home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group Federal Networking Council
- Request For Comments: 1816 August 1995
- Obsoletes: 1811
- Category: Informational
-
-
- U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
- does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
- this memo is unlimited.
-
- Abstract
-
- This memo provides an update and clarification to RFC 1811. This
- document describes the registration policies for the top-level domain
- ".GOV". Thus far, Federal Agencies and their subsidiaries have
- registered without any guidance. This has resulted in multiple
- registrations for Federal Agencies and naming schemes that do not
- facilitate responsiveness to the public. This document fixes this by
- restricting registrations to coincide with the approved structure of
- the US government. The document cited, FIPS 95-1, provides a
- standard recognized structure into which domain registrations for
- .GOV can be fit. This policy is exactly comparable to that for the
- top-level domains. The IANA requires that an organization/country
- apply for and get a 2 letter code from ISO/ITU (e.g., US for United
- States) for additional top-level registration.
-
- As a side effect, this reduces the number of .GOV level registrations
- and reduces the workload on the Internic.
-
- U.S. GOVERNMENT INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES POLICY
-
- The .GOV domain is delegated from the root authority to the US
- Federal Networking Council. The .GOV domain is for registration of
- US governmental entities on the federal level only. Registrations
- for state and local governmental agencies shall be made under the .US
- domain in accordance with the policies for that domain.
-
- 1) The document "Codes for the Identification of Federal and
- Federally Assisted Organizations", FIPS 95-1 (or its successor)
- lists the official names of US Government agencies.
-
- A) Top-level entities (e.g., those with codes ending in 00 such as
- "1200 Department of Agriculture"), and independent agencies and
- organizations (e.g., "National Science Foundation and other non-
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- indented listings unless prohibited below) as listed in this
- document are eligible for registration directly under .GOV.
-
- B) Autonomous law enforcement components of top-level entities
- (e.g., "Federal Bureau of Investigation", "Secret Service", "Coast
- Guard") are also eligible for registration.
-
- C) Cross-agency collaborative organizations (e.g., "Federal
- Networking Council", "Information Infrastructure Task Force") are
- eligible for registration under .GOV upon presentation of the
- chartering document and are the only non-FIPS-listed
- organizations eligible for registration under .GOV.
-
- D) Subsidiary, non-autonomous components of top-level or other
- entities are not eligible for separate registration.
- International organizations listed in this document are NOT
- eligible for registration under .GOV.
-
- E) Organizations listed as "Federally Aided Organizations" are not
- eligible for registration under .GOV and should register under
- .ORG or other appropriate top-level domain.
-
- F) Organizations subsidiary to "Department of Defense" must
- register under the ".MIL" domain via the Defense Data Network
- Network Information Center - contact registrar@nic.ddn.mil.
-
- The only standard exceptions to these rules are changes to
- governmental structure due to statutory, regulatory or executive
- directives not yet reflected in the above document. The requesting
- agency should provide documentation in one of the above forms to
- request an exception. Other requests for exception should be
- referred to the Federal Networking Council.
-
- 2) A domain name should be derived from the official name for the
- organization (e.g., "USDA.Gov" or "Agriculture.GOV".) The
- registration shall be listed in the registration database under the
-
- official name (per FIPS 95-1) for the organization or under the name
- in the chartering document.
-
- 3) Only ONE registration and delegation shall be made per agency.
- The .GOV registration authority shall provide registrations on a
- first-come first-served basis. It is an individual agency matter as
- to which portion of the agency is responsible for managing the domain
- space under a delegated agency domain.
-
- 4) Those agencies and entities that have multiple registrations under
- .GOV may retain them for a maximum of 3 years from the publication
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- date of this document. Within 6 months after the publication of this
- document, one permanent domain must be selected for the agency. The
- other (auxiliary) domains must cease further sub-delegations and
- registrations at this time. As of 1 year after the publication of
- this document, the auxiliary domains will become undelegated and will
- revert to the control of the .GOV owner. As of 2 years after the
- publication of this document, all registrations in the auxiliary
- domains must be mirrored in the permanent domain and those names should
- be used where possible. At the 3 year point, all auxiliary domain
- registrations will be deleted.
-
- 5) Those agencies and entities already registered in .GOV but not
- listed in FIPS 95-1 (e.g., DOE labs, state entities) may retain their
- registration within the constraint of the single registration rule
- (see para 4). No further non-FIPS-listed registrations will be made.
- State and local entities are strongly encouraged to re-register under
- .US, but this is not mandatory.
-
- References
-
- [1] Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 95-1 (FIPS
- PUB 95-1, "Codes for the Identification of Federal and Federally
- Assisted Organizations", U.S. Department of Commerce, National
- Institute of Standards and Technology, January 4, 1993.
-
- [2] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation", RFC
- 1591, USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1994.
-
- Addendum
-
- CLARIFICATION
-
- * All current registrations in .GOV are grandfathered and do NOT
- require re-registration with the exception of duplicate registrations
- for the SAME organization at the same level. E.g., two registrations
- which represent the Department of Transportation would be duplicates;
- registrations for each of the Department of Transportation and the
- FAA would not (The FAA is an autonomous component contained within
- the DOT).
-
- * The policy requires resolution of all duplicate registrations
- within the next three years.
-
- * Local and state agencies registered under the ".GOV" domain may
- remain there. However, they are strongly encouraged to transfer to
- the US domain.
-
- * Cross-agency collaborative efforts may register under ".ORG" or
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- ".US" as an alternative to asking for an exception to the policy.
-
- FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS / ANSWERS
-
- EXISTING .GOV REGISTRATIONS
-
- Q. What are examples of FIPS-95-1 Departments possessing duplicate
- top level domain names, and what guidance has been given to them
- regarding these names?
-
- A. Examples of FIPS-95-1 Departments with duplicate DNS' include
- "STATE.GOV" and "LABOR.GOV". These departments have six months to
- determine which name is permanent and which is auxiliary and three
- years to drop the auxiliary registration.
-
-
- Q. Currently, our services are defined as www.cdc.gov, ftp.cdc.gov,
- and gopher.cdc.gov. Does this proposal mean that our names will now
- be: www.ntb.ops.cdc.phs.dhhs.gov, etc or at a minimum:
- www.cdc.phs.dhhs.gov, ftp.cdc.phs.dhhs.gov, and
- gopher.cdc.phs.dhhs.gov?
-
- A. In the case of CDC, NIST, NIH, FDA, and the numerous other non-
- FIPS-95-1 agencies registered with ".GOV" domains, there will be no
- changes. The existing DNSs of these agencies are grandfathered under
- this policy. In addition, the policy effects only the domains
- allowed to be registered directly under .GOV; further delegations are
- under the control of the subdomain owner. For the above, assuming
- the HHS subdomain owner concurs, there is no problem with the HHS
- registering "cdc.dhhs.gov" as a subdomain of "dhhs.gov".
-
-
- Q. How will registrations by Federal Laboratories be addressed?
-
- A. The existing domain names will be grandfathered, i.e., LBL.GOV.
- Any new registrations will generally be within the domain of the
- sponsoring agency (and subject to that agencies policies), within the
- .US domain as a geographic entity, or within the .ORG domain.
-
-
- Q. What are some examples of state government agencies registered
- under ".GOV" domain? Will they need to change their DNS?
-
- A. Examples of cities and states that originally registered under
- the ".GOV" include:
-
- WA.GOV Department of Information Services, State of Washington
- LA.GOV Bureau of Sanitation, City of Los Angeles
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- These entities are strongly encouraged to reregister in the ".US"
- domain but this is NOT mandatory. No further state and local
- agencies will be registered under .GOV.
-
-
- Q. It is not in anyone's best interest to name things by
- organizational boundaries as these things change. Internet domain
- names and host names, once defined and used, become so widely
- distributed that they become virtually impossible to change.
- Organizational structure changes but not the underlying networking
- structure.
-
- A. The policy does not require organizations to change their names
- once established, but individual agency policies may. The DNS system
- contains some capabilities to assist in name transition - the CNAME
- record provides a capability for cross-domain aliases which can be
- used to ease a transition between one name space and another. As
- noted in the clarifications, naming and subdomain conventions WITHIN
- an agency or department DNS delegation are solely the province of
- that entity.
-
-
- Q. How can two entities have the same name registered? How does
- this apply to NIH.GOV, FDA.GOV, and CDC.GOV, all of which are large
- components of DHHS/PHS? NCIFCRF.GOV is a component of NIH. Does it
- have to change? I don't understand how a distinction is made if some
- are grandfathered and some are not.
-
- A. US-STATE.GOV and STATE.GOV for example. The problem is actually
- one entity with two names. NIH.GOV and FDA.GOV represent separate
- entities (albeit within DHHS). If there were an NIH.GOV and an NIH-
- EAST.GOV for example, NIH would have to eliminate one of them
- (probably moving NIH-EAST.GOV to EAST.NIH.GOV).
-
-
- Q. How much is the taxpayer being asked to spend to alter tens of
- thousands of existing computer and telecommunications systems to
- support RFC 1816?
-
- A. There are currently less that half-a-dozen duplicate DNS names at
- the FIPS-95-1 level which will need to be changed. Given the fact
- that this will be accomplished over the next three years, the costs
- should be minimal.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- CROSS-AGENCY COLLABORATIONS
-
- Q. An organization maintains a domain name which represents a
- cross-agency community, IC.GOV, which represents members of the
- intelligence community. As a cross-agency collaborative effort, does
- the domain have to be reregistered?
-
- A. The policy states that "Cross-agency collaborative organizations
- (e.g., "Federal Networking Council", "Information Infrastructure Task
- Force") are eligible for registration under .GOV upon presentation of
- the chartering document and are the only non-FIPS-listed
- organizations eligible for registration under .GOV." "IC.GOV"
- however, is grandfathered since it is an existing domain.
- Nevertheless, it would be appropriate to provide a copy of the
- chartering document to the FNC for the record. This would ease
- future changes to the IC.GOV domain if necessary.
-
- FUTURE .GOV REGISTRATIONS
-
- Q. Top level domains are roughly equivalent to the cabinet-level
- agencies identified in FIPS-95-1. What will happen if non-FIPS-95-1
- entities apply for the ".GOV" registration in the future?
-
- A. The Internic will use RFC 1816 as guidance and will not grant the
- ".GOV" to any new entity which is not listed in the FIPS-95-1 or
- which has not been granted an exception status by the FNC Executive
- Committee.
-
-
- Q. Suppose NIH were moved to a new Dept. of Science? Would our
- domain name have to be changed?
-
- A. NIH.GOV is grandfathered under the existing policy and would not
- change. The "Department of Science" under its own policies may
- require you to re-register though.
-
- FNC INTENT
-
- Q. It is unclear how this will policy will facilitate access by the
- public to our information, especially since most of the public
- doesn't know our organizational structure or that CDC is part of
- DHHS/PHS.
-
- A. The policy attempts to avoid confusion as an increasing number of
- entities register under the ".GOV" domain and to transfer authority
- and responsibility for domain name space to the appropriate agencies
- and away from a centralized authority. For facilitating access,
- various tools and capabilities are coming into use on the Internet
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- all the time. Most of these tools provide a fairly strong search
- capability which should obviate most concerns of finding resources
- based on domain names.
-
-
- Q. Section 1D of RFC 1816 unfairly constrains the organizations
- within the .gov domain in stark contrast to Section 1F which grants
- .mil domain organizations full freedom to operate subdomains in any
- manner chosen.
-
- A. The Federal Networking Council has jurisdiction over the ".GOV"
- domain names; ".MIL" domain names fall within the jurisdiction of the
- Department of Defense. The .MIL domain has had a written policy
- delimiting which DOD agencies get registered directly under .MIL
- since about 1987 when the DNS first started to come into use.
- Individual agencies under the .MIL domain (e.g., AF.MIL/US Air Force)
- are responsible for setting policy within their domains and for
- registrations within those domains. This is exactly equivalent to
- the .GOV domain - an individual agency (e.g., Treasury.GOV/Dept of
- Treasury) may and should set policy for subregistrations within their
- domain.
-
-
- Q. Section 1B identifies several law enforcement agencies as being
- "autonomous" for the purposes of domain registration. What is the
- selection criteria for an "autonomous law enforcement" agency? For
- instance, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is responsible for law
- enforcement as is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF).
-
- A. The selection criteria for "law enforcement agency" is based on
- primary mission. A case could be made for either or both of these
- being law enforcement agencies, although the IRS' primary mission is
- tax revenue collection and has few armed officers relative to its
- size. An "autonomous" agency is one with mission and role distinct
- and (possibly) separate from its containing department.
- Unfortunately, 95-1 does not do a good job of identifying
- "autonomous" entities. In the event of problems with registration,
- ask the registrar to get a ruling from the FNC.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 7]
-
- RFC 1816 U.S. Government Internet Domain Names August 1995
-
-
- ROUTING QUESTIONS
-
- Q. How will Domain Name Service resolution on the Net work? Instead
- of a root DNS server returning the address of cdc.gov and immediately
- directing inquires to our DNS servers, will the root server return a
- DNS pointer to DHHS, then DHHS will resolve to PHS, then a fourth DNS
- query to get to CDC? This will add unnecessary traffic to the Net.
- (example is host.CDC.PHS.DHHS.GOV)
-
- A. The answer is based on how you (personally and agency wide)
- configure your servers. First, most servers cache previous answers -
- they may have to ask once, but generally remember the answer if they
- need it again. Information directly under .GOV will be fairly long-
- lived which substantially reduces the requirement to query .GOV
- server. Secondly, multiple levels of the DNS tree MAY reside on the
- same server. In the above example the information for DHHS.GOV,
- PHS.DHHS.GOV and CDC.PHS.DHHS.GOV could all reside on the same
- server. Assuming the location of the DHHS.GOV server was not cached,
- it would require 2 queries. Further queries would cache the location
- of this server and the servers associated with the domains it serves.
- Lastly, the individual agencies may structure their domains as they
- please. CDC could reside directly under DHHS.GOV as CDC.DHHS.GOV
- subject to HHS's own policies.
-
- Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
- Author's Address
-
- Federal Networking Council
- 4001 N. Fairfax Drive
- Arlington, VA 22203
-
- Phone: (703) 522-6410
- EMail: execdir@fnc.gov
- URL: http://www.fnc.gov
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Federal Networking Council Informational [Page 8]
-
-