home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u8tib-0007rla; Mon, 15 Apr 96 13:13 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u8ti0-0007rkn; Mon, 15 Apr 96 13:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!Default.ibm.net!purdymj
- From: purdymj@Default.ibm.net
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: RE: Let's get System 7.x on top!
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 19:36:27 GMT
- Organization: ADVANTIS
- Lines: 11
- Message-ID: <b14.9/21/95M27.4405497@Default.ibm.net>
- References: <ufratq8o77.fsf@ftp.ardi.com>
- Reply-To: purdymj@ibm.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slip166-72-237-90.ny.us.ibm.net
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader 4.0
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- > Dwight> I favour implementation of MacOS overlay before a port to
- > Dwight> Win95(aka Mac85).
- >
- >We will embark on both simultaneously. There are drawbacks to waiting
- >for the completion of either before starting the other. However, a
- >port to Windows '95 is *much* easier (and less complicated legally)
- >and will probably finish much sooner than the drop-in feature.
-
-
- Would a native Win95 version inherently run faster than the DOS version (being that it would be 32bit)
-
-