home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net (smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net [165.87.194.252]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA21926 for <executor@nacm.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 19:41:52 -0700 Received: by smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net (5.67b/4.03) id AA166240; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 02:41:51 GMT Message-Id: <199506080241.AA166240@smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net> Received: from slip7-1.fl.us.ibm.net(129.37.7.1) by smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net via smap (V1.3mjr) id smamV4Crx; Thu Jun 8 02:41:49 1995 Date: Wed, 07 Jun 95 22:42:06 EDT From: pgunn01@pop01.ca.us.ibm.net (Pat Gunn) Reply-To: pgunn01@ibm.net (Pat Gunn) To: executor@nacm.com X-Mailer: PMMail (v1.0 PreRelease) Subject: Re: executor-digest V1 #170 Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk >To users running Executor/DOS with OS/2 >- --------------------------------------- >The following e-mail message was sent to me here at ARDI: > > "I am interested in testing Executor on my system. I am > currently running os/2 with windows and dos support. For > some reason I can't seem to get Executor to run. I was > wondering if I need "real" dos and not dos support in order > for Executor to run?" Ask him what he gets when he tries to start it. Is he running it command line or from an object? Did he set the directory correctly? If it's session settings, I could send him mine for memory, etc. >Does anyone know the answer to his question? >I have never used OS/2, however, I've seen posts from people who >have used Executor/DOS with OS/2. Oh, It'd be nice to see an Executor/OS2 --------------------------------------------------- Pat Gunn, of Team OS/2, Libertarian party, and the Internet. "And thus came the great god known as PMMail, and with him came Neko, the forgotten one" Live long and Operate at a Higher Level