Received: from relay1.UU.NET (relay1.UU.NET [192.48.96.5]) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA23710 for <executor@nacm.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 1994 11:26:52 -0800
Received: from sloth.swcp.com by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQxwgr14736; Wed, 28 Dec 1994 14:26:45 -0500
Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id MAA23812; Wed, 28 Dec 1994 12:27:07 -0700
Received: from gwar.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp
(nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0rN3sn-000Ye8C; Wed, 28 Dec 94 12:18 MST
Received: by gwar.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
id m0rN3sn-000GTSC; Wed, 28 Dec 94 12:18 MST
Message-Id: <m0rN3sn-000GTSC@gwar.ardi.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 12:18 MST
From: mat@ardi.com (Mat Hostetter)
To: avi@vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Slow start of 1.99d
In-Reply-To: <199412280909.BAA15265@nacm.com>
References: <199412280909.BAA15265@nacm.com>
cc: executor@nacm.com
Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
>>>>> "avi" == avi <avi@vnet.ibm.com> writes:
avi> My initial experience with 1.99d is that on my P90 machine it
avi> takes it almost forever to come up. Once it is up its
avi> performance is OK. It took it several minutes to start and I
avi> almost thought it got stuck. Any ideas? Is it a known
avi> problem?
We've never seen this before; on our P90's Executor starts up almost
instantly. Do you have SCSI peripherals it might be scanning, or
anything unusual in your hardware setup? We'd appreciate whatever