Howell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Needed re: TS820S Display
Date: 11 Sep 1995 21:31:39 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <4329rr$[e-mail]>
References: <431hbb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lites3.pac.utexas.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4

In article <431hbb$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Steve Thomason) says:
>
>Has anyone had any trouble with a Kenwood TS820S digital diplay?  Mine
>
********************
I once had an intermittent (on-off) display and the cure was to put
a star-type lockwasher under the display mounting foot screw (better ground).

Bill N5ALO
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!lsi.lsil.com!aeis13!randys
From: [e-mail] (Randy Shore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 11 Sep 1995 22:45:04 GMT
Organization: LSI Logic Corporation
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <432e5g$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: 147.145.46.113


>A bill is annually introduced in Congress to *force* mail order companies
>to collect the appropriate sales tax for the State of the purchaser. So
>far it hasn't passed, but its only a matter of time. A bill has passed
>that says if a company does business in a State, it has to collect sales
>tax for sales to people of that State, even if the sale is mail ordered
>from another of the company's storefronts in another State. (HRO, AES,
>etc fall under this law for States in which they have a point of presence.)
>
>Gary Coffman KE4ZV


Who pays the sales tax if an order is placed over the phone with a company
which is located in a foreign country and it is shipped back the the States ?

Randy  KC6AND



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!bdt.com!news.ossi.com!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!csus.edu!csusac!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!isnews.csc.calpoly.edu!ohm.elee.calpoly.edu!ceustaqu
From: Cal Eustaquio <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Mac Key
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 22:51:50 -0700
Organization: Cal Poly State University
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ohm.elee.calpoly.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
NNTP-Posting-User: ceustaqu

Looking for an S-600, P-500, or CP-500 Mac-Key for my 1940's station I'm
setting up. The key must be in good condition. Thanks. Cal, N6KYR.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!news
From: POTEET MC <l040350>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Info Request: Index Labs QRP Plus transceiver
Date: 11 Sep 1995 23:13:30 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <432fqq$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.lfwc.lockheed.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4d)
To: [e-mail]
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

I am not certain this is the proper forum for this request for information
   but ...

    I am considering the purchase of an Index Labs QRP transceiver.  I would
    appreciate any information on the characteristics of the "box" such as
    noise floor, dynamic range, intercept point(s), etc.  If you have
"hands-on"
    experience any comments on the receiver response to strong in-band/out-of-
    band signals, contest conditions (i.e., lots of signals), general coverage
    performance, scaf filter performance, AGC characteristics, audio output
    (noisy?), ease of "control" adjustments, etc.

    Also (whew!), how's the transmitter, both on cw and ssb?

                            Thanks

                            Mike  W5FTD



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.cybercom.com!usenet
From: Stephan Rashkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Help - Ham-stores in Philadelphia ??
Date: 11 Sep 1995 23:23:07 GMT
Organization: CyberComm Online Services
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <432gcr$[e-mail]>
References: <42mdtt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: raven.cybercomm.net
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16905 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86412

[e-mail] (Knut Terje Ulvund) wrote:
>
> CQ CQ , calling hams in or nearby Philadelphia, PA.
>
> My name is Terje, Call-sign LA8RIA.
> I am going to visit Philadelphia between Fri 15. sep. 95
> and Sat. 23. sep. 95.
> During this week I am interested in visiting one or more
> ham-stores to pick up an all mode 2m or 2m/70cm transceiver.
>
> Are there anyone out there who can help me out locating ham-stores
> in or nearby the City.
>
> I will attend the International Oracle User Week at the
> Pennsylvania Convention Center.
>
> Answers are preferrably recieved by mail to :
> [e-mail]
>
> Many thanks in advance !!
>
> 73's de Terje
> --
> +-----------------------------------------------+
> !  Knut Terje Ulvund                            !
> !  Headquarters - Defense Command Norway        !
> !  Email      : [e-mail]                !
> !  Tel. job   : ([phone]               !
> !  Tel. priv  : ([phone]               !
> !  Packet-BBS : LA8RIA@LA4O                     !
> !                                               !
> ! 'f U cnt rd ths, U'r nt a prgrmr !            !
> +-----------------------------------------------+


Also reminded by wn2k about HRO in Delaware..(that's where I do
my shopping)..Bob is very helpful & patient) it's not exactly that
close to Phila., but worth the trip if you have the transportation
and time

Steve, WA2NHZ

ps Bob do I get a discount off Icom 706 now?




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Evhen Tupis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 4Sale: 432 MHz 250w Amp
Date: 11 Sep 1995 23:35:00 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <432h34$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc3-11.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Sep 11  4:35:00 PM PDT 1995

N3CX modified AM6154 FAA amplifier w/tube.  Never put on the air, very
clean.  7-10 watts of drive = 250 watts out.  With the modification
documentation.  $300 shipped continental U.S.  I need the amp, but I
need the $'s more :).
-= Ev Tupis, WB2ELB =-
Home: 716/638-8269
Work: 716/621-1000 x2390
EMail:[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!news.duke.edu!solaris.cc.vt.edu!mkeitz
From: [e-mail] (Mike Keitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help Needed re: TS820S Display
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 95 00:06:09 GMT
Organization: TSE Systems
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <432ivp$[e-mail]>
References: <431hbb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mkeitz.beve.blacksburg.va.us
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

In article <431hbb$[e-mail]>,
   [e-mail] (Steve Thomason) wrote:
>Has anyone had any trouble with a Kenwood TS820S digital diplay?  Mine
>is a little flaky at times, and reads 2KC high on 40 meters, and a
>couple of MC off on 20, 15, and 10.
>
This is a classic problem.  You need to take apart the shielded box that
holds the frequency counter logic and resolder all the top-layer wires on
the PCBs well.  They used dual-layer PCBs without plated through holes,
counting on conduction through IC and component pins.  Don't even bother
looking for the particular bad connections; resolder everything.  If you
miss one it will go bad later and you'll have to do it again.  After
resoldering from the top, look at the bottom (non-component side) solder
and make sure none of the connections there have gone 'cold' from the
initial factory job or heating at the top.  Then reassemble the radio,
making sure all the ground screws are in solidly, and you should get at
least consistent, though still possibly 2 KHz off results.  This error
could be coming from the reference crystal oscillator (also inside the
logic box, I believe) being mistuned as well as a bad connection or logic
problem.

-Mike KD4QDM


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!infoseek.com!bug.rahul.net!a2i!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 12 Sep 95 01:09:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <42vjeh$[e-mail]>
Lines: 26

TO>>>FWIW, I sold at least three radios yesterday to unlicensed
TO>>>individuals.

TO>>Do you sell equipment as a sideline, or is it a legitimate business?
TO>>If it's a business, you should back up your convictions by posting
TO>>its name here.
TO>>73,
TO>>Jack  WB3U
TO>Why?  So that he can be black-listed by the amateur community?
TO>I don't think so!

TO>Jay
TO>N2OTK

I agree with Jay.  There is a lot of nonsense prejudice out there.  For
safety's sake, I'd suggest not posting the business name.  Besides, I
hardly see what usefulness it would serve.
Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Press "+" to see another tagline.
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA         SYSOP: Steve Diggs
Phone: [phone]                Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!boltons.demon.co.uk
From: Al Bolton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: European Radio Stations in USA
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 95 07:17:56 GMT
Organization: The UK/Slovak Co.
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <431rc7$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: boltons.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13807 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16902 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86410

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] "Steve Ellington" writes:
> Do you mean you want to recieve European AM stations on our BC band?
> That's not possible with any radio from here.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well that simply isn't true! You can pick up medium wave signals from Europe in
the US if you have a good selective receiver and preferably a loop antenna.
I have personally logged many European stations on medium and long wave when I
was over visiting my dad in Connecticut last Fall. You have to listen when
there is darkness over Europe and you need patience. Signals are quite
often weak and there is a problem of heterodynes as the European band on
medium wave uses 9kHz spacing and the USA uses 10kHz.

If you use short wave it is very easy to pick up European stations, including
Radio Liberty and VOA from their various tx sites in Europe.

I'll Email Mikhail to help him.

ORIGINAL POSTING>
> Mikhail Teterin ([e-mail]) wrote:
> : I'm looking for a radio (possibly, portable) which will be able to
> : get European AM stations. I've already tried Sony and Grundig por-
> : tables, but I can not listen to, say Voice of America (they broadcast
> : in Russian from Eastern Europe). Thanks in advance for any hints. Ple-
> : ase, reply be e-mail ([e-mail]). Sincerely,
> :       -mi
> : --
> :      ...
> :               -- Why is that 2 o'clock all the time?!
> :               -- It is a manometer!!!
> --
>   Steve
> [e-mail]
>
>
>

--
________________
Al Bolton.
OK8VSQ/OM/G4VSQ.
Caversham, UK.
G-QRP 8741.
----------------


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!boltons.demon.co.uk
From: Al Bolton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: R5 or Butternut HF-6VX or Hustler 5-BTV  ?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 95 07:30:51 GMT
Organization: The UK/Slovak Co.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <432r1h$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: boltons.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29

In article <432r1h$[e-mail]> [e-mail] "BUDDY10" writes:
> Whichc of these Verticals do you think is best ?   I have heard mostly BAD
> things about the GAP's ,so those are out of the running.  Mostly
> interested in using the vertical for it's low radiation angle for DX'ing(i
> know a beam would be better).
> Thanks !
> Scott Powell
> KD6GPV
> General since 1995 !
>


The Butternut is best! But only if you have a good and extensive earth.....
--
________________
Al Bolton.
OK8VSQ/OM/G4VSQ.
Caversham, UK.
G-QRP 8741.
----------------


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!agate!boulder!news.coop.net!news.den.mmc.com!news.vf.mmc.com!eng106!tcmayo
From: tcmayo@eng106 (Tom Mayo N1RMU)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HT for 220 recommendation?
Date: 12 Sep 1995 13:47:19 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Martin Corp, Valley Forge PA
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <434317$[e-mail]>
References: <43257b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eng106.psf.ge.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Bill Meahan ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Our local RACES group (in formation) is going to be putting up a repeater
: shortly.  This repeater will be on 220 MHz and, you guessed it, I have no
: equipment for 220, so I'd like to get an HT for the band. I really don't
: give a rip about having 50 gazillion memories or require something
: smaller than an Altoids box.  I'd just like a reliable, inexpensive,
: fairly rugged HT for which batteries are (still) readily available.

Bill-

Why not get an Icom 2AT.  It's rugged, reliable, and the batteries are
very common (compatible with the Radio Shack HTX-202).  Two things to
consider are (1) does the repeater require a PL tone? (if so, maybe the
IC-2AT will not work for you), (2) what HTs do you currently have (you
might want to get something that uses the same batteries so you can use
them for multiple radios.

Good luck.

-Tom

--
  _____________
 /___   ______/\       Tom Mayo  N1RMU
 \__/  /\_____\/
   /  /_/_______     e-mail: [e-mail]
  /  __   __   /\   home: [e-mail]
 /  /\/  /\/  / /  packet: N1RMU @ WA2UMX.#ENY.NY.US.NA
/__/ /__/ /__/ /  For my PGP public key, e-mail me at work
\__\/\__\/\__\/  with subject send_pgp_key.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 12 11:10:42 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!dgf
From: [e-mail] (David Feldman)
Subject: Re: Info Request: Index Labs QRP Plus transceiver
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Organization? Me?
References: <432fqq$[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 14:22:25 GMT
Lines: 10
Sender: [e-mail]

In article <432fqq$[e-mail]> POTEET MC <l040350> writes:
>I am not certain this is the proper forum for this request for information
>   but ...
>
>    I am considering the purchase of an Index Labs QRP transceiver.  I would

Please e-mail me direct and I'll send you a review I wrote. Your reply-to
e-mail address is not properly formed (complain to your system admin!)

73 Dae WB0GAZ [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:53:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!news3.mr.net!mr.net!news.mr.net!urvile.msus.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Paul L. Schumacher)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help needed with a 2m amp (Henry 130A02)
Date: 13 Sep 1995 02:37:38 GMT
Organization: Winona State University
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <435g5i$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.17.133.40
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

I recently bought a 2m "brick" at a hamfest.  It is a Henry 130A02R.

It has low output (about 20 watts).

Does anyone have a service manual, circuit diagram etc. to aid me in
repairing this amp?

If so, please email to me at the email address shown.

thanks much,

73   Paul K0ZYV


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:53:57 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!ncrgw2.ncr.com!ncrhub2!ncrcae!news
From: Ted Webb <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: WANTED: Uniden President HR2600 mod info
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (news)
Reply-To: [e-mail] (webbte)
Organization: AT&T Global Information Solutions
X-Newsreader: DiscussIT 2.5.0.10 for MS Windows [AT&T Software Products Division]
References: <439enl$[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 18:52:45 GMT
Lines: 24

Timo - no need to perform surgery. Down East has an attenuator kit that works
with their transverter to lower the output without getting inside the rig
itself.

de Ted / AC4CS
==========Timo Kolehmainen, 9/14/95==========

I own that HR2600 rig, and I have seen mods for it in recent QST, but I
haven't
seen any for the HR2510...

I'd like to use that 10m rig
for 70 cm transverter use. I need to extend the frequency coverage from the
current 28MHz..29.7MHz to be able to use the full 70cm band. I also need
to adjust the power down to few dBm0s for the transverter, alternatively I
could connect to a point before the PA and disable the PA if I knew how.
Any pointers to service manual or modification info is greatly appreciated.
--
                Timo Kolehmainen        OH8MBP
                tel. [phone]
                fax. [phone], email: [e-mail]





From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:53:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.unb.ca!nbt.nbnet.nb.ca!CommSet
From: [e-mail] (Stephen Mallory)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RE: TM 241-A Mod.
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 23:22:44 AST
Organization: NB*Net
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynam13.nbnet.nb.ca
X-Newsreader: CommSet NewsReader Ver: 01 Rev: 0033

Some one was looking for the mods for the Knwood TM-241-A.  I finally found
them, so here they are.

73...Steve...VE9SHM


From: [e-mail] (robert.f.casey)
Subject: TM421a TX mod file
Date: 19 Oct 91 03:23:18 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 30


copied from packet:
 Msg# TSF  Size #Rd  Date  Time From   MsgID        To
63056 BF   1307   1 14-Oct 1645 N2FWQ  49200_N2IMC  MODS@ALLBBS ()
 Sb: knwood tm421a mods

This mod is only intended for experimental applications only! Know what
freq you are on and don't use this mod if you are not for sure.
The TM-421a is capable of transmitting from 136 to 174 MHz when the following
modification is performed. The transmitter specifications will vary from
published in-band specifications.

1. Remove the top and bottom covers from the transciever.
2. Remove the knobs from the front panel.
3. Remove the nut from the mic jack and the nut from the channel selector
   switch.
4. Remove the 4 screws that secure the front panel to the body of the
   transceiver
5. Pull the front panel off the transceiver to expose the Control board.
6. Remove the 3 screws from the Control board. Gently pull the board off
   the transceiver.
7. Cut the GREEN jumper wire on the Control board.
8. Install an MA141A chip diode or 1N914 diode as D209 on the Control
   Board.
9. Reassemble the transceiver by reversing steps 1 - 6.
10. Reset the microprocessor by holding in the MR key as power is turned
    on.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't tried or verified this, proceed at your own risk.  WA2ISE
And do not transmit outside of legal bands!



Copied from the QRZ! Windows Ham Radio CDROM




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:53:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!chrisss.demon.co.uk
From: [e-mail] (Chris Selwyn-Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,sci.electronics.repair,uk.radio.amateur.
Subject: Faulty 2 meter ssb TR 7010  TX/RX help needed
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 01:06:47 GMT
Organization: Landscape Services
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chrisss.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: chrisss.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16984 sci.electronics.repair:12724

Hi

I Have a Trio TR7010 2 metre ssb tranceiver Which is refusing to
resolve signals  the only clue I can come up with is V.hot AF power
transistors .

I looked in to sending it off for repair  but was told it would cost
ú35.00 an hour plus parts and as the set is pretty old it really
wouldn't be worth the expence.

is this a common problem on this set ?

can any one maybe explain the fault to me and a remedy.?

it seems to me that the AF transistors are displaying a symptom and
possibly not the cause am I right.

any help  in repairing this set would be greatfully appreciated.

Thanks
Chris Selwyn-Smith   Landscape Services
       [e-mail]
    G1RQZ                Hampton Court



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:53:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!usenet
From: "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Announcing Kenwood TS-870S All-Mode HF
Date: 15 Sep 1995 02:02:47 GMT
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43ams7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Announcing The Kenwood TS-870S HF All-Mode Transceiver with Next
Generation IF-Stage DSP. The Intelligent Digital Enhanced Communications
System by Kenwood.

<a
href="http://www.accessnv.com/kenwood/">http://www.accessnv.com/kenwood/<
/A>





From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!news.delphi.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Adam Newlin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Fair Price for a Kenwood TS-440s
Date: 15 Sep 1995 02:11:24 GMT
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 6
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[6818]
Message-ID: <43ancc$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp3.cac.psu.edu
X-Posted-From: InterNews [e-mail]
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.

I have an extra TS-440S laying around and I was wondering what a fair
price would be for this rig?  It was literally *never* used and comes
with a power supply

Thanks,
Adam


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!chip!szrwryan
From: [e-mail] (Richard Ryan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Duplexer Wanted 2 Mtr/440
Date: 15 Sep 1995 03:40:46 GMT
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43asju$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chip.ucdavis.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Looking for a duplexer for my dual band radio.
440/ 2 Meter
Thanks   Rich       WB6HNC   [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.delphi.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.cybercom.com!usenet
From: Stephan Rashkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: GPS Receiver
Date: 15 Sep 1995 06:44:05 GMT
Organization: CyberComm Online Services
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <43b7bn$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: raven.cybercomm.net

[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>
> In article <[e-mail]> Scott Remington <[e-mail]> writes:
> >I am considering purchasing a GPS receiver in the immediate future and would
> >like comments on the various models currently on the market.  Personal
> >experience and/or rumors greatly appreciated.  I've been looking at the Sony
> >IPS760 because of the immediate bells&whistles reaction.
>
> The Garmin 45 is the value leader. It's a slick and tiny little box
> that works very well, is gentle on batteries, and floats. Magellan
> and Trimble offering are also good units. You don't want that Sony pig.
> Every one I've tried had trouble acquiring and keeping the satellites,
> much worse than even my antique Icom GPS which is also a battery gobbling
> pig that demands an external amplified antenna to work in a car. You can
> just throw the little Garmin up on the dash and it's a happy camper, I've
> even seen it work while lying in the passenger seat.
>
> Discount Marine, or one of the other marine chains, have the best
> prices, and often have sales with even better prices. Last I looked
> the Garmin 45 was $199, but I've seen it on sale for even less.
>
> Gary
> --
> Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
> Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
> 534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
> Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


I agree with you on the Garmin 45...I am very happy with mine,
but where did you see them for 199 bucks or less...I got mine
this summer for 270 bucks and I thought that was good.

Steve, WA2NHZ



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.cybercom.com!usenet
From: Stephan Rashkin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help with TS-440S/TS-450S
Date: 15 Sep 1995 07:18:31 GMT
Organization: CyberComm Online Services
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <43b9c7$[e-mail]>
References: <43b288$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: raven.cybercomm.net

[e-mail] (PeterJS) wrote:
>
> I've got a TS-450S-AT connected to an R7 vertical and
> started comparing the SWR readings of the internal SWR
> meter on the transciever to an external SWR/Power meter
> between the antennae feed line and the transciever.  On 17, 15,
> 12 and 10 meters, the readings on the TX and the external SWR meter
> agree but on 20, 30 and 40 meters, the transciever SWR meter shows
> a very nice 1-1.5 SWR reading on these bands when using the
> auto tune feature but meanwhile, the external SWR/Power meter
> shows SWR readings of greater than 3:1 on 20/30/40.  I think I've got a
> problem with the tuner on the TS-450S-AT but in discussions
> with Kenwood tech support, they say I don't have a problem - if the
> SWR reading on the transciever is fine, then the circuit is tuned
> AND in fact, the external SWR meter shouldn't necessarily agree with
> what the transciever reads.  This makes no sense to me.
>
> Two questions:
>
> For those out there with TS440/T450 rigs who happen to also
> use an external SWR meter separate from the on-board meter in
> the TS-440/TS450, do you find differences in SWR readings
> between the rig and the external meter?
>
> Is this really true that there should be no relationship between
> the on-board SWR reading in the TS440/TS450 and the external
> meter?  I would think that the readings would be slightly different
> but in my case, the differences are so great to make me think that
> the TS-450S didn't tune the circuit right on the above bands in the first
> place as evidenced by the terrible reading on the external SWR meter.
>
> Thanks ... Peter, KE6VMJ


Pete
The tuner in the 450 is matching the rig and it's meter to the
antenna, but remember the antenna hasn't changed..Since the
external meter is on the antenna it will still read the antenna's
swr..which will not be the same as the internal swr meter before
the 450's tuner.

Steve, WA2NHZ




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.bnl.gov!degen.rhic.bnl.gov!user
From: [e-mail] (Christopher M. Degen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RC-1000 Repeater Controller???
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:00:16 -0400
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <439hqp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: degen.rhic.bnl.gov

In article <439hqp$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Bruce Tenison) wrote:

> Hi All!  We're trying to get our club off the ground here in south Alabama
> (North Baldwin ARC) and are interested in upgrading our local repeater.
> At this point, we don't have a lot of money to spend on a controller, but
> have been looking at a controller marketed by Micro Computer Concepts in
> New Port Richey, Florida.  It's called the RC-1000.  Basically, I wanted
> to know if there is anyone out there using these and if so, what you
> think of them.


We've had ours for 6 years, and have been through 2 upgrades. Works flawlessly.

--
   **************************************************************
   * Christopher M. Degen    N2JCB   * Internet: [e-mail] *
   * Brookhaven National Laboratory  * DECnet: BNLCL1::DEGEN    *
   * Building 1005                   *                          *
   * Upton NY 11973 USA              *                          *
   **************************************************************


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!nntp.hk.super.net!tst.hk.super.net!vr2pk
From: [e-mail] (Mr. Leung Wai Hung)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: test
Date: 15 Sep 1995 10:49:15 GMT
Organization: Hong Kong Supernet
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43blnb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: is3.hk.super.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

testing.....


73



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Ray Johnston)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Info on RF 675 Antenna Coupler
Date: 15 Sep 1995 11:21:56 -0400
Organization: Digital Visions Corporation
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43c5mk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: navajo.gate.net

I am looking for any information on an RF 675 Antenna Coupler
made by RF Communications, Inc.  If anyone has a company address,
telephone number, manual, etc., please contact me.

Thanks...

Ray

-- Sorry if this is a dupe, our mail site is acting up --

--
--------

Ray Johnston ([e-mail]) Boca Raton FL USA


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!Dortmund.Germany.EU.net!Uni-Dortmund.DE!ampere!potempa
From: [e-mail] (Jaroslaw Potempa)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Q : STANDARD C420 E
Date: 15 Sep 1995 11:31:14 GMT
Organization: Uni Dortmund, Physik
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <43bo62$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ampere.physik.uni-dortmund.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Do somebody know how to expand the frequency range of STANDARD's
handheld UHF FM transceiver C420 E ( E = Europe version, 430 - 440 MHz).

 Jaroslaw Potempa
 [e-mail]
 DB6EF



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!woodybbs!1-289-81-0!richard.anderson
From: [e-mail] (Richard Anderson)
Date: 15 Sep 95 11:40:05
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: WoodyWare Software, Inc.
Lines: 24

 -=> Quoting Jeffrey D. Stai to All <=-


 >I have a 2m Allmode (FT-290) and would like to get on 6m.  Is a
 >2m to 6m transverter available?

I think (someone told me about this ) that their is a 10meter to
6meter converter... Their is a kit that you can get that U build
that will convert 10 to 6... look in some of the ham magines (SP)
(wont plug just one, their tooo many and dont want to offend)

But their several kits that you can get and on 6meters..


Richard...........N0ZDZ....


... Reality-ometer:  [\........]  Hmmph!  Thought so...
--
|Fidonet:  Richard Anderson 1:289/81
|Internet: [e-mail]
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.iadfw.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Floyd Adams)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RF output on TS-440S?
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:14:15 GMT
Organization: Internet America
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <43c56k$[e-mail]>
References: <430kao$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dal09-18.ppp.iadfw.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (Max Sabo) wrote:

>I am kind of embarassed to ask this question, but I own a TS-440S and I
>have never figured out how to turn down the RF output going to the
>antenna.  There is an AF knob, which is the volume, and then there is an
>RF knob, which seems to only attenuate the RF coming into the set on
>recieve.  Is it possible to turn down the RF output to do something in the
>range of QRP, or is it always at 100watts output?

>Any help will be appreciated.

>Max
>N7NWG

Max, I also own a TS-440.  I had the same question and was told by an
individual that was selling one at a sidewalk sale that it was very
easy to adjust the power level.  He said that there is a pin on the
rear 6 pin Din accessory jack (remote connector) that is for ALC input
feedback from an amplifier.  It is pin 6.  He said that if you
regulate a voltage and apply it to this pin and ground, it will reduce
the output.  He suggested that I use a 9 volt battery and a pot to
adjust the level to the desired output.  I never got around to trying
it, but it appears that it will work, since this ALC input is designed
to reduce the drive to the amplifier.  If you try it, please let me
know if and how good it works. 73's

Floyd Adams  WD5ENJ



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:10 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!pgh!jrosenw
From: [e-mail] (JOHN E. ROSENWALD)
Subject: Re: Spahn Ranch linked with 2 Murders in Phili
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:38:50 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <43bs4t$[e-mail]>
Organization: Nauticom - Internet Access Provider
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 14

Robert D Houghton ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Am I missing something here?

No, I do not think you are missing anything.
What I want to know about this thread, is what kind of antenna was used
for this 'link' to Spahn Ranch ?

(-:  Keep Smiling  :-)

--
  +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
  | John E. Rosenwald     | It is devastating to think that God will have |
  | [e-mail]  | you spend eternity with people that you won't |
  | Amateur Radio: NM3P   | even speak to right now.                      |


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!wantree.com.au!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Koh Electronics)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED HF LINEAR AMP
Date: 15 Sep 1995 16:35:51 GMT
Organization: Wantree Development
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43ca17$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin10.wantree.com.au
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

HI,
I am after a HF Linear Amplifier about 1kw in Power.
Please leave me a message here or at VK6ANC Packet BBS.
Thanks
Ben VK6XC


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.aero.org!news2.aero.org!greenberg-t.aero.org!user
From: [e-mail] (Steve )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Spahn Ranch linked with 2 Murders in Phili
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Date: 15 Sep 1995 17:44:02 GMT
Organization: Aerospace Corp
Lines: 21
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: greenberg-t.aero.org

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(cleopatra) wrote:
>
> Last Sunday Night, Spahn Ranch, the up and coming LA based Hard Tek band
> played a amazing show at Phili nught Club The Asylum.  There is Strong
> evidence that a member of the audience murdered a young women and a 2 year
> old child a few  hour before the show. The Asylum, Spahn Ranch and The
> Electric Hellfire Club are now beeing questioned about the incidences of that
> night. News Reports called the guy a "vampire" because of the brutalness of
> the murders. The mans alibi for the many scratches on his face was that he
> had been mossing at Spahn Ranch.......Or was it a plot by Spahn Ranch and the
> Electric Hellfire Club to turn their audience members into blood thirsty
> killers!!!! Spahn Ranchand Electric Hellfire Club could not be reached for a
> statement.

Cleo forgot to mention in the above article that the "vampire" was also a
ham...

Could be those scratches were really caused by a "rubber ducky"!




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ssi.syspac.com!rnb.syspac.com!dnorris
From: [e-mail] (Dean Norris)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: DX-70T Expanded freqs
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:07:13 LOCAL
Organization: Systems Solutions Inc.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rnb.syspac.com
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]

I am still trying to find out how to 'open up' the rcve & xmit freqs for my
Alinco DX-70T.

If anyone knows the "magic", please let me know.

TIA

Dean


/                    K7NO                 /
*  Man First:  Fights for food            *
*              Then for rights            *
*              Then for power             *
* That is why we can't all just get along *
/ [e-mail]   - 71572.2126 CIS     /


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:14 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!news.ssd.intel.com!ornews.intel.com!chnews!ennews!enuxsa.eas.asu.edu!rutledge
From: [e-mail] (Shawn T. Rutledge)
Subject: Re: Looking for a radio
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:46:32 GMT
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950914093235.8411B-100000@gsu>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: enuxsa.eas.asu.edu
Lines: 23
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86539 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:16999

Rick Huebner ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I am a Paramedic and am looking for a portable radio for personal use.
: It must be programmable transmit/receive for frequencies that I am
: interested in(police, fire, ems, hospital).  These are all VHF freqs and
: must be able to handle programming of PL's for each freq.  I would like
: at least 30 channels that can be scanned.

: I have seen a very nice Kenwood that someone told me was around $700.
: Any recommendations?  Please email me if you don't mind.  Thanks...

Most HT's (walkie-talkies) nowadays have the out-of-band receive feature;
for 2m HT's, it's usually about 130-something to 170-something MHz.  If you
need anything out of this range a 2m HT definitly won't do.  Some
can be modified to transmit out-of-band too.  I don't know about programming
30 channels to be scanned though.  I know there are scanning features but
whether they scan programmed channels or the whole band I'm not sure.
HT's are usually $200-$350 or so; more than that and you can get a dual
or 3 band radio that covers 440 and maybe 220 as well.
--
  _______                KB7PWD @ N7MRP.AZ.US.NOAM    [e-mail]
 (_  | |_)               html: http://enuxsa.eas.asu.edu/~rutledge/home.html
 __) | | \__________________________________________________________________
* techno * virtual reality * capitalism * RISC * Gravis Ultrasound * ARS *


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!hudson.lm.com!news.ysu.edu!yfn.ysu.edu!au156
From: [e-mail] (Hank Riley)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Heathkit VF-7401 (2 Meter VHF) Manual copy wanted
Date: 15 Sep 1995 19:35:44 GMT
Organization: Youngstown State/Youngstown Free-Net
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <43ckig$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: yfn2.ysu.edu


I have a young ham friend (N1VJF, 14 years old) who has a used
Heathkit VF-7401 "Two Meter Digital Scanning Tranceiver" without any
manual.  He would very much appreciate if someone could please copy
at least some portions of the book and schematic. (The "new Heath"
charges a very high price for these manuals.)

If someone would like to help out, please email me.

Hank, N1LTV
[e-mail]
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PTracy)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Announcing Kenwood TS-870S All-Mode HF
Date: 15 Sep 1995 22:49:31 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 15
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43ddvr$[e-mail]>
References: <43ams7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43ams7$[e-mail]>, "Robert A. Kile"
<[e-mail]> writes:

>Subject:       Announcing Kenwood TS-870S All-Mode HF
>From:  "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
>Date:  15 Sep 1995 02:02:47 GMT
>
>Announcing The Kenwood TS-870S HF All-Mode Transceiver with Next
>Generation IF-Stage DSP. The Intelligent Digital Enhanced Communications
>System by Kenwood.
>

How many shipping cartons does it come with for all the guaranteed return
trips to factory for warrenty repairs.  Can I get it with pre-paid and
addressed return labels?  Is this radio guarateed in miles or hours?


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Spahn Ranch linked with 2 Murders in Phili
Date: 15 Sep 1995 22:49:57 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 12
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43de0l$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (Steve ) writes:

>Cleo forgot to mention in the above article that the "vampire" was also a
>ham...
>
>Could be those scratches were really caused by a "rubber ducky"!
>
>
WWell that's the worst news I've heard in a long time. I think Mark
Fuhrman had something to do with this!



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 15 Sep 1995 22:50:23 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 7
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43de1f$[e-mail]>
References: <43d9jv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

For sale. New  3CX15000B7 amplifier. Bandswitched 160 through ten. 285
pound transformer, mercury power contactors, vacuum relays and variables,
full features.

No license required. $7500 firm.

<snicker>


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Dan Brown)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 01:28:45 GMT
Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <43d9jv$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <432lgc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <437r1u$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: a102028.sfo2.as.crl.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (jdb ) wrote:

>Selling a transmitter to an UNLICENSED individual is
>simply WRONG. If a person is interested in becoming a ham
>he DOES not need a rig that will transmit. He needs nothing

        Would you mind explaining, rationally, without resorting to ad hominem
attacks, why it is wrong to sell a transceiver to an unlicensed
individual?  Neither the law nor morals is much based on need.  I
don't need a Porsche, in the strictest sense; that doesn't make it
wrong for me to have one, or for someone to sell it to me.

        I've already explained several legitimate reasons why an unlicensed
person might want to buy a transceiver.  The most basic are these:
(1) the most common advice to people who want to learn code or other
operating practices is to listen on the air, and (2) most new ham
equipment is in the form of transceivers, not separate
transmitter/receivers.

        I bought a 2m HT before I received my license, so I could listen to
the local repeaters and get used to the normal customs there.  Why was
it wrong for the dealer to sell it to me?  Given that it's not wrong
for me to listen to a repeater, why should I have to buy a scanner to
do that, and pay almost as much as I'd pay for the HT?

--
Dan Brown, KE6MKS
[e-mail], NOT [e-mail]
Don't tread on me.



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!usenet
From: "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood Communications Announces TS-870S
Date: 16 Sep 1995 01:36:29 GMT
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <43d9mt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Introducing the remarkable new TS-870S HF All-Mode Transceiver with Next
Generation IF-Stage DSP. The Intelligent Digitally Enhanced
Communications System...

http://www.accessnv.com/kenwood/


de Webmaster KG7D



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: Joe Sanches <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yeasu FT-736R for SALE
Date: 16 Sep 1995 01:37:52 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <43d9pg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sac5-18.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Sep 15  6:37:52 PM PDT 1995
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 16bit)

I have an Yeasu FT-736 R  for sale.

Ideal for Satellite communications (2M/435 MHZ all Mode)

If interested please leave a message at

my Email address.  TNX


Joe  ([e-mail])



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!interactive.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (CGCOM)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: 10Hz-2.4Ghz Freq Counter
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 01:50:21 GMT
Organization: CG Communications
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43dbbl$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: user122.interactive.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99b.112

Optoelectronics Model UTC3000 "Handi-Counter" 10Hz-2.4Ghz
universal frequency counter and timer. Clean, hardly used,
Ask only $199 or best offer. Can ship UPS pre-paid or COD.
-Charlie- [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news1.digital.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!karlsberg.usask.ca!andreas
From: [e-mail] (Andreas Schiffler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 10 A Power Supply For Sale
Date: 16 Sep 1995 02:06:10 GMT
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <43dbei$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: karlsberg.usask.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

NPC 10 A cont. 13.8 V power supply for sale, asking $100, for more info mail
to [e-mail] or call Sasa at [phone].
                                                            73's  Sasa.


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!sparky!nlcnews.nlc.state.ne.us!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Mark D. Conner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Using HT mic on Alinco DR610T
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 02:06:20 GMT
Organization: NLC Nebraska
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43db8i$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: monarch.papillion.ne.us
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17017 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86568 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9495

I recently bought an Alinco DR610T and would like to use my headset
microphone designed to be used with an Alinco/Yaesu/Icom HT.  I've
been told it's possible to make a circuit that will let it work with a
mobile rig without completely tearing apart the mike.  Has anyone
built such a thing?

E-mail responses/copies appreciated, and I'll summarize responses if
desired.

73 de Mark N9XTN



Mark D. Conner
Internet: [e-mail]
AMPRnet:  [e-mail]
"Paradigm shifting without a clutch" - Dogbert




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (bob cocco )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: need manual for R.S. dx-150
Date: 16 Sep 1995 03:36:47 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <43dgof$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-pit2-07.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Sep 15  8:36:47 PM PDT 1995

Hello,

  I am posting this for a freind (KO3L) who is in need of a service
manual or a copy of service manual for a Radio Shack dx-150. Please
e-mail me at ([e-mail]). Thanks in advance.


                            73 de Bob N3LSS


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:24 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!pineapp
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Curry)
Subject: TS-50 Internal Ant Ground Problem
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Netcom-Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:45:05 GMT
Lines: 19
Sender: [e-mail]


   Would like to informed all Kenwood TS-50 owners that Kenwood has
a minor hardware problem . The Problem is after normal installation
in a vehicle. That the ground connection point from the internal SO-259
connector to the Power Amp board will disconnect.

  The fixed from Kenwood was to replace the solid piece of wire
and use a braided piece of wire.

  What lead to this discovery was that my receiver was not hearing
the signal. I would slapped the radio and all was fine. So after digging
into the radio. I had noticed that the ground wire had broken at the
circuit board contact point.

--
.----------------------------------------------+--------------------------.
| INTERNET: [e-mail]     (DC436)     | Daniel Curry             |
| AMPRNET : [e-mail]  [44.4.20.144] | WB6STW                   |
| AX.25   : wb6stw@n0ary.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NA      | DoD # 1450               |
'----------------------------------------------+--------------------------'


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Robert Arnold )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Nicad no! Lithium metal hydride is best.
Date: 16 Sep 1995 05:08:10 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <43dm3q$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sd6-06.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Sep 15 10:08:10 PM PDT 1995

While it is pointed out that alkalines that cost 50 cents and have 1400
mah and that Li metal hydrides cost about $4 to $5.  However the Li
metal hydrides are rechargeable over 500 times that makes the LmH about
1 cent per 1200 mah; that is 50 times the savings.   If you are like me
and take long backpacks with a very light solar setup on top of my
pack, then it is even more odvious why I favor rechargeables.   I
rarely have a dead battery.   73s KD6RMD


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv
From: [e-mail] (Jay Maynard, K5ZC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.info,rec.answers,news.answers
Subject: Guide to the Personal Radio Newsgroups
Supersedes: <radio/[e-mail]>
Followup-To: poster
Date: 16 Sep 1995 06:49:20 GMT
Organization: University of Texas - Houston, General Administration
Lines: 218
Approved: [e-mail],[e-mail]
Distribution: world
Expires: 14 Nov 1995 06:45:29 GMT
Message-ID: <radio/[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Jay Maynard, K5ZC)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Summary: This article provides an overview of the newsgroups devoted
         to the personal radio services (amateur and CB), describes
         each newsgroup and its charter, and gives a brief tutorial
         on netiquette.
Keywords: faq radio amateur ham cb netiquette
X-Last-Updated: 1995/03/16
Originator: [e-mail]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86563 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:13924 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10471 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17012 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9493 rec.radio.amateur.policy:29406 rec.radio.amateur.space:4797 rec.radio.cb:22391 rec.radio.info:9251 rec.answers:13526 news.answers:49537

Posted-By: auto-faq 3.1.1.2
Archive-name: radio/personal-intro
Revision: 2.1 1994/11/01 03:50:23
Posting-Frequency: posted on the 15th of each month

This message describes the rec.radio.amateur.*, rec.radio.cb,
rec.radio.info, and rec.radio.swap newsgroups, as well as their Internet
mailing list counterparts and complements. It is intended to serve as a
guide for the new reader on what to find where. Questions and comments may
be directed to the author, Jay Maynard, K5ZC, by Internet electronic mail at
[e-mail]. This message was last changed on 31 October
1994 to add the discussion of non-Usenet mailing lists and streamline most
of the history discussion, and to change the moderator information for
rec.radio.info.

History
=======

Way back when, before there was a Usenet, the Internet hosted a mailing list
for hams, called (appropriately enough) INFO-HAMS. Ham radio discussions
were held on the mailing list, and sent to the mailboxes of those who had
signed up for it. When the Usenet software was created, and net news as we
now know it was developed, a newsgroup was created for hams: net.ham-radio.
The mailing list and the newsgroup were gatewayed together, eventually.

Over the years, as the net grew, the volume of discussion became
progressively higher. First one by one, and then as part of two
reorganizations, what was once one group became many. In the process,
developments elsewhere on the net were reflected in the groups as they were
created, most notably the change to place all of the ham radio groups in one
hierarchy.

The collection of newsgroups continues to grow as more people join the net,
and as more topics of discussion gain volume, I expect to see more groups be
created as well. This follows what is happening on the rest of the net.

Nearly all of the radio newsgroups have corresponding mailing lists, the
notable exception being rec.radio.swap. There are also a few mailing lists
that don't have newsgroups.

The Current Groups
==================

It's important to post messages to the group that's appropriate for them,
and not to the groups that aren't. The whole idea of having different
newsgroups is so that folks who aren't interested in, say, homebrewing,
don't have to wade through messages about homebrewing on the way to read
about Field Day. Posting appropriately is just good etiquette.

The rec.radio.amateur.misc group is the catchall. It is what rec.ham-radio
was renamed to during the first major reorganization. Any message that's not
more appropriate in one of the other groups belongs here, from contesting to
DX to ragchewing on VHF to information on becoming a ham.

The group rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc is for discussions related to
(surprise!) digital amateur radio. This doesn't have to be the common
two-meter AX.25 variety of packet radio, either; some of the most
knowledgeable folks in radio digital communications can be found here, and
anything in the general area is welcome. The name was changed to emphasize
this, and to encourage discussion not only of other text-based digital
modes, such as AMTOR, RTTY, and Clover, but things like digital voice and
video as well. The former group, rec.radio.amateur.packet, was removed on
September 21st, 1993. It is obsolete, and you should use .digital.misc
instead (or the appropriate new mailing list, mentioned below).  The group
has .misc as part of the name to allow further specialization if the users
wish it, such as .digital.tcp-ip.

The swap group is rec.radio.swap. This recognizes a fact that became
evident shortly after the original group was formed: Hams don't just swap ham
radio gear, and other folks besides hams swap ham equipment. If you have radio
equipment, or test gear, or computer stuff that hams would be interested in,
here's the place. Equipment wanted postings belong here too. Discussions about
the equipment generally don't; if you wish to discuss a particular posting
with the buyer, email is a much better way to do it, and the other groups,
especially .equipment and .homebrew, are the place for public discussions.
There is now a regular posting with information on how to go about buying and
selling items in rec.radio.swap; please refer to it before you post there.
To answer a frequently asked question: No, there is no mailing list that
goes along with this group. If you can't read Usenet news directly, you're
out of luck.

The group rec.radio.amateur.policy was created as a place for all the
discussions that seem to drag on interminably about the many rules,
regulations, legalities, and policies that surround amateur radio, both
existing and proposed.  Recent changes to the Amateur Radio Rules (FCC Part
97) have finally laid to rest the Great Usenet Pizza Autopatch Debate - it's
now legal to order a pizza on the autopatch, if you're not in the pizza
business - as well as complaints about now-preempted local scanner laws
hostile to amateurs, but plenty of discussion about what a bunch of rotten
no-goodniks the local frequency coordinating body is, as well as the
neverending no-code debate, may still be found here.

The group rec.radio.cb is the place for all discussion about the Citizens'
Band radio service. Such discussions have been very inflammatory in
rec.ham-radio in the past; please do not cross-post to both rec.radio.cb and
rec.radio.amateur.* unless the topic is genuinely of interest to both hams
and CBers - and very few topics are.

The rec.radio.info group is just what its name implies: it's the place where
informational messages from across rec.radio.* may be found, regardless of
where else they're posted. As of this writing, information posted to the
group includes Cary Oler's daily solar progagation bulletins, ARRL
bulletins, the Frequently Asked Questions files for the various groups, and
radio modification instructions. This group is moderated, so you cannot post
to it directly; if you try, even if your message is crossposted to one of
the other groups, your message will be mailed to the moderator, who is
currently David Dodell, WB7TPY. The email address for submissions to the
group is [e-mail]. Inquires and other administrivia should be
directed to [e-mail]. For more information about
rec.radio.info, consult the introduction and posting guidelines that are
regularly posted to that newsgroup.

The groups rec.radio.amateur.antenna, .equipment, .homebrew, and .space are
for more specialized areas of ham radio: discussions about antennas,
commercially-made equipment, homebrewing, and amateur radio space operations.
The .equipment group is not the place for buying or selling equipment; that's
what rec.radio.swap is for. Similarly, the .space group is specifically about
amateur radio in space, such as the OSCAR program and SAREX, the Shuttle
Amateur Radio EXperiment; other groups cover other aspects of satellites and
space. Homebrewing isn't about making your own alcoholic beverages at home
(that's rec.crafts.brewing), but rather construction of radio and electronic
equipment by the amateur experimenter.

Except for rec.radio.swap and rec.radio.cb, all of these newsgroups are
available by Internet electronic mail in digest format; send a mail message
containing "help" on a line by itself to [e-mail] for instructions
on how to use the mail server.

All of the groups can be posted to by electronic mail, though, by using a
gateway at the University of Texas at Austin. To post a message this way,
change the name of the group you wish to post to by replacing all of the '.'s
with '-'s - for example, rec.radio.swap becomes rec-radio-swap - and send to
that [e-mail] ([e-mail], for example). You may
crosspost by including multiple addresses as Cc: entries (but see below). This
gateway's continued availability is at the pleasure of the admins at
UT-Austin, and is subject to going away at any time - and especially if
forgeries and other net.abuses become a problem. You have been warned.

Mailing Lists
=============

In addition to the mailing lists that mirror the Usenet newsgroups, there
also are a few that stand alone. These cover specific areas of ham radio,
and discussion is focused on just those areas.

The cq-contest mailing list is for discussions of contesting in ham radio.
To join, send email with the word "subscribe" on a line by itself to
[e-mail].

The DX mailing list covers the finer points of DXing. This one is also
joined by mailing "subscribe" on a line by itself, this time to
[e-mail].

There's also a VHF mailing list, for VHF operators of the weak signal
persuasion. You can join this one be sending "subscribe vhf" on a line by
itself to [e-mail].

All of the following mailing lists are sponsored to the Boston Amateur Radio
Club, as well as some others of local interest. Thanks to N1IST for the
information.

qrp-l:  This is the qrp mailing list, previously maintained by Bruce
        Walker at Think.com.  It is for discussions about the design,
        construction, and use of qrp (low power) radios and related
        equipment.
arrl-ve-list: This is a one-way list, run by Bart Jahnke of the ARRL
        VEC, for announcements to VEs and VE teams.
w1aw-list:     ARRL bulletins, news, and information
newsline-list: Redistribution of Amateur Radio Newsline
letter-list:   Redistribution of the ARRL Letter
fox-list:      Fox hunting and Radio Direction Finding
fieldorg-l:    ARRL field organization discussions
ham-tech:      Technical discussions and questions about Amateur Radio
arrl-exam-list: amateur radio license examinations scheduled in the US and
                in some foreign areas.

To sign up or inquire about these lists, send mail to [e-mail]
with the following in the body (subject is ignored) of the message.
<listname> is the name of the list to subscribe to.
  To subscribe:   subscribe <listname>
  To unsubscribe: unsubscribe <listname>
  For more information: help
  To post (to the two-way lists), send your message to <listname>@netcom.com

Please do NOT send subscription requests to the mailing lists themselves;
that doesn't work very often, and is very annoying to those on the list.
Also, please keep your electronic mail address current with any mailing
lists you subscribe to, as dealing with returned email is a nuisance for the
person maintaining the mailing list.

A Few Words on Crossposting
===========================

Please do not crosspost messages to two or more groups unless there is genuine
interest in both groups in the topic being discussed, and when you do, please
include a header line of the form "Followup-To: group.name" in your article's
headers (before the first blank line). This will cause followups to your
article to go to the group listed in the Followup-To: line. If you wish
to have replies to go to you by email, rather than be posted, use the word
"poster" instead of the name of a group. Such a line appears in the headers
of this article.

One of the few examples of productive cross-posting is with the rec.radio.info
newsgroup. To provide a filtered presentation of information articles, while
still maintaining visibility in their home newsgroups, the moderator strongly
encourages cross-posting. All information articles should be submitted to the
rec.radio.info moderator so that he may simultaneously cross-post your
information to the appropriate newsgroups. Most newsreaders will only present
the article once, and network bandwidth is conserved since only one article is
propagated. If you make regular informational postings, and have made
arrangements with the moderator to post directly to the group, please
cross-post as appropriate.

--
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
[e-mail]   | adequately be explained by stupidity.
      "All is strange and vague." "Are we dead?" "Or is this Ohio?"
                      -- Yakko and Dot Warner


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Rick Meuse )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Mirage B3016 2 meter 160 watts
Date: 16 Sep 1995 07:49:55 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <43dvj3$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bos5-13.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 16 12:49:55 AM PDT 1995

I have a 2 meter 160 watt allmode amp for sale.Covers 144-148 and 30
watts in gives you 160 watts out.Asking $150 plus shipping.
Contact Rick at [phone]....



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!felix.TECLink.net!usenet
From: Thomas Martin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco
Date: 16 Sep 1995 10:32:05 GMT
Organization: Martin Enterprises
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43e935$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc1_23.teclink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

Does anyone know how to get in touch with Alinco's tech support
on the internet? I don't think they have a WWW site but do have
an email address.




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (James Brannigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Omni VI Software ??
Date: 16 Sep 1995 10:43:24 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 10
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43e9oc$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Can anyone recommend DOS or Windows based software to control the TEN-TEC
Omni VI?
I would also like to hear from other owners about filter preferences, etc.

I'm still within the 30 day return window while I like the radio a lot,
maybe there are "features" I hav'nt found yet......

Thanks for reading
73, Jim WB2TPS



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!budapest.ozonline.com.au!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Adam Maurer)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom IC-575A for sale
Date: 16 Sep 1995 12:20:07 GMT
Organization: The Shack
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <43efdn$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.12.227.89
Mime-Version: 1.0
Summary: IC-575A for sale
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.3

Hi!

I have an Icom IC-575A for sale.

Covers 26-55MHz continuous TX & RX.   Has 100mems, DDS, PBT, inbuilt
mains supply.   Is in E.C.  Comes with original packaging, accessories
and service manual.

AUD$1500.00

Must sell to fund other ham purchases.

73 Adam VK3ALM    (also via packet  VK3ALM@VK3KSD)




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!swidir.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!world-net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Dany Jean-Marie)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Skymaster software
Date: 16 Sep 1995 14:09:44 GMT
Organization: world-net.sct.fr
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43elr8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: client66.sct.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.3

Does anybody know where to find a software called skymaster and
made by PC Lowe.
It is used to receive ACARS transmission
Thanks



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!server2.ols.net!usenet
From: Andy Brinkley <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile UHF Duplexer Recommend
Date: 16 Sep 1995 14:16:19 GMT
Organization: Online South Incorporated
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <43em7j$[e-mail]>
References: <43cthj$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.27.2.58
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 16bit)
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (William Rahl) wrote:
>Can someone recommend by manufacturer, a mobile duplexer
> for the uhf band. and how and what equipment is needed to "tune"
> them?
>                                             Any help appreciated
>                                                                   Bill
>
>   [e-mail]
>


Bill - I hope the following will help :

1. There are probably a dozen different brands of UHF duplexers
   available. My experience has been that you basically get what you pay
   for.

2. The primary type of duplexer that is used for mobile service is the
   "Notch/Band -Reject" type due to its small size and relativlty good
   isolation between the transmitter and the reciever.

3. Numerous books and magazine articles have been written about tuning
   duplexers, and somewhere I have a copy of one that is very good
   written by a fellow out in Arizona (I think).  When I find it I will
   send you the name and where you can get a copy.  This particluar book
   is very staright forward on how to tune the various types of
   duplexers.


4. If you are interested, I have some Motorola Model TFE-6030 UHF
   mobile duplexers that were removed from service on mobile phones.
   They have 4 cavities and are rated for 20 watts continous duty.  The
   price is $50.00 each and this includes detailed instructions on how to
   tune the duplexer using a signal generator, receiver, wattmeter and
   UHF portable.  Or for $30.00 extra, I'll tune the duplexer to your
   frequency.

5. Just out of curiosity, what are you going to set up that is mobile
   duplex?

If I can be of any further help, e-mail me at [e-mail]


TNX  Andy  N4ROX




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!murphy.servtech.com!news
From: [e-mail] (Robert Strickland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RF output on TS-440S?
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:15:05 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: ServiceTech, Inc.
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <43f47q$[e-mail]>
References: <430kao$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: regcon.syr.servtech.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.38

[e-mail] (Max Sabo) wrote:

 Is it possible to turn down the RF output to do something in the
>range of QRP, or is it always at 100watts output?

Yes. Look at the upper left knob set. The chrome/silver, outter knob
is labeled "CAR." This controls the drive/power out. If you switch the
meter switch to PWR, you can watch the pwr out go up and down as you
adjust the CAR knob. Make sure that you don't increase the carrier out
to the point of overloading the ALC capability in the unit. You check
this by putting the meter switch in the ALC position. If I want max
power out, I adjust the CAR knob to just below the point where the ALC
circuit starts to kick. If you then check the PWR setting, you'll see
it's about 100 watts. For lower levels, the ALC is not operative. So,
put the meter on PWR and adjust to the level you want. Remember, the
meter is approximate, not dead accurate. Hope this helps.

...Robert


Robert G. Strickland  KE2WY
[e-mail]
Syracuse, New York



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: atlas radio
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 18:32:14 -0500
Organization: Delphi ([e-mail] email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <434l8m$ngp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1b.delphi.com
X-To: ruediger schmidt <[e-mail]>

at the recent southwestern division arrl convention in long beach, california,
i visited the atlas booth (stand) and was told the the owner had been ill
but now okay (recovered) and the radio would be produced soon.    BUT

why would aanyone buy this transceiver. the technology is ten years our of date
(obsolete).  i simply do not understand why anyone would favor this radio
over the several modern technology transceivers.   what (if anything am i
missing?    Marvin W2AH/6


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!cs.utk.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!phil.heaton
From: [e-mail] (Phil Heaton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RF output on TS-440S?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 16 Sep 95 18:33:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Phil Heaton)
References: <430kao$[e-mail]>
Lines: 24

-=> Quoting Max Sabo to All <=-


MS> I am kind of embarassed to ask this question, but I own a TS-440S and
MS> I  have never figured out how to turn down the RF output going to the
MS> antenna.  There is an AF knob, which is the volume, and then there is
MS> an  RF knob, which seems to only attenuate the RF coming into the set
MS> on  recieve.  Is it possible to turn down the RF output to do something
MS> in the  range of QRP, or is it always at 100watts output?

MS> Any help will be appreciated.


Look for a "carrier" knob, go to CW mode, set it to your
heart's content.

Phil, KE4KRT

___ Blue Wave/OS/2 v2.20

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA
Phone: [phone]             Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Chris Boone <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RC-1000 Repeater Controller???
Date: 16 Sep 1995 20:59:15 GMT
Organization: GSU/ENTERGY
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <43fdr3$l6c$[e-mail]>
References: <439hqp$[e-mail]>

My opinion is IF you want the best for yuor money, get a CAT
controller or a LinkCom...the RC1000 is not much more than a
small PCB controller...somewhat limited and overpriced
considering what the others cost

Chris
WB5ITT

--

Chris Boone WB5ITT                     Compuserve 72732,2610
PO Box 3102                            FIDO 1:106/4267
Conroe, Texas 77305-3102               Sysop WBBS @ 409-447-4267


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Chris Boone <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: repeater controller search for info
Date: 16 Sep 1995 21:00:56 GMT
Organization: GSU/ENTERGY
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43fdu8$l6c$[e-mail]>
References: <432234$[e-mail]>

Buy either a LINKCOM RLC 2,4 or 5 model or look at the CAT
300,500 or 1000 series...

Or I have a RC850 used for sale...
V3.8 software

73
Chris

--

Chris Boone WB5ITT                     Compuserve 72732,2610
PO Box 3102                            FIDO 1:106/4267
Conroe, Texas 77305-3102               Sysop WBBS @ 409-447-4267


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!nntp.msstate.edu!dab2
From: [e-mail] (David A. Boackle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need: ICOM 2000H TX Mod
Date: 16 Sep 1995 21:03:53 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43fe3p$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: isis.msstate.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


Hello,
I am looking for extended TX/RX mod for the ICOM 2000H.
I have checked Oakland database with no luck :(

Thanks for your time. :)

73 de KC5AAW
---
David A. Boackle    [e-mail]    Mississippi State University


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!news.dfw.net!news.dfw.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Lewis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Doppler RDF gear for sale
Date: 16 Sep 1995 21:11:54 -0500
Organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43g05a$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dfw.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Doppler RDF gear for sale!

        The AB5CK Doppler is now available is many forms.

        From fully assembled and calibrated units to PC boards.

        Parts for boards are also available.

        If you are interested in more information on the AB5CK Doppler,
        please inquire to my E-Mail address for pricing and various
        options.

73!
Tom Lewis
AB5CK Dopplers
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!oleane!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!fox.iprolink.ch!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Julien Auberson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: CB prices in the USA
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 21:54:24 GMT
Organization: Internet ProLink
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <43fgs5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: portla23.iprolink.ch
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55

Hello, i'm going to buy a new CB or vht transmitter,my father go in
the usa next mounth,i just want to have an idea about american prices
give some firsts prices or cs shops www adresses.

Thank You


Julien



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:41 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!tcsi.tcs.com!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.scruz.net!cruzio!pine222
From: [e-mail] (David Wells)
Subject: Re: Raynav 750 Loran info?
Organization: cruzio
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 22:24:01 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: pine222.cruzio.com
References: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (The News UID)
Lines: 20

[e-mail] (Rex Allers) wrote:
>
>I bought a Raynav 750 Loran C navigation unit at a flea market.  I'm not a
>pilot or a sailor, but by trial and error I was able to get it configured to
>find a master and two slave stations, and it gives me Longitude and Latitude.
>Unfortunately it seems to be off about 8 - 10 miles.  I don't know if it needs
>calibrated or if I just haven't fed it all needed parameters. It has numerous
>settngs and modes. I deduced some of it but most is unknown.
>
>I'd like to use it to ease grid square determination for microwave contests.
>
>Does anybody know how I can get operator or service documentation on this
>thing? Its made by Raytheon, looks to be about late-70's or early-80's vintage.
>
>
Raytheon Marine is alive and well and living in Manchester, N.H. I do not have their number with me now but they have an
800 number you could get from information. If you cannot get it, e-mail me and I will locate it for you.

73 de Dave KD6TO [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!csulb.edu!drivel.ics.uci.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Clark Savage Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RF output on TS-440S?
Date: 16 Sep 1995 22:59:06 -0700
Organization: UC Irvine Department of ICS
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <43gdfa$[e-mail]>
References: <430kao$[e-mail]> <43f47q$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: safety.ics.uci.edu

In <43f47q$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Robert Strickland) writes:

>[e-mail] (Max Sabo) wrote:

> Is it possible to turn down the RF output to do something in the
>>range of QRP, or is it always at 100watts output?

>Yes. Look at the upper left knob set. The chrome/silver, outter knob
>is labeled "CAR." This controls the drive/power out. If you switch the

Good advice, but it only works for CW.  For SSB the carrier control does
not cut the power down.  You can adjust the mike gain but it is pretty
tempermental.  The suggestion of a 9 volt battery used to provide ALC
seems to me to be the simplest and easiest way to control power out
in both modes.

Clark
WA3JPG


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!skypoint.com!news
From: Neil Gjere <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WANTED: Breakdown of Keypad Functions for HTX-404 HT
Date: 16 Sep 1995 23:20:18 GMT
Organization: GjereRig Inc.
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43fm3i$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-16.skypoint.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Would someone be kind enough to post information regarding the
function keys for this particular unit.

Thanks



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!xmission!xmission!crum
From: [e-mail] (crum)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: handheld, fast DTMF speed, 9600bps data port
Date: 16 Sep 1995 23:27:59 GMT
Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900)
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <43fmhv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xmission.xmission.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hi, does anyone know of any VHF/UHF HT radios besides the Alinco
DJ-580T that can send DTMF tones _really_ fast?  Thanks for any info!

The Alinco DJ-580T has an undocumented feature that allows the DTMF
sending speed to be set, over a wide range (16 different settings).
You do F-FL/PL, then # 1 2 3 to change to the next slower DTMF sending
speed.  Speed 5 is the fastest speed that can be decoded by my
Standard C5718DA radio, and that speed is too fast to dial a phone
number with.  I think I can dial phone numbers with speed 6 or 7,
though, which is faster than the default speed (which is "A", if I
remember correctly).

I ask if any other radios can send DTMF tones fast, because I lost my
Alinco HT earlier today while hiking.  Rats!  I am wondering what
model of radio to replace it with.  The DTMF sending speed is actually
a major factor to me, believe it or not.  I like to use DTMF paging,
on the wide-area 449.1 repeater hear in Salt Lake County, Utah.  It
works great!

I also wish there were a handheld transceiver that had a 9600bps
G3RUH-type packet radio port -- one that I could use without having to
modify a radio.  There are mobile radios with 9600bps data ports, so I
sure hope that a handheld comes out with this feature soon.  I tried
to modify a Radio Shack HTX-404 for data use a few times, but never
got it to work.  I need a better soldering iron, I think.  I got TX
and RX to work at different times but not together, and my poor
soldering damaged the radio a couple of times.

Best Regards!



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!news
From: [e-mail] (Andrew Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Question/Help
Date: 16 Sep 1995 23:42:11 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43fncj$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: line048.nwm.mindlink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5

I have a two meter hand held radio, It was keyed up without an antenna
for about a second.....Is there likely to have been any damage?

AJT



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!news.erinet.com!en.com!usenet
From: Scott Lawrence <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Looking for first handheld, suggestions?
Date: 16 Sep 1995 23:54:47 GMT
Organization: Exchange Network Services
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43fo47$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-24.en.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17030 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86576

I just started studing for my tech test.  I want to get a dual band
handheld.  Can anyone recommend one.  A friend of mine who just got his
license, bought a Icom IC-T21A.  It's incredibily small!!!   But its only
2 meter.

So if anyone has any suggestions, please email me..
[e-mail]

I'm just getting into this hobby, I have a million questions.  If anyone
would be willing to answer a few, I greatly appreciate it!

Thanks
    Scott



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Gary J Biniak )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:  Astra Corp High Current DC Power Supply
Date: 17 Sep 1995 00:02:33 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43foip$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ara-il1-06.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 16  5:02:33 PM PDT 1995

Incrediably durable 14 volt @ 100 amp or 28 volt at 50 amp DC power
supplies.  Extremely accurate voltage and current meters.  Output
voltage is variable.

Have 2 that I bought 1 1/2 years ago and haven't had a chance to put
them to use.  Now I'm moving and can't take them with me.

Both are still boxed and ready to shipped to you.

I'll let them both go at $900 + shipping, or each for $500 + shipping.
Weight: 160 pounds each.


E-mail at [e-mail] or call 708-584-6152 (Chicago, IL)


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Gary J Biniak )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Astron Corp High Current DC power Supplies
Date: 17 Sep 1995 00:28:02 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <43fq2i$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ara-il1-06.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 16  5:28:02 PM PDT 1995

I have 2 DC power supplies:

    13.8 volts at 37 amps continuous
    $200 + shipping

    28.0 volts at 18 amps continuous
    $275 + shipping

    Or both for $425 + shipping

Both are 19 inch rack mountable.  Both have lighted current and voltage
meters.

Both have very low hours and are in excellent condition.  I have them
packed in original cartons and ready to ship.

E-mail at [e-mail] or call 708-584-6152 (Chicago, IL)


I have 2 DC power supplies:

    13.8 volts at 37 amps continuous
    $200 + shipping

    28.0 volts at 18 amps continuous
    $275 + shipping

    Or both for $425 + shipping

Both are 19 inch rack mountable.  Both have lighted current and voltage
meters.

Both have very low hours and are in excellent condition.  I have them
packed in original cartons and ready to ship.

E-mail at [e-mail] or call 708-584-6152 (Chicago, IL)





From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Gary J Biniak )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS:  Astron Corp High Current DC power Supplies
Date: 17 Sep 1995 00:30:08 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43fq6g$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ara-il1-06.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 16  5:30:08 PM PDT 1995

I have 2 DC power supplies:

    13.8 volts at 37 amps continuous
    $200 + shipping

    28.0 volts at 18 amps continuous
    $275 + shipping

    Or both for $425 + shipping

Both are 19 inch rack mountable.  Both have lighted current and voltage
meters.

Both have very low hours and are in excellent condition.  I have them
packed in original cartons and ready to ship.

E-mail at [e-mail] or call 708-584-6152 (Chicago, IL)




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.interserv.net!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Equipment for sale
Date: 17 Sep 1995 01:19:45 GMT
Organization: InterServ News Service
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <43ft3h$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dd1-006.compuserve.com
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

Lots of miscellaneous  microwave equipment for sale. Everything from Scientific/Atlanta video
receivers to 11GHz microwave system. 11 GHz 10 watt HewlettPackard amplifier. All priced for quick sale.
Call for information. Jim 907-694-2686 or leave me a message at [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!parsifal.nando.net!usenet
From: DB Wilhelm <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ-422B Keyer & TS-440?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 01:22:47 GMT
Organization: News & Observer Public Access
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <43ft97$[e-mail]>
References: <43296p$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grail603.nando.net

[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>
> This is all rather Mickey Mouse, and use of a keying relay, a reed
> relay will easily keep up with your keying speed, is probably a more
> universal and better design. It doesn't care about keying voltage
> polarity, and it'll give a nice solid low. You'll wear out your key
> before you wear out the relay.
>
I have often wondered why keyer manufacturers go to great extremes
to provide all those different output connections, along with
sometimes complex instructions defining how to hook this to that.
IMHO, a cheap, fast relay would provide a universal solution.
I know of no rig that will not respond correctly to a contact
closure on the keying line.  Maybe the transistors are cheaper
than a relay, but all other things considered, the relay may be
cheaper than all the other support stuff.

What a tangled web we weave sometimes when we forget the KISS
principle.

73,
Don W3FPR



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:51 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!amdahl.com!netcomsv!uucp3.netcom.com!lafn.org!lafn.org!ag001
From: [e-mail] (Abraham Stavsky)
Subject: RS HTX-202 Warning!
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lafn.org
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: Los Angeles Free-Net
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 01:30:35 GMT
Lines: 17


Radio Shack should include this warning with the very poor instruction
book they include with their HTX-202, which I understand is mfg. for
them by Icom in Korea: never plug your 202 into the cigar lighter with
your 12-volt+ battery UNLESS you're using an external antenna
(like a mag-mount).  If you use the rubber duckie, the 5+ watts of RF
you generate feed back into the set, causing the PLL to unlock,
thereby rendering your HT useless until repaired. I've gotten so
cautious I won't even use the HT inside the car with the NiCad, because
the metal and windshield might cause same problem.

If anyone knows a way around this, or how ro reset the PLL once unlocked,
I'd be very grateful to hear from them.

KE6OCM
--
pax vobiscum


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenet
From: Paul Keezer <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HamView Products on the WWW
Date: 17 Sep 1995 01:32:56 GMT
Organization: PDK Inc.
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <43fts8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: keez.tiac.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 32bit)

Finally a WWW page has been set up for HamView products, a
Windows based Ham Radio program.  This page can now be located
at http://www.tiac.net/users/pkeezer/hamview.htm
There is an upgrade file right now for Win95, but the bug has
only been corrected in Logview 5.0  Come and check us out.

                           Paul Keezer, President of PDK Inc.






From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news
From: Gary KF9CM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RF output on TS-440S?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 01:54:49 GMT
Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicagoland Internet Services
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <43fv59$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lak003.wwa.com
X-Newsreader: AIR News 3.X (SPRY, Inc.)

AS AN OPERATOR OF THE KENWOOD TS440S HF TRANSCEIVER, I HAVE FOUND
THAT CONTROL OF THE SSB POWER FROM THE FRONT PANEL WOULD
SIMPLIFY THE OPERATION OF THE TRANSCEIVER. THEREFORE, I HAVE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED A MODIFICATION ON MY RIG
AND WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THIS IMPROVEMENT WITH OTHER OWNERS OF
THIS PIECE OF GEAR.  ON THE FOLLOWING IS A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF
THAT MODIFICATION.

       KENWOOD TS-440S  SSB CONTROL
       WITH THE FRONT PANEL CARRIER CONTROL KNOB

       THE KENWOOD TS440S HF TRANSCEIVER IS PROBABLY ONE
       OF THE BEST ALL AROUND RIGS FOR MOBILE OR PORTABLE
       OPERATION, AS WELL AS A GREAT BASE RIG.  WHILE THE
       KENWOOD TS 440S IS A GREAT LITTLE RIG, IT DOES LACK
       A FEW OF THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THE ARE STANDARD IN
       THE OTHER RIGS.  ONE SUCH IMPROVEMENT IS CONTROL OF
       THE SSB OUTPUT FROM THE FRONT PANEL. BEFORE THIS
       MODIFICATION THE ONLY WAY TO ADJUST THE SSB OUTPUT
       WITH OUT AN EXTERNAL CIRCUIT WAS TO DISASSEMBLE
       THE BOTTOM HALF OF THE CASE AND ADJUST VR1 (ALC).

       ALTHOUGH THIS IS A VERY SIMPLE MODIFICATION IF YOU ARE
       NOT COMFORTABLE AT WORKING ON ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS DO
       NOT ATTEMPT THIS MODIFICATION.

       THIS MODIFICATION INVOLVES JUMPERING THE CATHODE OF D48
       TO THE ANODE OF D51 ON THE IF BOARD.

       1. REMOVE TOP COVER EXPOSING THE I.F. BOARD

       2. LOCATE J28. IT IS A TWO (2) PRONG PLUG VECTORED
          APPROXIMATELY 2 INCHES FROM THE BACK OF THE I.F.
          BOARD AND IN THE CENTER OF THE BOARD.  D48 IS
          LOCATED JUST TO THE RIGHT OF PLUG J28.

       3. NOW LOCATE J19. IT IS VECTORED APPROXIMATELY TWO (2)
          INCHES FROM THE FRONT AND IN THE CENTER OF THE BOARD.
          D51 IS LOCATED IN BACK OF PIN #8 COUNTING FROM THE LEFT.

       4. PREPARE A FIVE INCH PIECE OF #22 HOOKUP WIRE BY STRIPPING
          AND TINNING THE ENDS OF THE WIRE APPROXIMATELY ONE FORTH
          OF AN INCH ON ONE END, ONE EIGHT OF INCH ON THE OTHER.

       5. CAREFULLY APPLY SOLDER TO THE TOP OF D51.

       6. CAREFULLY SOLDER THE ONE EIGHTH INCH END OF THE PREPARED
          WIRE TO TOP OF D51.

       7. GENTLY FORCE THE OTHER END OF THE WIRE INTO THE TOP OF
          PIN #1 OF J28. PIN #1 IS THE ONE ON THE LEFT OF THE PLUG.

       8. REASSEMBLE THE COVER.

       WITH THIS MODIFICATION YOU CAN SOLDER THE WIRE TO THE FOILS
       ON THE BOTTOM OF THE I.F. BOARD, BUT IT REQUIRES UNPLUGING
       ALLOT OF PLUGS FROM THE I.F. BOARD.

       WARNING: ALTHOUGH THE SWR PROTECTION CIRCUIT IS STILL IN
       PLACE, THIS MODIFICATION CAN PRODUCE POWER OUTPUTS THAT CAN
       EXCEED 180 WATTS AND DAMAGE THE FINAL TRANSISTORS SO BE
CAREFUL!



                                          "73"  FROM KF9CM
                                           GARY L. GILES
                                           [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Lord GAD <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu Mil Spec Dual Band Mobile?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 01:58:51 GMT
Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736)
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <43fvcr$ge5$[e-mail]>

Does anyone know if Yaesu is going to release a Dual-band mobile
rig that will be mil-spec? I love the 2500, but want a dual
bander. Am looking at the Kenwood 733, but really want mil-spec.

Thanks

--
His Eminence, Lord GAD


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Escusa Me)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Date: 17 Sep 1995 02:35:31 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Lines: 7
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.cs.utexas.edu

The charter of this group states that it's a forum for discussing issues relating to Amateur Radio (Ham) equipment.  It is specifically NOT intendd as a p

The proper place for all such ads is Rec.Radio.Swap.

If you insist on placing ads in this group, be prepared for e-mail from many readers intent on making you aware of your error.

thanks.


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (BUDDY10)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Has anybody used EasyLog 4 ?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 06:02:40 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 4
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43gro0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

Has anyone here used easylog 4 ?    What do you think of it ?
Thanks ,
Scott Powell
KD6GPV


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (James Dean)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-212 read before buying
Date: 17 Sep 1995 06:17:29 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 19
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43gehp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap5.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

I just bought an HTX-212 from Radio Shack, and found out afterwards that
you cannot store out of band freq's in memory for monitoring.  As part of
my job, I need to monitor local public safety frequencies, and though
this would do it, but it won't.  The only way to monitor non-ham
frequencies is to punch one into the vfo, then listen until you want to
change.  I wrote R/S and got a letter back from a non tech person saying
that this was a trade off because allowing the storing of out of band
frequencies in memory would have reduced the # of memory channels to
eight.  Wonder how Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu, etc, have managed to do this yet
R/S can't.  She also says that this was due to the limited number of bibs
of memory available.  Unfortunately, no one I know has ever heard of a
bib of memory.  I know it's an accidental error, but it's still kind of
funny what some companies expect the public to swallow.

-
  JAMES DEAN KD4USF  [e-mail]
  Yes that's really my name.
  Email to [e-mail]    It's cheaper-Thanks



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.algonet.se!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bengt Karlsson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: P-173
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 13:28:38 GMT
Organization: AlgoNet Public Access Node, Stockholm
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <43h492$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sophocles.algonet.se
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

I have a question for a friend of mine, he has bought a russian
surplus transiver in Estonia,Tallin, and he knows nothing about it.

It has belonged to some kind of military vehicle and has the
partnumber "P-173".

Power, freq ??




From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!bbs.mhv.net!Thomas.Randall
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 13:29:35 GMT
Organization: MHVNet, the Mid Hudson Valley's Internet connection
Lines: 26
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43h7rv$[e-mail]>
References: <42lsse$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: csbh.mhv.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Drew Durigan ([e-mail]) wrote:
: What great timing!  I just passed my tests this past weekend and should
: be getting my Tech-Plus ticket soon.  My 2510's all ready to go on 10-
: meters (finally get to use that radio for it's "intended" purpose :-),
: but I need to get me a good, inexpensive 2-meter rig to get started with.


: I understand Radio Shack has put the HTX-202 on sale for $199 this month.
:  Is this a good radio or another one of those famous "Rat Scrap Lemons?"
: Is it worth $199, or would I do better elsewhere?

: Comments?


: -Drew in Charlotte-



  Drew,
   Get the 202, it's a nice rig. I also recommend spending the extra
money on the maintanence plan just in case you drop her off a cliff or
off the table. I've had mine since October of last year and not one
problem so far. Sturdy radio by the way!

Tom - KB2SMS



From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:54:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!bbs.mhv.net!Thomas.Randall
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-202 strange problem
Date: 17 Sep 1995 13:36:13 GMT
Organization: MHVNet, the Mid Hudson Valley's Internet connection
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <43h88d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: csbh.mhv.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


  I was in Radio shack yesterday and a fellow ham brought in his 202 with
a wierd problem. The signal strength meter was constantly reading a full
recieve signal on all freqs. even though no one was on the air. We tried
resetting the radio with no luck. He had them send it in for repair.
Anyone else have this trouble? We couldn't figure out the problem. I was
hopeing to figure it out for the guy but no luck.
By the way, the radio still worked o.k. dispite this occurance.


Tom


From [e-mail] Sun Sep 17 11:55:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (MRI)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-212 read before buying
Date: 17 Sep 1995 15:22:22 GMT
Organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc., Ellicott City, MD USA
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43hefe$[e-mail]>
References: <43gehp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clark.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]

James Dean ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I just bought an HTX-212 from Radio Shack, and found out afterwards that
: you cannot store out of band freq's in memory for monitoring.  As part of
              --- snip --
: eight.  Wonder how Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu, etc, have managed to do this yet
: R/S can't.  She also says that this was due to the limited number of bibs
: of memory available.  Unfortunately, no one I know has ever heard of a
: bib of memory.  I know it's an accidental error, but it's still kind of
: funny what some companies expect the public to swallow.
:
: -
:   JAMES DEAN KD4USF  [e-mail]
:   Yes that's really my name.
:   Email to [e-mail]    It's cheaper-Thanks
:
My guess is that was a typo for 'bits' of memory

Elvis


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!col.hp.com!simtel!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!cass.ma02.bull.com!shell.portal.COM!anonymous-remailer
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ___This Group Is NOT For Sales or Purchases___
Date: 16 Sep 1995 20:32:53 -0000
Organization: Bull Worldwide Information Systems.
Lines: 7
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

The charter of this group states that it is for discussion of equipment-related issues.  It is not the place to post equipment for sale or wanted to buy.

All ads should be posted to Rec.Radio.Swap.

If you insist on doing otherwise, be prepared for e-mail from many readers advising you of your error.

Thankyou.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!col.hp.com!simtel!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!cass.ma02.bull.com!neural.helix.COM!random
From: [e-mail] (Escusa Me)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: *  This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases  *
Date: 17 Sep 1995 07:17:36 -0000
Organization: Bull Worldwide Information Systems.
Lines: 8
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: <[e-mail]>


The charter of this group states that it's a forum for discussion of issues related to Amateur Radio (Ham) equipment.  It is NOT the place to post equipme

The proper place for all such ads is Rec.Radio.Swap.

If you insist on placing ads in this group, be prepared for e-mail from numerous readers intent on pointing out your error.

Thanks.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (SlowalkJR)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT 51R -Mods
Date: 17 Sep 1995 14:41:33 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 4
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43hq4t$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (SlowalkJR)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I just purchased my first HT. I'm looking for information reguarding
modifying the Yaesu FT51R to expand it's TX range. Thanks. Please send
replys to SlowalkJR.
James, KF4AQO


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newshost.marcam.com!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!cello.gina.calstate.edu!swrl31.gina.slip.csu.net!rhought
From: Robert D Houghton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: atlas radio
Date: 17 Sep 1995 15:19:20 GMT
Organization: Physics teacher/Science Chairman
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43he9o$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.150.1.31
X-UserAgent: 1.1
X-XXMessage-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-XXDate: Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:24:28 GMT

The folks at the Atlas booth told me that the radio was being redesigned
with surface mount technology (if that's good!) so perhaps the design
won't be so out of date. I'm not a foaming-at-the-mouth nationalist, but
it *would* be nice to see another US produced piece of amateur equipment.
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|
|                              |  AMSAT member #26148                    |
| Robert D. Houghton           |  digital satellites: KC6LVG@PACSAT      |
| Science Department Chairman  |  Packet radio: kc6lvg@k6unq.#cas.na     |
| John A. Rowland High School  |  Other internet:                        |
| Rowland Heights, CA 91748    |    [e-mail]                     |
|                              |    [e-mail]    |
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!panix!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!isclient.merit.edu!voyager.net!vixa!moniter
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2 meter /w some extras
Date: 17 Sep 1995 15:55:40 GMT
Organization: Voyager Information Networks, Inc.
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43hgds$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vixa.voyager.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]



--
I am soon to upgrade my license to Technician No-code so that I can use
that 2 meter band. I am also a member of the local Civil Air Patrol and
our Wing (State-wide) Communications Network frequency is just over 2
meter (148.150) and I was wondering if there were radios available that
would allow that extra step. If so, how much would one cost.

I know that there are antennas that will go there and I know where to get
one. I just need to find the radio.

Note - I am not looking to buy one now. My new classes will start in
January and end in June. I might buy a radio after I get my new license.

 Cadet Nathan A. Harmon
  Civil Air Patrol, Monroe Composite Squadron
 [e-mail] > Moniter at Voyager Information Networks
 http://www.voyager.net   Telnet: voyager.net


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Escusa Me)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Date: 17 Sep 1995 16:51:12 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Lines: 12
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.cs.utexas.edu

   [e-mail] (Jim Lowman) wrote:

>Some folks (no flame intended) really get offended about the ads, but I don't
>consider them any more of a breach of netiquette or the charter than . . .

The following is excerpted from the charter:

"The swap group is rec.radio.swap. ... If you have radio equipment, or test gear, or computer stuff that hams would be interested in, here's the place. Eq

.. The .equipment group is not the place for buying or selling equipment; that's what rec.radio.swap is for."

Just wanted to clear that up.  ;)


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.databank.com!quadrant6.execnet.com!usenet
From: Jeff Miller <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom Z1A Mods?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 16:53:35 GMT
Organization: DataWeb
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43hjqf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip107.aquila.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 32bit)

I'm looking for any modifications to the New Icom Z1A Dual Band HT.
I am very pleased with the radio, but I am not able to monitor 800mhz
with it.  I know there is a hardware modification to do this through
sources at Icom, but have not been able to get my eye on the info.

Thank you for any help you might have.

Jeff
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Da Baz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) vs. Yaesu FT-51R (HP)
Date: 17 Sep 1995 16:58:54 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 9
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43i26e$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Da Baz)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Dear fellow Hams,

   I am considering buying a dual-band HT and I have narrowed my choices
down to the Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) and the Yaesu FT-51R (HP, 5 watt
version).  I would appreciate anything you have to say about these two
radios that might aid me in my decison.  Thanks for your time.

Sincerely,
                  Basil "Baz" Gravanis, w/ WA2EIU


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Daniel Jerome <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TH79A Mods
Date: 17 Sep 1995 18:56:10 GMT
Organization: SIEMENS Automotive
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43hr0a$qvu$[e-mail]>

I recently purchased a Kenwood TH79A dual band HT.  I would like
infromation on the MARS/CAP frequency modification, and any other
mods people have found useful.  Any help will be appreciated.

Daniel Jerome
CServe 102767,3103


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!tivoli.tivoli.com!wichita!kilgore
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Kilgore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood Communications Announces TS-870S
Date: 17 Sep 1995 19:31:51 GMT
Organization: Tivoli Systems, Inc. - Austin, TX
Lines: 29
Sender: kilgore@wichita (Jeff Kilgore)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43ht37$[e-mail]>
References: <43d9mt$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wichita.tivoli.com

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (David A. Kay) writes:
|> In article <43d9mt$[e-mail]>, "Robert A. Kile"
|> <[e-mail]> wrote:
|>
|> > Introducing the remarkable new TS-870S HF All-Mode Transceiver with Next
|> > Generation IF-Stage DSP. The Intelligent Digitally Enhanced
|> > Communications System...
|> >
|> > http://www.accessnv.com/kenwood/
|> >
|> >
|> > de Webmaster KG7D
|>
|>
|>
|>
|>
|>
|>      Great!    What is the street price and has anybody been able to play
|> with one yet?  Did it retain all the great receive qualities of the 850?
|>
|>                                                 Dave,  AB7FV

I checked with Texas Towers the other day; they're selling them for
$2600. I'm not planning on replacing my 850 immediately, but
after the 870 has been out there long enough to see how it stacks up, I
might be tempted.

Jeff, KC1MK


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:58 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 19:41:41 GMT
Lines: 34
Sender: [e-mail]

Escusa Me ([e-mail]) wrote:
: The charter of this group states that it's a forum for discussing issues relating to Amateur Radio (Ham) equipment.  It is specifically NOT intendd as a

: The proper place for all such ads is Rec.Radio.Swap.

: If you insist on placing ads in this group, be prepared for e-mail from many readers intent on making you aware of your error.

Maybe it's time to do one of two things:

1)  Change the name of rec.radio.swap to rec.radio.forsale, which is more in
    conformance with the naming conventions that are widespead over the
    'Net.

2)  Leave rec.radio.swap as a global swapmeet, and create the new group
    rec.radio.forsale.

Neither approach is 100% reliable, however.  There will always be spammers
and clueless newbies.

So, what does everyone think of this proposal?

On a personal note, I don't mind that much if ads are posted here, as long
as they are *strictly* related to amateur radio.  Some folks (no flame
intended) really get offended about the ads, but I don't consider them any
more of a breach of netiquette or the charter than I consider driving 70 mph
on the freeway to be a major breach of the law.  Often, this is the first
place that I hear of a new product or a new version of a CD-ROM.

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:44:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (BUDDY10)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2 m ht help please
Date: 17 Sep 1995 20:27:46 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 11
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43iee2$[e-mail]>
References: <43i511$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

What kind of line of sight range COULD  you expect ?  Also, at full power
how far away could you expect to RELIABLY hit a repeater in an urban
environment ?

Thanks ,

Scott Powell
KD6GPV
General since 1995 !

P.S. I was going to get one of these for my wife.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (KE4IOF)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Date: 17 Sep 1995 21:41:41 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 14
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43iiol$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (Richard Anderson) writes:

>I think (someone told me about this ) that their is a 10meter to
>6meter converter... Their is a kit that you can get that U build
>that will convert 10 to 6... look in some of the ham magines (SP)
>(wont plug just one, their tooo many and dont want to offend)
>
>
Ten-Tec has/had an Xmeter (replace X with your favorite band) to 6m
tranverter for around $95.00. Don't know if it's still available.


Mark


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (James Dickson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2 m ht help please
Date: 17 Sep 1995 21:47:13 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 4
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43i511$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

I am thinking of  buying on of those 2 meter radios that radio shack has
on sale for 199 what kind of range can i expect out of these handheld
would this be a good one for a beginner



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PeterJS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen a Kenwood TS-870-S? $?
Date: 17 Sep 1995 23:13:19 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 15
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43io4f$[e-mail]>
References: <43iieq$hjr$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (PeterJS)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I saw the real think at HRO in Sunnyvale, CA on Saturday and I think that
you got the price about right.   As you say on the WWW, it is definitely
"cool".  I currently own a 3 month old TS-450S and was scheming on the
way out how I might trade up to a TS-870 before my good sense (and
checkbook) got the better of me!  Being a TS-450S owner, I'm blown away by
the larger packaging of the rig and the usability of the displays.  It
also has on-board DSP and an electronic keyer.  Finally, it comes with
a Windows program that allows you to put a customized picture of the front
panel of the rig on your PC screen and point/click to run the rig.

Very nice ... but I'm in the market to buy a linear amplifier so until
then,
I'll just wait ...

Peter


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!usenet
From: Edward Weigel <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: icom W21AT for sale
Date: 17 Sep 1995 23:41:16 GMT
Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access [phone]
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43ibms$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx07-07.teleport.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)

I have an Icom EC-W21AT rig for sale. It is a 2 meter/440 rig.
can receive both simultaneously and work crossband. Nothing wrong
with it. Not a scratch on it and includes 4 rechargeable
batteries and charger. $250   call Ed Weigel at 503-235-6229 in
Portland, Or. price is firm



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!van-bc!fonorola!news.magi.com!newsadm
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: battery cover plate for HTX-202
Date: 18 Sep 1995 00:27:16 GMT
Organization: IBM OS/2 Warp IAK
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43ied4$[e-mail]>
References: <41nnas$[e-mail]> <41p0ga$[e-mail]> <428pq4$[e-mail]> <42a5p8$[e-mail]> <42lcug$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Chris Mallam)
NNTP-Posting-Host: magi03p08.magi.com
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.03

In <42lcug$[e-mail]>, jim <[e-mail]> writes:
>Hi, I'm the tech who fixes the HTX202s when they do break...
>
>There is no reason to take the battery off an HTX202 when operating
>from a DC power source into the jack on top (by the ant. jack)  The
>radio will draw power from the source with the higher voltage.

i was in the habit of taking the battery pack off when operating with external DC,
because i measured whatever voltage was going in the top, coming out the bottom.
Is there a diode in the nicad battery to prevent overcharging the battery with external
DC going in the top?
-------------------------------------------------
[e-mail]
Chris Mallam, B.A., VA3CME
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
OS/2: Drag me, drop me, make me feel like an object!
http://infoweb.magi.com/~cmallam/INDEX.HTML
BBS: 613.241.9750



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.aurora.net!pagesat.net!a3bsrv.nai.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] ( )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Request help on old amatuer radio
Date: 18 Sep 1995 00:34:13 GMT
Organization: North American Internet Company
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <43ieq5$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: naidp8.nai.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says:
>
> Respectfully seeking info on an old '41 Hallicrafter Sky Champion
>that I just purchased today. While I originally went to get an old
>Emerson radio, this was thrown in with the deal. Good shape. Looks
>


This unit was made 1939-45, cost $49.00.  Depending on condition worth
between $60 to 120.  Strictly collector item, is not real usable in
today's environment.

Kurt Keller


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!homer.alpha.net!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2 m ht help please
Date: 18 Sep 1995 01:37:53 GMT
Organization: Alpha.net -- Milwaukee, WI
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43iihh$[e-mail]>
References: <43i511$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: juno.execpc.com
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09

In <43i511$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (James Dickson) writes:
>I am thinking of  buying on of those 2 meter radios that radio shack has
>on sale for 199 what kind of range can i expect out of these handheld
>would this be a good one for a beginner
Yes it would.  It's not too complicated and not being broadband it has good
intermod resistance which is nice in the city.  Be sure to get the extended
maintenance coverage, they will fix it even if you drop it out a window.
It should make repeaters up to 15 miles or so away.  If you are on a hill
top the range is much greater.  They are like Craftsman tools, the quality
may not be the world's best but the price is right and you can't beat the
warrenty.
I'm not prejudiced because I don't own one.  I have an Alinco.
I just think they are a good deal.


[e-mail]  N9ZSV   414 355 8147



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:06 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!iglou!n4lq
From: [e-mail] (Steve Ellington)
Subject: Re: Kenwood Communications Announces TS-870S
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <43d9mt$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 01:46:03 GMT
Lines: 4

Anybody got a price on this rig yet?
--
  Steve
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (James Dean)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2 m ht help please
Date: 18 Sep 1995 04:00:27 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 7
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43iqsr$[e-mail]>
References: <43i511$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap5.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Nice radio at a good price, and not so complicated that a beginner will
have trouble with all the bells and whistles.  It's built good too.
-
  JAMES DEAN KD4USF  [e-mail]
  Yes that's really my name.
  Email to [e-mail]    It's cheaper-Thanks



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wyoming.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Don Breazile)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: wanted 2 meter mobile
Date: 18 Sep 1995 04:01:53 GMT
Organization: wyoming.com LLC
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <43iqvh$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cys-cap-7.wyoming.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

I am looking for a vhf radio. let me know what you have
thanks and 73 Don



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!well!miwok!news.wco.com!km6xu
From: [e-mail] (Mark Walsh)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RC-1000 Repeater Controller???
Date: 18 Sep 1995 04:36:37 GMT
Organization: WCO - West Coast Online  1.800.WCO.INTERNET
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <43it0l$[e-mail]>
References: <439hqp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wco.wco.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL0]

Bruce Tenison ([e-mail]) wrote:

: At this point, we don't have a lot of money to spend on a controller, but
: have been looking at a controller marketed by Micro Computer Concepts in
: New Port Richey, Florida.  It's called the RC-1000.

I bought an RC-1000 almost a year ago.  It was clumsy to
set up, and other than crashing its software twice and
having to reset the thing twice in the process, it has
worked flawlessly since then.  It has very few bells and
whistles, and that is probably good for a first timer.
One feature that I really like is that a user can enter a
code which takes it out of PL until 30 seconds of no
activity.  Neat.

If I were doing it again though, I would by an RC-100, or
better yet, I would get a real controller like an S-Com
or a LinkCom.  This may be flame bait, but it really
ticks me off that the folks at MCC advertise this thing
as having a proper phone patch interface, but fail to
mention (until you buy the thing) that it isn't Part 68
registered.  Sure, it looks like it has been done okay,
but it's not kosher to hook it up to the phone line.
Arrrrrrgh!

Unless this is a hokey one man band of a repeater (like
mine is), spend a few extra bucks and do it right the
first time.  I will!

Cheers -- Mark
--
***** Mark Walsh ***** [e-mail] ***** km6xu@kc6pjw ***** L10861 *****


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Wanda M Desmond )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Where can I find info on PRC-9 10M FM Military radio?
Date: 18 Sep 1995 05:25:29 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <43ivs9$[e-mail]>
References: <43gdbf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-bak-ca1-22.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Sep 17 10:25:29 PM PDT 1995

In <43gdbf$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mike
Groves) writes:
>
>I picked up this great radio at a garage sale.  It's a man-pack FM
>transciever from the early 50's.  The VFO tunes from 27-39.  I plan to
>use it on the FM portion of 10M.
>
>Where can I get info about the battery requirements/pin-outs and the
>mic-speaker pinouts?  Does the US Military have archives available?
>
>Mike Groves
>[e-mail]
>
Fair Radio Sales in Lima, OH, should have a tech/users manual and
possibly the batteries and a mike for it. Phone: [phone].

John
KE6TGN


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: host [e-mail] (Your real Name)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Tentec Scout
Date: 18 Sep 1995 09:00:43 GMT
Organization: Your Organization
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43jcfr$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jlb.earthlink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14

I am thinking about buying a Tentec Scout. If you have used one would you
please E-mail your opinions to me?

Thanks,
Joe AA6WG



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!news.starnet.net!wupost!NewsWatcher!user
From: [e-mail] (Mike Musick)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mobile UHF Duplexer Recommend
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 10:01:20 -0500
Organization: STARnet, L.L.C.
Lines: 28
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <mmusick-1809951001200001@198.102.74.50>
References: <43cthj$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gatekeeper.talx.com

> Can someone recommend by manufacturer, a mobile duplexer
>  for the uhf band. and how and what equipment is needed to "tune"
>  them?

Bill -

I have just installed a Sinclabs duplexer (1.2GHz) in a repeater, and am
quite impressed by the duplexer and the company. Sinclabs is the amateur
radio division of Sinclair Radio. Phone: [phone].

They have a 440 duplexer which uses the same components as the 1.2G
duplexer, but use the cavities at 1/4-wave instead of 3/4-wave resonance.
It is roughly 12"W, 15"H, and 3"D, which are certainly dimensions which
would lend itself to easy mobile use. It's not cheap - no real duplexers
are. The 1.2G version was $540, though they do offer substantial (25%)
discounts to amateur radio clubs.

To tune duplexers correctly takes patience, knowledge - and a spectrum
analyzer/sweep generator. It's not something I'd want to consider doing in
the field, and that's provided I had ready access to an analyzer.
Duplexers usually come from they factory tuned to your application, and I,
for one, am glad they do.
  ...mm

===============================================================
Mike Musick/N0QBF            |
  [e-mail]  | [Insert usual disclaimers here.]
  [e-mail]           |


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news.alt.net!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!cornellcs!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ-422B Keyer & TS-440?
Date: 18 Sep 1995 11:52:46 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 47
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43k4ke$[e-mail]>
References: <43ft97$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43ft97$[e-mail]>, DB Wilhelm <[e-mail]>
writes:

>I have often wondered why keyer manufacturers go to great extremes
>to provide all those different output connections, along with
>sometimes complex instructions defining how to hook this to that.
>IMHO, a cheap, fast relay would provide a universal solution.
>I know of no rig that will not respond correctly to a contact
>closure on the keying line.  Maybe the transistors are cheaper
>than a relay, but all other things considered, the relay may be
>cheaper than all the other support stuff.
>
>What a tangled web we weave sometimes when we forget the KISS
>principle.
>
>73,
>Don W3FPR

Hi Don,

I'm sure the device choice is cost driven. Small reed relays cost a buck
or so, and FET's or bi-polars cost a few pennies and last longer. But
using a FET or bipolar to key a radio only seems to cause very rare
problems. The most likely cause is the 422B keyer is probably defective. I
would call the manufacturer, since they probably know a lot more about the
likely problems.

The MFJ 422 I have uses a MPSA-42 (bipolar) in the direct output. That
device has an on saturation CE voltage *maximum* of 1/2 volt. That does
not seem to be excessively high. It works flawlessly with my 751A, Yeasu
rigs, and a Kenwood 450. Just to check it out, I added a rectifier diode
in series with the keyer and it still works fine with all the rigs! Gosh,
maybe the 422 the original author has is defective and we are trying to
re-engineer something that has a bad solder joint?????

Anyway, if we really wanted to correct the problem, all lines on radios
should have established design criteria. Having a keying line that
requires being pulled below a volt or two is poor engineering. It makes
the line more subject to RFI or ground loop hum problems, and forces the
user to limit interface circuitry. It would be much better to have all
control lines designed to TTL logic low level standards.
 73 Tom

Nothing is standardized in radios, and it even varies between different
radios made by the same company. That gives me fits in my station when I
want to change from one radio to another quickly. ALC, relay outputs, mic
levels, key line voltages, and everything else all vary.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!maple.enet.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Rick Checketts)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: Ten Tec Accessory
Date: 18 Sep 1995 15:34:08 GMT
Organization: Evergreen Communications
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43k3hg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip39.enet.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.3

Sri for the earlier screw-up post. What I ment to say:
Would like to have 276 calibrator, three pin plug-in device for Ten Tec Century 21, Model 570.
Work:602-968-6241 x 474
Home:602-898-9158
Thanks & 73- Rick

Rick Checketts             [e-mail]
Technical Support Engineer Voice:1-800-426-1194 x474
Jensen Tools               Int'l/AZ:602-968-6241 x474
7815 South 46 Street       FAX:[phone]
Phoenix, AZ 85044          Int'l/AZ:602-431-9173
[e-mail], CET, ISA, SCTE, AFSMI
Opinions are my own, not that of my employer.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"-Einstien


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (BUDDY10)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Which one should I get  -  TH-79a or FT51r or Ic-Z1A ?
Date: 18 Sep 1995 19:34:34 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 9
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43kvma$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

Which of these units should I get ?   They are all about the same price.
They all have more features than you could shake a stick at.  I am STUMPED
!  I will be using it in an urban environment(Los Angeles) so Intermod
could be a problem.   Any help would be most appreciated !

Thanks,
Scott Powell
KD6GPV
General since 1995 !


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!vax.sonoma.edu!harrisok
From: [e-mail] (Ken Harrison)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS HTX-202 Warning!
Date: 18 Sep 95 19:39:54 -0800
Organization: Sonoma State University
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43gbl5$[e-mail]> <43kndr$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vax.sonoma.edu

>>The problem you describe is not a problem with the radio, but rather
>>the way it is in operation.  When attached to the 12 vdc and using a
>>rubber duck antenna, the RF from the antenna is being jammed right
> back
>>into the radio thru the unshielded 12 vdc line.
>>

> I have never had this problem with any name brand amateur HT.  Have run
> Icoms, and Yaesus direct off the battery, using the rubber duck, and
> have never had it cause a problem with the PLL.  I don't think it is a
> problem with the way the radio is operated, but rather the poor design
> and construction of the radio that would allow this condition to
> happen.
>

Ditto.  I have run Icom, Yaesu, and Kenwood directly off the 12 V. battery
with rubber duck and never had a problem such as the Radio Shack HTX-202
has.  I have to agree with the conclusion.

Ken

--

__________________________________________________________________________
Ken Harrison   ---   [e-mail]   ---   Amateur Radio:  N6MHG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!fastnet!dmarra.fast.net!user
From: [e-mail] (David M. Marra)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: How do I fix DTMF Microphone button?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 20:26:37 -0400
Organization: FASTNET(tm) PA/NJ/DE Internet
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dmarra.fast.net

Hi All--

One of the buttons on the  microphone that came with my FT-5100 mobile
radio does not function.  It is the button that switches from the Memory
to the VFO (therefore it has been heavily used!)

I took apart the microphone and cleaned behind the keypad membrane where
it makes contact with the switching circuit.  It still does not work!

Does anyone have any experience with this kind of problem?  Is it possible
that the problem might be more than just dirty contacts?  I was thinking
about gluing a very small piece of foil to the back of the button membrane
to increase conductivity...would that work???


Thanks in advance!

DAVE MARRA/n3odx
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:19 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jgardner
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Gardner)
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <432lgc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <437r1u$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 21:20:23 GMT
Lines: 25
Sender: [e-mail]

jdb ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Selling a transmitter to an UNLICENSED individual is
: simply WRONG. If a person is interested in becoming a ham
: he DOES not need a rig that will transmit. He needs nothing
: but a study guide and unless he is going for a No-Code
: tech license, a few code tapes...


Nonsense. Doing so is neither illegal nor morally wrong.

As one strictly opposed to "possession laws", I cannot find any
compelling reason to restrict ownership of any material object. Mere
possession of an object doesn't do harm. It is the use of the object
that is potentially dangerous and/or illegal.

Better not sell me a car because I might use it to break the speed limit...

I bought a 2-meter transceiver myself before I was licensed. All I did
was listen. What could possibly be wrong with this? I would have
broken the law had I transmitted, but I didn't, and no one was
harmed. Besides, having spent money for the radio gave me incentive to
keep studying for my license.
--
Jerry Gardner          | Maintainer of the Large Format Digest
[e-mail]    | Send subscription requests to [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.unicomp.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Ken Allen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: VHF Linear Amp For Sale
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 21:46:13 GMT
Organization: UniComp Technologies International Corp -- Internet Service
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43kpnf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shr13-5.prysm.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

I have a "Tempo 6N2" linear amplifier that I would like to sell.
It will handle a Kilowatt on 2-meters as well as 6-meters for
continous SSB operations. For FM it will deliver a few DB's less at
intermittent duty. The amp is in very good condition and almost looks
like a new one. I have the documentation for it.

If you are interested in purchasing this from me or if you want more
info just send me email. I have no idea what it should be worth on the
market so I am soliciting offers.

This amp is located in Shreveport, LA. It is approximately the size of
a cube which is 15" on all sides and operates either from 120vac or
220vac. It is heavy and would be difficult to pack for safe shipment.
However, I will be driving from Shreveport to Savanah, GA along U.S.
hwy-80 and I-20 in a few weeks so if anyone is near this route, it
would be very convenient to arrange delivery. My Amateur callsign is
"K5HR" and my info is correct in the Callbook.

        *KMA*
        [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TRADERS NET
Date: 18 Sep 1995 22:27:35 GMT
Organization: Real/Time Communications - Bob Gustwick and Associates
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <43kron$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: maria-4p.ip.realtime.net
X-Newsreader: AIR News 3.X (SPRY, Inc.)

Join us on 7.235 mhz, sunday mornings at 10 AM CDT for the "RADIO SWAP NET".
                                                                          Matt/KK5DR (net control)



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:22 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:13:20 GMT
Lines: 27
Sender: [e-mail]

Escusa Me ([e-mail]) wrote:

: The following is excerpted from the charter:

: "The swap group is rec.radio.swap. ... If you have radio equipment, or test gear, or computer stuff that hams would be interested in, here's the place.

: .. The .equipment group is not the place for buying or selling equipment; that's what rec.radio.swap is for."

: Just wanted to clear that up.  ;)

I did not question the content of the charter, just suggested that:

1)  ...rec.radio.swap may not be the most intuitive name for the newsgroup.
      Lots of users post without reading the charter; some just do not care
      and

2)  ...that some users, on many newsgroups, take things far too seriously.
       Posting "for sale" ads on this newsgroup is not the end of the world.

Just a thought, and I hope to hear a lot of discussion about this issue.

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!news.dfw.net!fw12.dfw.net!user
From: [e-mail] (Wayne Day)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS HTX-202 Warning!
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:44:13 -0500
Organization: The Day Organization
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fw12.dfw.net

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Abraham
Stavsky) wrote:

> Radio Shack should include this warning with the very poor instruction
> book they include with their HTX-202, which I understand is mfg. for
> them by Icom in Korea:

The HTX-202 is NOT manufactured by Icom.

> never plug your 202 into the cigar lighter with
> your 12-volt+ battery UNLESS you're using an external antenna
> (like a mag-mount).  If you use the rubber duckie, the 5+ watts of RF
> you generate feed back into the set, causing the PLL to unlock,
> thereby rendering your HT useless until repaired.

Sorry, but others of us have run the HTX-202 off the cigarette lighter
plug without suffering the problem you have.  My partner consistently runs
his HTX-202 off the plug in the ambulance in which we work, and has never
had the PLL unlock problem.

> I've gotten so
> cautious I won't even use the HT inside the car with the NiCad, because
> the metal and windshield might cause same problem.

Now, THAT sounds like paranoia instead of prudence.  If you're having
problems with the PLL on your HT unlocking, return it if it's under
warranty.

73 Wayne KF5ZC

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wayne Day KF5ZC  Fort Worth,Texas,USA                          |
   CompuServe: 76703,376   Internet: [e-mail]   |  ,__o
    or                     Internet: [e-mail]               |--\_<,
   Member: Bicycle Mobile Hams of America                       (*)/'(*)
 For info on BMHA or the BIKEHAM mailing list: Finger [e-mail]
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.emf.net!gatech!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2 m ht help please
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Sep 95 00:12:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <43i511$[e-mail]>
Lines: 20

JD>I am thinking of  buying on of those 2 meter radios that radio shack has
JD>on sale for 199 what kind of range can i expect out of these handheld
JD>would this be a good one for a beginner

I'm not sure this example is useful to you, but I used my 2 meter
Htx-202 from radio shack in a general aviation aircraft 70 miles to the
Northwest of Atlanta and had a conversation with a station on the
Lawrenceville repeater.  Altitude at the time was 6500ft MSL, 5500 feet
AGL approximate.  The horizantal range to the repeater antenna was
greater than 80 miles.  My power output was 5-6 watts.

Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Unable to locate Coffee -- Operator Halted!
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA
Phone: [phone]             Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!ddillon
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Dillon)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT 51R -Mods
Date: 19 Sep 1995 00:32:13 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <43l32d$[e-mail]>
References: <43hq4t$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: heart.engr.csulb.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

SlowalkJR ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I just purchased my first HT. I'm looking for information reguarding
: modifying the Yaesu FT51R to expand it's TX range. Thanks. Please send
: replys to SlowalkJR.
: James, KF4AQO

try this
ftp to oak.oakland.edu
I cant remember the directory, but it is under something like this.

cd pub\hamradio\mods\yaesu
after getting into the yaesu directory, type ls ft51* and you will see
about three files relating to yaesu ft51r mods.  one will list for the
5100.. you can disregard.

Another option is to go to Yeasu over in cerritos CA.  Ask for the
information on the keyboard entry adjustment to the mic deviation.  They
will give you a copy of a few pages of information regarding a few things
that can be adjusted via keyboard entry.  It looks interesting, but mine
works fabulous and I am not going to mod the thing.  I do not need to
transmit out of band.

If I really wanted to do so, I would use a ft470 for that.  Easy to mod,
and an overall fabulous radio.  Yaesu provides fabulous customer service,
and that is the primary reason I made the purchase of my ft890, ft470,
and the ft57r along with lots of accessories.  They are intelligent,
friendly, efficient, fair priced, and honost when it comes to service.
Not only that, but they are up front with mods, and information, and
technical stuff.

By the way.. if you don't need to transmit out of band.. don't do the
mod.  There are no advantages... only disadvantages.  You will suffer
slightly higher intermod, lower sensitivity/selectivity... etc.  I will
un-mod mine next time I have it opened.

Just my $0.02 worth.
Dan

--
 ------------------------73 de Dan,  K D 6 F P X-------------------------
 Finger or e-mail for PGPv2.6 key.    |  [*=]  [||]
 Internet:[e-mail]      | PGPprint=02 A6 07 34 22 80 53 09
 WWIVnet:#612 @ 1187                  |          8C 1E 5E 15 1A B4 43 1F
 Packet:kd6fpx@k6ve.#soca.ca.usa.noam |
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!gatech!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Sep 95 00:36:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <43kqkm$[e-mail]>
Lines: 38

RM>Steve Sims ([e-mail]) wrote:
RM>: JD> He is probably going to tell you that this is
RM>: JD>the rec.radio.amateur.equipment group and that this
RM>: JD>topic does not fit in with the "CONCEPT" of this
RM>: JD>discussion group.

RM>: Oh, Well you seem to know the concept of this discussion group.  I guess
RM>: it must be available for downloading from the bbs somewhere.  Which
RM>: discussion group does it belong to instead ?

RM>   Actually, the original poster is quite correct.  Any valid newsgroup
RM>other than those in the alt.* heirarchy had charters approved when the
RM>newsgroup was first created.  In this particular case, the group was
RM>supposed to be limited to discussions directly related to the operation
RM>and/or discusions about radio equipment.

RM>   Rec.radio.amateur.misc would be a more appropriate forum.  You might
RM>also want to browse news.answers, which tells all about news group
RM>conventions, and might save you from making statements you'll have
RM>to retract later.

RM>- Rich

Actually, I was not being sarcastic in my above sentences.  I do not
understand the reference to alt.*, but I suspect that our various ways
of accessing these messages are quite diverse.  However, if my messages
are in the wrong group I'm sorry.  That, of course, means that the other
off the topic comments I was responding to were equally misplaced.

-- Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . Chicken heads are the chief food of captive alligators.
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA
Phone: [phone]             Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!ddillon
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Dillon)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) vs. Yaesu FT-51R (HP)
Date: 19 Sep 1995 00:50:42 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 78
Message-ID: <43l452$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43i26e$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: heart.engr.csulb.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Da Baz ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Dear fellow Hams,

:    I am considering buying a dual-band HT and I have narrowed my choices
: down to the Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) and the Yaesu FT-51R (HP, 5 watt
: version).  I would appreciate anything you have to say about these two
: radios that might aid me in my decison.  Thanks for your time.

: Sincerely,
:                   Basil "Baz" Gravanis, w/ WA2EIU
Don't even consider the kenwood th 79a.  The yaesu is a fabulous radio...
you will find it as solid as previous yaesu's.

If you do get the kenwood, you will find it plagued with the same
problems as previous (recent models) kenwood ht's... intermod, poor
selectivity, pain to learn to use all of the details etc.

Get the Yaesu ft 51r, Don't get the windows software.. because the radio
is so easy to use it boggles the mind.  The layout of operation is just
like the older yaesu ft470, but adds all the new features.

You can even check the battery voltage WHILE transmitting so that you
have a sort of load test on the battery to see where your remaining
capacity really is.  It had on screen (lcd) menus that scroll across and
tell you how to program the various features of the radio.  There are on
screen menus for just about every function except the dtmf storage.  This
radio will search and find the proper PL tone for you, and if you read
the manual carefully you will find that it also has DTMF decoding
functions that will display heard dtmf tones across the bottom half of
the radio while the radio behaves as normal.

More importantly than any of the aformentioned little features and
benefits of the radio, the radio preforms well as a radio.  Barring any
of the really cool features, you will find low intermod, highly selective
front end, nice sensitivity, and the audio has a fairly high output for
the occasional noisy environment.  All previous accessories (barring
batteries and external power) are compatable with the new ft51r, and
according to the bird thruline wattmeter, the little wonder does in fact
procuce the full 5 watt output unlike some rigs.

Here is the kicker.. I have the ft51r, and another radio.  The other
radio procuces slightly more than 5 watts (abt 5.2W), and the 51r procuces
something like 4.95 watts or so.  With both radios using their respective
stock antennas, from the exact same location, the 51R gets into the local
repeater FULL QUIETING, whereas my other radio can barely hold the
machine.  Go figure that out.  I switched antennas, and tried all kinds
of things, but have not yet come up with a reasonable explanation.  (by
the way... the other radio was serviced top to bottom to spec, and has no
problems.)

Anyway, that is my input on your delemma.   Get the Yeasu... you will
like it.  (get the carry case too. you will be glad)  I like the new
charger way better than the old yaesu charger, but it pisses me off that
the new batteries could not be charged on the old charger... the old
batteries, however, can be charged on the new charger.  This charger
really is nice.. it charges fast, and switches into trickle charge to
keep a nice float on your batteries.  It can't be fooled either.  If you
put a charged battery on the thing, it kicks over to trickle charge
within a few minutes of fast charging.

Another note... if you are planning to get the low power version and pop
a high power battery on it soon... you will save money by buying the high
power version and then buying the low power battery.  I am told by HRO
that that will save you some money.  (I will be buying non-yaesu
batteries... you save a fair bit of money that way.


Hope my input helped
Dan


--
 ------------------------73 de Dan,  K D 6 F P X-------------------------
 Finger or e-mail for PGPv2.6 key.    |  [*=]  [||]
 Internet:[e-mail]      | PGPprint=02 A6 07 34 22 80 53 09
 WWIVnet:#612 @ 1187                  |          8C 1E 5E 15 1A B4 43 1F
 Packet:kd6fpx@k6ve.#soca.ca.usa.noam |
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:29 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!sysop
From: [e-mail] (Allen Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Kenwood TS-520S w/phnptch, mic, extspkr $375 or trade
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 04:01:22 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <43lee7$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: seminole.gate.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99a.107

(1) Kenwood TS-520S, excellent condition,  works fine.  Comes with
original PC-1 Patch controller, MIC-50 microphone, SP-520 external
speaker (although the internal one works fine, too), all in great
working order with manuals (even the PC-1!)  Makes a great phone relay
or field day machine - includes original 12-volt adapter harness.
$375 negotiable, will consider partial cash/trades in exchange for
(all working) VHF packet/microwave equipment, or even unusual stuff
like radar guns, night vision goggles, computer equipment and the
like.  Purchase of Yaesu FT1000D forces sale.

All serious inquiries to: [e-mail] or phone [phone].

73,
Allen L. Wright      KE4MIO




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!penage.cs.laurentian.ca!nickel.laurentian.ca!rbrummer
From: [e-mail] (RICHARD BRUMMER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: WTB: FT-840 or IC-735
Date: 19 Sep 95 06:30:13 -0500
Organization: Laurentian University
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nickel.laurentian.ca


I'm looking for a Yaesu FT840 or Icom IC735.

Please email me with prices if anyone has equipment for sale.




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!hbcsc274
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT-530 & FT-470
Date: 19 Sep 1995 06:50:34 GMT
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43lp7q$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.csun.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


I have a Yaesu FT-530 and I am wondering if the FT-470 uses the same type
of battery?  ie. can I use the same battery on both the 530 & the 470?
73
Jerry KE6UUX



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purch
Date: 19 Sep 1995 10:01:49 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 26
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43migd$[e-mail]>
References: <43mdd4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43mdd4$[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Brad Mitchel) writes:

>
>Ditto. Who is it really hurting anyway if a few missguided soles post
here?
>I rather think that it's more of a control issue at hand here rather
>than a real problem.  Some people just like to control..
>       Hey, let your hair hang down, you might like it..
>
>
>Brad WB8YGG

Hi Brad,

I think the problem may eventually come in the volume of for sale
postings. That's why I never bother to download the radio.swap group, it's
just too much stuff to sort through.

I see the potential problem "for sale posts" can cause here, and agree
they should be discouraged. If the volume ever gets a tenth as high as on
radio.swap this group will be useless. Why wait until it becomes a problem
before controling it?

73 Tom



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!usenet
From: KC5HEG
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Which one should I get  -  TH-79a or FT51r or Ic-Z1A ?
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 95 10:30:09 PST
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   [phone]
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43mnlt$[e-mail]>
References: <43kvma$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam-slip-j2.neosoft.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.6

In article <43kvma$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says...
>
>Which of these units should I get ?   They are all about the same price.
>They all have more features than you could shake a stick at.  I am STUMPED
>!  I will be using it in an urban environment(Los Angeles) so Intermod
>could be a problem.   Any help would be most appreciated !
>
Scott...
If I had to do it over again, I'd get the 51r. I have the Z1A, and find the
electronic volume control is a real pain to operate, & the receive audio quality
(even with an external speaker) is poor compared to other HT's I've owned/used.  On
the plus side, it is excellent at intermod rejection, very easy to program & use, &
the large display & buttons are excellent for big fat fingers compared to other
small HTs.
73 de KC5HEG  Tom   [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!nobody
From: [e-mail] (Craig Bosworth)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) vs. Yaesu FT-51R (HP)
Date: 19 Sep 1995 11:02:59 -0700
Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43i26e$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdlgd9.sdd.hp.com

In article <43i26e$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Da Baz) writes:
>   I am considering buying a dual-band HT and I have narrowed my choices
>down to the Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) and the Yaesu FT-51R (HP, 5 watt
>version).  I would appreciate anything you have to say about these two
>radios that might aid me in my decison.  Thanks for your time.

I have an FT-51R and I *love* it.  It is a much better radio than my
Kenwood TH-78 was.  It comes with a very nice stock rubber duck.
Accessories are more avaliable (Radio Shack cheapies work with it).
It has a voltmeter built in.  And it will do CTCSS scan.

I also have the PC programming kit.  This is extremely useful.  I have
my local settings in one file, and various travel settings in others.
It makes it trivial to do a cold reset on the radio -- just download
the settings again in about 1 minute.

The receiver is outstanding considering its small package.  It puts
my PRO-43 to shame on 450MHz.  Intermod is not nearly as bad as on the
TH-78.

Unfortunately, I have no basis for comparison with the TH-79.  Actually,
I was planning on buying a used dualband HT probably a TH-78, but I got
the FT-51 because of the PC programability.  I'd say programming from
the PC is a killer feature that *all* HTs will have to add in order to
be competitive.

So, because you can't program the TH-79 from the PC, I'd reccomend the
FT-51.
--
Craig Bosworth, KD6WQH  Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
[e-mail]  kd6wqh@wb6dgr.#soca.ca.usa.na  [phone]


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.cc.tut.fi!sievert.ee.tut.fi!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Keskinen Petri)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Specs on LDF-50A 1/2" Coax or Andrews ph #
Date: 19 Sep 1995 12:48:40 +0300
Organization: Tampere University of Technology
Lines: 22
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43m3lo$[e-mail]>
References: <41qer3$[e-mail]> <Leonardo_Escalante-1209951339270001@128.148.177.169>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sievert.ee.tut.fi


Can anyone find same datas for Andrew LDF-??? 50Ohm
7/8"  cable? We just managed to get some from local
phone company, but  no specs found.

TNX  in advance!

Pete
oh3mep















From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.gmi.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!jake.esu.edu!galaxy.bloomu.edu!loss
From: "John M. Rymell" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tentec Scout
Date: 19 Sep 1995 13:02:30 GMT
Organization: Bloomsburg University
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43mf16$[e-mail]>
References: <43jcfr$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ryme.bloomu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b1 (Windows; I; 16bit)

host [e-mail] (Your real Name) wrote:
>I am thinking about buying a Tentec Scout. If you have used one would you
>please E-mail your opinions to me?
>
>Thanks,
>Joe AA6WG
>

 Joe,

  Nice little rig for the bucks. Using a Scout as a portable rig for
RACES drills over the past 6 months.
  Enjoy the freatures. Light, small, easy to handle in field conditions.
This is a real 'thumbs up' recommendation!

73, and enjoy!

John Rymell N3PFF



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!simtel!news.kei.com!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.cerf.net!pagesat.net!a3bsrv.nai.net!mgate.arrl.org!news
From: Zack Lau <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Date: 19 Sep 1995 13:19:58 GMT
Organization: American Radio Relay League
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43mg1u$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mgate.arrl.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)

[e-mail] (Richard Anderson) wrote:
> -=> Quoting Jeffrey D. Stai to All <=-
>
>
> >I have a 2m Allmode (FT-290) and would like to get on 6m.  Is a
> >2m to 6m transverter available?
>
Sort of.  I think they are marketed in Europe but not the
USA.  If you really want one credit cards often make international
mail order practical.

Ten Tec sells a 20 meter to 6 meter kit.

I plan to publish a 2M to 6 meter transverter design in QEX.
However, no circuit boards will be available unless someone
else designs them.  After all, QEX is an experimenter's
exchange published by the ARRL. I think circuit boards
discourage experimentation.

Zack KH6CP/1
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!pendragon.jsc.nasa.gov!ames!olivea!sfgw!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Roberto Valfredini)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 751 Service Manual
Date: 19 Sep 1995 13:36:36 GMT
Organization: OLIVETTI   Ivrea  (ITALY)
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <43mh14$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hqlab74.ico.olivetti.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2




Hi to all,
i am looking for the service manual of IC751
note not 751A but 751 here in italy the company
that sell icom equipment DOES NOT HAVE it and
any effort to find it at the moment is null
so i am posting it here hopping that someone
can give an help hand.

I see some solution at the problem :

1. someone can check with ICOM USA if it is available
   (at least a xerox of it), and/or supply addr of ICOM USA.

2. someone can ship it to me and I will xerox it
   then send it back the day after. (I will return any shipment cost)

3. any other good idea are welcome.


Note the 751 main board if pretty different from the 751A
and the sevice manual of 751A that i have (xerox) is not
good to make allineament and fix of the rtx.

If you think you can help me on fixing this rtx (not very
good modulation in SSB ) please contact me, i do not want
to bore all the people with my story.

please respond using email if possible at

[e-mail]

thank anybody for the time

Roberto

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      P L E A S E    N O T E
Ing. C. Olivetti S.p.A takes no responsibility for the views expressed in
this mail/post.   They are the personal views of the user concerned.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:39 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!milcom
From: [e-mail] (wayne roberts)
Subject: Re: Mobile UHF Duplexer Recommend
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: netcom online communications
References: <43cthj$[e-mail]> <mmusick-1809951001200001@198.102.74.50>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 14:18:11 GMT
Lines: 19
Sender: [e-mail]

In article <mmusick-1809951001200001@198.102.74.50>,
>To tune duplexers correctly takes patience, knowledge - and a spectrum
>analyzer/sweep generator. It's not something I'd want to consider doing in
>the field, and that's provided I had ready access to an analyzer.
>Duplexers usually come from they factory tuned to your application, and I,
>for one, am glad they do.

Tuning can be such a chore without the right eqiupment.  It can be
frustrating in all cases if you find out you have a broken ground
on a test cable.
   Tuning of such filters i've found has never been easyer than with
a HP8753C/D.  It's a microprocessor controlled network analyzer
which consists of a sythesized sweeper.  That is the key to tuning
cavities, the ability to set a marker and know its on the right
frequency and will stay.  In addition the ability to view return
loss and insertion loss simultaneously while sweeping thru both RX
and TX frequencies makes tuning easy enough for almost anyone.
   But the 8753 is a bit overkill for that, with its vector functions.
Scalar only network analyzers are available for 1/4 the price.


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!newsserver.rdcs.Kodak.COM!dtcs70!mitchell
From: [e-mail] (Brad Mitchel)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purch
Date: 19 Sep 1995 14:21:12 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 26
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43mjko$[e-mail]>
References: <43migd$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.126.153.70


>
>Hi Brad,
>
>I think the problem may eventually come in the volume of for sale
>postings. That's why I never bother to download the radio.swap group, it's
>just too much stuff to sort through.
>
>I see the potential problem "for sale posts" can cause here, and agree
>they should be discouraged. If the volume ever gets a tenth as high as on
>radio.swap this group will be useless. Why wait until it becomes a problem
>before controling it?
>
>73 Tom
>

Point well taken. Maybe an automatic reminder to the group once a month would be
sufficient. Otherwise there will be those out there that will flame the first
poor sole that posts for sale. I guess that way, it would keep traffic like
this posting to a minmum.
        I do however feel that the amount of postings so far to this group are
a minimum, and to me it's not a bother.
                Of course, that's just my point of view.
73 Brad WB8YGG




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntpgate.primenet.com!nntpdist.primenet.com!ip157.phx.primenet.com!ah0w
From: [e-mail] (Frank R. Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: error
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 14:40:55 MST
Organization: Primenet
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip157.phx.primenet.com
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]


UUENCODED by Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]

BEGIN--cut here--cut here----
begin 640 HUOMIOTA.TXT
M`?X-3`T````-````H`6P$U0;``#0`@````#__________P`!```/`0``GP(`
M`(`"```*`(H"```*`````````````````````````)0"`````)0"`````)0"
M`````)0"```+`*`%H`4(!P@'X#W0+P$``````-`".`0```````"4`@``````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M`````````````````````````````````````````&5I(&AU;VUI;W1A#0H-
M"@``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M``````````````````````````````````$```\!``![````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M`````````````````P`($`$``0``#0$```\!````````````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
M````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
I`````````````@`!```/`0```P```0``#P$```0`$!`(0T<@5&EM97,`
`
end
END--cut here--cut here----


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!bbs.mhv.net!Thomas.Randall
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 19 Sep 1995 16:18:13 GMT
Organization: MHVNet, the Mid Hudson Valley's Internet connection
Lines: 39
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43mqg5$[e-mail]>
References: <42lsse$[e-mail]> <43h7rv$[e-mail]> <43li5k$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: csbh.mhv.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

John Olson ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Thomas Randall ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : Drew Durigan ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : : What great timing!  I just passed my tests this past weekend and should
: : : be getting my Tech-Plus ticket soon.  My 2510's all ready to go on 10-
: : : meters (finally get to use that radio for it's "intended" purpose :-),
: : : but I need to get me a good, inexpensive 2-meter rig to get started with.


: : : I understand Radio Shack has put the HTX-202 on sale for $199 this month.
: : :  Is this a good radio or another one of those famous "Rat Scrap Lemons?"
: : : Is it worth $199, or would I do better elsewhere?

: : : Comments?


: : : -Drew in Charlotte-



: :   Drew,
: :    Get the 202, it's a nice rig. I also recommend spending the extra
: : money on the maintanence plan just in case you drop her off a cliff or
: : off the table. I've had mine since October of last year and not one
: : problem so far. Sturdy radio by the way!

: : Tom - KB2SMS

:   Drew: The HTX-202 is ok for normal voice communications, BUT IF you
: have any asperations of running packet with it - FORGET IT! It's JUNK.
: Congrats on the new ticket!
:                                    73's  John  WA6IKO



 I disagree! I use mine for packet with NO PROBLEMS at all. Works just great.

Tom - KB2SMS



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dormouse.icanect.net!news
From: Geoff Caplan <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: St. Thomas, USVI after Hurricane Marilyn
Date: 19 Sep 1995 17:17:25 GMT
Organization: Internet Communications Of America, Inc.
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <43mtv5$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: marmaduke.icanect.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

We have set up an information page for posting about survivors,
messages, etc. on St. Thomas. We are also trying to determine
if there is currently any amateur radio coming from the area.
If you have information of any type, please feel free to post
directly to http://www.icanect.net/thomas

Thank you.



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dormouse.icanect.net!news
From: Bob Hurwitz <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: St Thomas Emergency Center
Date: 19 Sep 1995 17:24:22 GMT
Organization: Internet Communications Of America, Inc.
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <43muc6$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-05.dade.icanect.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Icanect has established an emergency response center for St. Thomas
All Ham operators please help we are trying to relay all messages....
Some of our employees commute to and from the island..
we have contacts with pager  and phone companies on the island

http://www.icanect.net/thomas/index.htm


--

Internet Communications of America, Inc.




From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!well!miwok!news.scruz.net!garlic.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bill Childers)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) vs. Yaesu FT-51R (HP)
Date: 19 Sep 1995 18:22:57 GMT
Organization: South Valley Internet
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <43n1q1$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43i26e$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: j.assign.garlic.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3

I owned both... I just sold my Kenwood & bought the Yaesu FT51R...
I prefer the Yaesu because it has more programmability with the features, scan
types, and such.
The Kenwood is easier to operate, however, and it is a great radio in itself.
The gentleman who bought mine says that it's the best HT he's ever owned.  I
say the same about my FT51R... I boils down to opinion.
The Yaesu is capable of being programmed from a desktop computer, though,
which I find neat.
Bill Childers


In article <43i26e$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Da Baz) wrote:
>Dear fellow Hams,
>
>   I am considering buying a dual-band HT and I have narrowed my choices
>down to the Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) and the Yaesu FT-51R (HP, 5 watt
>version).  I would appreciate anything you have to say about these two
>radios that might aid me in my decison.  Thanks for your time.
>
>Sincerely,
>                  Basil "Baz" Gravanis, w/ WA2EIU


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.iac.honeywell.com!news
From: Alf Green <alf>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Icom IC706?
Date: 19 Sep 1995 19:36:31 GMT
Organization: Honeywell IAC, Phoenix AZ
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43n63v$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: agreen.iac.honeywell.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.03 9000/715)
X-URL: news://news/rec.radio.amateur.equipment#[e-mail]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17108 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86673

Has anyone actually got their hands on one of these beasts yet? I am on the
list at the local emporium, but it seems they won't be here until mid-October.

I got the impression from GJ4ICD's page that they were already available in
Europe. Anyone over there confirm this? How about elsewhere in the world?

I'd be interested in hearing any comments about this unit before I take
delivery.

73s  Alf     NU8I/G4ABB
[e-mail]
Phoenix,  AZ



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Glenn Sparks)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS HTX-202 Warning!
Date: 19 Sep 1995 19:48:33 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <43n6qh$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-hou7-18.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Sep 19 12:48:33 PM PDT 1995


>> never plug your 202 into the cigar lighter with
>> your 12-volt+ battery UNLESS you're using an external antenna
>> (like a mag-mount).  If you use the rubber duckie, the 5+ watts of
RF
>> you generate feed back into the set, causing the PLL to unlock,
>> thereby rendering your HT useless until repaired.
>
I have 3 202's.  One is one of the very first produced, about 3 years
old.  I have used it for packet, 12 with duck, external antenna, bad
antenna, outside, in rain, in my office next to my computer and all
kinds of things, and never had a problem with it.

I got my wife one about 2 years ago, she uses it with a 12v adaptor,
and sometimes the duck, and sometimes and outside antenna, never had a
problem with that one either.  BTW neither of us has ever bothered to
take off the battery pack when running with external power.

I also have one I picked up about 18 months ago for $25.  It seems the
chap had dropped it in the flood waters, and didn't have the extended
warrenty which would have replaced it.  He took it apart, dried it out,
and said all it would do it give and er message.  I gave him $25 for it
at a sidewalk sale in peices, put it back together, read the manual,
found out how to reset the er code, and it works perfect, and I have
had no problem with it either.  It gets beach duty when I go to the
beach and use a 12v weedeater battery with the duck.

When I first got it I would often tell people I was running a
Yeacomwood or something, and would always get excellent reports,
especially about the audio.  After I would tell them I was switching to
the RS to see how it sounded I almost always got a less favorable
report, such as distortion in the audio, white noise, off frequency
etc. All with the same radio.

Try it for yourself, use the same radio, tell the guy on the other end
you want to compare the RS with xxxxx, you will almost always get a
better report on the xxxxx signal.

KI5GY  Glenn Sparks


From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!bbs.mhv.net!Thomas.Randall
From: [e-mail] (Thomas Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RS HTX-202 Warning!
Date: 19 Sep 1995 20:45:15 GMT
Organization: MHVNet, the Mid Hudson Valley's Internet connection
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <43na4r$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <43n6qh$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: csbh.mhv.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Glenn Sparks ([e-mail]) wrote:

: >> never plug your 202 into the cigar lighter with
: >> your 12-volt+ battery UNLESS you're using an external antenna
: >> (like a mag-mount).  If you use the rubber duckie, the 5+ watts of
: RF
: >> you generate feed back into the set, causing the PLL to unlock,
: >> thereby rendering your HT useless until repaired.
: >
: I have 3 202's.  One is one of the very first produced, about 3 years
: old.  I have used it for packet, 12 with duck, external antenna, bad
: antenna, outside, in rain, in my office next to my computer and all
: kinds of things, and never had a problem with it.

: I got my wife one about 2 years ago, she uses it with a 12v adaptor,
: and sometimes the duck, and sometimes and outside antenna, never had a
: problem with that one either.  BTW neither of us has ever bothered to
: take off the battery pack when running with external power.

: I also have one I picked up about 18 months ago for $25.  It seems the
: chap had dropped it in the flood waters, and didn't have the extended
: warrenty which would have replaced it.  He took it apart, dried it out,
: and said all it would do it give and er message.  I gave him $25 for it
: at a sidewalk sale in peices, put it back together, read the manual,
: found out how to reset the er code, and it works perfect, and I have
: had no problem with it either.  It gets beach duty when I go to the
: beach and use a 12v weedeater battery with the duck.

: When I first got it I would often tell people I was running a
: Yeacomwood or something, and would always get excellent reports,
: especially about the audio.  After I would tell them I was switching to
: the RS to see how it sounded I almost always got a less favorable
: report, such as distortion in the audio, white noise, off frequency
: etc. All with the same radio.

: Try it for yourself, use the same radio, tell the guy on the other end
: you want to compare the RS with xxxxx, you will almost always get a
: better report on the xxxxx signal.

: KI5GY  Glenn Sparks



  Glenn,
    Glad to hear another favorable 202 review. I've had mine almost a
year with NO troubles at all so far. Very sturdy rig also. I love mine.
what I like to do is when someone asks me what rig I'm using I first ask
them "how does it sound?" They always say great in all respects...then I
tell them it's the 202! quite a few folks in my area use them and also
like them.

Tom



From [e-mail] Tue Sep 19 18:45:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Stephen A. King)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 21:09:48 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <43nc24$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <432lgc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <437r1u$[e-mail]> <43d9jv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ir6-19.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Sep 19  2:17:56 PM PDT 1995
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99a.107

[e-mail] (Dan Brown) wrote:

>[e-mail] (jdb ) wrote:
>
>>Selling a transmitter to an UNLICENSED individual is
>>simply WRONG. If a person is interested in becoming a ham
>>he DOES not need a rig that will transmit. He needs nothing
>
>       Would you mind explaining, rationally, without resorting to ad hominem
>attacks, why it is wrong to sell a transceiver to an unlicensed
>individual?  Neither the law nor morals is much based on need.  I
>don't need a Porsche, in the strictest sense; that doesn't make it
>wrong for me to have one, or for someone to sell it to me.
>
>       I've already explained several legitimate reasons why an unlicensed
>person might want to buy a transceiver.  The most basic are these:
>(1) the most common advice to people who want to learn code or other
>operating practices is to listen on the air, and (2) most new ham
>equipment is in the form of transceivers, not separate
>transmitter/receivers.
>
>       I bought a 2m HT before I received my license, so I could listen to
>the local repeaters and get used to the normal customs there.  Why was
>it wrong for the dealer to sell it to me?  Given that it's not wrong
>for me to listen to a repeater, why should I have to buy a scanner to
>do that, and pay almost as much as I'd pay for the HT?
>
I owned an HF rig and a 70cm HT **before** I got my license, and would
do it pretty much the same way again.

As you stated, why in the world would I want to buy ***just a
receiver*** for very much the same price as a transceiver? The answer
is that I wouldn't.

I suspect that these "HAMs" only types are probably the same types of
people that think that if you can't do CW you are not a "real HAM",
conveniently forgetting that there is so much more to HAM than just
CW.

But, let them continue, and if they stay in business, I'll be
surprised.




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!nntpgate.primenet.com!nntpdist.primenet.com!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: Re: HTX100 schem or transverter mods??
Date: 11 Sep 1995 12:45:27 GMT
Organization: Primenet
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <431b17$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip044.phx.primenet.com
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17153 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9540

In <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Muenzler, Kevin) writes:
> [e-mail] (Joe Landis - Systems & Network Mgr) writes:
>
> -Hi,
> -Does anyone have a schematic for the Radio Shack HTX100 10 meter rig,
> -or has anyone added seperate low-level transmit and recieve?
> -I'd like to use mine for a 28mhz tunable if for a DEM 432 mhz IF
>transverter.
> -
> -Thanks,
> -Joe - AA3GN

        qrz.com has a large mods directory with text files, no schematics, that will
help. Check ftp.qrz.com or www.qrz.com. Or buy the cd-rom if all else fails.

Jim N7TCF


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.drexel.edu!news.ge.com!ctrlnews.erie.ge.com!news.crd.ge.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!usenet.ufl.edu!freenet3.scri.fsu.edu!freenet1.scri.fsu.edu!cwixson
From: [e-mail] (Chuck Wixson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Change WBFM to NBFM????
Date: 11 Sep 1995 17:18:31 GMT
Organization: Tallahassee Free-Net
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <431r17$[e-mail]>
References: <42e92l$[e-mail]>
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9538 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17152 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86721

I have a few of those RT-68's and have fun using them just the way
they are.  Talk lightly and the nbfm'ers can hear you, or talk loud to
another rt-68 and its the only thing that will hear you. you'll get
used to limiting the audio.  Any-way , thats how i use mine. Also have
a few rt-67's and rt.70's.  Want to convert the 70's to cw.

See-Ya

Chuck, WD8DTH, MICHIGAN


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (MattCrw17)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: help with DTMF reciever project
Date: 14 Sep 1995 18:44:39 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 16
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43ab8n$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (MattCrw17)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I would really appreciate any help or info on this project.  Maybe
somebody here has built something similar to this, and could E-mail me
tips or schematics but do not post for my benefit because I do not
frequent this group.


Okay, I need a DTMF pad hooked up to a inexpensize short range transmitter
walkie-talkey, homebrew,or somthing like that.  I need to have my reciever
fire a relay or solenoid or something when the proper 4 digit code is
entered.  P.S. must be portable (DC)  My problem is I have little
expertise, but I could have somebody build it properly if it is too
involved.  Tips on where to salvage circuts from for this are also
appreciated.


Thanx. E-mail me


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!news.mtu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.delphi.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (KEVIN DEAL)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Military trans and receivers FS
Date: 14 Sep 1995 22:19:06 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 38
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43anqq$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (KEVIN DEAL)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

The following is a list of military transimitting equipment.   The BC
191's of course have 4  211/VT4C
each. Three of the four in each one look new, and I had planned to take
them all out.  So bid without those
tubes included.  If you want tomake an offer with the tubes left in,
include that as well as a bid without
them.

BC191E  with TU-6B which tunes from 3000-4000 KC (hard to find)

BC191F with TU5N which tunes from 1500-3000KC  (also hard to find)

T-20 in black tunes from 3-4

T-20 in silver tunes from 5.3-7

The next three are in a single rack. They have transformers on the rear of
each that unplug  leaving the
original socket.

R-24  marked MT-7 tunes from .52-1.5 three antenae jacks black in color.

R-24  marked Western Electric BC-455B tunes 6-9.1 silver in color.

R-24  marked Western Electric BC-453B tunes 190-550 KC silver in color.

R-24 black tunes .52-1.5 this one is in it's own single rack.  Has a
removable transformer on the back
which would leave it with the original socket

Radio receiver BC966A

Radar unit SN36A (I know nothing about this thing)

Wireless set No 19 MK II supply unit No 1


Send e-mail private or call [phone] 8Am-10PM PDT


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver2.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!bcm.tmc.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.mty.itesm.mx!news.internet.com.mx!usenet
From: JOSE ANTONIO BARAJAS CORONADO <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FM RECEIVER/TRANSMITTER
Date: 15 Sep 1995 00:29:02 GMT
Organization: S.T.C. "Metro de la Ciudad de MΘxico"
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <43ahce$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inter043.internet.com.mx
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 16bit)

I┤m searching for a fm transmitter and a fm receiver for distance aprox.
300 fts.


I would like to know if somebody knows where can I buy the kits or
the pieces for construct it.

If you now something please send me the information.



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Meraglia)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: RC-1000 Repeater Controller???
Date: 15 Sep 1995 00:51:03 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 2
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43ailn$[e-mail]>
References: <439hqp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap1.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

Dont waste your money, we did and are very sorry!



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (PeterJS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help with TS-440S/TS-450S
Date: 15 Sep 1995 01:16:56 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 30
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43b288$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (PeterJS)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I've got a TS-450S-AT connected to an R7 vertical and
started comparing the SWR readings of the internal SWR
meter on the transciever to an external SWR/Power meter
between the antennae feed line and the transciever.  On 17, 15,
12 and 10 meters, the readings on the TX and the external SWR meter
agree but on 20, 30 and 40 meters, the transciever SWR meter shows
a very nice 1-1.5 SWR reading on these bands when using the
auto tune feature but meanwhile, the external SWR/Power meter
shows SWR readings of greater than 3:1 on 20/30/40.  I think I've got a
problem with the tuner on the TS-450S-AT but in discussions
with Kenwood tech support, they say I don't have a problem - if the
SWR reading on the transciever is fine, then the circuit is tuned
AND in fact, the external SWR meter shouldn't necessarily agree with
what the transciever reads.  This makes no sense to me.

Two questions:

For those out there with TS440/T450 rigs who happen to also
use an external SWR meter separate from the on-board meter in
the TS-440/TS450, do you find differences in SWR readings
between the rig and the external meter?

Is this really true that there should be no relationship between
the on-board SWR reading in the TS440/TS450 and the external
meter?  I would think that the readings would be slightly different
but in my case, the differences are so great to make me think that
the TS-450S didn't tune the circuit right on the above bands in the first
place as evidenced by the terrible reading on the external SWR meter.

Thanks ... Peter, KE6VMJ


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:27:59 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.drexel.edu!news.ge.com!ctrlnews.erie.ge.com!news.crd.ge.com!rebecca!rpi!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!mv!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Bryan King)
Subject: Re: Scout Freq Compensation
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Paul Hurley)
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 02:25:08 GMT
References: <42mkub$[e-mail]> <42t7ov$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.3
Lines: 17

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Steve Ellington) says:
>
>That ham was correct. Call Ten Tec and ask them. Maybe you could disable
>that feature and let her drift.
>--
>  Steve
>[e-mail]
>
>
Actually I found out that this may be disabled when trying to set the
keyer speed.  I noticed one day that the frequency drifted quite
noticeably when I was trying to set the internal keyer's speed.
The CPU controls both FLS (freq lock software) and keyer speed and
probably cannot do both at once.  Its only a 5 mips RISC chip.


73's -- Bryan


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!psuvax1!news.math.psu.edu!hudson.lm.com!godot.cc.duq.edu!toads.pgh.pa.us!news.pgh.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!in1.uu.net!felix.TECLink.net!usenet
From: Thomas Martin <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: DR600TB
Date: 15 Sep 1995 02:42:13 GMT
Organization: Martin Enterprises
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43ap65$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc1_50.teclink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

I have noticed a strange thing with my DR600. I feel I may have
found a software bug but not sure. When I use the rig in remote
control mode. Using an HT to control the rig. If I change
memory channels with the HT and then enable crossband the
memory channel jumps back to the original channel but the
frequency display is still where I set it to.

If this is not a software bug I want to send the rig back for
repair but if it is a software bug I think I could probably
live with it.

Anyone ran across this problem? Any comments appreciated.

Thomas Martin
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:01 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!newshub1.wanet.net!ucsnews!newshub.sdsu.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!btnet!news.netkonect.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.ramlink.net!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: re: for sale kenwood ts-520
Date: 15 Sep 1995 05:01:30 GMT
Organization: RAMLink Internet Access Service
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43b1ba$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: email: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ash13.ramlink.net
Keywords: kenwood ts-520
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

For Sale Kenwood TS-520 Transceiver
$360.00 plus shipping  with manual
email: [e-mail]
call 606-836-6696 home
or 606-324-1726 ext. 373  work


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:02 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!eskimo!news
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Request help on old amatuer radio
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News User Id)
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99.82
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 08:08:59 GMT
Lines: 13

 Respectfully seeking info on an old '41 Hallicrafter Sky Champion
that I just purchased today. While I originally went to get an old
Emerson radio, this was thrown in with the deal. Good shape. Looks
like, though certainly not sure, that with a new cord, and a string
for a volume pulley, that it might even work. Model number is S20R.
Has a metal case. Any info, history, and even a wild guess as to worth
would be greatly appreciated. Also, anyone know of a good source
of  older microphones that would have been used with this radio?

Thanks,

John



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!brutus.bright.net!news
From: Jon Ferrall <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: TM-451A TX and RX down to 430.000 ???
Date: 15 Sep 1995 10:45:11 GMT
Organization: BrightNet
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <43blfn$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: defi1-cs-8.dial.bright.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Anyone out the know of a mod to the Kenwood TM-451A to allow operation
down to 430.000 MHz ???? Please Post...Thanks



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.starnet.net!wupost!news.bridge.com!news.mid.net!news.dakota.net!news
From: [e-mail] (Tom Bodoh)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: Drake R8 and DSP
Date: 15 Sep 1995 11:50:24 GMT
Organization: Dakota Internet Services, Inc.
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <43bpa1$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp5.dakota.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.swap:43444 rec.radio.shortwave:58743 rec.radio.scanner:32410 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17154

For sale:  Drake R8 shortwave reveiver.  Mint condition, with box,
manual, RS232 cable and original packing material.  Also includes
Radio Shack DSP like new in box.  Terms are $675 by Postal Money
order, I pay your choice of UPS or USPS postage.  Email me, or
call 605-582-2328.  Thanks...

Tom, N0YGT



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:04 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!cello.gina.calstate.edu!swrl71.gina.slip.csu.net!rhought
From: Robert D Houghton <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Spahn Ranch linked with 2 Murders in Phili
Date: 15 Sep 1995 12:38:53 GMT
Organization: Physics teacher/Science Chairman
Lines: 9
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43bs4t$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.150.1.71
X-UserAgent: 1.1
X-XXMessage-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-XXDate: Fri, 15 Sep 95 12:43:59 GMT

Am I missing something here?
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|
|                              |  AMSAT member #26148                    |
| Robert D. Houghton           |  digital satellites: KC6LVG@PACSAT      |
| Science Department Chairman  |  Packet radio: kc6lvg@k6unq.#cas.na     |
| John A. Rowland High School  |  Other internet:                        |
| Rowland Heights, CA 91748    |    [e-mail]                     |
|                              |    [e-mail]    |
|++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newshub1.wanet.net!ucsnews!newshub.sdsu.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!isnews.csc.calpoly.edu!violin.aix.calpoly.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Kirk James Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: New Yaseu HT?
Date: 15 Sep 1995 15:35:49 -0700
Organization: Biological Sciences Department, Cal Poly SLO
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43cv45$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: violin.aix.calpoly.edu
NNTP-Posting-User: kjsmith

Does anyone have any info on the new Yaseu single-band "mil spec" (for
target practice?) HTs that I see on the back page of October QST?  They
look interesting.

Is DCS compatable with DPL (same thing, or some weird ham bastardization?)?
Fast scan speed = ? channels per second?

I've sworn off buying ham gear after getting tired of the quality (I own
Icom and Alinco [the Alinco is better than the Icom!]), and use Motorola
at work...but this Yaseu COULD make me reconsider.



--
  Kirk J. Smith, KD6RCT, EMT-P |  Biological Sciences Department
  Senior, Microbiology         |  California Polytechnic State University
  [e-mail] |  San Luis Obispo, California, USA


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:07 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 NICAD battery pack...HOW TO OPEN?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <orbelld-1409950910420001@204.41.1.203>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 17:03:01 GMT
Lines: 20

In article <orbelld-1409950910420001@204.41.1.203> [e-mail] (David Orbell) writes:
>From the informative messages in this forum, I've come to the conclusion
>that I've got a bad cell in my NICAD 7.2 volt battery pack.
>
>Has anyone had any experience in opeing the battery packs from a FT-530?
>Can it be done in such a way, so that you can get it back together..... so
>that it will still attach properly to the FT-530?

Unfortunately, Yaesu packs are glued together. A method that works
pretty well is to throw it in the freezer for a couple of hours
then take it out and rap it sharply against the desktop. The glue
will have become brittle by the cold, and will usually part cleanly.
Once you've rebuilt the insert, just glue the pack back together.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver2.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!maple.enet.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Rick Checketts)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted- Ten Tec Accessory  -  276note.txt [1/1]
Date: 15 Sep 1995 19:09:27 GMT
Organization: Evergreen Communications
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <43cj17$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip24.enet.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.3

V291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBoYXZlIDI3NiBjYWxpYnJhdG9yLCB0aHJlZSBwaW4g
cGx1Zy1pbiBkZXZpY2UgZm9yIFRlbiBUZWMgQ2VudHVyeSAyMSwgTW9kZWwg
NTcwLg0KV29yazo2MDItOTY4LTYyNDEgeCA0NzQNCkhvbWU6NjAyLTg5OC05
MTU4DQpUaGFua3MgJiA3My0gUmljaw==
Rick Checketts             [e-mail]
Technical Support Engineer Voice:1-800-426-1194 x474
Jensen Tools               Int'l/AZ:602-968-6241 x474
7815 South 46 Street       FAX:[phone]
Phoenix, AZ 85044          Int'l/AZ:602-431-9173
[e-mail], CET, ISA, SCTE, AFSMI
Opinions are my own, not that of my employer.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"-Einstien


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!news.tele.fi!news.funet.fi!mordred.cc.jyu.fi!tukki!pjka
From: [e-mail] (Pertti Karppinen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need info on: SEEC T-1200 A
Date: 16 Sep 1995 00:58:35 +0300
Organization: University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
Lines: 25
Sender: [e-mail]
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tukki.cc.jyu.fi
Disclaimer: Some of these ideas may not be mine.
Peruutus: Jotkut ideat saattavat olla muiden.


Would anybody happen to have a circuit diagram and/or service manual
for the handheld in question? (Here is the complete data on the rig:

Manufacturer: Sanwa Electric Engineering Co. LTD. (Yokohama Japan)
Type:         SEEC T-1200 A
              2m/FM Tranceiver
)

If anybody does I would like here from You.


--
\begin{stquote}
We [Doctors and Bartenders] both get the same two kinds of
customers -- the living and the dying.
    -- Dr. Boyce, "The Menagerie" ("The Cage"), stardate unknown.
\end{stquote}
--
|Pertti Karppinen, Student of Computer Science,           |'Bridge Players |
|Mathematics department, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland |      Do        |
|Email: [e-mail] URL: http://www.jyu.fi/~pjka/         |      It        |
|HAM: OH6KTR QTH: KP22UF                                  | on the Table'  |




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:10 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: RS HTX-202 Warning!
From: [e-mail] (Clint Bradford)
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!wwswinc!clint.bradford
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 95 10:59:00 -0500
Organization: WoodyWare Software, Inc. - 516-736-6662
Lines: 21

Subject: RS HTX-202 Warning!

>>Radio Shack should include this warning with the very poor instruction
>>book they include with their HTX-202, which I understand is mfg. for
>>them by Icom in Korea: never plug your 202 into the cigar lighter with
>>your 12-volt+ battery UNLESS you're using an external antenna
>>(like a mag-mount).

Darn...I've been doing this for over a year, with NO problems
whatsoever. I regularly run the HTX-202 on 12VDC with both the standard
antenna and a Diamond RH77CA.

NO - the unit is NOT built by Icom.

And, finally - never use absolutes.


Clint Bradford
---
 * TLX v4.00 * Time flies like wind.  Fruit flies like pears.
 ■ wcECHO 4.1 ≈ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details ■ Mira Loma, CA ■ 909-681-6221


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!swidir.switch.ch!newsfeed.ACO.net!aci.cvut.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!cs.felk.cvut.cz!XJANDA
From: [e-mail] (JIRI JANDA - OK1XRF)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: I NEED MODS FOR IC-Z1E !!!
Date: 19 Sep 1995 12:45:34 GMT
Organization: Czech Technical University
Lines: 14
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43me1e$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.felk.cvut.cz

Hi OMs,

I bought new dualband handheld from Icom : IC-Z1E. I need some information
about another modification (hardware) bcoz keyboard combination of
B,#+Power On, doesn't work. Is necessary to wipe out some parts (diodes) or
switch some jumper pads ????

THANX FOR ANY INFORMATIONS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM......

Please E-Mail me, if you know how to solve this problem......

E-Mail: [e-mail]

Bye !


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!news.dfw.net!fw37.dfw.net!user
From: [e-mail] (Wayne Day)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Icom IC706?
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 23:21:14 -0500
Organization: The Day Organization
Lines: 25
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <43n63v$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fw37.dfw.net
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17125 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86682

In article <43n63v$[e-mail]>, Alf Green <alf> wrote:

> Has anyone actually got their hands on one of these beasts yet? I am on the
> list at the local emporium, but it seems they won't be here until mid-October.
>
> I got the impression from GJ4ICD's page that they were already available in
> Europe. Anyone over there confirm this? How about elsewhere in the world?
>
> I'd be interested in hearing any comments about this unit before I take
> delivery.

Got to play with the demo at Ham-Com in June for just a little bit, and am
in serious lust!  The environment was RF dirty, and the antenna support
was limited to HF/6m receive only and a 2m quarter wave at the booth, but
it sure sounded great there on the headphones.

73 Wayne KF5ZC

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wayne Day KF5ZC  Fort Worth,Texas,USA                          |
   CompuServe: 76703,376   Internet: [e-mail]   |  ,__o
    or                     Internet: [e-mail]               |--\_<,
   Member: Bicycle Mobile Hams of America                       (*)/'(*)
 For info on BMHA or the BIKEHAM mailing list: Finger [e-mail]
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!cobra.uni.edu!conklinrf
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Duplexor tuning?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Sep 95 23:54:05 -0500
References: <43mnjr$[e-mail]>
Organization: University of Northern Iowa
Lines: 64

In article <43mnjr$[e-mail]>, "Alan K. Adamson" <ne1h> writes:
>
> It seems there are two schools of thought on the topic.  One says always do it
> with a spectrun/tracking analyzer/tracking generator, the other says use a watt
> meter and signal source at the installation source and tune for max power on
> pass and min signal on notch.

That must be the 'plexer I bought last summer- really melted the hell out of
the teflon insulator!  This is probably why there is a sticker on most cans
saying !!WARNING!! do not tune with "REAL" power.

>
> It seems this discussion can get very religious, but what the heck.
>
> I for one favor the analyzer approach, as touchy as the new small cans are
> these days I would not want to try the other approach, but the advocates there
> claim that you have to have the actual load to really tune the cans correctly.

For notch only type 'plexers, a signal generator (a few microvolts, NOT 100
frickin' watts), and a receiver does as well as anything (maybe a couple of 3db
pads or the alike to match the generator to the can and the can to the
receiver).

For the commercial people, notch plexers give 0.5 or so uv  sensitivity for
12db SINAD, and only take their 100 watt transmitter down to 60-65 watts, so
they are happy.

For us "amateurs" who want 12db at 0.15uv, and want to see 80 or more watts of
our PA's 100 at the antenna, need pass/reject cans- which is where the tuning
need is critical.

From experience, and testimonials from hams and commercial techs there are two
effective methods to tuning pass type cavity filters: 1. The conventional
analyzer with tracking generator method, or 2. A cheaper narrow band method
that for some reason few utilize.

By far the easiest, most effective, and yes the cheapest when buying equipment
way to tune pass cavities is with a return loss bridge.  Eagle's device detects
very small changes in return loss (a.k.a. SWR) therby alerting the operator to
the peak pass point (min. SWR) for a device within a very small error.
Typically a 10 degree movement in a threaded tuning rod exhibits a detectable
change in return loss, where the "tune for maximum pass" school can only offer
30-90 degree (or worse!) turns in the rod for visible change in the output
level.

Yes, this is for the truly finicky- but when results count......

For equipment, all one needs is 1)signal generator capable of a couple of
microvolts (-100dbm or so) 2)a narrow-band receiver for each pass frequency,
with some sort of signal reading (s-meter, or better yet a Sinad meter)
3)a precision 50 ohm load (no Radio Shack junk here), 4)Cables, 5)Return loss
bridge.  Not that I make any money... but Eagle's device is quite good for $350
or so you get coverage from 1Mhz-1Ghz.

Much better than the never-found "holy grail" of a DC-1G HP analyzer at a
hamfest (working!) for $350 (not to mention the need for a tracking gen).


=====================================================================
Chris Conklin
N0PAV, 444.65Mhz, Cedar Falls  IA

Please send rants/raves/flames/questions to:: [e-mail]
=====================================================================


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.azstarnet.com!news.cais.net!wb3ffv!blkcat.blkcat.com!f41.n109.z1.fidonet.org!f42.n109.z1.fidonet.org!fforum.blkcat.com!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 23:56:00 -0400
From: [e-mail] (Timothy Cadigan)
Subject: tuning up a kenwood ts520
Message-ID: <NOMSGID_1=3A109=[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
X-Comment-To: (Simon_backer)
Organization: Net 109 Fidonet<->Internet gateway
Lines: 11
X-Gateway: FIDOGATE 3.9.3

Simon,
If you send me an address I'll send you a xerox of the
rec tune up section from the service manual.  My 520 was
getting weak in the ears.  I ckecked the voltage on the transistors
(easy to do, lots of room) and found a transistor with low
voltage.  Cut it out, replaced it with a Radio Shack one, and
all was well!  Great rig.
Tim Cadigan, SJ
[e-mail]
or
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsie.dmc.com!news.iii.net!news
From: [e-mail] (christopher shustak)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood 241, Icom 2000H or Yaesu 2500.  Bad points?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 01:05:47 GMT
Organization: The ParkComm Group
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <43npdu$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: parkcomm.iii.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.2

I am considering a replacement for an old Kenwood 7625.  Can anyone
provide bad news or dislikes for the above three radios?  I'm familiar
with the features and bragging points.


Thanks
Chris N1AUP


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!alpha.sky.net!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: What to buy TNC
Date: 20 Sep 1995 01:40:41 GMT
Organization: SkyNET Corporation
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <43nrep$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip002.sky.net
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

 Hello there.

       I live in the Kansas City area.Im looking for a TNC.I would like to get a kam 3 but will consider other
brands of tnc.If you got one for sale let me know at  [e-mail] me the price that you want for it
too.Thanks
                                                        KB0MAI


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:17 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <[e-mail]> <43mg1u$[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 01:47:25 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <43mg1u$[e-mail]> Zack Lau <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>I plan to publish a 2M to 6 meter transverter design in QEX.
>However, no circuit boards will be available unless someone
>else designs them.  After all, QEX is an experimenter's
>exchange published by the ARRL. I think circuit boards
>discourage experimentation.

I disagree to an extent, Zack. I think circuit boards can
facilitate experimentation since it's often easier to modify
a circuit board than to design and fabricate your own from
scratch. That's not always true, but like working with ICs
rather than discretes, its often true that having some of
the donkey work already done tends to encourage experiments.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco Service Problems
Date: 20 Sep 1995 02:00:31 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 14
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43oalv$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)

I have had some very poor and unusual experiences with the Alinco repair
and service department.   One radio has been back to Alinco 5 (five) times
for the same problem.   Have been twice promised a new replacement radio.
 First promise fell through completely.  Got same radio back with same
problems.   Second promise (for a 582) also fell through and received a
'new' (?) 580 wrapped in a plastic bag.   The new Executive Vice President
 (Taka) refused to take my phone call.   Much more to the story.  Many UPS
trips, letters and phone calls full of empty promises.    Any other
experiences out there?   How would one start up an internet mailing list
or forum for Alinco product users to correspond with each other concerning
their experiences, both good and bad, and to discuss Alinco products,
features, etc, etc,.....    Thanks in advance for your input.
Rick Crider   KD4FXA
Monroe  NC


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:20 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!amdahl.com!netcomsv!uucp3.netcom.com!lafn.org!lafn.org!aq220
From: [e-mail] (Saul Acalinas)
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT-530 NICAD battery pack...HOW TO OPEN?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lafn.org
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Saul Acalinas)
Organization: The Los Angeles Free-Net
References: <orbelld-1409950910420001@204.41.1.203>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 02:22:29 GMT
Lines: 27


In a previous article, [e-mail] (David Orbell) says:

>From the informative messages in this forum, I've come to the conclusion
>that I've got a bad cell in my NICAD 7.2 volt battery pack.
>
>Has anyone had any experience in opeing the battery packs from a FT-530?
>Can it be done in such a way, so that you can get it back together..... so
>that it will still attach properly to the FT-530?
>
>I've noticed a "third party" 12 volt cells for the Yaesu FT-530 by
>Periphex, for a more reasonable price..about 30% cheaper.  Has anyone ever
>tried this product?
>
>
>Dave
>VE3RRN
>
I read in a FAQ about putting the FT-530 pack in the freezer and freezing
the pack.  It stated that the pack is glued together and by freezing and
giving the pack a good smack usually gives a clean break at the glue line.
I haven't had the need to try this yet, but I'm sure I will since I own
two FT-530.

        Saul
        KE6MHP



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!news.citynet.net!news
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Surplus R-508, et al, value - help
Date: 20 Sep 1995 03:31:12 GMT
Organization: Bailey Computer Systems
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <43o1u0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp159a.citynet.net
X-Newsreader: AIR News 3.X (SPRY, Inc.)

As part of an estate I'm attempting to partially liquidate, I've been given
four surplus military receivers marked variously R-15, R-18, R-508 and R-509.
They are in conditions from fair to great. They are marked 118 to 136 MHz, 28
V. What is their value? Anyone here interested?

Thanks!

..de Rob WM8S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bailey, WM8S ([e-mail])                   Kanawha / Charleston
Bailey Computer Systems              Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!usenet
From: "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 20 Sep 1995 04:08:11 GMT
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43o43b$[e-mail]>
References: <43d9jv$[e-mail]> <43de1f$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Tom, Lets put it in production. There is a market for them in Finland and
South America :>)

Bob KG7D



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!nwnews.wa.com!news1.halcyon.com!chinook!ki7zd
From: [e-mail] (Randy Seacat)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Need Info: Collins COL - 52286
Date: 20 Sep 1995 06:32:49 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43ocih$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chinook.halcyon.com


Looking for ANY info on the COllins Col-52286 Trans.
One was found at a yard sale, and we are not sure how the heck to get it
on the air.

Any info would be GREAT!

Thanks.

[e-mail]


--
/-/-/  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  | Amateur Radio Station                       Inet: [e-mail]
  | KI7ZD
  | WWA  CN87  73's    _._ .. __... __.. _..   "If RST > 519, Reduce Power!"


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!news.dfn.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!moritz
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Looking for first handheld, suggestions?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 07:18:46 GMT
Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43of8m$[e-mail]>
References: <43fo47$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ipers1.e-technik.uni-stuttgart.de
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17127 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86685

>So if anyone has any suggestions, please email me..
>[e-mail]

Hi Scott,

May be the best suggestion is, not to get a hand held at all. You may soon
find that its range and usefulness is rather limited and that you had spent
better the cash on an decent s/h mobile radio. Before investing money into
a twinbander you should enquire about the level of 70 cm activity in your
area. A large number of folks do have 70, but never used it.

73, Moritz DL5UH




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!nwfocus.wa.com!calvino.alaska.net!usenet
From: Jeremy Lansman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Selling to Unlicensed (wa
Date: 20 Sep 1995 07:35:21 GMT
Organization: KYES-(TV)
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <43og7p$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <42v2pb$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <432lgc$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anc-p2-71.alaska.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Gary:

  Haven't you noticed the spectrum auctions?  Do you know many people
thing the winners own the spectrum they pay for?

    Jeremy Lansman



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Rfrans)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Cleaning of Equipment...Advice please...
Date: 20 Sep 1995 08:13:58 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 15
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43p0i6$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Rfrans)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I just acquired a complete Heathkit SB-101A setup... filthy dirty on the
inside...looks like someone was sawing wood above it at some point...lots
of sawdust in side on the circuit boards...works great, but I would like
to know if their are any techniques for cleaning inside?  Is it safe to
use the air hose at a gas station if kept at a safe distance? Or is just a
vacumn ok for the task?  Obviously, I don't want to harm the delicate
circuit boards...!

Any advice would be great!

Thanks,

Rob Frans
KC8BAP
Grand Rapids, MI


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!simtel!news.kei.com!intac!sailboar!jeff.sumberg
From: [e-mail] (JEFF SUMBERG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 10:47:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: The SailBoard BBS * Ringwood, NJ, USA * [phone]
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JEFF SUMBERG)
References: <43li5k$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 19

JO>From: [e-mail] (John Olson)
  >Message-ID: <43li5k$[e-mail]>

JO>  Drew: The HTX-202 is ok for normal voice communications, BUT IF you
  >have any aspirations of running packet with it - FORGET IT! It's JUNK.

No way. I use mine for packet, and I know many others who do too,
several of which are in permanent packet duty.

It's a good radio, and worth every penny of the current $199 price.

--
-=======================================================================-
| 73 de N2VYU, Jeff, in Ringwood New Jersey  (Fn21)                     |
| Email: [e-mail] ** Packet: N2VYU @ WA2SNA.NJ.USA.NA |
| Advanced class - WAC on RTTY - Ramapo Mountain Amateur Radio Club     |
-=======================================================================-

 * 1st 2.00 #32s * .


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:28 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!EU.net!sun4nl!geertj
From: [e-mail] (Geert Jan de Groot)
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: belegen.ripe.net
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News at news)
Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
References: <[e-mail]> <43mg1u$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 12:16:46 GMT
Lines: 29

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) writes:

>In article <43mg1u$[e-mail]> Zack Lau <[e-mail]> writes:
>>I plan to publish a 2M to 6 meter transverter design in QEX.
>>However, no circuit boards will be available unless someone
>>else designs them.  After all, QEX is an experimenter's
>>exchange published by the ARRL. I think circuit boards
>>discourage experimentation.

>I disagree to an extent, Zack. I think circuit boards can
>facilitate experimentation since it's often easier to modify
>a circuit board than to design and fabricate your own from
>scratch. That's not always true, but like working with ICs
>rather than discretes, its often true that having some of
>the donkey work already done tends to encourage experiments.

2M / 6M is a range on which dead bug (uglyboard) works very well.
Alternatively, you may want to go this way and tell about it
more explicit. Uglyboard is faster than a regular PCB, no messy
chemicals, and easy experimenting.
It might be a good way to show how this stuff can be built so
it would actually work. All it takes is unetched PCB.

IMHO, it would be *very* appropiate to show people how they can
construct their own circuits easily without those
nasty PCB layout problems.

Geert Jan
(who discarded his etching materials several years ago)


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!jms
From: [e-mail] (Mike Stansberry)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Cleaning of Equipment...Advice please...
Date: 20 Sep 1995 13:37:20 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <43p5eg$[e-mail]>
References: <43p0i6$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mssjms.col.hp.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Rfrans ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I just acquired a complete Heathkit SB-101A setup... filthy dirty on the
: inside...looks like someone was sawing wood above it at some point...lots
: of sawdust in side on the circuit boards...works great, but I would like
: to know if their are any techniques for cleaning inside?  Is it safe to
: use the air hose at a gas station if kept at a safe distance? Or is just a
: vacumn ok for the task?  Obviously, I don't want to harm the delicate
: circuit boards...!

: Any advice would be great!

Well, if it were mine--  The air pressure at typical gas stations is quite
high.  If you use it, be very careful.  If the crud isn't stuck on too
tight, you might try using a vacuum cleaner, but with the hose connected
on the air output side.  You can do this with a many vacuum cleaners.
Then, by using the 'wand' attachment, the one that pinches down to a
small opening, you can get enought pressure to blow off dirt, etc. without
any damage.  If the stuff is stuck too tight to blow off, what I do
is to wash the equipment.  First with 'Formula 409' cleaner and a small
brush to loosen the really bad spots, then rinsed very well with water,
allowed to 'drip dry', then I dry it for a day or so in a 50 degree C
heat box.  You must not soak any paper items, such as as dial scale and
it's not good to direct water at an unsealed power transformer.  Of course,
I have a 'wash booth' and a 'heat box' available at work, so it's easy
for me to do this.  But it does work.

Good luck, de Mike, K0TER



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:31 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!hades.omen.com.au!news
From: Tony Preston <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC-737/736/738 MODS
Date: 20 Sep 1995 14:21:03 GMT
Organization: Omen Computer Services, Perth, Western Australia
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43p80f$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tonymac.omen.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Hi,

If you know of any mods for the IC-737/736/738, or any site which has
mods for these radios, please can you let me know?

Many thanks & 73's,

Tony




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!hades.omen.com.au!news
From: Tony Preston <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM Mods
Date: 20 Sep 1995 14:23:33 GMT
Organization: Omen Computer Services, Perth, Western Australia
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43p855$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tonymac.omen.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
To: newspost:rec.radio.amateur.equipment
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Hi

Do you know of any mods for the ICOM IC-737/736/738 transceivers? Please
can you send them to me, or tell me where I might find them on the NET?

Many thanks and 73's

Tony




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Steve kn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: source for MC3362
Date: 20 Sep 1995 14:44:59 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 11
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43pnfb$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve kn)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I'm looking for the MC3362 single chip receiver chip and the LM6321 buffer
opamp.
Question:  Does any one know of a source which carries this chip.  If the
chip is unavailable, is there an upgraded chip with a new manufactuers
part
number?  Hopefully they still have the chip (or similar one with the same
pin
outs).  Any help is appreaciated :)
please reply via E-mail.

Thanks de Steve, KD1EN


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!fc.hp.com!jer
From: [e-mail] (Jer/ Eberhard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help me out on 5km cordless phone
Date: 20 Sep 1995 15:42:21 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WCSO/CSL, Ft Collins, Colo, USA
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43pcot$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: jerslash.fc.hp.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Starry Hung ([e-mail]) wrote:
> Hi,

> I am new to this newsgroup and hope you experts giving some suggestions
> for my 5km cordless phone.  I can't find many information from the
> manual, but understand it is in the UHF band and having communication
> range of 5km in optimal condition.  Of course, my environment is too
> bad (many obstacles, near high voltage line, and many buildings around),
> and the effective communication range is less than 500 meters! (indoor)


It may have been a typo that says...  ".5km", which IS 500 meters.  It
is UNLIKELY that the phone will operate beyond 500 meters, as it was not
designed to...  Just think of all the cordless phones out there and the
likelihood that two people within 5km would have the same
make/model/frequency.

--
Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, [e-mail], 970 229-2861 OFFICE, 970 229-3598 FAX
Hewlett-Packard, 3404 East Harmony Rd MS-E8, Ft Collins, CO  80525-9599
C-182 N182H, CFII Airplane & Glider, FAA Denver FSDO Aviation Safety Counselor
CO-CAP Group 2 Cmdr, MSN CheckPilot, PP218 HAM N0FZD, 29 Young Eagles Flown!


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Simon Ho )
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Want to rent ICOM equipment
Date: 20 Sep 1995 16:46:44 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <43pghk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sj12-04.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Sep 20  9:46:44 AM PDT 1995

Can anyone give me some info or pointers where I can rent some ICOM
equipments to do some short-term testing.  Bay area of California would
be most best for me.

Thanks in advance.

Simon Ho






From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:36 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!ftpbox!mothost!schbbs!pla1970.comm.mot.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Don Burns)
Subject: ICOM 735 on 160?
Organization: Motorola RNSG
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:03:07 -0400
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (SCHBBS News Account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 145.2.100.52
Lines: 11

Am interested in hearing opinions from those who have experience with the
Icom 735 on 160 meters.  Pro and Cons, I'd like to hear them.
Tks.

--
Don Burns           K4GHD        \    Motorola E-Mail: epur01
Motorola Inc.                     \    Internet:[e-mail]
North American Radio Systems Divn  \     Voice: 954-723-5518
Plantation, FL  U.S.A.              \      Fax: [phone]

X.400: /c=us/admd=attmail/prmd=motorola/g=don/s=burns/ddt=id/ddv=epur01/


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!news.eden.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: [e-mail] (Neil L. Chavigny)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: COLLINS ANYTHING WTB
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:33:26 -0700
Organization: Radio Ranch
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <neil-2009951733270001@199.171.21.216>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net-1-216.eden.com

I am looking for any and all Colliins amatuer gear that ever was. Any
condition is welcome. Particulary the 51s1 reciever. If any of this stuff
is littering your shack drop me a line. Thanks, Neil


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!newspump.wustl.edu!gumby!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.itd.umich.edu!gorf.rs.itd.umich.edu!jartz
From: [e-mail] (Jason Nathaniel Artz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Question about my TH-79A
Date: 20 Sep 1995 18:02:17 GMT
Organization: University of Michigan
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <43pkv9$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gorf.rs.itd.umich.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hi there.   I own a Kenwood TH 79A, and I left my instruction manual at
home, 2000 miles away.  Could someone please tell me the difference
between the two 'DUP' modes?  When I press F+DUP once, The word 'DUP'
appears in the display.  When I press it a second time, DUP begins
flashing.  When I press it a third time, DUP goes away.  What is the
difference between the regular DUP mode and the flashing DUP mode?  I
detected a drop in audio output during the flashing mode.. but I can't
remember what the actual, functional difference is.

Please respond to me via e-mail!  Thanks and 73 from ke6mhv

--
@@@
Jason N. Artz
email: [e-mail]            University of Michigan,
Braindead Bassoonist                    Ann Arbor
###


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.flint.umich.edu!news.gmi.edu!msunews!news.mtu.edu!news.mtu.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Tony Dal Santo)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Transmit Video on CATV 60??
Date: 20 Sep 1995 18:56:20 -0400
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <43q66k$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: heckle.tc.mtu.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I'm looking for a device that takes video (and optionally audio) in, and
transmits it on the 440Mhz band.  I think it can then be picked up if
the tv is tuned to cable channel 60.  Does anyone know where I can
buy such a critter, or where to get a design to build it?  Email
replies would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Tony Dal Santo


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!psgrain!news.tek.com!usenet
From: Len Gibbs <lengibbs>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: New Yaseu HT?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 19:18:50 GMT
Organization: Tektronix
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <43ppeq$[e-mail]>
References: <43cv45$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc146655.bv.tek.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; U; 16bit)

[e-mail] (Kirk James Smith) wrote:
>Does anyone have any info on the new Yaseu single-band "mil spec" (for
>target practice?) HTs that I see on the back page of October QST?  They
>look interesting.
>
>Is DCS compatable with DPL (same thing, or some weird ham bastardization?)?
>Fast scan speed = ? channels per second?
>
>I've sworn off buying ham gear after getting tired of the quality (I own
>Icom and Alinco [the Alinco is better than the Icom!]), and use Motorola
>at work...but this Yaseu COULD make me reconsider.



Up here in Beaverton, we use Icom ht's for deep sea fishing...We seem to
get quite a lot of Cal Poly Tuna. Have you seen those things...?

Hey how are you doing?  Other people will see this posting and think I'm
wierd..oh well...

Len
KE6BGT



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!uwvax!news
From: Scott Ellington <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Repeater Battery Indicator
Date: 20 Sep 1995 19:56:03 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <43prkk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: snet47.ssec.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

A ZL friend of mine is looking for a way to remotely read out the
battery voltage of a mountain-top solar powered repeater.  I wonder
if there is a device which, for example, could be interrogated with
a DTMF code, would read the output of a DVM or A/D converter, and
transmit (cw, voice synthesizer, digital, etc.) the results.  Perhaps
some of the commercial repeater controller have such a feature.

Any suggestions?  Please reply by email.

73,

Scott  K9MA
[e-mail]




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!bighorn.accessnv.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Squeak Porray)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Cleaning of Equipment...Advice please...
Date: 20 Sep 1995 21:10:54 -0700
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <43qoke$[e-mail]>
References: <43p0i6$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Rfrans ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I just acquired a complete Heathkit SB-101A setup... filthy dirty on the
: inside...looks like someone was sawing wood above it at some point...lots
: of sawdust in side on the circuit boards...works great, but I would like
: to know if their are any techniques for cleaning inside?  Is it safe to
: use the air hose at a gas station if kept at a safe distance? Or is just a
: vacumn ok for the task?  Obviously, I don't want to harm the delicate
: circuit boards...!

: Any advice would be great!

: Thanks,

: Rob Frans
: KC8BAP
: Grand Rapids, MI

Compressed air, in moderation (i.e., not enough force to physically blow
parts off the boards) is fine ... so is application of a general purpose
cleaner like "409" followed by light scrubbing with an old toothbrush or
stiff-bristled paintbrush. Vacuum cleaners typically don't have enough
air volume to do the job. Those boards aren't as delicate as you might
imagine!
73, and good luck,
  "Squeak", AD7K
   Manager AES/Las Vegas



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!DIALix!brisbane.DIALix.oz.au!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Murray Kelly)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: DR 112 on 220?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 21:48:48 +1000
Organization: DIALix Services, Brisbane, Australia.
Lines: 16
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43ov30$qf8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: [e-mail]
Keywords: DR 112 220MHz

One of the buttons on the DR112 failed and after attention to it
I idly checked all the others behind the front plate just to save
myself a trip back. I did not notice until too late that there is
an extra one between the 'call' button and the Mic socket which is
labelled 'reset'. The power was off but the readout flashed.

On power-up, the VFO now tuned 220-224. Nothing on 144. We do not
have an allocation on 220. Pressing the reset with power on restored
2m to me - I had to set everything!

This information I have never seen anywhere else but is of curiosity
value to me, only. Perhaps the W/K/N stations with a DR112 can make
something more of it?

Cheers. Murray Kelly vk4aok.



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.delphi.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (W8JI  Tom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ-422B Keyer & TS-440?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 22:20:25 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 60
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43qi59$[e-mail]>
References: <43q4l3$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43q4l3$[e-mail]>, "Tom C. Brown, Jr."
<[e-mail]> writes:

>
>I have an MFJ 422B and I use it almost exclusively with an Icom, although

>which Icom varies.....sometimes a 728 and sometimes a 725, and I have
>never had the problem that was described here.  I'm with you, and think
>the 422B referred to is broke!  Sounds like an open output transistor to
>me, or something like that....of course I have not looked at the diagram
>and I don't know if the direct output is a discrete device or a chip.....
>
>I'll tell ya....that is one thing that I REALLY like about my good ol'
>bugs.....the fact that you DO get a real, physical, contact closure! <g>

>I enjoy the 422B as well, but I confess that the main reason I got it was

>to provide a usable sidetone while operating the Icom 725 and 728.  The
>sidetone provided by either one of those (otherwise fine) rigs is all but

>worthless.
>
>The 422B is sure a nice piece of gear isn't it?
>
>73
>
>Tom KJ5IE

Hi Tom,

I'm with you 100 percent, I think the poor guy just had a bad component or
connection. I don't know why it was recommended he modify a perfectly
proper design instead of repairing the problem!

I wasn't going to say anything but I hated to see a huge technical
distortion ...errr, I mean discussion .... explaining why the transistor
output design could never work reliably when it obviously can and does. It
was kind'a like recommending someone with a flat tire re-design his car
and to eliminate the troublesome wheels!

Perhaps someone confused VBE (sat) and VCE (sat) and thinks the collector
can never go below .7 volts in a conventional bipolar silicon transistor.

Anyway, my 422 keyer uses a MPSA42 keying transistor. That device is
speced to have a worse case, worse device *MAXIMUM*  of .5 volts VCE at 20
mA collector current (2 mA of base current), but the *TYPICAL* MPSA42 VCE
is 1/10th volt at 20 mA collector current!

I actually measured the closed key voltage across the direct output of my
422. My 422 pulls the ICOM key line to within .039 volts and the Kenwood
line to within .057 volts of ground!!!!!!  That sure seems low enough to
me.

On a lighter note (get it?) I reworked the sidetone of my ICOM 751A, and
moved the carrier offset on CW. I like a 400 to 500 Hz tone, not that
squeeky nerve-grating tone they give you from the factory. It involved
changing several resistors and capacitors and was a real chore. So I feel
your side-tone pain.

73 Tom W8JI


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.delphi.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!felix.TECLink.net!usenet
From: "Tom C. Brown, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: MFJ-422B Keyer & TS-440?
Date: 20 Sep 1995 22:29:55 GMT
Organization: TECLink Internet Services: [e-mail]
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <43q4l3$[e-mail]>
References: <43ft97$[e-mail]> <43k4ke$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc1_10.teclink.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Hi Tom-

I have an MFJ 422B and I use it almost exclusively with an Icom, although
which Icom varies.....sometimes a 728 and sometimes a 725, and I have
never had the problem that was described here.  I'm with you, and think
the 422B referred to is broke!  Sounds like an open output transistor to
me, or something like that....of course I have not looked at the diagram
and I don't know if the direct output is a discrete device or a chip.....

I'll tell ya....that is one thing that I REALLY like about my good ol'
bugs.....the fact that you DO get a real, physical, contact closure! <g>
I enjoy the 422B as well, but I confess that the main reason I got it was
to provide a usable sidetone while operating the Icom 725 and 728.  The
sidetone provided by either one of those (otherwise fine) rigs is all but
worthless.

The 422B is sure a nice piece of gear isn't it?

73

Tom KJ5IE




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!nwnews.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Gary P. Fiber)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Repeater Battery Indicator
Date: 21 Sep 1995 01:34:07 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43qfef$[e-mail]>
References: <43prkk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm10-ip18.halcyon.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.1

In article <43prkk$[e-mail]>, Scott Ellington <[e-mail]> says:
>
>A ZL friend of mine is looking for a way to remotely read out the
>battery voltage of a mountain-top solar powered repeater.  I wonder
>if there is a device which, for example, could be interrogated with
>a DTMF code, would read the output of a DVM or A/D converter, and
>transmit (cw, voice synthesizer, digital, etc.) the results.  Perhaps
>some of the commercial repeater controller have such a feature.
>
>Any suggestions?  Please reply by email.
>
>73,
>
>Scott  K9MA
>[e-mail]
>
Scott,

TAPR has a device that might fit this. I can not remember the actual Name, but it takes
analog inputs and then you can attach them to a packet controller as I remember.

73' Gary


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: Thomas Foster <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Heathkit DX-20 CW Transmitter
Date: 21 Sep 1995 02:33:27 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43qitn$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-cha-nc1-17.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Sep 20  7:33:27 PM PDT 1995
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1PE (Windows; I; 16bit)

I began ham radio back in 1962 with a Heathkit DX-20 50-watt CW
transmitter and an old Hallicrafters S20R receiver.  Is there anyone who
would like to sell their DX-20?




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:49 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
From: [e-mail] (Clint Bradford)
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!wwswinc!clint.bradford
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 09:33:00 -0500
Organization: WoodyWare Software, Inc. - 516-736-6662
Lines: 25

Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?

>>The HTX-202 is ok for normal voice communications, BUT IF you
>>have any asperations of running packet with it - FORGET IT! It's JUNK.

More horrible, irresponsible advice.

I am currently devoting an HTX-202 to packet 24 hours a day, as my
landline BBS Users access it as a Door.

Sure would like to hear first-hand experiences when it comes to the
HTX-202, not a bunch of mis-stated, anti-Tandy sentiment. The HTX-202 is
a solid, reliable performer. It ain't pretty to look at...it doesn't
have 500 channels...it doesn't require a mangifying glass to
maneuver the controls...and I cannot listen to cellular telephone calls
on it, either.

But it performs as it is advertised it will - and it does it
excellently.


Clint Bradford
---
 * TLX v4.00 * ATTENTION to Details AMATEUR RADIO BBS - 909/681-6221
 ■ wcECHO 4.1 ≈ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details ■ Mira Loma, CA ■ 909-681-6221


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!inet.d48.lilly.com!ga19989
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 21 Sep 95 10:17:47 EST
References: <43o7vl$[e-mail]>
Distribution: world
Organization: LRL, Lilly Research Laboratories
Lines: 14

Supposedly a demo model at local shop here in Indy

Icom folks gave me a 1300 dollar estimate at Dayton..

Not sure of duty cycle

Mel KJ9C

In article <43o7vl$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (pmy ) writes:
> I saw an ad in the latest QST for this dream rig.  Nobody seems to have
> it in stock yet.  Anybody know the street price for this rig?  Is it
> 100% duty-cycle?
>
>


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.drexel.edu!news.ge.com!ctrlnews.erie.ge.com!news.crd.ge.com!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.cerf.net!pagesat.net!a3bsrv.nai.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Brian Ellsworth)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: What to buy TNC
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 10:44:15 GMT
Organization: North American Internet Company
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <43rggh$[e-mail]>
References: <43nrep$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] wrote:


>       I live in the Kansas City area.Im looking for a TNC.I would like to get a kam 3 but will consider other
>brands of tnc.If you got one for sale let me know at  [e-mail] me the price that you want for it
>
Is Kantronics still ripping hams off by selling products that are
totally incompatible with after market products? (like modems,
software, etc.)  Seems to me that for years hams bought kpc-2's
thinking they were getting a good deal only to find out later when
everyone else was upgrading with tapr or g3ruf or k9ng modems that
their kpc-2's were stuck at 1200 baud forever.

Just wondering....

-be




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.cerf.net!pagesat.net!a3bsrv.nai.net!mgate.arrl.org!news
From: Zack Lau <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Date: 21 Sep 1995 13:13:40 GMT
Organization: American Radio Relay League
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <43roe4$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43mg1u$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mgate.arrl.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)

[e-mail] (Gary Coffman) wrote:
>In article <43mg1u$[e-mail]> Zack Lau <[e-mail]> writes:
>>
>>I plan to publish a 2M to 6 meter transverter design in QEX.
>>However, no circuit boards will be available unless someone
>>else designs them.  After all, QEX is an experimenter's
>>exchange published by the ARRL. I think circuit boards
>>discourage experimentation.
>
>I disagree to an extent, Zack. I think circuit boards can
>facilitate experimentation since it's often easier to modify
>a circuit board than to design and fabricate your own from
>scratch. That's not always true, but like working with ICs
>rather than discretes, its often true that having some of
>the donkey work already done tends to encourage experiments.

I see your point, but since I can't supply circuit boards
(HQ staffers can't run amateur related businesses), I
prefer to leave QST page space open for others to fill.

I'm still waiting for an Internet PCB layout standard to
evolve.  In fact, few hams other than myself seem to be
distributing Net compatible layouts in *any* form.  I'm
currently generating Postscript files using HiWire, a
CAD program by Wintek, but suspect I ought to switch over
to Autocad to gain the flexibility of generating things
like properly dimensioned rat race microwave mixers.

Zack KH6CP/1  [e-mail]

Anyone monitoring VT broadcast stations for tropo
openings??  Like to know what evenings to activate
FN33KE/KD on 432 to 10 GHz.




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!daily-planet.execpc.com!earth.execpc.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Terry Hubbard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu SSB filter?
Date: 21 Sep 1995 13:29:14 -0500
Organization: Exec-PC
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <43satq$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: earth.execpc.com

I can tell you that IRCI has not and is not shipping filters for months
now due to a problem with agent or manufacturer in japan.




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!seas.smu.edu!!omega!rpo3352
From: rpo3352@omega (Paul Opitz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: battery cover plate for HTX-202
Date: 21 Sep 1995 13:50:15 GMT
Organization: University of Texas Arlington
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <43rqin$[e-mail]>
References: <41nnas$[e-mail]> <41p0ga$[e-mail]> <428pq4$[e-mail]> <42a5p8$[e-mail]> <42lcug$[e-mail]> <43ied4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: omega.uta.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

[e-mail] wrote:

: i was in the habit of taking the battery pack off when operating with external DC,
: because i measured whatever voltage was going in the top, coming out the bottom.
: Is there a diode in the nicad battery to prevent overcharging the battery with external
: DC going in the top?
: -------------------------------------------------
: [e-mail]
: Chris Mallam, B.A., VA3CME
: Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
: OS/2: Drag me, drop me, make me feel like an object!
: http://infoweb.magi.com/~cmallam/INDEX.HTML
: BBS: 613.241.9750

There is a diode that prevents charging at all from the DC jack.

Paul Opitz
Radio Shack Publications


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news1.digex.net!news3.digex.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Allen Hansen, EEB)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:57:16 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, USA
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43ruip$[e-mail]>
References: <43o7vl$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dcc05226.slip.digex.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (pmy ) wrote:

>I saw an ad in the latest QST for this dream rig.  Nobody seems to have
>it in stock yet.  Anybody know the street price for this rig?  Is it
>100% duty-cycle?

Price is $1299.  Not sure about the duty cycle.  I saw one last night
and it is AMAZING.  I'm going to sell my IC736 and get one of
these little beauties.

Allen


*********************************************************************
*ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT BANK                       Sales- 800 368 3270*
*323 Mill St. N.E.                               Fax-   703 938 6911*
*Vienna, VA  22180                               BBS-   703 938 3781*
*                  Internet: [e-mail]                   *
*                     Compuserve: 73424,1345                        *
*  Amateur Radio, Shortwave Radio, Scanning Radio, Commercial Radio *
*********************************************************************



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:55 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news1.digex.net!news3.digex.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Allen Hansen, EEB)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:57:16 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, USA
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <43ruip$[e-mail]>
References: <43o7vl$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dcc05226.slip.digex.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (pmy ) wrote:

>I saw an ad in the latest QST for this dream rig.  Nobody seems to have
>it in stock yet.  Anybody know the street price for this rig?  Is it
>100% duty-cycle?

Price is $1299.  Not sure about the duty cycle.  I saw one last night
and it is AMAZING.  I'm going to sell my IC736 and get one of
these little beauties.

Allen


*********************************************************************
*ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT BANK                       Sales- 800 368 3270*
*323 Mill St. N.E.                               Fax-   703 938 6911*
*Vienna, VA  22180                               BBS-   703 938 3781*
*                  Internet: [e-mail]                   *
*                     Compuserve: 73424,1345                        *
*  Amateur Radio, Shortwave Radio, Scanning Radio, Commercial Radio *
*********************************************************************



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:56 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!mdisea!mothost!schbbs!news
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Best HT for Handicapped Ham?
Organization: MOTOROLA
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 15:52:46 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (SCHBBS News Account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.188.159.81
Lines: 22

A friend (and new amateur) who has no net access, plans to buy a
2m/70cm HT, and seeks commentary and recommendations on the
following:
        Icom W31 and Z1A
        Yaesu 51R

But there's more relevant information to add, though he would not ...

He has increasing strength and dexterity limitations due to MS, so in
my opinion he should consider also
        a) relative ease of operation (placement and size of controls
           and buttons, etc.)
        b) relative simplicity of operation
        c) other manufacturers and models, perhaps

I do not have good knowledge of the specific models he mentioned
(above), nor do I know what models might be better.

Any recommendations you can offer will be appreciated.

73
Tony  Kc7HDT


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!News.MO.NET!Walden.MO.NET!kninectf
From: [e-mail] (Alan Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: GE Master II Conversion???
Date: 21 Sep 1995 16:37:33 GMT
Organization: -=MO.NET=- P-Net, Inc's Missouri Operations
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <43s4cd$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: walden.mo.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:58 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!csulb.edu!maverick
From: [e-mail] (Hiran C. Fernando)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH-79A (Deluxe) vs. Yaesu FT-51R (HP)
Date: 21 Sep 1995 17:10:58 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <43s6b2$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43i26e$[e-mail]> <43n1q1$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gull.csulb.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Get the Yaesu for the lighted keypad, if nothing else.


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:28:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!scholl
From: scholl@news-server (Rick Scholl)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: hard case for Yaesu FT-51r
Date: 21 Sep 1995 20:50:45 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <43sj75$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.206.48.3
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL0]

I'm looking for a manufacturer that makes a hard leather case for the
Yaesu FT-51R handheld.  Preferably with a swivel belt release.

Yaesu only makes the soft case which is like no protection at all as far
as I'm concerned.  I contacted Bee Electronics but they don't have
anything for the 51r and are not aware as to whether any of their existing
cases would work.

If you know of such a substitution that works or know a company that makes
them please contact me at    [e-mail]
or you can call me by phone or post the answer here.  Thanks!

Rick
--
    | Richard C. Scholl             | Internet: [e-mail]      |
    | Electronic Systems Engineer   | [phone]  FAX [phone] |
    | Milwaukee Public Museum, Inc. | 2 meter/440 Ham Radio: N9EJO       |
    | 800 W. Wells Street           |                                    |
    | Milwaukee, WI  53233          | My opinions are my own!            |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Stephen A. King)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 22:19:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <43sotu$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ir5-13.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Sep 21  3:28:14 PM PDT 1995
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99a.107

[e-mail] (Jim Lowman) wrote:


>: .. The .equipment group is not the place for buying or selling equipment; that's what rec.radio.swap is for."
>
>: Just wanted to clear that up.  ;)
>
>I did not question the content of the charter, just suggested that:
>
>1)  ...rec.radio.swap may not be the most intuitive name for the newsgroup.
>      Lots of users post without reading the charter; some just do not care
>      and

This certainly is not the "best of name" for HAM radio. As another
poster stated, it would be very foolish to think that any conference
with a "radio" in the name would be **only** about HAM radio.

There is a conference called "rec.ham-radio.swap" that I get and there
has **never** been one message in it. I have subscribed to this
conference for over 2 months now, and nothing is ever in it.

>2)  ...that some users, on many newsgroups, take things far too seriously.
>       Posting "for sale" ads on this newsgroup is not the end of the world.

Isn't that the truth!

As another poster stated, with the amount of FS/WTB traffic, the so
called "charter" should change with he "desires" of the users (as is
obvious by the traffic). Of course, that may be too difficult for
those in charge of the conference to understand!





From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:01 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 02:34:07 GMT
Lines: 58

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Arthur Clampitt) writes:
>Question.
>       If the group is for discussion only , why the hell is it not named
>"rec.radio.amateur.equipment.discussion" ??

*All* the rec.radio.amateur.* groups are for discussion ONLY. None are for
buying and selling. It's in the Guide.

>       The current name indicates no such restriction and seems to be the
>ideal place for notices of sale or wants .

Perhaps we should rename the rec.radio.amateur.* groups to the
rec.radio.amateur.NO-BUYING-OR-SELLING.* groups, but even that
probably wouldn't stop the truly clueless. If they won't read
the Guide or the FAQ, why should we expect them to read the
group name.

>       To quote what the "Charter " of the group says is not very helpful , I
>doubt if 1 in 10,000 of the people who look at this group even know of
>the existence of a charter for the group , let alone know what is says
>!

Sad but true, the clueless do rule.

>Comment.
>       Rec.Radio,SWAP ?     I think Mr Spock would say "Illogical Captain"
>for a group to look in for AMATEUR Radio Equipment for SALE ,
>       The group name Rec.radio.swap conjures up (for me at least) a vision
>of Antique broadcast radio collectors swapping vintage valve sets !!!
>       Let us not be so parochial as to think that  Ham radio is the only
>type of recreational radio

Well, that's the idea. The swap group is for swaps, sales, trades, wanted
to buy, etc of *any* kind of radio equipment, including amateur, as well
as scanners, shortwave receivers, CBs, or even antique boat anchors, by
members of those rec.radio.* newsgroups. The idea was to have one marketplace
and get the dang ads out of *all* the main discussion groups for the entire
rec.radio.* hierarchy.

Of course I argued at the time of the Great Renaming that we should
just stay as rec.ham-radio, one big group, and let the users manage
it how they want on their own machines. That's what kill files and
threaded readers are for. But no, we were told that by breaking it
in pieces we'd get rid of the clutter. Fat chance when nobody respects
the hierarchy, and when people *repost* the same stupid article to
every group instead of properly cross-posting. Oh, well, there still
are threaded readers and kill files, regardless, so it probably doesn't
matter much one way or the other. (Except for the reposts, that takes
up extra disk space, I *hate* that.)

And yeah, *this* post is off charter too.  Grumble!

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:02 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!news.ece.uc.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!meaddata!swiss.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.ptd.net!dxis!k2ph
From: [e-mail] (Bob Schreibmaier)
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: QRM Central, Kresgeville, PA
References: <43so8g$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 03:29:41 GMT
Lines: 26

From article <43so8g$[e-mail]>, by [e-mail] (Gary McDuffie Sr):
> [e-mail] (Rick Checketts) writes:
>
>> By the volumn of FS and WTB headers those FYI e-mailers must be busy.
>>Sounds like it's time to change the Charter.
>
> I second that motion.  I took a look over there on r.r.s. and I have
> no interest in reading through all the scanner and cb crap to find ham
> gear.  This looks like the perfect place to post fs/etc ham gear to
> me.

Perhaps someone with the "how to" knowledge and the inclination would
like to post the request for discussion, call for votes, count the
votes, etc.?

BTW, that's not me.  I know nothing, nothing...  8^{)

73,
Bob K2PH

--
+------------------  \-\-\-\  -----------------------------+
| Bob Schreibmaier K2PH | INTERNET: [e-mail] |
| (a.k.a. "The QRPer")  | ICBM:     40o55'N 75o30'W        |
| Kresgeville, PA       | Euthanize the Limbaugh Loonies.  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:03 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!news.uh.edu!news.uth.tmc.edu!admin5.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Date: 22 Sep 1995 09:35:12 -0500
Organization: University of Texas - Houston, General Administration
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <43uhj0$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43mpei$[e-mail]> <43so8g$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: admin5.hsc.uth.tmc.edu

In article <43so8g$[e-mail]>,
Gary McDuffie Sr <[e-mail]> wrote:
>I second that motion.  I took a look over there on r.r.s. and I have
>no interest in reading through all the scanner and cb crap to find ham
>gear.  This looks like the perfect place to post fs/etc ham gear to
>me.

Do you demand that all cb/scanner stuff not show up at your local swapfest,
too?

The idea is that rec.radio.swap is the online swapfest. Just as you can find
lots of different types of electronics at a swapfest, so can you in
rec.radio.swap. If you don't want what a particular seller has on his table
(in his post), then walk past it.

This group was cast as having no forsale posts for a reason: because that
allows sites that prohibit their use for personal monetary gain (and yes,
there are some, primarily in the government) to carry this group and not
carry r.r.s, and thus keep themselves out of trouble. If you insist on
posting for sale messages to this group, those sites will drop it. You may
not like that state of affairs, but it's reality.
--
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
http://k5zc.hsc.uth.tmc.edu       | adequately be explained by stupidity.
            "Keister! I've learned a new word!" -- Wakko Warner
       "And thanks to you, so has half of America." -- Yakko Warner


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:05 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!news.Cerritos.edu!news.Arizona.EDU!nemo!hlester
From: [e-mail] (Howard Lester)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purch
Date: 21 Sep 1995 20:31:59 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Lines: 11
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <43si3v$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43mdd4$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nemo.as.arizona.edu

In article <43mdd4$[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>
>Ditto. Who is it really hurting anyway if a few missguided soles post here?
                                                            ^^^^^

Well, if the shoe fits....



Howard Lester KE7QJ



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:06 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!DIALix!brisbane.DIALix.oz.au!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Murray Kelly)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Mods for Alinco DR-112
Date: 22 Sep 1995 11:47:28 +1000
Organization: DIALix Services, Brisbane, Australia.
Lines: 31
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43t4jg$fcm$[e-mail]>
References: <42nd2h$[e-mail]> <43dejq$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (woodring) writes:

>In article <42nd2h$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] says:
>>
>>I was wondering if any mods are available for this rig.  I realize this is an
>>older rig, however, I just purchased it and would like an answer.
>>Thanks for helping.
>>Bob Werner KC4URW
>>[e-mail]
>>[e-mail]
>>Amateur:  KC4URW@N4QEA.#METN.TN.USA.NA
>>
>cut the wire hanging out of the control panel and then reset radio per manual.
>unit will xmit where it receives.  no 800 mhz coverage with the 112
>73 jim

I posted a finding about the DR112 the other day. I had the front
off to fix one of the press buttons and in checking the others I failed
to notice an extra 'reset' button next the mic plug. The readout
flashed EVEN THO THE POWER WAS OFF. On power up the VFO was now in
the 220-224 range. No use to me - we don't have that band.

I don't know if it transmitted, even. I just pressed the reset with
the power on and had 2m back. Then I had to reset all the paramaters
I was used to. I notice it scans better, for some curious reason.

I have never seen this mod described elsewhere. eg on oak.oakland.edu
in the /pub3/hamradio/mods/alinco directory if you can ftp.

Cheers.
Murray Kelly. vk4aok


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.swt.edu!newsmaster
From: Xingde Jia <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2M Mobile: Kenwood TM-241A or Alinco DR-130T
Date: 22 Sep 1995 04:01:07 GMT
Organization: Mathematics, Southwest Texas State University
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <43tce3$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port14.modem1.cc.swt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-URL: news:rec.radio.amateur.equipment

Hi,

I am about to purchase a 2m mobile transceiver.  I've looked at different ones, and
decided (almost) to consider either Kenwood TM-241A  or  Alinco DR-130T.  It seems
that these two have the same functionality.  I really need your input about these
two radios.  I appreciate your comments.

Thank you very much for any info!

73, KC5QLS - Jia
===============================================================================
Xingde Jia                   Phone: [phone]
Southwest Texas State U      Fax:   [phone]
http://erdos.math.swt.edu    Email: [e-mail]




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:08 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: TNC emulation using existing modelm?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <43np9o$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 02:57:24 GMT
Lines: 32

In article <43np9o$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (John Lumkes) writes:
>Hello,
>I was wondering if there is any way to experiment with packet (2m)
>using the modem I have in the computer. Is it possible for the
>computer to do the assembly and disassembly of the packets?
>Possibly via some software someone has already written.

Yeah, the computer can act as the PAD (Packet Assembler Disassembler),
but your telco modem probably can't do synchronous half-duplex Bell 202,
and that's what amateur packet uses. So you need a modem that can do those.
Baycom is an example. It's a little one chip modem that fits in a DB-25 shell
and plugs on a serial port. You load the Baycom software on the PC and it
does the PAD and user interface bits. Since it essentially turns the PC into
a dedicated TNC/terminal, it *won't* run right under Windows because that
messes up the timing with its non-premptive multitasking.

In theory, you could write a device driver (in fact one exists), but
since Baycom demands an interrupt per *bit* due to the bit banging
nature of the beast, the heavy interrupt load can swamp any other task
you try to run. Even interrupt per *character* can become burdensome as
you move to higher speeds. It's better to have dedicated hardware deal
with all this and only pass you complete frames addressed to you and
ready for processing or display. TNCs do that (after a fashion). The
serial link is still a bottleneck as speeds increase, and an internal
card that can form frames in main memory by DMA is even better.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!pipeline!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Andrew A. Price)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Radio
Date: 21 Sep 1995 22:38:08 -0400
Organization: The Pipeline
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <43t7ig$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com

Does anyone have any cheap radio broadcast equipment,say like 5 mile range.
For radio show.

What goes up, might keep going up, or down.


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:10 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!intac!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Rich)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Icom 2410 CrossBand Repeat?
Date: 22 Sep 1995 00:29:50 GMT
Organization: your organization
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43t01u$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blmfld-s5.intac.com
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.5

Hi,thanks for reading my message.
I just purchased a Icom 2410 that will crossband repeat.
Does anyone know which button actives the crossband repeat?
Thanks Again.
Rich


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: "Gary P. Fiber" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 2410 CrossBand Repeat?
Date: 22 Sep 1995 04:09:01 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <43tcst$[e-mail]>
References: <43t01u$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm11-ip27.halcyon.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

Yes the IC-2410 will do cross band repeat.  Set up the desired frequencies.
Press both the Band and Set buttons untill the memory channels change to a
flashing " L " .  To revert back to normal mode, just press the SET until
the " L " changes back to a normal memory channel number.  if you E-Mail
Icom America a request for thsi in writing, along with either a fax or
mailing address i will bet you will receive it.  There are some remote
commands to do this from a handheld if you have the UT-55 installed.
ICOM America's E-Mail address is [e-mail]

Best Regards,

Gary



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!uk-po.com!usenet
From: Pat Carpenter <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Wanted : Mullard CRT
Date: 22 Sep 1995 09:11:25 GMT
Organization: The Post Office
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <43tujt$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 147.119.112.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)


Wanted a Mullard CRT #DH7-11 3" inch flat faced 14 pin.

If you can help please email me at [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:12 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!olivea!sfgw!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Roberto Valfredini)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ICOM FAX
Date: 22 Sep 1995 07:56:27 GMT
Organization: OLIVETTI   Ivrea  (ITALY)
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <43tq7b$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hqlab74.ico.olivetti.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2


Do anybody know the fax # of icom in USA or JAPAN or have
the full directory of fax for all the country ?
please respond via email at [e-mail]

thanks

Roberto

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      P L E A S E    N O T E
Ing. C. Olivetti S.p.A takes no responsibility for the views expressed in
this mail/post.   They are the personal views of the user concerned.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!news.luc.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!uicvm.uic.edu!u40241
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago, ADN Computer Center
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 17:17:16 CDT
From: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: atlas radio
References: <434l8m$ngp$[e-mail]>
 <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Lines: 27

Well, I ordered one of these about three years ago and have been waiting
patiently to see if and what I would receive |*} .  I always liked the 210x
because for its day it was a great performer for me in the mobile.  After going
 through a KWM380 and FT-757gx and a few others I never had the same sporting
 experience as with the simple-but-strong philosophy of the Atlas.  This I
think was due to the humungous 2.7kc filter with skirts that wouldn't quit and
an analog oscillator that was very clean on rx and, I was told, tx.  The simple
panel {apparently retained} was a no-nonsense tune-and-talk facility for mobile
operation.  I used an rf compressor circuit from the Handbook and measured 50wt
output with normal speech.  I guess what has to be decided is the philosophy of
 it.  Do you want to tweak controls all day {which I love to do when I am not
in the mood for QSO's or QRM} or do you want a good ragchew while driving for
twenty minutes?  Forget two meters:  in urban areas you're in CB-land or you
have your three minutes share of a repeater.   The original Atlas circuit was
a derivative of a military design then in use.  No RF amp, and a ring mixer
followed by a high-level amp driving the filter, if I recall correctly.  It
used plug-in circuit boards and smaller than most rigs in its' power class.
    By modern standards, the shortcomings were a typical analog warm-up drift,
lack of easy expansion to accomodate WARC bands, and maybe a notch filter.
For $795, it competes with the full Ten-tec Scout system.  No contest, I will
speculate.  True the Scout has some features in common with the old Atlas
series (analog tuning, AFC option) and reports from field day said it was the
only HF rig in camp not swamped by nearby RF (if you can believe it).
    Anyway, I will give the Atlas a chance- if I live long enough to see it.
After three design changes- from DDS to Analog to DDS with RS-232, and as many
management changes, I now suspect that the folks at Atlas mean to get this rig
out if it is literally the last thing they do.
     Jim, K9ZAT.


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news2.acs.oakland.edu!detroit.freenet.org!detroit.freenet.org!rburgan
From: [e-mail] (Roland B. Burgan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: CAD tools and distribution was(Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Date: 22 Sep 1995 13:56:30 GMT
Organization: The Greater Detroit Free-Net
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <43ufae$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: detroit.freenet.org


Schematic / PCB / simul:
MicroCad
--


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:16 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news1.digital.com!pa.dec.com!depot.mro.dec.com!mrnews.mro.dec.com!est.enet.dec.com!randolph
From: [e-mail] (Tom Randolph)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Land Mobile Radio FAQ needs your input!
Date: 22 SEP 95 11:09:12
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <43ujg9$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: improv.enet.dec.com
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86823 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9583 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17205


[This post lists all the information I'm looking for. You'll only have to look
 at this once in a while from now until the FAQ is ready - N1OOQ]

The Land Mobile Radio FAQ is now under way... I need your support!

What is it?

     A listing of those surplus police and taxicab radios from the various
manufacturers, how to identify them, what band they're on, how easy it is to
tweak them into the ham bands, average price used, etc., all in one file for
your flea market shopping convenience!

     What it's not is a mod manual. You won't find out HOW to do the mods in
the FAQ. That's up to you. You will find out where to get the manufacturer's
manuals, most of which have detailed tuning procedures. Some of the radios
can only be programmed by the manufacturer, and/or by using the
manufacturer's proprietary software. Such details will be in the FAQ.

     I'd like to include any and all mobile or handheld radios aimed at the
commercial or public service market. Many of these out-perform the imported
synthesized units by a long shot, are cheaper, and make great ham rigs! Let's
put these great radios back to work and on the air!

I NEED YOUR INPUT TO MAKE THIS A REALITY!

     You don't need to mail me manuals or anything like that, unless you WANT
to. All I ask is a few bits of data for any of these radios you or your
friends may have worked on in the past. If you've put one on the air, you've
had to answer these questions, so fill 'em out and send 'em in!

Model?                  Manufacturer, model name (like Mastr II, Syntor,
                        Delta, etc.), model number

Band?                   These radios are usually made for use in a specific
                        band of frequencies, like 30-50 MHz, 150-170 MHz,
                        450-470 MHz, etc.

Freq control?           Crystal, synthesized/ROM programmed,
                        synthesized/microprocessor programmed

Average price?          What did you pay? What prices did you see when
                        shopping? New or used?

Manual price?           How much did the manual cost?

Mod difficulty?         How hard was it to get it tuned to ham band?
                        Easy: re-crystal, tweak a few tuning screws
                        Difficult: program a new ROM, swap a few parts
                        Extremely difficult: Major modification and re-design
                                             of some circuits, you must pay
                                             authorized technician to use
                                             manufacturer's software

How to indentify?       What details do you need to know to tell these radios
                        apart? Does the serial number tell you anything? Does
                        the Model number? Are there physical differences?
                        This is the stuff you need to know when sorting
                        through the radios at the flea markets.  This
                        information is usually in the manufacturer's manuals
                        in great detail.

I will re-post this notice about every couple of weeks for a while, until the
FAQ is somewhat filled out.

My net address is:   [e-mail]
All information, network pointers, periodical references, anything, is
appreciated, and thanks in advance!

-Tom R.   N1OOQ   [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!ncar!ra.cgd.ucar.edu!tomas
From: [e-mail] (Bob Tomas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: ts-520 low plate current above 7 Mhz
Date: 22 Sep 1995 16:18:07 GMT
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <43unjv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ra.cgd.ucar.edu

I "inheritted" a ts-520s.  I've noticed that it draws less plate current
on 20, 15 and 10 meters than the manual specfies it should: about 160 ma to
120 ma instead of the specified 200 ma.  It draws less as the freqencey
gets higher.

I think that all tubes are original equipment making them about 17 years
old.  This makes me suspect that they should be replaced.  However, the
finals and driver do not seem to show excessively broad tuning (the manual
states that this is a symptom of bad finals or driver tube(s)).

Does anyone have any experiences related to this problem they care to
share?

bob


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!noc.near.net!das-news2.harvard.edu!casaba.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.psc.edu!borg.ccac.edu!news
From: Glen Roberts <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT 51R -Mods
Date: 22 Sep 1995 17:04:11 GMT
Organization: Community College of Allegheny County
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <43uqab$[e-mail]>
References: <43hq4t$[e-mail]> <43q8de$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.129.6.38

Scott Lawrence <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> [e-mail] (SlowalkJR) wrote:
> >I just purchased my first HT. I'm looking for information reguarding
> >modifying the Yaesu FT51R to expand it's TX range. Thanks. Please send
> >replys to SlowalkJR.
> >James, KF4AQO
>
> I'm looking to possibly buy and FT51R.   How do you like it? Any comments?
> If anyone has mod info, Id appreciate it if you could foward it to me.
>
> I'm taking my Tech test this weekend..
>
> Thanks
>

I've had my 51RH for sevral months now and am
quite pleased with it.  I still have my old Icom 2AT
which is dedicated to packet but the 51R goes everywhere
with me.  I agree with the other chap who spoke favorably
about his.  It has so many features however that you
would be best off to get used to it and set the functions
up before you try to operate it and a car at the same
time.  We used to be able to count the thumb-wheels on the
older HTs but these new ones require the user to read the
display.  HArd to do that and drive.  Other than that,
it is a very fine rig.
-Glen  ke7fd
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!news-mail-gateway
From: [e-mail] (Bud Kuenzli)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Ham-Equip Digest V95 #452
Date: 22 Sep 95 17:27:51 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v02110102ac831d397465@[198.104.173.31]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: [e-mail]


>From: [e-mail] (BUDDY10)
>Subject: 2 m ht help please
>
>What kind of line of sight range COULD  you expect ?  Also, at full power
>how far away could you expect to RELIABLY hit a repeater in an urban
>environment ?
>
>Thanks ,
>
>Scott Powell
>KD6GPV
>General since 1995 !
>
>P.S. I was going to get one of these for my wife.


  I am sure you realize that there will be great variations in distance due
to interference and terrain. I don't live in a real urban environment (to
say the least) but I can tell you that from my cabin South of Mt. McKinley
I can hit the Anchorage repeater which is at least 70 miles away using my
Kenwood HT and a 1/4 wave ground plane mounted on my roof. In town,
(Fairbanks) with a rubber ducky I can sometimes only get a mile or two, so
it depends greatly on the antenna and terrain.




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!news
From: [e-mail] (Frank Scaraglino)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Duplexor tuning?
Date: 21 Sep 1995 18:37:10 GMT
Organization: Ericsson North America Inc.
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <43sbcn$[e-mail]>
References: <43mnjr$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: opus.rtp.ericsson.se

: I like to use the Sig gen spec anyl methode but I use 2 sig gens. I combine the 2 freqs into a hybrid combiner, and look at the 2 signals on a anylizer.

---
_______________________________________________________________________
Frank Scaraglino           [e-mail]       KA2FWC




From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:21 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Duplexor tuning?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <43mnjr$[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 05:02:30 GMT
Lines: 43

In article <43mnjr$[e-mail]> "Alan K. Adamson" <ne1h> writes:
>It seems there are two schools of thought on the topic.  One says always do it
>with a spectrun/tracking analyzer/tracking generator, the other says use a watt
>meter and signal source at the installation source and tune for max power on
>pass and min signal on notch.
>
>I for one favor the analyzer approach, as touchy as the new small cans are
>these days I would not want to try the other approach, but the advocates there
>claim that you have to have the actual load to really tune the cans correctly.

I am, of course, in the second camp. I think you have to do the final
tuning with the actual loads attached. Since they are rarely perfect
50 ohm dummy loads, they'll pull the tuning away from what you saw on
the analyser and dummy load. In some cases they may not pull the tuning
far, but it's rare indeed that they won't affect it some. It does little
good to fine tweak on the bench and then put the cans at the real site
and walk away. The tuning won't be what you think it is anymore. Most of
the change will be in the end cans, of course, but you can almost always
buy something tweaking receive pass with a weak source and a SINADer on
the receiver, and you can often buy something by tweaking the transmit
side pass for max power through, though that's often not critical, and
you can usually help desense by tweaking the transmit notches while
listening to that weak source in the receiver.

If every site presented pure 50+j0 terminations to all three ports
of the duplexer, then bench tuning would be fine. But it just doesn't
work that way. Few antennas present a perfect 50+j0 at both the transmit
and receive frequencies (few indeed, any that do probably *are* dummy
loads). And few receivers really present a 50+j0 at the transmit and
receive frequencies, especially kludged ex-commercial mobile rigs. And
few transmitters are actually 50+j0 when looking back in the output
port at the receive and transmit frequencies. The reactive terminations
that they all *do* present have to be absorbed into the duplexer tuning.
(Well, you *could* use external matching networks, but the losses through
those would likely be greater than just absorbing the reactances into the
duplexer tuning.) Perfect tuning just won't work in an imperfect world.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!news.luc.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!news.cc.uic.edu!uicvm.uic.edu!u40241
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago, ADN Computer Center
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 18:22:46 CDT
From: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Cleaning of Equipment...Advice please...
References: <43p0i6$[e-mail]>
 <[e-mail]>
Lines: 8

Detergent cleaning of equipment does seem to work; I have rejuvenated a key-
board very satifactorily.  Drying is essential since even a pager with a 1.5 v
battery dropped in the water (e.g. toilet) if left damp without removing the
battery (including any memory lithiums) can show serious circuit land corrosion
 in 24 hours.  However, as long as no current paths exist until dry, washing
has worked for me very well on several occasions.  If you use a dishwasher, I
have heard that dishwasher detergent has fine grit included as a polisher-- you
would not want this stuff on your variable capacitor bearings or even hiding
in tuning slugs, so perhaps ordinary detergent is advisable. Good Luck.  K9ZAT.


From [e-mail] Fri Sep 22 13:29:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (N1QQV)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 21 Sep 1995 22:23:18 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 11
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <43t6mm$[e-mail]>
References: <43nrir$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

I tried using my 202 for packet and found it marginal.  Since others have
found it workable, it may be that there is some variation in audio
response from unit to unit.  On the other hand, I consider the 202 to to
be a heck of a lot of radio for the money.  Have used one day in and day
out for 2 years with no problem other than the battery getting a little
loose once in a while.  The screws loosen up, and the rails can bend and
cause intermittent contact.  Don't know of a better combination of price
and features.

73, Ken
N1QQV


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.unt.edu!jove.acs.unt.edu!tmg0001
From: Timothy Mark Glaser <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Kenwood uses false advertising?
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 23:34:11 -0500
Organization: University of North Texas
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <41jmrt$[e-mail]> <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> <42adac$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jove.acs.unt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <42adac$[e-mail]>

On 2 Sep 1995, jdb wrote:

> In <41v7qj$bvm$[e-mail]> Lord GAD
> <[e-mail]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>These is no law that requires you to hold an Amateur license for
> >>> purchasing an Amateur radio transceiver.
> >
> >AHA! I think there should be. If you must be lisensed to xmit, why
> >not be lisensed to buy? I realize that my own situation would
> >change as my fiance bought me my first rig, but hey, compromise is
> >key.

In my city, we have a fun time doing such activities such as transmitter
hunting.  Some of us have gotten very good at it. Why let the government
have another sliceof regulation.  We have found and turned in a fair
amount of illegal transmitters and will continue to do so.  I dont see a
point in getting the government involved any further..
Tim...


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!xmission!xmission!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (crum)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: anybody have an FT-10R yet?
Date: 22 Sep 1995 22:41:05 -0600
Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900)
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <440351$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xmission.xmission.com

Just heard about it.  I heard that it's a new 2-meter handheld,
- smaller than the FT-11R,
- particularly good audio from small speaker (unlike 11R),
- comes with 2 different keyboards to choose from,
- has a digital recording system,
- is rugged, and is milspec rated.

I wonder if the short digital recording can be played back while
transmitting (e.g. for identification use).

And, I have not heard how much it costs.  Anyone have one?




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pulm1.accessone.com!ghansen.accessone.com!ghansen
From: [e-mail] (Glenn Hansen)
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc,rec.pyrotechnics,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.video
Subject: Re: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:38:51 GMT
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <43v681$87d$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ghansen.accessone.com
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.models.rc:60806 rec.pyrotechnics:33456 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17225 rec.radio.shortwave:58838 rec.video:85559

In article <43v681$87d$[e-mail]> SpyKing <[e-mail]> writes:
>From: SpyKing <[e-mail]>
>Subject: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
>Date: 22 Sep 1995 20:27:45 GMT

>Looking for any and all information on electromagnetic pulse
>bombs and HERF (High Energy Radiated Frequency) Guns


Geeze, I threw the manual to my EM Pluse Bomb LTD made by Acme in the trash.
If you write them I am sure they can give you lots of information. Can't help
you on the HERF. That damn State of Washington passed a law in 1992 banning
the sales of them here.  Sorry.


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news1.digital.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!aa244
From: [e-mail] (Dallas Trembach)
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc,rec.pyrotechnics,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.video
Subject: Re: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
Followup-To: rec.models.rc,rec.pyrotechnics,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.video
Date: 23 Sep 1995 18:37:35 GMT
Organization: Saskatoon Free-Net
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <441k5f$[e-mail]>
References: <43v681$87d$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: broadway.sfn.saskatoon.sk.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.models.rc:60814 rec.pyrotechnics:33475 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17245 rec.radio.shortwave:58861 rec.video:85576

Glenn Hansen ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <43v681$87d$[e-mail]> SpyKing <[e-mail]> writes:
: >From: SpyKing <[e-mail]>
: >Subject: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
: >Date: 22 Sep 1995 20:27:45 GMT

: >Looking for any and all information on electromagnetic pulse
: >bombs and HERF (High Energy Radiated Frequency) Guns


: Geeze, I threw the manual to my EM Pluse Bomb LTD made by Acme in the trash.
: If you write them I am sure they can give you lots of information. Can't help
: you on the HERF. That damn State of Washington passed a law in 1992 banning
: the sales of them here.  Sorry.

You know what ticks me off?  The Acme EM Pulse Bombs are still legal in
Canada, but they need <guess what?> HYDROGEN PEROXIDE to power them.
jeezus.  every damn thing needs hydrogen peroxide to power it <g>


--

 ================== The views expressed are the opinions of the author, and
=------------------======================= are in no way endorsed by the
 =========--------------------------------=============== Saskatoon Freenet.
Dallas    ===============--------------------------------===============
Trembach                 =========================----------------------===
([e-mail])                       =============------------=
A.K.A                                                          ============
    /\          /--\  /--                  /--
   //\\      |\ | _ \//--                 //--
  //         || || \|||                   ||       "You got this death wish,
  \\  oo  oo || || |||\__       oo  oo  _ |\__ _    little girl:  you don't
   \\ /\ |||||| || /||/         /\ ||||| \|/  | \   want to kill any one, and
   ////\\|||||| ||/ /||  \\  ////\\||||||\||  ||\   you don't want eat anyone."
\\// \\//|\/||| |  / \\-- \\// \\//|\/||| \\--||         --my Law teacher.
 \/   \/ \__/|/ \_/   \--  \/   \/ \__/\|  \--\|



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:30 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!homer.alpha.net!pacifier!news
From: [e-mail] (Robert East)
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc,rec.pyrotechnics,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.video
Subject: Re: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
Date: 24 Sep 1995 16:12:59 GMT
Organization: Pacifier Internet Server [phone]
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <44402b$[e-mail]>
References: <43v681$87d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip74.van3.pacifier.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.models.rc:60837 rec.pyrotechnics:33490 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17271 rec.radio.shortwave:58890 rec.video:85603

In article <43v681$87d$[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] says...
>
>Looking for any and all information on electromagnetic pulse
>bombs and HERF (High Energy Radiated Frequency) Guns

Contact the US military or the Russian military.  They both experimented
with electromagnetic pulse weapons.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Pacifier Online Data Service Dialup SLIP/PPP User
To register: [phone] or telnet pods.pacifier.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!usenet
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc,rec.pyrotechnics,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.video
Subject: Re: ElectroMagnetic Weapoms
Date: 25 Sep 1995 00:23:45 GMT
Organization: Toys for Special Children
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <444sqh$[e-mail]>
References: <43v681$87d$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip35-81.il.us.ibm.net
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.03
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.models.rc:60844 rec.pyrotechnics:33497 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17280 rec.radio.shortwave:58908 rec.video:85616

In <43v681$87d$[e-mail]>, SpyKing <[e-mail]> writes:
>Looking for any and all information on electromagnetic pulse
>bombs and HERF (High Energy Radiated Frequency) Guns

Smith & Wesson (of firearms fame) experimented with a device many years
ago that jammed the engine electronics of a chased vehicle.  I believe it was
scrapped due to the danger posed by a vehicle when it loses power assist in
the brakes and steering.  I believe I saw the article in the Wall Street Journal.




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!pinetree
From: [e-mail] (WB3U)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Cleaning of Equipment...Advice please...
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 04:54:56 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <43p0i6$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pinetree.microserve.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4

   [e-mail] (Steve Ellington) wrote:

>What about that extreemely hot water? Looks like that would damage
>plastic dials, eat the grease right out of your dirve mechanisms, get
>water in your s-meter, etc etc.

I agree.  I was in the service biz quite a few years, and we considered wet
cleaning to be a last resort.  This is especially true with older gear that
has paper coil forms.  At the very least, this rig would have to be
considerably disassembled to protect the parts you mentioned above.

Anyway, the guy didn't say the chassis had any kind of film or grease or
corrosive liquid on it.  He's just trying to remove sawdust and dirt.  I'd
remove the tubes (be sure to mark exactly where any duplicates go so the
rig doesn't have to be realigned), then take it to the gas station and blow
it out.  Keep the air away from the front panel so it doesn't damage the
meter or any fragile dial components.

Whatever dirt is left when you're done, just leave it there.  It's a
transceiver, not a dinner plate.  <g>

73,

Jack  WB3U


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help!!!  Ignition Noise......
Date: 23 Sep 1995 01:13:12 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 10
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <440518$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I've installed a dual band mobile rig in a 1973 Land Rover. Getting a
popping noise on receive that varies with engine speed,  not an alternator
whine.  Rover is 12 volt negative ground.  Has standard ignition,
distributor, points, etc.   Hot wire for rig is run directly to battery.
Good solid ground.    Already installed modern high quality Bosch resistor
plugs,  and,  new carbon core resistor type plug wires.   What's next?
Thanks......
Rick Crider
KD4FXA
<[e-mail]>


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:35 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!gw2.att.com!nntpa!bigtop!dwroll!raf
From: [e-mail] (D434-Richard_A_Ferguson(Richard)x82612)
Subject: Re: Help!!!  Ignition Noise......
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Originator: raf@dwroll
Sender: [e-mail] (Netnews Administration Login)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dwroll
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: AT&T
References: <440518$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 02:33:02 GMT
Lines: 25

From article <440518$[e-mail]>, by [e-mail] (RICKCRIDER):
> I've installed a dual band mobile rig in a 1973 Land Rover. Getting a
> popping noise on receive that varies with engine speed,  not an alternator
> whine.  Rover is 12 volt negative ground.  Has standard ignition,
> distributor, points, etc.   Hot wire for rig is run directly to battery.
> Good solid ground.    Already installed modern high quality Bosch resistor
> plugs,  and,  new carbon core resistor type plug wires.   What's next?
> Thanks......
> Rick Crider
> KD4FXA
> <[e-mail]>

I have resolved ignition noise by shielding it at the source.  This is
particularly difficult for operating HF from the car.  I have copper
shield (hollow braid) on my spark plug wires, and a copper box over
the distributor.  This made a dramatic difference in my ignition noise
on HF.

You might also run the ground wire direct to the battery.

Richard Ferguson
KA0DXM
Boulder Colorado

My opinions are my own, not those of my employer


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:36 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Looking for first handheld, suggestions?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <43fo47$[e-mail]> <43s705$[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:51:48 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17228 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86854

In article <43s705$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Shawn C. Masters) writes:
>Scott Lawrence ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: I just started studing for my tech test.  I want to get a dual band
>: handheld.  Can anyone recommend one.  A friend of mine who just got his
>: license, bought a Icom IC-T21A.  It's incredibily small!!!   But its only
>: 2 meter.
>
>       I would suggest getting an old IC-2AT.  They go for around $100 with
>all the extras.  The radio is damn near indestructible in normal use, and
>works well.  This gets you operating without being overwhelmed by features
>and price.  Once you have played with the HT then you'll knwo better what
>you want out of a fancier one.  For now, you probably won't use but a small
>number of the features on a higher priced model.

Excellent advice as usual, Shawn. I'd add one more thing. You won't
lose much to depreciation by buying used. When you get ready to sell,
you'll get almost all your money back. That certainly isn't true when
buying new. You pay dearly in initial depreciation for that pristine
cardboard box.

And a final thought. Newer isn't necessarily better. There are few
HTs out there that can match the old 2AT's performance as a *radio*.
It's not a scanner, and it's not a Gameboy, but it is a good two
way radio. The only serious lack it has is no CTCSS. If two meter
machines in your area require CTCSS for access (fairly unusual in
most areas), look elsewhere for a radio. (You can fit a CTCSS encoder,
but you'll be stuck opening the rig to change the tone, and that can
be a pain if you use several machines that each have a different
access tone.)

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:37 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jgardner
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Gardner)
Subject: Re: Looking for first handheld, suggestions?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <43fo47$[e-mail]> <43s705$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 19:25:25 GMT
Lines: 13
Sender: [e-mail]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17293 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86968

Gary Coffman ([e-mail]) wrote:
: machines in your area require CTCSS for access (fairly unusual in
: most areas), look elsewhere for a radio. (You can fit a CTCSS encoder,
: but you'll be stuck opening the rig to change the tone, and that can
: be a pain if you use several machines that each have a different
: access tone.)

Or you can do as I did: get the Comspec CTCSS encoder that uses a DIP switch
to set the tone and cut a hole in the HT's case to poke the DIP switch
through. Then you can change tones at will without opening the rig.

--
Jerry Gardner          | Maintainer of the Large Format Digest
[e-mail]    | Send subscription requests to [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:38 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: CB to 10m conversion?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 05:26:52 GMT
Lines: 40

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (charles copeland) writes:
>I have heard of CB's converted to 10m radios.
>
>Does anyboy have any info on this?
>
>I believe CB's run AM, would mod involve changing freq. and change
>AM to SSB?
>
>Is it worth the effort?

Is anything worth the effort? Depends. It's a cheap way to get a
10 meter radio, and you might learn something doing the conversion.

First off you'll do best to find a SSB CB. Then it's just a
straightforward reprogramming of the synthesizer and a change
of the conversion crystal to get you on 10 meters, usually in
the 28.3 to 28.5 MHz area where you'll find a lot of coded
Techs, and others, hanging out on SSB. This can be a worthwhile
conversion. I've done a couple of them.

If you have an AM CB, converting it to SSB is not practical.
You can either leave it as AM, there is some AM activity in
the middle of 10 meters, up toward 29.0 MHz, or you can convert
it to FM and use it up above 29.0 MHz. The FM conversion is not
bad, but does require some surgery and addition of a few parts
to make a FM modulator and demodulator. Up at the top of 10 meters
there are repeater channels. Getting the rig to operate the repeater
splits can be a challenge since it wasn't designed to work that way.
You have to arrange a 3 channel shift when going from transmit to
receive. That requires more poking around the synthesizer. I'm not
sure that's a practical mod, you might just leave it as a simplex rig.
It's harder to say if this conversion is worthwhile. *I* wouldn't
bother, but then I've already got a rig that covers 10 meters.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:39 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!drumoak.demon.co.uk
From: Ian Langmead <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FT-726R Tone Squelch Unit
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 07:47:54 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: drumoak.demon.co.uk
X-Broken-Date: Saturday, Sep 23, 1995 07.47.54
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7

Does any one have the circuit diagram of the CTCSS tone squelch module
for an Yaesu FT726R or info on fitting/building  a CTCSS.

Thanks
--
Ian Langmead



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:40 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!usenet
From: "Robert A. Kile" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ICOM 735 on 160?
Date: 22 Sep 1995 01:37:52 GMT
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <43t41g$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Don,
       The ICOM IC-735 is one of the finer/reliable radios ever made. The
filters are a little bit broad but, the receiver clarity and dynamic
range will make up for that. The transmitter is also very reliable and
stable. However, because it was designed as a mobile it lacks a RF
speech processor which might be more desirable on 160. All in All you can
not go wrong....

Bob KG7D



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:41 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!bighorn.accessnv.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Squeak Porray)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706
Date: 21 Sep 1995 20:26:41 -0700
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <43tadh$[e-mail]>
References: <43o7vl$[e-mail]> <43ruip$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Allen Hansen, EEB ([e-mail]) wrote:
: [e-mail] (pmy ) wrote:

: >I saw an ad in the latest QST for this dream rig.  Nobody seems to have
: >it in stock yet.  Anybody know the street price for this rig?  Is it
: >100% duty-cycle?

: Price is $1299.  Not sure about the duty cycle.  I saw one last night
: and it is AMAZING.  I'm going to sell my IC736 and get one of
: these little beauties.

: Allen


: *********************************************************************
: *ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT BANK                       Sales- 800 368 3270*
: *323 Mill St. N.E.                               Fax-   703 938 6911*
: *Vienna, VA  22180                               BBS-   703 938 3781*
: *                  Internet: [e-mail]                   *
: *                     Compuserve: 73424,1345                        *
: *  Amateur Radio, Shortwave Radio, Scanning Radio, Commercial Radio *
: *********************************************************************

Icom has just today (September 21) announced that the FCC has granted
type acceptance for this radio.

Icom projects shipping by the end of this month (September).

Amateur Electronic Supply will be having Icom Days at two of their stores
in this time frame ... at the Ohio store on Saturday, September 30, and
at the Las Vegas store on Saturday, October 7. Icom will do their typical
"dollars off" Icom day coupons at all A.E.S. stores on those two days.

We, the dealers, are looking forward to seeing those radios .... Icom had
a get-together with all A.E.S. managers at Icom Headquarters in Bellevue
about six weeks ago, where we all had a chance to get some hands-on
experience with both the IC-706 and the IC-775DSP ... and we can report
that these are both  f-i-n-e  radios!

Hope to hear from you soon!

73,

"Squeak" Porray, AD7K
Manager AES/Las Vegas


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:42 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!bighorn.accessnv.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Squeak Porray)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 706
Date: 22 Sep 1995 22:29:15 -0700
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <4405vb$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]




From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:43 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!bighorn.accessnv.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Squeak Porray)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need Kenwood 7400A Serv. Manual,help
Date: 22 Sep 1995 22:37:20 -0700
Organization: accessnv.com
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <4406eg$[e-mail]>
References: <43vl7i$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Steve Pazar ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Hi Gang,
: I foolishly purchased a non-working TR-7400A two
: meter rig last weekend. I repaired the major problem
: (shorted 5 volt supply), but the receiver sensitivity
: is too low (about 20 uV). I have verified that the
: receivers front end amp, and helical resonator file
: ter is OK, so now I'm looking at the first mixer and
: first LO power. Anyone have any idea what power
: (or voltage) I should see out of the synthesizer?
: Yes, I do have the proper equipment to measure it,
: I just don't know what level to expect. Has anyone
: out there seen this problem (low sensitivity), and
: solved it? I'd sure like to hear from you!!!

: I'm also working at a disadvantage because I do
: not have the service manual, and the schematic
: included with the owners manual does not include the
: synthesizer. Anyone willing to blast a copy of theirs?
: As usual, I'll be happy to pay copying ans shipping
: costs.

: Thanks!


: ***************************************************************************
: *  STEVE PAZAR           DoD #702           Kawasaki KZ440A
: *  E-mail:   [e-mail]
: *  Ether:    WA4DUT/6
: *  Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed...
: ***************************************************************************

Have you checked to see if the Kenwood Service Manual for that radio is
available yet? The West Coast distributor for Kenwood parts is
   Pacific Coast Parts
   800 262 1312.

Good luck!

  -- "Squeak" Porray, AD7K
      Manager, Amateur Electronic Supply/Las Vegas



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:44 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!intac!intac.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Gary Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Need Kenwood 7400A Serv. Manual,help
Date: 23 Sep 1995 23:36:28 -0400
Organization: INTAC Access Corporation-- An Internet Service Provider.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <442jns$[e-mail]>
References: <43vl7i$[e-mail]> <4406eg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nile.intac.com

In article <4406eg$[e-mail]>,
Squeak Porray <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Steve Pazar ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>: Hi Gang,
>: I foolishly purchased a non-working TR-7400A two
>: meter rig last weekend. I repaired the major problem
>: (shorted 5 volt supply), but the receiver sensitivity
>: is too low (about 20 uV). I have verified that the
>: receivers front end amp, and helical resonator file
>: ter is OK, so now I'm looking at the first mixer and
>: first LO power. Anyone have any idea what power
>: (or voltage) I should see out of the synthesizer?
>
>: ***************************************************************************
>: *  STEVE PAZAR           DoD #702           Kawasaki KZ440A
>: *  E-mail:   [e-mail]
>: *  Ether:    WA4DUT/6
>: *  Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed...
>: ***************************************************************************

Before you go looking for trouble in the mixer,
have you checked the T/R switching yet?  In that radio they used a pair of
diodes to control the RF switching between TX & RX.  The one affecting the
reciever shorts the RX antenna input to ground when a DC voltage is applied
to forward bias it.  If this diode is shorted or has a low resistance it could
create exactly the effect you are seeing.  Also verify that the DC bias is
applied only in transmit mode and that there is NO voltage applied to it
during receive. (I just checked the schematic. This is diode D2. [ p/n MI301 ])
Also check the connections between D3, L9, C20, C21, and D2.  This area tends
to get heated up and any poor connections / cold solder joints here can
cause problems with both receiver sensitivity and TX power output.

  Good luck,

  Gary, WA2BAU



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:45 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!col.hp.com!bubba.ucc.okstate.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.uoknor.edu!news.ualr.edu!grapevine!dave.dennett
From: [e-mail] (DAVE DENNETT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Azden
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 22:39:00 -0500
Organization: Ferret BBS ! North Little Rock AR ! 501-791-0124
Reply-To: [e-mail] (DAVE DENNETT)
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.2
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.0
Lines: 2

Anyone have the address or phone number to call for repair service on an
old Azden PCS2000 2M rig?


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:46 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.cerf.net!pagesat.net!aldus.northnet.org!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Francis Lamb)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Azden
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 12:56:48 GMT
Organization: NorthNet
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <443kic$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: aldus.northnet.org
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

[e-mail] (DAVE DENNETT) wrote:

>Anyone have the address or phone number to call for repair service on an
>old Azden PCS2000 2M rig?

The new address for Azden service:

AZDEN CORPORATION
Communications division
147 New Hyde Park Road
Franklin Square, NY 11010

[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:47 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (J.Fitter BV/N0IAT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Question: Sound card and Software for decoding RTTY/CW ect.
Date: 23 Sep 1995 09:14:59 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Asia, Semiconductor Finance
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <440j6j$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.167.36.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] says...
>Since most sound card have a input and output it
>seems logical that there
>should be a smart HAM who hase made some software to
>use a Sound card as a
>input device for decoding digital radio signals like
>CW/RTTY/AMTOR ect.
>
>If any one is aware of software like this and if it
>is availble as shareware
>please let me know where to find it.
>
>Erwin Cremers
>PE1MGR
>Dutch Radio Amateur


Erwin,
I would be very interested in getting a copy of the
same, especially RTTY and/or SSTV.  Please let me know
if you find one....PCs are very common here in
BV-land, but RTTY interfaces are difficult to come by.
Lots of hams here might be interested.  Thanks es DX
73


--
73 from Joe BV2/N0IAT  Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.
Ex. 7J1AOF(Japan) KA0ZDH(novice) YU3/N0IAT(Slovenia)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986 //comments are mine
only



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:48 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!sun4nl!knoware.nl!news.utrecht.knoware.nl!usenet
From: mark Nieuwenhuizen <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: President James info wanted
Date: 23 Sep 1995 09:44:24 GMT
Organization: Knoware Internet
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <440kto$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac-10.knoware.nl

I just bought a second-hand President James 27 MC. What i didn't find in the handbook was the
key-code to toggle between 40CH FM/80CH FM/80CH FM/AM.
Can anybody give me the sequence of key pushing?
Please respond through this group because my mail-delivery-system is temporarely
out of order.

Thanks,
Mark Nieuwenhuizen
Holland


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:49 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!nctuccca.edu.tw!news.cc.nctu.edu.tw!ccnews.nchu.edu.tw!news.fcu.edu.tw!news
From: [e-mail] (yanky)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Icom 2410 CrossBand Repeat?
Date: 23 Sep 1995 07:34:19 GMT
Organization: Your Organization
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <440d9r$[e-mail]>
References: <43t01u$[e-mail]> <43tcst$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.83.188.155
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.4

>Yes the IC-2410 will do cross band repeat.  Set up the desired
frequencies.
>Press both the Band and Set buttons untill the memory channels change
to a
>flashing " L " .  To revert back to normal mode, just press the SET
until
>the " L " changes back to a normal memory channel number.  if you
how about Ic 2340h do Repeat
please tell me



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:49 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!iglou!jgg
From: [e-mail] (James G Gray)
Subject: IC725MOD?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou.iglou.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Administrator)
Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 11:56:58 GMT
Lines: 10

Does anyone of a way to open the TX of the Icom 725?
I want to use it with a transverter but the current tx is limited.
Thanks,
Jim, KQ4EL

--
****************************************************
[e-mail]

****************************************************


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:50 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: "Gary P. Fiber" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC725MOD?
Date: 24 Sep 1995 01:41:03 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <442cvf$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm11-ip2.halcyon.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

Cut D 5 on the PLL board.  That will open the 725 up

73' Gary



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:51 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!news1.best.com!news3.net99.net!news.cais.net!wb3ffv!blkcat.blkcat.com!f41.n109.z1.fidonet.org!f42.n109.z1.fidonet.org!fforum.blkcat.com!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 22:33:00 -0400
From: [e-mail] (Timothy Cadigan)
Subject: IC725MOD?
Message-ID: <NOMSGID_1=3A109=[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
X-Comment-To: (Jgg)
Organization: Net 109 Fidonet<->Internet gateway
Lines: 10
X-Gateway: FIDOGATE 3.9.3

Jim,
Saw your note.  Send me an address and I'll send you
a copy of the mod, it is not too hard.  When I got my
725 a few years ago I was still active in MARS. The mod
took all of 30 min to do (this in the hands of a biologist).
Good luck
73
Tim Cadigan (fidonet return)
or
[e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:52 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (J.Fitter BV/N0IAT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Icom IC706?
Date: 23 Sep 1995 09:10:00 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Asia, Semiconductor Finance
Lines: 25
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <440it8$[e-mail]>
References: <43n63v$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.167.36.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17241 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86875


>I got the impression from GJ4ICD's page that they
were already available in
>Europe. Anyone over there confirm this? How about
elsewhere in the world?
>

>73s  Alf     NU8I/G4ABB
>[e-mail]
>Phoenix,  AZ
>
Hi Alf,  The rigs are available in JA, and I saw them
in Hong Kong(VS6) and Singapore (9V1) a couple weeks
ago during a business trip.  I imagine they should be
stateside really soon.  Heard one on the air on 18
Mhz about a month ago--sounded good but the OM
complained that the 2M output wasnt enough for him (in
JA 2M is only simplex, so ya need more pwr than 10
watts out usually).

73 from Joe Fitter BV2/N0IAT in Taipei, TAIWAN R.O.C.
Ex. 7J1AOF(Japan) KA0ZDH(novice) YU3/N0IAT(Slovenia)
Licensed Radio Amateur since 1986 //comments are mine
only



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:53 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: "Gary P. Fiber" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Icom IC706?
Date: 24 Sep 1995 01:38:31 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <442cqn$[e-mail]>
References: <43n63v$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm11-ip2.halcyon.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17252 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86900

meyer,

What do you mean with problems.  What kind of problems ?  The radios were
not even produced until August 1995.  They have been in europe for about 3
weeks.  If you care to e-mail [e-mail]. I am sure ICOM
would like to know about the " supposed problems that have been occuring
for many months know. "

73' Gary







From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:54 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!news.compulink.com!news2.compulink.com!meyer
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: [e-mail] (meyer toole)
Subject: Re: Icom IC706?
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Organization: ComputerLink Internet Direct.
X-Client-Port: 3041
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <43n63v$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <442cqn$[e-mail]>
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: fate.idirect.com
Date: 24 Sep 95 22:43:35 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Lines: 25
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17282 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86939

Gary P. Fiber ([e-mail]) wrote:
: meyer,

: What do you mean with problems.  What kind of problems ?  The radios were
: not even produced until August 1995.  They have been in europe for about 3
: weeks.  If you care to e-mail [e-mail]. I am sure ICOM
: would like to know about the " supposed problems that have been occuring
: for many months know. "

: 73' Gary
Why get so defensive?
Just what I have heard on 20 meters.  Usually when hams talk about these
things, they don't make it up, nor do they do it in a bad way.
Just to put you at ease, I will try to find out what problems
specifically have been reported in Europe, and get back here.
Also, somewhere in England there is a WWW site with lots of chatter about it.
Hope I haven't ruined your day or anything like that.





 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 : Stop on by the Internet TeleCafe! telnet://telecafe.com:9000 :
 ----------------------------------------------------------------


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:55 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
From: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Icom IC706?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
References: <43n63v$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 12:52:36 GMT
Lines: 19
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17276 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86929

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (meyer toole) writes:
>Apparently the 706 has been out in Europe for a few months. With problems.
>It should be out in North America in the next 2 weeks. Likely early October.
>Hopefully all problems have been dealt with.
>73,
>Meyer.
>VE3ECX

Well don't tease us, Meyer, tell us about the problems. I've been
eyeing the ads thinking a 706 would fit nicely in my Jeep. But if
it has problems, I'll just find a way to mount the 735 in there
instead.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | [e-mail]
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:56 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!merlion.singnet.com.sg!ts900-2018
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Wee, 9V1ZV)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Kenwood TM-251 mods?
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 14:02:06 GMT
Organization: Singapore Telecom Internet Service
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4413uk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts900-2018.singnet.com.sg
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2

I heard that the TM-251A/E is capable of receiving in the
region of 800-900 MHz+. From the block diagram it looks like
this is possible. I was just wondering if anyone knows how
to do this mod, and for that matter, any other mod for this
mobile rig is welcome. Thanks in advance.

73 de 9V1ZV Daniel


 Daniel Wee | [e-mail]
 9V1ZV      | [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:57 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!merlion.singnet.com.sg!ts900-2018
From: [e-mail] (Daniel Wee, 9V1ZV)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 2M Intermod filters/help?
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 14:06:58 GMT
Organization: Singapore Telecom Internet Service
Lines: 22
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <44147o$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts900-2018.singnet.com.sg
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2

I'm in a situation where my 2M rig is severely affected
by IMD from paging transmitters in the region of 150MHz
and up a few MHz. This is pretty severe so I would
appreciate any advice as to how to fight this. Rig is
a Kenwood TM-251 mobile with a vertical 5/8-lambda on the
roof. My IC-22A, an x-tal controlled rig does not suffer
as badly because (I think) of the helical filter in its
front end design. Cavities are a bit too expensive to buy
(maybe homebrew one). I've been thinking of PAR notching
cavity, and external helical solutions. Some of these
require I insert into the rigs receive line with mods
to the rig. I don't mind as long as it works but impedance
matching may be a problem doing that. Can anyone who has
had some success in fighting IMD of this nature please
advise? Thanks.

73 de 9V1ZV Daniel


 Daniel Wee | [e-mail]
 9V1ZV      | [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:32:59 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (MRI)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Were the power outages REALLY an act of "God"?
Date: 23 Sep 1995 19:27:28 GMT
Organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc., Ellicott City, MD USA
Lines: 97
Message-ID: <441n30$[e-mail]>
References: <43vp56$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clark.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]

What does this crap have to do with ham radio equipment ?

If you have nothing to say, please don't say it here !






Ms. Robin Shannon Brookstone ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Those of you here in Denver who suffered the massive power
: outages that you thought were caused by Wednesday nightÆs
: storm may be interested in reading this. ItÆs the text of a
: letter I faxed to the Public Utilities Commission and the
: 3 big local TV news stations. ( BTW, We live in far northeast
: Denver, between the old and new airports.) I got a call from
: channel 4 ( CBS affiliate ) today, to ask me some questions
: and say they will be looking into it.
:
:
: Public Utilities Commission
:                                     September 21, 1995
: To Whom It May Concern,
:                       Yesterday we had many short power
: outages followed by one long one from about 11:40 PM until
: around 5:20 AM. During this time, we could look out the door
: and see brilliant flashes north of our house, over towards
: 56th Avenue, as trees touched the power lines and were
: detonated! Every time the power tried to come back on we
: would see another bright flash. During part of this time the
: power was on at the houses across the street from us, but
: later a bright flash occurred and even that went out! Then
: the power came back on for about an hour ( I think, because I
: was very sleepy ) and then went out again for about another
: hour! We think that all these power outages were no accident,
: nor were they an ôact of Godö caused by the snow storm, as
: Public Service Co. would have us believe! It is our opinion
: they were caused by a purposeful act of  negligence, the
: result of the management at PSCo. not doing their jobs!
:
:       Awhile back we were experiencing several power
: outages a week in our neighborhood and we could always tell
: it was a certain feeder because the lights at the houses
: across the street from us would almost always remain on. We
: complained to PSCo. at that time and when it did no good, we
: complained to the PUC. The situation was finally temporarily
: fixed. But what we learned from an employee at PSCo. at the
: time, was that the outages were being caused because PSCo.
: was not insisting that trees be trimmed so they donÆt go into
: the power lines every time we get windy, snowy and/or rainy
: weather!
:
:       It is PSCo.Æs job to see that trees that grow too
: close to power lines are trimmed! The owner of the residence
: is supposed to it but if they donÆt, PSCo. has legal right of
: way, which they may exercise and force the homeowner to allow
: them access to the property to trim the trees. Then I believe
: they are allowed to bill the homeowner for the costs of
: trimming them! But what I was told by this PSCo. employee was
: that there were some people, including someone on the Denver
: City Council, who would not allow access to their property to
: do so, and so they ôcouldnÆt trim themö! I also heard about a
: year ago, from someone I used to know who works at PSCo.,
: that theyÆve been short handed for several years, and might
: even be having to lay some people off despite being short
: handed,  because they made bad investments back in the æ80Æs
: ( during the junk bond period? ) and lost a lot of money. So
: for awhile they hadnÆt been sending meter readers around
: regularly ( thatÆs been corrected recently ) and itÆs very
: likely been part of the reason they arenÆt being assertive
: about keeping trees out of the power lines! So now that leads
: us to ask;  Were all the power outages around the city last
: night caused by untrimmed trees?!  Power lines donÆt
: generally shut down from only rain, snow or wind!
:
:       But am I mistaken?! I thought even powerful
: politicians are supposed to live by the same laws everyone
: else does! Or is the recent trend towards arrogant
: politicians, who no longer seem to have to care what the
: public wants, contributing to this situation?! And why should
: we be subjected to the constant annoyance of unnecessary
: power outages because some politician expects that they donÆt
: have to live by the same rules as everyone else?!  There is a
: handicapped woman in our household who is disabled, in
: constant severe pain due to the consequences of a past
: injury, and also suffers from allergies and asthma. She does
: not do well when the air filters wonÆt run and sooty candles
: must be burned for even enough light to be able to safely go
: to the bathroom! So unless itÆs ôGodö living in our
: neighborhood, or maybe the reincarnation of King or Queen
: Tut, canÆt someone get PSCo. to do their jobs right and see
: that those trees get trimmed?!        We are formally requesting
: that you look into this matter and try to get it corrected!
:
: Ms. Robin Shannon Brookstone
: [snipped our address & phone]
: Internet Email Address: [e-mail]


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:00 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!vivanews.vivanet.com!mulveyr
From: [e-mail] (Rich Mulvey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?  Ugly?
Date: 23 Sep 1995 21:15:42 GMT
Organization: Mulvey Home Node
Lines: 43
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <441tdu$[e-mail]>
References: <42lsse$[e-mail]> <43h7rv$[e-mail]> <43li5k$[e-mail]> <43mqg5$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip130.vivanet.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Thomas Randall ([e-mail]) wrote:
: John Olson ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : Thomas Randall ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : : Drew Durigan ([e-mail]) wrote:
: : : : What great timing!  I just passed my tests this past weekend and should
: : : : be getting my Tech-Plus ticket soon.  My 2510's all ready to go on 10-
: : : : meters (finally get to use that radio for it's "intended" purpose :-),
: : : : but I need to get me a good, inexpensive 2-meter rig to get started with.


: : : : I understand Radio Shack has put the HTX-202 on sale for $199 this month.
: : : :  Is this a good radio or another one of those famous "Rat Scrap Lemons?"
: : : : Is it worth $199, or would I do better elsewhere?

: : :   Drew,
: : :    Get the 202, it's a nice rig. I also recommend spending the extra
: : : money on the maintanence plan just in case you drop her off a cliff or
: : : off the table. I've had mine since October of last year and not one
: : : problem so far. Sturdy radio by the way!

: : : Tom - KB2SMS

: :   Drew: The HTX-202 is ok for normal voice communications, BUT IF you
: : have any asperations of running packet with it - FORGET IT! It's JUNK.
: : Congrats on the new ticket!
: :                                    73's  John  WA6IKO



:  I disagree! I use mine for packet with NO PROBLEMS at all. Works just great.

   Considering that mine has been running 2-1/2 years, 24 hours a day,
7 days a week as a TCP/IP node, I'd say that the person who claimed
that it's junk needs to re-examine his definition of "quality."  :-)

- Rich


---
Rich Mulvey, N2VDS                                        Rochester, NY   USA
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
n2vds@wb2psi.#wny.ny.us


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!vivanews.vivanet.com!mulveyr
From: [e-mail] (Rich Mulvey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tentec Scout
Date: 23 Sep 1995 15:52:47 GMT
Organization: Mulvey Home Node
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <441agf$[e-mail]>
References: <43jcfr$[e-mail]> <43mf16$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip130.vivanet.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

John M. Rymell ([e-mail]) wrote:
: host [e-mail] (Your real Name) wrote:
: >I am thinking about buying a Tentec Scout. If you have used one would you
: >please E-mail your opinions to me?
: >
: >Thanks,
: >Joe AA6WG
: >

:  Joe,

:   Nice little rig for the bucks. Using a Scout as a portable rig for
: RACES drills over the past 6 months.
:   Enjoy the freatures. Light, small, easy to handle in field conditions.
: This is a real 'thumbs up' recommendation!


   There is, however, a problem that may affect your decision if you're
a CW operator.  The Scout's frequency stability can be somewhat erratic
as the microprocessor constantly tries to keep you on frequency.  Basically,
it bounces around enough to be noticable to the other operator.  You can
usually tell when someone is using a Scout, even before they get to a
description of the rig.  :-)

   Also, the cost of the Scout + all band modules is equivalent to the
price of a more fully-featured all-band rig.  If portability is not an
issue, you'll want to consider that, as well.


---
Rich Mulvey, N2VDS                                        Rochester, NY   USA
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
n2vds@wb2psi.#wny.ny.us


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:02 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!crl2.crl.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Henry B. Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Tentec Scout
Date: 23 Sep 1995 10:25:27 -0700
Organization: Dallas, TX
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <441fu7$[e-mail]>
References: <43jcfr$[e-mail]> <43mf16$[e-mail]> <441agf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: crl2.crl.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Rich Mulvey ([e-mail]) wrote:

:    There is, however, a problem that may affect your decision if you're
: a CW operator.  The Scout's frequency stability can be somewhat erratic
: as the microprocessor constantly tries to keep you on frequency.  Basically,
: it bounces around enough to be noticable to the other operator.  You can
: usually tell when someone is using a Scout, even before they get to a
: description of the rig.  :-)

:    Also, the cost of the Scout + all band modules is equivalent to the
: price of a more fully-featured all-band rig.  If portability is not an
: issue, you'll want to consider that, as well.

The Scout that I operated had a bad backlash problem with the tuning knob.

Is this common with the Scout?

--
Henry Smith ([e-mail])



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:04 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!ceas.rochester.edu!atd.rochester.ny.us!al
From: [e-mail] (Al Davis)
Subject: Re: CAD tools and distribution was(Re: 2m to 6m Transverter
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <[e-mail]> <43mg1u$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <43roe4$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 15:37:35 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17249 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9594

Gary Coffman ([e-mail]) wrote:
: I'd like to see us standardize on a schematic distribution
: format, a netlist format, and a mechanical drawing format.
: Then form a rec.radio.amateur.CAD group where we could
: post such things, as well as Radio Designer and Spice
: files, Mathcad worksheets, etc. Since many of the CAD tools
: can handle several formats, and there are utilities to convert
: others, perhaps we should start with a survey of what tools
: the majority of us interested in this have in common and see
: if there are common formats we all share. I'll kick it off.

It is not just "have in common".  We need a format that is free and
will not become obsolete.  Unfortunately, the tool vendors like to
lock you in.  Not all of us use dos/windoze.  There is also Mac and
a variety of unix systems.

For netlists, Spice is the obvious choice, possibly with well
documented extensions.  Every good analog simulator either can use it
directly or has conversion utilities available.  (to the extent that
the features overlap)

For schematics, postscript seems like a good choice on a quick
glance, but there are problems.  The plus side is that some systems
have it built-in, and some printers use it directly.  Postscript
previewers are available for anything, sometimes free (Ghostscript).
All good drawing programs can generate it, at least indirectly.  The
down sides are that may not be editable, it may not be possible to
convert it back to something that it editable, and it is hard to
extract a netlist from it.  Some programs can edit a subset of
Postscript. (Illustrator)  But how do we convince the others to
stick to the subset that can be edited?

How about demanding an annotated Spice netlist?  It is easy to add
coordinates to each element.  How about 2 sets each -- one for
schematic, one for layout.  It is easy to make a tool to strip them
out for Spice.  It should be easy to patch the simulators to ignore
the extra fields.  The simulators could actually make use of the
layout info for interconnect analysis.  Since many schematic programs
will output a Spice deck, they could be changed to preserve the
locations.  Maybe someone could make a simple viewer for it, and make
it available on the net for free.  How about an anno-spice to
postscript converter?  (master's project, perhaps?) Any takers?

Please don't make me buy any particular tool, especially one that
doesn't run on my machine.  Free ones off the net are no problem, as
long as they have source and can be compiled on my machine.


--



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:05 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!gsm001!gsmlrn
From: [e-mail] (Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Subject: Subaru 1996 Legacy L Wagon
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: gsm001.mendelson.com
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (NNTP Poster)
Organization: mendelson.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:57:22 GMT
Lines: 19

Hi,

Having just dramaticly increased the family debt, we now have a new Subaru
1996 Legacy L station wagon. I would like to install a 2m or 2m/440 rig in
it.

Any thoughts, suggestions, etc. Advice specific to this model or station
wagons in general would be appreciated.

Thanks and 73,

Geoff.


--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson  (N3OWJ)
President, Mendelson Computer Consulting, Inc.
Voice [phone]  Fax [phone] Email: [e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:06 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: IC-706: Does it have CTCSS?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 00:25:40 GMT
Lines: 17
Sender: [e-mail]

One thing about the new Icom IC-706:  even if the HF portion is not the
best, $1299 or less is a great price for a 6M/2M all-mode transceiver.
I am just curious if the unit is equipped to generate CTCSS tones, and can
they also be stored in the memories?

Looks like a great rig to me, but I have not been able to learn too much
about it.  For SSB/CW work on 2M, 10 watts is not really enough power, but
it is certainly enough to drive an external amplifier.

Any info will definitely be appreciated.

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:07 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!news.halcyon.com!usenet
From: "Gary P. Fiber" <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: IC-706: Does it have CTCSS?
Date: 24 Sep 1995 01:47:17 GMT
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc.
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <442db5$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm11-ip2.halcyon.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)

i am testing a 706 right now.  This is from the operating manual:

" Each memory channel can store a tone frequency, sub audible tones or tone
burst, and an offset frequency.  Store repeater information into memory
channels for quick and easy access to repeaters."

Hope this helps. Also the sub tone is accessed through the front panel.  I
will be on 20 meters tommorow aroung non PST, No particular frequency
though. I also have the AT-180 automatic tumer. i have a 20 dipole
installed for this about 15 feet up.  Listen for KF7XV

73' Gary KF7XV



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:08 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!news.fibr.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Gary Harmon)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: SAMS Photofact # 273
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 02:56:19 GMT
Organization: Fibrnet Internet Services
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <442h8u$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: link196.txdirect.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99.82

Does anyone have a SAMS #273, tab 7?  This is the information I need
on the Hallicrafters TW-2000 receiver.  I will be glad to pay copy
costs and mailing if anyone can help.  Please advise.  Best 73,
GaryHarmon/K5JWK



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:09 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!hbcsc274
From: [e-mail] (Jerry Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Yaesu FT530 mod (greenwire)
Date: 24 Sep 1995 04:46:23 GMT
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <442nr0$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.csun.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I heard something about a mod cutting the green wire inside the FT530 that
will give it extended rx.  What exactly is this mod?  Can someone give me
the specifics? i.e. what is the rx range?  And also, I heard this mod only
works with newer radios, the older ones still need the jumper pad 13 mod.
I bought my radio about 5 months ago, will this one work?
My serial number starts with 4J301xxx.
Please reply here or by email.
Thanks a bunch!
Jerry (KE6UUX)



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:10 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.tyrell.net!tyrell.net!bowers
From: John Bowers <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Need your input for Surplus Land Mobile Radio FAQ
In-Reply-To: <43n25h$[e-mail]>
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tyrell.net
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (*)
Organization: Tyrell Corporation - 800-TYRELL-1 - POP's in 504/816/913/316
References: <43n25h$[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 04:19:38 GMT
Lines: 52
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86905 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9597 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17259

Tom
read your msg on putting these older radios back in service on the ham
bands.  My son and I bought some Motorola Mitreks and are converting
them.  These were a matter of recrystaling and replacing one cap and
rewinding a small coil.  All this is done in the frequency elements and
then retuning the radio.  I have had good luck with the first one (just
finished it).

I would like info on the conversion of a 450 Mhz MICOR.

Let's discuss

John K9UTK


On 19 Sep 1995, Tom Randolph wrote:

>
> What the heck, let's make it official:
> I'm willing to compile a FAQ, all about those surplus police and taxicab
> radios and converting them for ham-band use... you know, the ones you always
> hear on the air 'cuz somebody converted one: Motorola Mitrek, GE Master II,
> Phoenix, Delta, blah, blah, blah. There's dozens of these things available for
> cheap money, and I'm sure a lot of us would like to know which ones to look
> for, and which to skip over, as their performance often beats the imported
> synthesized rigs!
>
> In particular, what I want to get is information on how to identify the
> particular models, what band they're on, crystal or synth, whether they're an
> easy conversion, need a fair amount of work and skill, or are impossible, and
> how to tell all of this by looking at them and reading the model/serial
> numbers. Also, it'd be good to know if a full manual with schematics and
> tune-up procedure is available, from either the manufacturer or a Sam's
> photofact type publication.
>
> I don't really want to start a database of HOW to do the mods. That would be
> difficult without graphics, and would occupy megabytes! This should be fairly
> easy to deduce from the tune-up procedure and other details in the manual.
>
> WHY do this?
> 1) I'm interested - I've passed over a lot of these at fleas, for lack of any
>    information about what I was looking at.
> 2) It doesn't seem to exist anywhere else. A lot of hams have some knowledge
>    about some radios, no one has written it all up.
> 3) Put these radios back to work, and save them from the scrapyards!
>
> So there it is... all info, pointers, literature references appreciated! Send
> to me at: [e-mail]
>
> -Tom R.   N1OOQ   [e-mail]
>
>


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:11 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.sims
From: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: HTX-202...Good?  Bad?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 23 Sep 95 22:53:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Top Of The Rock BBS Atl, GA 404-921-8687
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Steve Sims)
References: <43vsiv$[e-mail]>
Lines: 20

TR>: But it performs as it is advertised it will - and it does it
TR>: excellently.

I want to second this opinion.  I got an 2-meter Radio Shack and liked
it so much that I got a 440 model to keep it company.  I liked the
remarks about the astetics, because while it does not outclass much in
the way of bells and whistles, it does do everything that you need it
too and quite well.  As for packet, my brother has borrowed the 2 meter
brother and has been using it with a baycom packet modem.  It has been a
good setup for him for over a year now.

Steve
---
. OLX 2.1 TD . hAS ANYONE SEEN MY cAPSLOCK KEY?
. KMail 3.0aa

----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA
Phone: [phone]             Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Lilburn, GA 30247-7440


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:12 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlowman
From: [e-mail] (Jim Lowman)
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <[e-mail]> <43mpei$[e-mail]> <43so8g$[e-mail]> <43uhj0$[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 00:53:18 GMT
Lines: 43
Sender: [e-mail]

Jay Maynard ([e-mail]) wrote:

: Do you demand that all cb/scanner stuff not show up at your local swapfest,
: too?

: The idea is that rec.radio.swap is the online swapfest. Just as you can find
: lots of different types of electronics at a swapfest, so can you in
: rec.radio.swap. If you don't want what a particular seller has on his table
: (in his post), then walk past it.

: This group was cast as having no forsale posts for a reason: because that
: allows sites that prohibit their use for personal monetary gain (and yes,
: there are some, primarily in the government) to carry this group and not
: carry r.r.s, and thus keep themselves out of trouble. If you insist on
: posting for sale messages to this group, those sites will drop it. You may
: not like that state of affairs, but it's reality.

This post, the above paragraph in particular, is the best of the group.
Instead of simply restating what the charter says, Jay gives good reasons
why "for sale" ads shouldn't be posted in the rec.radio.amateur.* hierarchy.

The time has come to do one of two things:  go through the formal process to
create a new newsgroup, or drop the subject...forever.

I'm not that familiar with the process, other than knowing that a new group
is first proposed on alt.config, followed by a request for discussion, then
a call for votes.  Gary, it sounds like you have the appropriate knowledge.
What does everyone think?  Continued debate on this topic is pointless.

Here's my informal proposal:

Create the new group rec.radio.amateur.forsale.  This naming convention is
widespread on the Net, is more intuitive than .swap, and maybe it will
alleviate the posts to other parts of the hierarchy.

All suggestions, flames, etc. are welcome.

Jim

[e-mail]  |   Jim Lowman    * KF6CR*    San Bernardino, CA
Systems Analyst     |   San Bernardino City Unified School District
[phone] (O)  |   Unix:  "It isn't supposed to be easy...If it
[phone] (FAX)|   was, everyone would be doing it."  -Unknown-


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:13 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!newspump.wustl.edu!crcnews.unl.edu!unlinfo.unl.edu!mcduffie
From: [e-mail] (Gary McDuffie Sr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: * This Group Is Not For Sales or Purchases *
Date: 24 Sep 1995 03:16:53 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln
Lines: 47
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <442ij5$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <43mpei$[e-mail]> <43so8g$[e-mail]> <43uhj0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: unlinfo.unl.edu

[e-mail] (Jim Lowman) writes:

>Jay Maynard ([e-mail]) wrote:

Jay's "include" deleted...

>This post, the above paragraph in particular, is the best of the group.
>Instead of simply restating what the charter says, Jay gives good reasons
>why "for sale" ads shouldn't be posted in the rec.radio.amateur.* hierarchy.

I would have to agree.  However, I have to say at this point that this
is the first I have seen of the above include.  My site must not be
getting all of them.  The points Jay made are good ones. But, my point
still stands.  See below.

>The time has come to do one of two things:  go through the formal process to
>create a new newsgroup, or drop the subject...forever.

>I'm not that familiar with the process, other than knowing that a new group
>is first proposed on alt.config, followed by a request for discussion, then
>a call for votes.  Gary, it sounds like you have the appropriate knowledge.
>What does everyone think?  Continued debate on this topic is pointless.

If I am the "Gary" you referred to, I don't have the knowledge of how
to start a new group.  But, I think it is worth considering.  I still
say that I don't, and won't, wade through a bunch of non-amateur
postings to find something.  That group is far too active and takes
too much time.

>Here's my informal proposal:

>Create the new group rec.radio.amateur.forsale.  This naming convention is
>widespread on the Net, is more intuitive than .swap, and maybe it will
>alleviate the posts to other parts of the hierarchy.

Forsale is too confining.  Are you then going to make a separate group
for WANTED and TRADE?  It isn't practical.  A better name is needed.
While the difference is subtle, rec.radio.amateur.trader seems more
appropriate.  Just an idea.

I feel like I'm jumping into the middle of this, since I have
obviously missed some posts in the middle.  However, from the use of
the name Gary, and the cb/scanner quote in the other message, I'm
assuming they are comments made in reference to my post.  My apologies
if they are not.  I'll butt out. :)

73, Gary McDuffie, Sr.


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:14 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!usc!newshub.cts.com!crash!cg57.esnet.com!lasernet.com!greg_richard
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Message-ID: <50924010006$[e-mail]>
X-Gateway: Act-Up 4.6  24 Sep 95 01:00:06  LaserNet, Serving Fido style systems
Lines: 3
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 23:34:40 LOC
Organization: The East County Repeater Association (52:1000/205)
From: Greg Richard <[e-mail]>
Subject: TNC

I'm looking for a KPC-3, a PK-88, or an MFJ 1270B OR C.
Please leve me a message if you know of any for sale.
TNX,  Greg


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:15 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sundial.sundial.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (John Hoaglun)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: 190.400 receiver
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 03:06:33 GMT
Organization: Sundial Internet Services
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <442hp8$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sundial.sundial.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

How hard would it be to build a 190.400 reciever ???? Where could I
get  the needed info to build this reciever ?



John Hoaglun
[e-mail]

  John Hoaglun
  [e-mail]

  To surf one of the  web pages  that I maintain point to:

  http://www.sundial.net/~wftvch9/



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:16 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mv!wd1v.mv.com!user
From: [e-mail] (John Seney)
Subject: Software - Macintosh
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: wd1v.mv.com
Sender: [e-mail] (Paul Hurley)
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 10:55:26 GMT
Lines: 45


Mac Computers + Hams + Radios =

      Macnet Software

on 10 New Disks just $30.00

(Each Stuffed with the Latest Self Extracting
   Public Domain Versions - 800k Disk)
Shipped First Class Mail - Ppd!

Macnet 1    Logs + Demos
Macnet 2    DX  + Contest
Macnet 3    Educ + Rem Ctrl
Macnet 4    Astro + FAX
Macnet 5    Pkt Terminals +
Macnet 6    Net/Mac TCP/IP +FAQ
Macnet 7    Novice Test + (Or the Ham Test of Your Choice)
Macnet 8    Sat Trackers + Dove
Macnet 9    C/C++ Programming Tutors
Macnet 10   Macnet Roster ("Whos Who" of Hams w/ Macs)

Send Check or Money Order - Outside USA Send $40.00
All Orders Shipped within 48 Hours

73,


\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
John D. Seney, WD1V                Internet:      [e-mail]
144 Pepperidge Drive        America On Line:        [e-mail]
Manchester, NH 03103-6150         AX.25 Pkt: [e-mail]
(H) 603-668-1096                   Ampernet:    [e-mail]
     Source for Free Macintosh Amateur Radio Test Simulators
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
LeCroy Sales Engineering -  Maine, New Hampshire, and Northeastern
                            Massachusetts
(O) 800-553-2769      (F) 603-627-1623    (P) 800-SKYPAGE #5956779

   All opinions are my own, including Digital Storage Scope.FAQ

 To obtain the latest copy automatically, simply send me an EMAIL
       with "subscribe scope.faq" in the subject field.
   or:  http://beam.slac.stanford.edu/www/library/w3/dso.html
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:17 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (KE4IOF)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 2M Mobile: Kenwood TM-241A or Alinco DR-130T
Date: 23 Sep 1995 23:29:20 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 23
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <442jag$[e-mail]>
References: <43tce3$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

In article <43tce3$[e-mail]>, Xingde Jia
<[e-mail]> writes:

>I am about to purchase a 2m mobile transceiver.  I've looked at different
>ones, and
>decided (almost) to consider either Kenwood TM-241A  or  Alinco DR-130T.
It
>seems
>that these two have the same functionality.  I really need your input
about
>these
>two radios.  I appreciate your comments.
>
>Thank you very much for any info!
>
>73, KC5QLS - Jia

Go for the DR150T. It'll cost about $20-$25 more, but it is well worth it.
The DR130T is an excellent radio, but is lacking in some "nice" features,
like memory skip.


Mark


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:18 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!newshost.marcam.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!atha!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!io.org!innuendo.tlug.org!telly!whome!gts!reptiles.org!westonia!humnet.humberc.on.ca!hduff
Subject: 2m to 6m Transverter
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
From: [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 21:49:03 EST
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: HumberNet LSS
Lines: 29


> I plan to publish a 2M to 6 meter transverter design in QEX.
> However, no circuit boards will be available unless someone
> else designs them.  After all, QEX is an experimenter's
> exchange published by the ARRL. I think circuit boards
> discourage experimentation.
>
> Zack KH6CP/1
> [e-mail]
>

Hi Zack... can you give us a brief rundown of the design...
Passive or active mixers ?  MMIC gain blocks ?  What about the front-end
and PA ?  Airwound or toroidal inductors ?
In what issue of QEX do you expect it to appear ?

Regards..

Hugh Duff  VA3TO  Toronto

---
 ■ NFX v1.3 [000]

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
  HumberNet LSS (Learning Support System) - Humber College, Toronto
     "Tomorrow's communication and learning environment, today"
          Visit our Website at http://humnet.humberc.on.ca/



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:19 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenet
From: Paul Keezer <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Ham View Product Demos on the WEB
Date: 24 Sep 1995 14:57:19 GMT
Organization: PDK Inc.
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <443rkf$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: keez.tiac.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b5 (Windows; I; 32bit)

Ham View Products has a WWW page with latest releases and
demonstration downloads.  You can get there through
http://www.tiac.net/users/pkeezer/hamview.htm  This page will
be updated regularly with new Amateur material.  The latest
downloadable stuff includes:
Version 5 release for Win95
Demo Version 5 Log View
Cluster help file.
gd dx
- Paul NX1P



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:20 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news.kei.com!intac!sailboar!jeff.sumberg
From: [e-mail] (JEFF SUMBERG)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ts-520 low plate current above 7 Mhz
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 15:48:00 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: The SailBoard BBS * Ringwood, NJ, USA * [phone]
Reply-To: [e-mail] (JEFF SUMBERG)
References: <43unjv$[e-mail]>
X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20
Lines: 30

All of the other suggestions are valid ones, and by the way, if you
change the finals, don't forget to do the neutralization adjustment.

I would try changing the driver tube first, as the others said. But if
the tubes are that old, treat the rig to a new set of tubes.

I recently found a strange problem with a rig that a friend bought at a
hamfest, it was a TS-820, which has the same transmitter section as
your 520 does.

The rig had low power in any of the "carrier" modes (TUNe, CW, and on
the 820, FSK). The problem turned out to be the CW filter. In SSB mode
it put out full power. You didn't mention in which mode you are getting
low current values. This problem was not frequency dependant, as your
is.

When this CW filter was removed from his rig, and placed into my 820,
the problem followed it (my rig had the same low output).

I'm not suggesting this could be your problem, but if your 520 has a CW
filter, try changing the jumper on the IF card to the "wide" position.

--
-=======================================================================-
| 73 de N2VYU, Jeff, in Ringwood New Jersey  (Fn21)                     |
| Email: [e-mail] ** Packet: N2VYU @ WA2SNA.NJ.USA.NA |
| Advanced class - WAC on RTTY - Ramapo Mountain Amateur Radio Club     |
-=======================================================================-

 * 1st 2.00 #32s * .


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:21 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!DIALix!brisbane.DIALix.oz.au!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Murray Kelly)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: ts-520 low plate current above 7 Mhz
Date: 24 Sep 1995 20:36:00 +1000
Organization: DIALix Services, Brisbane, Australia.
Lines: 9
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <443cag$rvf$[e-mail]>
References: <43unjv$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: [e-mail]

Always replace the driver first in these rigs. Very often it is
all that's needed. Tune up again after, of course. The 6146 is
really rugged but the 12BY7A seems to drop of quite quickly.

Of course you save a bundle replacing the driver only!

Cheers.
 Murray kelly vk4aok.



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:22 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!gryphon.phoenix.net!Bob
From: [e-mail] (Bob Biekert)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco 6m Mods?
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 17:41:00 GMT
Organization: KA5GLX
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <44457c$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial19.phoenix.net
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3

Are there any modifications to the Alinco DRM06 6m mobile?

Thanks
Bob


Bob Biekert  Houston, Texas    KA5GLX   Join the Clear Lake ARC
CLARC Homepage  http://www.phoenix.net/USERS/biekert/index.html


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:23 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.itd.umich.edu!zaxxon.rs.itd.umich.edu!jartz
From: [e-mail] (Jason Nathaniel Artz)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Help! TH-78A Question!
Date: 24 Sep 1995 18:29:16 GMT
Organization: University of Michigan
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <44481s$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: zaxxon.rs.itd.umich.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hi there.  A fellow student here at the university brought his Kenwood
TH-78A which he bought new in Hong Kong (where he is from).  He gave it
to me to look at and program, and I discovered something quite strange.

First of all, it _is_ at TH-78A, not a 78E.  It does not have the
characteristic 'Tone' button of the 78E located where the 'MONI' button
should be.

The radio came with a AA cell holder - not a rechargable battery pack.

Also, the radio recieved from 50MHz to 179MHz on 2meter side, and from
400 to 512MHz on the 70cm side.. and he said he never opened it up.  It
also transmitted a little bit out of band, although not as far as it
received.

Anyway, the radio worked fine but had one main problem.  It would NOT
send PL tones.  I would select the tone, put it in PL mode (the little T
in a box would appear in the display), and transmit.   But it didn't send
the tone.  I tested it by turning on CTCSS on my own handheld and
confirmed that no tone was being sent.  His 78A also did not have CTCSS
squelch-decode capabilities.

Although his manual contained no english, there was a section in spanish
which we were able to fumble through.  We figured out that there is an
optional CTCSS decode chip available for the radio.. and we assumed that
his radio dosen't have it.  But it didn't say anything about the radio
not being able to send PL tones without this chip.

Anyone have any information on this?  He really needs it to be able to
send PL tones in order to bring up the university repeater.

--
@@@
Jason N. Artz
email: [e-mail]            University of Michigan,
Braindead Bassoonist                    Ann Arbor

Are you a fan of Brocktoon?
###


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:24 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.corpcomm.net!news.bahnhof.se!newsfeed.tip.net!peroni.ita.tip.net!mikasa.iol.it!news
From: [e-mail] (Enrico Di Stefano)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Logbook
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 18:31:51 GMT
Organization: Italia Online
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <444832$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-225.mclink.it
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99b.112
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86931 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17277

Hi all,
I need some information... Anyone here could suggest me a good
software for creating and managing an amateur-radio station logbook?
The software should preferrably run under ms-windows 3.1 and should be
shareware or even better freeware...
I appreciate suggestions on where i can find such a software, or
better if you would be so kind to post it here or to send it to my
e-mail address... :-)
Bye all,

--- ivan ---



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:25 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indy.net!indy1!andyb
From: [e-mail] (Andy Birkhead)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Logbook
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Date: 25 Sep 1995 10:59:00 GMT
Organization: IndyNet - Indys Internet Gateway ([e-mail])
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <44621k$[e-mail]>
References: <444832$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: indy1.indy.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:86952 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17287

Enrico Di Stefano ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Hi all,
: I need some information... Anyone here could suggest me a good
: software for creating and managing an amateur-radio station logbook?
: The software should preferrably run under ms-windows 3.1 and should be
: shareware or even better freeware...
: I appreciate suggestions on where i can find such a software, or
: better if you would be so kind to post it here or to send it to my
: e-mail address... :-)

I use log-eqf, you can find it at FTP: oak.oakland.edu

Andy KB9CAT



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:26 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!news.dfw.net!news.dfw.net!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (David McLean)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Alinco 610 mods needed!
Date: 24 Sep 1995 14:40:47 -0500
Organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <444c7v$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dfw.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I need the alinco 610 mods. I can't seem to find them in ant ftp sits!
--
                                             David MClean
                                     From the World of Ham Radio!
                                           KC5NNV Is Clear!


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:27 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (fontam)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Turner mic wiring problem
Date: 24 Sep 1995 20:18:24 GMT
Organization: Your Organization
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <444eeg$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clark.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+


I have an old Turner +2 mic. that looks like it was rewired internally at
some at some past point in time.  Does anybody know how the switch inside the
mic is supposed to be wired?  Thanks...73...Marc  AA3JQ


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Jeff Goldman <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: New Yaseu HT?
Date: 24 Sep 1995 20:45:12 GMT
Organization: CompuServe HamNet
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <444g0o$d78$[e-mail]>

The antenna connector is the opposite of the Motorola SMA connector? Not
good. How is the supplied antenna since we'd be pretty much stuck with using
that one?


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:28 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wyoming.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Don Breazile)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: icom 2410 help
Date: 25 Sep 1995 02:35:37 GMT
Organization: wyoming.com LLC
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <4454hp$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cys-cap-4.wyoming.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

does anyone know if there is a pot that deals with the s meter on a
2410h?
or the phone number for icom to see about getting a service manual for
the 2410

73 Don



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:30 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!druid.borland.com!csus.edu!csusac!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!zimmer!news
From: [e-mail] (Rafael Solis)
Subject: Yaesu YC-355D Frequency Counter
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: zimmer.csufresno.edu
Organization: CSU Fresno
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 03:00:17 GMT
Lines: 13

Hi all:  I have a Yaesu YC-355D 30-200Mhz. frequency counter that a
good friend of mine gave me as a b-day present.  I don't need it and
I'm thinking in selling it and buying something else (he won't mind
about this!).  Can someone here give me a hint of the ongoing price of
this gadget?  (please do not suggest me to ask my friend!)

Raphael  (KE6JSR)








From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:31 1995
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!slay
From: [e-mail] (Sandy Lynch)
Subject: Help - KAM/FT1000 RTTY problem
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Keywords: KAM
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 03:49:51 GMT
Lines: 28
Sender: [e-mail]
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10561 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17285

I seem to have a problem using my KAM (v5.X) with my FT-1000.
It seems that my transmit and receive frequencies are offset
by approximately 400Hz.  If you have any suggestions, they
would be most welcomed.

Set-up:

1. KAM (5.X firmware) connected using a custom cable with separate
   connectors for CW key-in, Packet, and RTTY on the FT-1000.

2. FT-1000 PKT/RTTY dip switch #5 set to "reverse".  At first,
   the rcv was okay but the xmit was "inverted".  Changing this
   dip switch on the top of the FT-1000 at least made both sending
   and receiving "intelligible" (with another local station).

3. Software is Host Master for Macintosh 2.2b.  (yep - that's right, I
   use a Mac :-)

Any suggestions what I ought to try next?  To be frank, I don't recall
ever operating RTTY (nor amtor/hf packet) with the KAM/FT-1000 combo.
I have used the KAM on RTTY in the past with my FT-757GX/II ... but
it's been a couple of years since I've tried HF digital. ;-(

Cheers
Sandy  WA6BXH
WA6BXH@N0ARY
[e-mail]



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:32 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (WA6UBE)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Help - KAM/FT1000 RTTY problem
Date: 25 Sep 1995 13:13:58 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 13
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <446o0m$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (WA6UBE)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:10570 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17291

Any suggestions what I ought to try next?  To be frank, I don't recall
ever operating RTTY (nor amtor/hf packet) with the KAM/FT-1000

---> You might check to see if your transmit frequency is shifting becuase
the radio itself is changing frequency due to variation in power supply
voltage..

I have run into this problem where the power supply voltage drops under
transmit
load. This could be a cause of a shift in frequency..

Patricia gibbons - wa6ube
[e-mail] "The Vertical Skywave Girl"


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:33 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.inc.net!news.moneng.mei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Jose Antonio Gonzalez)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: SUPER KEYER CMOS III
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 09:31:05 GMT
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <44640h$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip145-2.ut.nl.ibm.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17288 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:9613

Hello!

I would like get the QST's review of this keyer. May some one send it
to me, previous send of green stamps, of course?

Many thanks and 73 from Spain

--
__________________________________________________________________________
Jose Antonio Gonzalez Lorenzo --- [e-mail] ---  Amateur Radio: EA2BSN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:34 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!jaxnet.jaxnet.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!stellar.comnet.com!news
From: Marcus <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: FS: or TRADE Goodies! Radios, Etc.
Date: 24 Sep 1995 22:33:24 GMT
Organization: Utah Wired
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <444mbk$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: assign34.comnet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)
To: ALL

For Sale or trade for items listed at end of posting:

1 Year old Yaesu FT5100 Dualband VHF/UHF mobile..moded for Wideband: $400 or
offer.


2 GE Phoenix Underdash 40 watt 16 channel Radio w/scan 140-165 MHZ, Synt.
Programmable by EEprom from any local GE dealer.... Using them for Packet!!
$150.00 each or offer..with mics and power cords and brackets!

1 Complete - working GE Mobile phone, full duplex with glenayre head VHF,
with mobile 50 watt duplexor... this would totally make an excellent full
duplex link for some ham project.... $50.00 or offer

1 Fujistu Ten 40 watt 16 channel mobile.. works with scan/ VHF band
excellent condition  $150.00 or offer..


2 Bendix King... 14 Channel 5 watt VHF walkies w/scan and rapid desk
chargers.... $100.00 each or offer



Want:

2 4 meg  30 pin simms

2 8 meg 72 pin simms

Want a VGA monitor, in great working order...

Want DX-66  cpu..... or DX 33 cpu any brand...

..
Email me at [e-mail] for more info...


All items do not include UPS ground shipping...





From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:35 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!news.belwue.de!news.uni-ulm.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!moritz
From: [e-mail] ()
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Do 2m HTs TX beyond 144-148 Mhz?
Date: 25 Sep 1995 15:58:21 GMT
Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <446jit$[e-mail]>
References: <43kjuj$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ipers1.e-technik.uni-stuttgart.de
Xref: grape.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:17290 rec.radio.amateur.misc:86959

>Many HT's can be modified to transmit beyond their "normal" range. However
>modifiying amateur equipment to do this is generally illegal.

Geoff,

Seems you have not understood the basic concept of amateur radio.
Amateur radio is by definition experimental, with the effect that
you are entitled to built and operate transmitting equipement.

(In some countries having built a TRX is a requirement)

As a result, the transmitting range of amateur radios is not
subject to regulations (In fact *all* commercial HF TRX are capable
of out of band transmissions)

The point is that responsibility not to actually transmit out
of band rests totally with the licensee.

73, Moritz DL5UH



From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:36 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (GARYEJ)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: Yaesu FT530 or FT51-R
Date: 25 Sep 1995 14:41:50 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 4
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <446t5e$[e-mail]>
References: <435362$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (GARYEJ)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

I bought a FT51-R at the Huntsville ,Alabama Hamfest this year.I am very
satisfied with my radio . No problems with my radio heating up that I have
noticed so far.
Great Radio ..


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:37 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: IC751a bandswitch lamp out. Help?
Date: 25 Sep 1995 09:13:10 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 5
Sender: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <4469t6$[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Mparkes)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

My 751a bandswitch lamp evidently burned out. When I depress the switch
the light doesn't come on. Rig changes bands okay so my guess is the lamp
just went out. IS this something I can change myself? Anyone out there
ever had to do this with a 751a? I'd rather not have to ship the rig to
ICOM for such a minor problem if I can fix it myself. Thanks, Mike KS4DA


From [e-mail] Mon Sep 25 19:33:38 1995
Path: grape.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!swiss.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet
From: [e-mail] (Drew Durigan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Re: 13" Pro Am scanner antenna ok for 2m transmit?
Date: 25 Sep 1995 13:29:10 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <446ar6$[e-mail]>
References: <445f0c$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

[e-mail] (Hiran C. Fernando) wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I was wondering if anyone knew if the Pro Am 13" scanner antenna (its a
>mobile mag mount made by Valor), is okay to transmit 2 meter at 5 watts,

>without damaging the HT?  The package claims it works and is safe, but
I
>want some 2nd opinions

Not unless it has a small coil in the base.  You need 19.5 inches to be
resonant on 2-meters.

-Drew in Charlotte-
 KF4DDM