home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >>>>> "Charles" == Charles Hunter <huntercr@cs.purdue.edu> writes:
-
- Charles> Personally, I can't believe that Windows95 support [is
- Charles> going to come /would be] before OS/2, afterall there is
- Charles> no native gcc for 95, but we've got two complete
- Charles> followings of gcc for OS/2 ( EMX and gcc/2 )
-
- I believe by the time 2.0 ships there will be a version of gcc we can
- use. At least that's what I think Mat told me.
-
- Charles> I think porting Executor to a native OS/2 VIO app would
- Charles> take less than a week with EMX. And a really *flashy* (
- Charles> threaded, DIVE, etc ) executable could be had within a
- Charles> month.
-
- Most likely we'll work on both concurrently and make them available to
- our customers via the experimental/bleedingedge system we currently
- use.
-
- Charles> Something to think about...
-
- Charles> Sheesh.. I'd even do the port if you all ( ARDI ) would
- Charles> like 8-)
-
- We may ask you questions, but it's too early to tell.
-
- Charles> Just some thoughts.
-
- Charles> -- Charles Hunter
-
- --Cliff
- ctm@ardi.com
-
-
-
-