home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.96 / text2016.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-07-25  |  1.5 KB  |  42 lines
  1.     id m0tuiLB-0007r1a; Thu, 7 Mar 96 09:14 MST
  2. Sender: owner-executor
  3. Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
  4.     (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tuiK4-0007rFn; Thu, 7 Mar 96 09:13 MST
  5. Path: sloth.swcp.com!usenet
  6. From: Clifford T. Matthews <ctm@ardi.com>
  7. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  8. Subject: Re: Q: Does Executor support 68K Co-Processor card?
  9. Date: 07 Mar 1996 09:03:17 -0700
  10. Organization: ARDI
  11. Lines: 19
  12. Message-ID: <ufg2bkyjp5.fsf@ftp.ardi.com>
  13. References: <4hki63$lq2$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com>
  14. NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.ardi.com
  15. In-reply-to: muliani's message of 6 Mar 1996 17:31:47 GMT
  16. X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0
  17. To: executor@ardi.com
  18. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  19. Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
  20. Precedence: bulk
  21.  
  22. >>>>> "Muliani" == muliani  <103350.1222@CompuServe.COM> writes:
  23. In article <4hki63$lq2$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> muliani <103350.1222@CompuServe.COM> writes:
  24.  
  25.  
  26.     Muliani>         Hi, I want to know whether Executor support a 68K
  27.     Muliani> co-processor card on PC platform?  Best regards,
  28.  
  29.     Muliani> (MULIANI) --
  30.         
  31. No, Executor doesn't support 68k coprocessors.  Executor/NEXSTEP runs
  32. on 68k based NeXTs, so we know how to support 68k based machines, but
  33. such co-processors are too few in number for it to be worth our
  34. limited engineering resources to support them.  The only reason we
  35. support NEXSTEP is that's where we started and we owe it to our
  36. original customers.
  37.  
  38. --Cliff
  39. ctm@ardi.com
  40.  
  41.  
  42.