home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA08374 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 04:24:46 -0700 Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id FAA15523 for nacm.com!executor; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 05:24:45 -0600 Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp (nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0sSjbS-000YbmC; Mon, 3 Jul 95 05:23 MDT Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0sSjbS-00000BC; Mon, 3 Jul 95 05:23 MDT Message-Id: <m0sSjbS-00000BC@beaut.ardi.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 95 05:23 MDT From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews) To: executor@nacm.com Subject: 1.99n status report Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk Hi Folks, I said I wouldn't leave until 1.99n shipped, and I haven't left yet. However, we did find two bugs, one fairly critical, one fairly benign that show up when using a VESA 2.0 compliant video card under Executor/DOS. For that reason, 1.99n is on hold. The fix will be done by either Cotton or Mat, both of whom are asleep right now. In the meantime, I'm working on making our new FAQ even better, since the rest of Executor is "code frozen". So, depending on my unpredictable sleep schedule (I take a nap on the couch whenever I need to), and depending on the nature of these two bugs, 1.99n may be held up a few more hours, or another day. I doubt that there is anyone on this list who is more annoyed by this slippage than I am. --Cliff