home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group J. Gargano
- Request for Comments: 1834 K. Weiss
- Category: Informational University of California, Davis
- August 1995
-
-
- Whois and Network Information Lookup Service
- Whois++
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
- does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
- this memo is unlimited.
-
- I. Introduction
-
- As currently defined, NICNAME/WHOIS [HARR85] service is a TCP
- transaction based query/response server, running on a few specific
- central machines, that provides netwide directory service to Internet
- users. The Network Information Center (NIC) maintains the central
- NICNAME database and server, defined in RFC 954, providing online
- look-up of individuals, network organizations, key host machines, and
- other information of interest to users of the Internet. The
- usefulness of this service has lead to the development of other
- distributed directory information servers and information retrieval
- tools and it is anticipated more will be created. Many sites now
- maintain local directory servers with information about individuals,
- departments and services at that specific site.
-
- Typically these directory servers are network accessible. Local
- development of these services has resulted in wide variations in the
- type of data stored, access methods, search schemes, and user
- interfaces. The purpose of the Whois and Network Information Lookup
- Service Working Group (WNILS) is to expand and define the standard
- for WHOIS types of services, to resolve issues associated with the
- variations in access and provide a consistent and predictable service
- across the network. This memo describes new features for WHOIS to
- meet these goals.
-
- II. Architecture
-
- The WHOIS service should be provided in a client/server model. There
- are no restrictions on the design of the client, provided it is
- capable of passing queries to the server in the proper format, and
- capturing the server's response in some useful format. Existing
- WHOIS specifications call for clients to display responses in human-
- readable form. This more general proposal does not impose that
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- restriction.
-
- This paper acknowledges the existence of many distributed information
- servers, and anticipates the creation of many more. To help users
- locate WHOIS servers, each server should have a nameserver entry in
- the form "whois.domain", i.e. whois.internic.net.
-
- III. Client Design and Behavior
-
- The client provides the user interface to the WHOIS system and a
- mechanism for query generation and display of the response. The
- client is responsible for providing support for paging of long output
- from the server. All clients must provide this service. The server
- will not include any special characters, or make any efforts to
- control output to a screen.
-
- Special search criteria may be specified by the use of keywords or
- special characters, some of which are defined in RFC 954. Clients
- should be designed to make support for quoted strings unnecessary.
-
- IV. Server Design and Behavior
-
- The server should return the same information in response to a given
- query consistently, regardless of the client software or the hardware
- used to originate the query. Queries should be evaluated on a case-
- insensitive basis. Spaces should not be considered in searches. A
- search for "La Russo" should return both "LaRusso" and "La Russo" as
- matches.
-
- There are three types of data records supported in this proposal:
- records for people, hosts, and domains.
-
- Individual records
-
- Name Name of the individual required
-
- Organization Name of the organization required
-
- Organization-type Type of organization optional
- (university, commercial research)
-
- Work-telephone Work telephone number optional
-
- Fax-telephone Fax telephone number optional
-
- Work-address Work postal address optional
-
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- Title Working title or position optional
- within an organization
-
- Department Department optional
-
- Email-address Email address in RFC 822 optional
- format for this individual
-
- Handle A unique identifier for this required
- record on the local server
-
- Last-record-update Date this record was last required
- updated
-
- Home-telephone Home telephone number optional
-
- Home-address Home postal address optional
-
-
- Host records
-
- Hostname Full domain name required
- IPAddress Address required
- Sysadmin-name System administrator name optional
- Sysadmin-phone System administrator telephone optional
- Sysadmin-address System administrator address optional
- Sysadmin-email System admin. e-mail address optional
- Machine-type Type of machine optional
- OS Operating system optional
- MX Mail exchanger optional
- Last-update Last update optional
- Info Location of additional optional
- information (i.e. anonymous FTP)
-
-
- Domain records
-
- Domain-name Domain name registered with required
- the Network Information Center
- (NIC)
-
- Network-address Network address associated required
- with this domain name
-
- Admin-name Name of the Administrative required
- Contact for this domain
-
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- Admin-address Postal address of the required
- Admintistrative Contact for
- this domain
-
- Admin-telephone Telephone number of the required
- Admintistrative Contact for
- this domain
-
- Admin-email Electronic mail address in required
- RFC 1822 format for the
- Administrative Contact for
- this domain
-
- Tech-name Name of the Technical Contact required
- for this domain
-
-
- Tech-address Postal address of the required
- Administrative Contact
- for this domain
-
- Tech-telephone Telephone number of the required
- Technical Contact for this
- domain
-
- Tech-email Electronic mail address in required
- RFC 822 format for the
- Administrative Contact
- for this domain
-
- Nameservers Primary domain nameservers optional
- for this domain
-
- Last-update Last date this record was required
- updated
-
- Search Options
-
- A unique handle must be provided for every record in the server
- database to target specific records for display. For example, if
- there are three individuals named, respectively, A. La Russo, B.
- LaRusso, and C. Larusso, then a search for "LA RUSSO" would return
- all three as matches. However, each record would have a unique
- handle, i.e. LARUSSO1, LARUSSO2, and LARUSSO3. A search for any one
- of these handles would return a single match for that particular
- individual. This is consistent with the RFC 954 query, "whois
- !SMITH1"
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- Other search options which should be supported are:
-
- whois smith exact match on last name
-
- whois smith,j exact match on last name, first name
- whois "smith,j" begins with "J"
- whois j. Smith
- whois "j. Smith"
-
- whois smith, john exact match on last and first names
- whois "smith, john"
- whois john Smith
- whois "john Smith"
- whois .john Smith
- whois "smith..." all last names beginning
- whois smith* with Smith
- whois begins smith
-
- whois smith?? all last names beginning with
- "Smith" and containing up to two
- letters after "Smith", i.e. "Smith",
- "Smithy", "Smithey" and "Smithie"
-
- whois ends smith all last names ending in "smith"
-
- whois exact A Martinez exact match for "A Martinez"
-
- whois fuzzy paulson all last names that sound like or
- are spelled like "Paulson"
-
- whois first Kazuko exact match on first name "Kazuko"
-
- whois first begins Art all first names beginning with "Art"
-
- whois first fuzzy Kasuko all first names that sound like or are
- spelled like "Kasuko"
-
- whois hamlet.ucdavis.edu IP address and other information
- whois system hamlet.ucdavis.edu on the computer called
- hamlet.ucdavis.edu.Could be served
- by a domain name service querytype
- (QTYPE) *
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- whois system hamlet IP address and other
- information on the computer called
- hamlet with the default domain
- appended. Could be served by a
- domain name service querytype
- (QTYPE) *
-
- whois 128.120.2.9 domain name and other
- whois system 128.120.2.9 information on the computer at
- specified IP address. Could be served
- by a domain name service querytype
- (QTYPE) PTR.
-
- whois !ucdavis-dom site contacts and other
- whois domain ucdavis.edu information on the site ucdavis
-
- If any keywords are specified in the query, the server will complete
- that specific query and return the results, even if 0 matches are
- found. If no keywords are specified, the server will interpret the
- query based upon the rules above. Optionally, the server may be
- configured so that if a search yields no matches, the query will
- automatically be run again, but with the keyword begin inserted.
-
- Servers must support multiple levels of detail in response to
- queries. A query yielding multiple matches should return a short-
- form record for each match. A query yielding a single match should
- return a long-form record. A query yielding no matches should return
- context-sensitive help on expanding the search criteria.
-
- On-line Help
-
- The client should return a minimal (two line) help message for every
- query sent to the server. That message should identify the database
- being searched and provide instructions for the user to obtain more
- detailed help screens.
-
- Additional help should be provided in special situations. The server
- should recognize queries that return zero matches, and provide a
- brief help message explaining how to broaden a search. If a search
- returns more than 50 matches, the server should take two actions.
- First, the user should get a message explaining how to narrow
- searches. Second, the user should be offered the option of re-
- specifying the search, or receiving all matching responses. When
- multiple matches are found and returned to the client, the server
- should add a brief help message explaining how to use handles to
- narrow the search to a single record.
-
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1834 Whois++ Lookup Service August 1995
-
-
- If the client queries for "help" or "?" then the server should return
- a complete help file. The help file should contain information in
- sufficient detail for the user to understand and access all the
- features of WHOIS service.
-
- V. Extensibility
-
- This RFC defines a limited set of data records and fields for
- reliable whois queries. Mechanisms exist for whois clients to
- discover extended data records and query for fields not defined in
- this memo. It is recommended that Whois clients and servers include
- this functionality to maximize the extensibility and usefulness of
- this service.
-
- VI. References
-
- [Harr85] Harrenstein, K., Stahl, M., and E. Feinler, E.,
- "NICNAME/WHOIS", RFC 954, SRI, October 1985.
-
- VII. Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
- VIII. Authors' Addresses
-
- Joan Gargano
- Information Technology
- Distributed Computing Analysis and Support
- University of California
- Davis, CA 95616
-
- EMail: jcgargano@ucdavis.edu
-
-
- Ken Weiss
- Information Technology
- Distributed Computing Analysis and Support
- University of California
- Davis, CA 95616
-
- EMail: krweiss@ucdavis.edu
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Gargano & Weiss Informational [Page 7]
-
-