home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Archive-name: online-providers/aol-sucks-faq/part1
- Posting-Frequency: monthly
-
-
- *** FAQ (Part I - Censorship ) ***
-
- How can I leave AOL?
- Delphi has full internet access. Netcom has a new graphical user
- interface, and commercial GUI's also work on any UNIX account.
- For a list of internet access provider's sorted by area code, send
- an e-mail message with the subject "send pdial" to
- kaminski@netcom.com, or to archive-server@cs.widener.edu with the
- subject "send nixpub long". There's also a Usenet group called
- alt.internet.access.wanted to help you leave AOL.
-
-
- Did AOL really change the names of the newsgroups?
- Yes. alt.aol-sucks appears on AOL as "Flames and complaints about
- AOL."
-
-
- Well, this is because AOL didn't like the word "sucks", right?
- Nope. This is because they didn't like the content of the name.
- AOL didn't touch the names of five other newsgroups with "sucks"
- in their name. A newsgroup with the name alt.aol.rejects also had
- the AOL in its name concealed--it was changed to "Why We Don't Play
- by the Rules" for a while. Ironically, that newsgroup was created
- to try to circumvent AOL interference.
-
-
- Are you saying that AOL censors?
- Yes. Messages are frequently pulled from AOL public posting areas.
-
- Your service can be revoked if you say certain words in public chat
- rooms. Anyone seeing you use such a word can page an AOL Guide,
- who will appear in the room to monitor it's content within 5
- minutes. (This has been used by ultra-conservatives that taunt gay
- users into using profanity, then summon a guide to get their access
- revoked.)
-
-
- AOL's terms of service also specifically prohibit certain topics
- which cannot be discussed; for instance, it's forbidden to advocate
- the use of drugs. Restrictions on "discussing with the intention
- to commit illegal activities" are applied to chat rooms about
- "Hackers".
-
-
- Okay, but people don't just go in and arbitrarily shut down things on
- a whim.
-
- The New York Times ran a story about AOL shutting down any public
- chat room with "Riot Grrl" in its name. (Riot Grrls are young
- punk feminists.) They didn't like the content.
-
- At the time, the reason given was "riot" implied violence. But
- compare that to the story of the Michigan man charged with
- electronic stalking: after calling a woman and leaving a message
- on her answering machine saying "I stalked you for the first time
- today", she called the police, who told him not to contact the
- woman again. *That night* he sent e-mail to her AOL account using
- his AOL account, and when she reminded him that the police had
- asked him *not* to contact her, he sent her threatening e-mail...
-
- Criminal charges were filed. But AOL never touched his account.
- He sent me e-mail from AOL the day his story appeared in the New
- York Times. You can still download his GIF from the AOL gallery,
- or read his AOL profile--including his quote, "Sometimes you just
- gotta go for it".
-
-
- Come on, that's just your opinion. If AOL is censoring, how come the
- New York Times hasn't run a front-page story about it?
-
- They have.
-
- Peter H. Lewis
- New York Times Wednesday, June 29, 1994
-
-
- Censors Become a Force on Cyberspace Frontier
-
- Freedom of expression has always been the rule in the fast-growing
- global web of public and private computer networks known as
- cyberspace. But even as thousands of Americans each week join the
- several million who use computer networks to share ideas and
- "chat" with others, the companies that control the networks, and
- sometimes individual users, are beginning to play the role of
- censor.
-
- Earlier this month, the America Online network shut several
- feminist discussion forums....
-
- [copyright New York Times]
-
- The American Library Association felt so strongly about the issue,
- they reprinted the article in their newsletter, "Intellectual
- Freedom".
-
- Andrew Kantor reported in Internet World that AOL even edits the
- results of their Gopher searches.
-
-
- Why don't the AOL user's complain?
- A Usenet posting listed the headings of dozens of complaints
- AOL-ers posted in the complaint area devoted just to complaints
- about AOL's internet access. Among the headings were "Suggestion
- box broken." Also included were:
-
- >Newsgroup suggestion box
- >Does the suggestion box ever work?
- >Please respond to this!
- >Is anybody listening?
- >I wonder if anyone reads these?
-
- AOL's philosophy borders on net-abuse. They went online with a
- Usenet software containing a bug that re-posted every message
- seven times, and even without that, the worldwide cost of
- transmitting AOL messages just to the alt.binaries.pictures.*
- groups over one year has been calculated to be 700 million
- dollars. { 1790.69 kilobytes per two weeks x 26 x .264 ("cost
- per byte for each site") x 58402 (number of sites) =
- $717,836,278.34 }
-
- Allowing their one million users access to FTP sites without
- consideration of the load was similar; straining resources shared
- for other work often forces sites to close. Several sites have
- blocked AOL access because of this. And because of net-
- citizenship issues: AOL users can *take* files from FTP sites,
- but they can't leave any, and while AOL charges for access to
- resources made available to them freely, they prohibit access to
- any of their own.
-
- This gets into an ideological war. Technology now allows people
- to freely exchange information at an amazing rate. AOL attaches a
- meter to that process. In addition, aggressively pursuing new
- users, AOL exploits the lack of awareness of existing
- technological capabilities, and establishes a model that follows
- the traditional role of pre-packaged entertainment designed for a
- mass audience. New users are taught to expect commercial content,
- pay-as-you-go access, and regulatory oversight determining what's
- appropriate. Last October there were rumors that AOL even wanted
- to acquire their own backbone to exploit changes in internet
- backbone status. This has come to pass. The internet community
- is left to hope that as the internet and information technology
- evolve, the greater good will prevail.
-
-
- [End Part I]
-