> >Something can make a good sample and not be "good" in any
> >other way. I would assume that to be obvious but apparently not.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand that at all. If something is good
> enough to steal to use in ones' own song, it must have some sort
> of value.
yes, but only because it gets a value in the new context as a sample. your answer only shows that you simply don't know how (electronic) musicians work today: I would guess that most samples come out of really obscure sources that you wouldn't want to listen to entirely. all they have is a weird little phrase that some musician believes to be valuable for a track s/he's working on. Of course one could try to rerecord that exact sound or phrase, but it would be a senseless effort, just as if you'd want to paint something, when a photo would serve the same needs. Sometimes, according to Dave, musicians just can't afford an entire orchestra, so sampling can also be seen as a form of poetic justice.