home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >>>>> "Sam" == Sam Oscar Lantinga <slouken@cs.ucdavis.edu> writes:
- In article <4gtooh$9tg@mark.ucdavis.edu> slouken@cs.ucdavis.edu (Sam Oscar Lantinga) writes:
-
-
- Sam> Just my notes working with Executor 1.99q and 1.99q6
-
- Sam> For some reason 1.99q6 seems MUCH slower than Executor 1.99q
- Sam> The sound slowdown is still there.
-
- Yes. We've fixed "the" slowdown internally and 1.99q7 runs noticeably
- faster. I put "the" in quotes because I'm assuming that the slowdown
- you're seeing is due to the bug we fixed, but we won't know for sure
- until you get a chance to try 1.99q7.
-
- Sam> I play Spaceward Ho! on a 486 DX2/66 running Linux 1.3.68,
- Sam> and I have to restart Executor about every half hour because
- Sam> it slows down like molasses. It takes upwards of 15 seconds
- Sam> for a menu to appear, and the slowdown happens gradually. I
- Sam> believe this is a problem with the Linux sound, because this
- Sam> does not happen under Windows 95. (BTW, sound under Win95 is
- Sam> scratchy on my machine)
-
- It may be your kernel. Lets see what happens when we get 1.99q7 out.
-
- Sam> When I check top, executor is taking upwards of 95% of my
- Sam> CPU.
-
- Sam> This is all under 1.99q because 1.99q6 was too slow to be
- Sam> useable for me.
-
- Sam> Sorry I don't have a better description of what's going on.
-
- So far I don't think we need it. 1.99q7 should be out "soon". Mat
- and I are still hacking DOS floppy/cd-rom/mac-disk bugs. Hopefully
- we'll be done today and roll 1.99q7 tomorrow, although my track record
- for predicting bleeding edge release dates (or any dates, for that
- matter) is pretty bad.
-
- Sam> See ya! -Sam Lantinga (slouken@cs.ucdavis.edu)
-
- --Cliff
- ctm@ardi.com
-
-