Up ] PISA ] Composition/Integration ] [ Domain Eng. ] Product Lines ] Certification ] Early Artifacts ] OO & DA ] Org. Principles ] Add. Info. ] References ]


 

3. Domain Engineering Tools

Moderator:

Bill Frakes (Virginia Tech)
wfrakes@vt.edu

Participants:

David Eichmann (University of Houston - Clear Lake)
Christopher Pidgeon (Semantic Designs, Inc.)

Domain engineering has two phases; domain analysis and domain implementation. Domain engineering has matured sufficiently to allow the development of support tools such as DARE [FPF95] and application generator development tools such as Metatool [Cleaveland88].

Automating domain engineering means combining the domain analysis and domain implementation phases into a coherent whole. This involves mapping domain analysis outputs to domain implementation inputs, as a first step to integrating the tools for each. This working group, building on previous work on this topic [DF93][DF96], discussed the automation of domain engineering by linking the outputs of DARE and the inputs of Metatool. This mapping is shown in Figure 2.

The outputs of DARE are a facet table, templates, a generic architecture, a feature table, reusable components, and code structures. These are used to define the inputs to the formal domain language used by Metatool. This formal language consists of a vocabulary, a grammar, and semantics. There was some discussion of the best internal form for the grammar (string graph, or other representation).

The group concluded that automating domain engineering via this approach is feasible, but further research is necessary.

Fig2.gif (8533 bytes)

Figure 2: Linking DARE Outputs to Metatool Inputs


Up ] PISA ] Composition/Integration ] [ Domain Eng. ] Product Lines ] Certification ] Early Artifacts ] OO & DA ] Org. Principles ] Add. Info. ] References ]


Stephen Edwards <edwards@cs.wvu.edu>