- - I must have been napping when your first message came in)</font></font></font></span><span class=123260800-13062001></span><span class=123260800-13062001><font face="Verdana"><font color="#800080"><font size=-1>I've
read "A Matter of Time" three times so far and have really enjoyed it each
time. It seems that Mr. Cook's habit of pursuing multiple timelines concurrently
(he does it so often - Shadowline and the first Dread Empire book, the
name of which I can't remember off the top of my head, both leap to mind)
was taken to a new extreme in this one, because I also found it very disorienting.
With that said, however, it seems to work every time he does it, even though
it can make the plotline(s) more difficult to follow the first time through
a book...</font></font></font></span><span class=123260800-13062001></span><span class=123260800-13062001><font face="Verdana"><font color="#800080"><font size=-1>I
agree completely with your amazement watching all of the plotlines come
together at the end of the book. I KNEW what was going to happen the first
time I read it and was so far off it's scary. (Although in retrospect I
can't quite remember what it was I thought was going to happen...) I also
missed all of the political references...</font></font></font></span><span class=123260800-13062001></span><span class=123260800-13062001><font face="Verdana"><font color="#800080"><font size=-1>As
a side note, it is because of this book that I was completely psyched to
learn that Cook's next book is going to be a mystery. Although the Garret
books are almost mysteries, A Matter of Time went all the way...</font></font></font></span>