home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
pub
/
lists
/
movies
/
archive
/
v02.n078
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1998-08-27
|
50KB
From: owner-movies-digest@lists.xmission.com (movies-digest)
To: movies-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: movies-digest V2 #78
Reply-To: movies-digest
Sender: owner-movies-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-movies-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
movies-digest Friday, August 28 1998 Volume 02 : Number 078
[MV] Mamet!!!
Re: [MV] david fincher -Reply
Re: [MV] Twists.......
Re: [MV] Ever After
Re: [MV] The Game
[MV] Ever After
[MV] Aliens II vs III
RE: [MV] david fincher -Reply
[MV] Movie News - 08/28/98
Re: [MV] Ever After
Re: [MV] Aliens II vs III
Re: [MV] 54
[MV] Blade
[MV] The Movie Report#156, 8/28/98
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:32:43 +0100
From: "Gerald Taylor" <geeg@vossnet.co.uk>
Subject: [MV] Mamet!!!
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0067_01BDD26F.3083F8C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=20
>Yes!! We have so much fun in the supermarket, people staring at us as =
if we
>were having an actual conversation.... evil I know, but I'm working on =
it...
My God!! It was'nt the "Brass balls" speech was it! :-)
Incidentally, have you seen "Oleanna" ? It's one of those films that =
starts poorly but then sucks you in totally. Very stagey but the plot =
evolves into a real "Shout at the screen" experience.
You really should write longer posts, you are quite amusing. What are =
some of your favourite movies?~
Gerry T
~~~~~
I think I could turn and live with animals, they are so placid and self =
contained,
I stand and look at them long and long.
They do not sweat and whine about their condition,
They do not lie awake and weep for their sins,
they do not make me sick discussing their duty to God,
not one is dissatisfied, not one demented with the mania of owning =
things,
Not one kneels to another nor to his own kind that lived thousands of =
years ago,
not one is respectable or unhappy over the whole earth.
Walt =
Whitman.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- ------=_NextPart_000_0067_01BDD26F.3083F8C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR><BR> </DIV>
<DIV></FONT>>Yes!! We have so much fun in the supermarket, =
people=20
staring at us as if we<BR>>were having an actual conversation.... =
evil I=20
know, but I'm working on it...<BR></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D4>My God!! It was'nt the =
"Brass=20
balls" speech was it! :-)</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#000000 =
size=3D4></FONT></STRONG><STRONG><FONT=20
size=3D4>Incidentally, have you seen "Oleanna" ? It's =
one of those=20
films that starts poorly but then sucks you in totally. Very =
stagey but=20
the plot evolves into a real "Shout at the screen"=20
experience.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=3D4></FONT></STRONG><STRONG><FONT size=3D4>You =
really should=20
write longer posts, you are quite amusing. What are some of your =
favourite=20
movies?~<BR>Gerry T<BR>~~~~~<BR>I think I could turn and live with =
animals, they=20
are so placid and self contained,<BR>I stand and look at them long and=20
long.<BR>They do not sweat and whine about their condition,<BR>They do =
not lie=20
awake and weep for their sins,<BR>they do not make me sick discussing =
their duty=20
to God,<BR>not one is dissatisfied, not one demented with the mania of =
owning=20
things,<BR>Not one kneels to another nor to his own kind that lived =
thousands of=20
years ago,<BR>not one is respectable or unhappy over the whole=20
earth.<BR> &nb=
sp; &nbs=
p;  =
; =
&=
nbsp; =20
Walt=20
Whitman.<BR>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</FONT></STRONG><BR><B=
R><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0067_01BDD26F.3083F8C0--
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 12:10:42 +0200
From: manuel morrens <mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be>
Subject: Re: [MV] david fincher -Reply
- --------------6423DB8EF0C0BA1D0B523323
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bruce Bridges wrote:
> Concerning David Fincher: While I think he has developed into a very
> good director, I think Alien 3 sucked and has no place in the series.
>
>
> Everybody has their bad days.
>
I agree with bruce...I mean, guys, really, alien3 (alien resurrection
as well for that matter) really really stinked. Alien was pretty good
and I just loved Aliens...
Seven was a good movie, it just wasn't THAT good as everybody
thinks..mass hystery I suppose....
But The Game ...wow dude ...THAT was an awsome thing to see man!!!
looking forward for the next Fincher.....
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuel Morrens mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be
Department of Medicine http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties
Brussels Free University (lyrics of the eighties)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------6423DB8EF0C0BA1D0B523323
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
Bruce Bridges wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Concerning David Fincher: While I think he
has developed into a very
<BR>good director, I think Alien 3 sucked and has no place in the series.
<BR>
<P>Everybody has their bad days.
<BR> </BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree with bruce...I mean, guys, really, alien3 (alien resurrection
as well for that matter) really really stinked. Alien was pretty good and
I just loved Aliens...
<BR>Seven was a good movie, it just wasn't THAT good as everybody thinks..mass
hystery I suppose....
<BR>But The Game ...wow dude ...THAT was an awsome thing to see man!!!
<PRE>looking forward for the next Fincher.....
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuel Morrens mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be
Department of Medicine <A HREF="http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties">http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties</A>
Brussels Free University (lyrics of the eighties)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------</PRE>
</HTML>
- --------------6423DB8EF0C0BA1D0B523323--
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 12:14:13 +0200
From: manuel morrens <mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be>
Subject: Re: [MV] Twists.......
- --------------C31E321F3F9DA316496B0B56
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Gerald Taylor wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry about the spelling! I thought the game was poor, the
> ending was extremely silly and a cop out of the highest
> order. When you mention "Diabolique", do you mean the
> S.Stone version? If so, all I can say is that you should
> try to see the original " Les diaboliques" directed by
> Henri-George Clouzet in 1954. It is by far the better
> version as the re-make softens the ending. It should be
> available on videotape as should the same director's "Wages
> of fear" ( it has been remade in the states as the sorceror
> but is supposed to be poor)which is even better! The same
> goes for "The vanishing". The original dutch version is
> excellent and has a far better ending.
>
> L.A confidential was good but in the book Dudley Smith
> survives! Now would that not have made an even better
> ending!?
>
> In answer to the other poster.....yup "The usual suspects"
> was excellent.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I agree on The Vanishing, it's typical for Hollywood to create some
happy end...
By the way did you see A Perfect Murder(Douglas/Paltrow) ...I liked it
as well.... ok ok it was a Hitchcock-remake...but still... pretty good
movie ...
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuel Morrens mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be
Department of Medicine http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties
Brussels Free University (lyrics of the eighties)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------C31E321F3F9DA316496B0B56
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
Gerald Taylor wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<BR>
<P><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=+1>Sorry about the spelling!
I thought the game was poor, the ending was extremely silly and a cop out
of the highest order. When you mention "Diabolique", do you mean
the S.Stone version? If so, all I can say is that you should try
to see the original " Les diaboliques" directed by Henri-George Clouzet
in 1954. It is by far the better version as the re-make softens the
ending. It should be available on videotape as should the same director's
"Wages of fear" ( it has been remade in the states as the sorceror but
is supposed to be poor)which is even better! The same goes for "The
vanishing". The original dutch version is excellent and has a far
better ending.</FONT></FONT></B>
<P><B><FONT SIZE=+1>L.A confidential was good but in the book Dudley Smith
survives! Now would that not have made an even better ending!?</FONT></B>
<P><B><FONT SIZE=+1>In answer to the other poster.....yup "The usual suspects"
was excellent.</FONT></B>
<P><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=+1> </FONT></FONT></B>
<P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P> </BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree on The Vanishing, it's typical for Hollywood to create some
happy end...
<BR>By the way did you see A Perfect Murder(Douglas/Paltrow) ...I liked
it as well.... ok ok it was a Hitchcock-remake...but still... pretty good
movie ...
<PRE>--
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuel Morrens mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be
Department of Medicine <A HREF="http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties">http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties</A>
Brussels Free University (lyrics of the eighties)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------</PRE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
- --------------C31E321F3F9DA316496B0B56--
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 07:12:20 PDT
From: "Danielle Conkle" <danyelli@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MV] Ever After
>I recently saw Ever After this past weekend. I found it to be so
>wonderful. I was expecting to get a little confused with such an
ancient
>time setting, but I was completely wrong. Drew Barrymore did a
wonderful
>job portraying Cinderella (well a Cinderella-type, since her character
>wasnt named Cinderella). I thought that Anjelica Huston did a good job
>being that antagonist too.
>
>It was such a great movie, I recommend it with a 10 out of 10! Any
>comments??
I thought Ever After was pretty good, i was surprised it added
something different to the old story. I think Barrymore has really
cleaned up and she's been adorable in these last couple movies she's
done. Anjelica Huston did the best acting job, and even the sisters
played well. It was nice to have a prince who was attractive, but not
your usual gorgeous model type. The movie kept me laughing, but i'm not
sure if it was supposed to be funny....but how can you not laugh when
"she's only there for the food"? ;)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:13:37 +0800
From: "David Lee" <sashimi@mbox2.singnet.com.sg>
Subject: Re: [MV] The Game
Yes, I would have to agree... I went to watch the Game with high
expectations, given that it was a Sean Penn/Michael Douglas movie (I'm a
fan of Michael Douglas you see...) and what with all the hype about Jodie
Foster rejecting the role and all...
But I would have to say that the movie was generally (a tad) disappointing.
Not the ending though, before I discredit the movie too much. Then again, I
could be expecting quite a lot when I went to watch it...
"Here's wishing you good mental health...."
-- Frasier Crane
- ----------
> From: Danielle Conkle <danyelli@hotmail.com>
> To: movies@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: [MV] The Game
> Date: 28 August 1998 09:01
>
>
> > I didn't expect the twists in "the game" (...brilliant movie)
>
> All i can say for The Game, was it was an original idea. Other than
> that i did not find this movie enjoyable at all. Actually i found it
> annoying and when it was finally over i didn't feel relief...i felt
> anger. I was so revved up, i wanted to punch somebody. That wasn't
> living, that was playing with your life, living it in fear.
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> [ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
> [ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 07:29:21 -0700
From: mjohanson@earthlink.net
Subject: [MV] Ever After
"'Ever After' is a frothy delight -- it's a little bit Renaissance
Festival, a little bit Monty Python, and a whole lotta fun. A
feminist updating of the Cinderella fairy tale, it never hits
you over the head with its attitude and never takes itself too
seriously."
I loved "Ever After" too -- see my full review at
http://www.flickfilosopher.com/flickfilos/archive/3q98/everafter.html
MaryAnn Johanson
The Flick Filosopher
http://www.flickfilosopher.com
------------------
Tonya wrote:
I recently saw Ever After this past weekend. I found it to be
so
wonderful.... Any comments??
- -----
Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html )
The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere!
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:15:52 cet
From: "greuel" <greuel@eifel-net.net>
Subject: [MV] Aliens II vs III
> I agree with bruce...I mean, guys, really, alien3 (alien resurrection
> as well for that matter) really really stinked. Alien was pretty good
> and I just loved Aliens...
I'm surprised at all the raving about the 2nd Alien. I did not like it at
all. The idea about the first one was that there is a creature of utter
beauty. The beauty of perfection. The original alien is so highly
developed that only Ripley's wit can overcome it. In the 2nd they are
degraded to canon fodder. There are hundreds of aliens against about
20 marines - and the only reason why the aliens can get their foot in
the door is because these marines are so dumb and stupid in their
macho behaviour, that they are wasy meat. The acid blood and the
intelligence of the Resurrection play no role whatsoever. And
Cameron started that "Mother" thing. While the idea is quite good -
mother alien vs. mother Ripley, he had to create a yet bigger alien.
Simply because the originals were no threat anymore. There is no
perfection in the 2nd alien. They can be killed by various means and
from every distance. The ultimate stand off by the two mothers are
ridiculous. Ripley with robot can beat mother alien? Doesn't really
sound convincing.
Plus, while Scott's Alien had stunning visuals and Fincher at least
attempted them, I didn't find any of that in Cameron. Sure, he is great
on FX, but working with the camera or lighting is not his speciality
and that prevents him from making visually exciting films to a large
degree. <-- Look! It's a period!
thomas
- ---
http://greuel.notrix.de/ - abomiNation
"One must still have chaos in one
to give birth to a dancing star"
Friedrich Nietzsche
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 08:49:30 -0700
From: "Romero, Leticia" <lromero@saonet.ucla.edu>
Subject: RE: [MV] david fincher -Reply
me too!!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: manuel morrens [SMTP:mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.be]
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 1998 3:11 AM
> To: movies@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [MV] david fincher -Reply
>
> Bruce Bridges wrote:
>
> Concerning David Fincher:á While I think he has developed into a
> very
> good director, I think Alien 3 sucked and has no place in the
> series.
> á
>
> Everybody has their bad days.
> á
>
> áI agree with bruce...I mean,á guys, really, alien3 (alien resurrection as
> well for that matter) really really stinked. Alien was pretty good and I
> just loved Aliens...
> Seven was a good movie, it just wasn't THAT good as everybody thinks..mass
> hystery I suppose....
> But The Game ...wow dude ...THAT was an awsome thing to see man!!!
> looking forward for the next Fincher.....á
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Manuel Morrensááááááááááááááááá mmorrens@minf.vub.ac.beááááááááá
> Department of Medicineááááááááá
> <http://minf.vub.ac.be/~mmorrens/eighties>
> Brussels Free Universityááááááá (lyrics of the eighties)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> á
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:32:32 -0600 (MDT)
From: The Reporter <gregorys@xmission.com>
Subject: [MV] Movie News - 08/28/98
Ben Stiller owes a lot of his career success to failure. The
star of "There's Something About Mary" and "Your Friends and
Neighbors" tells USA Weekend that things may have seemed
bleak not so long ago, but all the experiences paid off.
"You learn more from failures than successes," he says.
Among those bleak experiences was his 1992 Fox-TV "Ben
Stiller Show," which was last in the ratings but which gave
him valuable behind-the-lens experience. He then directed
Jim Carrey in "The Cable Guy" (a comedy that some fans found
too dark) and subsequently lost an opportunity to film a
movie about a Rolling Stones tour. Stiller, 32, credits his
famous parents, comedians Jerry Stiller and Anne Meara, with
teaching him to stay focused and committed and to be
resilient.
-=> * <=-
Los Angeles played host recently to the premiere party for
the Miramax film "54" about the famed New York discotheque
where the rich, famous and sometimes not-so-beautiful people
danced and did drugs into the wee hours of the late 1970s.
At the party, New York's Daily News reports, Thelma Houston,
a disco diva of the era, belted out her hit "Don't Leave Me
This Way," to the delight of all, including the film's
stars, Salma Hayek, Ryan Philippe and Mike Myers, who plays
the late Steve Rubell, one of Studio 54's legendary owners.
New York critics lambasted the film, however, with the New
York Times calling the effort "a confused mishmash."
-=> * <=-
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Air Force said Thursday it will fly Keiko,
the celebrated killer whale star of the movie "Free Willy," from
Oregon to Iceland Sept. 9 in a major first step toward returning him
to the open ocean. The 10,000-pound whale will be placed in a custom
traveling tank aboard a C-17 military cargo plane and flown non-stop
from Newport, Ore., to the Westman Islands where a specially-built
floating pen is waiting for him. The expected cost of the flight,
nearly $300,000, will be borne by the private Free Willy Keiko
Foundation based in Newport. The foundation will spend about $2
million to establish Keiko in his new Iceland home.
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:45:33 +0100
From: kittymach@juno.com (Kitty Mach)
Subject: Re: [MV] Ever After
I give it 10+!
Sad, sad movie. Drew Barrymore did good. Danielle was her characters
name.
You should see it!
Kitty
"When I panick, I make this face."[expression doesn't change]Mulder in
The X-Files Movie
"Someone wasn't worthy..."Spike in BtVS
"No, I'm not one of them, I'm something else."Blade inBlade
"I want the car. Chicks dig the car."Robin in Batman & Robin
*Chris O'Donnell~Mike Damus~James Marsters
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:41:38 +0100
From: "Toni Slovacek" <tonis@dircon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [MV] Aliens II vs III
Well there was no problem with killing the alien in Alien actually, it's
just that due to their circumstances (being in space) they would have died
too. Aliens gave Ripley a chance to kick butt instead of having to creep
around utterly terrified the whole time; it worked as a tremendous anti-dote
to the gut-clenching terror of the first one. And the problem with spilling
alien blood on a spaceship was nicely reprised with the discovery of the
queen on the Sulacco (whom we then saw happily blown out of the airlock!).
My personal opinion is that Alien was brilliant as a thriller - all tension
and every idea blocked by a practical obstruction; Aliens was brilliant as
an action/adventure where they seemed to start off with good odds, but were
gradually reduced until the odds were terrible again, and Ripley could earn
her paycheque; Alien 3 - no comment, suck, suck, suck; Alien: Resurrection -
given that they kept the storyline as it had been mutated by twatface, I
applauded and enjoyed this film because it gave us a new and delightfully
ambiguous look at Ripley, refocused attention on a universal problem (the
aliens returning to Earth) and at the same time managed to show new facets
of the aliens, the inspace environment and genetic mangling.
As a member of the public, not a film connoisseur or student, I don't
particularly care whether a shot is artistic or not; my main criteria
revolves around the story, the characters and to a lesser extent the
presentation - if the director is a visionary and wields the spfx wand
gracefully, I consider a major bonus; if they only use spfx then they've
failed. Ridley Scott has been the most original 'visionary' director I've
ever watched - and it tends to be against him that I judge all others!
Enough ranting and raving ...
- -----Original Message-----
From: greuel <greuel@eifel-net.net>
To: movies@lists.xmission.com <movies@lists.xmission.com>
Date: 28 August 1998 16:49
Subject: [MV] Aliens II vs III
> I agree with bruce...I mean, guys, really, alien3 (alien resurrection
> as well for that matter) really really stinked. Alien was pretty good
> and I just loved Aliens...
I'm surprised at all the raving about the 2nd Alien. I did not like it at
all. The idea about the first one was that there is a creature of utter
beauty. The beauty of perfection. The original alien is so highly
developed that only Ripley's wit can overcome it. In the 2nd they are
degraded to canon fodder. There are hundreds of aliens against about
20 marines - and the only reason why the aliens can get their foot in
the door is because these marines are so dumb and stupid in their
macho behaviour, that they are wasy meat. The acid blood and the
intelligence of the Resurrection play no role whatsoever. And
Cameron started that "Mother" thing. While the idea is quite good -
mother alien vs. mother Ripley, he had to create a yet bigger alien.
Simply because the originals were no threat anymore. There is no
perfection in the 2nd alien. They can be killed by various means and
from every distance. The ultimate stand off by the two mothers are
ridiculous. Ripley with robot can beat mother alien? Doesn't really
sound convincing.
Plus, while Scott's Alien had stunning visuals and Fincher at least
attempted them, I didn't find any of that in Cameron. Sure, he is great
on FX, but working with the camera or lighting is not his speciality
and that prevents him from making visually exciting films to a large
degree. <-- Look! It's a period!
thomas
- ---
http://greuel.notrix.de/ - abomiNation
"One must still have chaos in one
to give birth to a dancing star"
Friedrich Nietzsche
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:41:04 +0100
From: kittymach@juno.com (Kitty Mach)
Subject: Re: [MV] 54
His name is Ryan Phillippe he has been in
White Squall
I Know What You Did Last Summer
Nowhere
Little Boy Blue
Homegrown
54
Cruel Inventions
Dancing About Architect
and some others I forgot.
My sister told me about these. She knows alot about him.
Kitty
"When I panick, I make this face."[expression doesn't change]Mulder in
The X-Files Movie
"Someone wasn't worthy..."Spike in BtVS
"No, I'm not one of them, I'm something else."Blade inBlade
"I want the car. Chicks dig the car."Robin in Batman & Robin
*Chris O'Donnell~Mike Damus~James Marsters
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:46:26 +0100
From: kittymach@juno.com (Kitty Mach)
Subject: [MV] Blade
comments on the movie?
I haven't seen it, but I want to hear others opinion...
Kitty
"When I panick, I make this face."[expression doesn't change]Mulder in
The X-Files Movie
"Someone wasn't worthy..."Spike in BtVS
"No, I'm not one of them, I'm something else."Blade inBlade
"I want the car. Chicks dig the car."Robin in Batman & Robin
*Chris O'Donnell~Mike Damus~James Marsters
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 11:42:52 -0700
From: Michael Dequina <michael_jordan@geocities.com>
Subject: [MV] The Movie Report#156, 8/28/98
T H E
M O V I E
R E P O R T
#156
AUGUST 28, 1998
=>T H I S W E E K<=
M O V I E S
- -_54_
- -_Blade_
- -_Let's_Talk_About_Sex_
- -_Why_Do_Fools_Fall_in_Love_
- -_Without_Limits_
- -_Wrongfully_Accused_
V I D E O
- -_Men_with_Guns_
- -_Pocahontas_II:_Journey_to_a_New_World_
- -_The_Real_Blonde_
- -_Woo_
PLEASE HELP...
...keep the MR and Mr. Brown's Movie Site alive
(_I_don't_even_own_a_computer_) by renting or purchasing videos from
Reel.com! Visit:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nhp-reel.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=welcome.html
Now is your _last_chance_ to pre-order _Titanic_ for only $9.99! Order at:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nhp-reel.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=/sale/sale.html
For links to the official websites of all the current films, past reviews,
exclusive Hollywood event photos, movie discussion board, movie theme MIDI
files, and more, visit Mr. Brown's Movie Site at:
http://welcome.to/mrbrown or
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown
Please don't forget to sign the guestbook...
Select reviews are available at CompuServe Hollywood Hotline:
http://www.HollywoodHotline.com
...and the Eyepiece Network at:
http://www.eyepiece.com
...and Albany Online at:
http://www.AlbanyOnline.com
all movies graded out of four stars (****)
~~~
=>M O V I E S<=
N E W R E L E A S E S
_54_ (R) * 1/2
If there were a subject just screaming to be made into a film, it was
Studio 54, the late Steve Rubell's infamous New York discotheque, which
came to symbolize the taboo-smashing excesses of the disco era's heyday:
easy drugs and even easier sex between everyone, all set to a thumping
dance beat. So when Miramax started production on _54_ last year, the buzz
of hype and resulting anticipation began: an edgy film as down-and-dirty as
the club itself, written and directed by a promising first-timer (Mark
Christopher) and starring some hot young talent (Salma Hayek, Neve
Campbell, newcomer Ryan Phillippe, and Mike Myers in his dramatic debut).
My, how easily does the worm turn. Hype turned into damage control when
word got out about 11th-hour reshoots (wrapped only a month ago), a rash of
studio-imposed edits that left virtually the entire cast and crew
(especially Christopher) unhappy, and the very likely possibility that
Miramax would not screen the finished film for critics. At the last
minute, though, Miramax did decide to screen the film (so hastily scheduled
was the screening that Myers's last name was misspelled on the invitation,
not to mention the numerous typos in the press notes) for a media audience
that came away noticeably less than impressed, myself included. And with
good reason--somehow, some way, the supremely disappointing _54_ has made
the historically hip haven of hedonism... boring.
Although Christopher has distanced himself from the finished film, he
still must shoulder some of the blame for _54_'s lifelessness. _54_
focuses, for the most part, on a tight-knit trio of employees at the club:
coat check girl/aspiring disco diva Anita (a wasted Hayek); her busboy
husband, Greg (Breckin Meyer); and, most prominently, the fresh-from-Jersey
Shane O'Shea (Phillippe), who enjoys a quick rise from busboy to head
bartender. These characters are about as generic as those descriptions.
In focusing on the hired help, Christopher really missed the boat. With
the exception of the flamboyant, always-woozy Rubell (Myers, in a
well-modulated turn), the meaty stories to be told at Studio 54 are not the
workers' but those of the people who went there to party; not necessarily
the numerous VIP guests, but the wild eccentrics who managed to be picked
from the crowd by the club's famously hard-ass doormen and dance (among
other things) the night away with the rich, famous, and infamous (the only
taste of the crowd comes by way of Ellen Dow's feisty Dottie, a disco- and
drug-crazed granny, but she's a peripheral character at best). As such,
aside from the expected overhead crowd shots, there is precious little
actual _dancing_ in _54_. What is a disco film--especially one about the
pinnacle of the movement--without the dancing? Even Whit Stillman's
_The_Last_Days_of_Disco_, which wasn't so much concerned with disco as it
was witty dialogue within a group of hip-to-only-themselves club-hopping
preppies, featured at least one extended dance scene.
Dancing isn't the only thing glazed over in _54_--so is the sex, but that
may not be entirely Christopher's fault. From what I've heard, his
original vision was something considerably more dark and daring, starting
with the Shane character: he was conceived (and actually filmed) as a wild,
morally ambiguous bisexual, which would have made an efficient springboard
to cover the pansexual pleasure palace aspect of Studio 54's legend. But
somewhere between principal photography and the final cut, Shane was
defanged and quite literally straightened out; consequently, so was the
film. Aside from a brief glimpse of erotic encounters toward the beginning
of the film, Shane's fleeting dalliance with seductive socialite Billie
(Sela Ward), and an abbreviated bedhopping montage, the sexual dimension is
just about ignored. Shane, in this incarnation, is sanitized to the point
of blandness, an idealistic do-gooder who pines for a frequent guest at the
club, Julie Black (Campbell), a worldly soap star with, yes, a heart of
gold. This tacked-on "romance" would have been slightly less tedious if
either Campbell or Phillippe made some connection with each other or the
audience. They fail on both counts.
Ultimately, _54_'s failure comes down to three letters: F-U-N. As in,
there isn't any to be had for the audience. Too much time is spent with
the boring Shane, and too little is spent on the club floor, where all the
action took place. Anyhow, though, whatever time is spent on the 54 floor
is not used very effectively. When Anita finally gets her big break and
perform onstage at the club, it should be a euphoric height, for her, the
crowd, and the audience; however, the moment doesn't get a chance to reach
that level, for it is cut short by a moment of forced sentimentality, which
also mars the film's conclusion (one of the last-minute reshoots).
Strangely upbeat and wistful, the resolution is wholly unconvincing and
unsatisfying.
There is an interesting portrait of Studio 54 out there--two of them, in
fact--but _54_ is not one of them. They're on cable TV: a couple of
documentaries produced by E! and VH1. These two fascinating looks at the
club and all the sordid goings-on within it show that there's still a great
disco movie to be made. The problem is, after the critical and certain box
office failure of _54_, the subject may have run its Hollywood course.
IN BRIEF
_Blade_ (R) ***
After years of attempts (_Howard_the_Duck_, anyone? _The_Punisher_?), the
once-mighty, now-beleaguered Marvel Comics has a potential film franchise
in, ironically, one of their most obscure and ridiculed heroes: Blade
(Wesley Snipes), a human/vampire hybrid who hunts down the undead to avenge
his dead mother, who was attacked by a vampire when she was pregnant, thus
making Blade into what he is. There is one long slow patch, and Stephen
Dorff's unmenacing villain is clearly no match for the intense Snipes, but
the inventive production design, energized action sequences (featuring
martial arts choreography by Snipes himself), and stylish direction by
Stephen Norrington make this ideal summer fare: quite enjoyable, and
equally disposable.
_Let's_Talk_About_Sex_ (R) no stars
Let's not. Troy Beyer's directorial debut (she also wrote and stars)
offers plenty of the bawdy talk the title promises. But it's wrapped
around a load of dreck. Advice columnist Jazz (Beyer) aspires to be a talk
show hostess, and the candid woman-to-woman interviews she shoots for an
audition tape send Jazz and her two roommates, Lena (Randi Ingerman) and
Michelle (Paget Brewster), on that dreaded "journey of self-discovery"
traveled in too many independent films. Jazz unlocks a secret trauma that
keeps her from committing to her perfect man (Joseph C. Phillips); slutty
Lena realizes she just wants to be loved; bitchy Michelle realizes that her
coldness comes from fear.
And the audience, what does it discover about these characters? They're a
bunch of crybabies. Make that just "babies," because the duct-challenged
Beyer, Ingerman, and Brewster cannot muster a single tear between them,
which is a glaring problem once the film settles into its almost laughably
dissonant tone: raunchy interview segments alternating with soppy,
melodramatic crying scenes that sent my eyes rolling. The film's
hilariously overblown housework-as-grieving climax, complete with cleanser
cans being thrown in frustration, has to be a cinema landmark of some sort.
As for the film's purported insight into female sexuality (most of the
interviews are done with real people, not actors), to me it seems that
Beyer simply chose the most outrageous segments for inclusion in the film,
rather than the most honest. Terrible writing, terrible acting, terrible
direction--terrible film. (opens September 11)
_Why_Do_Fools_Fall_in_Love_ (R) ***
As the summer popcorn season winds down, and the weightier fall/holiday
season begins, here arrives a smoothly executed "transition" film, which
tackles some fairly serious subject matter in a fun, entertaining,
guilt-free package. _Why_Do_Fools..._ centers on the court battle between
the late doo wop singer Frankie Lymon's (Larenz Tate) three
wives--glamorous singer Zola Taylor (Halle Berry), petty thief Elizabeth
Waters (Vivica A. Fox), and demure schoolmarm Emira Eagle (Lela Rochon)--
for his estimated $4 million estate . Testimony-stemmed flashbacks
chronicle Lymon's quick rise to fame as the lead singer of the Teenagers
(famous for the classic title song), his equally quick fall into obscurity
and drugs, and the circumstances behind his untimely death.
Director Gregory Nava's recreation of Lymon's late '50s-early '60s
performances are exuberant, buoyed by Tate's charismatic performance,
which, in turn, provides a sympathetic anchor when things turn dark. The
lighter court storyline is a bit more cliched and stereotyped, with all the
verbal catfights between the women, but the appealing trio of Berry,
Rochon, and especially Fox (in the showiest role of the three) make the
proceedings enjoyable. These two contrasting sides, Lymon's tragically
short existence and the battle between the three widows, are meshed
together with ease into a pleasing cinematic confection by Nava, a proven
hand musical biographies (_Selena_).
_Without_Limits_ (PG-13) ***
The second of the two Steve Prefontaine biopics sat on the Warner Bros.
shelf for a year to distance itself from last year's shallow
Disney-produced "mockumentary," _Prefontaine_, but the WB execs needn't
have bothered--their film, co-written (with Kenny Moore) and directed by
Robert Towne, clearly wins the race. Compared to the other film, which
portrayed the '70s track star as simply arrogant, _Without_Limits_ paints a
much more sympathetic picture of the charismatically cocky Prefontaine
(here played by Billy Crudup), making his tragic story (a disappointment at
the '72 Olympics, an attempt at a '76 comeback cut short by a fatal car
accident) much more involving. Still, Towne makes a couple of missteps: a
recurring image of a young Pre trying to outrun other boys makes for some
lame symbolism, and the ending doesn't pack the tearjerking wallop it
needs. Compensating, though, are a couple of sterling lead performances by
Crudup, who can run circles actingwise around _Prefontaine_'s pallid lead
Jared Leto; and Donald Sutherland, who plays Pre's mentor, University of
Oregon track coach (and future Nike founder) Bill Bowerman. (opens
September 11)
_Wrongfully_Accused_ (PG-13) 1/2*
If _Jane_Austen's_Mafia!_ and _BASEketball_ were the final nails in the
coffin of the Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker joke-a-second brand of cinematic
comedy, then this largely laughless _Fugitive_ spoof, written and directed
by ZAZ's frequent silent "P," Pat Proft, is the hydraulic lift (make that
"drop") that sends the coffin six feet under _and_ the dirt that's piled on
top. An understandably tired-looking Leslie Nielsen, who should seriously
consider retirement from this tired genre, is the Harrison Ford stand-in
wrongfully accused (we have a title!) of murder; Richard Crenna falls flat
on his face trying to replicate Tommy Lee Jones's quick-tongued quips as
the federal marshal on Nielsen's trail. There are a few amusing sight
gags, but fans of ZAZ know that the team's best efforts also featured
absurdly funny, deadpan verbal jokes (one of my all-time favorites, from
_Hot_Shots!_Part_Deux_: Topper: "I want to meet your parents and pet your
dog." Ramada: "My parents are dead, Topper; my dog ate them."). All of
the wisecracks here land with a thud. Jerry Zucker broke from the ZAZ
formula back in 1990 with _Ghost_ and never looked back; it's time for his
former cohorts--brother David, Jim Abrahams, and Proft--to move on as well.
IN CURRENT RELEASE
(full reviews of the following in past MRs and at the listed URLs)
- -_Armageddon_ (PG-13) *** <MR#149, 7/1/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#armageddon
- -_The_Avengers_ (PG-13) no stars <MR#155, 8/20/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#avengers
- -_Billy's_Hollywood_Screen_Kiss_ (R) *** <MR#148, 6/26/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#billy
- -_Dance_with_Me_ (PG) ** <MR#154, 8/13/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#dance
- -_Dead_Man_on_Campus_ (R) * <MR#155, 8/20/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#deadman
- -_Doctor_Dolittle_ (PG-13) ** <MR#148, 6/16/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#dolittle
- -_Ever_After_ (PG-13) *** <MR#152, 7/30/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#everafter
- -_Halloween:_H20--20_Years_Later_ (R) *** <MR#152, 7/30/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#h20
- -_How_Stella_Got_Her_Groove_Back_ (R) *** <MR#155, 8/20/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#stella
- -_Lethal_Weapon_4_ (R) *** 1/2 <MR#150, 7/10/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#lethal4
- -_The_Mask_of_Zorro_ (PG-13) *** <MR#150, 7/10/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#zorro
- -_Mulan_ (G) **** <MR#147, 6/17/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt35.html#mulan
- -_The_Negotiator_ (R) *** <MR#151, 7/24/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#negotiator
- -_The_Opposite_of_Sex_ (R) *** 1/2 <MR#144, 5/29/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt34.html#sex
- -_Return_to_Paradise_ (R) *** <MR#154, 8/13/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#paradise
- -_Saving_Private_Ryan_ (R) **** <MR#151, 7/24/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#ryan
- -_Slums_of_Beverly_Hills_ (R) ** 1/2 <MR#155, 8/20/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#slums
- -_There's_Something_About_Mary_ (R) *** 1/2 <MR#150, 7/10/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt36.html#mary
- -_Your_Friends_&_Neighbors_ (R) *** 1/2 <MR#154, 8/13/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt38.html#friends
FUTURE FILMS
- -_Lolita_ (R) ** 1/2 <MR#151, 7/24/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#lolita
(September 25)
- -_Pecker_ (R) ** 1/2 <MR#153, 8/7/98>
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt37.html#pecker
(September 25)
O N T H E H O R I Z O N
FRIDAY
_54_ (R) * 1/2 <see above review>
Mark Christopher's eagerly awaited, utterly lifeless film set in the
infamous New York disco. Ryan Phillippe, Salma Hayek, Neve Campbell, and
Mike Myers star.
_Why_Do_Fools_Fall_in_Love_ (R) *** <see above review>
Slight but fun fact-based film about three women (Halle Berry, Vivica A.
Fox, and Lela Rochon) vying for the estate of late singer Frankie Lymon
(Larenz Tate).
~~~
=>V I D E O<=
N E W T H I S W E E K
_Men_with_Guns_ (R) ***
Full review in MR#133, 3/5/98; and at:
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt30.html#hombres
Rent or buy at Reel.com:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nph-session.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=moviepage.as
p?MMID=40962
John Sayles's engrossing, if distant, largely Spanish-language drama about
a doctor (Federico Luppi) in Latin America who tries to track down the
missing students he sent to provide medical care to small villages.
(Columbia TriStar Home Video)
_Pocahontas_II:_Journey_to_a_New_World_ ** 1/2
Rent or buy at Reel.com:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nph-session.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=moviepage.as
p?MMID=42605
Disney's oft-maligned, incredibly underrated 1995 romantic drama would
seem like an odd candidate for one of the Mouse's quickie direct-to-video
sequels. However, it is, in fact, the one animated feature that truly
lends itself to one since there is more to the Native American heroine's
real life story than what was covered in the first film.
_Journey_to_a_New_World_ takes place an unspecified amount of time after
the end of the original film, with Pocahontas (once again spoken by Irene
Bedard and sung by Judy Kuhn), still lamenting the loss of love John Smith,
travelling to England with diplomat John Rolfe (Billy Zane) in an effort to
negotiate a lasting peace between her people and English settlers. Upon
arrival in London, Poca and Rolfe grow close and develop a fondness for
each other--which is put to the test with the reappearance of Smith (Donal
Gibson, sitting in for--and sounding remarkably like--his brother Mel).
While _Journey_to_a_New_World_ is the best of the crop of Disney's
direct-to-video animation sequels (which also includes two
awful-to-mediocre _Aladdin_ sequels and an insulting _Beauty_and_the_Beast_
"midquel" that is true blasphemy), it's still a slapdash effort, with none
of gorgeous colors and animation of the first film, and little of its
emotional resonance. Smith is regressed to the cocky swashbuckler he was
at the beginning of the first film, making Poca's ultimate choice between
him and Rolfe, which should have been a dramatically conflicted one, rather
obvious and easy. Predictably, the new songs are a pale shadow of the Alan
Menken-Stephen Schwartz feature score, but there is one memorable tune:
Poca's introspective "Where Do I Go From Here?" which serves as the movie's
signature theme. (Walt Disney Home Video)
_The_Real_Blonde_ (R) 1/2*
Full review in MR#131, 2/19/98; and at:
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt29.html#blonde
Rent or buy at Reel.com:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nph-session.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=moviepage.as
p?MMID=40951
Atrocious mess of a comedy focusing on the romantic and professional
struggles of two New York actors (Matthew Modine and Maxwell Caulfield).
Catherine Keener, Bridgette Wilson, Daryl Hannah, Denis Leary, and
Elizabeth Berkley also star. (Paramount Home Video)
_Woo_ (R) **
Full review in MR#141, 5/7/98; and at:
http://www.godamongdirectors.com/mrbrown/movierpt33.html#woo
Rent or buy at Reel.com:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nph-session.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=moviepage.as
p?MMID=41268
A nice rapport between stars Jada Pinkett Smith and Tommy Davidson is
largely squandered in this uneven, clumsy romantic comedy between the
titular party girl (Pinkett Smith) and a square paralegal (Davidson). (New
Line Home Video)
A L S O N E W T H I S W E E K
_The_Leading_Man_ (R)
Rent or buy at Reel.com:
http://www.reel.com/cgi-bin/nph-session.exe?COBRAND=MRBR&OBJECT=moviepage.as
p?MMID=12460
A playwright (Lambert Wilson) hires a movie star (Jon Bon Jovi) to
seduce his wife (Anna Galiena) in John Duigan's comic thriller. (BMG
Independents)
~~~
=>N E X T W E E K<=
Back on schedule, with more reviews, including:
- -_Rounders_
- -_Simon_Birch_
'til then...
__________________________________________________________
Michael Dequina
Chat Forum Host, The Official Michael Jordan Web Site
http://jordan.sportsline.com
mj23@michaeljordanfan.com
michael_jordan@geocities.com | mrbrown@ucla.edu
>My personal WWW sites<
Mr. Brown's Movie Site: http://welcome.to/mrbrown
Michael Jordan Beyond the Court: http://fly.to/michaeljordan
A Michael Jordan Fan's Heartbreak: http://fly.to/mj23
Personal Page: http://welcome.to/w3md
>Other WWW sites I work on<
CompuServe Hollywood Hotline: http://www.HollywoodHotline.com
Albany Online: http://www.AlbanyOnline.com
Eyepiece Network: http://www.eyepiece.com
"Oliver Stone doesn't know shit about basketball."
- --Michael Jordan, on why he refused to work with the
director on a hoops-themed Nike commercial
__________________________________________________________
[ To leave the movies mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe ]
[ movies (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]
------------------------------
End of movies-digest V2 #78
***************************
[ To quit the movies-digest mailing list (big mistake), send the message ]
[ "unsubscribe movies-digest" (without the quotes) to majordomo@xmission.com ]