Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA20059 for <executor@nacm.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 1995 12:12:35 -0700
Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id NAA04639 for nacm.com!executor; Wed, 19 Jul 1995 13:12:34 -0600
Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp
Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
id m0sYeVa-00005mC; Wed, 19 Jul 95 13:10 MDT
Message-Id: <m0sYeVa-00005mC@beaut.ardi.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 13:10 MDT
From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews)
To: executor@nacm.com
Subject: Executor/DOS 1.99o under Windows '95
Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi Folks,
We don't have Windows '95, so finding out the answer to this problem
is difficult for us. I know some of you are having great success
running Executor under Windows '95, and I'm assuming that your success
includes E/D 1.99o.
Does anyone know a workaround to the problems discussed below? We'll
try to get them to not happen, but a workaround in the meantime would
be much appreciated.
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
Return-Path: <aiegserv.corp.mot.com!moseler>
Received: by mailhost (nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11)
id m0sYHsq-000YbmC; Tue, 18 Jul 95 13:00 MDT
Received: from motgate.mot.com (motgate.mot.com [129.188.136.100]) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA23034 for <bugs@ardi.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 09:05:24 -0600
Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.7) with ESMTP id KAA07742 for <bugs@ardi.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:04:53 -0500
Received: from aiegserv.corp.mot.com (aiegserv.ccrl.mot.com [182.1.12.2]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.7) with SMTP id KAA16943 for <bugs@ardi.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:04:52 -0500
Message-Id: <199507181504.KAA16943@pobox.mot.com>
Received: from clemson by aiegserv with SMTP
(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA10749; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 09:58:03 -0500
Received: by clemson
(1.37.109.4/16.2) id AA06510; Tue, 18 Jul 95 10:04:45 -0500
Reply-To: <moseler@aiegserv.corp.mot.com>
Return-Receipt-To: <moseler@server1>
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
From: Scott Moseler <moseler@aiegserv.corp.mot.com>
To: bugs@ardi.com
Cc: moseler@server1 (Scott Moseler)
Subject: executor 1.99o and win95
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 10:04:45 CDT
I am having a similar problem with executor 1.99n-1.99o under windows 95. I am
using the June Test Release (version 4.00.490). My computer is a P5-90 with
32MB ram with ATI MACH 64 graphics.
I let windows 95 boot, then open a MS-DOS Prompt window and run executor. If
I select the drive icon in the upper left corner and then double click on 'c/:'
executor hangs up. If I move the mouse around the arrow location seems to get
updated about every 15 seconds.
If I use F8 and boot windows 95 using '6. Command prompt only' executor does
not hang and will bring up the 'c/:' directory window.
If I you need additional information please let me know. I am willing to help
try to figure out what is wrong.
Scott
moseler@aiegserv.corp.mot.com
>
> From: "Michael H. Jackson" <mjackson@cln.etc.bc.ca>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 10:14:57 -0700
> Subject: 1.99n dos and win95
>
> I have not been successful ingetting 1.99n (or n4 or n5) to work on my
> system. I was fairly happy with 1.99m but things have regressed for me!
>
> I am using a 486-DX66 with 16Mb of memory and an ATI Mach 64 video card. I
> would prefer not to use the vesa2 extensions.
>
> My problems are various:
> It takes forever to start and spends much time checking the floppy.
> When I click on the d: drive icon in the hot bar, it hangs pronto.
>
> I have tried several reinstallations and configuration permutations. Is
> anyone else having similar problems? I suspect there may be a hardware
> problem as I still have problems if I boot to my old dos 6.2.
