home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Time - Man of the Year
/
Time_Man_of_the_Year_Compact_Publishing_3YX-Disc-1_Compact_Publishing_1993.iso
/
moy
/
121492
/
1214620.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-08
|
5KB
|
111 lines
ETHICS, Page 46Conduct Unbecoming
Faced with investigating sexual-harassment charges against one
of its own, the Senate ventures into uncharted territory --
and undefined punishment
By JOHN ELSON - With reporting by John Snell/Portland and Nancy
Traver/Washington
It was as if Bob Packwood had suddenly become an unperson
-- the Senator from Not. During freshman orientation time in
Washington last week, 11 newly elected Senators and 110
fledgling members of the House fumbled their way around Capitol
Hill. But as they consulted with senior lawmakers about the
bewilderingly complex rules of their august institutions, the
office of Oregon's normally gregarious five-term Republican
Senator was eerily silent, except for an occasional reporter's
unwelcome call.
There was sufficient cause for Packwood's pariah status.
His home state's Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence
last week informed the Senate ethics committee that five more
women had accused Packwood of sexual harassment. Those claims
came in the wake of complaints by 10 campaign workers, lobbyists
and senatorial staffers who had earlier told the Washington Post
about his unwanted kisses and fondlings. In response to the Post
story, the Senator denied specific charges but said he was sorry
if his behavior had offended anyone.
Packwood, however, did not answer the latest accusations:
he was incommunicado, undergoing diagnosis for possible alcohol
abuse at an undisclosed treatment center. Some viewed this as
a calculated dodge. "Packwood is playing the role of victim,
using the alcoholism excuse," said Thomas Mann, an expert on
congressional affairs for the Brookings Institution. "It's clear
that he is overwhelmed and is trying to figure out how to manage
this scandal."
At least some of Packwood's new accusers are expected to
file formal charges with the ethics committee, which quickly
announced -- after being elbowed by majority leader George
Mitchell of Maine -- that it had begun a preliminary inquiry.
Female voters in Oregon were particularly shocked by Packwood's
alleged improprieties. After all, he had an established record
as an advocate of women's causes, including abortion rights and
family leave. (So had Democrat Brock Adams of Washington, who
abandoned his re-election campaign in March after published
charges, which he denied, that he had sexually abused women.)
Had the stories appeared before Nov. 3, Packwood might well
have lost his costly ($7.8 million) re-election battle against
Democrat Les AuCoin. A previous challenger for Packwood's seat,
former state supreme court justice Betty Roberts, derided the
implication that alcohol had caused the Senator's misbehavior
as "an insult to the victims and the voters of Oregon. I think
the only proper step for him to take now is to resign." Oregon
Democrats were organizing a recall effort, even though legal
experts say the state's law on recall does not apply to members
of Congress.
Packwood will emerge from the treatment center to face some
new realities. Sexual harassment of female aides is no longer
a tolerated perk of his traditionally macho club: the six women
Senators, four of them just elected, will surely do their best
to see that the locker-room ethos of the upper house goes the
way of cloture. Members of both House and Senate now worry that
more past indiscretions will surface. Thanks to Anita Hill,
Washington women have greater assurance that their careers will
not suffer if they call a powerful boss to order. And experts
on sexual harassment are telling them that reporting it early
is the best response to an unwanted grope.
Has the Senate enough courage to discipline its own
miscreants? The ethics committee is widely viewed as either an
oxymoron or a bad joke, thanks to its wrist-slapping treatment
of Senators implicated in the S & L scandal. The watchdog group
Common Cause urged the committee to retain outside counsel for
the Packwood investigation, since, as Common Cause president
Fred Wertheimer noted, "very serious questions have been raised
about the committee's performance in upholding and enforcing
Senate rules and standards."
More optimistic is Harriet Woods, president of the National
Women's Political Caucus. Accusations of sexual harassment
constitute only one of many threats to the integrity of
Congress, she argues. And with the institution under fire,
leaders of both houses will henceforth be far more assertive in
privately confronting members who have reportedly misbehaved
and telling them to shape up. "They're not saying they get it,"
Woods says, "but they know the political consequences of
harassment." Beyond that, 260 House members and 58 Senators
have voluntarily pledged to follow the guidelines on sexual
harassment that were drawn up last year by women's groups on
Capitol Hill in the wake of Anita Hill's testimony.
As for Bob Packwood, he has to know one thing. Oregon
voters -- both men and women -- will be closely watching what he
does in the next six years.