home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Garcia <kender@esu.edu> writes:
-
- Daniel> I was just wondering what keeps executor from running
- Daniel> under NT? I am very interested in seeing executor work
- Daniel> under NT< and have an NT platform I would be willing to do
- Daniel> testing work on (development as well?
-
- Do you mean as an actual Windows NT app that coexists with other NT
- apps in a separate window, or as a DOS DPMI client? If the former,
- then the answer is "time". We'd like to do that after we release 2.0.
- I haven't investigated the various NT ports of the GNU compilation
- tools, but I've heard they are out there. If your question is the
- latter, then the answer is "if it doesn't work already, then hopefully
- 1.99l will."
-
- Daniel> Other than that, executor's a GREAT problem - I use it to
- ^^^^^^^
-
- Freudian slip? :-)
-
- Daniel> now, if i could run executor/dos under dosemu.... *laugh* :)
-
- We would be ecstatic if this could be made to work. It would cut down
- on our DOS debugging cycle dramatically, which would free up more time
- for other development (e.g. getting the NEXTSTEP port running again,
- which is high on my priority list). Executor/DOS 1.99l should be a
- well-behaved DPMI client (using djgpp V2). I'd be interested in
- working with the dosemu folks to get Executor running under dosemu. I
- can tell them exactly what we do and even send them source code
- snippets.
-
- -Mat
-
-