home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u8ffr-0007rla; Sun, 14 Apr 96 22:13 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u8ffA-0007rjn; Sun, 14 Apr 96 22:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.WARWICK.NET!usenet
- From: 71231.104@compuserve.com (Richard Slobod)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: How hard is it??? A question about emulation...
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:20:06 GMT
- Organization: Warwick Online
- Lines: 12
- Message-ID: <4kr03c$rte@news1.warwick.net>
- References: <316c692d.14852708@news.iquest.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: m2-12.warwick.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- digiscream@iquest.net (The ][ntruder) wrote:
- >Is there a legal issue with emulating hardware, such as support
- >hardware, in software? What I'm getting to is could the focus of
- >Executor to be to handle and emulate the hardware emulation to such an
- >extent that you could have a perfect representation of a particular
- >Mac, such as an LC or such, so that you could purchase the OS from
- >Apple and have a full emulatuion... rather than futzing with makinga
- >clean software emulation of the OS??? I know the base Roms would have
- >to be legally implimented.
-
- They _are_ planning on doing a version that works like that.
-
-
-