We believe that 1.99j is fairly stable. As such, 1.99k won't be out
until we have integrated our new file browser and fixed the filesystem
bugs that remain that show up in the file browser. After that, we'll
add System 7 spoofing, and as always, we're doing tons of bug fixing
as we add features.
We're sufficiently happy with the 1.99j release that we're putting the
Linux version on sunsite and the DOS version on SimTel. It will be a
little while before they appear there.
ftp.ardi.com and www.ardi.com will be on-line soon, but they will
initially be (until we get Executor sales ramped up) fairly slow and
we may have to limit access to mirror sites.
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
From owner-executor Mon Feb 27 17:24:44 1995
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id RAA22967 for executor-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 17:24:44 -0800
Received: from netcom12.netcom.com (netcom12.netcom.com [192.100.81.124]) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA22962 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 17:24:39 -0800
From: pageone@netcom.com
Received: by netcom12.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id RAA14671; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 17:15:44 -0800
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 17:15:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Is there a sidegrade to Executor/Linux from Executor/Dos?
I'd like to be able to sidegrade to Executor/Linux if possible,
either when the registration numbers are sent by e-mail or for a nominal
fee. I'm moving into Linux now, and being able to run Macintosh Word 5.0
(assuming, hopefully 1.99j fixes it - I'll try it out tonight!) on Linux
is a big thing since there are currently no native Linux WP's out
there...
Thanks! I'll surely be posting 1.99j comments when I get 'spare
time' to play with it. I've got the files to Netcom, I just have to
download them to my computer now... thanks!
- Chad Page
From owner-executor Mon Feb 27 22:04:55 1995
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA26868 for executor-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 22:04:55 -0800
Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA26746 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 22:04:40 -0800
Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id XAA07869 for nacm.com!executor; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 23:07:05 -0700
Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp
(nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0rjKyo-000YdkC; Mon, 27 Feb 95 23:00 MST
Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
id m0rjKyo-00003GC; Mon, 27 Feb 95 23:00 MST
Message-Id: <m0rjKyo-00003GC@beaut.ardi.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 95 23:00 MST
From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews)
To: executor@nacm.com
Subject: Executor/DOS 1.99j BUGS
Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi Folks,
Executor/DOS 1.99j has major problems on some machines. There appear
to actually be at least two causes of trouble.
One problem is the new memory autodetection code can cause problems.
You can get around this bug by always specifying "-applzone" (note,
there is no "e" between the "l" and "z", because it stands for
Application Zone, not Apple Computer Zone) option.
executor -applzone 4096
will dedicate 4 MB to a section of memory that your programs will see
as the amount of memory the "Mac" on which they're running has
allocated for them. (Internally, we'll use more than 4 MB, because we
also have to have memory for our synthetic CPU, the graphics routines,
translation space, misc. buffers, and so on). We're looking into
what circumstances cause our new autodetect code to fail.
If that workaround doesn't help you, you may find that running
Executor from a DOS shell under Windows will help you. Something we
are doing around the time when we're checking out which disks you have
on your machine appears to have difficulties with "cwsdpmi" the free
DPMI provider that we're using. If you run under Windows, you get
Windows as a DPMI provider and the bug does not appear. We're working
with cws to find out whether it's a cwsdpmi bug or whether it's our
bug that just happens to only show up under cwsdpmi.
I apologize for the inconvenience. I personally spent many hours
testing E/D 1.99j before shipping it off and making the announcement.
However, I didn't turn a copy over to Vaune Fischer, our wonderful
technical support person, because it seemed to work so well and I knew
that we desperately needed a 1.99h replacement. One of the machines I
normally do testing on over here is away being repaired and another
one was in the process of getting groomed to be our FTP/WWW server.
It's always something.
I'll send more e-mail as we make progress.
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
From owner-executor Tue Feb 28 00:35:46 1995
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id AAA28826 for executor-outgoing; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:35:46 -0800
Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA28821 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:35:41 -0800
Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id BAA11422 for nacm.com!executor; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 01:38:12 -0700
Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp
(nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0rjNL2-000YdkC; Tue, 28 Feb 95 01:31 MST
Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
id m0rjNL3-00003GC; Tue, 28 Feb 95 01:31 MST
Message-Id: <m0rjNL3-00003GC@beaut.ardi.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 01:31 MST
From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews)
To: executor@nacm.com
Subject: E/D 1.99j bug found and fixed, 1.99k out soon
Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi folks,
If you're an Executor/DOS user and you haven't yet picked up 1.99j, my
suggestion is that you don't, and that you wait for 1.99k. The major
bugs that we could reproduce over here are fixed, but we won't be
putting 1.99k out until we've tested it for a day on every machine we
