home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 2003-06-11 | 39.3 KB | 1,124 lines |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group T. Johannsen
- Request for Comments: 1608 Dresden University
- Category: Experimental G. Mansfield
- AIC Systems Laboratory
- M. Kosters
- Network Solutions,Inc.
- S. Sataluri
- AT&T Bell Laboratories
- March 1994
-
-
- Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
- community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any
- kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
- Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
-
- Abstract
-
- This document describes the objects necessary to include information
- about IP networks and IP numbers in the X.500 Directory. It extends
- the work "Charting networks in the X.500 Directory" [1] where a
- general framework is presented for representing networks in the
- Directory by applying it to IP networks. This application of the
- Directory is intended to support the work of IP network assigning
- authorities, NICs, as well as other applications looking for a
- mapping of IP numbers to data of related networks. Furthermore,
- Autonomous Systems and related routing policy information can be
- represented in the Directory along with their relationship to
- networks and organizations.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
- 1. Introduction 2
- 2. IP images of networks 3
- 2.1 IP network image 3
- 2.2 IP node image 5
- 2.3 IP network interface image 6
- 2.4 Autonomous Systems 7
- 3. Number assignment information 7
- 3.1 Delegated Block object 8
- 3.2 IP Group object 9
- 3.3 IP Reference object 10
- 3.4 AS Block object 10
- 3.5 AS Reference object 10
- 4. Directory tree 11
- 4.1 IP image objects 11
- 4.2 AS objects 11
- 4.3 Namespace objects 11
- 4.4 Relationship to organizational entries 13
- 5. Security Considerations 14
- 6. Authors' Addresses 15
- References 16
- Appendix: OID tables 17
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- Information related to the Internet Network Infrastructure is created
- and stored by a number of different organizations, such as the
- Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), Internet Registry (IR),
- Network Information Centers (NICs), and the NSFNET Network Operations
- Center (NOC). This information is generally "mastered" (stored and
- maintained) by these organizations on a centralized basis, i.e.,
- there is a single place to look for a definitive list of entries for
- these categories. This has worked well in the past but given the
- tremendous growth of the Internet and its number of users and
- networks, it is essential that a distributed schema be used.
-
- The X.500 Directory offers the appropriate technology for
- implementing this distributed method of managing network
- infrastructure information.
-
- The following goals are addressed in this document:
-
- o Provision of IP specific images of network elements
- o Mapping from Network Number to network, owner, provider etc.
- o Support of delegation of IP address blocks
- o Storage of high-level routing policies and AS information
- o Support of "classless" network address formats
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- o Provision of several organizational images of a network
-
- It may be noted that the document basically consists of two parts.
- In the first part, an IP specific extension of the general framework
- "Charting networks in the Directory" [1] is given. Objects defined
- by the application of this framework are related to IP numbers. An IP
- namespace is defined in the second part of this paper, referring to
- IP network elements defined at the beginning.
-
- 2. IP images of networks
-
- As defined in [1], networks are modeled as a set of subnetworks and
- nodes, called network elements in the remainder. To obtain a
- particular view of a network element, images were introduced. Below,
- images of network elements for an IP specific view are defined.
- Please note that images contain references to underlying physical
- information about elements.
-
- In the remainder, ipStringSyntax is used as attribute type for all
- attributes that are to hold an IP number. Currently, there are two
- definitions for a syntax like this:
-
- o IpAddress as of [5]
- o ip as of [6]
-
- It is suggested to use CaseIgnoreStringSyntax for implementations for
- the time being with the convention to use the ordinary IP syntax.
- Nevertheless, an OID has been reserved for ipStringSyntax (see
- Appendix).
-
- 2.1 IP network image
-
- IP network image is one application of network images and therefore
- inherits the networkImageClass. This class is given below for
- reference only, its definition can be found in [1].
-
- networkImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of ImageCommunicationObject
- MAY CONTAIN
- externalGateway :: distinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* points to one or more nodes that act
- as gateway for the protocol application
- this image refers to */
-
- An IP network combines all network elements that have a common IP
- network number. Presently, IP network numbers fall into one of the
- classes A, B, or C. However, sub- and supernetworking is already done
- broadly, and classless networks numbers are expected to be assigned
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- soon. [2] proposes to assign bitwise contiguous blocks of class-C-
- addresses to all networks with more than 255 nodes. The definition of
- IP network, therefore, is always related to common network number and
- network mask.
-
- IP networks have a very close relationship to the Domain Name System.
- Several attributes are introduced to take care of these relations.
- Though we do not intend to abolish the existing DNS service, the
- schema defined here is able to provide the mapping IP number to
- domain name and vice versa.
-
- An IP network image object as defined below is intended to provide
- technical and administrative data for one IP network. Attributes hold
- information that a NIC-WHOIS server would reveal for the network, and
- more.
-
- ipNetworkImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of NetworkImage
- MUST CONTAIN
- ipNetworkImageName :: CaseIgnoreString,
- /* common name */
- ipNwNumber :: IPStringSyntax,
- /* the IP network number for
- this (sub)network */
- ipNwMask :: IPStringSyntax
- /* mask that applies to ipNwNumber
- in order to define classless
- network number; also used for routing */
-
- MAY CONTAIN
- /* DNS related info ; e.g. - */
- associatedDomain :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* the domain name associated to this IP network;
- As there is not always a 1:1 mapping between traditional
- IP numbers and domain names, the name given here
- should contain the "closest match".
- 1) (sub)network does not have a domain name
- of its own, but is part of a bigger domain:
- take name of that domain
- 2) network is divided into several domains,
- therefore having more than one domain name:
- list all of them.
- Note: a reverse mapping of domain names to
- networks/nodes can be achieved by a modified
- implementation of RFC1279 */
- inAddrServer :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* refers to the ipNodeImageObject of the
- inaddr Server that holds information about
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- this network */
- /* routing policy; e.g. - */
- asNumber :: integerStringSyntax,
- /* number of Autonomous System this network belongs to */
- acceptedUsagePolicy :: caseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* semantics to be defined */
- /* Any other - */
- provider :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* points to network provider */
- onlineDate :: uTCTimeSyntax
- /* date when network got connected to the Internet */
-
- 2.2 IP node image
-
- If a node in the network is running the IP protocol, an
- ipNodeImageObject should be created for this node. This image is a
- subclass of nodeImageClass and holds IP specific information. The
- nodeImageClass is given below for reference only, its definition can
- be found in [1].
-
- nodeImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of ImageCommunicationObject
- /* no attributes common for all nodeImages have been
- defined yet */
-
- An ipNodeImage is used to obtain technical and administrative
- information on a host. The object is defined as follows:
-
- ipNodeImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of NodeImage
- MUST CONTAIN
- ipNodeName :: CaseIgnoreString
- /* common name, it is advised to use
- the hostname for this purpose */
- MAY CONTAIN
- protocol :: CaseIgnoreString,
- /* name and version of IP protocol running */
- domainName :: CaseIgnoreString,
- /* the complete domain name of this node;
- CNAMEs can be stored additionally to the
- DNS A record name;
- further relationships, like MX record entries,
- should be taken care of by the domain name tree
- according to RFC 1279 */
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- 2.3 IP network interface image
-
- The most important IP related information of a node (its IP
- addresses) is registered with ipNetworkInterfaceImageObjects. This
- picture is accurate as a node can have several IP addresses, but at
- most one per interface. Furthermore, it shows clearly the
- relationship between interface and neighboring IP network.
-
- IpNetworkInterfaceImage is a subclass of networkInterfaceImageClass.
- The networkInterfaceImageClass is given below for reference only, its
- definition can be found in [1]. Note that for
- ipNetworkInterfaceImage all references are drawn in the context of
- IP, i.e., networkInterfaceAddress becomes an IP address and
- connectedNetwork points to an ipNetworkImageObject.
-
- networkInterfaceImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of ImageCommunicationObject
- MAY CONTAIN
- networkInterfaceAddress :: caseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* this interface's address in the context the
- image refers to, e.g. IP number, NSAP */
- connectedNetwork :: distinguishedNameSyntax
- /* pointer to networkImageObject that describes
- the network this interface is attached to in terms
- of the protocol or application the images
- indicates */
-
- Additionally, ipNetworkInterfaceImageObject has the following
- properties:
-
- ipNetworkInterfaceImage OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of NetworkInterfaceImage
- MUST CONTAIN
- ipNetworkInterfaceName :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax
- /* It is suggested that the interface name
- is derived from the name of the logical
- device this interface represents for the
- operating system, e.g. le0, COM1 */
- MAY CONTAIN
- ipNwMask :: IPStringSyntax
- /* mask that applies to networkInterfaceAddress for
- routing of packets to nodes on the connected
- (broadcast) network;
- Note: This is only a fraction
- of the routing table information
- for this interface, namely for one hop. */
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- 2.4 Autonomous Systems
-
- Autonomous Systems (AS) are defined in asObject which is a subclass of
- imageCommunicationObject. It provides technical and administrative
- information of an AS. Furthermore, routing policies can be stored with
- the AS object. The definition of the AS object is aligned with the
- corresponding database object defined in [3].
-
- as OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of ImageCommunicationObject
- MUST CONTAIN
- asNumber :: IntegerStringSyntax
-
- MAY CONTAIN
- asName :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* if there is a name different from AS */
- asIn :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* accepted routes from other AS */
- /* for syntax and semantics refer [3] */
- asOut :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* generated routes announced to others */
- /* for syntax and semantics refer [3] */
- asDefault ::CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* how default routing is handled */
- /* for syntax and semantics refer [3] */
- asGuardian :: DistinguishedNameSyntax, */
- /* DN of guardian of this AS */
- lastModifiedDate :: UTCtimeSyntax */
- /* important as routes change frequently */
-
- Note that routing policies for an Autonomous System are represented
- by the {asIn, asOut} attributes of asObject. Due to performance
- constraints of present X.500 technology, it will probably not be used
- directly by routers for dynamic routing. However, it certainly can
- be used in network management systems to determine the allowed paths
- [i.e., in accordance with published policies] between two networks.
- This will be useful in finding alternate paths, and evaluating the
- connectivity of networks.
-
- 3. Number assignment information
-
- In the following, Directory objects have been defined to represent IP
- and AS (Autonomous System) namespace in the Directory. Their purpose
- is to provide
-
- o mapping from IP number to IP network element (network or node)
- o mapping from IP number to AS number and vice versa
- o assignment and delegation information
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 7]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- The need for a global, distributed database supporting the objectives
- arises mainly from distributed IP- and AS-number assignment.
-
- Describing all IP numbers with one of the new objects delegatedBlock,
- ipGroup and ipReference leads to the desired information. AS number
- information is stored with the objects asBlock and asReference.
- Furthermore, all assigned numbers have some properties in common.
- Therefore, an objectclass assignedNumberClass is introduced. This
- class exports attributes to delegatedBlock, ipGroup, ipReference,
- asBlock, and asReference.
-
- AssignedNumberClass is defined as follows ("number" always refers to
- IP number of delegatedBlock, network, host, and AS number, resp.):
-
- assignedNumberClass OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of top
- MAY CONTAIN
- assBy :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* refers to an organization or organizationalRole
- that assigned the number to assTo (see below) */
- assTo :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* refers to organization or organizationalRole
- that the number was assigned to. This does not
- imply that assTo "owns" this number now. */
- assDate :: uTCTimeSyntax,
- /* date of assignment for this number */
- nicHandle :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- /* gives the unique ID for a description
- related to this number.
- format: "handle : nic-domain-name"
- example: MAK21 : rs.internic.net */
- relNwElement :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
- /* the network element related to this number
- (network or node) */
-
- 3.1 Delegated Block object
-
- This object provides information on a block of IP addresses delegated
- to some local-authority or service provider. Only contiguous blocks
- can be represented with the following schema. If an organization
- (say, a NIC) has been assigned several IP network numbers which do
- not form a contiguous block, it might want to use a different form of
- representing that fact (e.g., using imageNetworks). The
- delegatedBlock object holds lower and upper bounds of the block.
-
- Note that the above does not make any assumption about the network
- masks being constrained by byte boundaries. We can thus represent
- subnetting within a "network (number)" that often happens within an
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 8]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- organization in the same framework.
-
- This schema does lead to some granularity in the otherwise flat IP-
- number space. Further, the granularity is significant as it may be
- used to identify the administrator of the block - a service provider
- or a domain manager. E.g., it fits well into the schema of
- aggregating networks for routing purposes as has been proposed in
- [4].
-
- The object delegatedBlock is of the form:
-
- delegatedBlock OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of AssignedNumberClass
- MUST CONTAIN
- delegatedBlockName :: caseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- lowerBound :: IPStringSyntax,
- /* smallest IP address belonging to the
- block, e.g. 195.100.0.0 */
- upperBound :: IPStringSyntax
- /* highest IP address belonging to the
- block, e.g. 195.103.255.255 */
-
- The attribute relNwElement (inherited from AssignedNumberClass) can
- point to a networkImage covering all networks within the block if
- this makes sense.
-
- 3.2 IP Group object
-
- This object provides information for an IP network number. Its
- purpose is basically only to
-
- o show that the number has been assigned, and
- o provide a reference to the descriptive ipNetworkObject for
- this network.
-
- Regardless of the actual value of x, IP group objects may exist for
- IP numbers x.0.0.0, x.y.0.0 and x.y.z.0. This approach includes
- "classical" class-A, -B and -C network addresses as well as any kind
- of super- and subnetworking.
-
- The IP group object is a subclass of assignedNumberClass. The
- attribute relNwElement points to an ipNetworkImage as defined above.
-
- ipGroup OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of AssignedNumberClass
- MUST CONTAIN
- ipGroupName :: IPStringSyntax,
- /* IP number; x.0.0.0 or x.y.0.0 or x.y.z.0
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 9]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- where x, y, z in 1..255 */
- ipNwMask :: IPStringSyntax
- /* mask that applies to all numbers
- within the group; used to define
- classless networking; */
-
- 3.3 IP Reference object
-
- There is one IP reference object for each IP host address. The
- purpose of this object is to
-
- o tell that this IP number is already assigned to a node
- o give a pointer to the related ipNodeImageObject
-
- The IP reference object is a subclass of assignedNumberClass. The
- attribute relNwElement points to an ipNodeImage.
-
- ipReference OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of AssignedNumberClass
- MUST CONTAIN
- ipReferenceName :: IPString
- /* value is always IP address */
-
- 3.4 AS block object
-
- The AS block object is used to show delegation of blocks of AS
- numbers to regional registries. This is similar to delegatedBlock of
- ipNetwork numbers.
-
- asBlock OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of AssignedNumberClass
- MUST CONTAIN
- asBlockName :: caseIgnoreStringSyntax,
- asLowerBound :: integerStringSyntax,
- asUpperBound :: integerStringSyntax
-
- An AS block will comprise several consecutive AS numbers. Objects to
- describe these numbers may be stored in asObjects.
-
- 3.5 AS reference object
-
- An AS reference object is used to show that an Autonomous System
- number has been assigned (and thus can not be given to somebody
- else). Similar to ipGroup, asReference does not contain technical
- details about an autonomous system itself but rather points (with
- relNwElement) to a descriptive asObject.
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 10]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- asReference OBJECT CLASS
- SUBCLASS of AssignedNumberClass
- MUST CONTAIN
- asNumber :: integerStringSyntax
-
- 4. Directory tree
-
-
- root
- |
- +-------------+---------------+
- | |
- c= o=Internet
- | |
- +-----+------+ +------+-------+
- | | | |
- ipNw= as= dbl= asB=
- | | |
- ipNd= ipG= asRef=
- | |
- ipNwIf= ipRef=
-
- Figure 1: Overall relationship of objects.
-
- 4.1 IP image objects
-
- According to [1], IP image entries will be stored underneath the
- organization / organizationalUnit entry of the entity responsible for
- that network. The case that such an entry does not yet exist in the
- white-pages pilot is discussed in 4.4 below.
-
- 4.2 AS objects
-
- The technical and administrative description of an AS is basically
- maintained by NICs, network providers, or other special
- organizations. It is suggested that these organizations build a
- subtree for information on AS which they are responsible for.
-
- 4.3 Namespace objects
-
- The new IP namespace objects build a single tree in the Directory. It
- is suggested that this tree will have a root of type
- organizationalUnit within @o=Internet@ou=Network Information.
-
- objectClass= organizationalUnit
- organizationalUnitName= IP networks
- description= root of IP number tree
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 11]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- The tree is built under an administrative and an implementational
- view. Nowadays, network numbers usually are assigned to
- organizations by (national) Network Information Centers (NIC) which
- themselves have got a block of IP network numbers assigned from
- another authority (e.g., IR at top level). This concept of delegated
- blocks falling apart in smaller delegated blocks and IP network
- numbers is used to model the Directory tree. Thus, an ipGroup object
- is always subordinate of a delegated block object (namely the
- delegated block including this IP number). Network numbers that were
- directly assigned by a top-level authority, i.e., have not been
- object of a delegation to a local assigning authority, will all be at
- one level in the Directory. Already today, however, we find many
- delegations within the traditional class A-, B- and C-addresses.
- Such a delegation is represented by a delegated block object, having
- the assigned IP network numbers as subordinates. Also, part of the
- block can be further delegated to another authority, leading to
- another delegated block object within the parent delegated block's
- tree. Usually, subordinates of ipGroup objects are ipReferences,
- i.e., single IP addresses as assigned to nodes. To support
- subnetworking, it is also allowed to divide ipGroups into several
- subnetwork ipGroups, each representing an IP subnetwork. In such
- cases, subnetwork numbers are given as subordinates to the assigned
- IP network number. Network masks clarify what the subnetwork
- addresses are.
-
- ou=IP networks
- |
- +-------------------+-----------------------+
- / | \
- dbl=150.0.0.0-150.100.0.0
- |
- +-------------------+-----------------------+
- / | \
- ipG=150.80.0.0
- |
- +-------------------+-----------------------+
- / | \
- ipG=150.80.240.0
- |
- +-------------------+-----------------------+
- / | \
- ipRef=150.80.254.1 ipRef=150.80.254.2 ipRef=150.80.254.3
-
- Figure 2: Example population of IP namespace tree according
- to delegation and subnetworking.
-
- For some applications, the separation of ipImage (description of the
- network) and ipGroup (description of the namespace element) will bear
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 12]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- disadvantages in the look-up procedure. In that case one might think
- of combining both object classes with the aim to provide one object
- describing administrative and technical data for an IP network.
-
- As Autonomous Systems are an additional namespace to the existing IP
- number space, they should go into a separate subtree. It is suggested
- that this is an organizationalUnit within @o=Internet@ou=Network
- Information.
-
- objectClass= organizationalUnit
- organizationalUnitName= AS numbers
- description= root of Autonomous System number space
-
- Similar to blocks of IP network numbers, blocks of AS numbers are
- sometimes delegated to another registry. This is expressed by asBlock
- objects. These objects come below the root of the AS number space.
- All AS numbers falling into such a block are stored as subordinates
- of the block. An AS block may have smaller AS blocks underneath if
- delegation is extended.
-
- 4.4 Relationship to organizational entries
-
- Organizational information (i.e., white-pages-like information about
- an organization, its departments and employees) occurs at several
- places in the network DIT - [org of IP-Number, org of AS-Number, org
- of Admin- contact, However, it will be basically mastered
- [administered, maintained] by the organization itself in the
- Directory Management Domain (DMD) over which the organization has the
- authority. This gives rise to some tricky problems - a typical
- example is that of a NIC which holds the AS, DNS, IP, ... subtrees
- of the DIT.
-
- A good strategy would avoid explicit duplication of information. By
- explicit duplication of information we understand information being
- duplicated outside the directory framework, e.g., by having several
- master entries for one and the same piece of information. The only
- way to avoid duplication would be to have relevant entries point to
- the pertinent organizational entry for organizational information.
- But since
-
- o most organizations do not, as yet, have an entry in the DIT and
- o the reliability of the access to an organizations DIT when
- stored in a remote DSA cannot be taken for granted,
-
- the following framework is adopted to accommodate the conflicting
- requirements /conditions.
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 13]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- o A copy of all the necessary organization-info is retained
- at the NICs DSA. Since only the necessary info will be kept
- the NIC will not be burdened to act as the repository of the
- organizations DIT. These objects may be kept in a separate
- subtree of affiliated-organizations [organizations
- affiliated to the NIC]. Though the affiliated organizations node
- does not really represent a locality, it is suggested to define
- the node as objectClass locality. This does not break the
- Directory schema when entries of organizations shall become
- subordinate to the NICs organization's entry.
-
- o The problem of information duplication/consistency will arise when
- organizational DITs/DSAs do come into existence. At that stage a
- shadowing mechanism which will attempt to maintain the data
- consistency may be resorted to. The X.500/ISO 9594(1993)
- implementations are expected to provide appropriate shadowing
- mechanisms along X.525.
-
- It may be noted that what is suggested is not a duplication of an
- entire white-pages-like structure at the NIC. It suggests an
- "affiliated organizations node". The entries under this node will be
- organization objects with a limited number of attributes, i.e., the
- attributes to hold the organization info necessary for the NIC:
- nothing more, nothing less. Operationally, and content wise the NIC
- DSA will hold exactly the amount of info that is desired by the NIC.
- When an organization sets up its DSA and when the organization
- informs the NIC about it, the NIC will set up the shadowing
- arrangement to obtain info on changes of interest [and forget about
- it].
-
- It may be emphasized that the entries under affiliated organizations
- are physical entities [replicated and refined from the Master
- entries, if and when they exist...] rather than alias entries. If a
- NIC dislikes the idea of users poring over the entries in the
- affiliated organizations - appropriate access control can be applied.
- Though duplication is unavoidable, the proposal attempts to make it
- transparent, by delegating the responsibility of maintaining the
- integrity to the Directory.
-
- This issue is discussed in greater detail in a separate document [7].
-
- 5. Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 14]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- 6. Authors' Addresses
-
- Thomas Johannsen
- Dresden University of Technology
- Institute of Communication Technology
- D-01062 Dresden, GERMANY
-
- Phone: +49 351 463-4621
- EMail: Thomas.Johannsen@ifn.et.tu-dresden.de
-
-
- Glenn Mansfield
- AIC Systems Laboratory
- 6-6-3 Minami Yoshinari, Aoba-ku
- Sendai 989-32, JAPAN
-
- Phone: +81 22 279-3310
- EMail: glenn@aic.co.jp
-
-
- Mark Kosters
- Network Solutions, Inc.
- 505 Huntmar Park Dr.
- Herndon, VA 22070
-
- Phone: +1 703 742-4795
- EMail: markk@internic.net
-
-
- Srinivas R. Sataluri
- AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Room 1C-429, 101 Crawfords Corner Road
- Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
-
- Phone: +1 908 949-7782
- EMail: sri@qsun.att.com
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 15]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- References
-
- [1] Mansfield, G., Johannsen, T., and M. Knopper, "Charting Networks
- in the X.500 Directory", RFC 1609, AIC Systems Laboratory,
- Dresden University, Merit Networks,Inc., March 1994.
-
- [2] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space", RFC
- 1466, Merit, May 1993.
-
- [3] Bates, T., Jouanigot, J.-M., Karrenberg, D., Lothberg, P., and M.
- Terpstra, "Representation of IP Routing Policies in the RIPE
- Database", Document ripe-81, RIPE, February 1993.
-
- [4] Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., and K. Varadhan, "Supernetting: An
- Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1338, BARRNet,
- cisco, MERIT, OARnet, June 1992.
-
- [5] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
- Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", STD 16, RFC
- 1155, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May
- 1990.
-
- [6] Barker, P., and S. Kille, "The COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema",
- RFC 1274, University College London, November 1991.
-
- [7] Mansfield, G., Johannsen, T., and J. Murai, J., "Deployment
- Strategy for the Directory in the Internet", AIC Systems
- Laboratory, Dresden University, Keio University, Work in
- Progress, July 1993.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 16]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- Appendix: OID tables
-
- This appendix lists object identifiers for object classes and
- attributes type defined in [1] and this document.
-
- OIDs are given in quipu-oidtable format to make it easy for people to
- include them into their pilots.
-
- IMPORT from oidtable.gen:
-
- iso: 1
- identifiedOrganization: iso.3
- dod: identifiedOrganization.6
- internet: dod.1
- experimental: internet.3
- network-objects: experimental.53
-
-
- -- localoidtable.gen
-
- id-nw-oc: network-objects.1
- id-nw-at: network-objects.2
- id-nw-as: network-objects.3
- ipStringSyntax: ip-nw-as.1
-
-
- -- localoidtable.oc
-
- # general class definitions
- # Format is -
- # Object: OID: SubClassOf: MustHave: MayHave
-
- CommunicationObject: id-nw-oc.1 : top : \
- : \
- adminContact, technContact, description
-
- PhysicalCommunicationObject: id-nw-oc.2 : CommunicationObject : \
- : \
- owner, localityName, ICO
-
- ImageCommunicationObject: id-nw-oc.3 : CommunicationObject : \
- : \
- imageType, imageOf
-
- # physical communication elements
-
- network: id-nw-oc.4 : PhysicalCommunicationObject : \
- networkName : \
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 17]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- externalGateway, nwType, media, speed, traffic, \
- configurationDate, configurationHistory
-
- node: id-nw-oc.5 : PhysicalCommunicationObject : \
- nodeName : \
- typeOfMachine, OS
-
- networkInterface: id-nw-oc.6 : PhysicalCommunicationObject : \
- networkInterfaceName : \
- networkInterfaceAddress, connectedNetwork
-
- # image communication elements
-
- networkImage: id-nw-oc.7 : ImageCommunicationObject : \
- : \
- externalGateway, speed, traffic, charge
-
- nodeImage: id-nw-oc.8 : ImageCommunicationObject : \
- :
-
- networkInterfaceImage: id-nw-oc.9 : ImageCommunicationObject : \
- : \
- networkInterfaceAddress, connectedNetwork
-
- # IP image elements
-
- ipNetworkImage: id-nw-oc.10 : networkImage : \
- ipNetworkImageName, ipNwNumber, ipNwMask : \
- associatedDomain, inAddrServer, asNumber, \
- provider, onlineDate
-
- ipNodeImage: id-nw-oc.11 : nodeImage : \
- ipNodeName : \
- protocol, domainName
-
- ipNetworkInterfaceImage: id-nw-oc.12 : networkInterfaceImage : \
- ipNetworkInterfaceName : \
- ipNwMask
-
- as: id-nw-oc.13 : ImageCommunicationObject : \
- asNumber : \
- asName, asIn, asOut, asDefault, asGuardian, \
- lastModifiedDate
-
- # number assignement objects
-
- assignedNumberClass: id-nw-oc.14 : top : \
- : \
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 18]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- assBy, assTo, assDate, nicHandle, relNwElement, \
- description
-
- delegatedBlock: id-nw-oc.15 : AssignedNumberClass : \
- delegatedBlockName, lowerBound, upperBound :
-
- ipGroup: id-nw-oc.16 : AssignedNumberClass : \
- ipGroupName, ipNwMask :
-
- ipReference: id-nw-oc.17 : AssignedNumberClass : \
- ipReferenceName :
-
- asBlock: id-nw-oc.18 : AssignedNumberClass : \
- asBlockName, asLowerBound, asUpperBound :
-
- asReference: id-nw-oc.19 : AssignedNumberClass : \
- asNumber :
-
-
-
- -- localoidtable.at
-
- adminContact: id-nw-at.1 :DN
- technContact: id-nw-at.2 :DN
- ICO: id-nw-at.3 :DN
- imageType: id-nw-at.4 :caseIgnoreString
- imageOf: id-nw-at.5 :DN
- networkName,nw: id-nw-at.6 :caseIgnoreString
- externalGateway: id-nw-at.7 :DN
- nwType: id-nw-at.8 :caseIgnoreString
- media: id-nw-at.9 :caseIgnoreString
- speed: id-nw-at.10 :numericString
- traffic: id-nw-at.11 :numericString
- configurationDate: id-nw-at.12 :utcTime
- configurationHistory: id-nw-at.13 :caseIgnoreString
- nodeName,nd: id-nw-at.14 :caseIgnoreString
- typeOfMachine: id-nw-at.15 :caseIgnoreString
- OS: id-nw-at.16 :caseIgnoreString
- networkInterfaceName,ni: id-nw-at.17 :caseIgnoreString
- networkInterfaceAddress: id-nw-at.18 :caseIgnoreString
- connectedNetwork: id-nw-at.19 :DN
- charge: id-nw-at.20 :numericString
- ipNetworkImageName,IPnw: id-nw-at.21 :caseIgnoreString
- ipNwNumber: id-nw-at.22 :caseIgnoreString
- ipNwMask: id-nw-at.23 :caseIgnoreString
- inAddrServer: id-nw-at.24 :DN
- asNumber,asN: id-nw-at.25 :integerString
- provider: id-nw-at.26 :DN
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 19]
-
- RFC 1608 IP Information in the X.500 Directory March 1994
-
-
- onlineDate: id-nw-at.27 :utcTime
- ipNodeName,IPnd: id-nw-at.28 :caseIgnoreString
- protocol: id-nw-at.29 :caseIgnoreString
- domainName: id-nw-at.30 :caseIgnoreString
- ipNetworkInterfaceName,IPni: id-nw-at.31 :caseIgnoreString
- asName: id-nw-at.32 :caseIgnoreString
- asIn: id-nw-at.33 :caseIgnoreString
- asOut: id-nw-at.34 :caseIgnoreString
- asDefault: id-nw-at.35 :caseIgnoreString
- asGuardian: id-nw-at.36 :DN
- assBy: id-nw-at.37 :DN
- assTo: id-nw-at.38 :DN
- assDate: id-nw-at.39 :utcTime
- nicHandle: id-nw-at.40 :caseIgnoreString
- relNwElement: id-nw-at.41 :DN
- delegatedBlockName,dbl: id-nw-at.42 :caseIgnoreString
- lowerBound: id-nw-at.43 :caseIgnoreString
- upperBound: id-nw-at.44 :caseIgnoreString
- ipGroupName,IPgr: id-nw-at.45 :caseIgnoreString
- ipReferenceName,IPref: id-nw-at.46 :caseIgnoreString
- asBlockName,asBl: id-nw-at.47 :caseIgnoreString
- asLowerBound: id-nw-at.48 :integerString
- asUpperBound: id-nw-at.49 :integerString
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Johannsen, Mansfield, Kosters & Sataluri [Page 20]
-
-