In a message dated Thu, 3 Aug 2000 6:53:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Neil H. Enet" <nilugo@usa.net> writes:
<< I was wondering what other "experimental" (or simply
wonderful/great) cuban music CDs you'd recommend.
Thanks in advance >>
1999's Tony Martinez and The Cuban Power's _Mafarefun_ is absolutely phenomenal- one of the best Latin jazz CDs ever, IMO. Tito Puente/Eddie Palmieri's just-released _Masterpiece/Obra Maestra_ is a great fusion of Latin dance and jazz with a wall of horns. Irakere is hit and miss, but the _Best of_ on Columbia and _Live at Ronnie Scott's_ are both great outings. Puente's _Mambo Birdland_ is another worth checking out. Chucho Valdes and Paquito Rivera (both ex-Irakere) both have several albums worth checking out. Cubanismo! have 3 CDs of pre-Castro-styled music that are all wonderful. NG LaBanda (an offshoot of Irakere) have 3 CDs that are great. Machete Ensemble...did I mention them...?
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I would add that NBI:RS is also the Kirk album that Zorn cites in the notorious
Radio Show cd. I've been enjoying "Blacknuss" myself lately, and
have got my eye on the Mercury box set. I've really listened to the
Dog Years box more than any other Kirk...and have heard the Warner Brothers
compilation and the Mercury "two-fer" of "Don't You Cry Beautiful Edith..."
but not much else.
<p>Any nice and obscure Kirk references out there?
<p>Matt
<br>
<p>Julian wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><font face="Arial"><font size=-1> Anyway, what
I didn't know is that the third CD is actually "Natural Black Inventions:
Root Strata", which features Kirk playing nearly everything himself (with
no overdubs, that is) and playing all sorts of horns at once, plus a lot
of percussion. Towards the end it gets a bit stale, but it's certainly
an interesting CD, and a great bonus for "Dog Years..."</font></font><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><a href="http://www.hartingdale.com.au/~jcurwin"></a></font></font> </blockquote>
>and, for the first time in the States, about 25 years later than >they should have, "Get Up With It".
Do you mean CD? I have a domestic LP release of this. But they're all great albums. Just think: in ten years there will be Super-Maxi-DVD releases of all the unedited 70s Miles recordings so we can make our own mixes!
>Two programs ago he advised listeners to tape his broadcast of his >own re-mastering of the Hot 5s and 7s; apparently he had done a >cleanup job which isn't scheduled for release. In general,
Though with the radio compression the clean-up might not make much difference.
In a message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2000 8:34:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, TagYrIt@aol.com writes:
<< In a message dated 8/10/00 7:57:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
jzitt@metatronpress.com writes:
<<
Long ago, I had a 4 (?) LP set of various oddities of theirs. What I
recall most fondly was a BBC recording of "The Moon in June".
>>
<G> 3 LP box, with a great booklet, called Triple Echo, which as far as I
know was British only.
>>
Which also included both sides of those first two great Soft Machine singles, one of which was "Love Makes Sweet Music"- probably my favorite pop single of all time. Why this has never seen a legit re-issue is beyond me. A 30-second bit of it as introduced by John Peel appeared on a Gong compilation a while back (_History and Mystery_ is the title, I think...) , but nothing since then. A real shame!!
In a message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2000 6:42:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Marcin Gokieli" <marcin.gokieli@mospan.pl> writes:
<< I had an album called 'Softs', wihich is quite worthless IMHO: a kind of early mahavishnu rip-off. Seriously boring.
>>
I have a soft (oops...) spot for _Softs_, as it was a favorite of a long-departed friend of mine. Jon Ethridge makes his debut as a SM'er here, fresh off the heels of a stint in Darryl Way's Wolf. It's a most unique album in the SM catalogue, ranging in style from jazz/metal fusion to almost Berlin school-styled electronics. Not exactly one for the SM neophyte, admittedly, but one I enjoy on occasion. We miss you Tony...:-(
> Does anyone on the list no anything about the huge new Rhino Box Set.
I seem to remember it being scheduled for late 2000 or early 2001 but that might be one of those false memories The Conspiracy planted to prevent me from testifying about the existence of leprechauns. & yes it's supposed to be the "complete" Atlantic recordings.
> >NP Eugene Chadbourne & Paul Lovens (Leo Records)
> How is this? I saw it, but again, haven't had a chance to hear it.
This is a typical Chadbourne release -- which to me is always a bit disappointing. it is very hit and miss, there's some good stuff, and quite a bit of bad. And the sound on some of it is pretty poor. It probably would have made a really good single disc, but stretching it over 2 wasn't necessary. And Loven's doesn't come through the way I was hoping.
> Also, has anyone heard that CD "The Zu Side of
>Eugene Chadbourne" with that Italian
> band? If so, how is that one?
I like this one a lot. Loud, rockish, and fun.
I'd also like to put in a plug for a 'radio CD release party' for a new Chadbourne album next week. It is a Chadbourne/Vertrek Ensemble disc recorded last spring. Vertrek are coming into the studio with me, we'll be playing the disc, they're bringing instruments and will be playing, and we're hoping to get Chadbourne on the phone (which may be a problem, because he is in Sicily that night). Anyway, the station is broadcast over the web in quicktime, found at www.cjsr.com. Next Thursday, September 1 at 8pm Mountain time (10 eastern, 11 pacific, anyone else figure it out for yourself).
Also, if anyone wants the disc before the usual distributors get it, contact me and I'll pass the message on.
>Check out the following review from the Phoenix New Times if
Pretty funny. "Would you rather hear a jackhammer or a car crash?" Of course the correct answer is "Both, please." (At least this guy gave the albums plenty of space & description, enough that if I was still a teenager who'd never even heard of Coltrane or Coleman I'd immediately rush out and buy the albums.)
> (At least this guy gave the albums plenty of space & description, enough that if I was still a teenager who'd never even heard of Coltrane or Coleman I'd immediately rush out and buy the albums.)
I hadn't thought of that. You're quite correct.
Steve
ssmith36@sprynet.com
NP - Miles Davis & John Coltrane, "On Green Dolphin Street," 'Live in Stockholm 1960' (Dragon)
From: "Patrice L. Roussel" <proussel@ichips.intel.com>
Subject: Re: sponsorship
Date: 23 Aug 2000 10:40:59 -0700
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:34:46 -0700 "Mike Biffle" wrote:
>
> >> sponsoring IS the real world - but not for music margins. so it was just as well that hat hut was getting it. I bet you that the hat hut money will now go to something really crappy
>
> > But Werner Uhlinger (spelling?), the owner of Hat Hut, is a rich man, if I remember well. This means that he also has powerful connections. At least he applied from sponsorship, the banks might have
thought: "If a serious man like Werner asks to money that might be for something worthwhile." Patrice (guessing).
>
> This is a good example of money making more money! Quite the (un)funny
> paradox... God forbid banks loaning money to people who actually need it!
I doubt that this a good example (unless you have a twisted sense of what
good means). Putting money in producing records is not something people
do to make more money... At least not in the genres that Hat Hut focuses
>sponsoring IS the real world - but not for music margins. so it was
Maybe in Europe but not the US where really only the music margins are sponsored, usually classical labels like New World or CRI and possibly others like Folkways (now owned by Smithsonian, ie the US Government or the American people take your pick) counts.
>but I think it's safe to say that the new wave of electronics >improvisers, especially the ones working with sine waves, have
I've run across several references to this but not much detail. Who are some of these people? Do you mean literal sine waves (which are pretty dull) or is that more a shorthand for something else? Are they making interference/modulation patterns? And in what way is this improvised?
> Could one of you explain what those sine waves are?
It's the "purest" sound tone, on paper/oscilloscope it looks like the graph of a sine function (basically a completely regular/predictable up and down wave) thus the name. Sort of a beeeeeeee with no overtones, dirtiness, whathaveyou. I don't think audio sine waves occur naturally but could be wrong. Sine waves of different frequencies or that are out of sync will create interference patterns as well.
The Aquarius Records mailings have interesting sounding descriptions of some underground metal & Merzbow puts in a good word in The Wire. But does anybody know if there is actually any of this that really lives up to that? I listen to the metal shows periodically on local radio and they do play a lot of black/death/underground metal but it all seems so unimaginative and tedious. Is there better out there?
I am by no means an expert on the underground stuff that AQ talks about. I would also like to hear some of it that they hype so well.
Some friends convinced me to try early Slayer, Venom, Metallica (well, only some tracks on Kill 'em All), but what really got me converted to Black Metal was hearing Napalm Death's "Scum" and Carcass's "Reek of Putrefaction" I unqualifiedly (is that a word?) recommend these records as listenable and strange worlds to visit, but I don't live there.
I kinda like Burzum, Morbid Angel, and Pan.Thy.Monium. I've yet to find any Mayhem, who are supposed to be the pinnacle of black metal.
matt
wlt4@mindspring.com wrote:
> The Aquarius Records mailings have interesting sounding descriptions of some underground metal & Merzbow puts in a good word in The Wire. But does anybody know if there is actually any of this that really lives up to that? I listen to the metal shows periodically on local radio and they do play a lot of black/death/underground metal but it all seems so unimaginative and tedious. Is there better out there?
In a message dated Tue, 29 Aug 2000 8:52:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Matt Laferty <bg60009@binghamton.edu> writes:
<< Hi all
I just got back from the CD store, which makes everyone here happy, and
picked up some stuff that I'm excited about: Panthalessa, The Beach Boys
"Friends/20/20", Esquivel, Otha Turner's Afrosippi Allstars, Eddie
Cochran double cd... >>
Quite a diverse selection of stuff there. The Beach Boys' _Friends/20/20_ 2fer is an oft-overlooked gem by those who know the group only from the _Pet Sounds_ axis. Really great harmonies here. _Panthalessa_ is a delight anytime- I really enjoy it.
<< But I didn't get:
The Essential King Crimson 4cd box
(snip)
And I've got a few King Crimson records, is the box a waste? >>
Isn't this box set comprised of the Projects stuff? If so, it's their more "ambient/exploratory/jam" than most of KC's output. I tend to gravitate toward the early KC stuff ala _Red_ and earlier...
Nice to be able to discuss some pseudo/non-Zorn here. I keep waiting for the complaints to mount...
Well, the good thing it is, is that it's not necessarily non-zorn related:
Our man Z cites both Esquivel and Brian Wilson in his "Radio Hour," and his New Yorker magazine interview namedrops electric miles and field recordings from everywhere, ala the Otha Turner (which turns field recordings on its head, by mixing unashamedly
the musical traditions). So I'd argue that it's all appropriately zorny.
(now that zorn is no longer a proper noun, but some kind of descriptor of something...)
I don't know about the King Crimson...I remember a 1991 date on it, and I think the discs had years on them...I was awash in records...I can't be sure. I'm hoping for "rarities" or something...
Thanks--this is looking to be a pricier week than I imagined. Good thing on Thursdays theres a buy 3 get one free...
Matt
Dgasque@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated Tue, 29 Aug 2000 8:52:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Matt Laferty <bg60009@binghamton.edu> writes:
>
> << Hi all
>
> I just got back from the CD store, which makes everyone here happy, and
> picked up some stuff that I'm excited about: Panthalessa, The Beach Boys
> "Friends/20/20", Esquivel, Otha Turner's Afrosippi Allstars, Eddie
> Cochran double cd... >>
>
> Quite a diverse selection of stuff there. The Beach Boys' _Friends/20/20_ 2fer is an oft-overlooked gem by those who know the group only from the _Pet Sounds_ axis. Really great harmonies here. _Panthalessa_ is a delight anytime- I really enjoy it.
>
> << But I didn't get:
>
> The Essential King Crimson 4cd box
> (snip)
>
> And I've got a few King Crimson records, is the box a waste? >>
>
> Isn't this box set comprised of the Projects stuff? If so, it's their more "ambient/exploratory/jam" than most of KC's output. I tend to gravitate toward the early KC stuff ala _Red_ and earlier...
>
> Nice to be able to discuss some pseudo/non-Zorn here. I keep waiting for the complaints to mount...
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:24:53PM -0400, Dgasque@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated Tue, 29 Aug 2000 8:52:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Matt Laferty <bg60009@binghamton.edu> writes:
> The Essential King Crimson 4cd box
> (snip)
>
> And I've got a few King Crimson records, is the box a waste? >>
>
> Isn't this box set comprised of the Projects stuff? If so, it's their more "ambient/exploratory/jam" than most of KC's output. I tend to gravitate toward the early KC stuff ala _Red_ and earlier...
That's what I thought he meant too, until i checked a discography. I
believe he saw "Frame by Frame: The Essential King Crimson", a
collection of 1969-1980s material, including a disk of at-the-time
otherwise-unreleased live stuff.
--
|> ~The only thing that is not art is inattention~ --- Marcel Duchamp <|
> Subject: Re: Braxton solo in question (was: genres)
>
> Kristopher S. Handley wrote:
>
> > I checked the archives and still I'm not sure which Brax solo Nils and Mike
> > were talking about. FOR ALTO? OR something new?
>
> Yep, FOR ALTO, recently re-issued on Delmark, along with Muhal's THINGS
> TO COME FROM THOSE NOW GONE and a Kalaparusha album. The Brax is
> essential, just an amazing recording. All the more for the confidence
> and conception shown by a 23-year old Braxton. The Abrams is a bit of a
> mixed bag, imo, but there are a few stand-out tracks including one of
> the very best things he ever recorded, 'The March of the Transients', a
> great free-bop number.
>
> Brian Olewnick
I just picked up For Alto two days ago, and haven't had a chance to give it a proper listen yet. I've tried three times, and always ended up having to leave before I got more than 1/2 way into it. But what I heard, I liked. Much more raw than latter solo stuff, I think.
I didn't know that the Abrams disc was also issued -- I'll have to look at the store to see if it is there. It sounds like a typical Abrams disc -- i find almost everything he has recorded to be a bit spotty, with some dead wood mixed into lots of amazing material. Always worth buying, however.
What's the Kalaparusha disc? Don't know much about him, but generally liked the bits I've heard.
> I didn't know that the Abrams disc was also issued -- I'll have to look at the store to see if it is there. It sounds like a typical Abrams disc -- i find almost everything he has recorded to be a bit spotty, with some dead wood mixed into lots of amazing material. Always worth buying, however.
I think you're generally correct, though "Sightsong" the 1975 duo with
Malachi Favors is superb virtually throughout, as is most of "Afrisong"