Executor 2.0/executorv2.0.iso/pc/linux/extra/docs/maillist/text/archive.96/text2032.txt

Text File | 1996-07-25 | 1.8 KB | 35 lines

[Last post was mangled by Netscape.  Trying again.]X#
M

This is a weird one.ed by Netscape.  Trying again.]X#
M

I haven't had any luck getting Executor/DOS to work for me under the newକ¨á
ö
Windows NT 4.0 beta (build 1234).  No problem, I can't expect to run allକ¨á
ö
beta programs and have them get along all the time.n't expect to run allକ¨á
ö

But I'm also evaluating an X server for NT called eXalt (from Intergraph),•¨á
ö
and I've been running a few apps on my Linux box, with the display going ,•¨á
ö
to my X server on NT.  It's pretty good, and not all *that* slow.  eXalt ,•¨á
ö
is an X11R5 implementation and it puts the X programs right alongside the,•¨á
ö
Windows programs, with them a Win95-looking window manager.  Cool.ide the,•¨á
ö

So I tried running Executor/Linux with the display going to my NT box, and•¨á
ö
it wouldn't start, giving me an error: the display going to my NT box, and•¨á
ö

executor: XError `11': BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) and•¨á
ö
X_CreateCursoror `11': BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) and•¨á
ö


I'm not sure what kind of resources X_CreateCursor needs, but I can sayand•¨á
ö
that Executor is the only program I've found that gives this error. sayand•¨á
ö
Netscape 2.01 for Linux, which I'd consider a "resource" hog in general,nd•¨á
ö
displays happily on eXalt.  I'm guessing I've found an eXalt bug, and I've•¨á
ö
reported it to Intergraph, too, but I'm posting here in case somebody else•¨á
ö
has run into the "BadAlloc with X_CreateCursor" bug on another X server.se•¨á
ö

Of course, other explanations or suggestions are also welcome. X server.se•¨á
ö

Thanks,se, other explanations or suggestions are also welcome. X server.se•¨á
ö
Joe Thomas other explanations or suggestions are also welcome. X server.se•¨á
ö