home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group D. Mills
- Request for Comments: 1769 University of Delaware
- Obsoletes: 1361 March 1995
- Category: Informational
-
-
- Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
- does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
- this memo is unlimited.
-
- Abstract
-
- This memorandum describes the Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP),
- which is an adaptation of the Network Time Protocol (NTP) used to
- synchronize computer clocks in the Internet. SNTP can be used when
- the ultimate performance of the full NTP implementation described in
- RFC-1305 is not needed or justified. It can operate in both unicast
- modes (point to point) and broadcast modes (point to multipoint). It
- can also operate in IP multicast mode where this service is
- available. SNTP involves no change to the current or previous NTP
- specification versions or known implementations, but rather a
- clarification of certain design features of NTP which allow operation
- in a simple, stateless remote-procedure call (RPC) mode with accuracy
- and reliability expectations similar to the UDP/TIME protocol
- described in RFC-868.
-
- This memorandum obsoletes RFC-1361 of the same title. Its purpose is
- to explain the protocol model for operation in broadcast mode, to
- provide additional clarification in some places and to correct a few
- typographical errors. A working knowledge of the NTP Version 3
- specification RFC-1305 is not required for an implementation of SNTP.
- Distribution of this memorandum is unlimited.
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- The Network Time Protocol (NTP) specified in RFC-1305 [MIL92] is used
- to synchronize computer clocks in the global Internet. It provides
- comprehensive mechanisms to access national time and frequency
- dissemination services, organize the time-synchronization subnet and
- adjust the local clock in each participating subnet peer. In most
- places of the Internet of today, NTP provides accuracies of 1-50 ms,
- depending on the characteristics of the synchronization source and
- network paths.
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- RFC-1305 specifies the NTP protocol machine in terms of events,
- states, transition functions and actions and, in addition, optional
- algorithms to improve the timekeeping quality and mitigate among
- several, possibly faulty, synchronization sources. To achieve
- accuracies in the low milliseconds over paths spanning major portions
- of the Internet of today, these intricate algorithms, or their
- functional equivalents, are necessary. However, in many cases
- accuracies of this order are not required and something less, perhaps
- in the order of large fractions of the second, is sufficient. In such
- cases simpler protocols such as the Time Protocol [POS83], have been
- used for this purpose. These protocols usually involve an RPC
- exchange where the client requests the time of day and the server
- returns it in seconds past some known reference epoch.
-
- NTP is designed for use by clients and servers with a wide range of
- capabilities and over a wide range of network delays and jitter
- characteristics. Most users of the Internet NTP synchronization
- subnet of today use a software package including the full suite of
- NTP options and algorithms, which are relatively complex, real-time
- applications. While the software has been ported to a wide variety of
- hardware platforms ranging from supercomputers to personal computers,
- its sheer size and complexity is not appropriate for many
- applications. Accordingly, it is useful to explore alternative access
- strategies using far simpler software appropriate for less stringent
- accuracy expectations.
-
- This memorandum describes the Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP),
- which is a simplified access strategy for servers and clients using
- NTP as now specified and deployed in the Internet. There are no
- changes to the protocol or implementations now running or likely to
- be implemented in the near future. The access paradigm is identical
- to the UDP/TIME Protocol and, in fact, it should be easily possible
- to adapt a UDP/TIME client implementation, say for a personal
- computer, to operate using SNTP. Moreover, SNTP is also designed to
- operate in a dedicated server configuration including an integrated
- radio clock. With careful design and control of the various latencies
- in the system, which is practical in a dedicated design, it is
- possible to deliver time accurate to the order of microseconds.
-
- It is strongly recommended that SNTP be used only at the extremities
- of the synchronization subnet. SNTP clients should operate only at
- the leaves (highest stratum) of the subnet and in configurations
- where no NTP or SNTP client is dependent on another SNTP client for
- synchronization. SNTP servers should operate only at the root
- (stratum 1) of the subnet and then only in configurations where no
- other source of synchronization other than a reliable radio clock is
- available. The full degree of reliability ordinarily expected of
- primary servers is possible only using the redundant sources, diverse
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- subnet paths and crafted algorithms of a full NTP implementation.
- This extends to the primary source of synchronization itself in the
- form of multiple radio clocks and backup paths to other primary
- servers should the radio clock fail or deliver incorrect time.
- Therefore, the use of SNTP rather than NTP in primary servers should
- be carefully considered.
-
- 2. Operating Modes and Addressing
-
- Like NTP, SNTP can operate in either unicast (point to point) or
- broadcast (point to multipoint) modes. A unicast client sends a
- request to a server and expects a reply from which it can determine
- the time and, optionally, the roundtrip delay and local clock offset
- relative to the server. A broadcast server periodically sends a
- message to a designated IP broadcast address or IP multicast group
- address and ordinarily expects no requests from clients, while a
- broadcast client listens on this address and ordinarily sends no
- requests to servers. Some broadcast servers may elect to respond to
- client requests as well as send unsolicited broadcast messages, while
- some broadcast clients may elect to send requests only in order to
- determine the network propagation delay between the server and
- client.
-
- In unicast mode the client and server IP addresses are assigned
- following the usual conventions. In broadcast mode the server uses a
- designated IP broadcast address or IP multicast group address,
- together with a designated media-access broadcast address, and the
- client listens on these addresses. For this purpose, an IP broadcast
- address has scope limited to a single IP subnet, since routers do not
- propagate IP broadcast datagrams. In the case of Ethernets, for
- example, the Ethernet media-access broadcast address (all ones) is
- used with an IP address consisting of the IP subnet number in the net
- field and all ones in the host field.
-
- On the other hand, an IP multicast group address has scope extending
- to potentially the entire Internet. The actual scope, group
- membership and routing are determined by the Internet Group
- Management Protocol (IGMP) [DEE89] and various routing protocols,
- which are beyond the scope of this document. In the case of
- Ethernets, for example, the Ethernet media-access broadcast address
- (all ones) is used with the assigned IP multicast group address of
- 224.0.1.1. Other than the IP addressing conventions and IGMP, there
- is no difference in server operations with either the IP broadcast
- address or IP multicast group address.
-
- Broadcast clients listen on the designated media-access broadcast
- address, such as all ones in the case of Ethernets. In the case of IP
- broadcast addresses, no further provisions are necessary. In the case
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- of IP multicast group addresses, the host may need to implement IGMP
- in order that the local router intercepts messages to the 224.0.1.1
- multicast group. These considerations are beyond the scope of this
- document.
-
- In the case of SNTP as specified herein, there is a very real
- vulnerability that SNTP multicast clients can be disrupted by
- misbehaving or hostile SNTP or NTP multicast servers elsewhere in the
- Internet, since at present all such servers use the same IP multicast
- group address 224.0.1.1. Where necessary, access control based on the
- server source address can be used to select only those servers known
- to and trusted by the client. Alternatively, by convention and
- informal agreement, all NTP multicast servers now include an MD5-
- encrypted message digest in every message, so that clients can
- determine if the message is authentic and not modified in transit. It
- is in principle possible that SNTP clients could implement the
- necessary encryption and key-distribution schemes, but this is
- considered not likely in the simple systems for which SNTP is
- intended.
-
- While not integral to the SNTP specification, it is intended that IP
- broadcast addresses will be used primarily in IP subnets and LAN
- segments including a fully functional NTP server with a number of
- SNTP clients in the same subnet, while IP multicast group addresses
- will be used only in special cases engineered for the purpose. In
- particular, IP multicast group addresses should be used in SNTP
- servers only if the server implements the NTP authentication scheme
- described in RFC-1305, including support for the MD5 message-digest
- algorithm.
-
- 3. NTP Timestamp Format
-
- SNTP uses the standard NTP timestamp format described in RFC-1305 and
- previous versions of that document. In conformance with standard
- Internet practice, NTP data are specified as integer or fixed-point
- quantities, with bits numbered in big-endian fashion from 0 starting
- at the left, or high-order, position. Unless specified otherwise, all
- quantities are unsigned and may occupy the full field width with an
- implied 0 preceding bit 0.
-
- Since NTP timestamps are cherished data and, in fact, represent the
- main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has been
- established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsigned
- fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 1900. The
- integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the
- last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low-order
- bits should be set to 0. This format allows convenient multiple-
- precision arithmetic and conversion to UDP/TIME representation
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- (seconds), but does complicate the conversion to ICMP Timestamp
- message representation (milliseconds). The precision of this
- representation is about 200 picoseconds, which should be adequate for
- even the most exotic requirements.
-
- 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Seconds |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Seconds Fraction (0-padded) |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Note that, since some time in 1968 the most significant bit (bit 0 of
- the integer part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will
- overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2036,
- some external means will be necessary to qualify time relative to
- 1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 years).
- Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so precious
- that appropriate means should be readily available. There will exist
- a 200-picosecond interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when
- the 64-bit field will be 0, which by convention is interpreted as an
- invalid or unavailable timestamp.
-
- 4. NTP Message Format
-
- Both NTP and SNTP are clients of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
- [POS80], which itself is a client of the Internet Protocol (IP)
- [DAR81]. The structure of the IP and UDP headers is described in the
- cited specification documents and will not be described further here.
- The UDP port number assigned to NTP is 123, which should be used in
- both the Source Port and Destination Port fields in the UDP header.
- The remaining UDP header fields should be set as described in the
- specification.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Following is a description of the SNTP message format, which follows
- the IP and UDP headers. The SNTP message format is identical to the
- NTP format described in RFC-1305, with the exception that some of the
- data fields are "canned," that is, initialized to pre-specified
- values. The format of the NTP message is shown below.
-
- 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |LI | VN |Mode | Stratum | Poll | Precision |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Root Delay |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Root Dispersion |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reference Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- | Reference Timestamp (64) |
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- | Originate Timestamp (64) |
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- | Receive Timestamp (64) |
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- | Transmit Timestamp (64) |
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- | |
- | Authenticator (optional) (96) |
- | |
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- As described in the next section, in SNTP most of these fields are
- initialized with pre-specified data. For completeness, the function
- of each field is briefly summarized below.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Leap Indicator (LI): This is a two-bit code warning of an impending
- leap second to be inserted/deleted in the last minute of the current
- day, with bit 0 and bit 1, respectively, coded as follows:
-
- LI Value Meaning
- -------------------------------------------------------
- 00 0 no warning
- 01 1 last minute has 61 seconds
- 10 2 last minute has 59 seconds)
- 11 3 alarm condition (clock not synchronized)
-
- Version Number (VN): This is a three-bit integer indicating the NTP
- version number, currently 3.
-
- Mode: This is a three-bit integer indicating the mode, with values
- defined as follows:
-
- Mode Meaning
- ------------------------------------
- 0 reserved
- 1 symmetric active
- 2 symmetric passive
- 3 client
- 4 server
- 5 broadcast
- 6 reserved for NTP control message
- 7 reserved for private use
-
- In unicast mode the client sets this field to 3 (client) in the
- request and the server sets it to 4 (server) in the reply. In
- broadcast mode the server sets this field to 5 (broadcast).
-
- Stratum: This is a eight-bit unsigned integer indicating the stratum
- level of the local clock, with values defined as follows:
-
- Stratum Meaning
- ----------------------------------------------
- 0 unspecified or unavailable
- 1 primary reference (e.g., radio clock)
- 2-15 secondary reference (via NTP or SNTP)
- 16-255 reserved
-
- Poll Interval: This is an eight-bit signed integer indicating the
- maximum interval between successive messages, in seconds to the
- nearest power of two. The values that can appear in this field
- presently range from 4 (16 s) to 14 (16284 s); however, most
- applications use only the sub-range 6 (64 s) to 10 (1024 s).
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 7]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Precision: This is an eight-bit signed integer indicating the
- precision of the local clock, in seconds to the nearest power of two.
- The values that normally appear in this field range from -6 for
- mains-frequency clocks to -20 for microsecond clocks found in some
- workstations.
-
- Root Delay: This is a 32-bit signed fixed-point number indicating the
- total roundtrip delay to the primary reference source, in seconds
- with fraction point between bits 15 and 16. Note that this variable
- can take on both positive and negative values, depending on the
- relative time and frequency offsets. The values that normally appear
- in this field range from negative values of a few milliseconds to
- positive values of several hundred milliseconds.
-
- Root Dispersion: This is a 32-bit unsigned fixed-point number
- indicating the nominal error relative to the primary reference
- source, in seconds with fraction point between bits 15 and 16. The
- values that normally appear in this field range from 0 to several
- hundred milliseconds.
-
- Reference Clock Identifier: This is a 32-bit code identifying the
- particular reference source. In the case of stratum 0 (unspecified)
- or stratum 1 (primary reference), this is a four-octet, left-
- justified, 0-padded ASCII string. While not enumerated as part of the
- NTP specification, the following are representative ASCII
- identifiers:
-
- Stratum Code Meaning
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
- 1 pps precision calibrated source, such as ATOM (atomic
- clock), PPS (precision pulse-per-second source),
- etc.
- 1 service generic time service other than NTP, such as ACTS
- (Automated Computer Time Service), TIME (UDP/Time
- Protocol), TSP (Unix Time Service Protocol), DTSS
- (Digital Time Synchronization Service), etc.
- 1 radio Generic radio service, with callsigns such as CHU,
- DCF77, MSF, TDF, WWV, WWVB, WWVH, etc.
- 1 nav radionavigation system, such as OMEG (OMEGA), LORC
- (LORAN-C), etc.
- 1 satellite generic satellite service, such as GOES
- (Geostationary Orbit Environment Satellite, GPS
- (Global Positioning Service), etc.
- 2 address secondary reference (four-octet Internet address of
- the NTP server)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 8]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Reference Timestamp: This is the time at which the local clock was
- last set or corrected, in 64-bit timestamp format.
-
- Originate Timestamp: This is the time at which the request departed
- the client for the server, in 64-bit timestamp format.
-
- Receive Timestamp: This is the time at which the request arrived at
- the server, in 64-bit timestamp format.
-
- Transmit Timestamp: This is the time at which the reply departed the
- server for the client, in 64-bit timestamp format.
-
- Authenticator (optional): When the NTP authentication mechanism is
- implemented, this contains the authenticator information defined in
- Appendix C of RFC-1305. In SNTP this field is ignored for incoming
- messages and is not generated for outgoing messages.
-
- 5. SNTP Client Operations
-
- The model for n SNTP client operating with either a NTP or SNTP
- server is a RPC client with no persistent state. In unicast mode, the
- client sends a client request (mode 3) to the server and expects a
- server reply (mode 4). In broadcast mode, the client sends no request
- and waits for a broadcast message (mode 5) from one or more servers,
- depending on configuration. Unicast client and broadcast server
- messages are normally sent at periods from 64 s to 1024 s, depending
- on the client and server configurations.
-
- A unicast client initializes the SNTP message header, sends the
- message to the server and strips the time of day from the reply. For
- this purpose all of the message-header fields shown above are set to
- 0, except the first octet. In this octet the LI field is set to 0 (no
- warning) and the Mode field is set to 3 (client). The VN field must
- agree with the software version of the NTP or SNTP server; however,
- NTP Version 3 (RFC-1305) servers will also accept Version 2 (RFC-
- 1119) and Version 1 (RFC-1059) messages, while NTP Version 2 servers
- will also accept NTP Version 1 messages. Version 0 (RFC-959) messages
- are no longer supported. Since there are NTP servers of all three
- versions interoperating in the Internet of today, it is recommended
- that the VN field be set to 1.
-
- In both unicast and broadcast modes, the unicast server reply or
- broadcast message includes all the fields described above; however,
- in SNTP only the Transmit Timestamp has explicit meaning and then
- only if nonzero. The integer part of this field contains the server
- time of day in the same format as the UDP/TIME Protocol [POS83].
- While the fraction part of this field will usually be valid, the
- accuracy achieved with SNTP may justify its use only to a significant
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 9]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- fraction of a second. If the Transmit Timestamp field is 0, the
- message should be disregarded.
-
- In broadcast mode, a client has no additional information to
- calculate the propagation delay between the server and client, as the
- Transmit Timestamp and Receive Timestamp fields have no meaning in
- this mode. Even in unicast mode, most clients will probably elect to
- ignore the Originate Timestamp and Receive Timestamp fields anyway.
- However, in unicast mode a simple calculation can be used to provide
- the roundtrip delay d and local clock offset t relative to the
- server, generally to within a few tens of milliseconds. To do this,
- the client sets the Originate Timestamp in the request to the time of
- day according to its local clock converted to NTP timestamp format.
- When the reply is received, the client determines a Destination
- Timestamp as the time of arrival according to its local clock
- converted to NTP timestamp format. The following table summarizes the
- four timestamps.
-
- Timestamp Name ID When Generated
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- Originate Timestamp T1 time request sent by client
- Receive Timestamp T2 time request received at server
- Transmit Timestamp T3 time reply sent by server
- Destination Timestamp T4 time reply received at client
-
- The roundtrip delay d and local clock offset t are defined as
-
- d = (T4 - T1) - (T2 - T3)
- t = ((T2 - T1) + (T3 - T4)) / 2.
-
- The following table is a summary of the SNTP client operations. There
- are two recommended error checks shown in the table. In all NTP
- versions, if the LI field is 3, or the Stratum field is not in the
- range 1-15, or the Transmit Timestamp is 0, the server has never
- synchronized or not synchronized to a valid timing source within the
- last 24 hours. At the client discretion, the values of the remaining
- fields can be checked as well. Whether to believe the transmit
- timestamp or not in case one or more of these fields appears invalid
- is at the discretion of the implementation.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 10]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Field Name Request Reply
- -------------------------------------------------------------
- LI 0 leap indicator; if 3
- (unsynchronized), disregard
- message
- VN 1 (see text) ignore
- Mode 3 (client) ignore
- Stratum 0 ignore
- Poll 0 ignore
- Precision 0 ignore
- Root Delay 0 ignore
- Root Dispersion 0 ignore
- Reference Identifier 0 ignore
- Reference Timestamp 0 ignore
- Originate Timestamp 0 (see text) ignore (see text)
- Receive Timestamp 0 ignore (see text)
- Transmit Timestamp 0 time of day; if 0
- (unsynchronized), disregard
- message
- Authenticator (not used) ignore
-
- 6. SNTP Server Operations
-
- The model for a SNTP server operating with either a NTP or SNTP
- client is an RPC server with no persistent state. Since a SNTP server
- ordinarily does not implement the full set of NTP algorithms intended
- to support redundant peers and diverse network paths, it is
- recommended that a SNTP server be operated only in conjunction with a
- source of external synchronization, such as a reliable radio clock.
- In this case the server always operates at stratum 1.
-
- A server can operate in unicast mode, broadcast mode or both at the
- same time. In unicast mode the server receives a request message,
- modifies certain fields in the NTP or SNTP header, and returns the
- message to the sender, possibly using the same message buffer as the
- request. The server may or may not respond if not synchronized to a
- correctly operating radio clock, but the preferred option is to
- respond, since this allows reachability to be determined regardless
- of synchronization state. In unicast mode, the VN and Poll fields of
- the request are copied intact to the reply. If the Mode field of the
- request is 3 (client), it is set to 4 (server) in the reply;
- otherwise, this field is set to 2 (symmetric passive) in order to
- conform to the NTP specification.
-
- In broadcast mode, the server sends messages only if synchronized to
- a correctly operating reference clock. In this mode, the VN field is
- set to 3 (for the current SNTP version), and the Mode field to 5
- (broadcast). The Poll field is set to the server poll interval, in
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 11]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- seconds to the nearest power of two. It is highly desirable that, if
- a server supports broadcast mode, it also supports unicast mode. This
- is necessary so a potential broadcast client can calculate the
- propagation delay using client/server messages prior to regular
- operation using only broadcast messages.
-
- The remaining fields are set in the same way in both unicast and
- broadcast modes. Assuming the server is synchronized to a radio clock
- or other primary reference source and operating correctly, the
- Stratum field is set to 1 (primary server) and the LI field is set to
- 0; if not, the Stratum field is set to 0 and the LI field is set to
- 3. The Precision field is set to reflect the maximum reading error of
- the local clock. For all practical cases it is computed as the
- negative of the number of significant bits to the right of the
- decimal point in the NTP timestamp format. The Root Delay and Root
- Dispersion fields are set to 0 for a primary server; optionally, the
- Root Dispersion field can be set to a value corresponding to the
- maximum expected error of the radio clock itself. The Reference
- Identifier is set to designate the primary reference source, as
- indicated in the table above.
-
- The timestamp fields are set as follows. If the server is
- unsynchronized or first coming up, all timestamp fields are set to
- zero. If synchronized, the Reference Timestamp is set to the time the
- last update was received from the radio clock or, if unavailable, to
- the time of day when the message is sent. The Receive Timestamp and
- Transmit Timestamp fields are set to the time of day when the message
- is sent. In unicast mode, the Originate Timestamp field is copied
- unchanged from the Transmit Timestamp field of the request. It is
- important that this field be copied intact, as a NTP client uses it
- to check for replays. In broadcast mode, this field is set to the
- time of day when the message is sent. The following table summarizes
- these actions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 12]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Field Name Request Reply
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- LI ignore 0 (normal), 3
- (unsynchronized)
- VN 1, 2 or 3 3 or copied from request
- Mode 3 (see text) 2, 4 or 5 (see text)
- Stratum ignore 1 server stratum
- Poll ignore copied from request
- Precision ignore server precision
- Root Delay ignore 0
- Root Dispersion ignore 0 (see text)
- Reference Identifier ignore source identifier
- Reference Timestamp ignore 0 or time of day
- Originate Timestamp ignore 0 or time of day or copied
- from Transmit Timestamp of
- request
- Receive Timestamp ignore 0 or time of day
- Transmit Timestamp (see text) 0 or time of day
- Authenticator ignore (not used)
-
- There is some latitude on the part of most clients to forgive invalid
- timestamps, such as might occur when first coming up or during
- periods when the primary reference source is inoperative. The most
- important indicator of an unhealthy server is the LI field, in which
- a value of 3 indicates an unsynchronized condition. When this value
- is displayed, clients should discard the server message, regardless
- of the contents of other fields.
-
- 7. References
-
- [DAR81] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program
- Protocol Specification", STD 5, RFC 791, DARPA, September 1981.
-
- [DEE89] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting. STD 5,
- RFC 1112, Stanford University, August 1989.
-
- [MIL92] Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification,
- Implementation and Analysis. RFC 1305, University of Delaware,
- March 1992.
-
- [POS80] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
- USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
-
- [POS83] Postel, J., and K. Harrenstien, "Time Protocol", STD 26,
- RFC 868, USC/Information Sciences Institute, SRI, May 1983.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 13]
-
- RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
-
-
- Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
- Author's Address
-
- David L. Mills
- Electrical Engineering Department
- University of Delaware
- Newark, DE 19716
-
- Phone: (302) 831-8247
- EMail: mills@udel.edu
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Mills [Page 14]
-
-