home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
pub
/
lists
/
mobility
/
archive
/
v03.n079
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2000-01-17
|
21KB
From: owner-mobility-digest@lists.xmission.com (mobility-digest)
To: mobility-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: mobility-digest V3 #79
Reply-To: mobility
Sender: owner-mobility-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-mobility-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
mobility-digest Tuesday, January 18 2000 Volume 03 : Number 079
Re: (mobility) essays vs. no essays (was: moby)
Re: (mobility) essays vs. no essays (was: moby)
Re: (mobility) bt/in trouble with mobys managemtn
(mobility) The Moby Essays
Re: (mobility) Thanks 2
(mobility) Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)
Re: (mobility) Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)
Re: (mobility) shhh!
Re: (mobility) shhh!
(mobility) Links a la Ricci
Re: (mobility) moby pic & WDMHFSB? video
Re: (mobility) re: those frightening wig pictures
Re: (mobility) re: those frightening wig pictures
(mobility) Mobility Mixes Moby
Re: (mobility) Natural Blues on V2?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 04:22:22 GMT
From: "pat f" <stupendsmn@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: (mobility) essays vs. no essays (was: moby)
>From: "Steve Giles" <power_hymn@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: mobility@lists.xmission.com
>To: mobility@lists.xmission.com
>Subject: (mobility) essays vs. no essays (was: moby)
>Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:42:15 PST
>
>
>You're complaining about Moby's method of delivery when sharing his
>views.... but is it Moby's message itself that bothers you?
>
>Because, as a longtime fan of Moby, I've found that Moby does not shove his
>views on people. His views are not plastered all over his music, videos,
>interviews, and conerts. In fact, he hides them in his liner notes so that
>those who WANT to know his stance may find them there. I eat meat, I
>smoke,
>I drink, etc., and I've never felt like Moby was trying to make me change
>my
>behavior. If he were pushy and preachy, I wouldn't be here. The way I see
>it, Moby shares ideas. He doesn't shove them.
>
>Why are you a vegetarian?
>
>You take moral offense to Moby speaking his mind. Why?
>
>What preachy attitude?
>
>Would you rather he just shut up and played music?
>
>I'd say it's you that needs to step down from the soapbox.
>
>-Steve
>
i am a vegetarian because i fell in love with one and it helped me to deal
with the distance between us
i dont take offense to his speaking his mind just the way he does it, i find
him to be pushy and maybe you dont, but i as well as many others find this
true
i love his music, but i saw him at CREAM, which is a huge rave in montreal,
i dont really know how to describe it, but i have heard it described as him
acting like he is a christ figure, sacrificing himself for us- i wouldnt go
that far, but i think he thinks he is better than a lot of other people
becuase of what he practices and preaches.
i think people should stand for something, i stand for nudity and lots of
sex, but i dont run around with manifestos about it hidden in my cds. so i
am not saying he should shut up, but i think he preaches in the wrong
way-and i dont like it
ok thats it
pat (stepping down from his soapbox)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:19:06 +1000
From: Jane Browning <e.browning@qut.edu.au>
Subject: Re: (mobility) essays vs. no essays (was: moby)
At 04:22 17/01/00 +0000, you wrote:
>i love his music, but i saw him at CREAM, which is a huge rave in montreal,
>i dont really know how to describe it, but i have heard it described as him
>acting like he is a christ figure, sacrificing himself for us- i wouldnt go
>that far, but i think he thinks he is better than a lot of other people
>becuase of what he practices and preaches.
If you're talking about when he holds his hands out horizontally and
remains motionless, I interpreted that differently. I thought that stance
was very striking and powerful in a theatrical sense. That stance exposes
the chakras (I hope I have the right term). And if you wish to interpret
his symbolism as religious then I wouldn't interpret it as him elevating
himself to a Christ like figure at all. If the image reminds you of the
sacrifice of Christ then that might be his intention (agreed it's not too
subliminal!) but it also could be the recognition of the "christ" or the
potential for the characteristics of christ within every human. I am not a
Christian but I was quite struck with the aesthetics!
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:08:06 EST
From: Insrtbrain@aol.com
Subject: Re: (mobility) bt/in trouble with mobys managemtn
In a message dated 1/16/00 2:52:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, zbentz@d.umn.edu
writes:
<< bt thanks moby in the liner notes, so maybe we'll see something in the
future?
>>
Yeah I mentioned that when I first got the UK album because I wanted to know
what the connection was with them... beyond both being absolutely life
changing musicians..
\
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:10:38 PST
From: "Stephanie Momose" <srmomo@hotmail.com>
Subject: (mobility) The Moby Essays
Oh all ye who think Moby is preachy...
You somehow consciously or subconsciously believe that Moby the artist has
crossed a line of standards - perhaps violated a more.
Why is this?
You have the choice in reading his essays and liner notes. He is an artist
- - not a machine. If he were a machine, his music would have no emotion - no
life. But Moby is an artist, a complex human with beliefs and standards of
his own. You may love his music, but you cannot fully appreciate the music
until you understand the man behind the music. To understand Moby is to
have a new sense of songs such as "Run On."
Moby wears no mask. I applaud his well written essays. While I don't
always agree/disagree with his point of view, it is certainly nice to see an
artist doing more than fashioning a new groundbreaking album in the music
world.
I believe in open mindedness - therefore I have no problem with these
essays. Those who criticize Moby and feel he is forcing an agenda... check
your level of open mindedness. If he is somehow crossing a boundary,
perhaps you need to redraw that line - it may be too close around you.
Miss Steph
PS - Moby has to eat too. And I'm sure he has his favorite restaurants.
However, it is our responsibility to keep him at earth's level in our own
minds. He's no better than you or I, striving for altruism.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:39:06 PST
From: "Daniel Lee" <danlee27@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: (mobility) Thanks 2
Personally, i have lost all hope of this project ever getting done. i too
sent a remix to GREG SHIPLEY, who seems to spontaneously vanish for months
at a time, then reappear briefly to get mad at people for flooding him with
Thanks 2 messages before promptly vanishing once again.
Anyway, if Thanks 2 is NOT going to get done, Greg, can I please get my
remix back?
Dan Lee
>From: Johan Jaatinen <agape@gargamel.com>
>Reply-To: mobility@lists.xmission.com
>To: mobility@lists.xmission.com
>Subject: (mobility) Thanks 2
>Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 13:35:01 +0100
>
>Hi everyone!
>
>(I'm sorry if I'm bringing up a subject that's just been discussed. But I'm
>new to the list.)
>
>When I was on this list for about a year ago, there was some talk about
>THANKS 2 being produced (a CD containing covers and remixes of Moby songs,
>made by people on this list - a continuation from THANKS 1). I myself made
>a contribution and sent on a CDR to the person who was going to put the
>whole thing together. Then I don't know what happened. Does anybody know?
>If the project was ever finished, I'd like to know how I can get hold of a
>copy...
>
>Cheers!
>Johan.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Johan Jaatinen agape@gargamel.com
>G÷teborg, Sweden johan.jaatinen@mp.se
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:16:11 +0100
From: "Bart van Eijck" <eijck@IAE.nl>
Subject: (mobility) Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)
Got this in the mail today:
===================
REMIXES & UNRELEASED (73:41) [1999]
RUS CD, V2, 63881-27599-2
1 4:43 Run On (Plastic Angel Mix)
2 6:41 Honey (Sharam Jey's Sweet Honey Mix)
3 6:00 Run On (Sharam Jey's Always On The Run Remix)
4 6:26 Bodyrock (Olav Basoski's Da Hot Funk Da Freak Funk Remix)
5 6:48 Sunspot (Previously Unreleased)
6 5:30 Bodyrock (Rae & Christian Remix)
7 5:03 Sunday (Previously Unreleased)
8 4:44 Bodyrock (B & H's Bodyrob Mix)
9 6:26 Honey (Aphrodite & Mickey Finn Mix)
10 6:03 Run On (Moby's Young & Funky Mix)
11 6:42 Memory Gospel (Previously Unreleased)
12 8:15 Bodyrock (Dani K÷nig Remix)
========================================
But no way that this could be an official release! First there's the
artwork,
It has a rather kinky picture on the front with Moby in high boots wearing
only some "fish net" panty-hose, sunglasses and a dog belt with spikes
of which the rope is being held tight by a beautiful scarcely dressed
high-heeled blond woman. Quite an SM scene here... On the back of the
booklet we find the Bodyrock skull image (blue background). Underneath
the transparent tray is the EIW Moby underwater bubble image (one of the
two pictures in the center of the EIW booklet) The backprint is made up
of (on the left half) the skull image and (on the right) a Moby photograph
(again from the Bodyrock single!) on a red background with the track titles.
Also, the back insert doesn't quite fit the box...
Then there's the CD itself... It has the same color as the Bodyrock CD
single
(greenish) and even the SAME catalog# as the Bodyrock single, ha ha
I have seen these kind of bootlegs before with "the best of" Metallica,
Guns 'n' Roses, Kelly Family etc. But never with dance music. For the
record companies not a nice, but still a sign that an artist is getting
pretty popular!
In the discography I have listed this one with all the other official
releases
since it's done quite professional (no cdr) and I was wondering if there
were any objections from you guys. Let me know at eijck@iae.nl
(<>,,<>)
http://www.geocities.com/animal_sight/
np: Moby - Run On (Moby's Young & Funky Mix)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:12:10 -0500
From: Scott.Kanov@v2music.com
Subject: Re: (mobility) Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)
- --0__=EzHmFIO9dQNDRTIQwi6No08lqTh9TSOcaVl39Yn2e1cQskAuNmDqvIMD
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Shhh. someone from V2 will hear you.
"Bart van Eijck" <eijck@IAE.nl> on 01/17/2000 02:16:11 PM
Please respond to mobility@lists.xmission.com
To: "mailing list mobility" <mobility@lists.xmission.com>
cc: (bcc: Scott Kanov/New_York/V2 Music)
Subject: (mobility) Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)
- --0__=EzHmFIO9dQNDRTIQwi6No08lqTh9TSOcaVl39Yn2e1cQskAuNmDqvIMD
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Got this in the mail today:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
REMIXES & UNRELEASED (73:41) [1999]
RUS CD, V2, 63881-27599-2
1 4:43 Run On (Plastic Angel Mix)
2 6:41 Honey (Sharam Jey's Sweet Honey Mix)
3 6:00 Run On (Sharam Jey's Always On The Run Remix)
4 6:26 Bodyrock (Olav Basoski's Da Hot Funk Da Freak Funk Remix)
5 6:48 Sunspot (Previously Unreleased)
6 5:30 Bodyrock (Rae & Christian Remix)
7 5:03 Sunday (Previously Unreleased)
8 4:44 Bodyrock (B & H's Bodyrob Mix)
9 6:26 Honey (Aphrodite & Mickey Finn Mix)
10 6:03 Run On (Moby's Young & Funky Mix)
11 6:42 Memory Gospel (Previously Unreleased)
12 8:15 Bodyrock (Dani K=F6nig Remix)
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
But no way that this could be an official release! First there's the
artwork,
It has a rather kinky picture on the front with Moby in high boots wear=
ing
only some "fish net" panty-hose, sunglasses and a dog belt with spikes
of which the rope is being held tight by a beautiful scarcely dressed
high-heeled blond woman. Quite an SM scene here... On the back of the
booklet we find the Bodyrock skull image (blue background). Underneath=
the transparent tray is the EIW Moby underwater bubble image (one of th=
e
two pictures in the center of the EIW booklet) The backprint is made =
up
of (on the left half) the skull image and (on the right) a Moby photogr=
aph
(again from the Bodyrock single!) on a red background with the track ti=
tles.
Also, the back insert doesn't quite fit the box...
Then there's the CD itself... It has the same color as the Bodyrock CD
single
(greenish) and even the SAME catalog# as the Bodyrock single, ha ha
I have seen these kind of bootlegs before with "the best of" Metallica,=
Guns 'n' Roses, Kelly Family etc. But never with dance music. For the
record companies not a nice, but still a sign that an artist is getting=
pretty popular!
In the discography I have listed this one with all the other official
releases
since it's done quite professional (no cdr) and I was wondering if ther=
e
were any objections from you guys. Let me know at eijck@iae.nl
(<>,,<>)
http://www.geocities.com/animal_sight/
np: Moby - Run On (Moby's Young & Funky Mix)
=
- --0__=EzHmFIO9dQNDRTIQwi6No08lqTh9TSOcaVl39Yn2e1cQskAuNmDqvIMD--
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:32:40 +0100
From: "Bart van Eijck" <eijck@IAE.nl>
Subject: Re: (mobility) shhh!
Scott.Kanov@v2music.com wrote:
>Shhh. someone from V2 will hear you.
Hmm, I see from your e-mail address you're from V2...
At first I really thought it was an official release... I didn't mean to...
please don't hurt me!
By the way, pretty sick minds who read a message with
"Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)" as the subject! :)
(<>,,<>)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:44:37 -0500
From: Scott.Kanov@v2music.com
Subject: Re: (mobility) shhh!
No worries, I'm not the Record Police....altho' there is one. New laws in China
about bootlegged CD's. Plenty of jail-time, and I hear they give Turkish prisons
a run for their money.
Enjoy your CD, those mixes are brilliant.
Pax,
Scott
"Bart van Eijck" <eijck@IAE.nl> on 01/17/2000 02:32:40 PM
Please respond to mobility@lists.xmission.com
To: mobility@lists.xmission.com
cc: (bcc: Scott Kanov/New_York/V2 Music)
Subject: Re: (mobility) shhh!
Scott.Kanov@v2music.com wrote:
>Shhh. someone from V2 will hear you.
Hmm, I see from your e-mail address you're from V2...
At first I really thought it was an official release... I didn't mean to...
please don't hurt me!
By the way, pretty sick minds who read a message with
"Moby goes doggy style (ooh la la!)" as the subject! :)
(<>,,<>)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:04:53 PST
From: "Steve Giles" <power_hymn@hotmail.com>
Subject: (mobility) Links a la Ricci
The links directory at moby.org has been refreshed!
http://www.moby.org/links
From the DEF Moby news service, January 12th:
'Natural Blues' will be released across Europe on March 6. There are two new
B-side tracks - "The Whispering Wind" and "Sick In The System" - and remixes
from Perfecto and Mike D (Beastie Boys).
The video for Natural Blues has been directed by acclaimed photographer
David LaChapelle and features actresses Christina Ricci and Fairuza Balk.
'Why Does My Heart Feel So Bad' reached number 16 in the UK charts last
month. It's currently number 4 in Germany, and the album 'Play' is at number
33.
......
Conflicting release dates, hmmmm...
- -Steve
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:47:47 -0800 (PST)
From: bjorkdoll <slurb@scn.org>
Subject: Re: (mobility) moby pic & WDMHFSB? video
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999 Tecknomonk@aol.com wrote:
> also, whoever wants to see the WDMHFSB? video can download the whole thing in
> real player.
> go to:
> http://www.labels.tm.fr/RealData/moby/video/whydoesmyheartfeelsobad.ram
> isn't little idiot just adorable?!?! i can't watch the video without
> shedding a tear.
> :)
I know this is terribly old, but i'm catching up on some backlogged mail.
I finally got a chance to watch this -- i hate not having a vid channel so
the best i get is watching these in a real player. It was so cute. What
an adorably sad video...
sarah
"...a fountain of blood in the shape of a girl..."
( http://www.gurlpages.com/nolabel/bjorkdoll/ )
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:08:31 -0800 (PST)
From: bjorkdoll <slurb@scn.org>
Subject: Re: (mobility) re: those frightening wig pictures
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Hotel Detective Phizzo Jobson wrote:
> i was laughing my ass off! scary, and "do we have to
> see this?" but kinda funny. and for the record, that
> book he covers himself with, i have that book, "the DK
> Encyclopedia of Rock Stars". it mentions him in there,
> i think for one the Michael Jackson remixes. and maybe
> for the Eno mixes.
(another old reply from me) -- haha! i loved those pictures! they were
great! the asian wig was especially fabulous... i checked out that
photographers website and she takes some pretty freaky photos. i love
'em. her website is http://www.prommom.com if you wanna see. be warned
though -- they aren't for sensitive eyes. :)
sarah
"...a fountain of blood in the shape of a girl..."
( http://www.gurlpages.com/nolabel/bjorkdoll/ )
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:36:56 +1000
From: Jane Browning <e.browning@qut.edu.au>
Subject: Re: (mobility) re: those frightening wig pictures
At 17:08 17/01/00 -0800, you wrote:
>
>(another old reply from me) -- haha! i loved those pictures! they were
>great! the asian wig was especially fabulous... i checked out that
>photographers website and she takes some pretty freaky photos. i love
>'em. her website is http://www.prommom.com if you wanna see. be warned
>though -- they aren't for sensitive eyes. :)
I might have to leave having a look at those photo 'til when I get home! I
thought the photos were stunning too, that wig,.... very pompadour. I
would have liked to see a little more lipstick though!
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:14:45 -0600
From: "Brad Caviness" <bigwig@arkansas.net>
Subject: (mobility) Mobility Mixes Moby
Hey listees,
I gotta question for you guys.... I'm putting together a mix disc of remixes
from Play" (with a cut or two from "Animal Rights" and "Score"), and I was
wondering if any of you had completed remixes of "Porcelain" in particular,
and/or any other cuts you have found mix worthy in general. If you have
mixes (for Thanks II) or whatever, let me know, I'd love to check out an mp3
or whatever, and if I use the cut on my cd, I'll make a copy of the cd for
you to kind of share the magic, as it were. Hmm... it occurs to me that
might be an interesting way to present "Thanks II... as a mix disc, if all
of the tracks would work that way.... I seem to remember someone talking
about a ska version of Everytime You Touch Me ages ago. But if they're all
remixes, it would be sweet.
Bradley S. Caviness, Bigwig
Bigwig Enterprises
bigwig@arkansas.net
"I've often wondered how someone could put a critique of music into words.
And I've often wondered why there was no musical commentary on writing."
- Dr. Peter Kreeft, author
"The early bird gets the worm. But the second mouse gets the cheese."
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:04:02 +0100
From: "Bart van Eijck" <eijck@IAE.nl>
Subject: Re: (mobility) Natural Blues on V2?
Scott wrote:
>No worries, I'm not the Record Police....altho' there is one. New laws in
China
>about bootlegged CD's. Plenty of jail-time, and I hear they give Turkish
prisons
>a run for their money.
>Enjoy your CD, those mixes are brilliant.
If it's any comfort to the record companies, I already own all the original
singles with these tracks, so they're not loosing any money because of me.
It's not like I make or sell them or anything...
Anyway, is V2 also going to release a Natural Blues single, and if so, any
info on when this will be? because the first radio promo already was given
out in December 1999! And according to DEF the Natural Blues single
won't be out on Mute in Europe until (like Steve said) March the 6th.
I'm curious about what V2's plans are...
Bart
------------------------------
End of mobility-digest V3 #79
*****************************
-------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to majordomo@xmission.com
with the line "unsubscribe mobility-digest" in the body.