home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Toolkit for DOOM
/
DOOMTOOL.ISO
/
news
/
0100
/
0116
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-07-28
|
1KB
|
31 lines
Newsgroups: alt.games.doom
Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!ae233
From: ae233@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Bob Lanctot)
Subject: Re: Does a 486DX run Doom faster than an SX?
Message-ID: <CtonF3.9AC@freenet.carleton.ca>
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: ae233@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Bob Lanctot)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30u5jo$c2s@usenet.rpi.edu> <23JUL199405285643@bestsd.sdsu.edu> <30r694$pf4@usenet.rpi.edu> <collise.940723145141@spit
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 03:37:51 GMT
Lines: 18
In a previous article, millen3@rebecca.its.rpi.edu (Neal W. Miller) says:
> I cited the source very clearly... I said I that I estimated them
>based on my experience with the machines. I never claimed to be an
>authority, and I never claimed to have any academic degrees in programming
>or hardware design. I have plenty of experience on literally scores of
>different PCs with process that run the full gamut, and all of my claims are
>based on that experience. Take it or leave it.
Oh, my! Are we getting a little testy here?
--
_________
/ \ | Bob Lanctot |
o===========|======OOOOO))**))**))-------| Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
\_________/ "Have darts, will travel!" | ae233@Freenet.Carleton.CA |