More on Balke and Mortimer, in french and portuguese:
http://blake.citeweb.net/
- -e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g---i-s-
http://www.bellybongo.com
- ----------T-I-K-I----------
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:42:21 +0100
From: Edward Milhuisen <edjunkita@wanadoo.nl>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Process and Product
bigshot wrote:
> I just don't consider editing an art unto itself. It's
> possible with skillful craftsmanship to create an "illusion of
> art".
art IS illusion...the suspension of disbelief.
> Cleverly juggling around snippets of music or film may be
> amusing and impressive as craft, but ultimately, it's a pretty
> empty pursuit for an artist. A real artist creates, he doesn't
> repackage.
But EVERYTHING on this earth is in a dynamic process of constant
repackaging! A real artist's paint comes from chemicals which
the paint factory has repackaged for him. He in his turn takes the
paint from his tube and repackages it on canvas...A person
who views the painting repackages the blobs of paint on the
canvas into an a sequence of neural activity, ad infinitum.
There's no difference between paint and soundsnippets,
> "Choosing" isn't an art. "Creating" is art. An artist may have
> influences, but he isn't just assembling references, he's using
> them as a springboard for his own performance. In an earlier
> post, you mentioned collage as an art... It isn't an art. Picasso
> and Braque didn't just do collages and call them art. They were
> applying collage TO their art. That is using a craft to support
> art.
A musician may use samples, but he isn't just assembling other peoples
sound, he is using samples as a springboard for his own performance.
Musicians are applying sampling TO their music. That is using a craft
to support music.
I think this discussion has gotten to the point where it's nothing more
than pure semantics.
> A musician should be able to play a musical instrument. If he
> can't he's an engineer. Isn't that pretty self-evident?
Nope. In our post modern society all such boundaries are pretty much
becoming history.
> A musician who can't play an instrument and creates his own "art"
> by cannibalizing the music of others is the exact same thing as a
> "creative" producer.
Hey, cannibals have their own important role in the foodchain like every
other organism!
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:20:14 +0100
From: Moritz R <moritz@derplan.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Re: film noir
Brian schrieb:
> If you ever
> heard Johhny Cash singing I walk the Line in German it souds VERY weird at
> least to me.
:-) to me it sounds just plain cute, really.
> But he shouldn't have stopped > working with Bruno S. or whatever that Wild Man Fischer clone was called.
> You mean Klaus Kinski probably. I don't think Bruno Ganz qualifies as a
> Wild Man Fischer clone...
It's strange: As different as these subjects we currently discuss sound: Mute, art, German film... I think they all have the same problems today:over-conceptionalistion on cost of humor. Too much "serious" "theater", too little pop. Too "tough", not easy enough. Actually, the more I think about it, the concept of Neo-Easy Listening is more revolutionary than I ever thought. But try to explain that to art people or filmmakers of the kind of Herzog etc. ... no way they understand!
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:20:17 +0100
From: Moritz R <moritz@derplan.com>
Subject: (exotica) Mute (was: Holger Hiller)
Brian schrieb:
>
> For me part of the problem remained not knowing where the label fit after
> the new wave ended.
that's true. they have gone a bit too far into this noisy neo teutonic concept art scene for my taste. Where's the silly pop fun of Silicon Teens today? Or gay disco like the Communards? It has all become so dead serious.
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:20:24 +0100
From: Moritz R <moritz@derplan.com>
Subject: (exotica) art vs. craft???
alan zweig schrieb:
>
> Mr. bigshot only likes art. He doesn't waste his time with craft.
> Because craft isn't art.
No I don't think that's what he meant. Rather the opposite: art is only good if it is based on "skills" i.e. craft. I *think* that's what he meant.
So what is art? I guess since 100 years art doesn't want to be defined any more. And before, it didn't have to be defined, because it was clear what it was: it was craft. I think I even understand why Steve feels uncomfortable with today's art. because it feels free to define itself and by that opens doors for every charlatan on the scene to step in. maybe the charlatans have even taken over the scene. they control the white cubes, they control the art press. I know how it is.
Still I don't see a point in attacking the freedom of art and making rules. making rules in art can only lead to contradictions. Freedom is the duty of art today. maybe that's because what once was done by handicraft is now done by technology. When photography was invented, painting obviously lost a lot of its businesses. At that point painting became free. A painter didn't have to dublicate reality, s/he could paint phantasies, abstract or whatever. It was good. It was a progress for the human mind.
But this is a long time ago. All avantgarde concepts are dead now. They have no answers for the future. but the avantgardists control the art scene. they don't understand exotica. they don't understand tiki. that can make one mad. but as OK as it is to fight against these people, it would be a mistake to throw out the baby with the bathwater and go back to the thinking of the times before the avantgarde. We can only go further and I didn't read much about that in Steve's theories.
But I understand what makes him mad. I guess in 75% of the cases it's the same things that make me mad. But I blame other reasons for it. For instance capitalism. I think that capitalist freedom has made the word freedom problematic. I think it's there, where one has to dig, if s/he wants to find out what's wrong with art today. And now I'm finally arriving on far-off-topic ground.
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:12:20 +0100 (CET)
From: "Magnus Sandberg" <m.sandberg@telia.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) art vs. craft???
Its so easy but I cant define it. Humour is absolutely necessary, but
also the dark. It must have something hidden in it, a mystery. The
thing that the leading "experts" call art leaves me cold. I find most
of my kind of art in popular media. And it doesnt have to be well
crafted either. An originality. Or an obsession. Sexuality has been my
worry in life, it did not come natural for me like for most either, it
made me evil. But I like sexual art, and even more sensual art. I love
Art Brut, but not graffiti. I should love graffiti but it is so full of
clichees. Not original enough. (Mostly anyway, there is good stuff in
everything). I like comics more than Lichtenstein or Warhol. The old
Dick Tracy adventures by Chester Gould! Krazy Kat! Blake and Mortimer!
There are paintings by Shag, Moritz and Ryden that has everything I
like. Balthus and Philip Guston and Dubuffet is sometimes great. Arthur
Lyman is also Magnus kind of art, allthogh he is not that original. It
is the dark in Lyman I think. Eraserhead is amazing, but I would rather
live in a world where such expression were not necessary. I like
exploitation movies, my favorite film of all time is called "the girl
and the geek". Maybe it is because I find girls sophisticated, and
myself a brute. "Europa" by Lars von Trier is another film that speaks
to me. "Wings of Desire" is the most beautiful film ever. Carl Barks
was a genius. Raymond Roussel and Samuel Beckett is brilliant. So is
Dali and Meyron. Bosch and Caravaggio.
I love the thought of an "Hawaiian Eye"
A dream would be to be a dolphin in a world with no humans. Or an eagle.
I have stopped to listen on people telling me what is good and what is
bad. My truth lies deep within and cant be fooled.
There are so much more that I consider my kind of art, the stuff I
mentioned has been very different on important occasions though.
Magnus
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:45:31 -0500
From: buMp <bump@defectiverecords.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Intent and Dis(re)tortion
i realize this thread is boring the hell out of people so no more retorts
from me.
Chopping up his music and repackaging it is the same as
>colorizing and re-editing Citizen Kane. It's a distortion of what
>the creator intended.
>
this is hardly the same thing.
when using samples i am not trying to re-create the piece i took them from,
i am creating my own work. i do not understand why you cannot separate the two.
in a music piece, a photo collage, or a experimental film or video
i may use many bits of other photos, films, videos or music,
but i have CREATED a work that would be ART according to your definition
(ie. personal expression and artistic skill).
to refuse to accept this as art is a sort of facsism or snobbery.
meaning you only think art should be made by people who have specific
talents you believe are
represent your personal view of what ART is.
>What if someone took your sampled song and added lyrics to it
>talking about how much they love Jesus. Then they performed it
>on TV, calling it their own. Wouldn't that be a distortion of
>what you intended? Would you be mad? Someone mentioned that two
>records used the same sample. How can the one who used the sample
>first be mad? It's not their music to claim ownership of!
>
first of all let me say when i sample music,
i am not taking the "essence" of the song...ie. Vanilla Ice, Hammer etc.
(ie. when you hear it you immediately recognize and relate to the original
piece)
(speaking of which, and not that these are examples of it, but early on,
RAP Music was not considered MUSIC by many people. this is obviously wrong
too.)
my samples usually cannot be understood as the song i originally took them
from.
even so, if someone took my whole original song and added christian lyrics
to it,
i would probably laugh first, then say they sure have balls to use our
entire song as a basis of their track (not much talent in that for sure).
i would not be mad because i believe everything out there is source
material for whatever you want to do. however if i was to take a whole song
from someone or take what i believe is the essence of a song i would ask
for permission to use it and credit it as such.
i would also be a little flattered that someone thought highly enough of my
music to use it.
my original intent is not damaged because my piece still exists as it is.
never to be tainted by a half assed attempt to make another song out of it.
i would probably buy the new song as well, just for the laugh.
>>editing is and always will be what makes good art out of
>>source materials.
>
>Editing doesn't make art out of source materials any more than
>a fancy gold frame makes the Mona Lisa art.
>
editing is far from just throwing a frame around something.
not to understand this is our major problem here.
source materials can no way stand on there own without an editor to turn
them into
a single work of "Art" in my opinion, at least when it comes to film/video
and yes collage!
and to say collage is not an art is ridiculous.
you mean people who make them have no means of personal expression or
skill? damn that is harsh.
you cannot relate everything to painting or music.
that is the same as people saying,
they should not have made the movie Naked Lunch, because the book was so
much better?
comparing genres is silly, and filmmakers do the same to video artists.
you are comparing apples and oranges. like rap music, back in the early
days of photography, it was looked at by many and still a few now as the
work of no-talent painters.
they just felt threatened by it. like it was gonna put them out of business.
is this a concern of yours?
>Right. But editing isn't content. Art is all about content.
>Editing merely presents content concisely, the same way that
>proper lighting makes a painting more beautiful in a
>museum.
>
content is only a part of it. what about the concept and construction?
we are obviously gonna have to agree to disagree on this subject.
cheers
bump
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:46:10 EST
From: Ashleywarren1@aol.com
Subject: Re: (exotica) Intent and Distortion
In a message dated 3/22/01 4:55:26 AM EST, edjunkita@wanadoo.nl writes:
<<
> What if someone took your sampled song and added lyrics to it
> talking about how much they love Jesus. Then they performed it
> on TV, calling it their own.
I'm eagerly awaiting the occasion! >>
This has almost happened! A hymn used in the Catholic church called "Living
In All Men" is a lyrical re-write of Bob Dylan's "Blowin' In The Wind"!
Ashley
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:08:32 +0100
From: Moritz R <moritz@derplan.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) art vs. craft???
Magnus Sandberg schrieb:
> Its so easy but I cant define it. Humour is absolutely necessary, but
> also the dark. It must have something hidden in it, a mystery.
Very well... 100% d'accord! But these things can be embedded in very different scripts. Intellectual constructions, cool strategies etc. You may not even be able to read most of them. I think art should also be kind of explicit, easy to read. Some people would call this "entertaining"; yes, I think art should entertain. From the cradle to the grave ;-)
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:12:41 -0500
From: hagar@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Re: (exotica) Intent and Distortion
>This has almost happened! A hymn used in the Catholic church called >"Living In All Men" is a lyrical re-write of Bob Dylan's "Blowin' In >The Wind"!
Guillame Dufay, wrote the "Messe L'Homme Arme", which was a Mass based on a melody of a popular song of his day. This was all the way back in the 15th century, which is a length of time that almost Dufays description.
Sorry,
Brian Phillips
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:24:16 -0500
From: hagar@mindspring.com
Subject: (exotica) Le Boo Boo
That should have been the Missa L'Homme Arme, not Messe.
Turning a near Missa into another fine Messe,
Brian
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:38:37 -0500
From: hagar@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: (exotica) Coasters on Blow Up A Go-Go
It's on London HLZ 10437 from 1972. It's a great version!
The lyrics are here http://www.lyrics.ch/search/song.asp?song_id=114378&label_id=19027&band_id=6986
and the Clovers' version, which is the original (Stereo or Mono, I can't recall)
has this last line:
"I had so much fun, that I'm going back again,
I wonder what she put in Love Potion Number Ten"
Brian
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:54:08 +0100 (CET)
From: "Magnus Sandberg" <m.sandberg@telia.com>
Subject: (exotica) Vic Mizzy release on CD
VIC MIZZY - SUITES & THEMES
At long last, Percepto Records proudly presents the deluxe limited
release of this eagerly anticipated CD compilation showcasing 36 tracks
of original film & TV scores, including THE GHOST AND MR. CHICKEN, THE
RELUCTANT ASTRONAUT, THE SHAKIEST GUN IN THE WEST, HOW TO FRAME A FIGG,
THE NIGHT WALKER, THE SPIRIT IS WILLING, A VERY SPECIAL FAVOR, THE
CAPER OF THE GOLDEN BULLS, DON'T MAKE WAVES, THE PERILS OF PAULINE and
more!
Also included are Mizzy's most popular TV themes--THE ADDAMS FAMILY and
GREEN ACRES, plus a wide variety of previously unreleased themes,
including THE PRUITTS OF SOUTHAMPTON, THE DOUBLE LIFE OF HENRY PHYFFE,
THE 13th GATE amd KENTUCKY JONES!
All music in this 78-minute collection has been remastered from Mizzy's
original studio masters with most tracks being presented here for the
first time on CD.
This package also contains full-color 24-page booklet with liner notes
by Daniel Schweiger detailing the composer's life and career, including
rare stills, sheet music, poster and lobby card reproductions and much
more!
This promotional release is being offered exclusively through
www.percepto.com and has been pressed in a limited archival edition of
1000 copies.
Buy it here:
http://store.percepto.com/percepto/movtvsoun.html
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.