(Polynesian songs composed or adapted by Eddie Lund)
Does anyone know how I can get the English translations
for the song titles.
Maybe on the web, some kind of translater site?????
These are for my friend Nelson to arrange for a
CD of Tahitian songs.
Here's some stuff I found on my last trip out to
the country.
Colorful Romantic Hawaii - The Surfmen
(I assume this is an alternate title given for the Australian release?)
At The Candlelight Cafe - The Three Suns
Dream Time - Wayne King & His Orchestra
(such an unfortunate name!)
More Bossa Nover Pops - Joe Harnell
Drifting And Dreaming - Bing Crosby
(I'd never heared lyrics for Beyond The Reef before this)
At The Movies - Enoch Light
Justin from OZ
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 21:18:45 +0000
From: KK <Kahuna.K@hamburg.de>
Subject: Re: (exotica) ghetto-ized pop music
> Kahuna: I have thaught so for quite some time, too. I think the
> developement was furthered after 70s Punk.
>
> audiocarp: I think
> Kahuna is referring to the Anglophilia which a lot of US radio and magazine
> people seem to have. To them any English import has an instant cache. Back
> in the 80s, I admit I caught this 'orrible disease when I first heard the
> Clash, the Specials, Pistols, Damned, Jam, et al. But a couple of years
> later, when all those bands crapped out or broke up, what replaced them?
Kahuna: In the eighties things started to look brighter again, with the 50s
and 60s revivals coming into play really. I liked the british Polecats as much
as The Stray Cats from NY. I liked the Surfadelics and The Fuzztones. The
concept of revival has never left us after the eighties. It got stronger, but
increasingly shallow, and un-street. Now people seem to be belive that any
revival is a righteous one. Which is in my opinion a real anti-progress
opinion. But the current of popular music forced that kind of attitude and
all.
KK
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:19:27 -0400
From: alan zweig <azed@pathcom.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) The Now Sound
At 11:14 AM 9/5/01 -0400, M.Ace wrote:
>
>
>Mention of the Stax instro acts got me thinking of a stab at a more
>technical definition of Now Sound. Here it is for you to lacerate, agree
>with or embroider:
>
>R&B-style instrumentals with de-emphasized soul and cartoonishly
>exaggerated rhythms.
I rise to lacerate.
If you want to say that Now sounds like your description, I guess that's
okay though it doesn't cover all of the things I would throw in the Now
Sound bag.
But it covers the classic stuff.
I guess the only reason I'd dispute this definition is because it's a
description but doesn't really address how the music was made. They didn't
really de-emphasize anything. In fact, in a sense these musicians were
kind of adding soul to the sound they would have "naturally" created.
No, I think the simplest definition is to start with big band music, make
the drummer swing less - play more like Charlie Watts or Ringo - add organ
and/or more rockin guitar (rather than simply using it as a rhythm
instrument).
But the thing which we've all been ignoring - in my case because I don't
know how to talk about it - is that the standards of the sixties were quite
different from the standards of the fifties (and before) which big band and
space-age bachelor lounge musicians played.
And it's not so simple as to say that it was rock n roll. I don't think
Bacharach wrote rock songs. And yet his material fits in with the a lot of
the rock and pop that Now Sound covers.
There are N.S. records which actually try to transform the fifties
standards into the new sound. And they work to some degree. But that
material always sounds different from the more modern tunes. Even the
original tunes on N.S. records have that sound. It's a different way of
writing.
I agree that it's partly the way the bands played. But it's also the
tunes. And I don't know how to talk about music on that level.
AZ
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:19:24 -0400
From: alan zweig <azed@pathcom.com>
Subject: (exotica) Phase Four
At 09:14 AM 9/5/01 +0100, G.R.Reader@bton.ac.uk wrote:
>> I find Phase Four really interesting.
>I've more often been disappointed than stimulated, but there you go.
I didn't say stimulated (though I'm sure you also find them much less
interesting than I do.) I haven't had too many Phase Four records I would
consider Now Sound or in any way "exciting" enough to be called stimulating.
In fact what I find interesting about them is the way they're sort of the
opposite of stimulating. And yet how enjoyable I find them.
I guess I'm thinking particularly of Ronnie Aldrich.
I realize that I've developed a taste for very quiet, soft things. But I
still have my standards. And some things are just too plain, too soft, too
nothing.
But some of those Ronnie Aldrich cuts almost remind me of ambient music or
Brian Eno. And since I know it's just a couple of pianos and an orchestra,
I get the feeling that it's the Phase four recording techniques that
elevate the material.
Not to take anything away from Ronnie's possible genius.
I feel the same way about some of the later Kostelanetz records so I know
that this sound I love can be achieved through arrangements and not just
through recording techniques.
But still, Phase four seems to have this way of making the music just
float....
AZ
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:21:54 -0400
From: "Nathan Miner" <nminer@jhmi.edu>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Ronnie Aldrich
Ronnie's actually had a few really good cuts, good orchestration (which is =
generally where most songs fall apart, in boring composition............) =
- - I like some of his cuts off of the "Twin Pianos" LP.
- - Nate
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 21:44:25 +0000
From: KK <Kahuna.K@hamburg.de>
Subject: Re: (exotica) The Now Sound
> I agree that it's partly the way the bands played. But it's also the
> tunes. And I don't know how to talk about music on that level.
The difference between the 60s music and the tunes of previous decades is that
the 60s standards were composed with a production-sound in mind. Joe Meek,
Phil Spector, Brian Wilson, Detroit and Memphis soul etc. You had those kind
of people before, like Glenn Miller or Martin Denny, but they were recorded in
the same way any other session would be done. So more or less anybody could
get that sound on a cover version, given the same instrumentation.
In the sixties you could still cover the tune, but you couldnÆt sound like
them much anymore. You had to put in some of your own. And if this element was
created by jaded session men, I can easily see / hear that it could have
sounded like now-sound.
A tune that is being composed with a sound in mind, I mean the final sound is
not just an attribute but an integral part of the tune itself. You would leave
more spaces for that. Feature parts for the sake of their sound and groove.
The arrangement happened on a cleaner canvas, with master arrangers being able
to fill the leaner melodic content and harmonic base with a greater variation
of features, than the original recording.
The Beatles and The Beach Boys, in my book, pulled a lot of stops, which is
not as typical sixties, their songs could more commonly mingle among a set of
older tunes.
KK
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:38:52 -0400
From: James Botticelli <jimmybotticelli@home.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Phase Four
on 9/5/01 3:19 PM, alan zweig at azed@pathcom.com wrote:
> I haven't had too many Phase Four records I would
> consider Now Sound or in any way "exciting" enough to be called stimulating.
A used record shop here in Cambridge is named after Phase Four and he has a
pretty groovy tee-shirt as well. It simply says "Phase Four' in swirling
psychedelic lettering. He loves the label he says, but he'll sell anything
that sells...His two 'new arrivals' bins usually contain some tasty items.
He's one of those guys who charges $3.50 for a rekkid instead of most of the
dealers around here who charge $3.99...And so it goes
- --
DJ Jimmy Botticelli
The Groove Merchants
Mobile DJ's For Hire
Disco/House/Latin/Funk
No Talk No Rock
"The cat's in the bag.
The bag's in the river"
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 21:36:16 +0100
From: Michael Jemmeson <michael@moreover.com>
Subject: Re: (exotica) Ronnie Aldrich
Nathan Miner wrote:
>
> Ronnie's actually had a few really good cuts, good orchestration (which is generally where most songs fall apart, in boring composition............) - I like some of his cuts off of the "Twin Pianos" LP.
anyone know which LP of his has his cover of 'Soulful Strut' on?
and, i'm not 100% sure it's on Phase 4, but the Johnny Dankworth
'Million Dollar Collection' - is it any good? it's always priced very
highly. (not as highly though as his 'Zodiac' one)
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:01:46 +0800
From: "william" <king8egg@ms60.url.com.tw>
Subject: (exotica) songs for the jet set
hi all,
not too long ago i finally picked up "songs for the jet set" that siesta
comp. there is a band on here called loveletter and they cover "barbarella"
and one other tune. does anyone have their full length album? does it sound
like this or is it really different from the tracks that are on this?
william in taipei.
# Need help using (or leaving) this mailing list?
# Send the command "info exotica" to majordomo@lists.xmission.com.
# To post, email exotica@lists.xmission.com; replies go to original sender.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:39:08 +0100
From: G.R.Reader@bton.ac.uk
Subject: (exotica) Norrie
I had a look through my Cliff Richard and The Shadows stuff last night and
it looks like Norrie Paramor did do much of the production (or Musical
Supervision) even of the Shadows (without Cliff - or should that be Sir
Cliff), but he didn't write much, the most notable exception being stuff