home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Info-Mac 3
/
Info_Mac_1994-01.iso
/
Periodical
/
TidBITs
/
TidBITS#163⁄Modems.etx
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-02-14
|
25KB
|
486 lines
TidBITS#163/Modems
==================
In this special issue, we present our general modem discussion (at
least enough so you can judge among modems that have impressive
sounding, but misleading, specs) and review two popular
v.everything modems, the Practical Peripherals PM14400FXSA and
the Supra's SupraFAXModem v.32bis. They're both inexpensive,
capable, and reliable (although that's not to say that other
modems may not be equally as good).
Copyright 1990-1993 Adam & Tonya Engst. Non-profit, non-commercial
publications may reprint articles if full credit is given. Other
publications please contact us. We do not guarantee the accuracy
of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and company
names may be registered trademarks of their companies. Disk
subscriptions and back issues are available - email for details.
For information send email to info@tidbits.com or ace@tidbits.com
CIS: 72511,306 -- AppleLink: ace@tidbits.com@internet#
AOL: Adam Engst -- Delphi: Adam_Engst -- BIX: TidBITS
TidBITS -- 9301 Avondale Rd. NE Q1096 -- Redmond, WA 98052 USA
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Topics:
Fast Modems Rule
Modem Speed
Actual Connections
Modem Software
Extra Features
Support
Fax Galore
FaxMania
Conclusions
Details
[Archived as /info-mac/digest/tb/tidbits-163.etx; 25K]
Fast Modems Rule
----------------
In the last year we've seen the rise of several varieties of fast
modems, which I jokingly call "v.everything" modems because they
seemingly support every standard protocol in the
telecommunications world, including such arcana as v.22bis,
v.42bis, v.32, and v.32bis, none of which I'm going to explain
here. I could do so, and if there's enough clamor I might consider
it, but it's not that interesting and the major magazines have all
done a decent job of it in the past. In addition, I feel you
shouldn't give a hoot what protocols your modem uses; you should
ignore it entirely because all modems should support all
protocols. As we'll see, that's unfortunately untrue.
In any case, as enthusiasm grew to a fever pitch, I decided that
in the interests of science I should review several of the most
popular modems so I could pass on my findings. I chose two modems
based on several criteria: price, features, company reputation,
and the pitch of the online fever. The modems are the Practical
Peripherals PM14400FXSA and the SupraFAXModem v.32bis. The Supra
modem sells for around $360 discount, and the PPI 14400FXSA (they
should shrink that name) goes for about $50 more, but you should
find either affordable, assuming you can afford that much at all.
The testing took some time, and during that time I experienced
numerous tangential problems: the night the demon fax machine from
hell called every 15 minutes but could not connect, a trip or two
to Macworld, and the ultimate decision about which modem to keep.
As such, this review expanded to include information and opinions
that arose during the testing.
Modem Speed
-----------
Let's face it, you buy these modems for their speed. You want
screamingly fast data transfers that leaves wisps of smoke coming
out of your serial ports and burnt rubber on your phone lines. The
good news is that you'll get that speed, and you can now download
QuickTime movies without fear of tying up your phone line for a
fortnight. The bad news is that you won't get that speed
everywhere, and you'll start nagging other people to upgrade to
faster modems.
The great fallacy of modems is that you need two to tango, and if
the partners, say me and Ginger Rodgers, don't dance at the same
speed, then the you'll see a pretty lame tango because Ginger
can't dance with me the way she could with Fred Astaire.
Telecommunications takes this to the extreme, so your snazzy new
v.everything modem will step down to the highest common speed it
and a remote modem share. So you must think about the modems you
connect with, and find out if they support the same protocols as
the modem you want to buy. I say "protocols" specifically, because
modem companies bat around the term "speed" in misleading ways, so
you may see a "9,600 baud" modem that is really a 2,400 bps (bits
per second) modem that also includes v.42bis compression
protocols, thus increasing the theoretical throughput to 9,600
bps. (Although baud does not equal bps the two terms are often
used interchangeably in the industry.) So make sure your modems
share protocols, and the best one to share is v.32bis, which
equals 14,400 bps. Next in line is v.32, which equals 9,600 bps.
You can usually count on those sort of modems also supporting the
compression protocols of v.42bis and MNP 5, and if something
supports MNP 5, it will usually, if not always, support MNP 1
through 4 too, but you should almost never worry about those. Just
take that v.32 or v.32bis number and compare it with all the
modems you connect to on a regular basis. If it matches, good. If
not, 2,400 is a nice even number that you'll get used to seeing
after CONNECT.
One caveat to this. The commonly-used US Robotics line of modems
uses a proprietary standard called HST, which is not v.anything.
Thus, two HST modems achieve high speeds talking to each other,
but a different v.32 modem must step down to the highest common
speed of 2,400 bps. US Robotics also has a Dual Standard modem,
which supports v.32bis as well as HST, and that one works fine
with v.32bis modems from other companies.
Actual Connections
------------------
That said, I tried these modems with a bunch of others that I
normally work with. On the whole, both modems worked well,
although I experienced more quirks than I would have liked, and
I'm now fluent in the Hayes command set. I connected to (as far as
I know, and with the highest speed I could reach after each one) a
Telebit TrailBlazer Plus (2,400 bps), a Telebit T2500 (v.32 =
9,600 bps), a Telebit WorldBlazer (v.32bis = 14,400 bps), a US
Robotics HST (2,400 bps), a US Robotics Dual Standard (v.32bis =
14,400 bps), and several other v.32 and v.32bis whose
manufacturers I don't know. Both the PPI and the Supra connected
equally well and transferred files equally well to all of these
modems with one exception. For some reason I couldn't figure out,
the Supra would not connect to the WorldBlazer at v.32bis. Instead
I had to lock the connection speed at 9,600 bps (v.32), after
which it worked fine with the WorldBlazer. That may be a quirk
with my particular setup, or it may have been fixed by one of
Supra's ROM upgrades since then.
In both cases, using ZMODEM to transfer files over the fastest
possible connection satisfied my longing for speed. Uploading 30K
issues of TidBITS, which used to take about 90 seconds at 2,400
bps now takes about 11 seconds. Massive QuickTime movies and
HyperCard stacks might take fifteen minutes, but you'll be hard
pressed to download anything for much longer than that. Gone are
the days of hour-long downloads.
Modem Software
--------------
Software on the other end can play a role too. Connecting to
CompuServe, which supports v.32, works fine, but you only enjoy a
speed increase in uploading and downloading files. Transferring
mail and forum messages in Navigator doesn't go much faster, and
it's not worth the significantly higher connect charges for most
people. If you download files from CompuServe regularly, work out
a system for transferring files at a high speed, then hanging up
and getting mail and messages at 2,400 bps.
Similarly, America Online (AOL) doesn't yet support speeds faster
than 2,400 bps, partly from a software standpoint and partly
because they probably haven't figured out how to charge for it
yet. Users have been screaming for the faster lines and software
on AOL's end to support them for some time, and Steve Case,
president of America Online, has assured us that it will happen in
the near future, although that was months ago. I don't use GEnie
or Prodigy, but again, it doesn't matter what speed you can use if
they can't match it in hardware and software. Check that, because
the claims about a faster modem paying for itself in reduced
connect charges may not apply to your specific situation. Sad but
true.
If you connect to an Internet machine, I expect that you will have
more luck in finding fast modems and appropriate software on the
remote end. In addition, generic mainframes seldom have speed
limitations on their dial-up lines because those dial-up lines
essentially emulate a directly-connected terminal. Reading Usenet
with nn or rn becomes a joy rather than a bore, and if your site
has the latest and greatest software, you might be able to use
SLIP and one of the many useful free or shareware programs
that require a SLIP connection. I recently set up a SLIP
connection, and have seen throughputs as high as 1,700 characters
per second (roughly 17,000 bps) with compression on a v.32bis
connection.
Extra Features
--------------
As time passes, modem companies become more aware of ways to ease
telecommunication. Flashing lights have long been the modem's only
interface to the outside world, but both the Supra and the PPI
have gone beyond that, especially the PPI. Supra provides a two-
letter LED display that lets you know what the modem thinks is
happening, and after you connect, the display rotates between
telling you about the connection speed, data compression, error
correction, and the like. PPI raised the ante on this neat and
extremely useful feature with a 12 character LCD display that
shows more readable and verbose messages. I quickly became
addicted to the PPI display, and my only quibble is that you have
to orient the modem so that you can see it straight on. The PPI
also has more little lights, but frankly, other than off-hook, and
send and receive data, they don't tell me anything useful. Stick
with these displays, modem makers!
Both modems report on their version numbers and all that, but PPI
added an additional diagnostic, ATI6, which gives information
about the last session, including number of characters, octets
(close relatives of the ocelot), packets, and NAKs (related to the
common YAK) sent and received, the last number called, the
connection time, modes and protocols used, and finally, how the
call was terminated. I don't use it often, but every now and then
I refer to this information to figure out what happened with a
connection.
Supra added a photocopied sheet to their package with tips and the
best configuration strings for the common Macintosh programs. I'm
sure PPI has the same sort of information around, and I would have
appreciated a similar sheet with the PPI modem. For instance, it's
going to take a while to figure out that you can't use hardware
handshaking with Mike O'Connor's CompuServe Navigator, and it may
take some time to find the &K4 string to shut it off.
Both modems come with dramatically improved manuals from previous
modems I've seen, but even still, the bulk of each manual is
devoted to listing all the various parts of the modem's command
set and what the different variables do. I rate the manuals about
equally because both provide useful information in normal English.
Nonetheless, I would have liked to have seen more basic
information about different protocols and compression modes. I
know at least PPI has a free brochure on that subject, so why not
put that information in the manual? If you are interested in
getting the free brochure, call PPI at the number below and ask
for it.
Both modems include fax and data software, MicroPhone 1.6 and
FaxSTF for the Supra, and Quick Link II Fax for the PPI. I suppose
that's good for novice users, but I feel that people who want a
good simple communications program for the Mac will use the
shareware ZTerm, and those who want more power will look to
MicroPhone II 4.0 or White Knight. Nonetheless, it's good to have
something to play with immediately if you don't already have a
communications program.
You might like one neat little feature that the PPI has that other
modems may share. It converts letters to numbers, so you can put
numbers like 1-900/TAX-HELP into your automatic dialer and the
modem will dial the appropriate numbers for those letters.
Incidentally, you need a special hardware handshaking cable for
these modems to reach their true potential. This is something of a
non-issue, since both companies bundle hardware handshaking cables
with their Mac packages, but if your modem comes without one of
those cables, you'll have to buy one separately (from the modem
companies or from MacConnection) for about $15.
Support
-------
Modems are perhaps the most-trouble free pieces of common computer
peripheral. I say that based on their incredibly long warranties,
five years for the Supra and a lifetime warranty for the PPI.
Nevertheless, I've seen a number of reports of modems being dead
on arrival, so support carries a fair amount of importance. In
addition, during the first few weeks of use as you gradually
connect to more and more high-speed modems, you may need help in
figuring out the best configuration strings. Finally, although a
modem's programming is burned into a chip, modem companies do
occasionally, or even frequently, update those ROMs to add
features or fix bugs. Both Supra and PPI have issued several ROM
upgrades since shipping the modems.
I had a doozy of a support problem that isn't related to either of
the modems, but which gave me a good sense of the level of
support. The day I installed both modems, my UUCP mail host
upgraded its modems to Telebit WorldBlazers. Since that day, I
have not been able to send to that machine with either of the new
modems or with my old 2,400 bps modem, using any program or
protocol. I've even tried it not only from my SE/30, but also from
our PowerBook 100 and Classic. Receiving works fine, but sending
fails, though not always in the same place, and slowing down the
speed usually increases the time before the first packet time-out.
Even stranger, other people with the same modems, the same
computers, and the same software can send files to this machine
with no trouble, and I even used a neighbor's phone line briefly
to make sure my phone line hadn't changed. We're talking the
communication problem from hell here, and we have no clue how to
fix it, although we've determined it even happens when my Mac is
directly connected to the Vax via a long cable. As I said, I now
speak the Hayes command set fluently because I've changed
literally every setting that could affect the connection.
First I called each company's tech support people, and received
little help. Both technicians said that the problem obviously
wasn't with their modem, so they couldn't help me. True, but I
would have appreciated any suggestions they could have provided.
Next I asked on CompuServe, where both companies offer support.
PPI's tech support staff there, Paul Hansen and Marty Azarani,
offered numerous suggestions and hints, and sent me a new front
panel for the PPI modem (mine had a bad LED for transmit) and a
new ROM to fix some fax difficulties among other things. The
process was absolutely no hassle - just a message outlining what I
needed and where to send it, and from the messages I've seen,
everyone gets the same level of support. Though not quite at the
level of the support I received from PPI, Supra's online support
was good as well. The only drawback here is that you need a
CompuServe account to easily receive this excellent service,
although you can send Internet email to Supra and Paul Hansen of
PPI will try to help via email as well, although without the
thread context, he will have more trouble keeping what's happening
straight. Paul said that he's in the process of setting up an
Internet account (see below for addresses).
Fax Galore
----------
Well, not really. I include fax capabilities in my "v.everything"
tagline, and both of these modems have it, and both come with
appropriate fax software. That's the good news. The bad news is
that my success rate with receiving and sending faxes has been
low, although there are several reasons for that.
The Supra comes with FaxSTF from STF Technologies, and I have few
complaints about FaxSTF. STF designed a decent interface, the
software handles most things automatically (like bringing up a
non-modal status window automatically when a fax comes in), and
offers features you might normally want from a fax machine. My few
complaints are that STF isn't great about sharing the serial port
with other communications programs and that it includes a lot of
pieces, including two DAs, an application, a Control Panel, an
extension, and Chooser device. That's a lot to keep straight, and
the fact that you have to configure most everything from within
the Chooser device bothers me. I'd like STF to bring the number of
pieces down to an extension that sends and receives and has a
Control Panel interface for configuring the software, a single DA
for feedback and sending quick text faxes, and the otherwise nice
application for managing phone books and viewing faxes.
FaxSTF insists on taking over the modem if you turn on auto-
answer, and not all communications programs deal well with making
FaxSTF relinquish control of the serial port. My automatic mail
sessions in America Online, uAccess, and Navigator all work, but
often I come in to see that the modem is no longer auto-answering
and that uAccess is complaining about not being able to access the
serial port. Still, I could suffer with FaxSTF the way it stands,
and in conjunction with the Supra modem it worked about half of
the time. Perhaps one of the ROM upgrades will help.
QuickLink II Fax from Smith Micro originally had real problems. I
can overlook the functional troubles for the moment, since I was
working with a beta version and most of the functional problems
seem to have disappeared, although when QuickLink II has Fax
Receiving on, at least uAccess cannot access the serial port. (PPI
owners on CompuServe can get the latest software by asking in the
Practical Peripherals forum, GO PPIFORUM, or you can call PPI and
order it, with disk and manual, for $34.95.) More serious in my
opinion are the problems with the interface. QLIIFax has two basic
interface problems. First, the fax software comes in the same
program as a normal telecommunications program, so you can use it
for calling BBSs as well as sending faxes. This may sound good,
but the telecom part of the program is unimpressive, if
functional, and doesn't support ZMODEM. Including menus with data
and fax commands clutters and confuses the interface
significantly. Second, although Smith Micro significantly revamped
the interface when I and other complained about it, I'm still not
impressed. It's prettier and there are fewer modal dialogs, but it
still doesn't look or work as smoothly as FaxSTF.
In both apps, the procedure for creating a fax is simple - merely
choose the fax driver in the Chooser and print the document. You
can either send the document immediately or schedule sending for a
later date. Of course, no matter what you do (even with using
TrueType or ATM fonts, a necessity for faxing), the document will
look ugly on the other end and in most cases will print on non-
recyclable paper. Frankly, although I admit their utility, I think
faxes generally waste paper. Although I don't know if they have
released it yet, STF is working on a program that does optical
character recognition on incoming faxes, turning them from disk-
hungry bitmaps into usable, editable text files. More power to
them, and if possible, we'll review it here.
I suspect that when all is said and done, both modems will
eventually work equally well at sending and receiving faxes,
although people I've spoken with say that fax modems are never as
reliable as regular fax machines, which is a shame. I have had
trouble primarily with receiving faxes, which currently arrive
successfully about 10% of the time. At the moment, I have to give
the nod to the Supra modem and its FaxSTF software, or to a the
PPI modem with the additional purchase of FaxSTF (which you can
buy separately, and it's included in MicroPhone Pro from Software
Ventures), for those who anticipate using the fax features often.
Others have also recommended the Global Village modems and their
proprietary software, but I've never even seen it.
FaxMania
--------
T/Maker sent me a copy of ClickArt for Faxes a while back, before
I had a working fax modem (and they included candy with the review
copy, an excellent policy that I recommend to the rest of the
industry). It's a neat idea if you send a lot of otherwise boring
faxes, because it's composed of a collection of cover sheets in
various formats, including Word, WriteNow, MacWrite, and MacPaint.
You can snazz up your faxes with these cover sheets, but you may
not find all the sentiments entirely to your liking, although you
can easily edit them. That's a personal decision and not something
I can judge easily. I know that there were only two cover sheets
with penguins on them, something I could use more of. :-)
My complaint about ClickArt for Faxes is that these fax programs
already have a feature that automatically generates a cover sheet,
so if you use these, you must remember to shut off the automatic
cover sheet or you'll look dumb. Otherwise, ClickArt for Faxes is
a simple and inexpensive ($69 list) way to have fun, and the world
can use more of that.
T/Maker -- 415/962-0195 -- 415/962-0201 (fax)
Conclusions
-----------
If you want a new modem and you have an excuse to buy a fast one,
I recommend either of these units. If you only connect at 2,400
bps, you can probably go for a cheaper 2,400 bps data/9,600 bps
fax modem. Otherwise, the price is right for what these modems
provide in terms of the fastest data transmission commonly
available and the added send and receive fax capabilities that
businesses find useful.
That doesn't answer your question, though, about which of the two
to purchase. In most ways, the modems are similar, so it comes
down to specifics. For my uses, the PPI gains a slight edge
because of the one quirk with the Supra in talking to the
WorldBlazer and the neat LCD display. I seldom use faxes if I can
help it because I don't approve of them, so PPI's Quick Link II
Fax software doesn't bother me as much as it would otherwise.
Finally, I'm unlikely to travel with this modem at all, so the
PPI's larger size doesn't bother me. In summary then, I think the
PPI is a slightly better primarily-data modem for desk use. The
Supra has far better fax software, is cheaper, and is much smaller
(although it runs hotter because it uses the metal case as a heat
sink). I took it to Boston for Macworld and found it a good
traveling modem, though certainly not as small as some. You won't
go wrong with either modem, but it might be worth checking into
other modems that these two companies have released in the
meantime. Supra has an internal PowerBook modem, and PPI
introduced a tiny pocket modem, both of which might be better
suited to travelling if you do a lot of it.
Details
-------
PM14400FXSA
Practical Peripherals, Inc.
375 Conejo Ridge Avenue
Thousand Oaks CA 91361
805/497-4774
805/374-7200 (fax)
Paul Hansen -- 76702.475@compuserve.com
Marty Azarani -- 70314.3357@compuserve.com
Alan Engle of Smith Micro -- 76703.4401@compuserve.com
SupraFAXModem v.32bis
Supra Corporation
7101 Supra Drive SW
Albany, OR 97321
503/967-2400
503/967-2401 (fax)
supratech@supra.uucp
supratech%supra.uucp@cs.orst.edu
Jason Collins of STF Technologies -- 74740.1244@compuserve.com
..
This text is wrapped as a setext. For more information send email
with the single word "setext" (no quotes) in the Subject: line to
<fileserver@tidbits.com>.
For information on TidBITS, how to subscribe to our mailing list,
how to find back issues, how to search issues on the Internet's
WAIS, and other useful stuff, send email to <info@tidbits.com>.